Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 89 references

Modeling the laser-pulse induced helium trimer dynamics

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A laser kick to the helium trimer leaves interference fingerprints in its alignment signal.

desk verdict First full trimer laser-kick dynamics with a clean formalism, but the central interference fingerprint needs a convergence check on the observable itself before the exclusive J=0/J=2 attribution is taken as established. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04031 v1 pith:43HQOD7M submitted 2025-02-06 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gas

Q. Guan , J. Kruse , M. Kunitski , R. Doerner , D. Blume This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.quant-gas
keywords heliumtrimerlaser-inducedmoleculardynamicshypersphericalcoordinateswavepacketpropagationpartialdecompositionalignmentvanderWaalsclusterkineticenergyrelease
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper simulates what happens when an isolated, extremely floppy helium trimer is hit by a short, linearly polarized pump laser pulse that excites only nuclear motion. It develops a wave packet propagation scheme in hyperspherical coordinates that exploits the pulse being much shorter than molecular time scales by treating the pulse as a delta-function kick with matched area. The central result is that the hyperradius-resolved alignment signal $\langle\cos^2\beta\rangle(\rho,t)$ shows finger-like stripes that are signatures of interference between the $J=0$ and $J=2$ partial wave components of the kicked wave packet. A simplified model built from the helium dimer wave packet, with one scaling factor, reproduces the key features of the trimer signal. The work gives pump-probe experiments a concrete prediction: the orientation response of a weakly-bound trimer is not rigid-body rotation but a size-dependent interference pattern.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is a partial-wave decomposition of the time-dependent trimer wave packet in hyperspherical coordinates, using the hyperradius $\rho$, hyperangles $\theta$ and $\phi$ for shape, and Euler angles $\beta$ and $\gamma$ for orientation. Because the Gaussian pulse is approximated by a delta function in time, the pulse acts as an instantaneous phase factor $\exp[i\varphi]$ multiplying the ground state at $t=0^+$; after that, each angular momentum channel evolves under the field-free Hamiltonian. Channel functions combine rotation matrices with numerically constructed angular functions, and the dynamics reduces to coupled one-dimensional equations for the hyperradial weights $F^{(J)}_{m,n}(\rho,t)$. The observable $\langle\cos^2\beta\rangle(\rho,t)$ is expressed in terms of these weights, and the finger-like pattern is traced to the $\rho$- and $t$-dependent phase difference $\delta^{(2)}_{0,0}(\rho,t)-\delta^{(0)}_{0,0}(\rho,t)$ between the $J=0$ and $J=2$ components.

What would settle it

Compute the same $\langle\cos^2\beta\rangle(\rho,t)$ signal with the explicit Gaussian pulse envelope instead of the delta kick; if the finger-like interference pattern shifts, disappears, or changes its fringe count, the central interference interpretation is wrong. A pump-probe Coulomb-explosion imaging experiment on the laser-kicked trimer at several delays would provide the corresponding data check.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the alignment of the laser-kicked helium trimer, resolved by hyperradius $\rho$ and time $t$, contains a finger-like pattern that is a direct signature of coherent interference between the $J=0$ and $J=2$ partial wave components. The paper derives the expression for $\langle\cos^2\beta\rangle(\rho,t)$ as a constant $1/3$ plus an interference term controlled by the phase difference between the hyperradial weights of the two channels, and it shows that a two-channel calculation using only the $(J,m,n)=(0,0,0)$ and $(2,0,0)$ states reproduces the finger pattern of the full calculation semi-quantitatively. It further claims that a dimer-based model, using only two-body input and one adjustable scaling factor, captures the key characteristics of the trimer alignment signal, suggesting that the laser acts predominantly on one two-body bond while the third atom responds to the changes. This reframes the trimer's response to a short laser pulse as an observable interference phenomenon rather than as a rotational revival of a rigid molecule.

