pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.05967 · v1 · pith:3U2SL3ENnew · submitted 2019-07-12 · 💻 cs.IT · math.IT

Multi-Hop Wireless Optical Backhauling for LiFi Attocell Networks: Bandwidth Scheduling and Power Control

Hossein Kazemi , Majid Safari , Harald Haas This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 21:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.IT math.IT
keywords backhaulbandwidthpowerschedulingwirelesscellslifimulti-hop
0
0 comments X

The pith

Multi-hop optical backhaul with super cells allows UBS and CBS policies to raise end-to-end sum rates while cutting power use in LiFi attocell networks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper designs a multi-hop wireless optical backhaul for LiFi networks using super cells that connect clusters of attocells to the core via decode-and-forward relaying over directed LOS IR links. It introduces user-based bandwidth scheduling (UBS) and cell-based bandwidth scheduling (CBS) policies, each cast as a constrained convex optimization problem solved via the projected subgradient method. A fixed power control strategy reduces backhaul transmission power opportunistically. An approximate expression for the probability of backhaul bottleneck occurrence is derived and confirmed by Monte Carlo simulations. These steps together improve multi-user sum rate and backhaul power efficiency.

Core claim

The authors establish that by organizing LiFi attocells into super cells with multi-hop DF relaying over directed LOS IR links, the end-to-end multi-user sum rate can be maximized under UBS and CBS bandwidth allocation policies formulated as convex programs and solved by projected subgradient, while FPC opportunistically lowers power and an accurate closed-form approximation gives the BBO probability.

What carries the argument

User-based bandwidth scheduling (UBS) and cell-based bandwidth scheduling (CBS) policies, each formulated as constrained convex optimization problems solved by the projected subgradient method, together with fixed power control (FPC).

If this is right

  • Higher average end-to-end multi-user sum rates under both UBS and CBS policies.
  • Improved backhaul power efficiency through the FPC strategy.
  • Accurate prediction of BBO probability via the derived approximation.
  • Better performance metrics in multi-tier optical attocell networks organized as super cells.
  • Gains verified across simulations of sum rate, BBO probability, and power efficiency.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The scheduling approach could extend to other dense wireless networks if LOS conditions can be maintained.
  • Convexity of the problems may support low-latency implementations in real deployments.
  • Testing under partial blockage or mobility would reveal limits of the reliability assumption.
  • Similar multi-hop modeling might apply to hybrid RF-optical backhaul setups.
  • keywords:[
  • LiFi
  • optical backhauling
  • multi-hop relaying

Load-bearing premise

The directed LOS IR links provide reliable multi-hop DF relaying without significant interference or error propagation, keeping the allocation problems convex.

What would settle it

Monte Carlo simulations showing the approximate BBO probability expression deviates significantly from empirical values, or the subgradient method failing to converge to the claimed sum rate improvements under realistic channel conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.05967 by Harald Haas, Hossein Kazemi, Majid Safari.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: One branch of a five tier super cell with multi-hop wire [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Average sum rate performance of optimal UBS and optim [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Average sum rate performance of optimal UBS and optim [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Average sum rate performance of optimal UBS and optim [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: K∗ b,min for MSPC and the backhaul rate Rb1 |Kb=K∗ b,min as a function of the total number of tiers NT and the bandwidth ratio Bb Ba . (a) Power control coefficient. (b) Backhaul rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: K∗ b,min for ASPC and the backhaul rate Rb1 |Kb=K∗ b,min as a function of the total number of tiers NT and the bandwidth ratio Bb Ba . of the normalized bandwidth. For given values of NT and Bb Ba , the highest value of Kb,min is set by MSPC, the second highest by ASPC, and the lowest by ARPC, confirming that: KARPC b,min < KASPC b,min < KMSPC b,min . (64) The amount of power assigned to the backhaul syste… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: K∗ b,min for ARPC and the backhaul rate Rb1 |Kb=K∗ b,min as a function of the total number of tiers NT and the bandwidth ratio Bb Ba . backhaul rates also obey the same rule in (64). For a fixed number of tiers, Figs. 5a, 6a and 7a show that by increasing the backhaul bandwidth, the level of Kb,min lessens for all the schemes altogether. Hence, more power needs to be allocated to the backhaul system when t… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Analytical and simulation results of the BBO probabi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The BBO probability for NPC, MSPC, ASPC and ARPC schem [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The average sum rate performance for NPC, MSPC, ASPC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: For the case of ARPC, albeit the improvement in PE is ac [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The backhaul of hundreds of light fidelity (LiFi) base stations (BSs) constitutes a major challenge. Indoor wireless optical backhauling is a novel approach whereby the interconnections between adjacent LiFi BSs are provided by way of directed line-of-sight (LOS) wireless infrared (IR) links. Building on the aforesaid approach, this paper presents the top-down design of a multi-hop wireless backhaul configuration for multi-tier optical attocell networks by proposing the novel idea of super cells. Such cells incorporate multiple clusters of attocells that are connected to the core network via a single gateway based on multi-hop decode-and-forward (DF) relaying. Consequently, new challenges arise for managing the bandwidth and power resources of the bottleneck backhaul. By putting forward user-based bandwidth scheduling (UBS) and cell-based bandwidth scheduling (CBS) policies, the system-level modeling and analysis of the end-to-end multi-user sum rate is elaborated. In addition, optimal bandwidth scheduling under both UBS and CBS policies are formulated as constrained convex optimization problems, which are solved by using the projected subgradient method. Furthermore, the transmission power of the backhaul system is opportunistically reduced by way of an innovative fixed power control (FPC) strategy. The notion of backhaul bottleneck occurrence (BBO) is introduced. An accurate approximate expression of the probability of BBO is derived, and then verified using Monte Carlo simulations. Several insights are provided into the offered gains of the proposed schemes through extensive computer simulations, by studying different aspects of the performance of super cells including the average sum rate, the BBO probability and the backhaul power efficiency (PE).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a super-cell architecture for multi-hop decode-and-forward relaying over directed LOS IR links to backhaul dense LiFi attocell networks. It introduces user-based (UBS) and cell-based (CBS) bandwidth scheduling policies, formulates both as constrained convex optimization problems solved via the projected subgradient method, adds a fixed power control (FPC) strategy to reduce backhaul transmit power, and derives an approximate closed-form expression for the probability of backhaul bottleneck occurrence (BBO) that is validated by Monte Carlo simulation. Extensive simulations are used to quantify gains in end-to-end multi-user sum rate, BBO probability, and backhaul power efficiency.

Significance. If the convexity assertions and BBO approximation hold under the paper's channel and rate models, the work supplies a concrete, implementable resource-allocation framework for the backhaul bottleneck in optical attocell deployments; the Monte Carlo verification of the BBO expression and the explicit FPC power-reduction strategy constitute reproducible strengths that would be useful to system designers.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the UBS and CBS problems are convex (and therefore globally solvable by projected subgradient) is central to the performance claims, yet the manuscript provides neither the explicit end-to-end rate expressions (min-cut over multi-hop DF links) nor the second-derivative or Hessian argument establishing concavity of the objective under the stated power and bandwidth constraints; without these, it is impossible to rule out hidden non-concavity arising from the composition of log(1+SNR) terms across hops.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the approximate BBO probability expression is asserted to be accurate after Monte Carlo verification, but the derivation of the threshold and the handling of hop-to-hop correlation are not shown; any omitted dependence between successive IR links would introduce systematic bias that the independent Monte Carlo trials would not detect.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to provide the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the UBS and CBS problems are convex (and therefore globally solvable by projected subgradient) is central to the performance claims, yet the manuscript provides neither the explicit end-to-end rate expressions (min-cut over multi-hop DF links) nor the second-derivative or Hessian argument establishing concavity of the objective under the stated power and bandwidth constraints; without these, it is impossible to rule out hidden non-concavity arising from the composition of log(1+SNR) terms across hops.

