Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 100 references

Acoustic angular sorting of resonant subwavelength particles

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Two crossed ultrasound beams of different frequencies deflect each small particle at an angle set by its acoustic resonance, so a mixed population sorts itself by size.

desk verdict Acoustic transfer of optical angular sorting with solid parametric analysis, but the unquantified neglect of bichromatic beat forces leaves the central formula on an untested idealization. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.04386 v2 pith:45S24D6A submitted 2025-01-08 physics.class-ph

Ivan Toftul , Yuri Kivshar , Mikhail Lapine This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.class-ph PACS 43.25.Qp43.20.Fn
keywords acousticradiationforceangularsortingMieresonancessubwavelengthparticlesultrasoundparticlemanipulationpressurecrosssectionresonantscatteringseparation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes an all-acoustic way to sort small particles by size: send two plane ultrasound waves of different frequencies at an angle to each other, and let the particles' own resonances do the sorting. For a resonant particle, each wave exerts a radiation-pressure force whose magnitude depends strongly on particle size relative to the wavelength, so the two forces are unequal and their vector sum points at an angle that encodes the size. The central formula, $\gamma=\arctan\!\left(\frac{F_2-F_1}{F_1+F_2}\tan\vartheta\right)$, maps a particle to a deflection direction determined by the ratio of the two forces. The authors map this sorting angle over size parameter $ak_0$ and frequency detuning $\Delta k/k_0$, showing how losses and material contrasts, especially high compressibility contrast, set the usable size window and reliability. If the mechanism works as calculated, it gives a cheap, tunable, continuous sorting tool for particles roughly from centimetres down to micrometres.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the acoustic Mie scattering coefficient $a_n(ka,\bar\rho,\bar\beta)$ for a sphere, whose poles are the particle's acoustic resonances; from it the pressure cross section $\sigma^{\mathrm{pres}}=-\frac{4\pi}{k^2}\sum_n[(2n+1)\mathrm{Re}(a_n)+2(n+1)\mathrm{Re}(a_n^*a_{n+1})]$ gives the radiation-pressure force $F=\bar{k}p_0^2\beta\sigma^{\mathrm{pres}}/2$. These forces are substituted into the geometric lever formula $\gamma=\arctan((F_2-F_1)/(F_1+F_2)\tan\vartheta)$, which turns a force ratio into an angle. The argument also uses the Mie-angle representation $a_n=-\cos\phi_n e^{i\phi_n}$ to obtain force limits and the Kerker and anti-Kerker conditions, and the resonance condition $\sqrt{\bar\rho}\,j_n(k_pa)h_n^{(1)\prime}(ka)=\sqrt{\bar\beta}\,j_n'(k_pa)h_n^{(1)}(ka)$ to locate resonances and their Q-factors. A stated simplifying assumption is that the bichromatic interference terms at the difference frequency are negligible, so the total force is the sum of two independent single-frequency forces.

What would settle it

Directly measure the deflection angle $\gamma$ of one resonant particle, such as an air bubble in water or an aerogel sphere in air, in two crossed ultrasound beams over a range of detuning $\Delta k/k_0$, intensities, and relative phases of the sources; if the observed angle departs from $\arctan((F_2-F_1)/(F_1+F_2)\tan\vartheta)$ computed from separately measured single-beam forces, or if the angle becomes time- or phase-dependent, the superposition assumption is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that angular sorting of subwavelength particles can be achieved acoustically by exploiting the size- and frequency-dependent acoustic radiation pressure on a Mie-resonant sphere. Using two plane waves with different wavenumbers $k_1,k_2$ propagating at opening angle $2\vartheta$, each wave exerts force $F_i=\bar{k}_i p_0^2\beta\,\sigma^{\mathrm{pres}}_i/2$ on the particle, where $\sigma^{\mathrm{pres}}$ is the pressure cross section built from acoustic Mie coefficients. Since the particle's resonance structure makes $F_1$ and $F_2$ differ in a size-specific way, the net force deviates from the median axis by $\gamma=\arctan((F_2-F_1)/(F_1+F_2)\tan\vartheta)$. Hence particle size, or more precisely the frequency dependence of the particle's resonance, is converted into a spatial direction, so a mixed population fans out into angular channels and can be collected by size. The paper supports this with parametric maps over size and detuning, a study of loss effects, and material-specific examples including air bubbles in water, aerogel spheres in air, and SF$_6$ bubbles in air.

