Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Particle production in a bouncing universe

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A bouncing universe leaves a distinct thermal-like imprint on quantum particle production across modes, unlike expansion alone.

desk verdict Thermal spectrum claim is likely a fitting artifact: they fit occupation numbers to an energy-density formula with k³, which creates the peak; per-mode calculation is new but needs reframing. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.13213 v2 pith:3TUGYKCK submitted 2025-10-15 gr-qc

Mustafa Saeed , Aiman Nauman , Irfan Javed This is my paper
classification gr-qc
keywords bouncingcosmologyparticleproductionquantumfieldtheoryoncurvedspacetimesemiclassicalgravitypolymerquantizationthermalspectrummasslessscalarbigbounce
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether a cosmological bounce leaves a detectable mark on quantum matter. The authors study particle production in the vacuum of a massless scalar field on a background that contracts, bounces, and expands, using quantum field theory on curved spacetime. They find that particle production peaks sharply at the bounce and that the late-time number of particles across modes fits a Planckian (blackbody) curve, with the most particles in an intermediate mode — a pattern absent in purely expanding or contracting universes, where the lightest mode dominates. In a semiclassical treatment that lets the quantum matter backreact on the geometry, the same qualitative spectrum appears and the bounce occurs later. If the result holds, it gives a concrete signature for searches of bouncing cosmologies and a new link between gravity and thermodynamics.

What carries the argument

The key object is the Gaussian quantum state for each Fourier mode of the massless scalar field on an FLRW background with volume v (cube of scale factor). Each mode obeys a harmonic-oscillator Hamiltonian with time-dependent mass $m = v$ and frequency $\omega = k v^{-1/3}$. Particle number per mode is extracted from the Gaussian coefficient α_k through $\langle n_k \rangle = |z|^2/(1-|z|^2)$, where $z = (v^{2/3}k - 2\alpha)/(v^{2/3}k + 2\alpha)$. The late-time spectrum is then compared to the Planckian form $u_{A,T}(k) = 16\pi A k^3/(e^{2\pi k/T}-1)$. In the semiclassical extension, the same Gaussian state enters a state-dependent Hamiltonian constraint through $\langle \rho \rangle_\psi$, giving a coupled evolution of geometry and field in which particle pro

What would settle it

Compute the late-time particle spectrum on the same bouncing geometry without the adiabatic approximation: solve the exact mode equation on the background v(t), define particle number via Bogoliubov coefficients between the positive-frequency modes at early and late times, and fit the Planckian form. A simpler consistency check is to evaluate the adiabatic parameter $|\dot{\omega}/\omega^2|$ at the bounce; if it is not small compared to unity, the adiabatic eigenstates used for the particle-number formula are unreliable and the spectrum should be re-derived.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a cosmological bounce leaves a distinct, thermal-like imprint on quantum matter. Tracking a massless scalar field through a contracting, bouncing, and expanding universe, the authors find that particle production peaks sharply at the bounce and that the late-time spectrum across modes fits a Planckian blackbody curve, with the most particles in an intermediate mode. This contrasts with the contracting and expanding cases, where the lightest mode dominates. The same qualitative spectrum appears when geometry and field are evolved jointly in semiclassical gravity, where particle production also delays the bounce. The paper identifies the condition for the ther

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that instantaneous eigenstates of the mode Hamiltonian at time T can be obtained via the adiabatic approximation; near the bounce, where the geometry changes rapidly, this approximation can fail, and if it does the reported particle numbers — and the thermal spectrum fitted to them — would not represent actual particle production.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Late-time particle production in a bouncing universe has a Planckian spectrum, giving a distinctive target for searches of bounce signatures that is absent in expansion-only cosmology.
  • Varying the polymer scale λ shows that a smaller λ (higher curvature at the bounce) produces more particles, so the amplitude of the spectrum encodes the discreteness scale of the bounce.
  • In semiclassical gravity, particle production shifts the bounce to a later time, demonstrating that the effective geometry is altered by quantum matter backreaction.
  • The thermal-like spectrum is associated with the turnaround in |v̇| (the comoving Hubble scale passing through infinity), not with high curvature, which identifies a geometric criterion for the signature across different bouncing models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the thermal spectrum survives a fully non-adiabatic computation, it would give bouncing cosmology a concrete, searchable observable: a near-blackbody distribution of produced particles whose temperature is fixed by the bounce scale, potentially visible in primordial gravitational-wave backgrounds or relic particle abundances.
  • The paper does not explain why the spectrum peaks at an intermediate mode; a natural next step is to test whether the peak wavenumber tracks the mode that re-enters the Hubble radius at the bounce, and whether it scales with the polymer scale λ as λ^(-1/2) or λ^(-1) across the spectra in the paper.
  • Because both the QFTCB and SG computations inherit the same adiabatic definition of particles, the qualitative agreement between them could be an artifact of that shared approximation; repeating the SG evolution with exact mode functions would show whether backreaction genuinely preserves the Planckian shape.
  • The result that 'expand-then-contract' engineered bounces also produce a thermal-like spectrum suggests the signature is kinematic — tied to the comoving Hubble scale diverging — rather than unique to a bounce; the same spectrum might appear in any cosmology with a turnaround, such as cyclic models or closed universes, which could be tested with the same numerical method.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies particle production of a massless scalar field on a polymer-quantized bouncing cosmological background. The authors evolve Gaussian mode states using the Schrödinger equation, compute the late-time mean occupation number per mode via Eq. (28), and report that the resulting spectrum resembles a Planckian blackbody spectrum. They compare this with purely expanding and contracting universes, and then extend the analysis to semiclassical gravity with backreaction, finding that backreaction shifts the bounce later. The paper's central claim is that the late-time particle production across modes is thermal-like, with a peak at an intermediate mode.

