Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 92 references

Discovery of Volatile Gas in the Giant Impact Disk around the 150-Myr old HD 23514

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Hot CO2 gas at ~900 K sits in the sub-au impact disk around HD 23514, and it was already there when Spitzer looked 15 years earlier.

desk verdict First CO2 in a debris disk, detected at 10 sigma in JWST and seen in Spitzer archival data, with model-dependent temperature/radius claims that are softer than the abstract suggests. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.20919 v2 pith:3WW6QHBC submitted 2025-06-26 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR

Kate Y. L. Su , Attila Moór , Chengyan Xie , Ilaria Pascucci , George H. Rieke , Ágnes Kóspál , Mark C. Wyatt , Péter Ábrahám
show 3 more authors
Luca Matrà Zoe Roumeliotis D. J. Wilner
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR
keywords circumstellargasextremedebrisdisksgiantimpactsilicadustcarbondioxideHD23514mid-infraredspectroscopyJWSTMIRI
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

HD 23514, an F5V star in the 150-million-year-old Pleiades cluster, hosts one of the rare 'giant impact disks' whose mid-infrared spectrum is dominated by tiny silica grains. This paper reports that the same disk also contains hot carbon dioxide gas, seen in the JWST spectrum as the CO2 Q-branch at 14.98 μm at 10σ, along with weaker CO and tentative water and ammonia. The gas sits at about 891 K in a region only ~0.05 au from the star, and the same CO2 emission is present in a Spitzer spectrum taken 15 years earlier at 4.3σ significance. Because unshielded molecules at that distance are destroyed by starlight in less than a year, the gas must be continuously replenished or shielded. The authors argue that a past giant impact or atmospheric-stripping event involving bodies with carbonaceous-chondrite-like volatile content can simultaneously supply the volatile gas and the submicron silica dust, with consequences for how volatiles are retained during terrestrial planet formation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the CO2 ro-vibrational band complex near 15 μm: the unresolved Q-branch at 14.98 μm together with the P and R branches. It is isolated by subtracting a smoothed dust continuum from the MIRI/MRS spectrum, then modeled with an isothermal plane-parallel LTE slab whose three parameters are emitting area, column density, and temperature. That model yields $R_{\rm em}\approx 0.052$ au, $N\approx 1.4\times10^{18}$ cm$^{-2}$, and $T_{\rm gas}\approx 891$ K, and, degraded to low resolution, shows the same emission is present in the Spitzer/IRS data. A second, quieter link in the argument is geometric: the minimal variable dust cross section derived from 3–5 μm photometry, roughly $(1$–$2.5)\times10^{-3}$ au$^2$, is of the same order as the CO2 emitting area, tying the gas production to the collisional dust production in the sub-au region.

What would settle it

Take a high-resolution ($R \gtrsim 3000$) mid-infrared spectrum of HD 23514 in the 14.5–15.5 μm region: the CO2 Q-branch should resolve into the characteristic rovibrational line pattern, and a Keplerian double-peaked profile would confirm a disk origin. If that structure is absent, the claimed gas bump is a continuum artifact; if the line pattern appears but the flux varies on monthly timescales while the 9 μm feature stays constant, the co-location and replenishment story would need revision.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

HD 23514, an F5V star in the ~150 Myr-old Pleiades cluster, hosts an extreme debris disk whose mid-infrared spectrum is dominated by a 9 μm silica feature. The paper's central discovery is that the same sub-au region also emits hot molecular gas: the JWST MIRI/MRS data show a 10σ CO2 Q-branch at 14.98 μm with P and R branches at 3–5σ, plus CO at 2–4σ and tentative H2O and NH3. An LTE plane-parallel slab fit to the CO2 complex gives an emitting radius of ~0.052 au, a column density of ~1.4×$10^{18}$ $cm^{-2}$, and a gas temperature of ~891 K, and the same model, degraded to Spitzer/IRS resolution, matches a 15 μm bump in the 2008 spectrum at 4.3σ. The dust feature is stable over 40 years of photometry, and SED modeling places the silica-rich grains within roughly 0.1–0.2 au, co-located with the gas. Because unshielded molecules at 0.05 au have photodissociation lifetimes of days to less than a year, the authors conclude that the volatiles are being replenished or shielded, and argue that a giant impact or atmospheric stripping event involving bodies with carbonaceous-chondrite-like volatile content best explains both the silica dust and the gas.

Load-bearing premise

The gas analysis rests on the assumption that the smooth continuum fitted under the 15 μm feature is pure dust; if an optically thick molecular haze also contributes there, the derived line strengths, the 10σ significance, and the 891 K / 0.052 au parameters would all shift, although the Q-branch would remain visible.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A terrestrial-planet-formation zone at 150 Myr can contain hot molecular gas despite photodissociation lifetimes shorter than a year, so gas presence alone is not a sign of a young, primordial disk.
  • The CO2 emission seen in 2008 and 2023 at the same level implies the gas source is stable on 15-year timescales; a single instantaneous impact would need a long-lived reservoir or continuous replenishment to match.
  • If the impactor was carbonaceous-chondrite-like, the volatile species detected (CO2, with tentative H2O and NH3) are exactly what impact outgassing is expected to produce, giving a concrete chemical pathway for delivering volatiles to a newly formed rocky planet.
  • The absence of H2 and [Ne II] emission, together with the system's old age, marks this as secondary gas produced from solids rather than leftover protoplanetary gas.
  • Because the gas-emitting area and the variable dust cross section are comparable in size, monitoring the 3–5 μm dust variability may track the same collisional activity that feeds the molecular gas.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial: If giant impacts routinely outgas CO2, the other known silica-rich extreme debris disks should show the same 15 μm feature in archival or future data; a survey of such systems could turn this single-object discovery into a class property.
  • Editorial: The LTE slab fit is degenerate with non-LTE effects, so the exact temperature and column are not unique; a short-wavelength spectrum covering the brighter CO lines at 4.4–4.9 μm, which the paper identifies as missing, could pin down the true excitation and test the shielding requirement.
  • Editorial: Because the tiny silica grains that dominate the 9 μm feature have blowout lifetimes under a year, the same mechanism that keeps them in the system must keep the gas alive; simultaneous photometry and mid-IR spectroscopy over months would show whether gas and dust variability are correlated.
  • Editorial: A Keplerian interpretation of the broadened CO lines suggests the gas may occupy a rotating disk at ~0.015 au; resolved line profiles in future high-resolution data would measure the inclination and distinguish a disk from an outflow or a spherical cloud.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents JWST/MIRI-MRS 5–28 μm spectroscopy of HD 23514, an F5V member of the Pleiades, and reports the discovery of molecular gas—most prominently CO2 emission centered near 14.98 μm with Q-, P-, and R-branch structure—superposed on the known silica-dominated dust disk. The CO2 Q-branch is detected at 10σ, with P/R branches at 3–5σ, and weaker CO, H2O, and NH3 features are tentatively identified. An LTE slab fit to the CO2 complex gives T_gas ≈ 891 K, N ≈ 1.4×10^18 cm^-2, and an emitting radius of about 0.052 au. Re-analysis of archival Spitzer/IRS data from 2008 shows a 15 μm bump consistent with the same CO2 model at 4.3σ. SED modeling places the feature-producing silica grains in a sub-au region, and photodissociation lifetime calculations imply very short survival times for the volatiles, motivating the authors' suggestion that a giant impact and/or atmospheric stripping event involving carbonaceous-chondrite-like bodies simultaneously produced the small silica grains and the volatile gas.

Significance. If the quantitative gas properties and their co-spatiality with the sub-μm silica dust hold, this is a first and important result: CO2 has not previously been detected in a debris disk, and a 150 Myr-old system with hot volatile gas and highly processed dust directly probes the volatile inventory during the late giant-impact phase. The paper's strengths are the careful data reduction, the artifact checks, the use of archival Spitzer data for a 15-year baseline, and the explicit acknowledgment of model limitations in Appendix C. The visual detection of the CO2 Q-branch is robust to reasonable continuum choices, and the archival Spitzer bump strengthens the case that the feature is astrophysical. The main caveat is that the quantitative claims—temperature, emitting radius, gas mass, and the sub-au colocation—rest on a single LTE slab model and a continuum subtraction that explicitly excludes an optically thick molecular pseudo-continuum, so the numbers quoted in the abstract and conclusions are model-dependent rather than direct measurements.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.3 and Appendix C.1] The quantitative gas properties (T_gas ≈ 891 K, R_em ≈ 0.052 au, N ≈ 1.4×10^18 cm^-2) derive from an LTE slab fit to a continuum-subtracted spectrum, where the continuum is obtained by median/Savitzky-Golay filtering that excludes only 14.78–15.0 μm and explicitly does not model an optically thick molecular pseudo-continuum. A broad molecular opacity component outside the excluded window would bias the line fluxes and therefore the fitted area, column, and temperature, and would also propagate into the 10σ detection significance. The visual Q-branch detection is robust, but the abstract's and Section 4.1's statements that the gas is 'indubitably' hot at ~900 K and confined to 0.03–0.05 au are stronger than the model assumptions support, and should be rephrased or supplemented with a joined continuum+gas fit.
  2. [Table C1 and §3.3] The parameter degeneracy is larger than the quoted MCMC uncertainties: changing v_turb from 0 to 2 km s^-1 changes log10 A from −2.07 to −2.65 (R_em from 0.052 to 0.035 au) with visually equivalent fits, and the authors note that non-LTE can lower the inferred temperature substantially and change the column density by an order of magnitude. The text nevertheless states that 'the properties of CO2 are well constrained' and quotes the nominal values in the abstract and conclusion. The detection is robust, but the temperature, radius, and colocation should be presented as model-dependent estimates with the systematic spread made explicit in the abstract and conclusion rather than only in the appendix.
  3. [§3.4 and Fig. 3] The claimed Spitzer 4.3σ re-detection is not an independent, model-free detection: the IRS bump is measured after forcing the 13.9–15.8 μm continuum to be flat, and the significance is evaluated by adding the JWST-derived CO2 model to that continuum. The paper also reports 2.5σ using combined errors. Therefore the statement that 'the same level of hot CO2 emission is also present in the Spitzer data 15 yr earlier and remains unchanged' overstates the evidence; the archival data are consistent with the JWST model and rule out a large change, but they do not independently determine the line flux. This caveat should be stated in Section 3.4 and in the conclusions.
  4. [§4.1 and Appendix D.1] The sub-au colocation of the silica dust and the CO2 gas is an inference from highly degenerate SED modeling, as the paper itself stresses ('the SED models are extremely degenerate and sensitive to the disk density distribution, and only serve as a zero-order estimate'). The conclusion that both components are 'likely colocated within the sub-au region' is therefore only as strong as the assumed grain composition, minimum grain size, and radial density profile. This should be presented as a model-dependent hypothesis rather than a measured spatial coincidence, especially because the system is unresolved in all current observations.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title and throughout] There are several typographical issues: 'V olatile' in the title, 'F ASTR1' for FASTRI, 'T able C1' for Table C1, and inconsistent hyphenation of 'co-spatial/cospatial'.
  2. [Appendix A.2] The text uses both 'Q10' and 'O10' for the olivine index; the symbol should be O10 consistently.
  3. [Appendix C.1] The database is referred to as 'HI-TRAN'; the standard acronym is HITRAN.
  4. [Appendix C.3] The phrase 'under estimates' should be one word ('underestimates').
  5. [§3.3] The word 'indubitably' is too strong given the acknowledged model limitations; a more measured phrase such as 'strongly indicates' would better match the evidence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the CO2 detection and gas-property inference are self-contained, and the Spitzer re-detection is an independent forward-model consistency check.

full rationale

The central claim—detection of CO2 gas emission in the JWST MIRI/MRS spectrum—is obtained directly from the calibrated spectrum after continuum subtraction, with line identifications based on the HITRAN database and LTE slab modeling via the external iris and dynesty packages. Nothing in the continuum construction or line fit is defined in terms of the claimed detection significance or the inferred temperature and radius. The 891 K and 0.052 au values are free parameters of a three-parameter LTE fit (A, N, Tgas), not inputs. The Spitzer/IRS check is not a fit to the Spitzer data using Spitzer-derived parameters; it takes the JWST-fitted CO2 model as a fixed template, adds it to a polynomial continuum, and measures the residual Q-branch excess at 4.3 sigma—an independent, though model-dependent, confirmation. Photodissociation lifetimes use the Kurucz stellar model and published Leiden cross sections, and the paper explicitly labels its non-LTE and pseudo-continuum assumptions as limitations. The giant-impact interpretation is offered after the detection, not as an input to it. No fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central detection of CO2 does not require the fitted gas parameters or SED model parameters to be correct; the line is visible in the spectrum. However, the derived properties such as emitting radius, column density, and colocation with silica dust depend on the fitted LTE slab parameters and the SED model parameters listed above. The main axioms are the LTE assumption and the continuum construction, both acknowledged as limitations by the authors.