Load-bearing premise

The sorting-angle formula assumes the total force on the particle is the simple sum of two independent single-frequency radiation forces, with the interference terms oscillating at the frequency difference between the beams neglected; if those terms are not negligible, the deflection angle is no longer a static function of particle size.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A mixed population of resonant particles fans out into angular channels, so particles can be collected in separate bins; choosing the average wavenumber $k_0$ and detuning $\Delta k/k_0$ selects which size window is resolved.
  • Dissipation, usually a nuisance, broadens resonances and flattens the angle-size map, removing the ambiguity where several sizes share one drift direction; low-loss setups give sharper angles but need more careful calibration.
  • Sorting works best when the particle is much more compressible than the host, such as air bubbles in water, making water-based operation especially attractive for practical implementation.
  • The method does not require tight focusing or phase coherence between the two beams, so large volumes can be processed with simple, inexpensive, frequency-tunable ultrasound sources.
  • Because the mechanism sorts by resonant response rather than by a pre-calibrated size, it can be adapted to arbitrary particles once their acoustic resonance pattern is known.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An immediate experimental check would be to measure the deflection angle of a single bubble or aerogel sphere and compare it with Eq. (6); if the angle depends on beam intensity or on the phase relation between the two sources, the neglected bichromatic interference term would need to be restored.
  • The same force-ratio-to-angle conversion could be combined with dynamically swept detuning to build a continuous sorter that reconfigures in real time for different size ranges, an extension the paper mentions but does not develop.
  • The asymmetry between density and compressibility contrasts is acoustic-specific; it suggests that engineered soft inclusions, such as acoustic metamaterial particles, could create sorting maps unreachable with natural materials.
  • The geometric angle formula is not inherently acoustic; the practical advantage of this scheme is the easy tunability and low cost of ultrasound, while the force calculation carries over to any wave type with Mie-like resonances.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an acoustic analogue of angular optical sorting: two plane waves of different frequencies, propagating symmetrically about a median axis, exert radiation forces F1 and F2 on a spherical Mie-resonant particle, and the ratio of these forces determines a drift angle γ (Eq. (6)). The authors compute acoustic Mie coefficients and pressure cross-sections from standard formulas, present parametric maps of γ as a function of the size parameter ak0 and the relative detuning Δk/k0, study the effect of dissipation, and give material-specific examples (SF6 bubble in air, aerogel in air, air bubble in water). They conclude that high compressibility contrast is the most favourable condition for angular sorting and that losses can reduce sorting ambiguity.

Significance. If the central prediction survives scrutiny, the paper offers a useful and practical extension of prior optical sorting work [26] to acoustics, with advantages in cost, tunability, and accessible particle-size range. The formalism is based on established acoustic Mie theory, no output quantity is fitted, and the material parameters are taken from independent references; the only adjustable parameter is the loss parameter ε, inferred from literature attenuation data. The paper is also candid about several idealizations and lists limitations in the Conclusions. The main weakness is that the central static deflection angle rests on an unquantified neglect of bichromatic interference terms, and the key equation contains a typographical error. These issues are correctable in revision and do not undermine the underlying formalism.

major comments (2)
  1. [Eq. (6)] The denominator in the arctangent is written as F2+F2, which is not the intended sum of the two force magnitudes; it should be F1+F2. Since Eq. (6) is the central sorting formula from which the deflection-angle maps in Fig. 2 and the subsequent discussion are derived, this typo must be corrected and the plots should be checked against the corrected expression.
  2. [Section III (immediately after Eq. (6))] The paper dismisses the bichromatic interference terms oscillating at Δω = c_s(k1−k2) with a single sentence, but this assumption is load-bearing. The static deflection angle in Eq. (6) is only the observable angle if the beat period 2π/Δω is much shorter than the time a particle spends in the overlap region and the oscillating force component is much smaller than |F1| and |F2|. Neither condition is quantified. If the beat period is comparable to the transit time, or if the oscillating force is not small, particles entering at different beat phases will follow different trajectories and smear the sorting angle. A trajectory integration, or at least an order-of-magnitude comparison of the beat timescale and force amplitude, is needed to validate the central claim.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Introduction, first paragraph] The phrase 'manipulation of of micro-' contains a duplicated 'of'.
  2. [Section IV heading] The heading 'SORTING EFFICENCY' should be 'SORTING EFFICIENCY'.
  3. [Section IV, fourth paragraph] 'Bugger's law' should be 'Bouguer's law' (or 'Beer–Lambert law').
  4. [Section III, third paragraph] 'theses two parameters' should be 'these two parameters'.
  5. [Fig. 5 caption] 'isotorpic' should be 'isotropic', and there is a missing space between 'scattered' and 'incident' in the caption text.
  6. [Title and abstract] The term 'subwavelength' should be qualified, since the resonances used in Fig. 3 appear at size parameters up to ka ≈ 3, where the particle radius is comparable to or larger than the wavelength.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the sorting-angle map is a forward calculation from standard acoustic Mie theory with independent material parameters.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained in the relevant sense. The predicted sorting angle gamma in Eq. (6) is obtained by vector addition of two force magnitudes F1 and F2, each computed from Eq. (2) using the acoustic Mie coefficients of Eq. (4). Those coefficients follow from the boundary-value problem solved in Appendix A, and the force formula follows from the momentum-flux integral in Appendix B, citing standard results such as Yosioka-Kawasima and Hasegawa. The material parameters in Table I are taken from independent literature, and the loss parameter epsilon is retrieved from measured attenuation coefficients, not from any sorting outcome. The plotted map gamma(ak0, Delta k/k0) is therefore a forward evaluation: no output quantity is fed back into the input, and no fitted value is renamed as a prediction. The self-citations [15,48,51] appear for the radiation-force and Mie-angle formalism, but they are accompanied by independent standard references and are not the sole support of any central equation; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work. The neglect of the bichromatic interference terms in Section III after Eq. (6) is an explicitly stated approximation with citations [70,71], and the limitations listed in Section V are acknowledged physical caveats. These are modeling concerns, not definitional equivalences, so no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard acoustic scattering theory and a set of stated idealizations. The most consequential are the independent-beam superposition and the neglect of the viscous boundary layer, both acknowledged in the text. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Loss parameter epsilon = 0.01 for Fig. 4; derived from attenuation delta (Table I) for material examples
    Ad hoc model: both beta and rho are given the same fractional imaginary part epsilon, chosen to match published attenuation coefficients. It controls resonance widths and sorting ambiguity but is not fitted to any sorting measurement.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Standard acoustic Mie scattering theory, Eqs. (1)-(4) and (A1)-(A4)
    The force and cross-section formulas are taken from established acoustics references [55-58,78]; the central computations rely on these.
  • domain assumption Plane-wave beams wider than the particle
    Section II: particles are assumed small compared to the beam width so each beam can be treated as a plane wave.
  • domain assumption Negligible bichromatic interference
    Section III: the total force is taken as the sum of independent forces from the two beams; interference terms at Delta omega are assumed negligible.
  • domain assumption Negligible viscous Stokes layer
    Section II: boundary layer thickness assumed much smaller than the particle radius, so frequency-dependent viscous dissipation is neglected.
  • domain assumption Spherical particle shape
    Section I: spherical shape is assumed so resonances and forces are analytically tractable; extension to non-spherical particles is claimed but not shown.
  • domain assumption Bubble idealizations: no surface tension, no nonlinear oscillations
    Section IV: for the bubble examples, surface tension and nonlinear oscillations are neglected, though acknowledged as important in practice.
  • standard math Energy conservation identity Re(a_n)+|a_n|^2=0 for passive scatterers
    Section II: used to derive the bounds (5) and the Mie-angle representation; strictly valid for lossless particles, while the paper also treats lossy cases with complex parameters, creating a mild inconsistency.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Acoustic angular sorting of resonant subwavelength particles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/45S24D6A

@misc{pith2026250104386,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Acoustic angular sorting of resonant subwavelength particles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/45S24D6A}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.04386}
}
read the original abstract

We suggest a dynamical mechanism for angular sorting of subwavelength particles in accord with their resonances and sizes, realised with the forces imposed by acoustic (ultrasound) waves with different wavelengths. We analyse how the acoustic force acting on a small particle depends on its size relative to the ultrasound wavelength, and how the detuning between the two different beams influences the size range and angular distribution for unambiguous sorting outcomes for a given size range. We predict a range of scenarios depending on the particular materials and provide several feasible examples and discuss their practical realisation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.04386 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Theoretical setup of the considered sorting scheme: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Concept of the dynamical angular sorting. The para [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Three distinct examples of the normalized pressure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Normalized pressure cross section for fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Mie scattering problem in acoustics. Incident plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [26]