    Authors: The end-to-end rate per user under multi-hop DF is the minimum achievable rate across the hops on its path. Each per-hop rate is a concave function of the allocated bandwidth (logarithmic in SNR, with SNR linear in bandwidth at fixed power). The sum-rate objective under linear bandwidth and power constraints remains concave, allowing the projected subgradient method. To address the concern that these steps were not shown explicitly, we will add the min-cut rate expressions and the Hessian/concavity verification in the revision. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the approximate BBO probability expression is asserted to be accurate after Monte Carlo verification, but the derivation of the threshold and the handling of hop-to-hop correlation are not shown; any omitted dependence between successive IR links would introduce systematic bias that the independent Monte Carlo trials would not detect.

    Authors: The BBO threshold is obtained by solving for the rate value at which backhaul capacity drops below the access demand; the closed-form approximation then uses the product of per-hop CDFs under an independence assumption. Monte Carlo trials employ the full geometric channel model (including any hop correlations from shared paths or shadowing) and still match the approximation closely, indicating negligible bias in the evaluated regimes. We will insert the explicit threshold derivation and a short discussion of the independence approximation in the revision. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations and verifications are independent

full rationale

The paper formulates UBS/CBS as constrained convex problems solved via projected subgradient, introduces BBO with an approximate probability expression, and verifies the expression via separate Monte Carlo simulations. Performance metrics (sum rate, power efficiency) are obtained from simulations of the proposed policies rather than reducing to fitted parameters or self-citations by construction. No load-bearing self-citation chains, self-definitional steps, or renamed known results appear in the abstract or described chain. The central claims rest on explicit modeling assumptions and numerical evaluation outside the input definitions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 2 invented entities

Central claim rests on domain assumptions about ideal LOS IR channels and DF relaying performance; super cells and BBO are new constructs introduced without external validation in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Directed LOS IR links support reliable multi-hop decode-and-forward relaying without significant interference or error propagation
    Invoked to enable the super cell backhaul configuration and bottleneck analysis described in the abstract.
invented entities (2)
  • super cells no independent evidence
    purpose: Group multiple attocell clusters connected to core network via single gateway using multi-hop DF relaying
    Introduced as the novel architectural idea enabling the bandwidth and power management study.
  • backhaul bottleneck occurrence (BBO) no independent evidence
    purpose: Define and analyze the probability that backhaul links limit end-to-end performance
    New performance metric introduced to quantify backhaul impact.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5838 in / 1430 out tokens · 30533 ms · 2026-05-24T21:58:30.560213+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Energy savings forecast of solid-state lighting in gen eral illumination applications

    “Energy savings forecast of solid-state lighting in gen eral illumination applications.” U.S. Department of Energ y. Technical Report, Aug. 2014

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Cree extends groundbreaking OSQ Series to deliver 58 pe rcent efficacy increase and new higher output luminaire,

    “Cree extends groundbreaking OSQ Series to deliver 58 pe rcent efficacy increase and new higher output luminaire,” Cr ee Inc. Technical Report, 24 May 2016

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Lighting the Wireless World: The Promise and Challenges of Visible Light Communication,

    M. Figueiredo, L. N. Alves, and C. Ribeiro, “Lighting the Wireless World: The Promise and Challenges of Visible Light Communication,” IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. , vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 28–37, Oct. 2017

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    What is LiFi?

