Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Dissipationless dynamics of spin supersolid states in a spin-1/2 triangular antiferromagnet with impurities

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that gapless Goldstone modes in spin supersolids survive magnetic impurities, while the same impurities split magnon bands in the conventional up-up-down state, providing a spectroscopic fingerprint of dissipationless spin

desk verdict Solid DMRG result with a genuinely new impurity-robust Goldstone-mode prediction, but the 'robust against impurities' claim is only shown for one specially pinned configuration and needs a random-realization check. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.03489 v3 pith:3YOP23JM submitted 2025-09-03 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Yixuan Huang , Yuan Gao , Wei Li , Seiji Yunoki , Sadamichi Maekawa This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords spinsupersolidtriangularlatticeantiferromagnetGoldstonemodesuperfluidityimpuritiesdynamicalstructurefactorsuperfluidstiffnessup-up-downstate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether spin supersolids, which simultaneously break lattice and spin-rotation symmetry, can be distinguished from ordinary magnetic order by how they respond to impurities. Using tensor-network simulations of the easy-axis triangular-lattice Heisenberg model in a magnetic field, it finds that the gapless Goldstone mode at the K points survives a 1.85% density of weakened bonds in both the low-field 'Y' and high-field 'V' supersolid phases, while the same impurities split the magnon bands in the up-up-down state. It also computes a finite superfluid stiffness from a twisted boundary condition that persists up to T/J≈0.1. The authors argue that this impurity fingerprint gives neutron-scattering experiments a direct way to observe dissipationless spin dynamics.

What carries the argument

The central probe is the transverse dynamical spin structure factor χ(q,ω), computed on cylindrical lattices using the time-dependent variational principle with bond dimensions up to 2200. Impurities are modeled by reducing the exchange coupling on 1.85% of bonds to λ=0.95 J, all placed on one sublattice to pin the magnetic structure. The gapless mode at the K points is the direct manifestation of the broken U(1) symmetry, and linear spin-wave theory supplies the comparison magnon dispersions. The superfluid stiffness is extracted from the free-energy difference between π-twisted and untwisted boundary conditions, ΔF(π).

What would settle it

Measure the low-energy inelastic neutron scattering spectrum of a triangular-lattice spin-supersolid candidate, such as Na2BaCo(PO4)2, with roughly 2% nonmagnetic element substitution. If the gapless Goldstone mode at the K points becomes gapped or splits in the field windows where the supersolid exists, the central claim is wrong. Alternatively, a numerical simulation with impurities randomly placed on all three sublattices that produces K-point splitting in the Y or V phase would disprove the generality of the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms: in the spin-1/2 easy-axis triangular antiferromagnet in a magnetic field, the two spin supersolid phases exhibit a gapless Goldstone mode at the K points, tied to spontaneous U(1) symmetry breaking and hence to spin superfluidity. The central numerical result is that this mode remains gapless when 1.85% of exchange bonds are weakened to mimic magnetic impurities, whereas the conventional up-up-down state shows impurity-induced splitting of its magnon bands. The paper takes this contrast to be direct evidence for dissipationless spin dynamics, and it supports the interpretation by showing that the superfluid stiffness, probed by the free-energy difference between π-t

Load-bearing premise

The weakened-bond impurity model (1.85% of sites, all on one sublattice, λ=0.95) is assumed to represent real chemical substitution without breaking the U(1) symmetry or creating domain walls; if actual impurities break the symmetry or destabilize the supersolid order, the claimed robustness may not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Inelastic neutron scattering on element-substituted samples can discriminate a spin supersolid from an up-up-down state by checking whether the K-point Goldstone mode stays gapless.
  • The finite superfluid stiffness up to T/J≈0.1 suggests that dissipationless spin transport may be observable at accessible temperatures, consistent with spin Seebeck-effect calculations.
  • The contrast between impurity-robust Goldstone modes in supersolids and impurity-induced band splitting in the up-up-down state gives a generic spectroscopic test for spin superfluidity.
  • The result extends beyond Na2BaCo(PO4)2 to other triangular-lattice spin supersolid candidates, such as K2Co(SeO3)2 and Na2BaNi(PO4)2, as long as the gapless Goldstone mode can be observed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the authors place all impurities on one sublattice to avoid domain walls; a random impurity distribution on all three sublattices might reduce longitudinal order but could still preserve the superfluid mode, so testing random placements numerically would clarify how robust the fingerprint is.
  • Beyond the paper: the disappearance of the pseudo-Goldstone mode in the V state upon doping suggests impurities lift the three-fold diagonal-order degeneracy, offering a way to probe order-by-quantum-disorder.
  • Beyond the paper: because the Goldstone mode is tied to superfluid density, the impurity robustness implies that the spectral weight of the mode may be a more reliable indicator of superfluidity than static order parameters in disordered samples.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the spin-1/2 easy-axis triangular-lattice Heisenberg model at parameters relevant to Na2BaCo(PO4)2, using DMRG, TDVP, and thermal tensor-network simulations on finite cylinders. It reports a finite superfluid stiffness in the low- and high-field spin supersolid (Y and V) states, as estimated from a π-boundary-twist free-energy difference, and it compares the dynamical spin structure factor with and without 1.85% magnetic impurities modeled by weakened bonds (λ=0.95). The central claim is that the gapless Goldstone mode at the K points remains robust in both supersolid states, whereas the same impurity density splits the magnon bands in the up-up-down (UUD) state. The authors argue that this impurity response provides a spectroscopic fingerprint of dissipationless spin-superfluid dynamics accessible to inelastic neutron scattering.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper offers a concrete and falsifiable experimental prediction: in the supersolid phases, dilute U(1)-preserving substitution should leave the K-point Goldstone mode gapless, while in the UUD phase the same doping should split the magnon bands. The numerics are state-of-the-art (large bond dimensions, U(1)-symmetric tensor networks, direct time evolution), and the key spectral comparison is directly visible in Figs. 3 and 4. The model parameters are taken from prior experimental fits rather than adjusted to the conclusion, and the authors are candid in the Supplemental Material about finite-size limitations and excluded configurations. The main weakness is that the generic claim about 'impurities' rests on a single, specially ordered impurity configuration, and the 'superfluid stiffness' is measured via a finite π twist rather than the θ→0 limit; these issues are load-bearing for the experimental message but appear addressable.

