Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 59 references

Effect of superconducting fluctuations on nonreciprocal dichroism and gyrotropy

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Above Tc, fluctuating Cooper pairs give a 2D noncentrosymmetric superconductor a nonreciprocal, wavevector-odd conductivity that peaks at the pair decay rate and grows as 1/(T-Tc).

desk verdict Clean closed-form AL calculation of fluctuation gyrotropy (W and V) that supplies the linear-response counterpart to giant MCA/SDE near Tc; soft only on the usual unquantified γ2 premise. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.10464 v1 pith:3WSMN2QI submitted 2026-07-11 cond-mat.supr-con

Alex Levchenko This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords superconductingfluctuationsnonreciprocaldichroismgyrotropyAslamazov-LarkinLifshitzinvariantparticle-holeasymmetryMoS2TDGL
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that, just above the superconducting transition, thermally fluctuating Cooper pairs produce a linear-response nonreciprocal conductivity that is odd in wavevector. Using a time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau description that includes particle-hole asymmetry and the cubic Lifshitz invariant allowed by trigonal symmetry, it obtains the Aslamazov-Larkin contribution in closed form for all frequencies. The dissipative piece is directional dichroism: odd in frequency, vanishing at dc, and peaking when the probe frequency matches the Cooper-pair decay rate. Its Kramers-Kronig partner is gyrotropic birefringence that remains finite at zero frequency and diverges as the temperature approaches Tc. Both effects require broken inversion and time-reversal symmetry, depend on the same particle-hole asymmetry that controls the fluctuation Hall effect, and share the microscopic origin of the superconducting diode effect and giant magnetochiral anisotropy. The critical upturn is predicted to dominate the smooth normal-state background, making it a measurable signature in gated MoS2 films via optics or nitrogen-vacancy noise magnetometry.

What carries the argument

The Aslamazov-Larkin current-current loop built from the statistical pair propagator of TDGL theory with complex relaxation constant gamma = gamma1 + i gamma2 and cubic Lifshitz invariant w(q). Expanding the frequency-integrated kernel to linear order in gamma2 and in the inversion-odd velocity content of k yields the compact odd response that is then integrated over momentum to produce the closed-form functions W(omega) and V(omega).

What would settle it

In a gated MoS2 film near Tc, measure the direction-odd absorption Delta A or phase shift Delta phi of counter-propagating waves (or the field-reversed magnetic noise of an NV center) and check whether a critical 1/(T-Tc) upturn appears with the predicted nonmonotonic frequency profile peaking near the GL relaxation rate.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Fluctuation-induced Cooper pairs above Tc generate a nonreciprocal, odd-in-wavevector component of the spatially dispersive conductivity. Its dissipative part is proportional to eta Bz kx times an odd frequency function W that peaks near omega tau_GL ~ 2; its reactive part remains finite at omega = 0 and scales as 1/epsilon, where epsilon = (T - Tc)/Tc. The response is controlled by the product of particle-hole asymmetry and the cubic Lifshitz invariant and has the same trigonal tensor structure as the normal-state gyrotropy of the same band model.

Load-bearing premise

The entire nonreciprocal signal is proportional to the imaginary part of the TDGL relaxation constant (particle-hole asymmetry); if that asymmetry vanishes, both dichroism and birefringence disappear.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper computes the Aslamazov–Larkin contribution to the spatially dispersive conductivity of a 2D noncentrosymmetric superconductor above Tc within Gaussian TDGL theory that includes particle-hole asymmetry (complex γ) and the cubic Lifshitz invariant of the D3h point group. It shows that the conductivity acquires a nonreciprocal, odd-in-k component: the dissipative part is odd in frequency, vanishes at dc, and is controlled by the closed-form function W(ϖ) that peaks near ωτ_GL ≃ 2, while the reactive (Kramers–Kronig) partner V(ϖ) remains finite at ω → 0 and scales as 1/ϵ. Both effects require broken inversion and time-reversal symmetries and are proportional to γ2, in direct analogy with the fluctuation Hall effect. The same band model is used to evaluate the normal-state gyrotropy as a smooth baseline, and the critical enhancement is framed for gated MoS2 and NV-center noise spectroscopy.

