pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.08562 · v1 · pith:3UJWZM2Jnew · submitted 2019-07-19 · ⚛️ physics.acc-ph · hep-ex

First demonstration of ionization cooling by the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment

M. Bogomilov , R. Tsenov , G. Vankova-Kirilova , Y. P. Song , J. Y. Tang , Z. H. Li , R. Bertoni , M. Bonesini
show 127 more authors
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 18:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.acc-ph hep-ex
keywords ionization coolingmuon beamsbeam emittanceaccelerator physicscooling cellphase space volumepion decay
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ionization cooling of muon beams has been demonstrated for the first time.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports the construction of a section of an ionization cooling cell and its first use to demonstrate ionization cooling of muons. Ionization cooling reduces the phase space volume of the beam by having particles lose momentum in an absorber and then being refocused by magnets. This technique is required to create high-brightness muon beams from pion decay sources, which otherwise occupy too large a volume. The measurements confirm a reduction in emittance consistent with the cooling process. This matters for enabling future muon-based accelerators for high-energy physics and neutrino research.

Core claim

A section of an ionization cooling cell has been constructed and used to provide the first demonstration of ionization cooling through a measured reduction in the beam emittance of muons.

What carries the argument

Ionization cooling cell section that removes energy via absorbers while magnets restore transverse momentum, with upstream and downstream trackers measuring the emittance change.

Load-bearing premise

The observed reduction in beam emittance is caused by ionization cooling rather than by unaccounted beam transport effects, scattering, or measurement systematics.

What would settle it

A measurement in which the emittance shows no reduction or an increase after passage through the cell, once all other effects are accounted for, would falsify the demonstration.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.08562 by A. Blondel, A. D. Bross, A. De Bari, A. DeMello, A. Dobbs, A. Gallagher, A. Grant, A. J. Dick, A. Kurup, A. Lambert, A. Liu, A. Moss, A. Muir, A. Nichols, A. Oates, A. R. Young, A. Sato, A. Wilson, B. Freemire, B. Martlew, C. Brown, C. G. Whyte, C. Heidt, C. Hunt, C. K. Sung, C. MacWaters, C. N. Booth, C. Pidcott, C. Rogers, C. White, D. Adams, D. Adey, D. A. Sanders, D. Bowring, D. Colling, D. Jokovic, D. J. Summers, D. Li, D. Maletic, D. M. Kaplan, D. Neuffer, D. Orestano, E. Overton, F. Chignoli, F. Drielsma, F. Filthaut, F. J. P. Soler, G. Charnley, G. G. Hanson, G. Stokes, G. T. Chatzitheodoridis, G. Vankova-Kirilova, H. Sakamoto, H. Witte, I. Mullacrane, I. Taylor, J.-B. Lagrange, J. Boehm, J. C. Nugent, J. Govans, J. H. Cobb, J. J. Nebrensky, J. Langlands, J. Martyniak, J. Nikolov, J. Pasternak, J. R. Greis, J. Tarrant, J. Y. Tang, K. Dumbell, K. Long, K. Ronald, L. M. Cremaldi, L. R. Coney, L. Tortora, M. A. Uchida, M. Bogomilov, M. Bonesini, M. Chung, M. Courthold, M. Ellis, M. Hills, M. Palmer, M. Popovic, M. Savic, M. Tucker, M. Vretenar, N. Collomb, N. Jovancevic, P. B. Jurj, P. Cooke, P. Dornan, P. Franchini, P. Hanlet, P. Hodgson, P. J. Smith, P. Kyberd, P. Owens, P. Rubinov, P. Snopok, P. Warburton, R. Asfandiyarov, R. Bayes, R. Bertoni, R.B.S. Gardener, R. Gamet, R. Mazza, R. Preece, R. Tsenov, S. Boyd, S. Gourlay, S. Griffiths, S. Ishimoto, S. Middleton, S. Prestemon, S. Ramberger, S. Ricciardi, S. Virostek, S. Watson, S. Wilbur, T. A. Mohayai, T. Hartnett, T. Lord, T. Luo, T. Stanley, T. W. Bradshaw, V. Bayliss, V. J. Blackmore, V. Palladino, V. Pec, Y. Karadzhov, Y. Kuno, Y. P. Song, Y. Torun, Z. H. Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The MICE apparatus along with the calculated magnetic field, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Distribution of the beam in phase space for the 6-140 Full LH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The distributions of measured muon amplitudes. The upstream distributions are shown by orange [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Downstream to upstream ratio of number of events. A ratio greater than unity in the beam core [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The upstream and downstream normalised beam density quantiles, indicated by orange and green [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Distribution of amplitudes with corrected and uncorrected distribution shown for the 10-140 LH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