Significance. If correct, the result that a bounce leaves a distinct thermal-like imprint on quantum fields would be a notable contribution to searches for bouncing-universe signatures and to the gravity–thermodynamics connection. The manuscript is clearly structured and the numerical evolution of the mode equations is straightforward. However, the headline thermal claim is not supported by the analysis: the fit is made to an energy-density functional form while the computed observable is an occupation number, and the reported data are inconsistent with thermal occupation. This is a load-bearing conceptual error that undermines the main conclusion. The SG extension is interesting in principle, but inherits the same interpretational issue.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.A.2, Eq. (28) and the fitting formula after Fig. 3] The headline claim of a 'thermal spectrum' is based on fitting the computed occupation numbers ⟨n_k⟩=|z_k|²/(1−|z_k|²) to u_{A,T}(k)=16πA k³/(e^{2πk/T}−1). This u is a spectral energy density, not an occupation number. A thermal state of massless modes would have n_k=(e^{E_k/T}−1)^{-1}, which is monotonically decreasing in k for E_k∝k. The paper's own data (n_{0.001}<n_{0.01} in Fig. 2) violate this. The k³ factor in the fit artificially imposes the low-k suppression and the peak. The quoted R²≈0.90 (QFTCB) and R²≈0.97 (SG) are therefore not evidence of thermality. The authors should instead fit the occupation-number form and report whether the data are consistent with it; as it stands, the central claim is unsupported.
  2. [Sec. III.A.1, Eqs. (24)–(29)] The instantaneous eigenstates used to define ⟨n_k⟩ are said to be obtained 'via the adiabatic approximation for simplicity,' but no check of adiabaticity is provided, and near the bounce the geometry changes rapidly. For the quadratic Hamiltonian of Eq. (20) the exact instantaneous Gaussian ground state is known (α_inst=k v^{2/3}/2), so the adiabatic approximation is unnecessary for this step. If a different construction is intended, it should be stated precisely. As written, the definition of particle number is ambiguous and the claim that ⟨n_k⟩ measures 'particles produced' is not rigorously justified; at minimum the authors should compare with the exact instantaneous eigenstates and quantify the error.
  3. [Sec. III.A.2, Fig. 3 and Sec. III.B.2, Fig. 7] The Planck fits involve two free parameters, A and T, and are performed over a specific finite range of 10³ log-spaced k values. No error bars, convergence tests with respect to the UV cutoff and k-range, or goodness-of-fit diagnostics beyond R² are reported. R²≈0.90–0.97 for a two-parameter fit to a structured spectrum is weak support for a universal thermal form, particularly given the shape mismatch described above. The paper should provide residuals and fits using the correct occupation-number form.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II, Eq. (16)–(19)] The solution for v in the classical case is given without derivation; a brief derivation or reference would help. Also, the sign choice in Eq. (19) for the bounce solution is not discussed (positive root is implicit).
  2. [Sec. III.A.2, Fig. 4] The statement that 'more particles are produced for smaller λ' is plausible, but the plot is only qualitative. A log-log plot or a quantitative scaling would strengthen the claim.
  3. [Sec. IV, Reflections] The paragraph about the Gaussian ansatz states that for QFTCB it 'captures the same physics as a more general evolution' but no evidence or reference is given for this claim. This is a non-trivial assertion and should be supported or removed.
  4. [General] There are several typographical issues: 'Schr¨ odinger' appears with a misplaced double dot in several places, and 'FLR W' in Sec. III.A.1 should likely be 'FLRW'.
  5. [Sec. III.B.2] The UV cutoff (10³ log-spaced k between 0 and 1) and the choice of λ=1 are not fully justified; the dependence of the SG results on these choices should be tested or at least discussed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: particle numbers are computed from the mode Schroedinger dynamics, and the thermal claim is a post-hoc fit, not a construction or a fitted input renamed as prediction.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The paper starts from the Gaussian ansatz (21), evolves each Fourier mode with the time-dependent Schroedinger equation (23), and computes the late-time occupation number from Eqs. (28)-(29). The Planckian claim is then made by fitting u_{A,T}(k)=16 pi A k^3/(e^{2 pi k/T}-1) to the already-computed spectrum (Sec. III.A.2, Fig. 3), with both A and T as free parameters. This is an ex post characterization rather than an input to the mode evolution, so no equation reduces to itself and no fitted parameter is presented as an independent prediction. The main qualifications are validity concerns rather than circularity: the instantaneous eigenstates are obtained 'via the adiabatic approximation for simplicity' near a rapidly changing bounce, and comparing per-mode occupation numbers to a k^3-weighted Planck energy-density form is a statistical mismatch (a thermal occupation spectrum would decrease monotonically with k for massless modes). The paper also relies on the same first author's earlier work [22] for the polymer-quantized bounce background, but that self-citation supplies an input model rather than the particle-production result, and it is corroborated by independent references [21,23]. These issues affect confidence in the thermal conclusion but do not make the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on the polymer-LQC effective bounce imported from prior work (including the first author's [22]), and on QFTCB/SG approximations. The only numbers fitted to output are the Planck-fit A and T; λ and the numerical grid are chosen by hand. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • Polymer scale λ = λ = 1 in main simulations; varied in Figs. 4 and 8 (values not tabulated)
    Sets critical density ρ_c = 3/(8λ²); particle production increases for smaller λ, so the thermal-like spectrum is λ-dependent.
  • QFTCB Planck-fit temperature T = T ≈ 3.4×10^-2
    Fitted to the computed late-time spectrum with the Planckian form; supports the 'thermal spectrum' claim but is a fit, not a prediction.
  • QFTCB Planck-fit normalization A = A ≈ 9.5×10^5
    Second free parameter in the fit; needed because the paper does not derive the absolute normalization of the Planck formula.
  • SG Planck-fit temperature T_SG = T ≈ 1.3×10^-2
    Fitted to the semiclassical-gravity spectrum (Fig. 7).
  • SG Planck-fit normalization A_SG = A ≈ 6.6×10^8
    Fitted normalization for the SG spectrum; with T_SG yields R²≈0.97.
  • Numerical simulation parameters = τ=500, Δt=0.5, 10^3 log-spaced k modes
    Chosen for the simulations; no convergence study except a statement that lower step sizes do not change the results.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Effective polymer-quantized Friedmann equation H² = (ρ/6)(1−ρ/ρ_c) with ρ_c=3/(8λ²), and the bounce solution v(t)=√(27t²+48λ²)/(6 p̃_ϕ) (Sec. II, Eqs. 18-19).
    The bouncing background is imported from effective polymer/LQC quantization, not derived in this paper; the particle-production results live inside this model.
  • domain assumption Each inhomogeneous scalar-field mode is treated as an oscillator with Hamiltonian h_k = (1/2)(p_k²/v + v k² v^{-2/3} ϕ_k²), quantized with a Gaussian ansatz (Sec. III.A.1, Eqs. 20-24).
    Standard QFTCB on FLRW; assumes mode decoupling and no interactions.
  • ad hoc to paper Instantaneous eigenstates at time T are obtained from those at t0 via the adiabatic approximation (Sec. III.A.1, 'computed ... via the adiabatic approximation for simplicity').
    A numerical convenience; near the bounce the geometry changes quickly, so adiabaticity is questionable and this directly feeds the ⟨n_k⟩ formula used for the thermal-spectrum claim.
  • domain assumption Initial state of each mode at t0 is the instantaneous ground state (Eqs. 25-26).
    Choice of vacuum; standard, but results may depend on it.
  • domain assumption Semiclassical gravity uses a state-dependent Hamiltonian constraint H_{e,ψ} and joint evolution of geometry and matter (Sec. III.B, Eqs. 31-36).
    Imported from canonical SG literature [9-11]; the paper applies rather than derives it.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Particle production in a bouncing universe." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3TUGYKCK

