pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.22592 · v2 · pith:3YDVDWOXnew · submitted 2025-10-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · hep-ph

Probing Axion-Photon conversion via circular polarization imprints in the CMB V-mode observations

Ashu Kushwaha , Rajeev Kumar Jain This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 20:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO hep-ph
keywords axion-photon conversionCMB circular polarizationhelical magnetic fieldsALP constraintsV-mode observationsresonant conversion
0
0 comments X

The pith

Axion-photon conversion in helical magnetic fields imprints circular polarization on the CMB.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that resonant axion-photon conversion in a pre-existing helical magnetic field produces photons with net circular polarization, which imprints on the cosmic microwave background. This effect arises when the axion mass nearly matches the effective photon mass, generating an excess V-mode signal measurable in the angular power spectrum. If correct, existing observations such as those from CLASS at 40 GHz could constrain axion-like particle masses in the 10^{-10} to 10^{-8} eV range and their photon coupling strength, for optimistic nanogauss field strengths. This approach would open a new cosmological window on previously unconstrained ALP parameter space.

Core claim

A helical magnetic field existing prior to the CMB epoch can generate an excess population of photons carrying net circular polarization due to the axion-photon conversion mechanism, enabling current measurements of the V-mode angular power spectrum to constrain ALP mass and coupling parameters.

What carries the argument

Resonant axion-photon conversion, occurring when axion mass equals effective photon mass in a helical background magnetic field, which produces net circular polarization in converted photons.

If this is right

  • CLASS observations at 40 GHz can probe previously unconstrained axion-photon coupling regions for ALP masses in the 10^{-10}-10^{-8} eV range.
  • The V-mode power spectrum serves as a direct observable for the conversion-induced circular polarization.
  • This method applies specifically under optimistic conditions of maximally helical nanogauss magnetic fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Confirmation would link primordial magnetic field properties to laboratory and astrophysical axion searches.
  • Improved V-mode sensitivity in future experiments could widen the accessible ALP mass window.
  • The approach may generalize to other frequency bands where resonant conversion occurs.

Load-bearing premise

A helical magnetic field with strength around one nanogauss and maximal helicity must have existed prior to the CMB epoch and survived until the epoch of resonant axion-photon conversion.

What would settle it

Null detection of the predicted excess V-mode power at 40 GHz in CLASS data, or measurements inconsistent with the expected signal for ALP masses between 10^{-10} and 10^{-8} eV under nanogauss helical field assumptions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.22592 by Ashu Kushwaha, Rajeev Kumar Jain.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The conversion probability for three typical ALPs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The resulting constraints plot on the ALPs parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The behaviour of various terms in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Left plot: shows the mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In the presence of a background magnetic field, axions or axion-like particles (ALPs) can be resonantly converted to photons when their mass is nearly equal to the effective photon mass. In this paper, we propose a novel method to constrain the parameter space of ALPs by investigating the resulting imprints of axion-photon conversion in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations. We show that a helical magnetic field existing prior to the CMB epoch can generate an excess population of photons carrying net circular polarization due to the axion-photon conversion mechanism. Consequently, current measurements of the angular power spectrum of circular polarization ($V$-mode) in the CMB can be used to constrain the parameter space of ALP mass and its coupling to photons. In the optimistic scenario of a maximally helical magnetic field with strength $\sim {\rm nG}$, we find that CLASS observations at $40 \, {\rm GHz}$ can probe the previously unconstrained regions of axion-photon coupling corresponding to ALP masses in the range $10^{-10}-10^{-8} \, {\rm eV}$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes using resonant axion-photon conversion in a helical primordial magnetic field to generate excess circular polarization (V-mode) in the CMB. It argues that existing or upcoming CLASS observations at 40 GHz can thereby constrain the axion-photon coupling g_{aγ} for ALP masses in the range 10^{-10}–10^{-8} eV, specifically in the optimistic case of a maximally helical field with strength ∼ nG that exists prior to recombination and persists to the resonance epoch.