High-brightness muon beams of energy comparable to those produced by state-of-the-art electron, proton and ion accelerators have yet to be realised. Such beams have the potential to carry the search for new phenomena in lepton-antilepton collisions to extremely high energy and also to provide uniquely well-characterised neutrino beams. A muon beam may be created through the decay of pions produced in the interaction of a proton beam with a target. To produce a high-brightness beam from such a source requires that the phase space volume occupied by the muons be reduced (cooled). Ionization cooling is the novel technique by which it is proposed to cool the beam. The Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment collaboration has constructed a section of an ionization cooling cell and used it to provide the first demonstration of ionization cooling. We present these ground-breaking measurements.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports that the MICE collaboration has constructed a section of an ionization cooling cell and used it to provide the first demonstration of ionization cooling, presenting the associated ground-breaking measurements of beam emittance reduction.

Significance. If substantiated with quantitative data and systematic controls, the result would be highly significant for accelerator physics: it supplies the first experimental validation of ionization cooling, a technique essential for producing high-brightness muon beams suitable for lepton colliders and precision neutrino sources. The work is an experimental measurement rather than a derivation, providing direct empirical evidence.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of a successful demonstration supplies no quantitative emittance values, error bars, control measurements, or data-selection criteria, so the numerical support for the central claim cannot be assessed from the provided text.
  2. [Results] The attribution of any observed upstream-to-downstream emittance change to ionization energy loss in the absorber (rather than beam transport, multiple scattering in windows/trackers, or reconstruction biases) requires a full end-to-end simulation including all material and magnetic fields together with a quantified systematic error budget smaller than the cooling signal; without this the weakest assumption remains untested.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review and for highlighting areas where the presentation of our results can be strengthened. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim of a successful demonstration supplies no quantitative emittance values, error bars, control measurements, or data-selection criteria, so the numerical support for the central claim cannot be assessed from the provided text.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract is too concise and does not convey the quantitative support present in the body of the paper. The Results section reports the measured transverse emittance reduction (with statistical and systematic uncertainties), the no-absorber control data, and the event-selection criteria. In the revised manuscript we will expand the abstract to include the key measured values and uncertainties so that the central claim can be assessed from the abstract alone. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] The attribution of any observed upstream-to-downstream emittance change to ionization energy loss in the absorber (rather than beam transport, multiple scattering in windows/trackers, or reconstruction biases) requires a full end-to-end simulation including all material and magnetic fields together with a quantified systematic error budget smaller than the cooling signal; without this the weakest assumption remains untested.

    Authors: The analysis presented in the manuscript is based on a complete end-to-end Monte Carlo simulation of the entire beam line that incorporates all materials (including the absorber, windows and trackers), the magnetic fields, and the detector response. The simulation is used both to correct for reconstruction biases and to propagate the systematic uncertainties. The resulting systematic error budget is quantified in the paper and is smaller than the observed cooling signal; the no-absorber control data further isolate the contribution from ionization energy loss. We will revise the text to make the connection between the simulation, the error budget and the control measurements more explicit. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental measurement with no derivation chain

full rationale

This is an experimental paper reporting direct measurements of muon beam emittance reduction in an ionization cooling cell. No mathematical derivation, ansatz, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or self-citation load-bearing step exists in the claimed result. The central claim rests on upstream/downstream tracker data and comparison to simulation, which are external benchmarks rather than self-referential. The result is self-contained against measured observables and does not reduce to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the correctness of the beam-emittance measurement chain and on the assumption that the observed reduction is caused by the cooling cell rather than by other beam-line elements.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard accelerator-physics assumptions that emittance can be extracted from tracker data with known systematics.
    The demonstration presupposes established methods for measuring transverse emittance in a muon beam line.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 6375 in / 1065 out tokens · 21801 ms · 2026-05-24T18:48:36.460426+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Muon beams towards muonium physics: progress and prospects

    hep-ex 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 1.0

    A review summarizing recent progress in high-intensity polarized muon beams for precision muonium physics, new physics searches, and materials science applications.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 20 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    The production of high speed protons without the use of high voltages,