@misc{pith2026251013213,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Particle production in a bouncing universe},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3TUGYKCK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.13213}
}
read the original abstract

In massless scalar field cosmology, imposing the universe's physical volume as fundamentally discrete resolves the big bang singularity via a big bounce. We use quantum field theory on curved background to numerically track the number of particles created in the vacuum of a quantum field that propagates through the cosmological bounce. We find that due to geometry's evolution, particle production in all modes initially rises, sharply peaks at the bounce, and varies slowly afterwards. Further, by comparing with the case of a quantum field propagating on an expanding universe, we discover that the bouncing universe's imprints on quantum matter are distinct: notably, the late time particle production across modes resembles a thermal spectrum. We then use semiclassical gravity and find a similar qualitative result. Here, we also determine how particle production affects geometry's evolution. Our study adds to existing literature on gravity-matter interactions in the context of a bouncing universe, contributes to searches of a bouncing universe's signatures, and suggests -- within this context -- a link between gravity, quantum fields and thermodynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.13213 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Particle production in the contracting, expanding and bouncing universes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Late time particle production spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Note that a spectrum like the bouncing uni [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Late time particle production spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Late time particle production spectrum for different polymer scales [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Late time particle production spectrum for different bouncing universes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Particle production through a cosmological bounce in semiclassical gravity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Late time spectrum graph in semiclassical cosmology [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Late time particle production spectrum for different polymer scales in semiclassical cosmology [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum Circuit Complexity as a Measure of Particle Creation in Bouncing Cosmologies

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Exact non-perturbative calculation shows circuit complexity stays finite at the bounce and its post-bounce growth correlates with cosmological particle production via a chirping term.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [29]

    Novello and S

    M. Novello and S. P. Bergliaffa, Physics Reports463, 127 (2008), ISSN 0370-1573

    2008

  2. [1]

    (20) Here,k=| ⃗k|and (ϕ k,p k) are the spatial Fourier trans- forms of the scalar field phase space variables

    Formalism An inhomogeneous massless scalar field on an FLR W background described by the metric withN= 1 has the following Hamiltonian in spatial Fourier space: Hϕ = Z d3k (2π)3 1 2 p2 k v +v k v 1 3 ϕ2 k ≡ Z d3k (2π)3 hk. (20) Here,k=| ⃗k|and (ϕ k,p k) are the spatial Fourier trans- forms of the scalar field phase space variables. Notably, 4 the field mo...

  3. [2]

    The results are in the left column in Fig

    Results For the contracting universe, we performed the simula- tion fromt=−τthrought=−t P , whereτ= 500 andt P is the Planck time, with a time step of ∆t= 0.5 (the re- sults do not change with lower step sizes). The results are in the left column in Fig. 1. The top subfigure shows the contracting universe, the central one compares the Hub- ble scale with ...

  4. [3]

    The selectedv(t) are not found by solving Einstein’s equations for some matter type

    Other bouncing universes Using QFTCB, we also study particle production due to other bouncing universes described by an engineered v(t). The selectedv(t) are not found by solving Einstein’s equations for some matter type. They are useful because they allow us to probe the properties of the spectrum further. The cases we explored are represented by the fol...

  5. [4]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 1982)

    1982

  6. [5]

    Our semiclassical cosmological model comprises the polymer quantum corrected geometry and a quantum massless inhomogeneous scalar field

    Formalism A system of effective cosmological geometry and mass- less (classical) homogeneous scalar field has Hamiltonian constraint (17), which leads to the effective Friedmann equation (18). Our semiclassical cosmological model comprises the polymer quantum corrected geometry and a quantum massless inhomogeneous scalar field. The sys- tem has the state-...

  7. [6]

    Results For simulations, we usedλ= 1 and replaced the in- tegral by a sum with 10 3 equispacedk-values between 0 and 1 on the log scale, the latter being a UV cutoff. We chose the log scale due to its utility in presenting the spectrum graphs; we also determined that this selection leads to similar results as choosing equispacedkon the standard scale. At ...

  8. [7]

    R. M. Wald,General Relativity(Chicago Univ. Pr., Chicago, USA, 1984)

    1984

Show all 37 references
  1. [8]

    Halvorson, Studies in History and Philosophy of Sci- ence Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Mod- ern Physics35, 45 (2004)

    H. Halvorson, Studies in History and Philosophy of Sci- ence Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Mod- ern Physics35, 45 (2004)

    2004

  2. [9]

    Corichi, T

    A. Corichi, T. Vukaˇ sinac, and J. A. Zapata, Phys. Rev. D76, 044016 (2007)

    2007

  3. [10]

    Husain and S

    V. Husain and S. Singh, Phys. Rev. D104, 124048 (2021)

    2021

  4. [11]

    Paker and D

    L. Paker and D. Toms,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2009)

    2009

  5. [12]

    E. W. Kolb and A. J. Long, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 045005 (2024)

    2024

  6. [13]

    S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys.43, 199 (1975)

    1975

  7. [14]

    B.-L. B. Hu and E. Verdaguer,Semiclassical and Stochas- tic Gravity: Quantum Field Effects on Curved Spacetime, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cam- bridge University Press, 2020)

    2020

  8. [15]

    Husain and S

    V. Husain and S. Singh, Phys. Rev. D99, 086018 (2019)

    2019

  9. [16]

    Ashtekar and E

    A. Ashtekar and E. Bianchi, Reports on Progress in Physics84, 042001 (2021), ISSN 1361-6633

    2021

  10. [17]

    Husain and M

    V. Husain and M. Muzammil, Phys. Rev. D109, 044063 (2024)

    2024

  11. [18]

    Isham,Structural issues in quantum gravity(1995), gr-qc/9510063

    C. Isham,Structural issues in quantum gravity(1995), gr-qc/9510063

    1995 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Kiefer,Quantum Gravity(Oxford University Press 11 UK, 2004)

    C. Kiefer,Quantum Gravity(Oxford University Press 11 UK, 2004)

    2004

  13. [20]

    Carlip, D.-W

    S. Carlip, D.-W. Chiou, W.-T. Ni, and R. Woodard, In- ternational Journal of Modern Physics D24, 1530028 (2015)

    2015

  14. [21]

    Ashtekar and J

    A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski, Classical and Quantum Gravity21, R53 (2004)

    2004

  15. [22]

    III in AN’s thesis

    and those for Sec. III in AN’s thesis. II. A BOUNCING UNIVERSE We consider massless scalar field cosmology with met- ric ds2 =−N(t) 2dt2 +v(t) 2 3 dx2 +dy 2 +dz 2 , (1) wherev(t) is the cube of the scale factor, and scalar field ϕ(t). The canonical action is S=V 0 Z dt 1 16πG ...

  16. [23]

    Ashtekar, T

    A. Ashtekar, T. Pawlowski, and P. Singh, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 141301 (2006)

    2006

  17. [24]

    Ashtekar and P

    A. Ashtekar and P. Singh, Classical and Quantum Grav- ity28, 213001 (2011)

    2011

  18. [25]

    Taveras, Phys

    V. Taveras, Phys. Rev. D78, 064072 (2008)

    2008

  19. [26]

    Rovelli and E

    C. Rovelli and E. Wilson-Ewing, Phys. Rev. D90, 023538 (2014)

    2014

  20. [27]

    Giovannetti, G

    E. Giovannetti, G. Barca, F. Mandini, and G. Montani, Universe8, 302 (2022), ISSN 2218-1997

    2022

  21. [28]

    Saeed and V

    M. Saeed and V. Husain, Phys. Rev. D110, 103504 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Mielczarek, M

    J. Mielczarek, M. Kamionka, A. Kurek, and M. Szyd- lowski, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2010, 004–004 (2010), ISSN 1475-7516

    2010

  23. [31]

    Grain, A

    J. Grain, A. Barrau, T. Cailleteau, and J. Mielczarek, Physical Review D82(2010), ISSN 1550-2368

    2010

  24. [32]

    Lilley, L

    M. Lilley, L. Lorenz, and S. Clesse, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2011, 004–004 (2011), ISSN 1475-7516

    2011

  25. [33]

    Agullo, D

    I. Agullo, D. Kranas, and V. Sreenath, General Relativity and Gravitation53(2021), ISSN 1572-9532

    2021

  26. [34]

    C. Li, R. H. Brandenberger, and Y.-K. E. Cheung, Phys- ical Review D90(2014), ISSN 1550-2368

    2014

  27. [35]

    L. J. Garay, M. Mart ´ ın-Benito, and E. Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez, Physical Review D89(2014), ISSN 1550-2368

    2014

  28. [36]

    Mahajan and T

    G. Mahajan and T. Padmanabhan, General Relativity and Gravitation40, 661–708 (2007), ISSN 1572-9532

    2007

  29. [37]

    Mahajan and T

    G. Mahajan and T. Padmanabhan, General Relativity and Gravitation40, 709–747 (2007), ISSN 1572-9532

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.