Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 69 references

Miniaturised transmissive multi-plane light converters via laser-written geometric phase holograms cascaded in glass

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A laser-written glass chip can sort ten overlapping Hermite-Gaussian modes in a volume under one cubic millimetre.

desk verdict Genuine proof-of-concept for cascaded laser-written geometric phase MPLCs in glass, but the abstract oversells the results and the 10-mode coupling numbers as printed contradict their own normalization. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.07222 v2 pith:424IS5GX submitted 2026-02-06 physics.optics physics.app-phquant-ph

Unė G. Būtaitė , Martynas Beresna , David B. Phillips This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-phquant-ph
keywords multi-planelightconversiongeometricphasePancharatnam-BerryfemtosecondlaserwritingbirefringentnanogratingsHermite-Gaussianmodesorterfusedsilicasorting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Multi-plane light converters (MPLCs) are cascades of phase masks that reshape a set of input light modes into a set of output modes, but building them is bulky and alignment-sensitive. This paper tries to establish that femtosecond-laser-written geometric phase holograms, cascaded inside a monolithic fused-silica chip, can act as miniaturised transmissive MPLCs. The authors experimentally demonstrate proof-of-concept devices below 0.8 mm³ that sort up to 10 Hermite-Gaussian modes at 633 nm, with measured coupling matrices showing mode-dependent cross-talk. If the approach matures, it offers a single-step route to robust, encapsulated, passively operating mode sorters and linear optical processors.

What carries the argument

The geometric phase hologram: a plane of femtosecond-laser-induced birefringent nanogratings whose local fast-axis orientation φ encodes a phase 2φ on the transmitted circularly polarised field, flipping its handedness. Two vertically separated nanograting layers (44 µm apart) are written per plane to approximate an ideal half-wave plate. Cascading several such planes inside the glass, with free-space (glass) propagation between them, constitutes the MPLC; inverse design via adjoint gradient descent with scalar angular-spectrum propagation sets the phase profiles.

What would settle it

Measure the polarisation state transmitted by a single laser-written geometric phase hologram at 633 nm: if the output is appreciably elliptical (wrong-handed component above a few percent), the phase fidelity assumed in Eq. (1) fails and the elevated crosstalk in the cascaded sorters is explained. A direct test is to simulate the 10-mode coupling matrix using the measured non-ideal Jones matrix and compare with the experimental matrix.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that cascading laser-written birefringent nanogratings inside silica glass creates geometric phase holograms that act as thin phase planes, and that a stack of these planes, inverse-designed and co-registered in a single writing pass, functions as a transmissive MPLC. Each plane imprints a Pancharatnam-Berry phase 2φ on circularly polarised light by locally rotating the fast axis of a half-wave-plate-like structure; diffraction between planes reshapes the field. The authors report two proof-of-concept sorters — a 3-mode and a 10-mode Hermite-Gaussian sorter — with volumes of ~0.5 mm³ and ~0.8 mm³ respectively. They also show a single-plane hologram projecting an image. T

Load-bearing premise

The sorting performance rests on the nanograting layer pair behaving as an ideal half-wave plate, so that no light leaks into the wrong circular polarisation handedness to contaminate downstream planes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Higher mode counts require more phase planes; the inverse-design and fabrication flow is in principle extensible, with the paper noting that more planes maintain fidelity for a given mode number.
  • Improving per-plane efficiency from the current ~20% toward the >90% reported for optimised geometric phase gratings would make multi-plane cascades practical for real applications.
  • Because the device is monolithic and encapsulated in glass, it is robust against environmental perturbations and requires no post-fabrication alignment, unlike SLM-based or free-standing micro-optic MPLCs.
  • The single-step writing process supports rapid prototyping, and the geometric phase approach can be extended to vectorial elements (q-plates, polarisation converters) for vectorial MPLCs.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural falsifying experiment is to measure the output polarisation ellipticity of a single written hologram; if the wrong-handed component is large, the excess crosstalk in the 10-mode sorter is explained without invoking fabrication randomness.
  • The mode-dependent crosstalk pattern suggests input-mode generation quality is a major contributor; an experiment using a faithfully generated set of HG modes (e.g., via a photonic lantern or fiber source) could isolate the device's intrinsic crosstalk.
  • If the geometric phase response is achromatic enough, these glass chips could serve as broadband mode sorters; measuring the coupling matrix at a second wavelength would test that.
  • Integration with other laser-written components (waveguides, volume optics) in the same glass block is a plausible route to fully monolithic photonic circuits, a step the paper hints at but does not demonstrate.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a proof-of-concept fabrication of miniaturised transmissive multi-plane light converters (MPLCs) inside fused silica glass using femtosecond-laser-written geometric phase holograms. Two 2-plane devices are designed via inverse design and experimentally characterized: a 3-mode and a 10-mode Hermite-Gaussian (HG) mode sorter, operating at 633 nm. Measured coupling matrices are presented for both devices. The abstract, however, claims additional demonstrations (5-plane devices, sorting 28 HG modes, a 7-mode speckle sorter, and optical matrix multiplication) that are not described in the body of the paper.