Load-bearing premise

The whole simulation rests on replacing the Gaussian pump pulse with a time-zero delta kick of the same area, an approximation benchmarked for the dimer but not yet checked for the trimer.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For weakly-bound van der Waals trimers, rovibrational coupling is non-negligible, so rigid-body descriptions are inappropriate and orientation observables must be resolved by internal size.
  • The hyperradius-resolved alignment signal can be interpreted as a phase-difference map between the $J=0$ and $J=2$ wave packet components.
  • A dimer-based model with one scaling factor captures the main alignment features, supporting the picture that the laser acts mainly on a single two-body bond.
  • The directly measurable kinetic energy release distribution separates into a stationary bound-state part and time-dependent scattering contributions.
  • The framework extends to other weakly-bound trimers and to identical fermions whenever the channel expansion converges.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the paper leaves implicit: tuning the pulse area could amplify the tiny occupation of the diffuse excited bound state and expose its contribution to the size-resolved alignment signal.
  • Because the delta-function model depends only on the pulse area, the predicted finger pattern should survive across different intensity-duration pairs; that is a testable scaling relation for experiments.
  • A natural next step beyond trimers is the tetramer: if the laser acts mainly on one two-body bond, the dimer-input construction predicts which cluster response features survive the added spectator atoms.
  • Until an explicit Gaussian-pulse calculation is done, the phase-difference formula remains the cleanest diagnostic for whether the predicted fringes are robust or an artifact of the instantaneous-kick idealization.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. Guan et al. develop a time-dependent wave packet framework for the laser-pulse induced nuclear dynamics of the helium trimer, using hyperspherical coordinates and a partial wave expansion in total angular momentum J (J = 0, 2, 4). The laser pulse is approximated by a delta-function in time with matched area (Eq. 19), which yields an instantaneous phase imprint on the ground state. The authors perform a convergence analysis of the t = 0+ partial wave decomposition, time-propagate the wave packet for 50 ps, and analyze the kinetic energy release and orientation dynamics. The main reported result is a hyperradius-resolved alignment signal ⟨cos²β⟩(ρ,t) exhibiting finger-like patterns, which they attribute to interference between J = 0 and J = 2 partial wave components, and a dimer-based model with one adjustable scaling parameter that reproduces qualitative features.

Significance. The framework is a valuable extension of earlier dimer studies to a weakly-bound trimer, and the predicted observables (kinetic energy release, alignment) are directly relevant to ongoing COLTRIMS pump-probe experiments. The numerical implementation is carefully described, and the convergence analysis of the total probabilities P^(J) at t = 0+ is thorough, with the basis capturing 99.5% of the wave packet. The paper is transparent about its approximations, including the delta-function pulse and the Jastrow-based dimer model. If the interpretation of the finger-like pattern as J = 0–J = 2 interference is confirmed by a convergence study of the observable itself, the paper will provide a clear physical picture of the laser-induced rovibrational dynamics of a halo trimer. The connection to the dimer interference phenomenon of Ref. [36] is also compelling.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. V, Figs. 7 and 8; Sec. III B] The central claim that the finger-like patterns in ⟨cos²β⟩(ρ,t) are a signature of J=0/J=2 interference is not yet fully established because the convergence analysis in Sec. III B validates only the total probabilities P^(J) at t = 0+, not the time- and hyperradius-resolved observable ⟨cos²β⟩(ρ,t). This observable is a ratio of integrals (Eq. 50) involving time- and ρ-dependent phases, so its convergence can differ from that of total probabilities. The retained J=4 component carries 2.5% probability (Table I); the J=2–J=4 cross-term amplitude is estimated as sqrt(0.1334×0.0246) ≈ 0.057, about 17% of the J=0–J=2 amplitude sqrt(0.8373×0.1334) ≈ 0.334, and the G coefficients in Eq. (54) are not reported. The reduced two-channel calculation used for Fig. 8 is an interpretive model, not a convergence check. The authors should provide a direct comparison of ⟨cos²β⟩(ρ,t) computed within the full basis (J=0,2,4) and with Jmax=6 (or with varied nmax/mmax), and should quantify the agreement between Figs. 7(a) and 8 (e.g., a difference map or mean absolute deviation) to support the stated 'semi-quantitative' reproduction.
  2. [Sec. II B, Eq. (19)] The delta-function pulse approximation, which defines the entire initial wave packet at t = 0+ and therefore all subsequent dynamics, is benchmarked for the helium dimer in Ref. [36] but not for the trimer. The trimer is more compact and more strongly bound than the dimer (Sec. II A), so the short-pulse criterion may have different margins. Since the paper explicitly defers an explicit Gaussian-pulse treatment to future work, the authors should provide a quantitative estimate of the error introduced by the delta-function model for the trimer, for example by comparing a short Gaussian pulse (with the same area) in a representative case, or by citing a trimer-specific validation. This point is load-bearing because the phase φ(ρ,θ,ϕ,β,γ,0+) in Eq. (21) and the resulting J populations underpin all reported observables.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (52)] The typeset formula for ⟨cos²β⟩(ρ,t) appears to be missing the normalization denominator; as printed, the second term lacks the division by the total hyperradius-resolved probability density (compare with the two-channel expression in Eq. (60)). Please correct.
  2. [Throughout (Sec. III and Sec. V)] There is an inconsistency in the pulse duration: Sec. III A, Table I, and Table III use τ = 331 fs, while Sec. III B and Sec. V refer to τ = 311 fs. Please ensure a single value is used consistently, or state that the results depend only on the pulse area and that the two values are equivalent.
  3. [Sec. VI and supplemental material] The citation to the supplemental material contains the placeholder 'to-be-inserted-by-editors'; this must be replaced with the actual URL or reference before publication.
  4. [Appendix B, Fig. 10(a)] The scaling factor of 10,000 used in the dimer-based model is introduced without physical motivation; a brief explanation of the choice or a sensitivity study would help the reader judge the robustness of the qualitative agreement.
  5. [Sec. IV, Eq. (48)] The normalization of P^(0,scatt)(KER,t) is not explicitly stated; please clarify how the scattering component is normalized relative to the total wave packet.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the full trimer dynamics is computed from stated first-principles inputs; the dimer-based model is explicitly approximate with a declared scaling factor.

full rationale

The central trimer result is not circular. The initial wave packet at t=0+ is built by applying the phase factor exp[iφ] (Eqs. (20)-(22)) to an independently computed trimer ground state, and the subsequent propagation uses the field-free trimer Hamiltonian with the Cencek et al. He-He potential (Eqs. (2), (33)-(34)). No trimer observable is fed back into the propagation. The finger-like alignment pattern is read off the computed ⟨cos²β⟩(ρ,t) and interpreted through the exact partial-wave expression Eq. (52); the two-channel reduction Eq. (60) is a post-processing projection of the full propagated wave packet, not a fit, so the attribution to J=0/J=2 interference is a numerical decomposition rather than an assumption built into the dynamics. The dimer-based model of Appendix B is explicitly labeled an approximate, qualitatively motivated model with one free scaling factor; the paper does not present it as a first-principles derivation of the trimer result, so its use of dimer dynamics as input is not a disguised prediction. The δ-function pulse approximation is a stated limitation benchmarked for the dimer in Ref. [36], an experimental work; applying it to the trimer is an acknowledged assumption, with Gaussian-pulse treatment deferred to future work. The convergence analysis validates P^(J) at t=0+ but not the differential alignment signal; this is a numerical-accuracy concern (including possible J=2/J=4 cross-term contributions) rather than a circularity. Minor self-citations (Refs. [36,37]) are used for the laser model but are either externally benchmarked or not load-bearing to the central derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central computation uses a well-established Hamiltonian and a documented potential; the main additions are the delta-function laser kick and the dimer-based model, which introduces one scaling parameter. No new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • scaling factor in dimer model = 10,000
    Appendix B; the overall amplitude of the dimer-derived signal is scaled to match the trimer signal, affecting the normalization of Fig. 10(a).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Three-body polarizability contributions are negligible, so the laser-trimer interaction is a sum of pairwise laser-dimer terms.
    Sec. II A, Eqs. (12)-(14); supported by Ref. [70] which finds them two orders of magnitude smaller.
  • ad hoc to paper The laser pulse can be modeled as a delta-function in time with matched area.
    Sec. II B, Eq. (19); benchmarked for dimer in Ref. [36].
  • ad hoc to paper In the dimer model, the trimer ground state is approximated by a Jastrow product of dimer ground state functions.
    Appendix B, Eqs. (B13)-(B14); the authors note this gives a poor description of the trimer ground state but similar short-range behavior.
  • domain assumption The initial state is the field-free trimer ground state.
    Sec. II B, Eq. (16); appropriate for a cold molecular beam.
  • domain assumption The Born-Oppenheimer He-He potential from Ref. [21] accurately describes the interaction.
    Sec. II A, Eq. (3); this is a standard empirical input from prior literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modeling the laser-pulse induced helium trimer dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/43HQOD7M

@misc{pith2026250204031,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modeling the laser-pulse induced helium trimer dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/43HQOD7M}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04031}
}
read the original abstract

Motivated by ongoing pump-probe spectroscopy experiments, this work develops a theoretical framework for describing the rovibrational wave packet dynamics that ensues when a single weakly-bound van der Waals trimer is exposed to a short, sub-picosecond linearly polarized pump laser pulse. The intensity I of the pump laser is chosen such that excitation and ionization of the electronic degrees of freedom are negligible while excitation of the wavepacket in the nuclear degrees of freedom is non-negligible. The numerical treatment, which takes advantage of the fact that the laser pulse is very short compared to typical molecular time scales, is based on a wave packet decomposition that utilizes hyperspherical coordinates. The framework is applied to the extremely floppy bosonic helium trimer. A convergence analysis of the partial wave decomposition is conducted. The kinetic energy release and orientation dynamics are presented. While the dynamics of more strongly-bound van der Waals trimers such as, e.g., the argon trimer display negligible coupling between vibrational and rotational degrees of freedom, rendering a description within a rigid-body picture appropriate, those of weakly-bound trimers display non-negligible coupling between vibrational and rotational degrees of freedom, rendering a description within a rigid-body picture inappropriate. It is shown that a model that constructs the helium trimer dynamics from the dynamics of the helium dimer captures a number of key characteristics of the alignment signal, including the interference between different angular momentum wave packet components.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04031 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Solid and dashed lines show the pair distribution func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) shows the real part of exp[ıφ(ρ, θ, ϕ, β, γ, 0 +)] as functions of θ and ρ for ϕ = π/12, β = 0, and γ = 0. Since the phase approaches zero for large ρ, the real part of the exponential approaches one. For smaller ρ (ρ ≲ 20 a.u.), the real part of the exponen￾tial displays highly oscillatory behavior. To understand the relevance of these oscillations, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Convergence analysis of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Dynamics of internuclear distances. The black [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Snapshot at (a) 5 ps and (b) 40 ps of the trimer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Averaged orientational dynamics. The black circles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Hyperradius-resolved dynamics of the trimer orien [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Internuclear distance-resolved dynamics of the trimer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Alignment signal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Trimer dynamics based on dimer input. (a) Expec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Analysis of kinetic energy release. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [37]

    Kruse et al., manuscript in preparation

    J. Kruse et al., manuscript in preparation

  2. [36]

    Kunitski, Q

    M. Kunitski, Q. Guan, H. Maschkiwitz, J. Hahnen- bruch, S. Eckart, S. Zeller, A. Kalinin, M. Sch¨ offler, L. Ph. H. Schmidt, T. Jahnke, D. Blume, and R. D¨ orner, Ultrafast manipulation of the weakly bound helium dimer, Nature Physics 17, 174–178 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-01081-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-020-01081-3 2021

  3. [1]

    V. R. Pandharipande, J. G. Zabolitzky, S. C. Pieper, R. B. Wiringa, and U. Helmbrecht, Calculations of Ground-State Properties of Liquid 4He Droplets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1676 (1983), URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.1676

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.50.1676 1983

  4. [2]

    M. V. Rama Krishna and K. B. Whaley, Microscopic studies of collective spectra of quantum liquid clus- ters, The Journal of Chemical Physics 93, 746 (1990), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.459525, URL https://doi. org/10.1063/1.459525

    work page doi:10.1063/1.459525 1990

  5. [3]

    Grebenev, J

    S. Grebenev, J. P. Toennies, and A. F. Vilesov, Superflu- idity Within a Small Helium-4 Cluster: The Microscopic Andronikashvili Experiment, Science 279, 2083 (1998), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.279.5359.2083, URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/ science.279.5359.2083

    work page arXiv 1998

  6. [4]

    J. P. Toennies and A. F. Vilesov, Superfluid He- lium Droplets: A Uniquely Cold Nanomatrix for Molecules and Molecular Complexes, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 43, 2622 (2004), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/anie.200300611, URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10. 1002/anie.200300611

    doi:10.1002/anie.200300611 2004

  7. [5]

    Y. Kwon, P. Huang, M. V. Patel, D. Blume, and K. B. Whaley, Quantum solvation and molec- ular rotations in superfluid helium clusters, The Journal of Chemical Physics 113, 6469 (2000), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1310608, URL https://doi. org/10.1063/1.1310608

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1310608 2000

  8. [6]

    Bressanini and G

    D. Bressanini and G. Morosi, What Is the Shape of the Helium Trimer? A Comparison with the Neon and Ar- gon Trimers, J. Phys. Chem. A115, 10880–10887 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp206612j

    work page doi:10.1021/jp206612j 2011

Show all 89 references
  1. [7]

    Blume and C

    D. Blume and C. H. Greene, Vibrationally excited states and fragmentation geometries of Ne N and Ar N clusters, N = 3 − 6, using hyperspherical co- ordinates, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 4242–4249 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1288385

    2000 doi

  2. [8]

    S. W. Rick, D. L. Lynch, and J. D. Doll, A varia- tional Monte Carlo study of argon, neon, and helium clusters, The Journal of Chemical Physics 95, 3506 (1991), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.460853, URL https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.460853

    1991 doi

  3. [9]

    J. P. Toennies, A. F. Vilesov, and K. B. Wha- ley, Superfluid Helium Droplets: An Ultra- cold Nanolaboratory, Physics Today 54, 31 (2001), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1359707, URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1359707

    2001 doi

  4. [10]

    Stienkemeier and K

    F. Stienkemeier and K. K. Lehmann, Spectroscopy and dynamics in helium nanodroplets, Journal of Physics B: 20 Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 39, R127 (2006), URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/39/8/r01

    2006 doi

  5. [11]

    Callegari, K

    C. Callegari, K. K. Lehmann, R. Schmied, and G. Scoles, Helium nanodroplet isolation rovibra- tional spectroscopy: Methods and recent results, The Journal of Chemical Physics 115, 10090 (2001), https://aip.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1063/1.1418746, URL https://aip.scitation.org/...

    2001 doi

  6. [12]

    J. P. Toennies and A. F. Vilesov, Spectroscopy of atoms and molecules in liquid helium, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 49, 1 (1998), pMID: 15012423, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physchem.49.1.1, URL https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physchem.49.1.1

    1998 doi

  7. [13]

    Conus, J

    F. Conus, J. T. Lau, V. Rodrigues, and C. F´ elix, High sensitivity absorption measurement of small metal clusters embedded in an argon matrix, argon matrix spectroscopy, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 77, 113103 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2369640

    2006 doi

  8. [14]

    M. Harb, F. Rabilloud, D. Simon, A. Rydlo; S. Lecoultre, F. Conus, V. Rodrigues, and C. F´ elix, Optical absorption of small silver clusters: Agn, (n = 4−22), J. Chem. Phys. 129, 194108 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3013557

    2008 doi

  9. [15]

    de Boer, Quantum theory of condensed permanent gases I the law of corresponding states, Physica (Am- sterdam)14, 139 (1948)

    J. de Boer, Quantum theory of condensed permanent gases I the law of corresponding states, Physica (Am- sterdam)14, 139 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1016/0031- 8914(48)90032-9

    1948 doi

  10. [16]

    de Boer and B

    J. de Boer and B. S. Blaisse, Quantum theory of con- densed permanent gases II the solid state and the melting line, Physica (Amsterdam) 14, 149 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-8914(48)90033-0

    1948 doi

  11. [17]

    M. B. Sevryuk, J. P. Toennies, and D. M. Ceperley, Why are para-hydrogen clusters superfluid? A quantum theo- rem of corresponding states study, J. Chem. Phys. 133, 064505 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3458640

    2010 doi

  12. [18]

    R. A. Aziz, V. P. S. Nain, J. S. Carley, W. L. Taylor, and G. T. McConville, An accurate intermolecular potential for helium, The Journal of Chemical Physics 70, 4330 (1979), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.438007, URL https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.438007

    1979 doi

  13. [19]

    A. R. Janzen and R. A. Aziz, The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics 103, 9626 (1995), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.469978, URL https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.469978

    1995 doi

  14. [20]

    R. A. Aziz and M. J. Slaman, Modern He-He po- tentials: Another look at binding energy, effec- tive range theory, retardation, and Efimov states, The Journal of Chemical Physics 94, 8047 (1991), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.460139, URL https://doi. org/10.1063/1.460139

    1991 doi

  15. [21]

    Cencek, M

    W. Cencek, M. Przybytek, J. Komasa, J. B. Mehl, B. Jeziorski, and K. Szalewicz, Effects of adiabatic, rel- ativistic, and quantum electrodynamics interactions on the pair potential and thermophysical properties of he- lium, The Journal of Chemical Physics 136, 224303 (2012), h...

    2012 doi

  16. [22]

    Przybytek, W

    M. Przybytek, W. Cencek, J. Komasa, G. Lach, B. Jeziorski, and K. Szalewicz, Relativistic and Quan- tum Electrodynamics Effects in the Helium Pair Poten- tial, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 183003 (2010), URL https:// link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.183003

    2010 doi

  17. [23]

    Braaten and H.-W

    E. Braaten and H.-W. Hammer, Universality in few- body systems with large scattering length, Physics Reports 428, 259 (2006), ISSN 0370-1573, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0370157306000822

    2006

  18. [24]

    Braaten and H.-W

    E. Braaten and H.-W. Hammer, Efimov physics in cold atoms, Annals of Physics 322, 120 (2007), ISSN 0003-4916, january Special Issue 2007, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0003491606002387

    2007

  19. [25]

    C. H. Greene, P. Giannakeas, and J. P´ erez- R ´ ıos, Universal few-body physics and cluster formation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035006 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035006

    2017 doi

  20. [26]

    Naidon and S

    P. Naidon and S. Endo, Efimov physics: a review, Re- ports on Progress in Physics 80, 056001 (2017), URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aa50e8

    2017 doi

  21. [27]

    Efimov, Energy levels arising from resonant two-body forces in a three-body system, Phys

    V. Efimov, Energy levels arising from resonant two-body forces in a three-body system, Phys. Lett. B 33, 563 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(70)90349-7

    1970 doi

  22. [28]

    Sisourat, N

    N. Sisourat, N. V. Kryzhevoi, P. Koloren˘ c, S. Scheit, T. Jahnke, and L. S. Cederbaum, Ultralong-range en- ergy transfer by interatomic Coulombic decay in an ex- treme quantum system, Nature Phys. 6, 508 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1685

    2010 doi

  23. [29]

    Titze1, H

    J. Titze1, H. Sann, M. K¨ uhnel, J. Voigtsberger, J. H. Mo- rilla, W. Sch¨ ollkopf, H. Schmidt-B¨ ocking, R. E. Grisenti, and R. D¨ orner, Interatomic Coulombic Decay following Photoionization of the Helium Dimer: Observation of Vi- brational Structure, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 13...

    2010 doi

  24. [30]

    Goihl, P

    C. Goihl, P. Burzynski, F. Wiegandt, T. Bauer, R. Wallauer, H. Sann, A. Kalinin, L. Ph. H. Schmidt, M. Sch¨ offler, N. Sisourat, and T. Jahnke, Evolution of Interatomic Coulombic Decay in the Time Domain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 093401 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett...

