Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 56 references

Breakdown of the optical saturation regime in molecular single-photon emitters

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Under strong continuous-wave driving, single DBT molecules in anthracene stop behaving like two-level systems: fluorescence collapses and the linewidth broadens, an 'anomalous saturation' the paper attributes to excited-state absorption int

desk verdict The TLS-saturation breakdown in DBT:Ac is real, reproducible, and new; the paper's exclusion of heating is not independent, so it deserves a serious referee but not a pass as-is. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.00596 v1 pith:3YMVFHP6 submitted 2026-08-01 quant-ph physics.optics

Hugo Levy-Falk , Daniele De Bernardis , Elena Fanella , Louise Morlaës , Costanza Toninelli This is my paper
classification quant-phphysics.optics
keywords anomaloussaturationdibenzoterrylenesingle-moleculeemittertwo-levelsystembreakdownexcited-stateabsorptionpowerbroadeningquantumnanophotonicscontinuous-wave
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that DBT molecules in anthracene nanocrystals, a standard solid-state single-photon source, depart from the effective two-level description under strong continuous-wave illumination. Instead of plateauing at saturation, their emission drops sharply at high resonant pump power while the zero-phonon line broadens more than the optical Bloch equations predict. Heating and intersystem crossing are ruled out by independent calibrations, and both the fluorescence suppression and the linewidth broadening are reproduced by a model in which the excited state absorbs a photon into a short-lived dark state at a rate linear in intensity. If this is right, saturation experiments on these emitters must include the excited-state absorption channel, and reaching full population inversion under continuous wave is impossible—pulsed excitation is the way forward.

What carries the argument

The central object is the anomaly parameter ξ = γ_ESA(I_sat)/γ_1, the ratio of the excited-state absorption rate at saturation to the natural decay rate. It transforms the usual saturation law into R̃ = R∞ S / [(1+ξS)² + S], modifies the power-broadened linewidth through the effective decay rate γ̃₁ = γ₁ + γ_ESA(I), and enters the Debye-Waller extraction. A single ξ≈0.008 reproduces fluorescence, linewidth, and Debye-Waller data, while a two-photon absorption model fits markedly worse.

What would settle it

Tune the strong driver to the resonance and simultaneously probe the predicted ESA transition with a second, weak laser; if the extra quenching or linewidth broadening changes when the probe hits the ESA frequency, the dark-state pathway is confirmed. If instead the depletion rate scales as intensity squared rather than linearly, or no probe response appears while the molecule is in |e⟩, the single-photon ESA model collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For single DBT molecules in anthracene nanocrystals, resonant continuous-wave driving above roughly 10^3 W/cm^2 breaks the standard saturation law. After reaching the expected plateau, the molecule dims as intensity increases, and the zero-phonon-line width grows beyond the power-broadened two-level prediction. The authors rule out heating by comparing Debye-Waller factors from intensity scans with direct cryostat-temperature scans, and rule out intersystem crossing by showing its probability decreases with power. They then model the effect as an intensity-dependent decay channel from the excited state into a short-lived dark state, yielding a universal saturation curve with a single anomaly

