Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 34 references

Scaling of the Electrical Conductivity Spectra Reveals Distinct Transport Responses in A2SmTaO6 [A = Ba, Sr, Ca]

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For A2SmTaO6 double perovskites, the paper shows that conductivity spectra collapse onto a single master curve for Ba and Sr but not for Ca, and interprets the failure as evidence of dipolar frustration and glassy charge dynamics in the gra

desk verdict The paper adds new impedance data on three A2SmTaO6 perovskites, but the headline scaling collapse is an algebraic consequence of the fitting equation; the CST deviation is real but overinterpreted as 'dipolar frustration.' read the letter →

arxiv 2508.21621 v1 pith:3XFKJGKW submitted 2025-08-29 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Saswata Halder , Binita Ghosh , T. P. Sinha This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords ScalingElectricalconductivityImpedancespectroscopyFrustrationDisorderDoubleperovskiteTime-temperaturesuperposition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that the way ac conductivity spectra scale with temperature and frequency can reveal how disorder shapes charge transport in polycrystalline double perovskites. Using three A2SmTaO6 compounds (A = Ba, Sr, Ca), the authors find that Ba2SmTaO6 and Sr2SmTaO6 conductivity spectra collapse onto one master curve when normalized by dc conductivity and scaled by hopping frequency, while Ca2SmTaO6 does not collapse at high frequencies in the grain-boundary regime. That deviation is read as evidence that local inhomogeneities in the energy landscape create a broad distribution of relaxation times, an electrical analogue of spin-glass 'dipolar frustration.' The claimed payoff is that the extent of scaling collapse serves as a sensitive probe of microscopic disorder: the more complete the master curve, the more homogeneous the charge-transport pathways. If correct, the result gives materials scientists a direct spectroscopic test for transport disorder in functional oxides.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the scaled conductivity spectrum: sigma_ac/sigma_dc = F(omega/omega_s), with the frequency axis rescaled by omega_s = sigma_dc T or omega_s = omega_H. F is the temperature-independent master function; when all temperatures fall on one F, the time–temperature superposition principle holds. The argument also rests on the Jonscher power-law form sigma_ac = sigma_dc[1+(omega/omega_H)^n], which defines the hopping frequency omega_H marking the transition from long-range translation to dispersive hopping, and on the analogous scaling of the imaginary impedance Z''/Z''_max versus omega/omega_max. The machinery works by comparing the degree of collapse: complete collapse i

What would settle it

Fit Eq. (2) separately at each temperature and plot n versus T for BST, SST, and CST. If n changes systematically with temperature, then the reported sigma_ac/sigma_dc master curves are a trivial consequence of the fitting form rather than evidence of time–temperature superposition; if n is constant and CST's high-frequency branch still fails to merge with the other two compounds, the disorder/dipolar-frustration interpretation is supported. A second check: extract omega_H independently from the impedance modulus peaks and redo the scaling, rather than using omega_H from the same conductivity

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the time–temperature superposition principle holds predominantly in the grain-boundary regime of these oxides, and that even there the quality of the collapse tracks microscopic energetic inhomogeneity. Concretely, the paper reports that for Ba2SmTaO6 and Sr2SmTaO6 the normalized ac conductivity sigma_ac/sigma_dc plotted against omega/omega_s (with omega_s = sigma_dc T or omega_s = omega_H) collapses onto a single temperature-independent master curve; for Ca2SmTaO6 the scaled spectra fail to merge in the high-frequency region beyond omega_H, where grain-boundary relaxation and long-range grain conduction both contribute. The authors also find a nearly linear (slope