    Shilkin, E

    D. Shilkin, E. Lyubin, M. Shcherbakov, M. Lapine, and A. Fedyanin, Directional optical sorting of silicon nanoparticles, ACS Photonics 4, 2312 (2017)

    work page 2017

  2. [1]

    Treuel, K

    L. Treuel, K. Eslahian, D. Docter, T. Lang, R. Zellner, K. Nienhaus, G. Nienhaus, R. Stauber, and M. Maskos, Physicochemical characterization of nanoparticles and their behavior in the biological environment, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 16, 15053 (2014)

    2014

  3. [2]

    J. J. Rennick, A. P. R. Johnston, and R. G. Parton, Key principles and methods for studying the endocyto- sis of biological and nanoparticle therapeutics, Nature Nanotechnology 16, 266 (2021)

    2021

  4. [3]

    Anastasiadis, K

    S. Anastasiadis, K. Chrissopoulou, E. Stratakis, P. Ka- vatzikidou, G. Kaklamani, and A. Ranella, How the physicochemical properties of manufactured nanomate- rials affect their performance in dispersion and their ap- plications in biomedicine: a review, Nanomaterials 12, 10.3390/nano12030552 (2022)

    work page doi:10.3390/nano12030552 2022

  5. [4]

    J. Wu, Z. Zhu, W. Liu, Y. Zhang, Y. Kang, J. Liu, C. Hu, R. Wang, M. Zhang, L. Chen, and L. Shao, How nanoparticles open the paracellular route of biological barriers: mechanisms, applications, and prospects, ACS Nano 16, 15627 (2022)

    2022

  6. [5]

    V. E. Babicheva and A. B. Evlyukhin, Mie-resonant metaphotonics, Adv. Opt. Photonics 16, 539 (2024)

    2024

  7. [6]

    Kowalczyk, I

    B. Kowalczyk, I. Lagzi, and B. A. Grzybowski, Nanosep- arations: strategies for size and/or shape-selective pu- rification of nanoparticles, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 16, 135 (2011)

    2011

  8. [7]

    Imasaka, Y

    T. Imasaka, Y. Kawabata, T. Kaneta, and Y. Ishidzu, Optical chromatography, Anal. Chem. 67, 1763 (1995)

    1995

Show all 100 references
  1. [8]

    Contado and R

    C. Contado and R. Argazzi, Size sorting of citrate re- duced gold nanoparticles by sedimentation field-flow fractionation, J. Chromatogr. A 1216, 9088 (2009)

    2009

  2. [9]

    M. L. Mastronardi, F. Hennrich, E. J. Henderson, F. Maier-Flaig, C. Blum, J. Reichenbach, U. Lemmer, C. K¨ ubel, D. Wang, M. M. Kappes, and G. A. Ozin, Preparation of monodisperse silicon nanocrystals using density gradient ultracentrifugation, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 11928 (2011)

    2011

  3. [10]

    Y. Xie, J. Rufo, R. Zhong, J. Rich, P. Li, K. W. Leong, and T. J. Huang, Microfluidic isolation and enrichment of nanoparticles, ACS Nano 14, 16220 (2020)

    2020

  4. [11]

    Jon´ aˇ s and P

    A. Jon´ aˇ s and P. Zem´ anek, Light at work: the use of op- tical forces for particle manipulation, sorting, and anal- ysis, Electrophoresis 29, 4813 (2008)

    2008

  5. [12]

    B. W. Drinkwater, Dynamic-field devices for the ultra- sonic manipulation of microparticles, Lab Chip 16, 2360 (2016)

    2016

  6. [13]

    Kolesnik, M

    K. Kolesnik, M. Xu, P. V. S. Lee, V. Rajagopal, and D. J. Collins, Unconventional acoustic approaches for lo- calized and designed micromanipulation, Lab Chip 21, 2837 (2021)

    2021

  7. [14]

    Dholakia, B

    K. Dholakia, B. W. Drinkwater, and M. Ritsch-Marte, Comparing acoustic and optical forces for biomedical research, Nat Rev Phys 2, 480 (2020)

    2020

  8. [15]

    Toftul, S

    I. Toftul, S. Golat, F. J. Rodr ´ ıguez-Fortu˜ no, F. Nori, Y. Kivshar, and K. Y. Bliokh, Radiation forces and torques in optics and acoustics, arXiv 10.48550/arXiv.2410.23670 (2024), 2410.23670

    2024 doi arXiv

  9. [16]

    D. A. Shilkin, E. V. Lyubin, I. V. Soboleva, and A. A. Fedyanin, Trap position control in the vicinity of re- flecting surfaces in optical tweezers, JETP Lett. 98, 644 (2014)

    2014

  10. [17]

    Y. Ren, Q. Chen, M. He, X. Zhang, H. Qi, and Y. Yan, Plasmonic optical tweezers for particle manipulation: principles, methods, and applications, ACS Nano 15, 6105 (2021)

    2021

  11. [18]

    M. A. Sirotin, M. N. Romodina, E. V. Lyubin, I. V. Soboleva, I. V. Soboleva, and A. A. Fedyanin, Single-cell all-optical coherence elastography with optical tweezers, Biomed. Opt. Express 13, 14 (2022)

    2022

  12. [19]

    Ng and C

    J. Ng and C. T. Chan, Size-selective optical forces for microspheres using evanescent wave excitation of whis- pering gallery modes, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 251109 (2008)

    2008

  13. [20]

    Nieto-Vesperinas, R

    M. Nieto-Vesperinas, R. Gomez-Medina, and J. J. Saenz, Angle-suppressed scattering and optical forces on submicrometer dielectric particles, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, JOSAA 28, 54 (2011)

    2011

  14. [21]

    N. O. L¨ ank, P. Johansson, and M. K¨ all, Directional scat- tering and multipolar contributions to optical forces on silicon nanoparticles in focused laser beams, Opt. Ex- press 26, 29074 (2018)

    2018

  15. [22]

    X. Xu, M. Nieto-Vesperinas, C.-W. Qiu, X. Liu, D. Gao, Y. Zhang, and B. Li, Kerker-type intensity-gradient force of light, Laser Photonics Rev. 14, 1900265 (2020)

    2020

  16. [23]

    Shi, L.-M

    Y. Shi, L.-M. Zhou, A. Q. Liu, M. Nieto-Vesperinas, T. Zhu, A. Hassanfiroozi, J. Liu, H. Zhang, D. P. Tsai, H. Li, W. Ding, W. Zhu, Y. F. Yu, A. Mazzulla, G. Cip- parrone, P. C. Wu, C. T. Chan, and C.-W. Qiu, Super- hybrid mode-enhanced optical torques on Mie-resonant particle...

    2022

  17. [24]

    Ploschner, T

    M. Ploschner, T. ˇCiˇ zm´ ar, M. Mazilu, A. di Falco, and K. Dholakia, Bidirectional optical sorting of gold nanoparticles, Nano Lett. 12, 1923 (2012)

    2012

  18. [25]

    Andres-Arroyo, B

    A. Andres-Arroyo, B. Gupta, F. Wang, J. J. Gooding, and P. J. Reece, Optical manipulation and spectroscopy of silicon nanoparticles exhibiting dielectric resonances, 9 Nano Lett. 16, 1903 (2016)

    2016

  19. [27]

    R. F. Marchington, M. Mazilu, S. Kuriakose, V. Garc´ es- Ch´ avez, P. J. Reece, T. F. Krauss, M. Gu, and K. Dho- lakia, Optical deflection and sorting of microparticles in a near-field optical geometry, Opt. Express 16, 3712 (2008)

    2008

  20. [28]

    Lin and K

    S. Lin and K. B. Crozier, An integrated microparticle sorting system based on near-field optical forces and a structural perturbation, Opt. Express 20, 3367 (2012)

    2012

  21. [29]

    Z. Li, S. Zhang, L. Tong, P. Wang, B. Dong, and H. Xu, Ultrasensitive size-selection of plasmonic nanoparticles by Fano interference optical force, ACS Nano 8, 701 (2014)

    2014

  22. [30]

