Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 44 references

Oxygen Vacancy Induced Structural Distortions in Black Titania -- A Unique Approach using Soft X-Ray EXAFS at the O K-Edge

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The bulk lattice distortion of black titania is an oxygen-vacancy relaxation of anatase in which the nearest Ti–O bond contracts from 1.95 to 1.89 Å, measured directly by soft X-ray EXAFS at the O K-edge with an energy-dispersive detector.

desk verdict A solid methodological demonstration of soft x-ray EXAFS with an SDD, paired with a black titania structure that is an interesting hypothesis but not a proven result. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02618 v1 pith:45PCFRPR submitted 2019-08-07 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Brett Leedahl , Tristan de Boer , Xiaotao Yuan , Alexander Moewes This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords blacktitaniaoxygenvacancylatticedistortionsoftX-rayEXAFSOK-edgesilicondriftdetectoranataseTiO2mid-gapstates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to identify, at atomic scale, what changes in the crystal structure of ordinary anatase TiO$_2$ when it becomes black titania. Using soft X-ray EXAFS at the oxygen K-edge in fluorescence mode with an energy-dispersive silicon drift detector, the authors measure bulk Ti–O interatomic distances through several coordination shells. They conclude that the bulk distortion is a local relaxation around an oxygen vacancy: the nearest Ti–O distance shrinks from about $1.95$ Å to $1.89$ Å, the $4.26$ Å shell moves to $4.17$ Å, and the $4.76$ Å shell is unchanged, with Ti atoms shifting away from the vacancy and nearby O atoms shifting inward. If correct, this gives a concrete structural starting point for explaining the mid-gap electronic states that make black titania a promising photocatalyst.

What carries the argument

The central object is a proposed relaxed structure around a single missing oxygen atom in anatase: Ti atoms adjacent to the vacancy shift away from it, nearby O atoms shift inward, and the resulting Ti–O shell distances are $1.89$, $3.84$, $4.17$, and $4.76$ Å. The measurement is carried by an energy-dispersive silicon drift detector used as a fluorescence-yield EXAFS detector at the O K-edge; because it records full emission spectra, the analysis can fit and discard Ti, Fe, Ni, and Cu fluorescence lines and keep only the O signal, giving an unobstructed, bulk-sensitive EXAFS signal (~100 nm depth). The structural assignment is completed by a candidate search: a single oxygen vacancy with atoms within 5 Å displaced by less than $0.25$ Å while preserving the symmetry around the vacancy, with the displacement bound set by DFT relaxations.

What would settle it

A direct check would be independent Ti K-edge EXAFS or a total-scattering measurement of all atomic pair distances on the same black titania: if the nearest Ti–O distance is not near $1.89$ Å, or if the O–O distances contradict the proposed relaxation, the structure is wrong. A DFT relaxation of a single oxygen vacancy in anatase that moves atoms by more than the assumed $0.25$ Å bound would also show that the candidate search excluded the true distortion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that black titania's bulk lattice distortion is a specific oxygen-vacancy-induced relaxation of anatase rather than random disorder. The measured Ti–O shell distances—nearest neighbor $1.95 \to 1.89$ Å, the $3.86$ Å shell essentially unchanged at $3.84$ Å, the $4.26$ Å shell contracted to $4.17$ Å, and the $4.76$ Å shell unchanged—are matched by a single candidate structure in which Ti atoms near the vacancy move away from it to re-bond with the remaining lattice while nearby O atoms move inward. The authors argue that among hundreds of millions of symmetry-preserving candidate structures with displacements below $0.25$ Å, guided by DFT relaxation magnitudes, this is the only structure consistent with the measured Ti–O distances. They therefore conclude that the vacancy-induced distortion has been directly measured in the bulk.

Load-bearing premise

The result stands on the assumption that the true distortion lies within the searched family—a single oxygen vacancy with nearby atoms moving less than $0.25$ Å while keeping symmetry around the vacancy—and that the four measured Ti–O distances identify that structure uniquely.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Bulk soft X-ray EXAFS with an energy-dispersive detector can resolve coordination shells out to nearly 5 Å in oxides, because interfering fluorescence from other elements and from the sample chamber can be filtered out during analysis.
  • The proposed oxygen-vacancy relaxation gives electronic-structure theory a specific atomic geometry for black titania, replacing a generic disordered model with coordinates that can be used to compute the mid-gap states.
  • Any future structural model of black titania must reproduce the selective shifts measured here: nearest Ti–O contraction to $1.89$ Å, the $4.26$ Å shell contraction to $4.17$ Å, and an unchanged $4.76$ Å shell.
  • The same silicon-drift-detector-based fluorescence-yield approach can be extended to other vacancy- or dopant-induced distortions in low-Z oxides where overlapping absorption edges previously blocked soft X-ray EXAFS.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An independent testable extension would be to compare the proposed structure against O–O pair distances from total scattering; the paper deliberately relied on Ti–O distances only, so O–O agreement remains open.
  • If the relaxation is correct, the shifted atoms open modified interstitial pathways around the vacancy, which could explain the enhanced hydrogen mobility black titania is known for; this connection is implied but not modelled in the paper.
  • The method's ability to discard chamber fluorescence suggests it can be used operando, tracking vacancy-induced structural changes while a sample is under reactive gas, since gas-phase and sample-holder emission can be excluded in analysis.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports soft X-ray EXAFS at the O K-edge using a silicon drift detector for bulk-sensitive fluorescence detection, and validates the approach on rutile and anatase TiO2 before applying it to black titania. From the measured Ti-O shell distances, the authors generate candidate oxygen-vacancy defect structures in anatase, constrained by DFT relaxation magnitudes and symmetry, and propose the single structure in Figure 4 as the bulk distortion responsible for black titania. The abstract and conclusion claim that this structure is the only possible solution and that the distortion is directly measured.

Significance. The methodological contribution, SDD-based soft X-ray fluorescence EXAFS at the O K-edge, is demonstrated with credible validations on rutile and anatase, where fitted distances agree with known structures to within a few hundredths of an angstrom and the reproducibility is stated. The experimental error analysis of ±0.02 Å from systematic variation of background and k-range parameters is a strength. However, the central structural claim about black titania is not uniquely supported: the proposed structure is selected to reproduce the very distances extracted from the EXAFS fit, and the acknowledged bulk-averaging of the EXAFS signal is not modeled. The significance of the paper, if the structural identification were secure, would be high for understanding vacancy-induced distortions in black titania; as it stands, the unique-structure conclusion is underdetermined.

major comments (3)
  1. [Black Titania, Figure 3(f) and Table I] The central structural conclusion is reached by first fitting Ti-O interatomic distances from the experimental EXAFS spectrum and then generating candidate structures whose computed distances are compared with those fitted values. This makes the agreement between the proposed Figure 4 structure and the data a re-parameterization of the fitting result rather than an independent confirmation. The statement in the text that this is "the only possible solution" is therefore not established, because the selection criterion is the very observable being reproduced.
  2. [Black Titania, final paragraph] The authors acknowledge that the EXAFS result is a bulk average over all oxygen atoms with influence from non-distorted sites. Since O K-edge EXAFS is an incoherent sum over all absorbing oxygen environments, the fitted distances are occupancy-weighted averages over a distribution of local geometries. The manuscript does not model this distribution, nor does it demonstrate that a mixture of distorted and undistorted environments could not yield the same four effective Ti-O distances. The proposed single-vacancy periodic structure is consequently one of many possible interpretations of the averaged data.
  3. [Black Titania, 'Hundreds of millions' paragraph] The candidate search is restricted to a single oxygen vacancy, displacements of atoms within 5 Å by less than 0.25 Å, and preservation of symmetry around the vacancy. These constraints exclude multi-vacancy interactions, symmetry-lowering relaxations, and hydrogen-related distortions, all of which are relevant to black titania synthesis. With only four Ti-O shell distances used as the selection metric, the coupling of a narrow search space to a coarse observable is insufficient to support the uniqueness claim; no enumeration or convergence details are provided.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Introduction and Experiment and Calculation Methods] The formula for k is misstated: the text says "k2 = 2meE/¯h2," but the standard EXAFS relation is k^2 = 2m(E - E0)/ħ^2, with E0 the edge energy. Please correct this definition.
  2. [Black Titania, first paragraph] There is a typo in "antase TiO2" which should read "anatase TiO2."
  3. [Figure 1] The axis label in the figure appears garbled ("6 00700800900E"); it should read "Emission Energy [eV]."
  4. [Table I and text] There are numerical inconsistencies between the text and Table I: the text reports the 4.26 Å shell at 4.17 Å in black titania, while Table I lists 4.20(avg.) for that shell; the text says the 4.78 Å shell is unchanged, while Table I lists 4.76(avg.). Please clarify whether the table values are from the proposed structure or from the experimental fit, and ensure consistency.
  5. [Black Titania, 'Hundreds of millions' paragraph] The claim that "hundreds of millions of defect structures were tested" is not supported by any algorithmic detail, such as the random sampling scheme, the exact comparison metric, or the convergence of the selection, making the search step impossible to reproduce or assess.
  6. [Conclusion] The phrase "shown conclusively" is too strong given the averaging and search-space limitations discussed above; a more cautious phrasing such as "consistent with" would better match the evidence presented.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The proposed black-titania structure is chosen to match the EXAFS-derived Ti-O distances, so the model-data agreement is by construction.

  1. self definitional [Results and Discussion, 'Black Titania' (paragraph introducing Figure 4 and Table I)]
    "For these reasons, the Ti-O distances were used as the basis for the proposed structural defect found in Figure 4. That is, our proposed black titania distortion was found such that it agrees with the interatomic Ti-O distances found via experiment and fitting."

    The Figure 4 defect geometry is constructed and selected to reproduce the Ti-O shell distances that the EXAFS fit already determined. Therefore the later statements that this distortion 'uniquely maintains the above stated trends' and is 'surely a true representation of the crystal structure' are restatements of the fitting criterion, not independent evidence. The structural conclusion carries the same information as the input distances in a different representation; no independent prediction of the distortion is made.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Results and Discussion, 'Black Titania' (candidate search paragraph)]
    "Hundreds of millions of defect structures were tested by combing through the symmetry-reduced parameter space and individually comparing the distances in the model defect structures with the experimental results and choosing the closest fit, wherein a single vacancy was introduced and the atoms within 5 Å were allowed to shift around it."

    The candidate structure is selected as the best fit to the same fitted Ti-O distances that constitute the experimental result, so the agreement between Figure 4 and the EXAFS data is guaranteed by the selection procedure. The claim that this is 'the only possible solution' is a statement about the best fit within an assumed ansatz (one vacancy, displacements below 0.25 Å, preserved symmetry), not a test of that ansatz against independent data.

full rationale

The paper's methodological demonstration on rutile and anatase is self-contained: the authors compare soft x-ray EXAFS peak positions to known crystal structures and obtain independent agreement, so those parts are not circular. The central black-titania claim, however, is a best-fit reparameterization of the measured distances. The paper states explicitly that the proposed structure was found by comparing model distances to the experimentally fitted Ti-O distances and choosing the closest match; hence the model-data agreement is enforced by construction rather than being a prediction. The additional assertion that the distortion 'uniquely maintains' the observed trends depends on the same fitted values, and the search space is constrained by an assumed single-vacancy ansatz with small symmetry-preserving displacements. The bulk-averaging caveat noted by the authors (EXAFS averages over all oxygen sites, with influence from non-distorted sites) is a correctness risk rather than a circularity, but it further weakens the step from four averaged shell distances to a single periodic defect structure. No load-bearing self-citation chain is present; the self-citations concern sample synthesis and prior black-titania studies, not the uniqueness of the structural model. Overall, the black-titania structural conclusion reduces to the fitted EXAFS distances, giving a partial circularity score of 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on a chain of fitted and hand-chosen inputs: EXAFS distances fitted to the data, Debye-Waller factors bounded by convention, a random search over shifts of up to 0.25 Å with fixed symmetry, and a DFT vacancy density of 3%. The proposed structure is an invented model that is optimized to reproduce the measured distances, so it is best understood as a parameterization of the data rather than an independently verified arrangement.