    H. Haas, L. Yin, Y . Wang, and C. Chen, “What is LiFi?” IEEE/OSA J. Lightw. Technol. , vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1533–1544, Mar. 2016

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Coexistence of WiFi and LiFi Toward 5G: Concepts, Opportun ities, and Challenges,

    M. Ayyash, H. Elgala, A. Khreishah, V . Jungnickel, T. Lit tle, S. Shao, M. Rahaim, D. Schulz, J. Hilt, and R. Freund, “Coexistence of WiFi and LiFi Toward 5G: Concepts, Opportun ities, and Challenges,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 64–71, Feb. 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Area Spectral Effic iency Performance Comparison between VLC and RF Femtocell Networks,

    I. Stefan, H. Burchardt, and H. Haas, “Area Spectral Effic iency Performance Comparison between VLC and RF Femtocell Networks,” pp. 3825–3829, Jun. 2013

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Downlink Performa nce of Optical Attocell Networks,

    C. Chen, D. A. Basnayaka, and H. Haas, “Downlink Performa nce of Optical Attocell Networks,” IEEE/OSA J. Lightw. Technol., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 137–156, Jan. 2016

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Backhauling 5G S mall Cells: A Radio Resource Management Perspective,

    N. Wang, E. Hossain, and V . K. Bhargava, “Backhauling 5G S mall Cells: A Radio Resource Management Perspective,” IEEE Wireless Commun. , vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 41–49, Oct. 2015

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    Fiber to the Home/Fiber to the Premises: What , Where, and When?

    T. Koonen, “Fiber to the Home/Fiber to the Premises: What , Where, and When?” Proc. IEEE, vol. 94, no. 5, pp. 911–934, May 2006

    work page 2006

  10. [10]

    Indoor Coop erative Small Cells over Ethernet,

    W. Ni, R. P . Liu, I. B. Collings, and X. Wang, “Indoor Coop erative Small Cells over Ethernet,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 100–107, Sep. 2013

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    Evaluation of Power Li ne Communication Equipment in Home Networks,

    A. Papaioannou and F. Pavlidou, “Evaluation of Power Li ne Communication Equipment in Home Networks,” IEEE Sensors J., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 288–294, Sep. 2009

    work page 2009

  12. [12]

    Millimeter-Wave Access and Backhauling: The Solution to the Exponential Data Traffic Increase in 5G Mobil e Communications Systems?

    C. Dehos, J. L. Gonzalez, A. D. Domenico, D. Ktnas, and L. Dussopt, “Millimeter-Wave Access and Backhauling: The Solution to the Exponential Data Traffic Increase in 5G Mobil e Communications Systems?” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 88–95, Sep. 2014. 35

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    G.fast: Evolving the Copper Access Network,

    M. Timmers, M. Guenach, C. Nuzman, and J. Maes, “G.fast: Evolving the Copper Access Network,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 74–79, Aug. 2013

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    Integrated System of White L ED Visible-Light Communication and Power-Line Communication,

    T. Komine and M. Nakagawa, “Integrated System of White L ED Visible-Light Communication and Power-Line Communication,” IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. , vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 71–79, Feb. 2003

    work page 2003

  15. [15]

    Performance E valuation of Narrowband OFDM on Integrated System of Power Line Communication and Visible Light Wireless Commun ication,

    T. Komine, S. Haruyama, and M. Nakagawa, “Performance E valuation of Narrowband OFDM on Integrated System of Power Line Communication and Visible Light Wireless Commun ication,” in Proc. IEEE 1st Int. Symp. Wireless Pervasive Comput., Jan. 2006

    work page 2006

  16. [16]

    An Indoor Broadband Broadcasting System Based on PLC and VLC,

    J. Song, W. Ding, F. Yang, H. Yang, B. Y u, and H. Zhang, “An Indoor Broadband Broadcasting System Based on PLC and VLC,” IEEE Trans. Broadcast. , vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 299–308, Jun. 2015

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    Hybrid Visible Ligh t and Power Line Communication for Indoor Multiuser Downlink,

    H. Ma, L. Lampe, and S. Hranilovic, “Hybrid Visible Ligh t and Power Line Communication for Indoor Multiuser Downlink,” IEEE/OSA J. Opt. Commun. Netw. , vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 635–647, Aug. 2017

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Ethernet over Light,

    P . Mark, “Ethernet over Light,” Master’s thesis, Unive rsity of British Columbia, Dec. 2014

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    Design and Implementation of an Ethernet-VLC Interface for Broadcast Transmissions,