    D. A. Shilkin and A. A. Fedyanin, Optical levitation of Mie-resonant silicon particles in the field of bloch surface electromagnetic waves, JETP Lett. 115, 136 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    B. Shi, Y. Cao, T. Zhu, H. Li, Y. Zhang, R. Feng, F. Sun, and W. Ding, Multiparticle resonant optical sorting using a topological photonic structure, Photon- ics Res. 10, 297 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Bulgakov and A

    E. Bulgakov and A. Sadreev, Precise size sorting of nanoparticles by bound states in the continuum in a dual finite grating, Opt. Lett. 48, 4705 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    M. P. MacDonald, G. C. Spalding, and K. Dholakia, Microfluidic sorting in an optical lattice, Nature 426, 421 (2003)

    2003

  26. [34]

    Sajeesh and A

    P. Sajeesh and A. K. Sen, Particle separation and sorting in microfluidic devices: a review, Microfluid. Nanofluid. 17, 1 (2014)

    2014

  27. [35]

    Y. Shi, T. Zhu, K. T. Nguyen, Y. Zhang, S. Xiong, P. H. Yap, W. Ser, S. Wang, C.-W. Qiu, C. T. Chan, and A. Q. Liu, Optofluidic microengine in a dynamic flow environment via self-induced back-action, ACS Photon- ics 7, 1500 (2020)

    2020

  28. [36]

    Babaliari, A

    E. Babaliari, A. Ranella, and E. Stratakis, Microflu- idic systems for neural cell studies, Bioengineering 10, 10.3390/bioengineering10080902 (2023)

    2023 doi

  29. [37]

    M. Wu, A. Ozcelik, J. Rufo, Z. Wang, R. Fang, and T. Jun Huang, Acoustofluidic separation of cells and particles, Microsyst. Nanoeng. 5, 1 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Hossein and P

    F. Hossein and P. Angeli, A review of acoustofluidic sep- aration of bioparticles, Biophys. Rev. 15, 2005 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Stringer, Z

    M. Stringer, Z. Zeng, X. Zhang, Y. Chai, W. Li, J. Zhang, H. Ong, D. Liang, J. Dong, Y. Li, Y. Fu, and X. Yang, Methodologies, technologies, and strate- gies for acoustic streaming-based acoustofluidics, Appl. Phys. Rev. 10, 10.1063/5.0134646 (2023)

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    Y. Wei, X. Lu, J. Bao, S. Zhang, and D. Wu, Acoustic- based microbubble grippers for automatic on-chip selec- tion of spherical microrobot models, Adv. Mater. Tech- nol. 9, 2301455 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    P. L. Marston, Shape oscillation and static deformation of drops and bubbles driven by modulated radiation stresses—Theory, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67, 15 (1980)

    1980

  34. [42]

    P. L. Marston and R. E. Apfel, Quadrupole resonance of drops driven by modulated acoustic radiation pres- sure—Experimental properties, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67, 27 (1980)

    1980

  35. [43]

    P. L. Marston, Comment on oscillatory optical and acoustical radiation pressure, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra- diat. Transfer 254, 107226 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    P. L. Marston, Position dependence of the standing- wave radiation pressure quadrupole projection on a sphere applied to drop shape, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 156, 1586 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    P. L. Marston, Negative axial radiation forces on solid spheres and shells in a Bessel beam, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122, 3162 (2007)

    2007

  38. [46]

    T. J. Asaki and P. L. Marston, Acoustic radiation force on a bubble driven above resonance, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96, 3096 (1994)

    1994

  39. [47]

    G. T. Silva, Acoustic radiation force and torque on an absorbing compressible particle in an inviscid fluid, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 136, 2405 (2013), 1307.4705

    2013 arXiv

  40. [48]

    I. D. Toftul, K. Y. Bliokh, M. I. Petrov, and F. Nori, Acoustic radiation force and torque on small particles as measures of the canonical momentum and spin densities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 183901 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    X. D. Fan and L. Zhang, Trapping force of acousti- cal bessel beams on a sphere and stable tractor beams, Physical Review Applied 11, 1 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    Sepehrirahnama, S

    S. Sepehrirahnama, S. Oberst, Y. K. Chiang, and D. A. Powell, Willis coupling-induced acoustic radiation force and torque reversal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 174501 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Smagin, I