Significance. If correct, the work supplies a concrete, closed-form linear-response counterpart to the fluctuation-enhanced magnetochiral anisotropy and superconducting diode effect already observed near Tc in noncentrosymmetric 2D materials. The analytic frequency functions W and V, the 3:(−1) channel ratio, the 1/ϵ scaling of the static birefringence, and the explicit normal-state baseline are parameter-free once γ2, η, and τ_GL are regarded as material inputs; they therefore constitute falsifiable predictions for optical dichroism/birefringence and for direction-odd magnetic noise. The calculation cleanly places fluctuation gyrotropy in the same universality class as the fluctuation Hall effect and strengthens the case that Lifshitz invariants play the role of band geometry in the fluctuation regime.

minor comments (5)
  1. The magnitude of γ2/γ1 is left as a free material parameter (Eq. 7) and is not estimated microscopically for the MoS2 band model. A short order-of-magnitude estimate (or a pointer to existing microscopic calculations of ∂lnTc/∂lnμ) would help experimental readers judge observability.
  2. Figure 1 is clear, but the caption and main text could explicitly mark the location of the maximum of W (ϖ ≃ 2.07) and the value Wmax ≃ 0.886 so that the peak frequency can be read off without re-deriving the function.
  3. In Sec. V the thin-film transmission formulae for ΔA and Δφ are given under |2πσ/c| ≪ 1; a brief remark on the range of validity for typical gated-TMD sheet conductivities near Tc would be useful.
  4. Appendix A recovers the same 3:(−1) ratio as the AL calculation; a one-sentence cross-reference in the main text would make this structural parallel more visible.
  5. A few minor notational points: the definition of τ_GL = γ1/(2a) appears after its first use in the discussion of W; the wave-vector convention for the normal-state warping parameter Λ could be stated once in the main text for readers who skip the appendix.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the AL gyrotropic conductivity is derived from the TDGL free energy, complex relaxation constant, and cubic LI by direct evaluation of the current correlator; self-citations supply context and the form of the LI but do not force the result.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The Gaussian free energy (3) with cubic Lifshitz invariant (4), the TDGL dynamics with complex γ (6–7), the FDT noise (8), the pair propagator (9), and the classical Kubo formula (11) are stated as inputs. The odd-in-k kernel is obtained by expanding the frequency integral to linear order in γ2 and k·v (16), after which the momentum integral with the cubic warping yields the closed-form W(ϖ) (19) and its Kramers–Kronig partner V (23) together with the 3:(-1) channel ratio and the 1/ϵ scaling of the static birefringence (25). These steps are algebraic and do not equate the target conductivity to any fitted quantity or to a prior result of the same authors. Self-citations ([9], [27], [28], [42], [55]) locate the cubic LI, the particle-hole-asymmetry factor, and the MCA/SDE analogy, but the gyrotropic conductivity itself is recomputed from the AL bubble; Appendix A independently evaluates the normal-state baseline for the same band model, and Appendix B shows the kinetic LI is sub-leading by one power of ϵ. No uniqueness theorem is imported, no ansatz is smuggled, and no prediction reduces by construction. A score of 1 reflects only the presence of non-load-bearing self-citations that supply background.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is pure analytic theory. Magnitude of the effect is controlled by two material parameters (γ2/γ1 and η) that are not fitted here; the functional form and critical scaling follow from standard TDGL plus symmetry-allowed cubic LI. No new particles or forces are postulated. The load-bearing domain assumptions are the validity of Gaussian TDGL near Tc, the presence of nonzero particle-hole asymmetry, and the dominance of the AL channel.