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the collapse of the normalized spectra is a genuine test of universality and not an automatic consequence of the fitting form: this requires the power-law exponent n to be temperature-independent, a quantity the paper never reports.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the scaling interpretation is right, ac conductivity measurements alone can rank the degree of transport disorder in polycrystalline oxides: the more complete the master-curve collapse, the more homogeneous the energy landscape.
  • The sigma_dc–omega_H correlation with near-unity slope implies that in these materials the onset of ac dispersion coincides with the relaxation frequency, so a single timescale governs both conduction and relaxation.
  • For Ca2SmTaO6, the failure to collapse above omega_H localizes the disorder to the grain-boundary regime and to the crossover where grain-boundary relaxation and grain conduction mix.
  • Activation energies in the 0.12–0.24 eV range support small-polaron hopping as the dominant transport mechanism, linking structural distortion (Sr, Ca monoclinic tilting) to slower dynamics.
  • The method carries over directly to other 1:1 ordered double perovskites: a composition-dependent scaling function (as previously used for Ba2HoRu1−xSbxO6) can extend the single-material master curves to solid-solution series.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A decisive check the paper leaves implicit: report the power-law exponent n(T). Because Eq. (2) makes sigma_ac/sigma_dc = 1+(omega/omega_H)^n, a temperature-independent n by construction gives a master curve; the interpretation would be much stronger if n is shown to be truly constant while CST still fails to scale.
  • If dipolar frustration is real, the same samples should show corresponding anomalies in dielectric loss scaling and in the frequency dependence of the electric modulus — measurements that are already in the paper's impedance data and could be analyzed with the same master-curve logic.
  • The spin-glass analogy suggests a testable prediction: quenched disorder should produce a frequency-dependent freezing-like feature in the AC susceptibility analogue (e.g., a peak in the imaginary modulus that shifts with frequency), comparable to T_f cusps in spin glasses.
  • The scaling protocol could be applied to single crystals or epitaxial films of the same compositions; if the collapse improves when grain boundaries are removed, that would confirm the grain-boundary landscape as the source of the non-universality.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports ac conductivity and impedance measurements on polycrystalline double perovskites A2SmTaO6 (A = Ba, Sr, Ca) between 303 and 673 K. The authors fit the conductivity spectra to the Jonscher power-law form σ_ac = σ_dc[1 + (ω/ω_H)^n] (Eq. (2)), extract σ_dc and ω_H at each temperature, and show that σ_dc and ω_H are linearly correlated. They then normalize the spectra by σ_dc and scale the frequency axis by either σ_dcT or ω_H, reporting that BST and SST collapse onto a single master curve while CST does not in the high-frequency grain-boundary region. This difference is interpreted as evidence of time–temperature superposition holding mainly in the grain-boundary regime, with deviations attributed to local energetic inhomogeneities and, ultimately, to 'dipolar frustration' and glassy charge dynamics.

Significance. If the scaling analysis were genuinely independent of the assumed fitting form, the comparison across Ba, Sr, and Ca substitution would be a useful contribution to understanding how A-site size and octahedral tilting affect charge transport in double perovskites. The experimental dataset and the attempt to link microstructural disorder to scaling behavior are valuable. The manuscript also correctly draws attention to the need to separate grain and grain-boundary contributions. However, as detailed below, the central empirical signature of TTSP is, by the paper's own Eq. (2), an algebraic consequence of the fitting model when the exponent n is temperature-independent. The paper never reports n(T), fit residuals, or goodness-of-fit statistics, and the correlation between σ_dc and ω_H is between two parameters of the same fit. These gaps undermine the central claim in its current form, although they are potentially addressable in a revision.