major comments (3)
  1. [Supplemental Material §II and §IV (Fig. S6)] The central claim—that the K-point Goldstone mode is robust 'against impurities'—is demonstrated for one ordered impurity configuration only. SM §II states that impurities are placed on the same sublattice 'where the same magnetic structure in z direction is pinned,' and SM §IV's Fig. S6 caption explicitly discards data where impurities 'cause a domain wall in the magnetic structure in z direction.' Real element substitution produces random positions across all sublattices, which can create domain walls or reduce the diagonal order. To support the abstract's experimental prediction, the authors should either provide an ensemble of random impurity realizations at the same density or explicitly restrict the claim to impurities that preserve the z-order. As written, the generalization from the simulated configuration to 'impurities' generically is not established.
  2. [Eq. (3), Fig. 2, SM §IV] The superfluid stiffness is defined through the θ→0 curvature of F(θ), but all reported values are ΔF(π)=F(π)−F(0). The text calls this an approximation, and SM §IV concedes that finite-size scaling is incomplete ('future study on larger systems may be needed to determine ΔE0(π) in the thermodynamic limit'). Since a finite superfluid stiffness is used to support the dissipationless-dynamics interpretation, the proportionality between ΔF(π) and ρ_s should be checked—e.g., by computing small-θ curvatures on the largest accessible cylinder or by providing a scaling argument. Without this, the quantitative claim of finite superfluid stiffness is not fully established.
  3. [Figs. 3(d)–(f), 4(d)–(f), SM §III] The impurity-induced band splitting in the UUD state is shown for one impurity pattern at 1.85% and for one single-impurity case (Fig. S5). A localized impurity necessarily breaks translational symmetry and can split near-degenerate bands; the interesting claim is that the splitting is a generic property of UUD and is absent in supersolids. A small set of random realizations, or at least a symmetry-based argument that the result is independent of the impurity position, is needed to rule out a configuration-specific accident.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Main text after Fig. 3] The sentence 'the spin supersolid state retains [73]' is grammatically incomplete; presumably 'retains superfluidity' or 'retains the superfluid response' is intended.
  2. [SM §IV] The notation 'L_y × L_x = 48×6' conflicts with the L_x × L_y convention used throughout the main text; please make the notation consistent.
  3. [Fig. 2(c)] The vertical axis is labeled implicitly as superfluid stiffness, but the plotted quantity is ΔF(π). Please label the axis with the computed quantity and state the conversion to ρ_s explicitly.
  4. [Eq. (3)] The line combines a definition (lim θ→0 ∂²F/∂θ²) with an approximation (∝ ΔF(π)) in one expression. Splitting the definition from the numerical proxy would improve clarity.
  5. [SM Fig. S6 caption] Typo: 'impurites' should be 'impurities', and 'A few data ... is ignored' should be 'are ignored'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Central spectra and stiffness are direct numerical outputs; the only caveat is a disclosed order-pinned impurity layout, a scope limitation rather than circularity.