    E. O. Lawrence and M. S. Livingston, “The production of high speed protons without the use of high voltages,” Phys. Rev. 38 (1931) 834

  2. [2]

    The Emission of Alpha-Particles from Various Targets Bombarded by Deutons of High Speed,

    G. N. Lewis, M. S. Livingston, and E. O. Lawrence, “The Emission of Alpha-Particles from Various Targets Bombarded by Deutons of High Speed,”Phys. Rev. 44 (1933) 55–56

  3. [3]

    Method and apparatus for the acceleration of ions,

    E. O. Lawrence, “Method and apparatus for the acceleration of ions,” US Patent 1,948,384 (1934)

  4. [4]

    On the apparatus for the multiple acceleration of light ions to high speed,

    E. O. Lawrence and D. Cooksey, “On the apparatus for the multiple acceleration of light ions to high speed,” Phys. Rev. 50 (1936) 1131–1140

  5. [5]

    The ‘gigator’–a proposed new circular accelerator for heavy particles,

    R. Wider ¨oe, “The ‘gigator’–a proposed new circular accelerator for heavy particles,” Phys. Rev. 72 (1947) 978

  6. [6]

    Das Betatron,

    R. Wider ¨oe, “Das Betatron,” Z. Angew. Phys. 5 (1953) 187–200. 10

  7. [7]

    A High-Energy High-Luminosityµ+−µ− Collider,

    D. V . Neuffer and R. B. Palmer, “A High-Energy High-Luminosityµ+−µ− Collider,” in Proceedings of the 4th European Particle Accelerator Conference. 1994

  8. [8]

    Neutrino Beams from Muon Storage Rings: Characteristics and Physics Potential

    S. Geer, “Neutrino beams from muon storage rings: Characteristics and physics potential,” Phys. Rev. D57 (1998) 6989–6997, arXiv:hep-ph/9712290

  9. [9]

    Oscillation Physics with a Neutrino Factory

    M. Apollonio et al., “Oscillation physics with a neutrino factory,”arXiv:hep-ph/0210192

  10. [10]

    Recent progress in neutrino factory and muon collider research within the muon collaboration,

    M. M. Alsharo’a et al., “Recent progress in neutrino factory and muon collider research within the muon collaboration,” Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 6 (2003) 081001

  11. [11]

    Muon Colliders,

    R. B. Palmer, “Muon Colliders,” Rev. Accel. Sci. Tech.7 (2014) 137–159

  12. [12]

    Low emittance muon accelerator studies with production from positrons on target

    M. Boscolo, M. Antonelli, O. R. Blanco-Garcia, S. Guiducci, S. Liuzzo, P. Raimondi, and F. Collamati, “Low emittance muon accelerator studies with production from positrons on target,” Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 21 no. 6, (2018) 061005, arXiv:1803.06696 [physics.acc-ph]

  13. [13]

    On the feasibility of a pulsed 14 TeV c.m.e. muon collider in the LHC tunnel,

    D. Neuffer and V . Shiltsev, “On the feasibility of a pulsed 14 TeV c.m.e. muon collider in the LHC tunnel,” JINST 13 no. 10, (2018) T10003–T10003

  14. [14]

    The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - Volume 1: Executive Summary

    T. Behnke, J. E. Brau, B. Foster, J. Fuster, M. Harrison, J. M. Paterson, M. Peskin, M. Stanitzki, N. Walker, and H. Yamamoto, “The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report - V olume 1: Executive Summary,” arXiv:1306.6327 [physics.acc-ph]

  15. [15]

    The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) - 2018 Summary Report

    CLIC and CLICdp Collaboration, T. K. Charles et al., “The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) - 2018 Summary Report,” CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr.1802 (2018) 1–98, arXiv:1812.06018 [physics.acc-ph]

  16. [16]

    The Compact Linear e$^+$e$^-$ Collider (CLIC): Physics Potential

    CLIC and CLICdp Collaboration, P. Roloff, R. Franceschini, U. Schnoor, and A. Wulzer, “The Compact Linear e+e− Collider (CLIC): Physics Potential,” arXiv:1812.07986 [hep-ex]

  17. [17]

    The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) - Project Implementation Plan

    CLIC accelerator Collaboration, M. Aicheler, P. N. Burrows, N. Catalan Lasheras, R. Corsini, M. Draper, J. Osborne, D. Schulte, S. Stapnes, and M. J. Stuart, “The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) - Project Implementation Plan,” arXiv:1903.08655 [physics.acc-ph]

  18. [18]

    FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider,

    FCC Collaboration, A. Abada et al., “FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider,” Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics228 (2019) 261–623

  19. [19]

    The Large Hadron Collider 2008-2013,

    S. Myers, “The Large Hadron Collider 2008-2013,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A28 (2013) 1330035

  20. [20]

    S. Y . Lee,Accelerator Physics (Third Edition). World Scientific Publishing Co, 2012

  21. [21]

    First laser cooling of relativistic ions in a storage ring,

    S. Schr ¨oder et al., “First laser cooling of relativistic ions in a storage ring,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 64 (1990) 2901–2904

  22. [22]

    Laser cooling of a stored ion beam to 1 mK,

    J. S. Hangst, M. Kristensen, J. S. Nielsen, O. Poulsen, J. P. Schiffer, and P. Shi, “Laser cooling of a stored ion beam to 1 mK,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 1238–1241

  23. [23]

    Laser cooling of heavy ion beams,

    P. J. Channell, “Laser cooling of heavy ion beams,” Journal of Applied Physics 52 no. 6, (1981) 3791–3793

  24. [24]

    Physics and Technique of Stochastic Cooling,

    D. Mohl, G. Petrucci, L. Thorndahl, and S. Van Der Meer, “Physics and Technique of Stochastic Cooling,” Phys. Rept. 58 (1980) 73–119. 11

  25. [25]

    Stochastic Cooling Overview

    J. Marriner, “Stochastic cooling overview,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A532 (2004) 11–18, arXiv:physics/0308044 [physics]

  26. [26]

    Electron cooling: 35 years of development,

    V . V . Parkhomchuk and A. N. Skrinsky, “Electron cooling: 35 years of development,”Physics-Uspekhi 43 no. 5, (2000) 433–452. http://stacks.iop.org/1063-7869/43/i=5/a=R01

  27. [27]

    Frictional cooling: Experimental results,

    M. M ¨uhlbauer, H. Daniel, F. J. Hartmann, P. Hauser, F. Kottmann, C. Petitjean, W. Schott, D. Taqqu, and P. Wojciechowski, “Frictional cooling: Experimental results,”Hyperfine Interactions119 (1999) 305–310

  28. [28]

    A Muon Collider Scheme Based on Frictional Cooling

    H. Abramowicz, A. Caldwell, R. Galea, and S. Schlenstedt, “A Muon Collider scheme based on Frictional Cooling,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A546 (2005) 356–375, arXiv:physics/0410017

  29. [29]

    Compression and Extraction of Stopped Muons,

    D. Taqqu, “Compression and Extraction of Stopped Muons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 no. 19, (2006) 194801

  30. [30]

    Muon cooling: Longitudinal compression,

    Y . Bao, A. Antognini, W. Bertl, M. Hildebrandt, K. S. Khaw, K. Kirch, A. Papa, C. Petitjean, F. M. Piegsa, S. Ritt, K. Sedlak, A. Stoykov, and D. Taqqu, “Muon cooling: Longitudinal compression,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 224801

  31. [31]

    Cooling Methods for Beams of Charged Particles. (In Russian),

    A. N. Skrinsky and V . V . Parkhomchuk, “Cooling Methods for Beams of Charged Particles. (In Russian),” Sov. J. Part. Nucl.12 (1981) 223–247

  32. [32]

    Principles and Applications of Muon Cooling,

    D. Neuffer, “Principles and Applications of Muon Cooling,” Part. Accel. 14 (1983) 75–90

  33. [33]

    Muon front end for the neutrino factory,

    C. T. Rogers, D. Stratakis, G. Prior, S. Gilardoni, D. Neuffer, P. Snopok, A. Alekou, and J. Pasternak, “Muon front end for the neutrino factory,” Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 16 (2013) 040104

  34. [34]

    Rectilinear six-dimensional ionization cooling channel for a muon collider: A theoretical and numerical study,

    D. Stratakis and R. B. Palmer, “Rectilinear six-dimensional ionization cooling channel for a muon collider: A theoretical and numerical study,” Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 18 no. 3, (2015) 031003

  35. [35]

    Final Cooling for a High-Energy High-Luminosity Lepton Collider

    D. Neuffer, H. Sayed, J. Acosta, D. Summers, and T. Hart, “Final Cooling for a High-Energy High-Luminosity Lepton Collider,” JINST 12 no. 07, (2017) T07003, arXiv:1612.08960 [physics.acc-ph]

  36. [36]

    First muon acceleration using a radio frequency accelerator

    S. Bae et al., “First muon acceleration using a radio frequency accelerator,” Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 21 no. 5, (2018) 050101, arXiv:1803.07891 [physics.acc-ph]

  37. [37]

    Neutron Source with Emittance Recovery Internal Target,

    Y . Mori, Y . Ishi, Y . Kuriyama, Y . Sakurai, T. Uesugi, K. Okabe, and I. Sakai, “Neutron Source with Emittance Recovery Internal Target,” inProceedings of the 23rd Particle Accelerator Conference. 2009. http://accelconf.web.cern.ch/AccelConf/PAC2009/papers/th4gac04.pdf

  38. [38]

    International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment

    MICE Collaboration, “International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment.” http://mice.iit.edu

  39. [39]

    Beam envelope equations for cooling of muons in solenoid fields,

    G. Penn and J. S. Wurtele, “Beam envelope equations for cooling of muons in solenoid fields,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 764

  40. [40]

    Figure of merit for muon cooling – an algorithm for particle counting in coupled phase planes,

    E. B. Holzer, “Figure of merit for muon cooling – an algorithm for particle counting in coupled phase planes,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A532 (2004) 270–274

  41. [41]

    Rogers, Beam Dynamics in an Ionisation Cooling Channel

    C. Rogers, Beam Dynamics in an Ionisation Cooling Channel. PhD dissertation, Imperial College, London, 2008. 12

  42. [42]

    Multivariate k-nearest neighbor density estimates,

    Y . Mack and M. Rosenblatt, “Multivariate k-nearest neighbor density estimates,”Journal of Multivariate Analysis 9 no. 1, (1979) 1 – 15

  43. [43]

    Drielsma, Measurement of the increase in phase space density of a muon beam through ionization cooling

    F. Drielsma, Measurement of the increase in phase space density of a muon beam through ionization cooling. PhD thesis, University of Geneva, 2018

  44. [44]

    The MICE Muon Beam on ISIS and the beam-line instrumentation of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment

    MICE Collaboration, M. Bogomilov et al., “The MICE Muon Beam on ISIS and the beam-line instrumentation of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment,” JINST 7 (2012) P05009, arXiv:1203.4089 [physics.acc-ph]

  45. [45]

    Characterisation of the muon beams for the Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment

    MICE Collaboration, D. Adams et al., “Characterisation of the muon beams for the Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment,” Eur. Phys. J.C73 no. 10, (2013) 2582, arXiv:1306.1509 [physics.acc-ph]

  46. [46]

    Pion contamination in the MICE muon beam

    MICE Collaboration, M. Bogomilov et al., “Pion Contamination in the MICE Muon Beam,” JINST 11 no. 03, (2016) P03001, arXiv:1511.00556 [physics.ins-det]

  47. [47]

    The design and performance of an improved target for MICE,

    C. Booth, P. Hodgson, J. Langlands, E. Overton, M. Robinson, P. Smith, G. Barber, K. Long, B. Shepherd, E. Capocci, C. MacWaters, and J. Tarrant, “The design and performance of an improved target for MICE,” JINST 11 no. 05, (2016) P05006–P05006

  48. [48]

    The ISIS Spallation Neutron and Muon Source - The first thirty-three years,

    J. Thomason, “The ISIS Spallation Neutron and Muon Source - The first thirty-three years,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A917 (2019) 61 – 67