free parameters (4)
  • Ti-O interatomic distances (EXAFS fit) = 1.89, 3.84, 4.17, 4.76 Å
    Allowed to vary in the EXAFS fit to black titania; these fitted distances are then used as targets for the structural search.
  • Debye-Waller factors = varied within ~0.005 Å^2
    Allowed to vary within a chemically reasonable range in the EXAFS fit; they affect peak amplitudes and thus the distance determination.
  • Atomic displacement range for candidate structures = ≤0.25 Å
    Hand-chosen bound for random atomic shifts around the vacancy; the final structure depends on this range being sufficient.
  • Oxygen vacancy density in DFT = 3%
    Used in WIEN2k PBEsol calculations to infer allowed movement; chosen by the authors, not independently derived.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The EXAFS phase-shift and amplitude functions (McKale tables for rutile, FEFF for anatase and black titania) are accurate.
    Used to convert measured oscillations into distances; errors in these functions would shift all fitted distances.
  • domain assumption The black titania sample is bulk oxygen-deficient anatase with oxygen vacancies as the dominant defect.
    The model assumes a single oxygen vacancy in an anatase lattice; if other defects or phases dominate, the fitted distances would be misinterpreted.
  • ad hoc to paper Symmetry around the oxygen vacancy is preserved during relaxation.
    The candidate structure search restricts to symmetry-preserving distortions, a modeling constraint not independently justified in the paper.
  • domain assumption The DFT PBEsol relaxed structures bound the plausible atomic movement (up to 0.25 Å).
    Used to justify the search range; if the functional underestimates relaxation, the true structure may be outside the searched space.
  • standard math Standard EXAFS Fourier transform relation ΔR = π/(2Δk) and constrained Gaussian peak fitting are valid.
    Standard background for the analysis; the Gaussian fitting separates Ti and O emission lines and is used to produce the XAS spectra.
invented entities (1)
  • Single oxygen vacancy distorted anatase superstructure (Figure 4)
    purpose: Explains measured Ti-O distances and bulk distortions in black titania
    The structure is constructed to match the fitted EXAFS distances; no independent diffraction or spectroscopic confirmation is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Oxygen Vacancy Induced Structural Distortions in Black Titania -- A Unique Approach using Soft X-Ray EXAFS at the O K-Edge." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/45PCFRPR

@misc{pith2026190802618,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Oxygen Vacancy Induced Structural Distortions in Black Titania -- A Unique Approach using Soft X-Ray EXAFS at the O K-Edge},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/45PCFRPR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02618}
}
abstract

Unknown changes in the crystalline order of regular TiO$_2$ result in the formation of black titania, which has garnered significant interest as a photocatalytic material due to the accompanying electronic changes. Herein, we determine the nature of the lattice distortion caused by an oxygen vacancy that in turn results in the formation of mid-band gap states found in previous studies of black titania. We introduce an innovative technique using a state-of-the-art silicon drift detector, which can be used in conjunction with extended x-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) to measure bulk interatomic distances. We illustrate how the energy dispersive nature of such a detector can allow us an unimpeded signal, indefinitely in energy space, thereby sidestepping the hurdles of more conventional EXAFS, which is often impeded by other absorption edges.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.02618 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Color map of the TiO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a)(c)(e) EXAFS signal derived from XAS after sub [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Proposed distorted anatase structure that results in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The ultra high vacuum chamber is made of stainless steel, and the arm that holds the sample is largely made of copper

    The energy resolution in this energy range is ≈100 eV, and therefore overlapping emission lines need to be dissociated.[24] The Fe, Ni, and Cu L2,3 emission photons that are observable in Figure 1 arise from scattered photons in the sample chamber interacting with the chamber itself. The ultra high vacuum chamber is made of stainless steel, and the arm th...

    work page

  2. [2]