full rationale

The paper's central results—the robust Goldstone mode at K points and the UUD band splitting—are direct DMRG/TDVP outputs for the stated Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) with weakened-bond impurities (Eq. 2). The parameter Δz/J = 1.68 is taken from an earlier experimental fit (Ref. [32]) and is not tuned to the target spectra; the superfluid stiffness and dynamical structure factor are computed independently and found mutually consistent, which is evidence, not circularity. The one notable limitation is disclosed in the Supplemental Material: impurities are placed on the same sublattice that pins the z-magnetic structure (SM §II), and configurations that create domain walls in the z-magnetic structure are explicitly ignored (SM §IV, Fig. S6). This means the abstract's sweeping phrase 'robust against impurities' is demonstrated only for order-pinning impurity configurations, not for generic random substitution. However, this is an openly stated modeling choice and a scope restriction, not an equation-level reduction of the conclusion to the input. The self-citations (Refs. [32, 41, 55]) supply model parameters and prior context; the impurity-response calculation itself is new and computed from the model, so no load-bearing circular chain is present. Score 2 reflects the minor self-referential context and the order-pinned caveat, while the core derivation remains self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a specific model Hamiltonian with anisotropy fitted to experiment, an idealized impurity representation, and a finite-twist estimator for superfluid stiffness. No new particles or forces are introduced. The robustness of the Goldstone mode is a numerical observation supported by symmetry arguments, but it depends on the retained U(1) symmetry and the chosen impurity configuration.

free parameters (3)
  • Delta_z / J = 1.68
    Easy-axis anisotropy taken from Ref. [32], fitted to magnetic specific heat and susceptibility of Na2BaCo(PO4)2. The phase diagram and spectra are sensitive to this value.
  • Impurity coupling lambda = 0.95
    Chosen for numerical stability; authors state results are nearly unchanged for lambda > 0.9. It represents a nearly vacancy-like impurity.
  • Impurity density = 1.85% (4 sites in bulk of 216-site summation)
    Chosen as experimentally accessible via element substitution. The central comparison between supersolid and UUD phases uses this density, and the qualitative result may depend on it.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The easy-axis XXZ Hamiltonian with Delta_z/J = 1.68 is an adequate model for Na2BaCo(PO4)2.
    Motivated by previous experimental and numerical phase diagram matching (Ref. [32]); the central claim is made for this specific model.
  • ad hoc to paper Magnetic impurities are represented by weakened bonds with lambda = 0.95 (Eq. 2).
    Simplifies element substitution; not derived from a microscopic impurity potential.
  • domain assumption The impurity Hamiltonian preserves the U(1) spin rotation symmetry about the z-axis.
    The impurity term only weakens the Heisenberg exchange, so U(1) symmetry is retained. This symmetry protection underlies the robustness of the Goldstone mode.
  • domain assumption Finite-width cylinder results (Ly = 6, and Ly = 9 for some checks) represent the thermodynamic limit for the spectral features.
    Authors show size dependence of order parameters and stiffness, but the impurity spectra are only shown for Ly = 6; scaling to 2D is not established.
  • ad hoc to paper Delta F(pi) is proportional to the superfluid stiffness rho_s.
    Eq. (3) uses a pi-twist instead of the theta to 0 limit, implicitly assuming a quadratic free-energy dependence on theta that is not verified for this model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dissipationless dynamics of spin supersolid states in a spin-1/2 triangular antiferromagnet with impurities." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3YOP23JM

@misc{pith2026250903489,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dissipationless dynamics of spin supersolid states in a spin-1/2 triangular antiferromagnet with impurities},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3YOP23JM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03489}
}
abstract

Motivated by recent experimental evidence for spin supersolid states in triangular-lattice compounds, we numerically investigate the dynamical properties of magnetic field-induced phases in the spin-1/2 easy-axis triangular antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model in the presence of magnetic impurities. In both weak- and strong-field spin supersolid states, the gapless Goldstone mode at the $K$ points remains robust against impurities, which is a direct manifestation of spin superfluidity. By contrast, at the same impurity density, impurities induce a splitting of the magnon bands in the conventional magnetic state, the so-called up-up-down state. In addition, the finite superfluid stiffness probed by the twisted phase in the spin supersolid states is consistent with the excitation spectrum. We argue that the excitation spectrum with impurities provides direct spectroscopic evidence for dissipationless spin dynamics in the spin supersolid states, which is experimentally accessible via inelastic neutron scattering.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.03489 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Panel (a) shows the triangular lattice with blue solid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Panels (a) and (b) show the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The dynamical structure factor near [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The dynamical structure factor near [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Emergent Spin Supersolids in Frustrated Quantum Materials

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    Spin supersolids featuring coexisting longitudinal spin order breaking lattice symmetry and transverse order breaking spin U(1) symmetry have been established in frustrated quantum magnets through consistent experimen...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A. J. Leggett, Can a solid be ”superfluid”?, Physical Re- view Letters25, 1543 (1970)

    1970

  2. [2]

    Chester, Speculations on Bose-Einstein condensation and quantum crystals, Physical Review A2, 256 (1970)