free parameters (2)
  • γ2/γ1 (particle-hole asymmetry ratio)
    Controls the overall scale of both dichroism and birefringence; left as a material-dependent input proportional to ∂ln Tc/∂ln μ. Not computed microscopically for MoS2 in this work.
  • η (cubic Lifshitz invariant coefficient)
    Sets the strength of the inversion-odd pair dispersion; microscopically η Bz ∝ λ Δ_SO Δ_Z / Tc², but the prefactor is not evaluated numerically here.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Gaussian time-dependent Ginzburg–Landau dynamics with complex relaxation constant γ = γ1 + i γ2 correctly captures the leading Aslamazov–Larkin conductivity near Tc.
    Invoked from Sec. II onward; standard for gapless or pair-breaking regimes but omits MT and DOS channels.
  • domain assumption For D3h symmetry the leading inversion-odd term is the cubic Lifshitz invariant w = η Bz (qx³ − 3 qx qy²); linear invariants are forbidden.
    Stated in Sec. II and used to obtain the trigonal tensor structure of σ_odd.
  • domain assumption Fluctuation-dissipation theorem locks the Langevin noise to the dissipative part of γ; nonreciprocal kinetic corrections do not alter the leading 1/ϵ singularity.
    Eq. (8) and Appendix B; used to justify that only γ2 unlocks the odd-in-k response.
  • standard math Onsager reciprocity σ_ij(k,ω,B) = σ_ji(−k,ω,−B) and Kramers–Kronig relations for causal response functions.
    Used to classify tensors and to obtain V from W via the analytic function G(ϖ).
  • domain assumption AL process dominates over Maki–Thompson and density-of-states contributions in the presence of pair breaking (magnetic field).
    Stated in Sec. II; standard lore but not re-derived here for the gyrotropic channel.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effect of superconducting fluctuations on nonreciprocal dichroism and gyrotropy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3WSMN2QI

@misc{pith2026260710464,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effect of superconducting fluctuations on nonreciprocal dichroism and gyrotropy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3WSMN2QI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.10464}
}
abstract

We study the spatially dispersive conductivity of a two-dimensional noncentrosymmetric superconductor, demonstrating that it acquires a nonreciprocal, odd-in-wavevector component from fluctuation-induced Cooper pairs above the critical temperature $T_c$. Utilizing time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory generalized to include particle-hole asymmetry and the cubic Lifshitz invariant of trigonal superconductors, we compute the Aslamazov-Larkin contribution to the gyrotropic conductivity in closed form, including its complete frequency dependence. The dissipative part describes nonreciprocal directional dichroism: it is odd in frequency and displays a nonmonotonic dependence, peaking at frequencies comparable to the decay rate of fluctuating Cooper pairs. Its Kramers-Kronig dual component describes gyrotropic birefringence, which remains finite in the static limit and is strongly enhanced as the temperature approaches $T_c$. Both effects require simultaneously broken inversion and time-reversal symmetries, are dependent on particle-hole asymmetry in close analogy to the fluctuation Hall effect, and trace to the same asymmetric Cooper-pair dispersion responsible for the superconducting diode effect and the giant magnetochiral anisotropy observed near $T_c$. This critical enhancement dominates over the smooth normal-state gyrotropy, which we evaluate for the same band model as a baseline. Finally, we frame our analysis within the context of gated transition metal dichalcogenides like MoS$_2$, discussing the implications for probing superconducting dynamics through nitrogen-vacancy-center quantum noise spectroscopy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.10464 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Frequency functions of the nonreciprocal fluctuation conduc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Normalized frequency profiles of the nonreciprocal con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    and in polar SrTiO 3 [13]. These observations triggered multiple theoretical studies of the fluctuation MCA [25–28], nonlinear Hall effect [29–31], and of photogalvanic effects [14, 15] arising from fluctuations. The common microscopic origin of the enhancement was identified in the Lifshitz in- variants (LI) of the Ginzburg-Landau (GL) free energy: terms...

    arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Both functions are shown in Fig. 1. V . DISCUSSION AND OUTLOOK The dependence of the effect onγ2 is not an artifact of the TDGL approximation but has the same origin as the well- known suppression of the fluctuation Hall and anomalous Nernst responses at particle-hole symmetry [40, 41]. With realγthe AL bubble is built from the squared modulus of the pair...