    L. Liu, P. Y. Yu, X. Chen, S. S. Mao, and D. Z. Shen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 065505 (2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    S. Coh, P. Y. Yu, Y. Aoki, S. Saito, S. G. Louie, and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. B 95, 085422 (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    X. Chen, L. Liu, Z. Liu, M. A. Marcus, W.-C. Wang, N. A. Oyler, M. E. Grass, B. Mao, P.-A. Glans, P. Y. Yu, et al. , Sci. Rep. 3 (2013), 10.1038/srep01510

    work page doi:10.1038/srep01510 2013

  5. [5]

    H. Lu, B. Zhao, R. Pan, J. Yao, J. Qiu, L. Luo, and Y. Liu, RSC Adv. 4, 1128 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    C. M. Yim, C. L. Pang, and G. Thornton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 036806 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    W. Zhou, W. Li, J.-Q. Wang, Y. Qu, Y. Yang, Y. Xie, K. Zhang, L. Wang, H. Fu, and D. Zhao, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 9280 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    B. K. Teo, EXAFS: basic principles and data analysis , Vol. 9 (Springer Science & Business Media, 1986)

    work page 1986

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    S. S. Ataei, S. J. Hashemifar, and M. R. Moham- madizadeh, Comp. Mater. Sci. 139, 84 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    Popmintchev, B

    D. Popmintchev, B. R. Galloway, M.-C. Chen, F. Dollar, C. A. Mancuso, A. Hankla, L. Miaja-Avila, G. O’Neil, J. M. Shaw, G. Fan, S. Aliˇ sauskas, G. Andriukaitis, T. Balˇ ciunas, O. D. M¨ ucke, A. Pugzlys, A. Baltuˇ ska, H. C. Kapteyn, T. Popmintchev, and M. M. Murnane, Phys. R...

    2018

  3. [11]

    E. A. Stern, Phys. Rev. B 10, 3027 (1974)

    1974

  4. [12]

    Zhang, P

    H. Zhang, P. An, W. Zhou, B. Y. Guan, P. Zhang, J. Dong, and X. W. D. Lou, Sci. Adv. 4 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    Y.-Y. Hu, Z. Liu, K.-W. Nam, O. J. Borkiewicz, J. Cheng, X. Hua, M. T. Dunstan, X. Yu, K. M. Wiaderek, L.-S. Du, K. W. Chapman, P. J. Chupas, X.-Q. Yang, and C. P. Grey, Nat. Mater. 12, 1130 EP (2013)

    2013

  6. [14]

    St¨ ohr, L

    J. St¨ ohr, L. Johansson, I. Lindau, and P. Pianetta, Phys. Rev. B 20, 664 (1979)

    1979

  7. [15]

    St¨ ohr, D

    J. St¨ ohr, D. Denley, and P. Perfetti, Phys. Rev. B 18, 4132 (1978)

    1978

  8. [16]

    Tr¨ oger, D

    L. Tr¨ oger, D. Arvanitis, J. J. Rehr, T. Lederer, T. Yokoyama, K. Baberschke, and E. Zschech, Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 137 (1993)

    1993

  9. [17]

    St¨ ohr, R. S. Bauer, J. C. McMenamin, L. I. Johansson, and S. Brennan, J. Vac. Sci.Tech. 16, 1195 (1979)

    1979

  10. [18]

    Amemiya, Y

    K. Amemiya, Y. Kitajima, Y. Yonamoto, S. Terada, H. Tsukabayashi, T. Yokoyama, and T. Ohta, Phys. Rev. B 59, 2307 (1999)

    1999

  11. [19]

    C. Dagg, L. Troger, D. Arvanitis, and K. Baberschke, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 5, 6845 (1993)

    1993

  12. [20]

    Y. Kao, L. Jang, W. Ng, A. Krol, S. Woronick, F. Xu, and Y. Yao, Physica B: Condens. Matter 158, 488 (1989)

    1989

  13. [21]

    B. X. Yang, J. Kirz, and T. K. Sham, Phys. Rev. A 36, 4298 (1987)

    1987

  14. [22]