Significance. If the magnetic-field assumptions are realized and the conversion mechanism is correctly modeled, the work would open a new observational channel for ALP parameter space that is currently unconstrained by other probes, leveraging V-mode data that are already being collected. The approach connects ALP physics to the helicity of early-universe magnetic fields in a potentially falsifiable way.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and mechanism description] Abstract and mechanism description: The headline sensitivity claim for CLASS 40 GHz data is predicated on the existence of a maximally helical ∼ nG magnetic field prior to the CMB epoch that survives intact until the redshift at which m_a equals the plasma frequency. Without quantitative justification for the field's amplitude, helicity fraction, and survival against decay or damping, the predicted V-mode excess vanishes and the derived constraint on g_{aγ} does not apply. This assumption is load-bearing for the central result.
  2. [Abstract] The manuscript does not appear to provide an explicit error budget, comparison against other sources of circular polarization (e.g., Faraday rotation, instrumental leakage), or a parameter scan over magnetic-field strength and helicity. These omissions make it difficult to assess how robust the quoted sensitivity remains when the optimistic scenario is relaxed.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Notation for the ALP mass and coupling should be defined consistently at first use, and the frequency dependence of the resonance condition should be stated explicitly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address the major points below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the assumptions and robustness of the results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and mechanism description] Abstract and mechanism description: The headline sensitivity claim for CLASS 40 GHz data is predicated on the existence of a maximally helical ∼ nG magnetic field prior to the CMB epoch that survives intact until the redshift at which m_a equals the plasma frequency. Without quantitative justification for the field's amplitude, helicity fraction, and survival against decay or damping, the predicted V-mode excess vanishes and the derived constraint on g_{aγ} does not apply. This assumption is load-bearing for the central result.

    Authors: We agree that the quoted sensitivity is conditional on the optimistic magnetic-field assumptions and that these assumptions require clearer justification. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the relevant discussion (new paragraph in the introduction and an extended subsection in the conclusions) to include quantitative estimates, drawn from the existing literature, for the survival of maximally helical fields against damping and decay down to the resonance epoch. We also clarify that the headline constraint applies specifically to this optimistic case and have added a short scaling analysis showing how the V-mode amplitude and resulting g_{aγ} bound weaken for lower field strengths or reduced helicity fractions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The manuscript does not appear to provide an explicit error budget, comparison against other sources of circular polarization (e.g., Faraday rotation, instrumental leakage), or a parameter scan over magnetic-field strength and helicity. These omissions make it difficult to assess how robust the quoted sensitivity remains when the optimistic scenario is relaxed.

    Authors: We acknowledge these omissions in the original version. The revised manuscript now contains a dedicated subsection that presents an error budget for the V-mode measurement, including order-of-magnitude estimates for contamination from Faraday rotation and instrumental leakage, together with a brief discussion of how these can be separated from the axion-induced signal. We have also added a parameter scan over magnetic-field amplitude and helicity fraction, shown in a new figure, that illustrates the dependence of the derived g_{aγ} limits on these quantities. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; forward calculation from physics assumptions to sensitivity forecast

full rationale

The paper derives the expected V-mode excess from resonant axion-photon conversion in a postulated pre-CMB helical magnetic field using standard plasma and conversion physics, then computes the resulting constraint reach for CLASS 40 GHz data under an explicit optimistic scenario (∼nG maximal helicity). This is a parameter-space forecast, not a fit to the target data or a redefinition of inputs. No equations reduce the claimed probe region to fitted parameters by construction, and no self-citation chain is required to close the central argument. The magnetic-field assumption is stated as an external optimistic input rather than derived from the V-mode observations themselves.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence and properties of a pre-CMB helical magnetic field and on the standard resonant conversion condition; these are not derived within the paper but taken as inputs.

free parameters (2)
  • magnetic field strength
    Set to ∼ nG in the optimistic scenario; this value directly determines the predicted signal amplitude.
  • helicity fraction
    Assumed maximal (100 %) to maximize the circular polarization signal.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Resonant axion-photon conversion occurs when ALP mass approximately equals effective photon mass in the background plasma.
    Invoked in the first sentence of the abstract as the conversion mechanism.
  • domain assumption A helical magnetic field existed prior to the CMB epoch.
    Stated as the source of net circular polarization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5724 in / 1468 out tokens · 31518 ms · 2026-05-21T20:59:09.793944+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages · 43 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    We present our derived constraints on the ALP param- eter space (g ϕγ, mϕ) in Fig

    at frequencies 95 GHz and 150 GHz are≤783µK 2 and≤141µK 2, respectively. We present our derived constraints on the ALP param- eter space (g ϕγ, mϕ) in Fig. 2 using the latestV-mode measurements from SPIDER and CLASS, alongside ex- isting bounds from magnetic white dwarf polarization (green shaded region) [93, 94]. Notably, the CLASS re- sults provide the ...