Load-bearing premise

The whole explanation rests on the assumption that the extra, nonthermal linewidth comes from an excited-state absorption channel whose rate grows linearly with intensity—a dark state the experiment never directly observes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Above the threshold ξS = 1, continuous-wave saturation measurements on DBT:anthracene will misread as dimmer emission and broader lines unless the excited-state absorption channel is included in the model.
  • Pulsed resonant excitation shorter than the excited-state lifetime can reach full population inversion, because the Rabi frequency scales as √I while the ESA rate scales as I.
  • Matrix quality is a control knob: molecules in high-quality sublimated anthracene crystals show much smaller anomaly parameters, so sample preparation can suppress the quenching.
  • The anomalous saturation is reversible with laser power and reproducible across more than 20 molecules, ruling out photobleaching and experimental artefacts.
  • The same model predicts a stronger anomaly under off-resonant pumping, so experiments using 0–1 vibrational pumping need to account for a larger depletion channel.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct pump-probe test of the predicted ESA transition—a second weak laser tuned near the ZPL while the molecule is in |e⟩—would confirm the dark-state pathway without relying on saturation-curve fitting; the paper does not report such a measurement.
  • Since ξ correlates with laser-induced ZPL shifts and worsens in nanocrystals relative to sublimated crystals, the depletion channel is likely shaped by photo-generated charges in the anthracene host; a testable extension is that co-doping or charge-depleting illumination should reduce ξ.
  • At very high CW intensity, the model implies the emitter spends most of its time shelved in the dark state; this should show up as an intensity-dependent bunching or antibunching signature in g(2)(τ) that is distinct from the ISC signature the paper already separates.
  • The predicted ratio ξ_res/ξ_off, set by the 0–1 Franck-Condon factor, could be checked independently by measuring that Franck-Condon factor directly, providing a quantitative test of the model beyond the fits reported here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports that single DBT molecules in anthracene nanocrystals, under strong continuous-wave resonant excitation, deviate from the expected two-level-system (TLS) saturation behavior: after reaching the saturation plateau, the fluorescence is strongly suppressed, and the ZPL linewidth broadens beyond the TLS power-broadening prediction. A similar, even stronger suppression is observed under off-resonant (0–1) incoherent pumping. The authors argue that laser-induced heating and intersystem crossing can be ruled out, and they introduce an excited-state absorption (ESA) model in which the excited state acquires an intensity-dependent decay rate γ_ESA(I)=γ_1 I/I_ESA to a short-lived dark state. This model is claimed to reproduce simultaneously the fluorescence suppression, the linewidth broadening, and the Debye–Waller factor behavior with a single dimensionless anomaly parameter ξ. The effect is shown to be reproducible in more than 20 molecules, reversible with laser power, not due to spectral redistribution, and less pronounced in higher-quality sublimated crystals. The paper concludes that the effective two-level description fails in this regime and that pulsed excitation can still reach population inversion.

Significance. If the central interpretation is correct, the paper identifies a qualitatively new photophysical regime for a leading class of single-photon emitters, with direct consequences for experiments on single molecules under strong driving, such as Mollow-triplet studies, molecular optomechanics, and cavity-QED with organic emitters. The empirical observation itself is well supported: the fluorescence drop is reproducible across many molecules, reversible (excluding photobleaching), observed under two different excitation schemes, and the photon-statistics analysis argues against a simple intersystem-crossing explanation. The paper also benefits from a transparent modeling effort and from a useful connection between the anomaly parameter and crystal quality. However, the central negative claim—that the effect is not caused by laser-induced heating—currently rests on a temperature calibration that is not independent of the proposed ESA mechanism. The reported data are strong, but the manuscript's central interpretation is not yet secured.