major comments (4)
  1. [§III, Eq. (2) and Figs. 4(c–d), 5(c–d)] The scaling collapse using ω_H is mathematically implied by Eq. (2). Dividing by σ_dc and scaling frequency by ω_H gives σ_ac/σ_dc = 1 + (ω/ω_H)^n, which is automatically a temperature-independent master curve whenever the fit is good and n is constant. The paper never reports n(T), fit residuals, or confidence intervals, so the BST/SST 'collapse' cannot be distinguished from a restatement of the assumed Jonscher form. Please provide n(T), residuals, and a demonstration that the collapse is nontrivial, e.g., by comparing freely fitted n versus fixed-n fits or by showing that the data cannot be collapsed under an alternative scaling hypothesis.
  2. [§III, Figs. 4(b), 5(b), 6(b)] The σ_dc versus ω_H correlation is between two parameters extracted from the same fit of Eq. (2). The text states that a slope of almost unity 'proves our hypothesis that the relaxation and conduction mechanisms are strongly correlated,' but this is not an independent test. In addition, the text writes σ_dc ∼ ω_H^n where 'n' is the slope, which conflates the power-law exponent of Eq. (2) with the slope of the log-log correlation. Please clarify the distinction and provide independent estimates of ω_H (e.g., from modulus peak frequencies) with uncertainty bounds.
  3. [§III, Figs. 6(c–d) and following paragraph] For CST the manuscript explicitly states that the high-frequency region above ω_H contains contributions from both grain-boundary relaxation and long-range grain transport. A single-power-law normalization cannot collapse a two-process spectrum, so the non-collapse of CST is expected even without invoking 'dipolar frustration.' To support the proposed interpretation, the two contributions must be modeled explicitly or the scaling restricted to the frequency window where only one process dominates. Without this, the causal link between non-collapse and microscopic energetic inhomogeneity is unsupported.
  4. [§III, Fig. 7 and text] The activation energies are inconsistently reported: the text states 0.12 eV, 0.19 eV, and 0.24 eV for BST, SST, and CST, respectively, but the Fig. 7 captions give 1.2 eV for BST and 0.28 eV for CST. The text also mentions 'non-linear behavior in the Arrhenius plots,' but Fig. 7 shows linear fits. These discrepancies must be reconciled, as the activation energies are used to argue for different energy landscapes and polaronic hopping.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract lists A = Ba, Ca, but the paper studies A = Ba, Sr, Ca. Sr is missing. Please correct.
  2. [Throughout] The notation is inconsistent: σ_ac/σ_dc is written as 'sac/sdc', ω_H as 'wH', and the y-axis labels in Figs. 4–6 use 'log sac' without subscripts. Please unify mathematical notation in text and figures.
  3. [Figs. 3(b–d)] The legend shows only 513 K and 553 K, but the text implies a broader temperature range. Please indicate all temperatures or state that only two are shown for clarity.
  4. [Fig. 7] The Arrhenius plots have axis labels that could be clearer, and the caption text for BST uses '1.2 eV' while the text uses '0.12 eV.' Check and correct.
  5. [General] There are typographical errors such as 'Arhennius' and inconsistent use of 'poycrystalline' vs 'polycrystalline.' A careful proofread is needed.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Conductivity-spectrum collapse is built into Eq. (2): normalizing by σdc and ωH turns the assumed Jonscher form into the master curve itself, so the TTSP claim is partly a restatement of the fitting model.

  1. self definitional [Section III (Results and Discussion), Eq. (2) and Figs. 4(c-d), 5(c-d)]
    "σac = σdc[1 + (ω/ωH)^n] (2) ... The conductivity axis for BST, SST and CST has been normalized by the dc conductivity (σdc). For BST, as shown in Figures 4(c)–(d), both scaling formalisms result in a complete collapse of the spectra to a single master curve, indicating a consistent scaling behavior."

    Dividing Eq. (2) by σdc gives σac/σdc = 1 + (ω/ωH)^n. The scaling plots use exactly these normalized coordinates (y = σac/σdc, x = ω/ωH). Therefore, when the data are well described by Eq. (2) and the fitted exponent n is approximately temperature independent, the 'master curve' is the assumed Jonscher function itself; the collapse is an algebraic identity, not an independent test of time-temperature superposition. The paper does not report n(T) or fit residuals, so the reader cannot see whether the collapse was achieved by construction rather than by a physical shape invariance. The same fitted σdc and ωH are then correlated (Figs. 4b-6b), so that correlation is also not an independent check.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section III, Figs. 4(b), 5(b), 6(b) and surrounding text]
    "The figures show a near linear nature with a slope of almost unity indicating a power law dependency of the form σdc ∼ ωH^n, where ‘n’ is the slope that proves our hypothesis that the relaxation and conduction mechanisms are strongly correlated in AST."

