REVIEW 3 cited by
HackAnalysis 2: A powerful and hackable recasting tool
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This is the manual for the version 2 of HackAnalysis, a powerful, lightweight, versatile and, most importantly, hackable, recasting tool. New features in this version include: compressed event format storage for ultra-fast development; integration of new physics and mathematics routines via RestFrames and Eigen; automatic computation of systematic uncertainties; an interface to ONNX for neural networks; easy implementation of new models via QNUMBERS blocks; a python package for interfacing to pyhf, spey and in-built statistics routines for fast computation of experimental limits; improved integration with BSMArt for fast scanning, and a new batch running/convergence check. Several new (electroweakino) analyses are included with this release.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Deciphering compressed electroweakino excesses with MadAnalysis 5
MadAnalysis 5 v1.11 adds validated recasting of two ATLAS compressed-electroweakino searches and shows that a proposed NMSSM scenario fits the soft-lepton and monojet excesses less well than simpler models.
-
A joint explanation for the soft lepton and monojet LHC excesses in the wino-bino model
A combined fit to four LHC Run 2 searches prefers a wino-bino supersymmetric spectrum with m(wino) ~ 320 GeV and mass splitting ~ 20 GeV, compatible with bino dark matter.
-
Recasting the ATLAS search for displaced hadronic jets in the ATLAS calorimeter with additional jets or leptons using surrogate models
An independent check shows ATLAS's surrogate models reproduce official long-lived-particle search efficiencies within about 25% for most benchmark scenarios, with a few factor-of-two outliers.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.