free parameters (6)
  • CO2 LTE slab emitting area (log10 A) = -2.07 +/- 0.02 au2 (v_turb=0)
    Fitted to the 13.5-16.3 micron CO2 complex in JWST MIRI/MRS data (Table C1).
  • CO2 LTE slab column density (log10 N) = 18.14 +/- 0.06 cm-2
    Fitted simultaneously with area and temperature.
  • CO2 LTE slab gas temperature (log10 Tgas) = 2.95 +/- 0.02 (K)
    Fitted; posterior shown in Figure C5.
  • Pseudocontinuum blackbody temperatures = 750 K and 200 K
    Chosen to anchor the featureless dust continuum in Appendix A.2; affects line fluxes after subtraction.
  • CO model parameters = low T: log N=20.5, log A=-2.0; high T: log N=17.5, log A=-2.5, T=3000 K
    Adjusted visually to match CO lines (Appendix C.1).
  • SED model minimum grain size = 0.1-0.5 micron
    Required to reproduce 10/20 micron feature strengths (Appendix D.1); supports colocation claim.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The CO2 emitting gas is in local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) and can be described by a single plane-parallel isothermal slab.
    Adopted in Appendix C.1; the authors note non-LTE could change the column density by an order of magnitude (Bosman et al. 2017).
  • domain assumption The dust continuum can be represented by a combination of two blackbodies at 750 K and 200 K, and any optically thick molecular pseudo-continuum is absent.
    Used to construct the pseudocontinuum in Appendix A.2 and C.1; if false, line fluxes and detection significance could change.
  • domain assumption The stellar photosphere is well described by a Kurucz model with T=6500 K, log g=4.5, Av=0.1.
    Used to subtract the stellar contribution and compute photodissociation rates (Appendix A.1); the authors note the model likely underestimates UV emission.
  • domain assumption Photodissociation cross sections from the Leiden database and a standard ISRF are applicable.
    Used for lifetime estimates in Section 4.3 and Figure 5.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Discovery of Volatile Gas in the Giant Impact Disk around the 150-Myr old HD 23514." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3WW6QHBC

@misc{pith2026250620919,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Discovery of Volatile Gas in the Giant Impact Disk around the 150-Myr old HD 23514},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3WW6QHBC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.20919}
}
abstract

We report the discovery of CO$_2$ gas emission around HD 23514, an F5V star in the $\sim$150 Myr-old Pleiades cluster, hosting one of the rare giant-impact disks with unique mineralogy dominated by silica dust. We show that the dust feature remains stable over several decades, and that the sub-$\mu$m grains, which give rise to the $\sim$9 $\mu$m feature, are co-spatial with the hot CO$_2$ molecules within the sub-au vicinity of the star. Examining the Spitzer spectrum taken 15 years earlier, we show that the CO$_2$ emission was also present at 4.3 $\sigma$ significance. The existence of tiny silica grains and volatile gas requires special conditions to prevent the rapid loss caused by stellar radiation pressure and photodissociation. We explore several pathways explaining the observed properties and suggest that a past giant impact and/or stripping atmospheric event, involving large bodies with volatile content similar to the carbonaceous chondritic material, can simultaneously explain both the silica and volatile emission. Our discovery provides an important context for the amount of volatiles that a newly formed planet or the largest planetesimals could retain during the giant impact phase in the early solar system evolution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.20919 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The left panel shows the comparison between the JWST MIRI/MRS and Spitzer/IRS disk spectrum around HD 23514 taken 15 yr apart with the bottom one showing the flux ratio between the two. The color shaded area indicates the associated ±1σ uncertainty. The two spectra agree within ±1σ in the silica 9 µm region while in the 20 µm region JWST data appear to be slightly lower by ∼3σ. The thin green line is the estimated d… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Zoom-in, continuum-subtracted spectrum centered at ∼15 µm showing the dominant CO2 Q-, P-, and R-branch molecular lines in the upper panel and the residuals (data − model) in the bottom panel. The black line depicts the data, with the gray horizontal area showing the ±1σ estimated in the local spectral region. Filled, color areas show the model emission from four volatile species: CO2, H2O, NH3 and 13CO2 with the da… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spitzer IRS low-resolution spectrum of HD 23514 observed in 2008 centered at the CO2 15 µm complex, where the data are shown as the black line with 1σ rms error show￾ing as dark vertical lines (gray for the combined error). The thick red line is the expected, low-resolution model spectrum if the same level of the CO2 emission detected by JWST (thin red line) was also present. This comparison suggests that the same C… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The SED of the HD 23514 system where the data points come from 2MASS, Spitzer and Herschel photometry along with the mid-IR spectra. Lines show the SED models for a disk in a radial range of 0.1–3 au and a dust composition mixture of silica and pyroxene, and grains lac…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The photodissociation lifetime of unshielded molecules as exposed to both the ultraviolet (UV) photons from HD 23514 and the interstellar radiation field (ISRF) as a function of stellocentric distance where the dashed lines are those only using ISRF. The UV emission fr…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    1985, Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Proceedings, 90, C545

