Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Auctioning Corporate Bonds: A Uniform-Price under Investment Mandates

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.07134 v1 pith:43ODYLET submitted 2023-06-12 econ.GN q-fin.EC

Auctioning Corporate Bonds: A Uniform-Price under Investment Mandates

classification econ.GN q-fin.EC
keywords corporateequilibriumbondsinvestmentmandatesriskaffectauction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper examines how risk and budget limits on investment mandates affect the bidding strategy in a uniform-price auction for issuing corporate bonds. I prove the existence of symmetric Bayesian Nash equilibrium and explore how the risk limits imposed on the mandate may mitigate severe underpricing, as the symmetric equilibrium's yield positively relates to the risk limit. Investment mandates with low-risk acceptance inversely affect the equilibrium bid. The equilibrium bid provides insights into the optimal mechanism for pricing corporate bonds conveying information about the bond's valuation, market power, and the number of bidders. These findings contribute to auction theory and have implications for empirical research in the corporate bond market.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Liquidity Premium and Investment Horizons

    econ.EM 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Order-flow estimates of Kyle lambda predict stock returns and resolve the Constantinides liquidity premium puzzle through an adverse-selection channel without risk compensation.