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization

    A. Kosowsky, Annals Phys.246, 49 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9501045

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  3. [3]

    A CMB Polarization Primer

    W. Hu and M. J. White, New Astron.2, 323 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9706147

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  4. [4]

    The Quest for B Modes from Inflationary Gravitational Waves

    M. Kamionkowski and E. D. Kovetz, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.54, 227 (2016), arXiv:1510.06042 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Durrer,The Cosmic Microwave Background(Cambridge University Press, 2020)

    R. Durrer,The Cosmic Microwave Background(Cambridge University Press, 2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Komatsu, Nature Rev

    E. Komatsu, Nature Rev. Phys.4, 452 (2022), arXiv:2202.13919 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Generation of circular polarization in CMB radiation via nonlinear photon-photon interaction

    M. Sadegh, R. Mohammadi, and I. Motie, Phys. Rev. D97, 023023 (2018), arXiv:1711.06997 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Inomata and M

    K. Inomata and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 031305 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    Hoseinpour, M

    A. Hoseinpour, M. Zarei, G. Orlando, N. Bartolo, and S. Matarrese, Phys. Rev. D102, 063501 (2020), arXiv:2006.14418 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    Photon-graviton scattering: A new way to detect anisotropic gravitational waves?

    N. Bartolo, A. Hoseinpour, G. Orlando, S. Matarrese, and M. Zarei, Phys. Rev. D98, 023518 (2018), arXiv:1804.06298 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    Rotation of Linear Polarization Plane and Circular Polarization from Cosmological Pseudoscalar Fields

    F. Finelli and M. Galaverni, Phys. Rev. D79, 063002 (2009), arXiv:0802.4210 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  12. [12]

    Circular Polarization of the CMB: A probe of the First stars

    S. De and H. Tashiro, Phys. Rev. D92, 123506 (2015), arXiv:1401.1371 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  13. [13]

    Giovannini, Phys

    M. Giovannini, Phys. Rev. D80, 123013 (2009)

    work page 2009

  14. [14]

    A circular polarimeter for the Cosmic Microwave Background

    M. Giovannini, JCAP08, 028 (2010), arXiv:1003.5892 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  15. [15]

    V-mode Polarization in Axion Inflation and Preheating

    S. Alexander, E. McDonough, and R. Sims, Phys. Rev. D96, 063506 (2017), arXiv:1704.00838 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    Alexander and E

    S. Alexander and E. McDonough, Phys. Lett. B0370, 2693 (2018), arXiv:1811.05953 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2018

  17. [17]

    Alexander, E

    S. Alexander, E. McDonough, A. Pullen, and B. Shapiro, JCAP01, 032 (2020), arXiv:1911.01418 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    An improved upper limit to the CMB circular polarization at large angular scales

    R. Mainini, D. Minelli, M. Gervasi, G. Boella, G. Sironi, A. Ba´ u, S. Banfi, A. Passerini, A. De Lucia, and F. Cavaliere, JCAP08, 033 (2013), arXiv:1307.6090 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  19. [19]

    J. M. Nagyet al.(SPIDER), Astrophys. J.844, 151 (2017), arXiv:1704.00215 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    I. L. Padillaet al., (2019), 10.3847/1538-4357/ab61f8, arXiv:1911.00391 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab61f8 2019

  21. [21]

    J. R. Eimer, Y. Li, M. K. Brewer, R. Shi, A. Ali, J. W. Appel, C. L. Bennett, S. M. Bruno, R. Bustos, D. T. Chuss, J. Cleary, S. Dahal, R. Datta, J. Denes Couto, K. L. Denis, R. D¨ unner, T. Essinger-Hileman, P. Flux´ a, J. Hubmayer, K. Harrington, J. Iuliano, J. Karakla, T. A. Marriage, C. N´ u˜ nez, L. Parker, M. A. Petroff, R. A. Reeves, K. Rostem, D. ...