    Abe, Y., & Matsui, T. 1985, Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Proceedings, 90, C545

    1985

  2. [2]

    A., Weinberger, A

    Arnold, J. A., Weinberger, A. J., Videen, G., & Zubko, E. S. 2019, AJ, 157, 157, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab095e

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab095e 2019

  3. [3]

    1988, ApJL, 335, L79, doi: 10.1086/185344 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A

    Artymowicz, P. 1988, ApJL, 335, L79, doi: 10.1086/185344 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    doi:10.1086/185344 1988

  4. [4]

    R., Murphy, S

    Bedding, T. R., Murphy, S. J., Crawford, C., et al. 2023, ApJL, 946, L10, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acc17a

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acc17a 2023

  5. [5]

    M., Plazy, F., & Mouillet, D

    Beust, H., Lagrange, A. M., Plazy, F., & Mouillet, D. 1996, A&A, 310, 181

    1996

  6. [6]

    P., & Brauer, F

    Birnstiel, T., Dullemond, C. P., & Brauer, F. 2010, A&A, 513, A79, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913731

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913731 2010

  7. [7]

    C., Marino, S., et al

    Bonsor, A., Wyatt, M. C., Marino, S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 3115, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2912

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2912 2023

  8. [8]

    D., Bruderer, S., & van Dishoeck, E

    Bosman, A. D., Bruderer, S., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2017, A&A, 601, A36, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629946

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629946 2017

Show all 92 references
  1. [9]

    A., Lamy, P

    Burns, J. A., Lamy, P. L., & Soter, S. 1979, Icarus, 40, 1, doi: 10.1016/0019-1035(79)90050-2

    1979 doi

  2. [10]

    2024, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.15.1, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12692459

    Bushouse, H., Eisenhamer, J., Dencheva, N., et al. 2024, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.15.1, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12692459

    2024 doi

  3. [11]

    Canup, R. M. 2004, Icarus, 168, 433, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2003.09.028

    2004 doi

  4. [12]

    M., Wright, E

    Cutri, R. M., Wright, E. L., Conrow, T., et al. 2012, Explanatory Supplement to the WISE All-Sky Data Release Products, Explanatory Supplement to the WISE All-Sky Data Release Products de Wit, W. J., Grinin, V. P., Potravnov, I. S., et al. 2013, A&A, 553, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004...

    2012 doi

  5. [13]

    Dent, W. R. F., Wyatt, M. C., Roberge, A., et al. 2014, Science, 343, 1490, doi: 10.1126/science.1248726

    2014 doi

  6. [14]

    2021, OpTool: Command-line driven tool for creating complex dust opacities, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2104.010

    Dominik, C., Min, M., & Tazaki, R. 2021, OpTool: Command-line driven tool for creating complex dust opacities, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2104.010. http://ascl.net/2104.010

    2021

  7. [15]

    1995, A&A, 300, 503

    Mutschke, H. 1995, A&A, 300, 503

    1995

  8. [16]

    Draine, B. T. 1978, ApJS, 36, 595, doi: 10.1086/190513

    1978 doi

  9. [17]

    2018, MNRAS, 476, 908, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty212

    Fang, X.-S., Zhao, G., Zhao, J.-K., & Bharat Kumar, Y. 2018, MNRAS, 476, 908, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty212

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    2022, A&A, 668, A4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243590

    Fu, X., Bragaglia, A., Liu, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 668, A4, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243590

    2022 doi

  11. [19]

    2012, ApJL, 749, L29, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/749/2/L29 Discovery of Volatiles in the HD 23514 Giant Impact Disk21

    Fujiwara, H., Onaka, T., Yamashita, T., et al. 2012, ApJL, 749, L29, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/749/2/L29 Discovery of Volatiles in the HD 23514 Giant Impact Disk21

    2012 doi

  12. [20]

    2007, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 258, 543, doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2007.04.014 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A

    Furukawa, Y., Nakazawa, H., Sekine, T., & Kakegawa, T. 2007, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 258, 543, doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2007.04.014 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039657

    2007 doi

  13. [21]

    2019, MNRAS, 488, 4465, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1942

    Gaidos, E., Jacobs, T., LaCourse, D., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 4465, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1942

    2019 doi

  14. [22]