  3. [3]

    Nonreciprocal re- sponses from non-centrosymmetric quantum materials,

    Yoshinori Tokura and Naoto Nagaosa, “Nonreciprocal re- sponses from non-centrosymmetric quantum materials,” Nat. Commun.9, 3740 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    Symmetry breaking and nonlinear electric transport in van der Waals nanostructures,

    Toshiya Ideue and Yoshihiro Iwasa, “Symmetry breaking and nonlinear electric transport in van der Waals nanostructures,” Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.12, 201–223 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    Nonreciprocal transport and optical phenomena in quantum materials,

    Naoto Nagaosa and Youichi Yanase, “Nonreciprocal transport and optical phenomena in quantum materials,” Annu. Rev. Con- dens. Matter Phys.15, 63–83 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    Observation of superconducting diode effect,

    Fuyuki Ando, Yuta Miyasaka, Tian Li, Jun Ishizuka, Tomonori Arakawa, Yoichi Shiota, Takahiro Moriyama, Youichi Yanase, and Teruo Ono, “Observation of superconducting diode effect,” Nature584, 373 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Intrinsic superconducting diode effect,

    Akito Daido, Yuhei Ikeda, and Youichi Yanase, “Intrinsic superconducting diode effect,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 037001 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    Supercurrent diode effect and finite-momentum superconductors,

    Noah F. Q. Yuan and Liang Fu, “Supercurrent diode effect and finite-momentum superconductors,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 8 119, e2119548119 (2022)

    2022

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Theory of the supercurrent diode effect in Rashba superconductors with arbitrary disorder,

    S. Ili ´c and F. S. Bergeret, “Theory of the supercurrent diode effect in Rashba superconductors with arbitrary disorder,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 177001 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    The superconducting diode effect,

    Muhammad Nadeem, Michael S. Fuhrer, and Xiaolin Wang, “The superconducting diode effect,” Nat. Rev. Phys.5, 558–577 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    Theories of super- conducting diode effects,

    Daniel Shaffer and Alex Levchenko, “Theories of super- conducting diode effects,” (2025), arXiv:2510.25864 [cond- mat.supr-con]

    2025

  4. [12]

    Electrical mag- netochiral anisotropy,

    G. L. J. A. Rikken, J. F ¨olling, and P. Wyder, “Electrical mag- netochiral anisotropy,” Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 236602 (2001)

    2001

  5. [13]

    Observation of magneto- chiral dichroism,

    G. L. J. A. Rikken and E. Raupach, “Observation of magneto- chiral dichroism,” Nature390, 493 (1997)

    1997

  6. [14]

    Nonreciprocal charge transport in noncen- trosymmetric superconductors,

    Ryohei Wakatsuki, Yu Saito, Shintaro Hoshino, Yuki M. Ita- hashi, Toshiya Ideue, Motohiko Ezawa, Yoshihiro Iwasa, and Naoto Nagaosa, “Nonreciprocal charge transport in noncen- trosymmetric superconductors,” Sci. Adv.3, e1602390 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    Nonreciprocal trans- port in gate-induced polar superconductor SrTiO3,

    Yuki M. Itahashi, Toshiya Ideue, Yu Saito, Junichi Shiogai, Tsutomu Nojima, and Yoshihiro Iwasa, “Nonreciprocal trans- port in gate-induced polar superconductor SrTiO3,” Sci. Adv.6, eaay9120 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Coherent pho- togalvanic effect in fluctuating superconductors,

    V . M. Kovalev, K. Sonowal, and I. G. Savenko, “Coherent pho- togalvanic effect in fluctuating superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B 103, 024513 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Photogalvanic transport in fluctuating Ising superconductors,