major comments (3)
  1. [Main text, 'Ruling out temperature'; SM Secs. S3–S5.4] The exclusion of heating is not independent. In SM Sec. S3, T_eff(I) is obtained by inverting the linewidth–temperature calibration (SM Fig. S11a–b) on the very same excess ZPL linewidth that the ESA model (SM Eq. (81) and main-text Fig. 4b) attributes to γ_ESA(I)=γ_1 I/I_ESA. If any part of that excess linewidth is nonthermal, T_eff is overestimated, and the apparent discrepancy in the Debye–Waller factor (Fig. 3 / SM Fig. S11c) is inflated by the misattribution. The off-resonant argument does not escape this problem: S_off depends on temperature through e^{-2F(T)} alone (SM Eq. (67)), so heating can suppress the off-resonant fluorescence through the Huang–Rhys factor even if dephasing is irrelevant. Without a direct local thermometry measurement or a self-consistent decomposition of the linewidth into thermal and ESA contributions, the statement that 'Laser-induced heating can be defin
  2. [SM Sec. S5.4, Eq. (75); main-text Fig. 4c] The 'experimental' Debye–Waller factor plotted as a function of intensity is not a directly measured quantity. It is extracted using Eq. (75), which assumes the TLS relations among the saturation parameter S_res, the ZPL linewidth Γ_zpl, and the DW factor. In the anomalous regime, if γ_ESA contributes to Γ_zpl, Eq. (75) no longer yields the true DW factor. Comparing this model-derived quantity with the cryostat-temperature scan therefore mixes model assumptions with the data. The authors should either present a direct spectroscopic determination of the DW factor (e.g., the ZPL-to-phonon-wing intensity ratio) or restrict the extraction to intensities where ESA is negligible and show that the temperature calibration is consistent there.
  3. [Main-text Eq. (3); SM Sec. S6] The model is fitted rather than independently predictive for the crucial comparison between resonant and off-resonant schemes. The resonant anomaly parameter ξ_res is obtained from the fluorescence saturation curve and then used to generate the linewidth and DW curves, which is a consistency check rather than a parameter-free prediction. The off-resonant parameter ξ_off is fitted separately, and the relation ξ_res/ξ_off = (I_sat^res/I_sat^off)(γ_v/γ_1) (SM Eq. (94)) is only invoked qualitatively. A quantitative test, comparing the measured ratio with an independently determined Franck–Condon factor and including uncertainties, would substantially strengthen the claim that one physical mechanism explains both schemes. The current statement that the ratio 'naturally explains' the larger off-resonant parameter is too weak to count as support.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract/Introduction] Typo in the abstract: 'anomalous saturationregime' is missing a space.
  2. [SM Sec. S3.1] Typo: 'appearence' should be 'appearance'.
  3. [Fig. 4] The two y-axis labels in panel (c) ('D.W. factor' and '2γ2/2π [Hz]') are confusing; it appears the right-hand axis is misplaced. Please clarify which quantity the line refers to.
  4. [Table I / Notation] The table lists γ_ESA with units '2π[0;10] GHz', but in the text γ_ESA(I) is a rate that grows with intensity. Please clarify whether the table entry is the scale γ_1/I_ESA or the maximum value used in the fits.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Partial circularity in the DW-factor 'prediction' and in the heating-calibration double-use; the core anomalous-saturation observation remains independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Figure 4(c) caption; SM Sec. S5.4 (Eq. 75); SM Sec. S6.1 (Eqs. 84-86)]
    "Experimental Debye-Waller factor of a DBT molecule as a function of excitation intensity. The solid black line shows the behavior predicted by the excited-state absorption model, with ξres = 0.008."

    The 'Debye-Waller factor' plotted in Fig. 4(c) is not an independently measured quantity. SM Eq. (75) defines the extracted DW factor as e^{-2F} = S sqrt(1+S)/(2π Γ_zpl) · γ1 I_sat/I, a pure function of the linewidth Γ_zpl and the saturation S already used in the ESA fit. Since ξ_res is fitted to the resonant saturation curve (SM Eqs. 84-86, main-text Eq. 3), and the same model determines Γ_zpl and S, the model's 'predicted' DW curve is obtained by feeding its own fitted outputs back through Eq. (75). The apparent DW suppression with intensity is an algebraic consequence of the fitted ξ_res, not an independent confirmation of the ESA mechanism.

  2. other [SM Sec. S3.1 / Fig. S11b; main text 'Ruling out temperature']
    "The linewidth-to-temperature map can then be used to estimate an effective temperature in the anomalous saturation scan of Fig. 1, as a function of the laser intensity T_eff(I)."

    The 'independent' temperature calibration is read from the same excess ZPL linewidth that the paper's own ESA model later attributes to γ_ESA(I) (SM Eq. 81). Thus the thermal hypothesis is tested with a thermometer that is contaminated by the proposed alternative: any nonthermal linewidth contribution inflates T_eff(I). The orders-of-magnitude discrepancy in the DW factor (Fig. 3) is therefore not a clean exclusion if part of the excess linewidth is ESA rather than thermal. The off-resonant experiment (SM Sec. S5.2) provides a partially independent check, so this does not destroy the whole heating exclusion, but the claim of an 'independent temperature calibration' is weaker than presented.