  49. [49]

    The liquid-hydrogen absorber for MICE

    MICE Collaboration, V . Baylisset al., “The liquid-hydrogen absorber for MICE,” JINST 13 no. 09, (2018) T09008, arXiv:1807.03019 [physics.acc-ph]

  50. [50]

    Influence of space-charge fields on the cooling process of muon beams,

    D. Stratakis, R. B. Palmer, and D. P. Grote, “Influence of space-charge fields on the cooling process of muon beams,” Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 18 (2015) 044201

  51. [51]

    First particle-by-particle measurement of emittance in the muon ionization cooling experiment,

    MICE Collaboration, V . Blackmoreet al., “First particle-by-particle measurement of emittance in the muon ionization cooling experiment,” Eur. Phys. J. C79 no. 3, (2019) 257

  52. [52]

    The design and commissioning of the MICE upstream time-of-flight system

    MICE Collaboration, R. Bertoni et al., “The design and commissioning of the MICE upstream time-of-flight system,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A615 (2010) 14–26, arXiv:1001.4426 [physics.ins-det]

  53. [53]

    The construction of the MICE TOF2 detector,

    R. Bertoni, M. Bonesini, A. deBari, G. Cecchet, Y . Karadzhov, and R. Mazza, “The construction of the MICE TOF2 detector,” MICE Technical Note 254 (2010) . http://mice.iit.edu/micenotes/public/pdf/MICE0286/MICE0286.pdf

  54. [54]

    A cherenkov radiation detector with high density aerogels,

    L. Cremaldi, D. Sanders, P. Sonnek, D. Summers, and J. Reidy, “A cherenkov radiation detector with high density aerogels,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 56 (2009) 1475 – 1478

  55. [55]

    The design, construction and performance of the MICE scintillating fibre trackers

    M. Ellis et al., “The Design, construction and performance of the MICE scintillating fibre trackers,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A659 (2011) 136–153, arXiv:1005.3491 [physics.ins-det]

  56. [56]

    The reconstruction software for the MICE scintillating fibre trackers

    A. Dobbs, C. Hunt, K. Long, E. Santos, M. A. Uchida, P. Kyberd, C. Heidt, S. Blot, and E. Overton, “The reconstruction software for the MICE scintillating fibre trackers,” JINST 11 no. 12, (2016) T12001, arXiv:1610.05161 [physics.ins-det]

  57. [57]

    Electron-Muon Ranger: performance in the MICE Muon Beam

    MICE Collaboration, D. Adams et al., “Electron-Muon Ranger: performance in the MICE Muon Beam,” JINST 10 no. 12, (2015) P12012, arXiv:1510.08306 [physics.ins-det] . 13

  58. [58]

    The design and construction of the MICE Electron-Muon Ranger

    R. Asfandiyarov et al., “The design and construction of the MICE Electron-Muon Ranger,” JINST 11 no. 10, (2016) T10007, arXiv:1607.04955 [physics.ins-det]

  59. [59]

    Photon-Counting Solid-State Photomultiplier,

    M. Petroff and M. Stapelbroek, “Photon-Counting Solid-State Photomultiplier,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 36 no. 1, Part 1, (1989) 158–162

  60. [60]

    High-Energy Particle Tracking using Scintillation Fibers and Solid-State Photomultipliers,

    M. Petroff and M. Atac, “High-Energy Particle Tracking using Scintillation Fibers and Solid-State Photomultipliers,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 36 no. 1, Part 1, (1989) 163–164

  61. [61]

    GEANT4: A Simulation toolkit,

    S. Agostinelli et al., “GEANT4: A Simulation toolkit,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250–303

  62. [62]

    Geant4 developments and applications,

    J. Allison et al., “Geant4 developments and applications,” IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 53 (2006) 270

  63. [63]

    MAUS: The MICE Analysis User Software,

    R. Asfandiyarov et al., “MAUS: The MICE Analysis User Software,”JINST 14 (2019) T04005–T04005, arXiv:1812.02674 [physics.comp-ph] . 14 Methods Data-taking and reconstruction Data were buffered in the front-end electronics and read out after each target actuation. Data storage was triggered by a coincidence of signals in the photmulti- plier tubes (PMTs) s...