Significance. The fabrication route is of interest: cascaded geometric phase holograms written in glass could offer compact, monolithic, passive MPLCs, avoiding alignment and encapsulation issues. The 3-mode sorter is demonstrated with measured coupling data, and the discussion honestly identifies limitations (efficiency ~20% per plane, polarization conversion fidelity, scattering). However, the central quantitative evidence for the 10-mode sorter – the coupling matrix in Fig. 3(b) – is internally inconsistent with the stated column normalization, and the abstract overstates the results. The overall significance is therefore conditional on correcting these issues.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract vs. Results] The abstract claims demonstration of MPLCs formed from up to 5 phase masks, sorting up to 28 HG modes, a 7-mode speckle sorter, and analogue optical matrix multiplications, with a volume of ~0.15 mm³. None of these results appear in the body; the experimental devices are two-plane, 3-mode and 10-mode sorters, with volumes ~0.5 mm³ and ~0.8 mm³. This is a serious mismatch between the abstract and the content and must be corrected.
  2. [Fig. 3(b) and 10-mode sorter section] The caption states that each column of the coupling matrix is normalized to 1 and reports mean off-diagonal intensity values of 0.13 (simulated) and 0.58 (experimental) for the 10×10 matrix. For a nonnegative column-normalized matrix, the 90 off-diagonal entries sum to at most 10, so their mean cannot exceed 10/90 ≈ 0.111. Both reported values violate this bound. The reported normalization and means cannot both be correct. This invalidates the quantitative support for the claim that 'in most cases power is focussed into the correct output channel'. The authors must supply the actual matrices or a corrected analysis.
  3. [Results, 10-mode sorter paragraph] The statement 'We see that in most cases power is focussed into the correct output channel' is not supported by the reported mean off-diagonal of 0.58, which would imply that off-diagonal channels receive more power on average than the diagonal (indeed impossible under the stated normalization). The claim needs to be backed by the raw coupling data or a corrected matrix.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2 (CGH)] Typo: 'CHG' should be 'CGH' (computer generated hologram).
  2. [Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 captions] The figure captions do not specify the ordering of the HG modes; adding a mode index would improve reproducibility.
  3. [Methods] The Methods give laser parameters (pulse duration, repetition rate, writing speed, number of pulses) but not the average power or pulse energy; these are needed to reproduce the fabrication.
  4. [Main text] The sentence 'These results were first presented at Photon 2024' in the main text is unusual for a journal article; consider moving to acknowledgments or a footnote.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: device performance is tested against measured output data and no prediction reduces to a fitted input.

full rationale

The paper's core derivation chain is Eq. (1), a standard Jones-calculus statement that a half-wave plate with fast-axis angle phi converts left-circularly polarized light into right-circularly polarized light with a geometric phase 2phi; it contains no hidden dependence on the target sorting result. The phase-mask designs are obtained by an inverse-design algorithm cited from ref. [19] ('described in our previous work [19]'); this is a normal methodological dependency, not a load-bearing assertion of the present device's validity, and the present experiments are external tests: the phase masks are fabricated, illuminated with prepared HG modes, and the coupling matrices are measured rather than re-fitted to the measured data. The reported simulation/experiment comparison is therefore an independent benchmark. The 'nearly ideal half-wave plate' assumption (two 44-micrometre-spaced nanograting layers) is a fabrication approximation whose failure is openly discussed as a source of pollution, not an assumption that already contains the sorter's success. The only notable issue, the Fig. 3(b) inconsistency between column normalization and mean off-diagonal values (0.13 and 0.58 for a 10x10 matrix), is an internal numerical/evidence-quality problem, not circularity: it does not show that any claimed outcome was built into the inputs. Thus there is no self-definitional, fitted-input-as-prediction, self-citation-load-bearing, uniqueness-import, ansatz-smuggling, or renaming step.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central demonstration rests on the validity of the geometric-phase half-wave-plate model and the scalar-diffraction inverse-design model. No new physical entities or fundamental constants are introduced. The free parameters are engineering choices made by hand; none are fitted to the measured coupling matrices.

free parameters (5)
  • Phase mask pixel pitch = 2 µm
    Chosen by hand as a compromise between resolution and writing time; directly affects device performance.
  • Inter-plane separation = 2 mm
    Chosen for the proof-of-concept design; controls diffraction between phase masks.
  • Phase quantization levels = 4 levels (CGH), 6 levels (MPLC masks)
    Rounded phase levels chosen to balance beam-shaping fidelity and laser-writing time.
  • Nanograting layers per phase plane = 2 layers, 44 µm vertical spacing
    Chosen so that the plane approximates a half-wave plate; this is load-bearing for the geometric-phase mechanism.
  • Writing depth of first plane = ~170 µm; second plane 2 mm deeper
    Arbitrary depths chosen for the proof-of-concept; affect aberrations and plane co-registration.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The fs-laser-written nanograting pixel acts as an ideal half-wave plate with fast-axis angle φ, so a circularly polarised input acquires phase 2φ (Eq. 1).
    Invoked throughout the design and fabrication; the Discussion notes that imperfect polarisation conversion produces an unwanted elliptically polarised component.
  • domain assumption The inverse-design model uses scalar diffraction theory with the angular spectrum method and assumes the phase masks are infinitely thin with uniform polarisation across each plane.
    Stated in the inverse-design paragraph of Results; mismatch between this model and the physical device is acknowledged as a source of cross-talk.
  • domain assumption Two nanograting layers separated by 44 µm do not overwrite each other and together behave approximately like a half-wave plate at 633 nm.
    Stated in Methods; the whole MPLC concept depends on this approximation holding at the read-out wavelength.
  • domain assumption Planes written from last to first preserve previously written planes, and the translation stages co-register the planes accurately.
    Stated in Methods; the claimed advantage of automatic co-registration relies on this.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Miniaturised transmissive multi-plane light converters via laser-written geometric phase holograms cascaded in glass." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/424IS5GX

@misc{pith2026260207222,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Miniaturised transmissive multi-plane light converters via laser-written geometric phase holograms cascaded in glass},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/424IS5GX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.07222}
}
read the original abstract

Multi-plane light converters (MPLCs) are an emerging beam shaping technology capable of deterministically mapping a basis of input spatial light modes to a different basis of output modes. The ability to perform such multi-modal spatial reformatting operations has many future applications in both classical and quantum photonics, spanning from optical communications to photonic computing and advanced imaging. In this work we fabricate miniaturised transmissive MPLCs fully-encapsulated within a fused silica glass chip using single-step 3D direct laser writing. Our approach relies on the formation of femto-second laser induced birefringent nanogratings with a spatially controllable slow-axis orientation. Multiple layers of these nanogratings are laser-written throughout the volume of the glass to create a sequence of axially separated geometric phase holograms which imprint controllable phase patterns onto circularly polarised read-out light propagating through them. We construct and test a range of proof-of-concept laser-written MPLCs operating in the visible (lambda = 633nm). These miniature beam multiplexers are formed from up to 5 separate phase masks of width ~260um, cascaded along a total length of ~2.7mm, thus occupying a compact volume of ~0.15 mm3. We first demonstrate Hermite-Gaussian (HG) mode sorters capable of diverting the energy carried by up to 28 overlapping HG modes into spatially separated output channels. We next create a 7-mode orthogonal speckle sorter, highlighting the universal nature of the spatial transformations it is possible to encode. Finally, we show analogue optical matrix multiplications achieved by passively scattering light through these 3D structured glass elements. Our work begins to merge the concepts of free-space optics with 3D integrated photonics in glass and plots a path towards the rapid prototyping of robust monolithic MPLC technology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.07222 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. illustrates our concept. Each phase mask is fabri￾cated by generating fs-laser induced birefringent nanogratings within high-purity silica glass [48–51]. The fast-axis ori￾entation of these birefringent structures is controlled by the orientation of the linear polarisation state of the writing beam [52]. By rotating the orientation of these nanogratings as a function of position, it is possible to laser-fabricate ge… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) shows the result of illuminating our laser￾written single-plane geometric phase hologram with a Gaus￾sian beam of beam diameter of ≤1 mm. We observe the target image (a tropical island sunset scene in this case) appearing in the far-field of the hologram, atop a low intensity speck￾led background. We also observe a bright spot in the zero diffraction order, which we measure to contain ∼13% of the energy transmit… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) shows simulated versus experimentally measured outputs of the 10-mode HG mode sorter when illuminated with all 10 input HG modes in turn. We see that in most cases power is focussed into the correct output channel, while there is also an increased level of mode coupling in comparison with the 3-mode sorter. Analysing the coupling matrices ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Roadmap on structured light,