full rationale

The central observation—reproducible, reversible fluorescence suppression under strong CW drive—is not circular: it is a direct measurement compared to a parameter-free TLS saturation law. The ESA model with one fitted anomaly parameter ξ reproduces the fluorescence and linewidth; fitting one parameter to several observables is standard and not circular by itself. The formal circularity is concentrated in Fig. 4(c): the Debye-Waller factor curve is derived by Eq. (75) from the same linewidth and saturation values that the ESA model fits, so the 'prediction' is a re-expression of the fitted ξ. A second, more methodological issue is the heating exclusion, where T_eff is read off the excess linewidth that the alternative model later assigns to γ_ESA; this double-use weakens the claim of an independent temperature calibration, though the off-resonant experiment provides a partially independent leg. Self-citations were checked: Ref. [38] is external and Ref. [33] is backed by the paper's own temperature calibration, so they are not load-bearing circularity. Overall the core anomalous-saturation observation and the fluorescence/linewidth consistency retain independent content; the score reflects the partial reductions rather than a fully forced derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central observation needs no invented entity: the fluorescence drop and line broadening are raw experimental facts. The mechanistic claim rests on the dark-state model with one fitted anomaly parameter xi, on the linear ESA scaling, and on the thermal-phonon model used to rule out heating. None of these is machine-checked or reproduced from shipped artifacts, so the ledger is dominated by model assumptions.

free parameters (4)
  • Anomaly parameter xi_res = 0.008 for one molecule; 10^-3 to 10^-2 across datasets
    Free parameter in Eq. (3); fit to resonant fluorescence suppression, then reused for the linewidth and Debye-Waller curves.
  • Anomaly parameter xi_off = 0.441 for the Fig. 2 dataset; average 1.64 over 18 molecules
    Fit to off-resonant saturation curves; relation to xi_res is asserted but not independently checked.
  • Saturation intensity I_sat and asymptotic rate R_infinity per molecule = Resonant I_sat = 4.05 +/- 0.20 W/cm2; off-resonant I_sat = 15.3 kW/cm2; R_infinity varies per curve
    Standard TLS fit parameters at low power; treated as per-molecule nuisance parameters in the saturation model.
  • Thermal model activation temperatures and exponents (T_omega, T_phi, T_F, omega_cut, a, b) = Not reported as single fitted values in the main text
    Used to compute temperature-to-linewidth and Debye-Waller predictions in Secs. S3-S4; fitted to temperature scans, so the heating exclusion inherits their uncertainties.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The molecule is described by optical Bloch equations for an effective two-level system at low intensity.
    Baseline model used throughout for DBT; standard for molecular emitters but an approximation that the paper itself challenges at high intensity.
  • domain assumption The dark state is highly dissipative (gamma_d >> 2 gamma_2, gamma_v) and decays to the ground state, permitting adiabatic elimination.
    Required for the effective decay rate gamma_ESA(I) in SM Sec. S6; no direct confirmation of this hierarchy.
  • ad hoc to paper The ESA rate is linear in intensity: gamma_ESA(I) = gamma_1 I/I_ESA.
    Postulated single-photon scaling that defines the model; it is not derived from a microscopic Hamiltonian or directly measured.
  • ad hoc to paper Phonon spectral densities are polynomial with J(omega) = J omega^s e^{-omega/omega_cut}, chi(omega) = X omega^p, kappa(omega) = K omega^q, and p = 1, q = 1, r = 1.
    Chosen in SM Sec. S4.4 to make thermal integrals analytically tractable; the fitted thermal model rests on these functional forms.
  • domain assumption The phonon bath is in thermal equilibrium with Bose-Einstein occupations and Markovian dissipation.
    Used for the temperature calibration and Debye-Waller prediction in SM Sec. S4.
  • domain assumption The photon-statistics formulas of Refs. [55,56] correctly separate ISC and triplet parameters from background.
    Used in SM Sec. S7 to extract intersystem crossing rates and to exclude ISC as the dark-state mechanism.
invented entities (2)
  • Short-lived dark state |d> (or band of dark states) reached by excited-state absorption
    purpose: Introduces an intensity-dependent loss channel gamma_ESA(I) that suppresses fluorescence and broadens the line above saturation.
    No direct detection is reported; the state is inferred from fitting Eq. (3) to saturation curves. A first-principles ESA line near the ZPL is cited from Ref. [39] as a candidate but not quantitatively linked to the fitted dark state.
  • Long-lived charge states in the anthracene matrix
    purpose: Explains the matrix dependence of the anomaly parameter and its correlation with laser-induced optical frequency shifts.
    Speculative link between the observed anomaly and photo-induced charge trapping; no direct charge measurement is presented in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Breakdown of the optical saturation regime in molecular single-photon emitters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3YMVFHP6