    F. Delgado, I. Quintana, J. Rufo, J. A. Rabadan, C. Quint ana, and R. Perez-Jimenez, “Design and Implementation of an Ethernet-VLC Interface for Broadcast Transmissions,” IEEE Commun. Lett. , vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1089–1091, Dec. 2010

    work page 2010

  20. [20]

    Network Arch itecture of a High-Speed Visible Light Communication Local Area Network,

    Y . Wang, N. Chi, Y . Wang, L. Tao, and J. Shi, “Network Arch itecture of a High-Speed Visible Light Communication Local Area Network,” IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. , vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 197–200, Jan. 2015

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    Net work Architecture of Bidirectional Visible Light Communication and Passive Optical Network,

    C. W. Chow, C. H. Yeh, Y . Liu, C. W. Hsu, and J. Y . Sung, “Net work Architecture of Bidirectional Visible Light Communication and Passive Optical Network,” IEEE Photon. J. , vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1–7, Jun. 2016

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Y . Wang, J. Shi, C. Yang, Y . Wang, and N. Chi, “Integrated 10 Gb/s multilevel multiband passive optical network and 500 Mb/s indoor visible light communication system based on Nyquist single carrier frequency domain equalization modulation,” Opt. Lett. , vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 2576–2579, May 2014

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    A Wireless Backhaul S olution Using Visible Light Communication for Indoor Li-Fi Attocell Networks,

    H. Kazemi, M. Safari, and H. Haas, “A Wireless Backhaul S olution Using Visible Light Communication for Indoor Li-Fi Attocell Networks,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. (ICC) , May 2017, pp. 1–7

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    A Wireless Optical Backhaul Solution for Optical A ttocell Networks,

    ——, “A Wireless Optical Backhaul Solution for Optical A ttocell Networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 807–823, Feb. 2019

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Bandwidth Scheduling and Power Control for Wirele ss Backhauling in Optical Attocell Networks,

    ——, “Bandwidth Scheduling and Power Control for Wirele ss Backhauling in Optical Attocell Networks,” in Proc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM) , Dec. 2018, pp. 1–7

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Capacity Theorems for the Rela y Channel,

    T. Cover and A. E. Gamal, “Capacity Theorems for the Rela y Channel,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory , vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 572–584, Sep. 1979

    work page 1979

  27. [27]

    Wireless Infrared Communica tions,

    J. M. Kahn and J. R. Barry, “Wireless Infrared Communica tions,” Proc. IEEE , vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 265–298, Feb. 1997

    work page 1997

  28. [28]

    Bidirectio nal User Throughput Maximization Based on Feedback Reducti on in LiFi Networks,

    M. D. Soltani, X. Wu, M. Safari, and H. Haas, “Bidirectio nal User Throughput Maximization Based on Feedback Reducti on in LiFi Networks,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 3172–3186, Jul. 2018

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Boyd and L

    S. Boyd and L. V andenberghe, Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, Mar. 2004

    work page 2004

  30. [30]

    D. P . Bertsekas, Nonlinear Programming, 3rd ed. Athena Scientific, 2016

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    Subgradient Methods,

    S. Boyd, “Subgradient Methods,” Lecture Notes for EE36 4b, Stanford University, May 2014

    work page 2014

  32. [32]

    E. K. P . Chong and S. H. Zak, An Introduction to Optimization , 4th ed. Wiley-Interscience Publication, Feb. 2013

    work page 2013

  33. [33]

    V allentin, Probability and Statistics Cookbook , Dec

    M. V allentin, Probability and Statistics Cookbook , Dec. 2017, V ersion 0.2.6. [Online]. Available: http://st atistics.zone/

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    Wireless Data from Every Light Bulb

    W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1968, vol. 1. 36 Hossein Kazemi (S’16) received the M.Sc. degree (with a specialty in microe lectronic circuits) from Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran, in 2011, the M.Sc. degree (with a focus in communication systems) with honors from ¨Ozy...

    work page 1968