    Halina Rubinsztein-Dunlop, Andrew Forbes, Michael V Berry, Mark R Dennis, David L Andrews, Masud Mansuripur, Cor- nelia Denz, Christina Alpmann, Peter Banzer, Thomas Bauer, et al., “Roadmap on structured light,” Journal of Optics19, 013001 (2016)

    2016

  2. [2]

    Roadmap on multimode photonics,

    Ilaria Cristiani, Cosimo Lacava, Georg Rademacher, Ben- jamin J Puttnam, Ruben S Lu `ıs, Cristian Antonelli, Antonio Mecozzi, Mark Shtaif, Daniele Cozzolino, Davide Bacco,et al., “Roadmap on multimode photonics,” Journal of Optics24, 083001 (2022)

    2022

  3. [3]

    Roadmap on spatiotemporal light fields,

    Yijie Shen, Qiwen Zhan, Logan G Wright, Demetrios N Christodoulides, Frank W Wise, Alan E Willner, Kai-heng Zou, Zhe Zhao, Miguel A Porras, Andy Chong,et al., “Roadmap on spatiotemporal light fields,” Journal of Optics25, 093001 (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    Time reversed optical waves by arbitrary vector spatiotemporal field generation,

    Mickael Mounaix, Nicolas K Fontaine, David T Neilson, Roland Ryf, Haoshuo Chen, Juan Carlos Alvarado-Zacarias, and Joel Carpenter, “Time reversed optical waves by arbitrary vector spatiotemporal field generation,” Nature communica- tions11, 5813 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    Sorting out light,

    David AB Miller, “Sorting out light,” Science347, 1423–1424 (2015). 7

    2015

  6. [6]

    Programmable unitary spatial mode manipulation,

    Jean-Franc ¸ois Morizur, Lachlan Nicholls, Pu Jian, Seiji Arm- strong, Nicolas Treps, Boris Hage, Magnus Hsu, Warwick Bowen, Jiri Janousek, and Hans-A Bachor, “Programmable unitary spatial mode manipulation,” JOSA A27, 2524–2531 (2010)

    2010

  7. [7]

    Effi- cient and mode selective spatial mode multiplexer based on multi-plane light conversion,

    Guillaume Labroille, Bertrand Denolle, Pu Jian, Philippe Genevaux, Nicolas Treps, and Jean-Franc ¸ois Morizur, “Effi- cient and mode selective spatial mode multiplexer based on multi-plane light conversion,” Optics express22, 15599–15607 (2014)

    2014

  8. [8]

    Dynamic 2d implementation of 3d diffractive optics,

    Haiyan Wang and Rafael Piestun, “Dynamic 2d implementation of 3d diffractive optics,” Optica5, 1220–1228 (2018)

    2018

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    Laguerre- gaussian mode sorter,

    Nicolas K Fontaine, Roland Ryf, Haoshuo Chen, David T Neilson, Kwangwoong Kim, and Joel Carpenter, “Laguerre- gaussian mode sorter,” Nature communications10, 1–7 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    High-dimensional quantum gates using full-field spatial modes of photons,

    Florian Brandt, Markus Hiekkam ¨aki, Fr´ed´eric Bouchard, Mar- cus Huber, and Robert Fickler, “High-dimensional quantum gates using full-field spatial modes of photons,” Optica7, 98– 107 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Wafer scale fabrication of multi-plane light conversion devices,

    Nicolas K Fontaine, Yetian Huang, Hanzi Huang, Lauren Dal- lachiesa, Mikael Mazur, Roland Ryf, Haoshuo Chen, David T Neilson, Mark Earnshaw, Mark Cappuzzo,et al., “Wafer scale fabrication of multi-plane light conversion devices,” in49th Eu- ropean Conference on Optical Communi...