@misc{pith2026260800596,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Breakdown of the optical saturation regime in molecular single-photon emitters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3YMVFHP6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.00596}
}
read the original abstract

Solid-state single organic molecules, such as dibenzoterrylene (DBT) in organic matrices, are prominent deterministic single-photon sources, usually modeled as effective two-level systems (TLS). We show that single DBT molecules in anthracene nanocrystals, under strong continuous-wave driving, depart from this picture: instead of the expected saturation, fluorescence is strongly suppressed at high resonant pump power, while the linewidth broadens beyond the TLS prediction -- an \emph{anomalous saturation} regime. Comparing coherent and incoherent excitation and independently calibrating temperature via phonon-induced dephasing rules out laser-induced heating and intersystem crossing. Instead, a model of intensity-dependent excited-state absorption (ESA) toward a short-lived dark state quantitatively reproduces both the fluorescence suppression and the linewidth broadening. We further show that matrix quality mitigates this quenching, and that pulsed excitation schemes are strategic toward full population inversion, with direct implications for quantum nanophotonics and molecular optomechanics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.00596 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. b and Fig. 1c. The standard TLS saturation law reads R res(I) = R res ∞ I I + I res sat , (1) with R the emission rate, I the laser intensity, I res sat the saturation intensity, and Rres ∞ the maximum fluorescence rate. This law fits the data up to ∼ 103 W/cm2 (black dashed line, fit restricted to I < 2 × 103 W/cm2 ), but a clear deviation and unexpected drop are observed in the high saturation regime. The ZPL line… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Cohen-Tannoudji, J

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg,Atom—Photon Interactions: Basic Process and Appilcations, 1st ed. (Wiley, 1998)

    work page 1998

  2. [2]

    Labont´ e, O

    L. Labont´ e, O. Alibart, V. D’Auria, F. Doutre, J. Etesse, G. Sauder, A. Martin, E. Picholle, and S. Tanzilli, Integrated photonics for quantum communications and metrology, PRX Quantum5, 010101 (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  4. [4]

    R. H. Lavroff, D. L. Pennington, A. S. Hua, B. Y. Li, J. A. Williams, and A. N. Alexandrova, Recent innovations in solid-state and molecular qubits for quantum information applications, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B125, 12111 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    F. P. G. de Arquer, D. V. Talapin, V. I. Klimov, Y. Arakawa, M. Bayer, and E. H. Sargent, Semiconductor quantum dots: Technological progress and future challenges, Science373, eaaz8541 (2021), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aaz8541

    doi:10.1126/science.aaz8541 2021

  6. [6]

    L. V. H. Rodgers, L. B. Hughes, M. Xie, P. C. Maurer, S. Kolkowitz, A. C. Bleszynski Jayich, and N. P. de Leon, Materials challenges for quantum technologies based on color centers in diamond, MRS Bulletin46, 623 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Zhong, J

    T. Zhong, J. M. Kindem, J. G. Bartholomew, J. Rochman, I. Craiciu, E. Miyazono, M. Bettinelli, E. Cavalli, V. Verma, S. W. Nam, F. Marsili, M. D. Shaw, A. D. Beyer, and A. Faraon, Nanophotonic rare-earth quantum memory with optically controlled retrieval, Science357, 1392 (2017), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.aan5959

    doi:10.1126/science.aan5959 2017

  8. [8]

    S. L. Bayliss, D. W. Laorenza, P. J. Mintun, B. D. Kovos, D. E. Freedman, and D. D. Awschalom, Optically addressable molecular spins for quantum information processing, Science370, 1309 (2020), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.abb9352

    doi:10.1126/science.abb9352 2020

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Toninelli, I

    C. Toninelli, I. Gerhardt, A. S. Clark, A. Reserbat-Plantey, S. G¨ otzinger, Z. Ristanovi´ c, M. Colautti, P. Lombardi, K. D. Major, I. Deperasi´ nska, W. H. Pernice, F. H. L. Koppens, B. Kozankiewicz, A. Gourdon, V. Sandoghdar, and M. Orrit, Single organic molecules for photo...

    2021

  2. [10]

    Heindel, J.-H

    T. Heindel, J.-H. Kim, N. Gregersen, A. Rastelli, and S. Reitzenstein, Quantum dots for photonic quantum information technology, Adv. Opt. Photon.15, 613 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    Shkarin and S

    A. Shkarin and S. G¨ otzinger, Organic molecules as single-photon sources, Applied Physics Reviews13, 021312 (2026)

    2026

  4. [12]

    Trebbia, P

    J.-B. Trebbia, P. Tamarat, and B. Lounis, Indistinguishable near-infrared single photons from an individual organic molecule, Physical Review A82, 063803 (2010)

    2010

  5. [13]

    Lombardi, M

    P. Lombardi, M. Colautti, R. Duquennoy, G. Murtaza, P. Majumder, and C. Toninelli, Triggered emission of indistinguish- able photons from an organic dye molecule, Appl. Phys. Lett.118, 204002 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Duquennoy, M

    R. Duquennoy, M. Colautti, R. Emadi, P. Majumder, P. Lombardi, and C. Toninelli, Real-time two-photon interference from distinct molecules on the same chip, Optica9, 731 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    D. Wang, H. Kelkar, D. Martin-Cano, D. Rattenbacher, A. Shkarin, T. Utikal, S. G¨ otzinger, and V. Sandoghdar, Turning a molecule into a coherent two-level quantum system, Nature Physics15, 483 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    C. M. Lange, A. D. Keni, I. Agarwal, E. Daggett, A. S. Mansukhani, A. Kundu, B. Cerjan, L. Huang, and J. D. Hood, A hybrid molecular–nanophotonic platform for on-chip cavity quantum electrodynamics and collective interactions, ACS Nano 10.1021/acsnano.5c19465 (2026)

    2026 doi

  9. [17]

    Huang, M

    T. Huang, M. Xu, W. Jin, W. Liu, Y. Chi, J. Tang, P. Ren, S. Wei, Z. Bai, Y. Shi, and X.-W. Chen, On-chip quantum inter- ference of indistinguishable single photons from integrated independent molecules, Nature Nanotechnology 10.1038/s41565- 025-02043-7 (2025)

    2025 doi

  10. [18]

    Boissier, R

    S. Boissier, R. C. Schofield, L. Jin, A. Ovvyan, S. Nur, F. H. L. Koppens, C. Toninelli, W. H. P. Pernice, K. D. Major, E. A. Hinds, and A. S. Clark, Coherent characterisation of a single molecule in a photonic black box, Nature Communications 12, 706 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Fournier, J

    C. Fournier, J. D¨ ureth, E. Fanella, H. Levy-Falk, M. Colautti, A. Beauvironnet, G. Dekyndt, C. Hainaut, T. Neuman, S. Betzold, S. H¨ ofling, S. Klembt, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, C. Toninelli, and A. Amo, Lattice quantum electrodynamics of a molecular emitter in a topological gap...

    2026 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Colautti, F

    M. Colautti, F. S. Piccioli, Z. Ristanovi´ c, P. Lombardi, A. Moradi, S. Adhikari, I. Deperasinska, B. Kozankiewicz, M. Orrit, and C. Toninelli, Laser-induced frequency tuning of fourier-limited single-molecule emitters, ACS Nano14, 13584 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Pazzagli, P

    S. Pazzagli, P. Lombardi, D. Martella, M. Colautti, B. Tiribilli, F. S. Cataliotti, and C. Toninelli, Self-Assembled Nanocrys- tals of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Show Photostable Single-Photon Emission, ACS Nano12, 4295 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Musavinezhad, J

    M. Musavinezhad, J. Renger, J. Zirkelbach, T. Utikal, C. U. Hail, T. Basch´ e, D. Poulikakos, S. G¨ otzinger, and V. San- doghdar, High-resolution cryogenic spectroscopy of single molecules in nanoprinted crystals, ACS Nano18, 21886 (2024), https://pubs.acs.org/ancac3/article-...

