Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Identifying Roles, Requirements and Responsibilities in Trustworthy AI Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.08258 v1 pith:3ZELTJRC submitted 2021-06-15 cs.CY

classification cs.CY
keywords systemsdomainsystemconsideridentifypractitionersrequirementsresponsibilities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are being deployed around the globe in critical fields such as healthcare and education. In some cases, expert practitioners in these domains are being tasked with introducing or using such systems, but have little or no insight into what data these complex systems are based on, or how they are put together. In this paper, we consider an AI system from the domain practitioner's perspective and identify key roles that are involved in system deployment. We consider the differing requirements and responsibilities of each role, and identify a tension between transparency and privacy that needs to be addressed so that domain practitioners are able to intelligently assess whether a particular AI system is appropriate for use in their domain.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools