Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Generalized Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1602.06028 v6 pith:45N2MJTO submitted 2016-02-19 math.ST stat.TH

classification math.STstat.TH
keywords mechanismprivacygaussiandataresultssanitizedadultapplications
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Assessment of disclosure risk is of paramount importance in the research and applications of data privacy techniques. The concept of differential privacy (DP) formalizes privacy in probabilistic terms and provides a robust concept for privacy protection without making assumptions about the background knowledge of adversaries. Practical applications of DP involve development of DP mechanisms to release results at a pre-specified privacy budget. In this paper, we generalize the widely used Laplace mechanism to the family of generalized Gaussian (GG) mechanism based on the $l_p$ global sensitivity of statistical queries. We explore the theoretical requirement for the GG mechanism to reach DP at prespecified privacy parameters, and investigate the connections and differences between the GG mechanism and the Exponential mechanism based on the GG distribution We also present a lower bound on the scale parameter of the Gaussian mechanism of $(\epsilon,\delta)$-probabilistic DP as a special case of the GG mechanism, and compare the statistical utility of the sanitized results in the tail probability and dispersion in the Gaussian and Laplace mechanisms. Lastly, we apply the GG mechanism in 3 experiments (the mildew, Czech, adult data), and compare the accuracy of sanitized results via the $l_1$ distance and Kullback-Leibler divergence and examine how sanitization affects the prediction power of a classifier constructed with the sanitized data in the adult experiment.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools