Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Phenomenology of $\tau^- \rightarrow \pi^- \nu_{\tau} \gamma$ using LCSR

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.00549 v2 pith:43LXVKSR submitted 2020-10-01 hep-ph hep-ex

classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords formdecaygammafactorsconedependentlightradiative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We present the study of radiative tau decay ($\tau^- \rightarrow \pi^- \nu_\tau \gamma$), computing the structure dependent contribution using Light Cone Sum Rules. This decay includes the same form factors as the radiative pion decay with the crucial difference that the momentum transfer squared, $t$, between the pion-photon system is positive, which makes these form factors timelike and also as $t$ can now take values upto $m_\tau^2$ , it can produce real hadronic resonances. The analytical form for these form factors has been calculated using light cone sum rules method and the invariant mass-spectrum in the $\pi-\gamma$ system and the decay width are presented. The structure dependent parameter, $\gamma$, the ratio of the axial to vector form factor is found to be in good agreement with the experimental determination.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Comment on "Radiative corrections to tau -> pi(K) nu_tau[gamma]: A reliable new physics test"

    hep-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    The GR10–DF axial dictionary entry has the wrong sign, so GR10 carries the wrong vector sign versus the anomaly; δr_SD moves from +0.150% to +0.146% (π) and ~+0.16% (K).

  2. Comment on "Radiative corrections to tau -> pi(K) nu_tau[gamma]: A reliable new physics test"

    hep-ph 2026-07 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    The GR10–DF dictionary has the wrong axial sign, so GR10 matches the chiral axial prediction but opposes the anomaly in the vector sector; the numerical shift in δr_SD is tiny (−0.004% for pions).

Pith tools