    2023

  4. [12]

    All-optical ma- chine learning using diffractive deep neural networks,

    Xing Lin, Yair Rivenson, Nezih T Yardimci, Muhammed Veli, Yi Luo, Mona Jarrahi, and Aydogan Ozcan, “All-optical ma- chine learning using diffractive deep neural networks,” Science 361, 1004–1008 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    Diffractive neural networks for mode-sorting with flexible detection regions,

    Kaden Bearne, Alexander Duplinskiy, Matthew J Filipovich, and AI Lvovsky, “Diffractive neural networks for mode-sorting with flexible detection regions,” Optics & Laser Technology 195, 114544 (2026)

    2026

  6. [14]

    Optical circuit design based on a wavefront-matching method,

    T Hashimoto, T Saida, I Ogawa, M Kohtoku, Tomohiro Shi- bata, and Hiroshi Takahashi, “Optical circuit design based on a wavefront-matching method,” Optics letters30, 2620–2622 (2005)

    2005

  7. [15]

    Free-space information transfer using light beams carrying orbital angular momentum,

    Graham Gibson, Johannes Courtial, Miles J Padgett, Mikhail Vasnetsov, Valeriy Pas’ ko, Stephen M Barnett, and Sonja Franke-Arnold, “Free-space information transfer using light beams carrying orbital angular momentum,” Optics express12, 5448–5456 (2004)

    2004

  8. [16]

    Exploiting multimode waveguides for pure fibre-based imaging,

    Tom ´aˇs ˇCiˇzm´ar and Kishan Dholakia, “Exploiting multimode waveguides for pure fibre-based imaging,” Nature communica- tions3, 1027 (2012)

    2012

  9. [17]

    Modal beam splitter: deter- mination of the transversal components of an electromagnetic light field,

    Michael Mazilu, Tom Vettenburg, Martin Ploschner, Ewan M Wright, and Kishan Dholakia, “Modal beam splitter: deter- mination of the transversal components of an electromagnetic light field,” Scientific reports7, 9139 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    Hermite-gaussian mode multiplexer support- ing 1035 modes,

    Nicolas K Fontaine, Haoshuo Chen, Mikael Mazur, Lauren Dallachiesa, KW Kim, Roland Ryf, David Neilson, and Joel Carpenter, “Hermite-gaussian mode multiplexer support- ing 1035 modes,” inOptical Fiber Communication Conference (Optical Society of America, 2021) pp. M3D–4

    2021

  11. [19]

    High-dimensional spatial mode sorting and optical circuit de- sign using multi-plane light conversion,

    Hlib Kupianskyi, Simon AR Horsley, and David B Phillips, “High-dimensional spatial mode sorting and optical circuit de- sign using multi-plane light conversion,” APL Photonics8 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Inverse design of high- dimensional quantum optical circuits in a complex medium,

    Suraj Goel, Saroch Leedumrongwatthanakun, Natalia Herrera Valencia, Will McCutcheon, Armin Tavakoli, Claudio Conti, Pepijn WH Pinkse, and Mehul Malik, “Inverse design of high- dimensional quantum optical circuits in a complex medium,” Nature Physics20, 232–239 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Self-configuring high-speed multi-plane light conver- sion,

    Jos ´e C A. Rocha, Un ˙e G B¯utait˙e, Joel Carpenter, and David B Phillips, “Self-configuring high-speed multi-plane light conver- sion,” Nature Communications (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    Space- division multiplexing in optical fibres,

    David J Richardson, John M Fini, and Lynn E Nelson, “Space- division multiplexing in optical fibres,” Nature photonics7, 354–362 (2013)

    2013

  15. [23]

    Photonic lanterns, 3-d waveguides, multi- plane light conversion, and other components that enable space- division multiplexing,

    Nicolas K Fontaine, Joel Carpenter, Simon Gross, Sergio Leon- Saval, Yongmin Jung, David J Richardson, and Rodrigo Amezcua-Correa, “Photonic lanterns, 3-d waveguides, multi- plane light conversion, and other components that enable space- division multiplexing,” Proceedings of ...

    2022

  16. [24]

    3.56 peta-bit/s c+ l band transmission over a 55-mode multi-mode fiber,

    Georg Rademacher, Ruben S Lu ´ıs, Benjamin J Puttnam, Nico- las K Fontaine, Mikael Mazur, Haoshuo Chen, Roland Ryf, David T Neilson, Daniel Dahl, Joel Carpenter,et al., “3.56 peta-bit/s c+ l band transmission over a 55-mode multi-mode fiber,” in49th European Conference on Opti...

    2023

  17. [25]

    Ultra-sensitive separation estimation of optical sources,

    Cl ´ementine Rouvi `ere, David Barral, Antonin Grateau, Ilya Karuseichyk, Giacomo Sorelli, Mattia Walschaers, and Nico- las Treps, “Ultra-sensitive separation estimation of optical sources,” Optica11, 166–170 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Ex- perimental demonstration of a quantum-optimal coronagraph using spatial mode sorters,

    Nico Deshler, Itay Ozer, Amit Ashok, and Saikat Guha, “Ex- perimental demonstration of a quantum-optimal coronagraph using spatial mode sorters,” Optica12, 518–529 (2025)

    2025

  19. [27]

    How to build the “optical inverse

    Un ˙e G B ¯utait˙e, Hlib Kupianskyi, Tom´aˇs ˇCiˇzm´ar, and David B Phillips, “How to build the “optical inverse” of a multimode fibre,” Intelligent Computing (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    All-optically untangling light propagation through multimode fibers,

    Hlib Kupianskyi, Simon AR Horsley, and David B Phillips, “All-optically untangling light propagation through multimode fibers,” Optica11, 101–112 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    All-optical image transportation through a multimode fibre using a miniaturized diffractive neural network on the dis- tal facet,

    Haoyi Yu, Zihao Huang, Simone Lamon, Baokai Wang, Haibo Ding, Jian Lin, Qi Wang, Haitao Luan, Min Gu, and Qiming Zhang, “All-optical image transportation through a multimode fibre using a miniaturized diffractive neural network on the dis- tal facet,” Nature Photonics , 1–8 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Tracing multiple scattering trajectories for deep optical imaging in scat- tering media,

    Sungsam Kang, Yongwoo Kwon, Hojun Lee, Seho Kim, Jin Hee Hong, Seokchan Yoon, and Wonshik Choi, “Tracing multiple scattering trajectories for deep optical imaging in scat- tering media,” Nature communications14, 6871 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Understanding multi- layered transmission matrices,

    Anat Levin and Marina Alterman, “Understanding multi- layered transmission matrices,” inProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference(2025) pp. 23164– 23173

    2025

  24. [32]

    Optical matrix– matrix multiplier based on outer product decomposition,

    Ravindra A Athale and William C Collins, “Optical matrix– matrix multiplier based on outer product decomposition,” Ap- plied optics21, 2089–2090 (1982)

  25. [33]

    Photonic matrix multiplication lights up photonic accelerator and beyond,

    Hailong Zhou, Jianji Dong, Junwei Cheng, Wenchan Dong, Chaoran Huang, Yichen Shen, Qiming Zhang, Min Gu, Chao Qian, Hongsheng Chen,et al., “Photonic matrix multiplication lights up photonic accelerator and beyond,” Light: Science & Applications11, 30 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Training of physical neural networks,

    Ali Momeni, Babak Rahmani, Benjamin Scellier, Logan G Wright, Peter L McMahon, Clara C Wanjura, Yuhang Li, Anas Skalli, Natalia G Berloff, Tatsuhiro Onodera,et al., “Training of physical neural networks,” Nature645, 53–61 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    Processing entangled photons in high dimensions with a programmable light converter,

    Ohad Lib, Kfir Sulimany, and Yaron Bromberg, “Processing entangled photons in high dimensions with a programmable light converter,” Physical Review Applied18, 014063 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Resource-efficient photonic quantum computation with high-dimensional cluster states,

    Ohad Lib and Yaron Bromberg, “Resource-efficient photonic quantum computation with high-dimensional cluster states,” Nature Photonics , 1–7 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    Quan- tum information processing with spatially structured light,

    Suraj Goel, Bohnishikha Ghosh, and Mehul Malik, “Quan- tum information processing with spatially structured light,” Ad- 8 vanced Photonics8, 014005–014005 (2026)

    2026

  30. [38]

    Multicasting optical reconfig- urable switch,

    Niyazi Ulas Dinc, Mustafa Yildirim, Ilker Oguz, Christophe Moser, and Demetri Psaltis, “Multicasting optical reconfig- urable switch,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.14173 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Adjoint-optimized metasurfaces for compact mode-division multiplexing,

    Jaewon Oh, Kangmei Li, Jun Yang, Wei Ting Chen, Ming-Jun Li, Paulo Dainese, and Federico Capasso, “Adjoint-optimized metasurfaces for compact mode-division multiplexing,” ACS photonics9, 929–937 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Complete vectorial optical mode converter using multi- layer metasurface,

    Go Soma, Kento Komatsu, Yoshiaki Nakano, and Takuo Tane- mura, “Complete vectorial optical mode converter using multi- layer metasurface,” Nature Communications16, 7744 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Direct (3+ 1) d laser writing of graded-index optical elements,

    Xavier Porte, Niyazi Ulas Dinc, Johnny Moughames, Giulia Panusa, Caroline Juliano, Muamer Kadic, Christophe Moser, Daniel Brunner, and Demetri Psaltis, “Direct (3+ 1) d laser writing of graded-index optical elements,” Optica8, 1281–1287 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    Demultiplexing through a multimode fiber using chip-scale diffractive neural networks,