    σdc and ωH are the two parameters of the same Eq. (2) fit to each conductivity spectrum (the plateau level and the crossover frequency). Their mutual correlation is therefore partly an artifact of the fitting model, not a measurement of an independent physical relation. Presenting this correlation as 'proving our hypothesis' elevates a fitted-parameter relationship to an experimental finding. The claim that TTSP holds is then supported by an internal correlation of the same fit rather than by independent observables.

full rationale

The raw experimental content—XRD, impedance spectra, Arrhenius activation energies, and the BST/SST/CST comparison—is not circular; those are independent measurements and are self-contained. However, the central TTSP evidence is partially circular. The paper assumes the Jonscher power-law form in Eq. (2), then plots σac/σdc versus ω/ωH. For any single-process spectrum described by Eq. (2), that normalized plot is 1+(ω/ωH)^n and collapses across temperatures whenever n is constant, with or without any underlying time-temperature superposition. Since n(T) and fit residuals are never reported, the 'master curve' for BST/SST is indistinguishable from the algebraic consequence of the assumed fitting function. The claimed σdc–ωH correlation (slope ~1) is likewise between two quantities extracted from the same fit. For CST, the paper itself says the high-frequency window contains both grain-boundary relaxation and grain transport, so the failure of a single-power-law scaling is a predicted model violation, not an independent observation of 'dipolar frustration.' These issues affect the load-bearing interpretive claim (TTSP and glassiness) while leaving the raw data and fitted parameters intact. Some self-citations (Refs. [23], [27]) are used as background, but the argument does not stand or fall on them. Overall: partial circularity in the central scaling signature.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central interpretive claims rest on fitted parameters from Eq. (2) and on a speculative spin-glass analogy. The paper contributes new data but the interpretation adds concepts not independently evidenced.

free parameters (4)
  • sigma_dc (dc conductivity) = temperature-dependent values per sample, not tabulated
    Fitted to the low-frequency plateau of Eq. (2) for each spectrum.
  • omega_H (hopping frequency) = temperature-dependent values per sample, not tabulated
    Fitted crossover frequency in Eq. (2).
  • n (power-law exponent) = values not reported
    Power-law exponent in Eq. (2); temperature dependence is never shown, despite being essential to whether scaling collapse is trivial.
  • Ea (activation energy) = 0.12 eV (BST), 0.19 eV (SST), 0.24 eV (CST) in text; Fig. 7(a) shows 1.2 eV for BST
    Slopes of log sigma_dc vs 1000/T in Fig. 7.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The ac conductivity follows Jonscher's universal power law, Eq. (2), over the measured window.
    An empirical law assumed to apply to these materials; no derivation or independent check is provided.
  • domain assumption The measured response is dominated by grain-boundary conduction, with grains contributing only at high frequency for SST and CST.
    The authors infer this from the shape of the spectra and Cole-Cole plots, but provide no independent microstructural verification.
  • ad hoc to paper The exponent n is effectively temperature-independent in the range where scaling holds.
    Needed for the collapse to be automatic from Eq. (2), but n(T) is never reported or tested.
  • ad hoc to paper The spin-glass analogy (dipolar frustration) is a valid description of charge dynamics in these ceramics.
    No glass transition, aging, or magnetic susceptibility measurements are provided; it is an interpretive overlay.
invented entities (1)
  • Dipolar frustration / electrical glassiness
    purpose: Explains the failure of CST to obey universal scaling and motivates 'glassy' dynamics.
    No independent measurement (e.g., aging, memory, nonlinear susceptibility) is provided; it is inferred only from the scaling deviations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Scaling of the Electrical Conductivity Spectra Reveals Distinct Transport Responses in A2SmTaO6 [A = Ba, Sr, Ca]." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3XFKJGKW

@misc{pith2026250821621,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Scaling of the Electrical Conductivity Spectra Reveals Distinct Transport Responses in A2SmTaO6 [A = Ba, Sr, Ca]},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3XFKJGKW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.21621}
}
read the original abstract

