Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 56 references

This paper identifies a linear instability in magnetized plasmas driven by a current proportional to the charge chemical potential times the bulk velocity, with a maximum growth rate confirmed by direct numerical simulation to within a few

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 04:22 UTC pith:45DYSHDE

load-bearing objection A clean linear-instability result with honest numerical confirmation, resting on an unpublished constitutive term and a closure the authors admit fails in the early-Universe regime; referee it, but insist on seeing the companion. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.22815 v1 pith:45DYSHDE submitted 2026-07-24 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.HEphysics.plasm-ph

A charge-flow instability in plasmas with charge fluctuations

Deepen Garg , Jennifer Schober This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO astro-ph.HEphysics.plasm-ph
keywords charge-flow instabilityplasma instabilitycharge chemical potentialchiral magnetohydrodynamicsmagnetic field amplificationlinear stability analysismagnetogenesisnon-Hermitian dispersion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that magnetized plasmas with charge fluctuations are subject to a linear instability driven by a current proportional to the product of the charge chemical potential μ and the bulk velocity v — a term missing from standard MHD and its chiral extensions. The authors derive the dispersion relation and show the maximum growth rate is |ω_i|max = C_flow k_μ |μ| B0 / 8 at unit magnetic Prandtl number and small background field, independent of resistivity. Direct numerical simulations confirm the growth rate to within a few percent with no free parameters, and show the instability operates even when μ has zero spatial mean. The instability requires a finite background magnetic field but no chiral asymmetry, no turbulence, and no net charge.

Core claim

The central claim is that the generalized Ohm's law for a one-fluid plasma with charge fluctuations contains a charge-flow term C_flow η k_μ μ v, coupling the induction equation to the velocity field. Linearizing around a uniform background field B0, this term makes the plasma linearly unstable for perturbations propagating parallel to B0, with maximum growth rate |ω_i|max = C_flow k_μ |μ| B0 / 8. The growth rate is independent of the magnetic diffusivity, although finite diffusivity is required for the term to act, and the instability persists for zero-mean chemical-potential fluctuations and at magnetic Prandtl number unity. In the nonlinear regime the one-fluid model gives no saturation;

What carries the argument

The key object is the C-flow term C_flow η k_μ μ v in the generalized Ohm's law: an electromotive force proportional to the charge chemical potential μ and the bulk velocity v. It enters the induction equation and, for perturbations along the background magnetic field, produces an imaginary contribution to the dispersion relation — the signature of a non-Hermitian linear operator — rendering one of the two magnetic helicities unstable. The derived dispersion relation (14) and its small-field limit (18) supply the growth rate, wavenumber, and parameter scaling that the simulations test.

Load-bearing premise

The result stands or falls on the unverified C-flow term in Ohm's law and the assumption that the electric field can be closed algebraically rather than treated dynamically; the authors note this closure fails for underdamped Langmuir oscillations, e.g., in the early Universe.

What would settle it

A kinetic or two-fluid simulation of a magnetized electron-positron plasma with a sinusoidal charge chemical potential, zero chiral asymmetry, and no turbulence: if magnetic energy does not grow exponentially at the wavenumber predicted by Eq. (16) with rate (18), the C-flow instability as described does not survive.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Any chiral MHD calculation that keeps μ ≠ 0 but omits this term may miss a dominant instability; existing results in that regime may need revisiting.
  • The instability offers a magnetic-field amplification channel that does not rely on the chiral magnetic effect, turbulence, or a net chirality.
  • Because the growth rate is independent of resistivity, the instability survives in the low-diffusivity limit relevant to many astrophysical plasmas.
  • The absence of saturation in the one-fluid model implies that predictions in the nonlinear regime are qualitative until a two-fluid treatment is developed.
  • The driving current can exceed the chiral vortical current and approach the chiral magnetic current when μ ≈ μ5 and B and v are in equipartition, so the effect matters wherever chiral MHD is applied.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The algebraic closure for the electric field is the most likely point of failure; a two-fluid or kinetic simulation that retains the displacement current would either confirm Eq. (18) or reveal a significantly modified growth rate.
  • If the C-flow term is real, other transport coefficients proportional to μ may also have been systematically dropped from MHD descriptions of non-neutral plasmas, suggesting a broader family of charge-flow effects.
  • The instability's independence from turbulence places it in the same class as laminar dynamos; it could be probed in controlled laboratory plasmas with externally imposed charge-density waves.
  • The authors expect Langmuir damping to deplete μ and mitigate the runaway; testing this requires a two-fluid model that has not yet been built, so the end state of the instability is genuinely open.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a new linear instability, the 'charge-flow' (C-flow) instability, in one-fluid magnetohydrodynamics with a charge chemical potential μ. The instability is driven by an electromotive force proportional to μ v in Ohm's law, Eq. (5), a term taken from the authors' companion paper [29]. The authors linearize the reduced equations, derive the dispersion relation (14), and obtain the maximum growth rate (18) at small B0 and unit magnetic Prandtl number. They verify the growth rate and its parameter scaling in Pencil Code simulations (Figs. 1–2), including a zero-mean μ run (Fig. 3). They also discuss the absence of saturation, explicitly noting that the one-fluid algebraic closure fails for underdamped Langmuir oscillations (e.g., in the early Universe) and that a two-fluid treatment is deferred.

Significance. If the C-flow term is physically correct, the instability would be a genuinely new ingredient for chiral-MHD applications with nonzero μ, potentially relevant to early-Universe magnetogenesis and other charged-fermion plasmas. The manuscript's strengths are the transparent linear derivation, the parameter-free prediction of Eq. (18), and the careful simulation confirmation, with data and code made available on Zenodo. The parameter scans in Fig. 2 strongly support the predicted scaling. However, the physical foundation of the C-flow term is not self-contained—it resides in an unpublished companion paper—and the manuscript itself admits that the ohmic closure used in the derivation fails in a stated target regime. As it stands, the paper establishes a model-level instability with high internal consistency, but the physical plasma instability remains conditional on the companion derivation and on the closure caveats.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theoretical setup, Eq. (5)] The C-flow term C_flow η k_μ μ v in Ohm's law is introduced from the unpublished companion [29] with no derivation in this manuscript. Because this term is the sole driver of the instability, the simulations confirm only the internal consistency of the reduced model, not the physical existence of the term. To make the central claim load-bearing, the authors should either provide a self-contained derivation (e.g., from a two-fluid or kinetic reduction) or explicitly frame the instability as conditional on [29]. As written, the physical growth rate (18) is not independently verified.
  2. [Absence of saturation; Appendix A] The paper states that dropping the displacement current and closing E' algebraically in Eq. (5) is invalid for underdamped Langmuir oscillations (e.g., in the early Universe), and that a dynamical longitudinal electric field 'will couple directly to the instability, with the electrostatic energy of charge separation constraining the energy reservoir.' This admission directly affects the applicability of the linear dispersion relation (14) and the growth rate (18) in a stated target regime. The authors should either restrict the claims to overdamped regimes, or provide at least a heuristic argument that the instability survives a dynamical treatment of the electric field. As is, the central claim is only conditionally valid.
minor comments (4)
  1. [After Eq. (13)] The sentence 'both of which satisfy b^2 = 0, 1' is ambiguous for complex eigenmodes. For circular polarizations, typically b·b = 0 and |b|^2 is normalized to 1. Please clarify the notation.
  2. [Table I] The run-family notation is difficult to parse (e.g., 'A0,A1–A54,8−24 0.1 20 01'). Please reformat the table so each column is explicit and the parameter ranges are unambiguous.
  3. [Fig. 2 legend] Use subscripts for C_flow, μ_ampl, and k_μ in the legend text. The current plain-text formatting obscures which quantity is being varied.
  4. [Abstract and Summary] The phrase 'no free parameters' is somewhat overstated: the exponents m, n, p in Fig. 2 are fitted to the data, and the hyperdiffusivity D_μ is chosen for numerical stability. The agreement is strong, but a qualification would make the claim more precise.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

The instability lives entirely in the C-flow term imported from the authors' unpublished companion [29]; no derivation of the term is given, and the same self-cited one-fluid closure is admitted to fail in the target regime.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Theoretical setup, Eq. (5); Introduction]
    "The full chiral-MHD equations are derived in our companion paper [29, Eqs. (39)-(44)]. Following its conventions... 𝑬′ =−𝒗×𝑩 ′+𝜂(∇×𝑩 ′−𝑘 𝜇𝜇5 𝑩′−𝐶 flow𝑘𝜇𝜇𝒗)... This additional C-flow term is necessary whenever there is a deviation from quasineutrality, i.e., nonzero 𝜇... The C-flow instability arises from the last term in Eq. (5)."

    The instability is driven solely by the last term in Eq. (5), C_flow η k_mu μ v. The paper does not derive this term; it takes it from [29], an unpublished companion paper by the same authors, and the quoted 'necessary' status of the term is likewise from that companion. Because [29] is not available for inspection, the central claim that a physical plasma exhibits this instability reduces to accepting the self-cited constitutive term. If that term were absent or different, the dispersion relation and Eq. (18) would not follow from the equations shown.

  2. other [Absence of saturation]
    "This lack of a depletion mechanism is due to the MHD framework assumed in Ref. [29], where we drop the displacement current and close the electric field (5) algebraically rather than dynamically... The longitudinal electric field, if treated dynamically, will therefore couple directly to the instability, with the electrostatic energy of charge separation constraining the energy reservoir."

    This is an explicit, admitted limitation rather than a fully circular step, but it compounds the load-bearing self-citation: the governing equations, including the C-flow term, are inherited from [29], and the authors concede that the one-fluid algebraic closure is invalid for underdamped Langmuir oscillations (e.g., the early Universe). Thus the quoted growth rate Eq. (18) may not survive for the intended physical regimes, and the self-cited companion has not been independently validated.

full rationale

The linear analysis itself is internally consistent: Eqs. (9)-(18) follow from the assumed equations, k_max is obtained by setting ∂_k ω_i = 0, Eq. (18) is a small-B0 expansion, and the simulations compare measured growth rates to the formula without fitting free parameters, finding agreement to a few percent and the predicted power-law scaling. So there is no 'fitted input called prediction' circularity in the numerics. The circularity is at the constitutive level: the C-flow term in Eq. (5) — the sole driver of the instability — is imported from the authors' own unpublished companion paper [29], with no derivation in this Letter. The paper's 'Absence of saturation' section further concedes that the same [29]-inherited closure (algebraic E', dropped displacement current) fails for underdamped Langmuir oscillations and that a dynamical longitudinal E would couple to the instability, so Eq. (18) is not guaranteed in regimes like the early Universe. These are limitations, but they reinforce that the central physical claim rests on an unverified self-citation. Score 6 is appropriate rather than higher because the derivation and simulation of the assumed model are genuine, parameter-free, and self-consistent; the problem is that the model's key term has no independent public derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a model whose key term is inherited from an unpublished companion paper, and on an ohmic closure that the authors themselves identify as regime-dependent. The simulations confirm internal consistency but do not independently validate the C-flow term. The only fitted quantities are diagnostic power-law slopes and a numerical hyperdiffusivity.

free parameters (2)
  • power-law exponents m, n, p = m = 0.98 (R²=0.9997), n = 0.98 (R²=0.9994), p = 0.96 (R²=0.9976)
    Slopes of log γrms vs log C_flow, log μ, and log B0 fitted in Fig. 2; used to display agreement with predicted linear scaling, not as inputs to the growth-rate formula.
  • hyperdiffusivity D_μ = 7.5×10^-7
    Chosen so that at the Nyquist wavenumber the diffusion rate of μ equals the magnetic dissipation rate; a numerical stabilization choice, not a physical constant.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The C-flow current term C_flow η kμ μ v in Ohm's law (Eq. 5) is a correct macroscopic consequence of nonzero μ.
    Entered from companion paper [29]; no derivation is given in this Letter, yet every subsequent result depends on it.
  • domain assumption One-fluid approximation with algebraic closure of E′ (drop displacement current) and ohmic dissipation of charge is valid.
    Authors state this requires negligible electron inertia and instability timescale shorter than resistive timescale; they note it is invalid for underdamped Langmuir oscillations, e.g., in the early Universe.
  • domain assumption Small chemical potentials and velocities: μ², μ5², v² ≪ 1 (Eq. 1).
    Used to linearize and to neglect higher-order chiral/vortical terms.
  • domain assumption Isentropic equation of state p = cs² ρ.
    Used in the linearized momentum equation (Eq. 10); standard in this context but not derived here.
  • domain assumption Neglect of chiral vortical effect, chiral electric separation effect, and chirality-flipping term.
    Dropped from Appendix A under condition (A11) and small chemical potentials; some are argued negligible, others deferred.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 10643 in / 16460 out tokens · 165355 ms · 2026-08-01T04:22:31.618853+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a linear instability in magnetized plasmas with charge fluctuations. It is driven by an electric current proportional to the charge chemical potential $\mu$ and the bulk velocity. This charge-flow (C-flow) instability has hitherto not been considered in standard magnetohydrodynamics or its chiral extensions. We derive its dispersion relation and maximum growth rate, and confirm them with direct numerical simulations. We also show that the C-flow instability persists even for zero-mean fluctuations of $\mu$, vanishing resistivity, and a magnetic Prandtl number of unity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.22815 by Deepen Garg, Jennifer Schober.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Measured growth rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Spectral evolution of Run [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Time evolution of characteristic quantities for Run [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 7 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    S. L. Adler,Axial-vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics, Phys. Rev.177, 2426 (1969)

    1969

  2. [2]

    J. S. Bell and R. Jackiw,A PCAC puzzle:𝜋0→𝛾𝛾in the 𝜎-model, Nuovo Cim. A60, 47 (1969)

    1969

  3. [3]

    Vilenkin,Equilibrium parity-violating current in a mag- netic field, Phys

    A. Vilenkin,Equilibrium parity-violating current in a mag- netic field, Phys. Rev. D22, 3080 (1980)

    1980

  4. [4]

    Fukushima, D

    K. Fukushima, D. E. Kharzeev, and H. J. Warringa,Chiral magnetic effect, Phys. Rev. D78, 074033 (2008)

    2008

  5. [5]

    D. O. Rybalka, E. V. Gorbar, and I. A. Shovkovy,Hydrody- namic modes in a magnetized chiral plasma with vorticity, Phys. Rev. D99, 016017 (2019), arXiv:1807.07608

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Vilenkin,Macroscopic parity-violating effects: Neutrino fluxes from rotating black holes and in rotating thermal ra- diation, Phys

    A. Vilenkin,Macroscopic parity-violating effects: Neutrino fluxes from rotating black holes and in rotating thermal ra- diation, Phys. Rev. D20, 1807 (1979)

    1979

  7. [7]

    D. T. Son and P. Surówka,Hydrodynamics with triangle anomalies, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 191601 (2009)

    2009

  8. [8]

    D.Kharzeev, J.Liao, S.Voloshin,andG.Wang,Chiralmag- neticandvorticaleffectsinhigh-energynuclearcollisions—A status report, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.88, 1 (2016)

    2016

  9. [9]

    Joyce and M

    M. Joyce and M. Shaposhnikov,Primordial magnetic fields, right electrons, and the abelian anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1193 (1997)

    1997

  10. [10]

    Boyarsky, J

    A. Boyarsky, J. Fröhlich, and O. Ruchayskiy,Self-consistent evolution of magnetic fields and chiral asymmetry in the early universe, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 031301 (2012)

    2012

  11. [11]

    Rogachevskii, O

    I. Rogachevskii, O. Ruchayskiy, A. Boyarsky, J. Fröhlich, N. Kleeorin, A. Brandenburg, and J. Schober,Laminar and turbulentdynamosinchiralmagnetohydrodynamics.I.The- ory, Astrophys. J.846, 153 (2017)

    2017

  12. [12]

    Schober, I

    J. Schober, I. Rogachevskii, and A. Brandenburg,Chiral anomalyanddynamosfrominhomogeneouschemicalpoten- tial fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 065101 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    Schober, I

    J. Schober, I. Rogachevskii, and A. Brandenburg,Ef- ficiency of dynamos from an autonomous generation of chiral asymmetry, Phys. Rev. D110, 043515 (2024), arXiv:2404.07845

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    D. T. Son and B. Z. Spivak,Chiral anomaly and classical negative magnetoresistance of Weyl metals, Phys. Rev. B88, 104412 (2013)

    2013

  15. [15]

    Huanget al.,Observation of the chiral-anomaly-induced negative magnetoresistance in 3D Weyl semimetal TaAs, Phys

    X. Huanget al.,Observation of the chiral-anomaly-induced negative magnetoresistance in 3D Weyl semimetal TaAs, Phys. Rev. X5, 031023 (2015)

    2015

  16. [16]

    Xionget al.,Evidence for the chiral anomaly in the Dirac semimetal Na3Bi, Science350, 413 (2015)

    J. Xionget al.,Evidence for the chiral anomaly in the Dirac semimetal Na3Bi, Science350, 413 (2015)

    2015

  17. [17]

    Liet al.,Chiral magnetic effect in ZrTe5, Nat

    Q. Liet al.,Chiral magnetic effect in ZrTe5, Nat. Phys.12, 550 (2016)

    2016

  18. [18]

    D. E. Kharzeev, J. Liao, and P. Tribedy,Chiral magnetic ef- fect in heavy ion collisions: The present and future, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E33, 2430007 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Ohnishi and N

    A. Ohnishi and N. Yamamoto,Magnetars and the chiral plasma instabilities(2014), arXiv:1402.4760

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  20. [20]

    Yamamoto,Chiral transport of neutrinos in supernovae: Neutrino-induced fluid helicity and helical plasma instabil- ity, Phys

    N. Yamamoto,Chiral transport of neutrinos in supernovae: Neutrino-induced fluid helicity and helical plasma instabil- ity, Phys. Rev. D93, 065017 (2016)

    2016

  21. [21]

    Masada, K

    Y. Masada, K. Kotake, T. Takiwaki, and N. Yamamoto,Chi- ralmagnetohydrodynamicturbulenceincore-collapsesuper- novae, Phys. Rev. D98, 083018 (2018)

    2018

  22. [22]

    J.Matsumoto,N.Yamamoto,andD.-L.Yang,Chiralplasma 7 instability and inverse cascade from nonequilibrium left- handed neutrinos in core-collapse supernovae, Phys. Rev. D 105, 123029 (2022)

    2022

  23. [23]

    Dehman and J

    C. Dehman and J. A. Pons,On the origin of magnetar fields: Chiral magnetic instability in neutron star crusts(2024), arXiv:2408.05281

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Dehman and J

    C. Dehman and J. A. Pons,Magnetar field dynamics shaped by chiral anomalies and helicity, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033231 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    Dehman,Magnetar field dynamics driven by chi- ral anomalies without magnetic helicity(2026), arXiv:2605.08068

    C. Dehman,Magnetar field dynamics driven by chi- ral anomalies without magnetic helicity(2026), arXiv:2605.08068

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  26. [26]

    Sigl and N

    G. Sigl and N. Leite,Chiral magnetic effect in protoneutron stars and magnetic field spectral evolution, J. Cosmol. As- tropart. Phys. (2016) 025

    2016

  27. [27]

    Grabowska, D

    D. Grabowska, D. B. Kaplan, and S. Reddy,Role of the elec- tron mass in damping chiral plasma instability in super- novae and neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D91, 085035 (2015)

    2015

  28. [28]

    Kamada, N

    K. Kamada, N. Yamamoto, and D.-L. Yang,Chiral effects in astrophysics and cosmology, Progress in Particle and Nu- clear Physics129, 104016 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    Garg and J

    D. Garg and J. Schober,Relativistic chiral mhd with appli- cation to the early universe(2026), in prep

    2026

  30. [30]

    Huang, K

    X.-G. Huang, K. Nishimura, and N. Yamamoto,Anomalous effects of dense matter under rotation, J. High Energy Phys. 2(2018)

    2018

  31. [31]

    Wang and X.-G

    S. Wang and X.-G. Huang,Chiral magnetovortical instabil- ity, Phys. Rev. D109, L121302 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    Das and K

    A. Das and K. Tuchin,Rotational stability of magnetic field in rotating quark-gluon plasma, Nucl. Phys. A1059, 123075 (2025)

    2025

  33. [33]

    S. Wang, K. Hattori, X.-G. Huang, and A. V. Sadofyev,Chi- ral vortical instability(2025), arXiv:2503.17441

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Wang and X.-G

    S. Wang and X.-G. Huang,Rotation catalyzed chiral mag- netovortical instability, Phys. Rev. D113, 116033 (2026)

    2026

  35. [35]

    S.S.Komissarov,Multidimensionalnumericalschemeforre- sistive relativistic magnetohydrodynamics, Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc.382, 995 (2007)

    2007

  36. [36]

    Palenzuela, L

    C. Palenzuela, L. Lehner, O. Reula, and L. Rezzolla,Beyond ideal MHD: towards a more realistic modelling of relativistic astrophysicalplasmas,Mon.Not.R.Astron.Soc.394,1727 (2009)

    2009

  37. [37]

    Goldreich and W

    P. Goldreich and W. H. Julian,Pulsar electrodynamics, As- trophys. J.157, 869 (1969)

    1969

  38. [38]

    Contopoulos, D

    I. Contopoulos, D. Kazanas, and C. Fendt,The axisymmet- ric pulsar magnetosphere, Astrophys. J.511, 351 (1999)

    1999

  39. [39]

    Spitkovsky,Time-dependent force-free pulsar magneto- spheres: Axisymmetric and oblique rotators, Astrophys

    A. Spitkovsky,Time-dependent force-free pulsar magneto- spheres: Axisymmetric and oblique rotators, Astrophys. J. Lett.648, L51 (2006)

    2006

  40. [40]

    R. H. Levy,Diocotron instability in a cylindrical geometry, Phys. Fluids8, 1288 (1965)

    1965

  41. [41]

    Yoshizawa,Self-consistent turbulent dynamo modeling of reversed field pinches and planetary magnetic fields, Phys

    A. Yoshizawa,Self-consistent turbulent dynamo modeling of reversed field pinches and planetary magnetic fields, Phys. Fluids B: Plasma Phys.2, 1589 (1990)

    1990

  42. [42]

    Yokoi,Cross helicity and related dynamo, Geophys

    N. Yokoi,Cross helicity and related dynamo, Geophys. As- trophys. Fluid Dyn.107, 114 (2013)

    2013

  43. [43]

    Rädler and A

    K.-H. Rädler and A. Brandenburg,Mean electromotive force proportional to mean flow in mild turbulence, Astron. Nachr.331, 14 (2010)

    2010

  44. [44]

    a charge-flow insta- bility in plasmas with charge fluctuations

    D. Garg and J. Schober,Datasets for "a charge-flow insta- bility in plasmas with charge fluctuations"(2026)

    2026

  45. [45]

    Brandenburget al.(Pencil Code Collaboration),The Pencil Code, a modular MPI code for partial differen- tial equations and particles: multipurpose and multiuser- maintained, J

    A. Brandenburget al.(Pencil Code Collaboration),The Pencil Code, a modular MPI code for partial differen- tial equations and particles: multipurpose and multiuser- maintained, J. Open Source Softw.6, 2807 (2021)

    2021

  46. [46]

    Baym and H

    G. Baym and H. Heiselberg,Electrical conductivity in the early universe, Phys. Rev. D56, 5254 (1997)

    1997

  47. [47]

    Le Bellac,Thermal Field Theory(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996)

    M. Le Bellac,Thermal Field Theory(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996)

    1996

  48. [48]

    Blaizot and E

    J.-P. Blaizot and E. Iancu,Lifetime of quasiparticles in hot QED plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 3080 (1996)

    1996

  49. [49]

    Arnold, G

    P. Arnold, G. D. Moore, and L. G. Yaffe,Transport coeffi- cients in high temperature gauge theories (i): leading-log results, J. High Energy Phys.11(2000) 001

    2000

  50. [50]

    Gurgenidze, A

    M. Gurgenidze, A. J. Long, A. R. Pol, A. Branden- burg, and T. Kahniashvili,Primordial magnetic field from chiral plasma instability with sourcing(2025), arXiv:2512.09177

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Brandenburg, J

    A. Brandenburg, J. Schober, I. Rogachevskii, T. Kah- niashvili, A. Boyarsky, J. Fröhlich, O. Ruchayskiy, and N. Kleeorin,The turbulent chiral-magnetic cascade in the early universe, Astrophys. J. Lett.845, L21 (2017)

    2017

  52. [52]

    Schober, I

    J. Schober, I. Rogachevskii, A. Brandenburg, A. Boyarsky, J. Fröhlich, O. Ruchayskiy, and N. Kleeorin,Laminar and turbulent dynamos in chiral magnetohydrodynamics. II. Simulations, Astrophys. J.858, 124 (2018)

    2018

  53. [53]

    V. A. Skoutnev and A. M. Beloborodov,Inefficiency of chiral dynamos in protoneutron stars and the early universe, Phys. Rev. D113, 103020 (2026)

    2026

  54. [54]

    Boyarsky, V

    A. Boyarsky, V. Cheianov, O. Ruchayskiy, and O. Sobol, Equilibration of the chiral asymmetry due to finite electron massinelectron-positronplasma,Phys.Rev.D103,013003 (2021)

    2021

  55. [55]

    A.Boyarsky, V.Cheianov, O.Ruchayskiy,andO.Sobol,Evo- lution of the primordial axial charge across cosmic times, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 021801 (2021)

    2021

  56. [56]

    Schober, I

    J. Schober, I. Rogachevskii, and A. Brandenburg,Dynamo instabilities in plasmas with inhomogeneous chiral chemical potential, Phys. Rev. D105, 043507 (2022)

    2022