    2024

  15. [23]

    B. R. Mollow, Power spectrum of light scattered by two-level systems, Phys. Rev.188, 1969 (1969)

    1969

  16. [24]

    H. J. Kimble and L. Mandel, Theory of resonance fluorescence, Phys. Rev. A13, 2123 (1976)

    1976

  17. [25]

    Wrigge, I

    G. Wrigge, I. Gerhardt, J. Hwang, G. Zumofen, and V. Sandoghdar, Efficient coupling of photons to a single molecule and the observation of its resonance fluorescence, Nature Physics4, 60 (2008)

    2008

  18. [26]

    Hwang, M

    J. Hwang, M. Pototschnig, R. Lettow, G. Zumofen, A. Renn, S. G¨ otzinger, and V. Sandoghdar, A single-molecule optical transistor, Nature460, 76 (2009)

    2009

  19. [27]

    Maser, B

    A. Maser, B. Gmeiner, T. Utikal, S. G¨ otzinger, and V. Sandoghdar, Few-photon coherent nonlinear optics with a single 34 molecule, Nature Photonics10, 450 (2016)

    2016

  20. [28]

    Zirkelbach, B

    J. Zirkelbach, B. Gurlek, M. Mirzaei, A. Shkarin, T. Utikal, S. G¨ otzinger, and V. Sandoghdar, Spectral splitting of a stimulated Raman transition in a single molecule, Physical Review Research5, 043244 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    De Bernardis, H

    D. De Bernardis, H. Levy-Falk, E. Fanella, R. Duquennoy, V. Digiorgio, G. Scalari, M. Colautti, and C. Toninelli, Hybrid interfaces at the single quantum level in fluorescent molecules, Quantum Science and Technology10, 045051 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Roelli, D

    P. Roelli, D. Martin-Cano, T. J. Kippenberg, and C. Galland, Molecular Platform for Frequency Upconversion at the Single-Photon Level, Phys. Rev. X10, 031057 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    W. Chen, P. Roelli, H. Hu, S. Verlekar, S. P. Amirtharaj, A. I. Barreda, T. J. Kippenberg, M. Kovylina, E. Verhagen, A. Mart ´ ınez, and C. Galland, Continuous-wave frequency upconversion with a molecular optomechanical nanocavity, Science374, 1264 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Xomalis, X

    A. Xomalis, X. Zheng, R. Chikkaraddy, Z. Koczor-Benda, E. Miele, E. Rosta, G. A. E. Vandenbosch, A. Mart ´ ınez, and J. J. Baumberg, Detecting mid-infrared light by molecular frequency upconversion in dual-wavelength nanoantennas, Science 374, 1268 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    Esteso, R

    V. Esteso, R. Duquennoy, R. Ng, M. Colautti, P. Lombardi, G. Arregui, E. Chavez-Angel, C. Sotomayor-Torres, P. Garcia, M. Hilke, and C. Toninelli, Quantum thermometry with single molecules in nanoprobes, PRX Quantum4, 040314 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Moradi, Z

    A. Moradi, Z. Ristanovi´ c, M. Orrit, I. Deperasi´ nska, and B. Kozankiewicz, Matrix-induced Linear Stark Effect of Single Dibenzoterrylene Molecules in 2,3-Dibromonaphthalene Crystal, ChemPhysChem20, 55 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Ciancico, I

    C. Ciancico, I. Torre, B. Terr´ es, A. Moreno, R. Smit, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Orrit, F. Koppens, and A. Reserbat- Plantey, Optical detection of charge defects near a graphene transistor using the stark shift of fluorescent molecules, APL Quantum2, 036101 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    See Supplemental Material for extended derivations, methods, and additional experimental data

  29. [37]

    Loudon,The quantum theory of light, 3rd ed

    R. Loudon,The quantum theory of light, 3rd ed. (Oxford University Press, 2000)

    2000

  30. [38]

    Clear, R

    C. Clear, R. C. Schofield, K. D. Major, J. Iles-Smith, A. S. Clark, and D. P. S. McCutcheon, Phonon-Induced Optical Dephasing in Single Organic Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 153602 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Z. S. Sadeq, R. A. Muniz, and J. E. Sipe, One- and two-photon absorption spectra of dibenzoterrylene, Phys. Rev. Materials 2, 075202 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    Duquennoy, S