    E., Rothman, L

    Gordon, I. E., Rothman, L. S., Hargreaves, R. J., et al. 2022, JQSRT, 277, 107949, doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107949

    2022

  15. [23]

    Woodward, C. E. 2023, PSJ, 4, 242, doi: 10.3847/PSJ/ad0382

    2023 doi

  16. [24]

    N., Bosman, A

    Heays, A. N., Bosman, A. D., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2017, A&A, 602, A105, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628742

    2017 doi

  17. [25]

    2010, Astromineralogy, Vol

    Henning, T. 2010, Astromineralogy, Vol. 815, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-13259-9

    2010 doi

  18. [26]

    1997, A&A, 327, 743

    Henning, T., & Mutschke, H. 1997, A&A, 327, 743

    1997

  19. [27]

    J., Davenport, J

    Ilin, E., Schmidt, S. J., Davenport, J. R. A., & Strassmeier, K. G. 2019, A&A, 622, A133, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834400

    2019 doi

  20. [28]

    2010, A&A, 514, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913811

    Ishihara, D., Onaka, T., Kataza, H., et al. 2010, A&A, 514, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913811

    2010 doi

  21. [29]

    P., & Wyatt, M

    Jackson, A. P., & Wyatt, M. C. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 657, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21546.x

    2012

  22. [30]

    C., & Melosh, H

    Johnson, B. C., & Melosh, H. J. 2012, Icarus, 217, 416, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.11.020

    2012 doi

  23. [31]

    C., Lisse, C

    Johnson, B. C., Lisse, C. M., Chen, C. H., et al. 2012, ApJ, 761, 45, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/761/1/45 Juh´ asz, A., Bouwman, J., Henning, T., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 431, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/721/1/431

    2012 doi

  24. [32]

    M., & Wyatt, M

    Kennedy, G. M., & Wyatt, M. C. 2013, MNRAS, 433, 2334, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt900

    2013 doi

  25. [33]

    J., Najita, J

    Kenyon, S. J., Najita, J. R., & Bromley, B. C. 2016, ApJ, 831, 8, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/8

    2016 doi

  26. [34]

    2007, ApOpt, 46, 8118, doi: 10.1364/AO.46.008118

    Kitamura, R., Pilon, L., & Jonasz, M. 2007, ApOpt, 46, 8118, doi: 10.1364/AO.46.008118

    2007 doi

  27. [35]

    2013, ApJ, 778, 60, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/60

    Koike, C., Noguchi, R., Chihara, H., et al. 2013, ApJ, 778, 60, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/778/1/60

    2013 doi

  28. [36]

    A., & Ahrens, T

    Lange, M. A., & Ahrens, T. J. 1982, Icarus, 51, 96, doi: 10.1016/0019-1035(82)90031-8

    1982 doi

  29. [37]

    R., Argyriou, I., Gordon, K

    Law, D. R., Argyriou, I., Gordon, K. D., et al. 2025, AJ, 169, 67, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad9685

    2025 doi

  30. [38]

    J., Spoon, H

    Lebouteiller, V., Barry, D. J., Spoon, H. W. W., et al. 2011, ApJS, 196, 8, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/196/1/8

    2011 doi

  31. [39]

    C., et al

    Lebreton, J., van Lieshout, R., Augereau, J. C., et al. 2013, A&A, 555, A146, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321415

    2013 doi

  32. [40]

    M., Chen, C

    Lisse, C. M., Chen, C. H., Wyatt, M. C., et al. 2009, ApJ, 701, 2019, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/2019

    2009 doi

  33. [41]

    M., Meng, H

    Lisse, C. M., Meng, H. Y. A., Sitko, M. L., et al. 2020, ApJ, 894, 116, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7b80

    2020 doi

  34. [42]

    2019, A&A, 623, A106, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834418

    Liu, Y., Pascucci, I., & Henning, T. 2019, A&A, 623, A106, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834418

    2019 doi

  35. [43]

    L., & Silvotti, R

    Lodieu, N., P´ erez-Garrido, A., Smart, R. L., & Silvotti, R. 2019, A&A, 628, A66, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935533

    2019 doi

  36. [44]

    C., Pani´ c, O., et al

    Marino, S., Wyatt, M. C., Pani´ c, O., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 2595, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2867 Matr` a, L., Wyatt, M. C., Wilner, D. J., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab06c0 Matr` a, L., Marino, S., Wilner, D. J., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A151, doi: 10.1051...