    A. V . Parafilo, M. V . Boev, V . M. Kovalev, and I. G. Savenko, “Photogalvanic transport in fluctuating Ising superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B106, 144502 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Photogal- vanic phenomena in superconductors supporting intrinsic diode effect,

    S. V . Mironov, A. S. Mel’nikov, and A. I. Buzdin, “Photogal- vanic phenomena in superconductors supporting intrinsic diode effect,” Phys. Rev. B109, L220503 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes. I

    Lars Onsager, “Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes. I.” Phys. Rev.37, 405 (1931)

    1931

  12. [20]

    L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskii,Electrody- namics of Continuous Media, 2nd ed. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1984)

    1984

  13. [21]

    Theory of gyrotropic bire- fringence,

    R. M. Hornreich and S. Shtrikman, “Theory of gyrotropic bire- fringence,” Phys. Rev.171, 1065 (1968)

    1968

  14. [22]

    Chiral magnetic effect and natural optical activity in metals with or without Weyl points,

    Jing Ma and D. A. Pesin, “Chiral magnetic effect and natural optical activity in metals with or without Weyl points,” Phys. Rev. B92, 235205 (2015)

    2015

  15. [23]

    Gyrotropic magnetic effect and the magnetic moment on the Fermi sur- face,

    Shudan Zhong, Joel E. Moore, and Ivo Souza, “Gyrotropic magnetic effect and the magnetic moment on the Fermi sur- face,” Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 077201 (2016)

    2016

  16. [24]

    Orbital optical activity in noncentrosymmetric metals and superconductors,

    Koki Shinada and Robert Peters, “Orbital optical activity in noncentrosymmetric metals and superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B110, 085162 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Anomalous Hall effect,

    Naoto Nagaosa, Jairo Sinova, Shigeki Onoda, A. H. MacDon- ald, and N. P. Ong, “Anomalous Hall effect,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1539 (2010)

    2010

  18. [26]

    Berry phase ef- fects on electronic properties,

    Di Xiao, Ming-Che Chang, and Qian Niu, “Berry phase ef- fects on electronic properties,” Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959–2007 (2010)

    1959

  19. [27]

    Nonreciprocal charge transport in two- dimensional noncentrosymmetric superconductors,

    Shintaro Hoshino, Ryohei Wakatsuki, Keita Hamamoto, and Naoto Nagaosa, “Nonreciprocal charge transport in two- dimensional noncentrosymmetric superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B98, 054510 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    Nonreciprocal current in noncentrosymmetric Rashba superconductors,

    Ryohei Wakatsuki and Naoto Nagaosa, “Nonreciprocal current in noncentrosymmetric Rashba superconductors,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 026601 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    Magnetochiral anisotropy in strained super- conducting transition metal dichalcogenides,

    Joaquim Telles de Miranda, Maxim Khodas, and Alex Levchenko, “Magnetochiral anisotropy in strained super- conducting transition metal dichalcogenides,” (2026), arXiv:2606.05302 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2026 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Electrical magnetochiral anisotropy in Rashba superconductors,

    Joaquim Telles de Miranda, Maxim Khodas, and Alex Levchenko, “Electrical magnetochiral anisotropy in Rashba superconductors,” (2026), arXiv:2606.19421 [cond-mat.supr- con]

    2026 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Rectification and nonlinear Hall effect by fluctuating finite-momentum Cooper pairs,

    Akito Daido and Youichi Yanase, “Rectification and nonlinear Hall effect by fluctuating finite-momentum Cooper pairs,” Phys. Rev. Res.6, L022009 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Photovoltaic Hall effect in two-dimensional fluctuating superconductors,

    M. V . Boeva and V . M. Kovalev, “Photovoltaic Hall effect in two-dimensional fluctuating superconductors,” JETP Letters 120, 494–498 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Enhanced nonlin- ear Hall effect by Cooper pairs near the superconducting phase transition,

    Zi-Hao Dong, Hui Yang, and Yi Zhang, “Enhanced nonlin- ear Hall effect by Cooper pairs near the superconducting phase transition,” Phys. Rev. B111, 155120 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    Helical phases in super- conductors,