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. Lett.38, 1440 (1977)

    work page 1977

  23. [23]

    Weinberg, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 223 (1978)

    work page 1978

  24. [24]

    D. J. E. Marsh, Phys. Rept.643, 1 (2016), arXiv:1510.07633 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    C. A. J. O’Hare, PoSCOSMICWISPers, 040 (2024), arXiv:2403.17697 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Axion Cosmology

    P. Sikivie, Lect. Notes Phys.741, 19 (2008), arXiv:astro-ph/0610440

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  27. [27]

    Axions : Theory and Cosmological Role

    M. Kawasaki and K. Nakayama, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.63, 69 (2013), arXiv:1301.1123 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  28. [28]

    Sikivie, Rev

    P. Sikivie, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 015004 (2021), arXiv:2003.02206 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    Sikivie, Phys

    P. Sikivie, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 1415 (1983), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 52, 695 (1984)]

    work page 1983

  30. [30]

    Raffelt and L

    G. Raffelt and L. Stodolsky, Phys. Rev. D37, 1237 (1988)

    work page 1988

  31. [31]

    Harari and P

    D. Harari and P. Sikivie, Physics Letters B289, 67 (1992)

    work page 1992

  32. [32]

    Revisiting the SN1987A gamma-ray limit on ultralight axion-like particles

    A. Payez, C. Evoli, T. Fischer, M. Giannotti, A. Mirizzi, and A. Ringwald, JCAP02, 006 (2015), arXiv:1410.3747 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  33. [33]

    New CAST Limit on the Axion-Photon Interaction

    V. Anastassopouloset al.(CAST), Nature Phys.13, 584 (2017), arXiv:1705.02290 [hep-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    Hunting Axion Dark Matter with Protoplanetary Disk Polarimetry

    T. Fujita, R. Tazaki, and K. Toma, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 191101 (2019), arXiv:1811.03525 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Optical Ring Cavity Search for Axion Dark Matter

    I. Obata, T. Fujita, and Y. Michimura, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 161301 (2018), arXiv:1805.11753 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  36. [36]

    M. A. Fedderke, P. W. Graham, and S. Rajendran, Phys. Rev. D100, 015040 (2019), arXiv:1903.02666 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    Zhang, E

    D. Zhang, E. G. M. Ferreira, I. Obata, and T. Namikawa, Phys. Rev. D110, 103525 (2024), arXiv:2408.08063 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Taruya, A

    A. Taruya, A. Nishizawa, and Y. Himemoto, (2025), arXiv:2509.14673 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Dimming of Supernovae by Photon-Pseudoscalar Conversion and the Intergalactic Plasma

    C. Deffayet, D. Harari, J.-P. Uzan, and M. Zaldarriaga, Phys. Rev. D66, 043517 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0112118

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  40. [40]

    Diffuse axion-like particle searches

    H. Vogel, R. Laha, and M. Meyer, PoSNOW2018, 091 (2019), arXiv:1712.01839 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Polarized anisotropic spectral distortions of the CMB: Galactic and extragalactic constraints on photon-axion conversion

    S. Mukherjee, R. Khatri, and B. D. Wandelt, JCAP04, 045 (2018), arXiv:1801.09701 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    A. Hook, G. Marques-Tavares, and C. Ristow, JHEP05, 086 (2024), arXiv:2306.13135 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Setabuddin, M. R. Haque, R. Karmakar, and S. Pal, (2025), arXiv:2509.09472 [astro-ph.CO]. 11

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    B. Cyr, J. Chluba, and P. B. G. Manoj, (2024), arXiv:2411.13701 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Chluba, (2025), arXiv:2502.05188 [astro-ph.CO]

    J. Chluba, (2025), arXiv:2502.05188 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    M. E. Gertsenshtein, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics14(1962)

    work page 1962

  47. [47]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics38, 652 (1974)

    work page 1974

  48. [48]

    Chen, Phys

    P. Chen, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 634 (1995), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 74, 3091 (1995)]

    work page 1995

  49. [49]

    One loop photon-graviton mixing in an electromagnetic field: Part 1

    F. Bastianelli and C. Schubert, JHEP02, 069 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0412095

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  50. [50]

    One loop photon-graviton mixing in an electromagnetic field: Part 2

    F. Bastianelli, U. Nucamendi, C. Schubert, and V. M. Villanueva, JHEP11, 099 (2007), arXiv:0710.5572 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  51. [51]

    Constraining Primordial Magnetic Fields by CMB Photon-Graviton Conversion

    P. Chen and T. Suyama, Phys. Rev. D88, 123521 (2013), arXiv:1309.0537 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  52. [52]

    A. D. Dolgov and D. Ejlli, JCAP12, 003 (2012), arXiv:1211.0500 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  53. [53]

    A. D. Dolgov and D. Ejlli, Phys. Rev. D87, 104007 (2013), arXiv:1303.1556 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  54. [54]

    Fujita, K

    T. Fujita, K. Kamada, and Y. Nakai, Phys. Rev. D102, 103501 (2020), arXiv:2002.07548 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    Domcke and C

