REVIEW 1 cited by
Auctioning Corporate Bonds: A Uniform-Price under Investment Mandates
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Auctioning Corporate Bonds: A Uniform-Price under Investment Mandates
read the original abstract
This paper examines how risk and budget limits on investment mandates affect the bidding strategy in a uniform-price auction for issuing corporate bonds. I prove the existence of symmetric Bayesian Nash equilibrium and explore how the risk limits imposed on the mandate may mitigate severe underpricing, as the symmetric equilibrium's yield positively relates to the risk limit. Investment mandates with low-risk acceptance inversely affect the equilibrium bid. The equilibrium bid provides insights into the optimal mechanism for pricing corporate bonds conveying information about the bond's valuation, market power, and the number of bidders. These findings contribute to auction theory and have implications for empirical research in the corporate bond market.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Liquidity Premium and Investment Horizons
Order-flow estimates of Kyle lambda predict stock returns and resolve the Constantinides liquidity premium puzzle through an adverse-selection channel without risk compensation.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.