    V . P. Mineev and K. V . Samokhin, “Helical phases in super- conductors,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.105, 747 (1994), [Sov. Phys. JETP78, 401 (1994)]

    1994

  27. [35]

    Helical vortex phase in the noncentrosymmetric CePt3Si,

    R. P. Kaur, D. F. Agterberg, and M. Sigrist, “Helical vortex phase in the noncentrosymmetric CePt3Si,” Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 137002 (2005)

    2005

  28. [36]

    Magnetoelectric effects, helical phases, and FFLO phases,

    D. F. Agterberg, “Magnetoelectric effects, helical phases, and FFLO phases,” inNon-Centrosymmetric Superconductors, edited by E. Bauer and M. Sigrist (Springer, Berlin, 2012) pp. 155–170, arXiv:1106.0352

    2012 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Superconductivity and spin-orbit coupling in non- centrosymmetric materials: a review,

    M. Smidman, M. B. Salamon, H. Q. Yuan, and D. F. Agterberg, “Superconductivity and spin-orbit coupling in non- centrosymmetric materials: a review,” Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 036501 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    A phenomeno- logical theory of superconductor diodes,

    James Jun He, Yukio Tanaka, and K. T. Law, “A phenomeno- logical theory of superconductor diodes,” New J. Phys.24, 053014 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Supercurrent diode effect in helical superconduc- tors,

    Jaglul Hasan, Daniel Shaffer, Maxim Khodas, and Alex Levchenko, “Supercurrent diode effect in helical superconduc- tors,” Phys. Rev. B110, 024508 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Evidence for two-dimensional Ising superconductivity in gated MoS2,

    J. M. Lu, O. Zheliuk, I. Leermakers, N. F. Q. Yuan, U. Zeitler, K. T. Law, and J. T. Ye, “Evidence for two-dimensional Ising superconductivity in gated MoS2,” Science350, 1353 (2015)

    2015

  33. [41]

    Superconductivity pro- tected by spin-valley locking in ion-gated MoS2,

    Yu Saito, Yasuharu Nakamura, Mohammad S. Bahramy, Yoshimitsu Kohama, Jianting Ye, Yuichi Kasahara, Yuji Nak- agawa, Masaru Onga, Masashi Tokunaga, Tsutomu Nojima, Youichi Yanase, and Yoshihiro Iwasa, “Superconductivity pro- tected by spin-valley locking in ion-gated MoS2,” Nat...

    2016

  34. [42]

    Fluctuation of the order parameter and Hall effect,

    Hidetoshi Fukuyama, Hiromichi Ebisawa, and Toshihiko Tsuzuki, “Fluctuation of the order parameter and Hall effect,” Prog. Theor. Phys.46, 1028 (1971)

    1971

  35. [43]

    Gauge invariance and transport properties in superconductors aboveT c,

    A. G. Aronov, S. Hikami, and A. I. Larkin, “Gauge invariance and transport properties in superconductors aboveT c,” Phys. Rev. B51, 3880 (1995)

    1995

  36. [44]

    Fluctuational anomalous Hall and Nernst effects in superconductors,

    Songci Li and Alex Levchenko, “Fluctuational anomalous Hall and Nernst effects in superconductors,” Ann. Phys.417, 168137 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    The influence of fluctuation pairing of electrons on the conductivity of normal metal,

    L. G. Aslamazov and A. I. Larkin, “The influence of fluctuation pairing of electrons on the conductivity of normal metal,” Phys. Lett. A26, 238 (1968)

    1968

  38. [46]

    The critical fluctuation of the order parameter in type-ii superconductors,

    Kazumi Maki, “The critical fluctuation of the order parameter in type-ii superconductors,” Prog. Theor. Phys.39, 897 (1968)

    1968

  39. [47]

    Microwave, flux flow, and fluctuation resistance of dirty type-II superconductors,

    Richard S. Thompson, “Microwave, flux flow, and fluctuation resistance of dirty type-II superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B1, 327 (1970)