    Lechner, C

    P. Lechner, C. Fiorini, R. Hartmann, J. Kemmer, N. Krause, P. Leutenegger, A. Longoni, H. Soltau, D. St¨ otter, R. St¨ otter, L. Str¨ uder, and U. Weber, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A. 458, 281 (2001)

    2001

  15. [23]

    Zubavichus, Y

    Y. Zubavichus, Y. Yang, M. Zharnikov, O. Fuchs, T. Schmidt, C. Heske, E. Umbach, G. Tzvetkov, F. P. Netzer, and M. Grunze, ChemPhysChem 5, 509 (2004)

    2004

  16. [24]

    T. M. Tolhurst, J. L. Andrews, B. Leedahl, P. M. Marley, S. Banerjee, and A. Moewes, Chem. Eur. J. 23, 9846 (2017)

    2017

  17. [25]

    Lechner, A

    P. Lechner, A. Pahlke, and H. Soltau, X-Ray Spectrom. 33, 256 (2004)

    2004

  18. [26]

    A. G. McKale, B. W. Veal, A. P. Paulikas, S. K. Chan, and G. S. Knapp, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110, 3763 (1988)

    1988

  19. [27]

    G. N. George and I. J. Pickering, SSRL, Stanford (1995)

    1995

  20. [28]

    X. Yuan, X. Wang, X. Liu, H. Ge, G. Yin, C. Dong, and F. Huang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 27654 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    X. Liu, G. Zhu, X. Wang, X. Yuan, T. Lin, and F. Huang, Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1600452 (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    Calvin, XAFS for Everyone (CRC press, 2013)

    S. Calvin, XAFS for Everyone (CRC press, 2013)

    2013

  23. [31]

    Z. Wang, C. Yang, T. Lin, H. Yin, P. Chen, D. Wan, F. Xu, F. Huang, J. Lin, X. Xie, and M. Jiang, Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 3007 (2013)

    2013

  24. [32]

    J. R. Smyth, R. J. Swope, and A. R. Pawley, Am. Min- eral. 80, 454 (1995)

    1995

  25. [33]

    E. P. Meagher and G. A. Lager, Canad. Mineral. 17, 77 (1979)

    1979

  26. [34]

    Maqbool and A

    Q. Maqbool and A. Srivastava, Chem. Eur. J. 23, 13864 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    G. C. V´ asquez, S. Z. Karazhanov, D. Maestre, A. Cre- mades, J. Piqueras, and S. E. Foss, Phys. Rev. B 94, 235209 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    P. M. Kowalski, M. F. Camellone, N. N. Nair, B. Meyer, and D. Marx, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 146405 (2010)

    2010

  29. [37]

    Janotti, J

    A. Janotti, J. B. Varley, P. Rinke, N. Umezawa, G. Kresse, and C. G. Van de Walle, Phys. Rev. B 81, 085212 (2010)

    2010

  30. [38]

    Na-Phattalung, M

    S. Na-Phattalung, M. F. Smith, K. Kim, M.-H. Du, S.-H. Wei, S. B. Zhang, and S. Limpijumnong, Phys. Rev. B 73, 125205 (2006)

    2006

  31. [39]

    Pan, M.-Q

    X. Pan, M.-Q. Yang, X. Fu, N. Zhang, and Y.-J. Xu, Nanoscale 5, 3601 (2013)

    2013

  32. [40]

    C. Yang, Z. Wang, T. Lin, H. Yin, X. Lu, D. Wan, T. Xu, C. Zheng, J. Lin, F. Huang, X. Xie, and M. Jiang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 17831 (2013)

    2013

  33. [41]

    H. Song, C. Li, Z. Lou, Z. Ye, and L. Zhu, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 5, 8982 (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    (with a 3% oxygen vacancy density) showed that nearest neighbour Ti-O bond lengths changed by up to 0.125 ˚A upon the introduction of a vacancy, while farther Ti-O distances were changed by up to 0.25 ˚A. Therefore, the candidate structures were generated by allowing the atoms...

  35. [43]

    Schwarz, P

    K. Schwarz, P. Blaha, and G. K. H. Madsen, Comp. Phys. Comm. 147, 71 (2002)

    2002

  36. [44]

    J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406 (2008)

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.