    2013 doi

  25. [31]

    Q. Wei, S. Kais, T. Yasuike, and D. Herschbach, Pendular alignment and strong chemical binding are induced in he- lium dimer molecules by intense laser fields, PNAS 115, E9058 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810102115

    2018 doi

  26. [32]

    Friedrich, M

    B. Friedrich, M. Gupta, and D. Herschbach, Probing Weakly-Bound Species with Nonresonant Light: Dissoci- ation of He 2 Induced by Rotational Hybridization, Col- lect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 63, 1089 (1998)

    1998

  27. [33]

    Nielsen, D

    E. Nielsen, D. V. Fedorov, and A. S. Jensen, Efimov States in External Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2844 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2844

    1999 doi

  28. [34]

    L. W. Bruch, Electric field effects on the he- lium dimer, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 9773 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.481614

    2000 doi

  29. [35]

    Guan and D

    Q. Guan and D. Blume, Electric-field-induced helium- helium resonances, Phys. Rev. A 99, 033416 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.033416

    2019 doi

  30. [38]

    Ullrich, R

    J. Ullrich, R. Moshammer, R. D¨ orner, O. Jagutzki, V. Mergel, H. Schmidt-B¨ ocking, and L. Spielberger, Recoil- ion momentum spectroscopy, J. Phys. B 30, 2917 (1997). DOI 10.1088/0953-4075/30/13/006

    1997 doi

  31. [39]

    Ulrich, A

    B. Ulrich, A. Vredenborg, A. Malakzadeh, L. P. H. 21 Schmidt, T. Havermeier, M. Meckel, K. Cole, M. Smo- larski, Z. Chang, T. Jahnke, and R. D¨ orner, Imaging of the Structure of the Argon and Neon Dimer, Trimer, and Tetramer, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 115, 6936 (201...

    2011 doi

  32. [40]

    Kazandjian, J

    S. Kazandjian, J. Rist, M. Weller, F. Wiegandt, D. Aslit¨ urk, S. Grundmann, M. Kircher, G. Nalin, D. Pitters, I. Vela P´ erez, et al., Frustrated Coulomb explosion of small helium clusters, Phys. Rev. A 98, 050701 (2018), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevA.98.050701

    2018

  33. [41]

    Stapelfeldt and T

    H. Stapelfeldt and T. Seideman, Collo- quium: Aligning molecules with strong laser pulses, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 543 (2003). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.543

    2003 doi

  34. [42]

    C. P. Koch, M. Lemeshko, and D. Sugny, Quantum control of molecular rotation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 035005 (2019). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.91.035005

    2019 doi

  35. [43]

    J. Floß, A. Kamalov, I. Sh. Averbukh, and P. H. Bucksbaum, Observation of Bloch Oscillations in Molec- ular Rotation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 203002 (2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.203002

    2015 doi

  36. [44]

    K. Lin, I. Tutunnikov, J. Ma, J. Qiang, L. Zhou, O. Faucher, Y. Prior, I. Sh. Averbukh, and J. Wu, Spatiotemporal rotational dynamics of laser-driven molecules, Advanced Photonics 2, 024002 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.AP.2.2.024002

    2020 doi

  37. [45]

    The kinetic energy operator Tcm of the center-of-mass degrees of freedom reads Tcm = −ℏ2 2Mtot ∂2 ∂ ⃗R2cm , (B15) with Mtot and ⃗Rcm denoting the total mass and center- of-mass vector, respectively, Mtot = 3µ and ⃗Rcm = (⃗ r1 + ⃗ r2 + ⃗ r3)/3

  38. [46]

    R. C. Whitten and F. T. Smith, Symmetric Rep- resentation for Three-Body Problems. II. Mo- tion in Space, J. Math. Phys. 9, 1103 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1664683

    1968 doi

  39. [47]

    B. R. Johnson, On hyperspherical coordinates and mapping the internal configurations of a three body system, J. Chem. Phys. 73, 5051 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.439983

    1980 doi

  40. [48]

    B. K. Kendrick, R. T. Pack, R. B. Walker, and E. F. Hayes, Hyperspherical surface functions for nonzero total angular momentum. I. Eckart singularities, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 6673 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.478574

    1999 doi

  41. [49]

    R. T. Pack and G. A. Parker, Quantum reactive scat- tering in three dimensions using hyperspherical (APH) coordinates. Theory, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 3888 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.452944

    1987 doi

  42. [50]

    H. Suno, B. D. Esry, C. H. Greene, and J. P. Burke, Three-body recombination of cold he- lium atoms, Phys. Rev. A 65, 042725 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.042725

    2002 doi

  43. [51]

    Suno and B

    H. Suno and B. D. Esry, Adiabatic hyperspherical study of triatomic helium systems, Phys. Rev. A 78, 062701 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.062701

    2008 doi

  44. [52]

    Blume, C

    D. Blume, C. H. Greene, and B. D. Esry, Comparative study of He 3, Ne 3, and Ar 3 using hyperspherical co- ordinates, The Journal of Chemical Physics 113, 2145 (2000), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.482027, URL https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.482027

    2000 doi

  45. [53]

    A. D. Buckingham and R. S. Watts, The polarizabil- ity of a pair of helium atoms, Mol. Phys. 26, 7 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1080/00268977300101331

    1973 doi

  46. [54]

    Cencek, J

    W. Cencek, J. Komasa, and K. Szalewicz, Collision- induced dipole polarizability of helium dimer from explic- itly correlated calculations J. Chem. Phys. 135, 014301 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3603968

    2011 doi

  47. [55]

    Friedrich and D

    B. Friedrich and D. Herschbach, Alignment and Trapping of Molecules in Intense Laser Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4623 (1995). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4623

    1995 doi

  48. [56]

    Spott, A

    A. Spott, A. Jaron-Becker, and A. Becker, Time- dependent susceptibility of a helium atom in in- tense laser pulses, Phys. Rev. A 96, 053404 (2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.053404

    2017 doi

  49. [57]

    N. B. Delone and V. P. Krainov, Tunneling and barrier-suppression ionization of atoms and ions in a laser radiation field, Phys.-Usp. 41, 469 (1998). DOI: 10.1070/PU1998v041n05ABEH000393

    1998 doi

  50. [58]

    Voigtsberger, S

    J. Voigtsberger, S. Zeller, J. Becht, N. Neumann, F. Sturm, H.-K. Kim, M. Waitz, F. Trinter, M. Ku- nitski, A. Kalinin, et al., Imaging the structure of the trimer systems 4He3 and 3He4He2, Nature Communi- cations 5, 5765 (2014), ISSN 2041-1723, URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6765

    2014 doi

  51. [59]

    Kunitski, S

    M. Kunitski, S. Zeller, J. Voigtsberger, A. Kalinin, L. P. H. Schmidt, M. Sch¨ offler, A. Czasch, W. Sch¨ ollkopf, R. E. Grisenti, T. Jahnke, et al., Observation of the Efi- mov state of the helium trimer, Science 348, 551 (2015), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/scienc...

    2015 doi

  52. [60]

    Zeller, M

    S. Zeller, M. Kunitski, J. Voigtsberger, A. Kalinin, A. Schottelius, C. Schober, M. Waitz, H. Sann, A. Hartung, T. Bauer, et al., Imaging the He2 quantum halo state using a free electron laser, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, 14651 (2016), ISSN 0027-8424, ...

    2016

  53. [61]

    Hiyama and M

    E. Hiyama and M. Kamimura, Linear correlations be- tween 4He trimer and tetramer energies calculated with various realistic 4He potentials, Phys. Rev. A 85, 062505 (2012), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.062505

    2012 doi

  54. [62]

    A. J. Yates and D. Blume, Structural properties of 4HeN (N = 2−10) clusters for different potential models at the physical point and at unitarity. Phys. Rev. A105, 022824 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.105.022824

    2022 doi

  55. [63]

    T. G. Lee, B. D. Esry, B.-C. Gou, and C. D. Lin, The helium trimer has no bound rotational excited states, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 34, L203 (2001). DOI 10.1088/0953-4075/34/7/101

    2001 doi

  56. [64]

    T. K. Lim, S. K. Duffy, and W. C. Damer, Efi- mov State in the 4He Trimer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 341 (1977), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.38.341

    1977

  57. [65]

    Cornelius and W

    T. Cornelius and W. Gl¨ ockle, Efimov states for three 4He atoms?, The Journal of Chemical Physics 85, 3906 (1986), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.450912, URL https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.450912. 22

    1986 doi

  58. [66]

    Nielsen, D

    E. Nielsen, D. V. Fedorov, and A. S. Jensen, The struc- ture of the atomic helium trimers: halos and Efimov states, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Op- tical Physics 31, 4085 (1998), URL https://doi.org/ 10.1088/0953-4075/31/18/008

    1998 doi

  59. [67]

    D. Blume, Efimov Physics and the Three-Body Param- eter for Shallow van der Waals Potentials, Few-Body Systems 56, 859 (2015), ISSN 1432-5411, URL https: //doi.org/10.1007/s00601-015-0996-6

    2015 doi

  60. [68]

    E. A. Kolganova, A. K. Motovilov, and W. Sandhas, The 4He Trimer as an Efimov System, Few-Body Systems51, 249 (2011), ISSN 1432-5411, URL https://doi.org/10. 1007/s00601-011-0233-x

    2011

  61. [69]

    B. D. Esry, C. D. Lin, and C. H. Greene, Adiabatic hy- perspherical study of the helium trimer, Phys. Rev. A54, 394 (1996), URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevA.54.394

    1996

  62. [70]

    J. Lang, M. Przybytek, M. Lesiuk, and B. Jeziorski, Collision-induced three-body polarizabil- ity of helium, J. Chem. Phys. 158, 114303 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0137879

    2023 doi

  63. [71]

    A. D. Buckingham and I. D. Hands, The three- body contribution to the polarizability of a trimer of inert gas atoms using a dipole—induced- dipole model, Chem. Phys. Lett. 185, 544 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(91)80257-X

    1991 doi

  64. [72]

    Li and K

    X. Li and K. L. C. Hunt, Nonadditive three-body dipoles of inert gas trimers and H 2 · · ·H2 · · ·H2: Long-range ef- fects in far infrared absorption and triple vibrational transitions, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 4133–4153 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.474790

    1997 doi

  65. [73]

    Goldstein, C

    H. Goldstein, C. Poole, and J. Safko, Classical Mechan- ics, 3rd Edition, Pearson

  66. [74]

    R. N. Zare, Angular Momentum: Understanding Spatial Aspects in Chemistry and Physics, 1st Edition, Wiley- Interscience

  67. [75]

    Blume, Few-body physics with ultracold atomic and molecular systems in traps, Rep

    D. Blume, Few-body physics with ultracold atomic and molecular systems in traps, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75 046401 (2012). DOI 10.1088/0034-4885/75/4/046401

    2012 doi

  68. [76]

    J. P. D’Incao, Few-body physics in resonantly interacting ultracold quantum gases, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 51, 043001 (2018), URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6455/aaa116

    2018 doi

  69. [77]

    B. D. Esry, C. H. Greene, and J. P. Burke, Jr., Recombination of Three Atoms in the Ul- tracold Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1751 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1751

    1999 doi

  70. [78]

    T. H. Ezer and R. Kosloff, An accurate and ef- fcient scheme for propagating the time dependent Schr¨ odinger equation, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3967 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.448136

    1984 doi

  71. [79]

    This implies that our re- sults also apply to pulse lengths and intensities for which τ → aτ and I → a−1I, where a is a real number

    It should be noted that the results only depend on the area under the Gaussian pulse. This implies that our re- sults also apply to pulse lengths and intensities for which τ → aτ and I → a−1I, where a is a real number. The laser intensity I is related to ϵ via I = ϵ0cϵ2/2, whe...

  72. [80]

    C. A. Schouder, A. S. Chatterley, J. D. Pickering, and H. Stapelfeldt, Laser-Induced Coulomb Explo- sion Imaging of Aligned Molecules and Molecular Dimers, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 73, 323 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-090419- 053627

    2022 doi

  73. [81]

    Metropolis, A

    N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosen- bluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines, The Journal of Chemical Physics 21, 1087 (1953), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114, URL https://doi. org/10.1063/1.1699114

    1953 doi

  74. [82]

    The time scale is estimated using (time scale) = 2πℏ/(energy scale)

  75. [83]

    The supplemental material at to-be-inserted-by-editors consists of a movie (100 frames, corresponding to de- lay times of 0 .5 ps, 1 ps, · · ·, 50 ps), which shows the time evolution of the helium trimer using the moments- of-inertia axes based representation introduced in Nie...

  76. [84]

    Chen and X

    Y. Chen and X. Cui, Ultrastable Super-Tonks- Girardeau Gases under Weak Dipolar Interac- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 203002 (2023). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.203002

    2023 doi

  77. [85]

    Levinsen, P

    J. Levinsen, P. Massignan, S. Endo, and M. M. Parish, Universality of the unitary Fermi gas: a few-body per- spective, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 50, 072001 (2017). DOI 10.1088/1361-6455/aa5a1e

    2017 doi

  78. [86]

    S. Tan, Generalized virial theorem and pressure re- lation for a strongly correlated Fermi gas, An- nals of Physics 323, 2987 (2008), ISSN 0003- 4916, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0003491608000420

    2008

  79. [87]

    Tan, Large momentum part of a strongly corre- lated Fermi gas, Annals of Physics 323, 2971 (2008), ISSN 0003-4916, URL https://www.sciencedirect

    S. Tan, Large momentum part of a strongly corre- lated Fermi gas, Annals of Physics 323, 2971 (2008), ISSN 0003-4916, URL https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0003491608000432

    2008

  80. [88]

    Tan, Energetics of a strongly correlated Fermi gas, Annals of Physics 323, 2952 (2008), ISSN 0003- 4916, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0003491608000456

    S. Tan, Energetics of a strongly correlated Fermi gas, Annals of Physics 323, 2952 (2008), ISSN 0003- 4916, URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0003491608000456

    2008

  81. [89]

    Bazak, M

    B. Bazak, M. Valiente, and N. Barnea, Universal short- range correlations in bosonic helium clusters, Phys. Rev. A 101, 010501 (2020), URL https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.101.010501

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.