    G. Chester, Speculations on Bose-Einstein condensation and quantum crystals, Physical Review A2, 256 (1970)

    1970

  3. [3]

    Kim and M

    E. Kim and M. H.-W. Chan, Probable observation of a supersolid helium phase, Nature427, 225 (2004)

    2004

  4. [4]

    Balibar, The enigma of supersolidity, Nature464, 176 (2010)

    S. Balibar, The enigma of supersolidity, Nature464, 176 (2010)

    2010

  5. [5]

    M. H.-W. Chan, R. Hallock, and L. Reatto, Overview on solid 4He and the issue of supersolidity, Journal of Low Temperature Physics172, 317 (2013)

    2013

  6. [6]

    Tanzi, E

    L. Tanzi, E. Lucioni, F. Fam` a, J. Catani, A. Fioretti, C. Gabbanini, R. N. Bisset, L. Santos, and G. Modugno, Observation of a dipolar quantum gas with metastable supersolid properties, Physical Review Letters122, 130405 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    B¨ ottcher, J.-N

    F. B¨ ottcher, J.-N. Schmidt, M. Wenzel, J. Hertkorn, M. Guo, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, Transient supersolid properties in an array of dipolar quantum droplets, Phys- ical Review X9, 011051 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    Chomaz, D

    L. Chomaz, D. Petter, P. Ilzh¨ ofer, G. Natale, A. Traut- mann, C. Politi, G. Durastante, R. Van Bijnen, A. Patscheider, M. Sohmen,et al., Long-lived and tran- sient supersolid behaviors in dipolar quantum gases, Physical Review X9, 021012 (2019)

    2019

Show all 93 references
  1. [9]

    M. Guo, F. B¨ ottcher, J. Hertkorn, J.-N. Schmidt, M. Wenzel, H. P. B¨ uchler, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, The low-energy goldstone mode in a trapped dipolar super- solid, Nature574, 386 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Tanzi, S

    L. Tanzi, S. Roccuzzo, E. Lucioni, F. Fam` a, A. Fioretti, C. Gabbanini, G. Modugno, A. Recati, and S. Stringari, Supersolid symmetry breaking from compressional oscil- lations in a dipolar quantum gas, Nature574, 382 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Natale, R

    G. Natale, R. van Bijnen, A. Patscheider, D. Petter, M. J. Mark, L. Chomaz, and F. Ferlaino, Excitation spectrum of a trapped dipolar supersolid and its experimental evi- dence, Physical Review Letters123, 050402 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Tanzi, J

    L. Tanzi, J. Maloberti, G. Biagioni, A. Fioretti, C. Gab- banini, and G. Modugno, Evidence of superfluidity in a dipolar supersolid from nonclassical rotational inertia, Science371, 1162 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    M. A. Norcia, E. Poli, C. Politi, L. Klaus, T. Bland, M. J. Mark, L. Santos, R. N. Bisset, and F. Ferlaino, Can angular oscillations probe superfluidity in dipolar super- solids?, Physical Review Letters129, 040403 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    Recati and S

    A. Recati and S. Stringari, Supersolidity in ultracold dipolar gases, Nature Reviews Physics5, 735 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    ˇSindik, T

    M. ˇSindik, T. Zawi´ slak, A. Recati, and S. Stringari, Sound, superfluidity, and layer compressibility in a ring dipolar supersolid, Physical Review Letters132, 146001 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Bougas, T

    G. Bougas, T. Bland, H. Sadeghpour, and S. Mistakidis, Signatures of rigidity and second sound in dipolar super- solids, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.22290 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Wessel and M

    S. Wessel and M. Troyer, Supersolid hard-core bosons on the triangular lattice, Physical Review Letters95, 127205 (2005)

    2005

  10. [18]

    Heidarian and K

    D. Heidarian and K. Damle, Persistent supersolid phase of hard-core bosons on the triangular lattice, Physical Review Letters95, 127206 (2005)

    2005

  11. [19]

    Melko, A

    R. Melko, A. Paramekanti, A. Burkov, A. Vishwanath, D. Sheng, and L. Balents, Supersolid order from disor- der: Hard-core bosons on the triangular lattice, Physical Review Letters95, 127207 (2005)

    2005

  12. [20]

    Burkov and L

    A. Burkov and L. Balents, Superfluid-insulator tran- sitions on the triangular lattice, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics72, 134502 (2005)

    2005

  13. [21]

    Boninsegni and N

    M. Boninsegni and N. Prokof’ev, Supersolid phase of hard-core bosons on a triangular lattice, Physical Review Letters95, 237204 (2005)

    2005

  14. [22]

    R. G. Melko, A. Del Maestro, and A. Burkov, Striped supersolid phase and the search for deconfined quantum criticality in hard-core bosons on the triangular lattice, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics74, 214517 (2006)