    R. Duquennoy, S. Landrieux, D. De Bernardis, J. Mony, M. Colautti, L. Jin, W. H. Pernice, and C. Toninelli, Enhanced control of single-molecule emission frequency and spectral diffusion, ACS Nano18, 32508 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    C. M. Lange, E. Daggett, V. Walther, L. Huang, and J. D. Hood, Superradiant and subradiant states in lifetime-limited organic molecules through laser-induced tuning, Nature Physics , 1 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    J. M. Binder, A. Stark, N. Tomek, J. Scheuer, F. Frank, K. D. Jahnke, C. M¨ uller, S. Schmitt, M. H. Metsch, T. Unden, T. Gehring, A. Huck, U. L. Andersen, L. J. Rogers, and F. Jelezko, Qudi: A modular python suite for experiment control and data processing, SoftwareX6, 85 (2017)

    2017

  35. [43]

    Bezanson, A

    J. Bezanson, A. Edelman, S. Karpinski, and V. B. Shah, Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing, SIAM Review 59, 65 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    Datseris, J

    G. Datseris, J. Isensee, S. Pech, and T. G´ al, Drwatson: the perfect sidekick for your scientific inquiries, Journal of Open Source Software5, 2673 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    Bouchet-Valat and B

    M. Bouchet-Valat and B. Kami´ nski, Dataframes.jl : Flexible and fast tabular data in julia, Journal of Statistical Software 107, 10.18637/jss.v107.i04 (2023)

    2023 doi

  38. [46]

    Danisch and J

    S. Danisch and J. Krumbiegel, Makie.jl: Flexible high-performance data visualization for julia, Journal of Open Source Software6, 3349 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Lambert, E

    N. Lambert, E. Gigu` ere, P. Menczel, B. Li, P. Hopf, G. Su´ arez, M. Gali, J. Lishman, R. Gadhvi, R. Agarwal, A. Galicia, N. Shammah, P. Nation, J. Johansson, S. Ahmed, S. Cross, A. Pitchford, and F. Nori, Qutip 5: The quantum toolbox in python, Physics Reports1153, 1 (2026)

    2026

  40. [48]

    T. E. Fjelde, K. Xu, D. Widmann, M. Tarek, C. Pfiffer, M. Trapp, S. D. Axen, X. Sun, M. Hauru, P. Yong, W. Tebbutt, Z. Ghahramani, and H. Ge, Turing.jl: a general-purpose probabilistic programming language, ACM Trans. Probab. Mach. Learn. 10.1145/3711897 (2025), just Accepted

    2025 doi

  41. [49]

    H. Ge, K. Xu, and Z. Ghahramani, Turing: A language for flexible probabilistic inference, inProceedings of the Twenty- First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 84, edited by A. Storkey and F. Perez...

    2018

  42. [50]

    Mirzaei, A

    M. Mirzaei, A. Shkarin, B. Gurlek, J. Zirkelbach, A. J. Shin, I. Deperasi´ nska, B. Kozankiewicz, T. Utikal, S. G¨ otzinger, and V. Sandoghdar, Nano–electron volt fourier-limited transition of a single surface-adsorbed molecule, Science392, 1384 (2026), https://www.science.org...

    2026 doi

  43. [51]

    Zhang, M

    Q. Zhang, M. Asjad, M. Reitz, C. Sommer, B. Gurlek, and C. Genes, Nonlinear optovibronics in molecular systems, Physical Review A109, 023714 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller,Quantum Noise, 2nd ed., edited by H. Haken (Springer, 2000)

    2000

  45. [53]

    H. P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The theory of open quantum systems(Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, 2002)

    2002

  46. [54]

    Reiter and A

    F. Reiter and A. S. Sørensen, Effective operator formalism for open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A85, 032111 (2012)

    2012

  47. [55]

    Grandi, K

    S. Grandi, K. D. Major, C. Polisseni, S. Boissier, A. S. Clark, and E. A. Hinds, Quantum dynamics of a driven two-level molecule with variable dephasing, Physical Review A94, 10.1103/physreva.94.063839 (2016)

    2016 doi

  48. [56]

    Bernard, L

    J. Bernard, L. Fleury, H. Talon, and M. Orrit, Photon bunching in the fluorescence from single molecules: A probe for intersystem crossing, The Journal of Chemical Physics98, 850 (1993)

    1993

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.