    1970

  40. [48]

    Effect of fluctuations on electronic properties above the superconducting transition,

    Elihu Abrahams, Martha Redi, and James W. F. Woo, “Effect of fluctuations on electronic properties above the superconducting transition,” Phys. Rev. B1, 208–213 (1970)

    1970

  41. [49]

    A. I. Larkin and A. A. Varlamov,Theory of Fluctuations in Su- perconductors(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2005). 9

    2005

  42. [50]

    Diamagnetic susceptibility at the transition to the superconducting state,

    Albert Schmid, “Diamagnetic susceptibility at the transition to the superconducting state,” Phys. Rev.180, 527 (1969)

    1969

  43. [51]

    Generalization of the Ginzburg–Landau equations for non-stationary problems in the case of alloys with paramagnetic impurities,

    L. P. Gor’kov and G. M. Eliashberg, “Generalization of the Ginzburg–Landau equations for non-stationary problems in the case of alloys with paramagnetic impurities,” Sov. Phys. - JETP 27, 328 (1968)

    1968

  44. [52]

    (11) therefore resides in the propagators

    Hermiticity fixes the exact vertex to the symmetrized combina- tion [vi(q+k/2)+v i(q−k/2)]/2, which is even inkto all orders and reduces tov i(q) at linear order; all odd-in-kdependence of Eq. (11) therefore resides in the propagators

  45. [53]

    Fluctuation conductiv- ity in intercalated superconductors,

    L. G. Aslamazov and A. A. Varlamov, “Fluctuation conductiv- ity in intercalated superconductors,” Journal of Low Tempera- ture Physics38, 223–241 (1980)

    1980

  46. [54]

    Characterizing two-dimensional supercon- ductivity via nanoscale noise magnetometry with single-spin qubits,

    Pavel E. Dolgirev, Shubhayu Chatterjee, Ilya Esterlis, Alexan- der A. Zibrov, Mikhail D. Lukin, Norman Y . Yao, and Eugene Demler, “Characterizing two-dimensional supercon- ductivity via nanoscale noise magnetometry with single-spin qubits,” Phys. Rev. B105, 024507 (2022)

    2022

  47. [55]

    Single-spin qubit magnetic spectroscopy of two- dimensional superconductivity,

    Shubhayu Chatterjee, Pavel E. Dolgirev, Ilya Esterlis, Alexan- der A. Zibrov, Mikhail D. Lukin, Norman Y . Yao, and Eu- gene Demler, “Single-spin qubit magnetic spectroscopy of two- dimensional superconductivity,” Phys. Rev. Res.4, L012001 (2022)

    2022

  48. [56]

    Quantum noise spectroscopy of super- conducting dynamics in thin film Bi 2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ,

    Zhongyuan Liu, Ruotian Gong, Jaewon Kim, Oriana K. Dies- sel, Qiaozhi Xu, Zackary Rehfuss, Xinyi Du, Guanghui He, Ab- hishek Singh, Yun Suk Eo, Erik A. Henriksen, G. D. Gu, Nor- man Y . Yao, Francisco Machado, Sheng Ran, Shubhayu Chat- terjee, and Chong Zu, “Quantum noise spec...

    2025 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Keldysh Ginzburg- Landau action of fluctuating superconductors,

    Alex Levchenko and Alex Kamenev, “Keldysh Ginzburg- Landau action of fluctuating superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B76, 094518 (2007)

    2007

  50. [58]

    Claude [large language model],

    Anthropic, “Claude [large language model],”https:// claude.ai(2026), version: Claude Fable 5; used June–July 2026

    2026

  51. [59]

    A model for collision processes in gases. i. small amplitude processes in charged and neutral one-component systems,

    P. L. Bhatnagar, E. P. Gross, and M. Krook, “A model for collision processes in gases. i. small amplitude processes in charged and neutral one-component systems,” Phys. Rev.94, 511 (1954)

    1954

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.