    V. Domcke and C. Garcia-Cely, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 021104 (2021)

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    Domcke, C

    V. Domcke, C. Garcia-Cely, and N. L. Rodd, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 041101 (2022), arXiv:2202.00695 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  57. [57]

    Kushwaha, S

    A. Kushwaha, S. Malik, and S. Shankaranarayanan, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.527, 4378 (2023), arXiv:2202.00032 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    Kushwaha, S

    A. Kushwaha, S. Malik, and S. Shankaranarayanan, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D32, 2342010 (2023), arXiv:2311.11150 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    Palessandro and T

    A. Palessandro and T. Rothman, Phys. Dark Univ.40, 101187 (2023), arXiv:2301.02072 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  60. [60]

    A. D. Dolgov, L. A. Panasenko, and V. A. Bochko, Universe10, 7 (2024), arXiv:2310.19838 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Y. He, S. K. Giri, R. Sharma, S. Mtchedlidze, and I. Georgiev, JCAP05, 051 (2024), arXiv:2312.17636 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Kushwaha and R

    A. Kushwaha and R. K. Jain, Phys. Rev. D112, L021301 (2025), arXiv:2502.12517 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    K. M. W. Pappaset al., (2025), arXiv:2505.02821 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Domcke, C

    V. Domcke, C. Garcia-Cely, and S. M. Lee, (2025), arXiv:2507.16609 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Yao, X.-J

    R.-M. Yao, X.-J. Bi, J.-W. Wang, and P.-F. Yin, Phys. Rev. D107, 043031 (2023), arXiv:2209.14214 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Shakeri and F

    S. Shakeri and F. Hajkarim, JCAP04, 017 (2023), arXiv:2209.13572 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  67. [67]

    Signatures of axion-like particles in the spectra of TeV gamma-ray sources

    A. Mirizzi, G. G. Raffelt, and P. D. Serpico, Phys. Rev. D76, 023001 (2007), arXiv:0704.3044 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  68. [68]

    Addazi, S

    A. Addazi, S. Capozziello, Q. Gan, G. Lambiase, and R. Samanta, (2024), arXiv:2411.09042 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    Photon-axion conversion as a mechanism for supernova dimming: Limits from CMB spectral distortion

    A. Mirizzi, G. G. Raffelt, and P. D. Serpico, Phys. Rev. D72, 023501 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0506078

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  70. [70]

    Microwave Background Constraints on Mixing of Photons with Hidden Photons

    A. Mirizzi, J. Redondo, and G. Sigl, JCAP03, 026 (2009), arXiv:0901.0014 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  71. [71]

    Constraining resonant photon-axion conversions in the Early Universe

    A. Mirizzi, J. Redondo, and G. Sigl, JCAP08, 001 (2009), arXiv:0905.4865 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  72. [72]

    Can slow roll inflation induce relevant helical magnetic fields?

    R. Durrer, L. Hollenstein, and R. K. Jain, JCAP1103, 037 (2011), arXiv:1005.5322 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  73. [73]

    C. T. Byrnes, L. Hollenstein, R. K. Jain, and F. R. Urban, JCAP03, 009 (2012), arXiv:1111.2030 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  74. [74]

    Cosmological Magnetic Fields: Their Generation, Evolution and Observation

    R. Durrer and A. Neronov, Astron. Astrophys. Rev.21, 62 (2013), arXiv:1303.7121 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  75. [75]

    The origin, evolution and signatures of primordial magnetic fields

    K. Subramanian, Rept. Prog. Phys.79, 076901 (2016), arXiv:1504.02311 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  76. [76]

    The generation of helical magnetic field in a viable scenario of Inflationary Magnetogenesis

    R. Sharma, K. Subramanian, and T. R. Seshadri, Phy.Rev. DD97, 083503 (2018), arXiv:1802.04847 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  77. [77]

    Kushwaha and S

    A. Kushwaha and S. Shankaranarayanan, Phys. Rev. D102, 103528 (2020), arXiv:2008.10825 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  78. [78]

    Kushwaha and S

    A. Kushwaha and S. Shankaranarayanan, Phys. Rev. D104, 063502 (2021), arXiv:2103.05339 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  79. [79]

    P. P. Kronberg, Rept. Prog. Phys.57, 325 (1994)

    work page 1994

  80. [80]

    R. Beck, A. Brandenburg, D. Moss, A. Shukurov, and D. Sokoloff, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics34, 155 (1996)

    work page 1996

Showing first 80 references.