    2006

  15. [23]

    Gan, Y.-C

    J.-Y. Gan, Y.-C. Wen, and Y. Yu, Supersolidity and phase diagram of soft-core bosons on a triangular lat- tice, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Mate- rials Physics75, 094501 (2007)

    2007

  16. [24]

    A. Sen, P. Dutt, K. Damle, and R. Moessner, Variational wave-function study of the triangular lattice supersolid, Physical Review Letters100, 147204 (2008)

    2008

  17. [25]

    F. Wang, F. Pollmann, and A. Vishwanath, Extended supersolid phase of frustrated hard-core bosons on a triangular lattice, Physical Review Letters102, 017203 (2009)

    2009

  18. [26]

    Jiang, M

    H. Jiang, M. Weng, Z. Weng, D. Sheng, and L. Balents, Supersolid order of frustrated hard-core bosons in a tri- angular lattice system, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics79, 020409 (2009)

    2009

  19. [27]

    Zhang, R

    X.-F. Zhang, R. Dillenschneider, Y. Yu, and S. Eggert, Supersolid phase transitions for hard-core bosons on a triangular lattice, Physical Review B—Condensed Mat- ter and Materials Physics84, 174515 (2011). 6

    2011

  20. [28]

    Jiang, L

    H.-C. Jiang, L. Fu, and C. Xu, Pair superfluid and su- persolid of correlated hard-core bosons on a triangular lattice, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Ma- terials Physics86, 045129 (2012)

    2012

  21. [29]

    Yamamoto, G

    D. Yamamoto, G. Marmorini, and I. Danshita, Quantum phase diagram of the triangular-lattice XXZ model in a magnetic field, Physical Review Letters112, 127203 (2014)

    2014

  22. [30]

    Sellmann, X.-F

    D. Sellmann, X.-F. Zhang, and S. Eggert, Phase diagram of the antiferromagnetic XXZ model on the triangular lattice, Physical Review B91, 081104 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    R. Chi, J. Hu, H.-J. Liao, and T. Xiang, Dynamical spec- tra of spin supersolid states in triangular antiferromag- nets, Physical Review B110, L180404 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Gao, Y.-C

    Y. Gao, Y.-C. Fan, H. Li, F. Yang, X.-T. Zeng, X.-L. Sheng, R. Zhong, Y. Qi, Y. Wan, and W. Li, Spin su- persolidity in nearly ideal easy-axis triangular quantum antiferromagnet Na2BaCo(PO4)2, npj Quantum Materi- als7, 89 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    Zhong, S

    R. Zhong, S. Guo, G. Xu, Z. Xu, and R. J. Cava, Strong quantum fluctuations in a quantum spin liquid candidate with a Co-based triangular lattice, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116, 14505 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    N. Li, Q. Huang, X. Yue, W. Chu, Q. Chen, E. Choi, X. Zhao, H. Zhou, and X. Sun, Possible itiner- ant excitations and quantum spin state transitions in the effective spin-1/2 triangular-lattice antiferromag- net Na 2BaCo(PO4)2, Nature Communications11, 4216 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    S. Lee, C. Lee, A. Berlie, A. Hillier, D. T. Adroja, R. Zhong, R. Cava, Z. Jang, and K.-Y. Choi, Temporal and field evolution of spin excitations in the disorder- free triangular antiferromagnet Na 2BaCo(PO4)2, Physi- cal Review B103, 024413 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Wellm, W

    C. Wellm, W. Roscher, J. Zeisner, A. Alfonsov, R. Zhong, R. J. Cava, A. Savoyant, R. Hayn, J. van den Brink, B. B¨ uchner,et al., Frustration enhanced by Kitaev ex- change in a ˜jef f= 1 2 triangular antiferromagnet, Physical Review B104, L100420 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    Huang, D

    Y. Huang, D. Dai, C. Zhao, J. Ni, L. Wang, B. Pan, B. Gao, P. Dai, and S. Li, Thermal conductivity of triangular-lattice antiferromagnet Na 2BaCo(PO4)2: ab- sence of itinerant fermionic excitations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.08866 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    X.-Y. Liu, Y. Gao, H. Li, W. Jin, J. Xiang, H. Jin, Z. Chen, W. Li, and G. Su, Quantum spin liquid candi- date as superior refrigerant in cascade demagnetization cooling, Communications Physics5, 233 (2022)

    2022

  31. [39]

    Sheng, L

    J. Sheng, L. Wang, A. Candini, W. Jiang, L. Huang, B. Xi, J. Zhao, H. Ge, N. Zhao, Y. Fu,et al., Two-dimensional quantum universality in the spin- 1/2 triangular-lattice quantum antiferromagnet Na2BaCo(PO4)2, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119, e2211193119 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Xiang, C

    J. Xiang, C. Zhang, Y. Gao, W. Schmidt, K. Schmalzl, C.-W. Wang, B. Li, N. Xi, X.-Y. Liu, H. Jin,et al., Giant magnetocaloric effect in spin supersolid candidate Na2BaCo(PO4)2, Nature625, 270 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Y. Gao, C. Zhang, J. Xiang, D. Yu, X. Lu, P. Sun, W. Jin, G. Su, and W. Li, Double magnon-roton excitations in the triangular-lattice spin supersolid, Physical Review B 110, 214408 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Zhang, Y

    D. Zhang, Y. Zhu, G. Zheng, K.-W. Chen, Q. Huang, L. Zhou, Y. Liu, K. Jenkins, A. Chan, H. Zhou, et al., Field tunable BKT and quantum phase tran- sitions in spin-1/2 triangular lattice antiferromagnet, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04755 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Hussain, J

    G. Hussain, J. Zhang, M. Zhang, L. Yadav, Y. Ding, C. Zheng, S. Haravifard, and X. Wang, Experimental evi- dence of crystal-field, Zeeman-splitting, and spin-phonon excitations in the quantum supersolid Na 2BaCo(PO4)2, Physical Review B111, 155129 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    Popescu, N

    T. Popescu, N. Gora, F. Demmel, Z. Xu, R. Zhong, T. Williams, R. Cava, G. Xu, and C. Stock, Zee- man split Kramers doublets in spin-supersolid candidate Na2BaCo(PO4)2, Physical Review Letters134, 136703 (2025)

    2025

  37. [45]

    X. Xu, Z. Wu, Y. Chen, Q. Huang, Z. Hu, X. Shi, K. Du, S. Li, R. Bian, R. Yu,et al., NMR study of supersolid phases in the triangular-lattice antiferromag- net Na 2BaCo(PO4)2, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.08570 (2025)

    2025

  38. [46]

    Woodland, R

    L. Woodland, R. Okuma, J. R. Stewart, C. Balz, and R. Coldea, From continuum excitations to sharp magnons via transverse magnetic field in the spin-1/2 Ising-like tri- angular lattice antiferromagnet Na 2BaCo(PO4)2, Physi- cal Review B112, 104413 (2025)

    2025

  39. [47]

    Sheng, L

    J. Sheng, L. Wang, W. Jiang, H. Ge, N. Zhao, T. Li, M. Kofu, D. Yu, W. Zhu, J.-W. Mei,et al., Continuum of spin excitations in an ordered magnet, The Innovation (2025)

    2025

  40. [48]

    Xiang, E

    J. Xiang, E. Lv, Q. Shen, C. Su, X. He, Y. Zhu, Y. Gao, X.-Y. Liu, D.-W. Qu, X. Wang, X. Chen, Q. Zhao, H. Li, S. Li, J. Yang, J. Luo, P. Sun, W. Jin, Y. Qi, R. Zhou, W. Li, and G. Su, Universal magnetocaloric effect near quantum critical point of magnon bose-einstein conden- ...

    2025 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Drescher, L

    M. Drescher, L. Vanderstraeten, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Dynamical signatures of symmetry-broken and liquid phases in an S= 1 2 heisenberg antiferromag- net on the triangular lattice, Physical Review B108, L220401 (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    Drescher, L

    M. Drescher, L. Vanderstraeten, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Spectral functions of an extended antifer- romagneticS= 1/2 Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice (2025), arXiv:2508.17292 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  43. [51]

    H. Jia, B. Ma, Z. Wang, and G. Chen, Quantum spin supersolid as a precursory Dirac spin liquid in a triangu- lar lattice antiferromagnet, Physical Review Research6, 033031 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    Takei and Y

    S. Takei and Y. Tserkovnyak, Superfluid spin trans- port through easy-plane ferromagnetic insulators, Phys- ical Review Letters112, 227201 (2014)

    2014

  45. [53]

    Qaiumzadeh, H

    A. Qaiumzadeh, H. Skarsv ˚ ag, C. Holmqvist, and A. Brataas, Spin superfluidity in biaxial antiferromag- netic insulators, Physical Review Letters118, 137201 (2017)

    2017

  46. [54]

    W. Yuan, Q. Zhu, T. Su, Y. Yao, W. Xing, Y. Chen, Y. Ma, X. Lin, J. Shi, R. Shindou,et al., Experimental signatures of spin superfluid ground state in canted anti- ferromagnet Cr 2O3 via nonlocal spin transport, Science Advances4, eaat1098 (2018)

    2018

  47. [55]

    Y. Gao, Y. Huang, S. Maekawa, and W. Li, Spin Seebeck effect of triangular-lattice spin supersolid, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.22414 (2025)

    2025

  48. [56]

    See Supplemental Material for more detailed results

  49. [57]

    S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Physical Review Letters69, 7 2863 (1992)

    1992

  50. [58]

    S. R. White, Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups, Physical Review B48, 10345 (1993)

    1993

  51. [59]

    Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of physics 326, 96 (2011)

    U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of physics 326, 96 (2011)

    2011

  52. [60]

    Haegeman, J

    J. Haegeman, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, I. Piˇ zorn, H. Ver- schelde, and F. Verstraete, Time-dependent variational principle for quantum lattices, Physical Review letters 107, 070601 (2011)

    2011

  53. [61]

    Haegeman, C

    J. Haegeman, C. Lubich, I. Oseledets, B. Vandereycken, and F. Verstraete, Unifying time evolution and optimiza- tion with matrix product states, Physical Review B94, 165116 (2016)

    2016

  54. [62]

    Q. Li, Y. Gao, Y.-Y. He, Y. Qi, B.-B. Chen, and W. Li, Tangent space approach for thermal tensor network sim- ulations of the 2D Hubbard model, Physical Review Let- ters130, 226502 (2023)

    2023

  55. [63]

    Yang and S

    M. Yang and S. R. White, Time-dependent variational principle with ancillary Krylov subspace, Physical Re- view B102, 094315 (2020)

    2020

  56. [64]

    B.-B. Chen, L. Chen, Z. Chen, W. Li, and A. Weichsel- baum, Exponential thermal tensor network approach for quantum lattice models, Phys. Rev. X8, 031082 (2018)

    2018

  57. [65]

    Chen, Y.-J

    B.-B. Chen, Y.-J. Liu, Z. Chen, and W. Li, Series- expansion thermal tensor network approach for quantum lattice models, Phys. Rev. B95, 161104 (2017)

    2017

  58. [66]

    Gleis, J.-W

    A. Gleis, J.-W. Li, and J. von Delft, Controlled bond ex- pansion for density matrix renormalization group ground state search at single-site costs, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 246402 (2023)

    2023

  59. [67]

    J.-W. Li, A. Gleis, and J. von Delft, Time-dependent variational principle with controlled bond expansion for matrix product states, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 026401 (2024)

    2024

  60. [68]

    P. C. Canfield, New materials physics, Reports on Progress in Physics83, 016501 (2019)

    2019

  61. [69]

    Schmidt, A

    J. Schmidt, A. Sapkota, C. L. Mueller, S. Xiao, S. Huyan, T. J. Slade, R. Ribeiro, S.-W. Lee, S. Bud’ko, and P. Canfield, Tuning the structure and superconductivity of SrNi 2P2 by Rh substitution, Physical Review B111, 054102 (2025)

    2025

  62. [70]

    Karpinski, N

    J. Karpinski, N. D. Zhigadlo, S. Katrych, R. Puzniak, K. Rogacki, and R. Gonnelli, Single crystals of MgB 2: Synthesis, substitutions and properties, Physica C: Su- perconductivity456, 3 (2007)

    2007

  63. [71]

    Langmann, H

    J. Langmann, H. Kepenci, G. Eickerling, K. Batke, A. Jesche, M. Xu, P. Canfield, and W. Scherer, Experi- mental X-ray charge-density studies- a suitable probe for superconductivity? a case study on MgB 2, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A126, 8494 (2022)

    2022

  64. [72]

    Adriano, M

    C. Adriano, M. Xu, S. Huyan, K. R. Pakuszewski, A. P. Machado, B. Schrunk, S. L. Bud’ko, R. A. Ribeiro, P. C. Canfield, and A. Kaminski, Tuning the electronic prop- erties of MgB 2 by substitution with Mn and C, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter (2025)

    2025

  65. [73]

    Zhang, Y.-C

    X.-F. Zhang, Y.-C. Wen, and S. Eggert, Static impurities in a supersolid of interacting hard-core bosons on a tri- angular lattice, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics82, 220501 (2010)

    2010

  66. [74]

    Holstein and H

    T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field dependence of the in- trinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet, Physical Review58, 1098 (1940)

    1940

  67. [75]

    Ferrari and F

    F. Ferrari and F. Becca, Dynamical structure factor of the J 1-J2 heisenberg model on the triangular lattice: magnons, spinons, and gauge fields, Physical Review X 9, 031026 (2019)

    2019

  68. [76]

    R. Chi, Y. Liu, Y. Wan, H.-J. Liao, and T. Xiang, Spin excitation spectra of anisotropic spin-1/2 triangular lat- tice heisenberg antiferromagnets, Physical Review Let- ters129, 227201 (2022)

    2022

  69. [77]

    J. G. Rau, P. A. McClarty, and R. Moessner, Pseudo- goldstone gaps and order-by-quantum disorder in frus- trated magnets, Physical Review Letters121, 237201 (2018)

