Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 42 references

Modelling Statistics of Polypeptides in Emissions from Smokers Near Ocean Ridges

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that polypeptide data from six deep-sea smoker samples fit a rapid-quench model, supporting hydrothermal vents as a plausible prebiotic source.

desk verdict Plausible extension of the quench model, but the smoker comparison is heavily fitted: three parameters on six points with a 90% background, and the freeze premise is asserted rather than tested. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.20052 v1 pith:45RLOVOR submitted 2025-06-24 q-bio.BM physics.bio-ph

Ben Intoy , J. W. Halley This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-bio.BMphysics.bio-ph
keywords originoflifehydrothermalventspolypeptidesquenchingpolymerlengthdistributionnonequilibriumchemistryMarianaTroughaminoacidconcentrations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks where the first lifelike polypeptide collections could have come from. It extends the authors' earlier quenching model, in which hot mixtures of amino acids are rapidly cooled so that the high-temperature polymer length distribution is frozen in place, to the realistic case where different amino acids are present at different concentrations. It then compares the model's predicted monomer fraction to six fluid samples collected from hydrothermal 'smokers' in the Mariana Trough. With three fitted parameters, the model tracks the observed sample-to-sample trend. The authors conclude that the observations are consistent with smokers as a source of large, diverse, thermally non-equilibrium polypeptide populations that could incubate prebiotic chemistry.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the maximum-entropy equilibrium length distribution of polymers whose monomer sequences are drawn with probabilities $\{p_t\}$ from a multinomial distribution. Each polymer of length $L$ and composition $\{n_{L,i,t}\}$ carries a degeneracy $G_{L,i}=L!/\prod_t n_{L,i,t}!$, and the averaged degeneracy $\langle e^{s_L} \rangle$ enters the predicted mean number of polymers of length $L$ via $\langle N_L \rangle = (\langle e^{s_L} \rangle - 1)/(e^{\beta\Delta(L-1)-\mu\beta}-1)$. The paper approximates $\ln\langle e^{s_L} \rangle \approx C_1 L + C_2$, defines a composition-dependent critical temperature $T_{c,2} = -\Delta/(k_B C_1)$, and packages the comparison to data in Eq. (20), which relates the monomer fraction to $r_0$, $f_0$, and a temperature rescaling $\lambda$. This machinery lets the model convert measured amino-acid concentrations and fluid temperatures into a predicted monomer fraction without running kinetic simulations.

What would settle it

Measure how the polypeptide length distribution evolves in a smoker plume after it enters cold water: if the monomer fraction rises measurably toward the cold-water equilibrium (nearly all monomers) over an observable timescale, then scission and ligation are not frozen out and the Eq. (20) comparison would no longer test the quenching hypothesis.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the measured polypeptide content of smoker fluids — where only about 2% of amino acids are monomers, compared with the nearly-all-monomer equilibrium expected at cold ocean-floor temperatures — is what one would see if the fluids had equilibrated at high temperature and then been quenched so quickly that bond breaking and formation froze out. To make that comparison the paper generalizes the polymer length distribution to allow each amino acid type its own concentration $p_t$. The resulting number distribution $\langle N_L \rangle$ is governed by an averaged type-degeneracy term $\langle e^{s_L} \rangle$ that is approximated as $\exp(C_1 L + C_2)$, and the model's prediction for $\ln(1-\langle N_1 \rangle/N_m)$ is fitted to the six samples with a background fraction $f_0$, a polymer-coil volume set by $r_0$, and a temperature scale factor $\lambda$. The fit ($r_0 = 245$ Å, $f_0 = 0.90$, $\lambda = 1.477$) reproduces the observed trend, leading the authors to state that the data do not exclude, and are consistent with, a quenching origin for the observed non-equilibrium polypeptides.

Load-bearing premise

The comparison assumes that the polymer length distribution in the fluid after quenching is identical to the thermal equilibrium distribution at the high temperature before the quench, because scission and ligation are frozen out in cold water — an assumption that enters before any data fitting and is not independently verified for smoker fluids.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the quenching mechanism is right, hydrothermal smokers on the early Earth could have continuously generated large numbers of diverse polypeptide sequences driven out of equilibrium, providing raw material for natural selection among prebiotic chemistries.
  • The model predicts that the critical temperature $T_{c,2}$ above which the polymer distribution diverges depends on the monomer concentration set $\{p_t\}$, so smokers with different amino-acid profiles would be expected to differ systematically in their polymer statistics.
  • The small observed monomer fraction implies that the emitted fluids are far from cold-water equilibrium, so any process (biological or geological) proposed as an alternative source must also explain why the length distribution is so heavily weighted toward polymers.
  • The fitted background fraction $f_0 \approx 0.90$ implies that most of the observed polymer fraction is sample-independent; within the paper's interpretation, distinguishing this background from biogenic or dilution contributions is essential to a quantitative test.
  • Updated peptide-bond free-energy measurements in seawater-like conditions would directly sharpen the model's predictions and reduce the dominant uncertainty in $\Delta$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The fitted polymer-coil radius $r_0 \approx 245$ Å is far larger than the ~2 Å monomer scale used for modern proteins (the paper notes a discrepancy when $r_0\sim2$ Å); a reader could interpret this as evidence that the effective 'monomer volume' in the model absorbs aggregation, solvation, or concentration effects, so $r_0$ should not be read literally as a physical coil size.
  • The temperature rescaling $\lambda=1.477$ means the model only fits if the reported smoker temperatures are systematically lower than the true pre-quench values; a targeted re-measurement of vent-fluid temperatures with better sampling methods would provide an independent check of this assumption.
  • Because $T_{c,2}$ depends on $\{p_t\}$, the model makes a testable comparative prediction: two smokers with different measured amino acid profiles should show different polymer length statistics, even at the same temperature and density, a check that could be performed on existing sample archives.
  • The same equation (20) could be transferred to other quench-dominated prebiotic settings, such as tidal pools or impact-generated hot fluids, by substituting local temperatures and concentrations to obtain a predicted monomer fraction for comparison with any reported peptide data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper extends a previously developed statistical-mechanical model of polypeptide length distributions to allow unequal concentrations of amino acid monomers. It derives an equilibrium distribution <N_L> for polymers of length L using an averaged degeneracy <e^{s_L}> computed from observed monomer fractions, then compares the resulting expression with six smoker-fluid samples from the Mariana Trough. The authors report that, after fitting r0, f0, and λ, the model reproduces the observed quantity ln(1 - <N_1>/N_m), and they conclude that the data are consistent with the hypothesis that hydrothermal smoker emissions could have been a source of diverse, non-equilibrium prebiotic polypeptides.

Significance. If the central claim held, the paper would provide a quantitative statistical test of a specific origin-of-life scenario: that rapid quenching of hot smoker fluids freezes a non-equilibrium polypeptide length distribution. The treatment of heterogeneous monomer concentrations is a genuine extension of the authors' previous work, and the explicit acknowledgment of uncertainties in Δ and temperature is commendable. The principal value is the derivation of an analytically tractable equilibrium length distribution under heterogeneous monomer fractions and its application to real oceanographic data. However, the observational test is a three-parameter fit to six data points, not an independent prediction, and the freeze/equilibration premise is assumed rather than independently established. The paper therefore does not as written substantiate the stronger claim of validation, though it does suggest a plausible consistency.

major comments (4)
  1. [§IV and §V, Eq. (20)] The text states in §IV that 'we fit the observed values for the quantity on the left of (20) to the right hand side using r0, f0 and λ as fitting parameters.' With six data points and three fitted parameters, and with f0≈0.90 making the model-specific term contribute only a 10% weight plus a sample-independent background, Figure 2 cannot be read as validating the quenching mechanism. The manuscript should report the goodness of fit (residuals, R² or chi-square), the covariance of the fitted parameters, and an explicit test that the model is distinguishable from a constant background f0. Without this, the conclusion that the data are 'consistent' with the model is not a falsifiable prediction.
  2. [§I and §IV] The comparison in Eq. (20) tests the model only if the post-quench polymer length distribution is identical to the pre-quench thermal equilibrium distribution, an assumption stated in §I ('we will assume here, as we did in [11]'). The paper's cited support is prior rate estimates and the prokaryote length-distribution analysis [22], but no quantitative check is provided for the specific smoker thermal history: subsurface dwell time, vent temperature before mixing, quench rate, and time from emission to sampling. Appendix III acknowledges large uncertainties in temperature and dilution, which makes this omission more serious because the fitted parameters can absorb kinetic or mixing effects. The authors should either supply such a check or explicitly weaken the claim to a conditional statement: if the freeze premise holds, the data are consistent with the model.
  3. [§II–§III, Eq. (8) and Appendix I] The central equilibrium formula (8) is derived by replacing the sum over polymers with an integral over a density of states and applying Stirling's approximation, which requires that N_{L,s} be substantially larger than unity. For the short lengths and small sample numbers relevant to the smoker data, this condition is not verified, and the approximation leading to Eq. (9) for L=3,...,8 is presented without an error estimate. Since Eq. (9) and the fitted C1 and C2 enter directly into Eqs. (14)–(20), the theoretical uncertainty is incomplete without a quantitative estimate of this approximation error.
  4. [§IV and Appendix III] The fitted temperature scale factor λ and the wide ranges in Table III (0.48 ≤ λ ≤ 1.48, 106 Å ≤ r0 ≤ 245 Å) indicate that the reported smoker temperatures and microscopic volume are highly uncertain. Because the conclusion rests on a single figure with no reported error bars, the rough agreement in Figure 2 is not sufficient to prefer the quenching mechanism over the biogenic or dilution background discussed in §V. A sensitivity analysis showing how the residuals depend on λ and r0, or a contour of the fit quality, would be necessary to make the comparison quantitative.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title/Abstract vs. text] The trough name is spelled inconsistently as 'Marianna' in the abstract and 'Mariana' in the body and reference [20]; please standardize.
  2. [§III and Appendix II, Eqs. (13) and (32)] Equations (13) and (32) contain apparent typographical errors, such as 'e(β ∆)' where an exponential depending on L seems intended; please correct them.
  3. [§III and Table I] The phrase 'where is β is evaluated at the high temperature before quench' has a redundant 'is', and 'Argenine' in Table I should be 'arginine'.
  4. [References] The references have formatting issues: reference [12] and the end of [24] both append 'Phys. Rev. E 96, 062402 (2017)', which appears to duplicate part of [8]; please recheck the citation list.
  5. [Figures 1 and 2] Figures 1 and 2 should include error bars or at least state the noise level of the data; without this, the reader cannot judge the scatter against the model curves.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The Eq. (20) comparison is a three-parameter least-squares fit to the same six smoker samples, then labeled a 'prediction'; the comparison also depends on a pre-quench equilibration premise imported from the authors' own prior work.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section IV, around Eq. (20) and Figure 2; reiterated in Section V.]
    "In summary, we fit the observed values for the quantity on the left of (20) to the right hand side using r0, f0 and λ as fitting parameters with results shown in Figure 2."

    Equation (20) is the paper's central comparison, and the three constants r0, f0, and λ entering its right-hand side are adjusted to minimize the squared difference against the very same observed monomer fractions shown on the left, for the same six samples. The resulting agreement in Figure 2 is therefore a fitted curve, not an independent prediction. The fit is further softened by f0=0.90, which absorbs 90% of the signal as a sample-independent background, and by λ=1.477, which rescales the reported vent temperatures. With only six data points and three fitted parameters, the comparison cannot validate the model beyond the fitting procedure; calling the result a 'prediction' in Section V is a renaming of the fit.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section I, introductory assumption; supported by refs [11] and [22].]
    "In [11] we argued that the temperatures and dwell times of the fluid emitted from the smokers before it was emitted were such that the polymer length distributions in the fluid after quench in the cold water at the ocean floor would be essentially the equilibrium distributions that they had before quench. Therefore we will assume here, as we did in [11], that the polymer length distribution of the polypeptides in the fluid after emission into the cold ocean water remains the same as the thermally equilibrated length distribution that it had at a high temperature just before quench."

    The load-bearing premise that lets Eq. (20) test the quenching mechanism is that the sampled post-quench length distribution equals the thermal equilibrium distribution at the pre-quench temperature. This premise is imported from the authors' own prior papers [11] and [22], with no independent check against the Mariana Trough thermal history: subsurface dwell time, vent temperature, quench rate, and transit time to collection are not quantitatively established for these samples. Appendix III itself warns that the reported temperatures are 'quite uncertain and probably too low' and that there is 'significant dilution' by ocean water. Without independent support for the freeze-and-equilibration premise, the fitted comparison in Eq.

full rationale

The paper's genuinely independent contribution is the equilibrium length-distribution calculation with heterogeneous monomer concentrations {p_t}, leading to Eqs. (6)-(9), and the numerical evaluation of <e^{s_L}> from the reported amino-acid compositions. That part is not circular. The circularity arises when the paper moves from this calculation to the claimed comparison with the Mariana Trough observations. The text states explicitly that r0, f0, and λ are fitted to minimize the difference between the right and left sides of Eq. (20) for the six samples. The resulting Figure 2 is therefore a demonstration of flexibility, not a prediction: three parameters are tuned to six data points, with f0=0.90 already removing almost all sample-to-sample variation as a constant background, and λ rescaling the reported temperatures. Calling this a 'prediction' in Section V, and using Figure 2 as evidence that the data are 'consistent with' the quenching mechanism, converts fitted inputs into apparent confirmation. Separately, the identification of the post-quench distribution with the pre-quench equilibrium distribution is asserted by reference to the authors' own prior work [11] and [22]; the current paper supplies no independent test of that premise for smoker fluids. This self-citation is load-bearing because Eq. (20) is derived from the equilibrium formula (8): if the hot fluid was not equilibrated or if peptide bonds changed after sampling, the fitted agreement means nothing for the quenching hypothesis. The paper is honest about the uncertainties in Appendix III, but honesty about the fitting does not make the fitted comparison an independent test. Overall, the central observational claim is partially circular: one part is a fitted-input-called-prediction, and another part rests on an unverified premise borrowed from the authors' own prior work.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central comparison rests on a small set of modeling postulates, most inherited from the authors' earlier work. The only newly fitted quantities are r0, f0, λ; the model itself contributes no new physical entities. The freeze assumption is the most consequential postulate, as the whole data comparison is predicated on it.

free parameters (4)
  • r0 = 245 Å (range 106 to 245 Å)
    Microscopic coil volume vp = (4πr0^3)/3; fitted to match observed monomer fractions in Eq. (20).
  • f0 = 0.90 (range 0.90 to 0.94)
    Sample-independent background fraction of bonded polymers; absorbs most of the signal (90%).
  • λ = 1.477 (range 0.48 to 1.48)
    Common multiplicative scale factor applied to reported vent temperatures; fitted in Eq. (20). Large range indicates temperature data are very uncertain.
  • ν = not stated in paper
    Exponent in the L^{-3ν} factor in S'(β) (Eq. 17). The value is not specified in this paper, and it changes the converged sums, so a reader cannot reproduce the fit without guessing.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption The post-quench polymer length distribution equals the high-temperature equilibrium distribution just before the quench (scission and ligation are frozen out in cold water).
    Section I and II; the entire comparison to smoker data depends on this freeze assumption, which is asserted rather than measured for the vents.
  • domain assumption The system is well mixed with no spatial diffusion.
    Section II; explicitly assumed as in prior work; ignores concentration gradients in the plume.
  • domain assumption Polymers are unbranched linear chains.
    Section III ('neglecting the possibility of branched polymers here').
  • domain assumption The bonding energy Δ is the same for all pairs of amino acid types.
    Section II; Δ is a single real number for all peptide bonds, while [27] reports variation by context.
  • domain assumption The monomer availability probabilities pt are the measured global amino acid fractions in each sample.
    Eq. (19) sets pt from total observed amino acid concentrations; this assumes sampling represents the reactive medium.
  • standard math The equilibrium length distribution is the maximum entropy distribution over polymer segmentations with fixed Nm and monomer fractions.
    Appendix I; the derivation uses Stirling maximization and a density of states D(s).
  • domain assumption Hydrolysis and bond-breaking kinetics are negligible after the quench.
    Related to the freeze assumption; stated as rate estimates based on laboratory data.
  • domain assumption pH and salinity do not alter the equilibrium peptide bond free energy Δ.
    Discussion section; only pure-water glycine-glycine data are used, and pH is not considered.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modelling Statistics of Polypeptides in Emissions from Smokers Near Ocean Ridges." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/45RLOVOR

@misc{pith2026250620052,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modelling Statistics of Polypeptides in Emissions from Smokers Near Ocean Ridges},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/45RLOVOR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.20052}
}
read the original abstract

We have previously shown in model studies that rapid quenches of systems of monomers interacting to form polymer chains can fix nonequilibrium chemistries which could lead to the origin of life. We suggested that such quenching processes might have occurred at very high rates on early earth, giving an efficient mechanism for natural sorting through enormous numbers of nonequilibrium chemistries from which those most likely to lead to life could be naturally selected. Taking account of kinetic barriers, we found good agreement between laboratory quenching experiments on solutions of amino acids and the resulting model. We also made a preliminary comparison between reported data on polypeptides sampled from emissions from smokers near ocean ridges and our model. However that previous model assumed that the concentrations of all monomeric amino acids in the medium were the same whereas that is not the case in samples taken from ocean smokers. Here we take account of the heterogeneous concentrations of the amino acid monomers in the medium in the analysis of the smoker data and compare the results with the data on polypeptide concentrations found in the samples taken by a submersible in the Marianna Trough. Results are consistent with the hypothesis that smokers were the source of large and extremely diverse number of polypeptides in thermal disequilibrium which could incubate processes leading to life.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.20052 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. .Averaged values [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Comparison of values of the left hand side of equation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [11]

    That is definitely not the case in the ocean trough observations reported in [20]

    is that in [11] we assumed pt = 1 /b , that is that all monomers are equally available during network forma- tion. That is definitely not the case in the ocean trough observations reported in [20]. The object of the present paper is to report an analysis which corrects that defect in the analysis of the data reported in [20]. As discussed in the introducti...

    work page

  2. [22]

    Wynveen, I

    A. Wynveen, I. Fedorov, and J. W. Halley, Phys. Rev. E 89, 022725 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [1]

    That physically means we have allowed the types to rearrange themselves along the line discussed above and that that process is fast, contrary to what we are going to assume here. In that hypothetical case sL,i would be independent of i and its value for large L would be s′ L = − L ∑ t pt ln pt (4) If we further assumed that all types were equally likely ...

    work page

  4. [2]

    D1435 CW .07 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.32 0.00 3.D1436 CW .09 .06 0.23 0.12 0.29 .09 .05 0.00 .03 .05 0.00

    work page

  5. [3]

    1.3648520 -2.7470862 811.13 639.77

    work page

  6. [4]

    D1438 CW 0.13 .09 0.31 .09 0.39 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 .03 0.0

    work page

  7. [5]

    D1440 CW 0.19 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

    work page

  8. [6]

    Values of C1, C 2, T c,2 extracted from the values in Table 1 , the fit described and ill ustrated in Fig

    D1441 CW .10 .06 0.33 .03 0.27 0.16 0.00 0.00 .02 .022 0.00 TABLE II. Values of C1, C 2, T c,2 extracted from the values in Table 1 , the fit described and ill ustrated in Fig. 1 and the reported temperatures of the effluent from the smokers from wh ich the 6 samples were taken as reported in [20]. Sample C1 C2 Tc,2 Tobserved

    work page

Show all 42 references
  1. [7]

    1.30799055 -2.61798072 846. 710.67

  2. [8]

    1.18290043 -2.27813458 935.9 461.06

  3. [9]

    Qianyi Sheng, Ben Intoy, and J. W. Halley Phys. Rev. E 102, 062412 (2020)

    2020

  4. [10]

    1.12157631 -2.1479790 987.07 803.7

  5. [12]

    0.903600395 -1.64104235 1225.19 481.73

  6. [13]

    Values of C1, C 2, T c, 2 the reported temperature of the effluent are shown here in Table 2

    1.25609303 -2.49383354 881.37 802.25 which are easily determined for each observed smoker from Table 3 of [20] as shown here in Table 1. Values of C1, C 2, T c, 2 the reported temperature of the effluent are shown here in Table 2. In each of the samples the temperatures were low...

  7. [14]

    Bronja, A.; Greule, M.; Keppler, F.; Mulder, I.; Sattler, T.; Sch¨ oler, H.F

    Schreiber, U.; Mayer, C.; Schmitz, O.J.; Rosendahl, P. ; Bronja, A.; Greule, M.; Keppler, F.; Mulder, I.; Sattler, T.; Sch¨ oler, H.F. Organic compounds in fluid inclusions of Archean quartz – analogues of prebiotic chemistry on early Earth, PLOS ONE 2017, 12(6): e0177570

    2017

  8. [15]

    Manfred Eigen, Die NaturWissenschaftten 58,465-523 (1971)

    1971

  9. [16]

    C. P. J. Maury,Orig Life Evol Biosph (2009) 39:141–150

    2009

  10. [17]

    Detlev Riesner, British Medical Bulletin 2003; 66: 21–3 3

    2003

  11. [18]

    Baskakov, THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, Vol

    Ilia V. Baskakov, THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, Vol. 279, No. 9, Issue of February 27, pp. 7671–7677, 2004

    2004

  12. [19]

    Uversky, Yuri L

    Alexander Portillo, Mohtadin Hashemi, Yuliang Zhang, Leonid Breydo, Vladimir N. Uversky, Yuri L. Lyubchenko,Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1854 218–228 (2015)

    2015

  13. [20]

    do not exclude the possibility that polypeptides pro- duced in smokers and then quenched could have produced the kind of repeated sampling and fixing of polypeptides needed in the natural search for a combination leading to the initiation of life. The sharp contrast between the...

  14. [21]

    Peptide Amyloids in the Origin of Life

    Greenwald, J., Kwiatkowski, W., and Riek, R. . Peptide Amyloids in the Origin of Life. J Mol Biol 430, 3735- 3750m (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    B. F. Intoy and J. W. Halley, , Phys. Rev. E 96, 062402 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    J. W. Halley, Some Factors from Theory, Simulation, Ex- periment and Proteomes in the Current Biosphere Sup- porting Deep Oceans as the Location of the Origin of Terrestrial Life. Life 12, Issue 9, 1330 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Qianyi Sheng, B. F. Intoy and J. W. Halley, ”Effects of Activation Barriers on Quenching to Stabilize Prebiotic Chemical Systems” , Life 14 , Issue 1, 116 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    B. F. Intoy, A. Wynveen and J. W. Halley, Phys. Rev. E 94, 042424 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    Details are in Appendix III

    and varied λ,f0 and r0 to fit the model to the ob- servations. Details are in Appendix III. It turns out that f0 seems well established but that r0 and the tempera- tures are subject to large uncertainties as a result of this analysis. The data used for the distribution of ∆ va...