    Qian Zhang, Haoyi Yu, Jie Zhang, Yuedi Zhang, Chao Meng, Jiali Sun, Yu Miao, Qiming Zhang, Min Gu, and Juer- gen W Czarske, “Demultiplexing through a multimode fiber using chip-scale diffractive neural networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.04767 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    3d-patterned inverse-designed mid-infrared metaop- tics,

    Gregory Roberts, Conner Ballew, Tianzhe Zheng, Juan C Gar- cia, Sarah Camayd-Mu ˜noz, Philip WC Hon, and Andrei Faraon, “3d-patterned inverse-designed mid-infrared metaop- tics,” Nature Communications14, 2768 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    Aperiodic volume optics,

    Tim D Gerke and Rafael Piestun, “Aperiodic volume optics,” Nature photonics4, 188–193 (2010)

    2010

  37. [45]

    Inverse design of gradient-index volume multimode converters,

    Nicolas Barr ´e and Alexander Jesacher, “Inverse design of gradient-index volume multimode converters,” Optics Express 30, 10573–10587 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    Direct laser-written aperiodic photonic volume elements for complex light shaping with high efficiency: inverse design and fabrication,

    Nicolas Barr ´e, Ravi Shivaraman, Simon Moser, Patrick Salter, Michael Schmidt, Martin J Booth, and Alexander Jesacher, “Direct laser-written aperiodic photonic volume elements for complex light shaping with high efficiency: inverse design and fabrication,” Advanced Photonics ...

    2023

  39. [47]

    Pho- ton 2024, institute of physics (uk) conference on optics and pho- tonics,

    Un ˙e G B¯utait˙e, Martynas Beresna, and David B Phillips, “Pho- ton 2024, institute of physics (uk) conference on optics and pho- tonics,” (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    Self-organized nanogratings in glass irradiated by ultrashort light pulses,

    Yasuhiko Shimotsuma, Peter G Kazansky, Jiarong Qiu, and Kazuoki Hirao, “Self-organized nanogratings in glass irradiated by ultrashort light pulses,” Physical review letters91, 247405 (2003)

    2003

  41. [49]

    Optically produced arrays of planar nanostructures inside fused silica,

    VR Bhardwaj, E Simova, PP Rajeev, C Hnatovsky, RS Taylor, DM Rayner, and PB Corkum, “Optically produced arrays of planar nanostructures inside fused silica,” Physical review let- ters96, 057404 (2006)

    2006

  42. [50]

    Scanning thermal microscopy and raman analysis of bulk fused silica exposed to low-energy femtosecond laser pulses,

    Yves Bellouard, E Barthel, AA Said, M Dugan, and Ph Bado, “Scanning thermal microscopy and raman analysis of bulk fused silica exposed to low-energy femtosecond laser pulses,” Optics Express16, 19520–19534 (2008)

    2008

  43. [51]

    Nanogratings in fused silica: Formation, control, and applications,

    S ¨oren Richter, Matthias Heinrich, Sven D ¨oring, Andreas T¨unnermann, Stefan Nolte, and Ulf Peschel, “Nanogratings in fused silica: Formation, control, and applications,” Journal of Laser Applications24(2012)

    2012

  44. [52]

    Ultrafast laser direct writing and nanostructuring in trans- parent materials,

    Martynas Beresna, Mindaugas Gecevi ˇcius, and Peter G Kazan- sky, “Ultrafast laser direct writing and nanostructuring in trans- parent materials,” Advances in Optics and Photonics6, 293– 339 (2014)

    2014

  45. [53]

    Radially polarized optical vortex converter created by femtosecond laser nanostructuring of glass,

    Martynas Beresna, Mindaugas Gecevi ˇcius, Peter G Kazansky, and Titas Gertus, “Radially polarized optical vortex converter created by femtosecond laser nanostructuring of glass,” Applied Physics Letters98(2011)

    2011

  46. [54]

    High-performance geometric phase elements in silica glass,

    Rokas Drevinskas and Peter G Kazansky, “High-performance geometric phase elements in silica glass,” APL Photonics2 (2017)

    2017

  47. [55]

    Generalized theory of in- terference, and its applications: Part i. coherent pencils,

    Shivaramakrishnan Pancharatnam, “Generalized theory of in- terference, and its applications: Part i. coherent pencils,” inPro- ceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences-Section A, V ol. 44 (Springer, 1956) pp. 247–262

    1956

  48. [56]

    Quantal phase factors accompany- ing adiabatic changes,

    Michael Victor Berry, “Quantal phase factors accompany- ing adiabatic changes,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences392, 45–57 (1984)

    1984

  49. [57]

    The geometric phase,

    Jeeva Anandan, “The geometric phase,” Nature360, 307–313 (1992)

    1992

  50. [58]

    Gerchberg–saxton and yang–gu algorithms for phase retrieval in a nonunitary transform system: a compar- ison,

    Guo-zhen Yang, Bi-zhen Dong, Ben-yuan Gu, Jie-yao Zhuang, and Okan K Ersoy, “Gerchberg–saxton and yang–gu algorithms for phase retrieval in a nonunitary transform system: a compar- ison,” Applied optics33, 209–218 (1994)

    1994

  51. [59]

    Programmable spatiotemporal oam opti- cal toroidal beams with completely tunable properties,

    Andrew V Komonen, Nicolas K Fontaine, Martin Pl ¨oschner, Marcos Maestre Morote, David T Neilson, Joel Carpenter, and Mickael Mounaix, “Programmable spatiotemporal oam opti- cal toroidal beams with completely tunable properties,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.20365 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  52. [60]

    In situ wavefront correction and its application to micromanipulation,

    Tom ´aˇs ˇCiˇzm´ar, Michael Mazilu, and Kishan Dholakia, “In situ wavefront correction and its application to micromanipulation,” Nature Photonics4, 388–394 (2010)

    2010

  53. [61]

    Encoding amplitude information onto phase-only filters,

    Jeffrey A Davis, Don M Cottrell, Juan Campos, Mar´ıa J Yzuel, and Ignacio Moreno, “Encoding amplitude information onto phase-only filters,” Applied optics38, 5004–5013 (1999)

    1999

  54. [62]

    Near-optimal decom- position of unitary matrices using phase masks and the discrete fourier transform,

    Vincent Girouard and Nicol ´as Quesada, “Near-optimal decom- position of unitary matrices using phase masks and the discrete fourier transform,” Journal of the Optical Society of America B 43, A66–A73 (2025)

    2025

  55. [63]

    Extraor- dinary anisotropy of ultrafast laser writing in glass,

    Mindaugas Gecevi ˇcius, Martynas Beresna, Jingyu Zhang, Wei- jia Yang, Hiromichi Takebe, and Peter G Kazansky, “Extraor- dinary anisotropy of ultrafast laser writing in glass,” Optics ex- press21, 3959–3968 (2013)

    2013

  56. [64]

    Ex- ploring the depth range for three-dimensional laser machining with aberration correction,

    PS Salter, M Baum, I Alexeev, M Schmidt, and MJ Booth, “Ex- ploring the depth range for three-dimensional laser machining with aberration correction,” Optics express22, 17644–17656 (2014)

    2014

  57. [65]

    The characteristic of birefringence and optical loss in femtosecond-laser-induced region in terms of nanogratings dis- tribution,

    Takafumi Ohfuchi, Yuya Yamada, Masaaki Sakakura, Naoaki Fukuda, Toshio Takiya, Yasuhiko Shimotsuma, and Kiyotaka Miura, “The characteristic of birefringence and optical loss in femtosecond-laser-induced region in terms of nanogratings dis- tribution,” Journal of Laser Micro Na...

    2017

  58. [66]

    Ultralow-loss geometric phase and polar- ization shaping by ultrafast laser writing in silica glass,

    Masaaki Sakakura, Yuhao Lei, Lei Wang, Yan-Hao Yu, and Peter G Kazansky, “Ultralow-loss geometric phase and polar- ization shaping by ultrafast laser writing in silica glass,” Light: Science & Applications9, 15 (2020)

    2020

  59. [67]

    Op- tical spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in inhomo- geneous anisotropic media,

    Lorenzo Marrucci, Carlo Manzo, and Domenico Paparo, “Op- tical spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in inhomo- geneous anisotropic media,” Physical review letters96, 163905 (2006)

    2006

  60. [68]

    Azimuthal multiplexing 3d diffractive optics,

    Haiyan Wang and Rafael Piestun, “Azimuthal multiplexing 3d diffractive optics,” Scientific reports10, 1–9 (2020)

    2020

  61. [69]

    Complex modulation of light in polarization and space us- ing laser-written multi-plane light conversion,

    Oussama Korichi, Markus Hiekkam ¨aki, and Robert Fickler, “Complex modulation of light in polarization and space us- ing laser-written multi-plane light conversion,” inInternational Conference on Metamaterials, Photonic Crystals and Plasmon- ics(2025) pp. 398–399

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.