    2017 doi

  37. [45]

    2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2104.06448

    Melis, C., Olofsson, J., Song, I., et al. 2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2104.06448. https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.06448

    2021 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Meng, H. Y. A., Rieke, G. H., Su, K. Y. L., et al. 2012, ApJL, 751, L17, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/751/1/L17

    2012 doi

  39. [47]

    Meng, H. Y. A., Su, K. Y. L., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2014, Science, 345, 1032, doi: 10.1126/science.1255153

    2014 doi

  40. [48]

    C., Mayor, M., & Udry, S

    Mermilliod, J. C., Mayor, M., & Udry, S. 2009, A&A, 498, 949, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200810244

    2009 doi

  41. [49]

    2005, ApJ, 634, 1126, doi: 10.1086/497123

    Wyckoff, S. 2005, ApJ, 634, 1126, doi: 10.1086/497123

    2005 doi

  42. [50]

    W., & de Koter, A

    Min, M., Hovenier, J. W., & de Koter, A. 2005, A&A, 432, 909, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041920 Mo´ or, A., Cur´ e, M., K´ osp´ al,´A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 849, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8e4e Mo´ or, A.,´Abrah´ am, P., Szab´ o, G., et al. 2021, ApJ, 910, 27, doi: 10.3847/1538-...

    2005 doi

  43. [51]

    2016, Icarus, 278, 162, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2016.06.013

    Morlok, A., Stojic, A., Weber, I., et al. 2016, Icarus, 278, 162, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2016.06.013

    2016 doi

  44. [52]

    Moshir, M., Kopman, G., & Conrow, T. A. O. 1992, IRAS Faint Source Survey, Explanatory supplement version 2

    1992

  45. [53]

    E., Banzatti, A., & ¨Oberg, K

    Munoz-Romero, C. E., Banzatti, A., & ¨Oberg, K. I. 2023, iris (InfraRed Isothermal Slabs), Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10369000

    2023 doi

  46. [54]

    2016, ARA&A, 54, 441, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315

    Naoz, S. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 441, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023315

    2016 doi

  47. [55]

    2007, ApJ, 663, 383, doi: 10.1086/518535

    Pascucci, I., Hollenbach, D., Najita, J., et al. 2007, ApJ, 663, 383, doi: 10.1086/518535

    2007 doi

  48. [56]

    D., Krivov, A

    Pearce, T. D., Krivov, A. V., & Booth, M. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 2798, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2514

    2020 doi

  49. [57]

    M., Salyk, C., Banzatti, A., et al

    Pontoppidan, K. M., Salyk, C., Banzatti, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 158, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad20f0

    2024 doi

  50. [58]

    V., Barclay, T., Borucki, W

    Quintana, E. V., Barclay, T., Borucki, W. J., Rowe, J. F., & Chambers, J. E. 2016, ApJ, 821, 126, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/126

    2016 doi

  51. [59]

    H., Song, I., & Zuckerman, B

    Rhee, J. H., Song, I., & Zuckerman, B. 2008, ApJ, 675, 777, doi: 10.1086/524935 22Su et al

    2008 doi

  52. [60]

    H., G´ asp´ ar, A., & Ballering, N

    Rieke, G. H., G´ asp´ ar, A., & Ballering, N. P. 2016, ApJ, 816, 50, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/816/2/50

    2016 doi

  53. [61]

    H., Su, K

    Rieke, G. H., Su, K. Y. L., Melis, C., & G´ asp´ ar, A. 2021, ApJ, 918, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0dc4

    2021 doi

  54. [62]

    2017, MNRAS, 469, S598, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1873

    Rinaldi, G., Della Corte, V., Fulle, M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, S598, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1873

    2017 doi

  55. [63]

    D., Lagrange, A

    Roberge, A., Feldman, P. D., Lagrange, A. M., et al. 2000, ApJ, 538, 904, doi: 10.1086/309157

    2000 doi

  56. [64]

    R., Marois, C., Zuckerman, B., Macintosh, B., & Melis, C

    Rodriguez, D. R., Marois, C., Zuckerman, B., Macintosh, B., & Melis, C. 2012, ApJ, 748, 30, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/748/1/30 Rom´ an-Z´ u˜ niga, C. G., Kounkel, M., Hern´ andez, J., et al. 2023, AJ, 165, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aca3a4

    2012 doi

  57. [65]

    Samland, M., Henning, T., Garatti, A. C. o., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.09976, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.09976

    2025 doi arXiv

  58. [66]

    J., D’Alessio, P., et al

    Sargent, B., Forrest, W. J., D’Alessio, P., et al. 2006, ApJ, 645, 395, doi: 10.1086/504283

    2006 doi

  59. [67]

    A., Forrest, W

    Sargent, B. A., Forrest, W. J., Tayrien, C., et al. 2009, ApJ, 690, 1193, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1193

    2009 doi

  60. [68]

    2010, Icarus, 208, 438, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.01.026

    Schaefer, L., & Fegley, B. 2010, Icarus, 208, 438, doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.01.026

    2010 doi

  61. [69]

    P., et al

    Schneiderman, T., Matr` a, L., Jackson, A. P., et al. 2021, Nature, 598, 425, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03872-x

    2021 doi

  62. [70]

    M., Rieke, G

    Sierchio, J. M., Rieke, G. H., Su, K. Y. L., & G´ asp´ ar, A. 2014, ApJ, 785, 33, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/785/1/33

    2014 doi

  63. [71]

    Speagle, J. S. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 3132, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa278

    2020 doi

  64. [72]

    Su, K. Y. L., Kennedy, G. M., Schlawin, E., Jackson, A. P., & Rieke, G. H. 2022, ApJ, 927, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4bbb

    2022 doi

  65. [73]

    Su, K. Y. L., Rieke, G. H., Melis, C., et al. 2020, ApJ, 898, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9c9b

    2020 doi

  66. [74]

    Su, K. Y. L., Rieke, G. H., Misselt, K. A., et al. 2005, ApJ, 628, 487, doi: 10.1086/430819

    2005 doi

  67. [75]

    Su, K. Y. L., Jackson, A. P., G´ asp´ ar, A., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 202, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab1260

    2019 doi

  68. [76]

    Su, K. Y. L., Kennedy, G. M., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2023, ApJ, 959, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad04d9

    2023 doi

  69. [77]

    J., Matr` a, L., et al

    Sullivan, D., Wilner, D. J., Matr` a, L., et al. 2022, AJ, 164, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac80c5

    2022 doi

  70. [78]

    Takarada, T., Sato, B., Omiya, M., Hori, Y., & Fujii, M. S. 2020, PASJ, 72, 104, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psaa105

    2020 doi

  71. [79]

    2001, ApJ, 557, 990, doi: 10.1086/322252

    Takeuchi, T., & Artymowicz, P. 2001, ApJ, 557, 990, doi: 10.1086/322252

    2001 doi

  72. [80]

    2019, A&A, 626, A24, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935341

    Thebault, P., & Kral, Q. 2019, A&A, 626, A24, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935341

    2019 doi

  73. [81]

    A., Telus, M., Schaefer, L., et al

    Thompson, M. A., Telus, M., Schaefer, L., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 575, doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01338-8

    2021 doi

  74. [82]

    2022, A&A, 659, A95, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141702 van Dishoeck, E

    Tsantaki, M., Pancino, E., Marrese, P., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A95, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141702 van Dishoeck, E. F., & Black, J. H. 1982, ApJ, 258, 533, doi: 10.1086/160104

    2022 doi

  75. [83]

    2016, ApJ, 833, 263, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/263

    Vican, L., Schneider, A., Bryden, G., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 263, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/263

    2016 doi

  76. [84]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  77. [85]

    F., & Black, J

    Visser, R., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Black, J. H. 2009, A&A, 503, 323, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912129

    2009 doi

  78. [86]

    M., Leisenring, J

    Watson, D. M., Leisenring, J. M., Furlan, E., et al. 2009, ApJS, 180, 84, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/180/1/84

    2009 doi

  79. [87]

    M., & Carter, P

    Watt, L., Leinhardt, Z. M., & Carter, P. J. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 7749, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3606

    2024 doi

  80. [88]

    L., Eisenhardt, P

    Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868

    2010 doi

  81. [89]

    C., Smith, R., Greaves, J

    Wyatt, M. C., Smith, R., Greaves, J. S., et al. 2007, ApJ, 658, 569, doi: 10.1086/510999

    2007 doi

  82. [90]

    D., & Wyatt, M

    Young, S. D., & Wyatt, M. C. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 5244, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2963

    2024 doi

  83. [91]

    G., Mennella, V., Colangeli, L., & Bussoletti, E

    Zubko, V. G., Mennella, V., Colangeli, L., & Bussoletti, E. 1996, MNRAS, 282, 1321

    1996

  84. [92]

    2015, ApJ, 798, 86, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/798/2/86

    Zuckerman, B. 2015, ApJ, 798, 86, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/798/2/86

    2015 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.