Disorder plays an important role in materials science, influencing material behavior across different length scales. Imperfections like vacancies, atomic substitutions, lattice distortions, and microstructural inhomogeneities, disrupt ideal periodicity thereby altering physical properties. Analogous to spin-glass systems, electrical 'glassiness' arises when charge carriers confront disordered energy landscapes, leading to a broad range of relaxation times, especially in polycrystalline materials where dipoles experience competing exchange interactions. Complex impedance, permittivity, and electric modulus distill out separate resistive and capacitive effects, offering insights into how microstructural inhomogeneities affects conduction mechanism. In polycrystalline double perovskites A2SmTaO6 (A = Ba, Ca), with a power law driven ac conductivity, the hopping and relaxation of carriers is affected by both grains and grain boundaries. Scaling of ac conductivity and impedance response reveals correlation between conduction and relaxation timescales. The inhomogeneities in local energy landscape of 'frustrated' dipoles restrict the 'universality' of conduction mechanism across the bulk length scale.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Synthesis, structural and magnetic studies of the double perovskites ba2cemo6 (m= ta, nb)

    Qingdi Zhou, Peter Blanchard, Brendan J Kennedy, Emily Reynolds, Zhaoming Zhang, Wojciech Miiller, Jade B Aitken, Maxim Avdeev, Ling-Yun Jang, and Justin A Kimpton. Synthesis, structural and magnetic studies of the double perovskites ba2cemo6 (m= ta, nb). Chemistry of Materials , 24(15):2978–2986, 2012

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Half-metallic double per- ovskite oxides: recent developments and future perspec- tives

    Qingkai Tang and Xinhua Zhu. Half-metallic double per- ovskite oxides: recent developments and future perspec- tives. Journal of Materials Chemistry C , 10(41):15301– 15338, 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Magnetoresistance in ordered and disordered double perovskite oxide, sr2femoo6

    DD Sarma, EV Sampathkumaran, Sugata Ray, R Na- garajan, Subham Majumdar, Ashwani Kumar, G Nalini, and TN Guru Row. Magnetoresistance in ordered and disordered double perovskite oxide, sr2femoo6. Solid State Communications, 114(9):465–468, 2000

    work page 2000

  4. [4]

    Rare earth double perovskites: a fertile soil in the field of perovskite oxides

    Xiaoyun Chen, Jun Xu, Yueshan Xu, Feng Luo, and Yap- ing Du. Rare earth double perovskites: a fertile soil in the field of perovskite oxides. Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers, 6(9):2226–2238, 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Insights into cationic ordering in re-based double perovskite oxides

    Tae-Won Lim, Sung-Dae Kim, Kil-Dong Sung, Young- Mok Rhyim, Hyungjeen Jeen, Jondo Yun, Kwang-Ho Kim, Ki-Myung Song, Seongsu Lee, Sung-Yoon Chung, et al. Insights into cationic ordering in re-based double perovskite oxides. Scientific reports, 6(1):19746, 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Dielectric relaxation of the dou- ble perovskite oxide ba 2 prruo 6

    Jenq-Wei Chen, Kuan Ru Chiou, An-Chih Hsueh, and Ching-Ray Chang. Dielectric relaxation of the dou- ble perovskite oxide ba 2 prruo 6. RSC advances , 9(22):12319–12324, 2019

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Double perovskite sr2fereo6 oxides: Structural, dielectric, magnetic, electrical, and optical properties

    Kai Leng, Qingkai Tang, Zhiwei Wu, Kang Yi, and Xin- hua Zhu. Double perovskite sr2fereo6 oxides: Structural, dielectric, magnetic, electrical, and optical properties. Journal of the American Ceramic Society , 105(6):4097– 4107, 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Ex- change bias and spin glass states driven by antisite disor- der in the double perovskite compound lasrcofeo 6

    RC Sahoo, Y Takeuchi, A Ohtomo, and Z Hossain. Ex- change bias and spin glass states driven by antisite disor- der in the double perovskite compound lasrcofeo 6. Phys- ical Review B , 100(21):214436, 2019

    work page 2019

Show all 34 references
  1. [9]

    Cluster spin glass formation in the double double perovskite camnfetao6

    Padraig Kearins, Elena Solana-Madruga, Kunlang Ji, Clemens Ritter, and J Paul Attfield. Cluster spin glass formation in the double double perovskite camnfetao6. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C , 125(17):9550– 9555, 2021

    2021

  2. [10]

    Oxide perovskites, dou- ble perovskites and derivatives for electrocatalysis, pho- tocatalysis, and photovoltaics

    Wan-Jian Yin, Baicheng Weng, Jie Ge, Qingde Sun, Zhenzhu Li, and Yanfa Yan. Oxide perovskites, dou- ble perovskites and derivatives for electrocatalysis, pho- tocatalysis, and photovoltaics. Energy & Environmental Science, 12(2):442–462, 2019

    2019

  3. [11]

    A tailored direct-to-indirect band struc- ture transition in double perovskite oxides influences its photocatalysis efficiency

    Saswata Halder, Ram Awdhesh Kumar, Ritwik Maity, and TP Sinha. A tailored direct-to-indirect band struc- ture transition in double perovskite oxides influences its photocatalysis efficiency. Ceramics International , 49(5):8634–8645, 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    A review on research progress of double perovskite oxides for oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysts and supercapacitors

    Liangdong Chen, Jie Ding, and Xinhua Zhu. A review on research progress of double perovskite oxides for oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysts and supercapacitors. RSC Applied Interfaces , 2025

    2025

  5. [13]

    Frequency-dependence of conductivity in hopping systems

    AK Jonscher. Frequency-dependence of conductivity in hopping systems. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids , 8:293–315, 1972

    1972

  6. [14]

    A new understanding of the dielec- tric relaxation of solids

    AK Jonscher. A new understanding of the dielec- tric relaxation of solids. Journal of materials science , 16(8):2037–2060, 1981

  7. [15]

    Ac conduc- tivity in ionically conducting crystals and glasses

    WK Lee, BS Lim, JF Liu, and AS Nowick. Ac conduc- tivity in ionically conducting crystals and glasses. Solid State Ionics , 53:831–836, 1992

    1992

  8. [16]

    Ac conductivity of amorphous semi- conductors

    Abhai Mansingh. Ac conductivity of amorphous semi- conductors. Bulletin of Materials Science , 2(5):325–351, 1980

    1980

  9. [17]

    Ac conductivity of amorphous and polycrystalline cd3as2 films on single crystal substrates of al2o3

    AA Morocho, EA Pilyuk, VS Zakhvalinskii, TB Nikulicheva, MN Yapryntsev, and V Yu Novikov. Ac conductivity of amorphous and polycrystalline cd3as2 films on single crystal substrates of al2o3. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 638:413927, 2022

    2022

  10. [18]

    Universal frequency-dependent ac conductivity of con- ducting polymer networks

    AN Papathanassiou, I Sakellis, and J Grammatikakis. Universal frequency-dependent ac conductivity of con- ducting polymer networks. Applied Physics Letters , 91(12), 2007

    2007

  11. [19]

    Ac conductivity of transition metal 7 oxide doped glassy nanocomposite systems: temperature and frequency dependency

    Anindya Sundar Das, Madhab Roy, Dipankar Biswas, Ranadip Kundu, Amartya Acharya, Debasish Roy, and Sanjib Bhattacharya. Ac conductivity of transition metal 7 oxide doped glassy nanocomposite systems: temperature and frequency dependency. Materials Research Express, 5(9):095201, 2018

    2018

  12. [20]

    Experimental and theoretical study of ac electrical conduction mech- anisms of organic–inorganic hybrid compound bis (4- acetylanilinium) tetrachlorocadmiate (ii)

    A Jellibi, I Chaabane, and K Guidara. Experimental and theoretical study of ac electrical conduction mech- anisms of organic–inorganic hybrid compound bis (4- acetylanilinium) tetrachlorocadmiate (ii). Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures , 80:155– 162, 2016

    2016

  13. [21]

    The influence of frequency and temperature on the ac- conductivity in semiconductor single crystal

    Mohamed M Fangary and Muhammad AO Ahmed. The influence of frequency and temperature on the ac- conductivity in semiconductor single crystal. Scientific Reports, 15(1):5162, 2025

    2025

  14. [22]

    Universality of ac conduction in disordered solids

    Jeppe C Dyre and Thomas B Schrøder. Universality of ac conduction in disordered solids. Reviews of Modern Physics, 72(3):873, 2000

    2000

  15. [23]

    Time– temperature superposition in the grain and grain bound- ary response regime of a 2 horuo 6 (a= ba, sr, ca) double perovskite ceramics: a conductivity spectroscopic analy- sis

    Saswata Halder, Alo Dutta, and TP Sinha. Time– temperature superposition in the grain and grain bound- ary response regime of a 2 horuo 6 (a= ba, sr, ca) double perovskite ceramics: a conductivity spectroscopic analy- sis. RSC Advances, 7(69):43812–43825, 2017

    2017

  16. [24]

    Universal low-frequency behaviour in the ac hopping conductivity of disordered systems

    S Summerfield. Universal low-frequency behaviour in the ac hopping conductivity of disordered systems. Philo- sophical Magazine B , 52(1):9–22, 1985

    1985

  17. [25]

    Scaling of the conductivity spectra in ionic glasses: dependence on the structure

    A Ghosh and A Pan. Scaling of the conductivity spectra in ionic glasses: dependence on the structure. Physical review letters, 84(10):2188, 2000

    2000

  18. [26]

    Conductivity spectra of sodium fluorozirconate glasses

    A Ghosh and M Sural. Conductivity spectra of sodium fluorozirconate glasses. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 114(7):3243–3247, 2001

    2001

  19. [27]

    Exploring the intricacies in the conduction mechanism of the perovskite series ba2hosb1- xruxo6: A conductivity scaling approach

    Saswata Halder, Ram Awdhesh Kumar, Alo Dutta, and TP Sinha. Exploring the intricacies in the conduction mechanism of the perovskite series ba2hosb1- xruxo6: A conductivity scaling approach. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids , 138:109265, 2020

    2020

  20. [28]

    Dielectric phenomena in solids

    Kwan Chi Kao. Dielectric phenomena in solids . Elsevier, 2004

    2004

  21. [29]

    Dielectric relaxation and collective vibrational modes of double-perovskites a 2 smtao 6 (a= ba, sr and ca)

    Binita Ghosh, Saswata Halder, and Tripurari Prasad Sinha. Dielectric relaxation and collective vibrational modes of double-perovskites a 2 smtao 6 (a= ba, sr and ca). Journal of the American Ceramic Society , 97(8):2564–2572, 2014

    2014

  22. [30]

    X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic study and electronic structure of double-perovskites a2smtao6 (a= ba, sr, ca)

    Binita Ghosh, Saswata Halder, Santiranjan Shannigrahi, and TP Sinha. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic study and electronic structure of double-perovskites a2smtao6 (a= ba, sr, ca). Solid State Sciences , 67:114–118, 2017

    2017

  23. [31]

    Electronic structure and electrical conduction by polaron hopping mechanism in a2lutao6 (a= ba, sr, ca) double perovskite oxides

    Saswata Halder, Md Sariful Sheikh, Binita Ghosh, and TP Sinha. Electronic structure and electrical conduction by polaron hopping mechanism in a2lutao6 (a= ba, sr, ca) double perovskite oxides. Ceramics International , 43(14):11097–11108, 2017

    2017

  24. [32]

    Magnetic anomalies in the spin-chain compound sr 3 cu rh o 6: Griffiths- phase-like behavior of magnetic susceptibility

    EV Sampathkumaran, Niharika Mohapatra, Sudhindra Rayaprol, and Kartik K Iyer. Magnetic anomalies in the spin-chain compound sr 3 cu rh o 6: Griffiths- phase-like behavior of magnetic susceptibility. Physi- cal Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , 75(5):052412, 2007

    2007

  25. [33]

    Observation of magnetoelastic and magnetoelectric coupling in sc doped bafe12o19 due to spin-glass-like phase

    Surbhi Gupta, Sanjay Kumar Upadhyay, V Siruguri, VG Sathe, and EV Sampathkumaran. Observation of magnetoelastic and magnetoelectric coupling in sc doped bafe12o19 due to spin-glass-like phase. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , 31(29):295701, 2019

    2019

  26. [34]

    Spectral distribution of relaxation times in spin glasses

    A P Murani. Spectral distribution of relaxation times in spin glasses. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Mate- rials, 22(3):271–281, 1981

    1981

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.