    2018

  70. [78]

    S. Ito, N. Kurita, H. Tanaka, S. Ohira-Kawamura, K. Nakajima, S. Itoh, K. Kuwahara, and K. Kaku- rai, Structure of the magnetic excitations in the spin-1/2 triangular-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet Ba3CoSb2O9, Nature Communications8, 235 (2017)

    2017

  71. [79]

    Zhong, S

    R. Zhong, S. Guo, and R. Cava, Frustrated magnetism in the layered triangular lattice materials K 2Co(SeO3)2 and Rb2Co(SeO3)2, Physical Review Materials4, 084406 (2020)

    2020

  72. [80]

    T. Chen, A. Ghasemi, J. Zhang, L. Shi, Z. Tagay, L. Chen, E.-S. Choi, M. Jaime, M. Lee, Y. Hao,et al., Phase diagram and spectroscopic evidence of supersolids in quantum ising magnet K 2Co(SeO3)2, arXiv e-prints , arXiv (2024)

    2024

  73. [81]

    M. Zhu, V. Romerio, N. Steiger, S. Nabi, N. Mu- rai, S. Ohira-Kawamura, K. Y. Povarov, Y. Skourski, R. Sibille, L. Keller,et al., Continuum excitations in a spin supersolid on a triangular lattice, Physical Review Letters133, 186704 (2024)

    2024

  74. [82]

    Y. Xu, J. Hasik, B. Ponsioen, and A. H. Nevidom- skyy, Simulating spin dynamics of supersolid states in a quantum Ising magnet, Physical Review B111, L060402 (2025)

    2025

  75. [83]

    Ulaga, J

    M. Ulaga, J. Kokalj, T. Tohyama, and P. Prelovˇ sek, Easy- axis heisenberg model on the triangular lattice: From a supersolid to a gapped solid, Physical Review B111, 174442 (2025)

    2025

  76. [84]

    M. Zhu, L. M. Chinellato, V. Romerio, N. Murai, S. Ohira-Kawamura, C. Balz, Z. Yan, S. Gvasaliya, Y. Kato, C. D. Batista, and A. Zheludev, Wannier states and spin supersolid physics in the triangular antiferro- magnet K 2Co(SeO3)2, npj Quantum Materials10, 74 (2025)

    2025

  77. [85]

    Sheng, J.-W

    J. Sheng, J.-W. Mei, L. Wang, X. Xu, W. Jiang, L. Xu, H. Ge, N. Zhao, T. Li, A. Candini,et al., Bose–einstein condensation of a two-magnon bound state in a spin-1 triangular lattice, Nature Materials , 1 (2025)

    2025

  78. [86]

    Sheng, J

    J. Sheng, J. Hu, L. Xu, L. Wang, X. Shi, R. Chi, D. Yu, A. Podlesnyak, P. Piyawongwatthana, N. Murai,et al., Unveiling the quadrupole waves in spin nematics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.13888 (2025)

    2025

  79. [87]

    Huang, H

    Q. Huang, H. Zhang, Y. Hao, W. Yao, D. M. Pajerowski, A. A. Aczel, E. S. Choi, K. Barros, B. Normand, H. Zhou, et al., Universal dynamics of a pair condensate, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.13609 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calcula- tions, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 4 (2022)

    2022

  81. [89]

    Verresen, R

    R. Verresen, R. Moessner, and F. Pollmann, Avoided quasiparticle decay from strong quantum interactions, Nature Physics15, 750 (2019)

    2019

  82. [90]

    R. Smit, S. Keupert, O. Tsyplyatyev, P. Maksimov, A. L. 8 Chernyshev, and P. Kopietz, Magnon damping in the zigzag phase of the Kitaev-Heisenberg-γmodel on a hon- eycomb lattice, Physical Review B101, 054424 (2020)

    2020

  83. [91]

    Colpa, Diagonalization of the quadratic boson Hamil- tonian, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Appli- cations93, 327 (1978)

    J. Colpa, Diagonalization of the quadratic boson Hamil- tonian, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Appli- cations93, 327 (1978)

    1978

  84. [92]

    Maldonado, On the Bogoliubov transformation for quadratic boson observables, Journal of Mathematical Physics34, 5016 (1993)

    O. Maldonado, On the Bogoliubov transformation for quadratic boson observables, Journal of Mathematical Physics34, 5016 (1993)

    1993

  85. [93]

    Dissipationless dynamics of spin supersolid states in a spin-1/2 triangular antiferromagnet with impurities

    A. Serga, C. Sandweg, V. Vasyuchka, M. Jungfleisch, B. Hillebrands, A. Kreisel, P. Kopietz, and M. Kostylev, Brillouin light scattering spectroscopy of parametri- cally excited dipole-exchange magnons, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics86, 134403 (2012). ...

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.