  20. [28]

    Hypothesis: Origin of life in deep-reaching tectonic faults

    Schreiber, U.; Locker-Gr¨ utjen, O.; Mayer, C. Hypothesis: Origin of life in deep-reaching tectonic faults. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 2012, 42, 47–54

    2012

  21. [29]

    E. L. Shock, T. McCollom and M. D. Schultz in Ther- mophiles: The Keys to Molecular Evolution and the Ori- gin of Life?,J. Weigerl anM. W. W. Adams, editors, Tay- lor and Francis (1998)

    1998

  22. [30]

    Izabela Sibilska, Yu Feng, Lingjun Li, John Yin ,Origin s of Life and Evolution of Biospheres 48, 277–287 (2018)

    2018

  23. [31]

    Ei-ichi Imai, Hajime Honda, Kuniyuki Hatori, Andre Brack,Koichiro Matsuno,Science 283,831 (1999)

    1999

  24. [32]

    Yoshiaki Ogata, Ei-ichi Imai, Hajime Honda, Kuniyuki Hatori and Koichiro Matsuno,Origins of Life and Evolu- tion of the Biosphere 30: 527–537, (2000)

    2000

  25. [33]

    Hideaki Tsukahara, Ei-Ichi Imai, Kajime Honda, Ku- niyuki Hatori and Koichiro Matsuno,Origins of Life and 9 Evolution of the Biosphere 32: 13–21, (2002)

    2002

  26. [34]

    Organic Geochemistry 2014,66 98–106

    Shigeshi Fuchida Yuki Mizuno , Harue Masuda , Tomo- hiro Toki , Hiroko Makita, O, Concentrations and dis- tributions of amino acids in black and white smoker flu- ids at temperatures over 200 °C. Organic Geochemistry 2014,66 98–106

    2014

  27. [35]

    Hydrothermal Processes

    German, C., Seyfried, W.E., Jr., 2014. Hydrothermal Processes. In: Holland, H.D., Turekian, K.K. (Eds.), Treatise on Geochemistry, Second Edition. Oxford: Else- vier, pp. 191-233 (2014)

    2014

  28. [36]

    B. F. Intoy and J. W. Halley PHYSICAL REVIEW E 99, 062419 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    S. A. Kauffman, The Origins of Order, Oxford University Press, New York,(1993) Chapter 7

    1993

  30. [38]

    Doyne Farmer, S

    J. Doyne Farmer, S. A. Kauffman and N. H. Packard, Physica 22D, 50-67 (1986);R. Bagley and J. D. Farmer, In ”Artificial Life II”, eds. C. G.Langton, C. Taylor, J. D. Farmer and S. Rasmussen, Addison Wesley, Red- wood City (1991) p. 93. ;R. Bagley and J. D. Farmer, In ”Artificial ...

    1986

  31. [39]

    Kyle Siegrist, LibreTexts Statistics https://stats.libretexts.org/ section 11.5 (2022)

    2022

  32. [40]

    Kohn, Ian S

    Jonathan E. Kohn, Ian S. Millett, Jaby Jacob, Bojan Zagrovic, Thomas M. Dillon, Nikolina Cingel, Robin S. Dothager, Soenke Seifert, P. Thiyagarajan, Tobin R. Sos- nick, M. Zahid Hasan, Vijay S. Pande, Ingo Ruczinski, Sebastian Doniach, and Kevin W. Plaxco Random-coil Behavior ...

    2005

  33. [41]

    R. B. Martin. Free energies and equilibria of peptide bond hydrolysis and formation. Biopolymers, 45(5):351– 353, 1998

    1998

  34. [42]

    Smith and David E

    Robert M. Smith and David E. Hansen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 8910-8913 (1998)

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.