    M. Smagin, I. Toftul, K. Y. Bliokh, and M. Petrov, Acoustic lateral recoil force and stable lift of anisotropic particles, Phys. Rev. Appl. 22, 064041 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    G. Lu, E. Ding, Y. Wang, X. Peng, J. Cui, X. Liu, and X. Liu, Realization of acoustic wave directivity at low frequencies with a subwavelength Mie resonant struc- ture, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 123507 (2017)

    2017

  45. [53]

    Zhang, Y

    J. Zhang, Y. Cheng, and X. Liu, Tunable directional subwavelength acoustic antenna based on Mie reso- nance, Scientific Reports 8, 1 (2018)

    2018

  46. [54]

    F. Liu, S. Zhang, L. Luo, W. Li, Z. Wang, and M. Ke, Superscattering of sound by a deep-subwavelength solid mazelike rod, Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 064063 (2019)

    2019

  47. [55]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Fluid mechanics (course of theoretical physics, vol. 6) (Elsevier, 2013)

    2013

  48. [56]

    Hasegawa, Comparison of two solutions for acoustic radiation pressure on a sphere, J

    T. Hasegawa, Comparison of two solutions for acoustic radiation pressure on a sphere, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61, 1445 (1977)

    1977

  49. [57]

    Yosioka and Y

    K. Yosioka and Y. Kawasima, Acoustic radiation pres- sure on a compressible sphere, Acustica 5, 167 (1955)

    1955

  50. [58]

    D. T. Blackstock, Fundamentals of physical acoustics (John Wiley & Sons, 2000)

    2000

  51. [59]

    Rahimzadegan, R

    A. Rahimzadegan, R. Alaee, C. Rockstuhl, and R. W. Boyd, Minimalist Mie coefficient model, Opt. Express 28, 16511 (2020)

    2020

  52. [60]

    H. C. van de Hulst, Light Scattering by Small Particles (Dover Publications, New York, 1981)

    1981

  53. [61]

    Zhang and P

    L. Zhang and P. L. Marston, Acoustic radiation torque and the conservation of angular momentum (L), The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 129, 1679 (2011)

    2011

  54. [62]

    Zhang and P

    L. Zhang and P. L. Marston, Acoustic radiation force expressed using complex phase shifts and momentum- transfer cross sections, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 140, EL178 (2016)

    2016

  55. [63]

    P. L. Marston and L. Zhang, Relationship of scatter- ing phase shifts to special radiation force conditions for spheres in axisymmetric wave-fields, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 141, 3042 (2017). 10

    2017

  56. [64]

    P. L. Marston, Contrast factor for standing-wave radiation forces on spheres: Series expansion in powers of sphere radius, JASA Express Lett. 4, 10.1121/10.0027928 (2024)

    2024 doi

  57. [65]

    H.-W. Wu, W. Li, S.-L. Cheng, Y.-Q. Yin, and Z.-Q. Sheng, Acoustic generalized Kerker effect, Appl. Phys. Express 14, 095501 (2021)

    2021

  58. [66]

    Wei and F

    L. Wei and F. J. Rodr ´ ıguez-Fortu˜ no, Far-field and near- field directionality in acoustic scattering, New J. Phys. 22, 083016 (2020)

    2020

  59. [67]

    Rahimzadegan, R

    A. Rahimzadegan, R. Alaee, I. Fernandez-Corbaton, and C. Rockstuhl, Fundamental limits of optical force and torque, Physical Review B 95, 1 (2017), arXiv:1605.03945

    2017 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Umnova, K

    O. Umnova, K. Attenborough, H. C. Shin, and A. Cum- mings, Deduction of tortuosity and porosity from acous- tic reflection and transmission measurements on thick samples of rigid-porous materials, Applied Acoustics66, 607 (2005)

    2005

  61. [69]

    Zhang and P

    L. Zhang and P. L. Marston, Acoustic radiation torque on small objects in viscous fluids and connection with viscous dissipation, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 136, 2917 (2014)

    2014

  62. [70]

    G. T. Silva, S. Chen, and L. P. Viana, Parametric Am- plification of the Dynamic Radiation Force of Acoustic Waves in Fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 234301 (2006)

    2006

  63. [71]

    M. C. Morrell, J. E. Lee, and D. G. Grier, Spectral holo- graphic trapping: Creating dynamic force landscapes with polyphonic waves, Phys. Rev. E 109, 044901 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    G. S. K. Wong, Speed of sound in standard air, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79, 1359 (1986)

    1986

  65. [73]

    V. A. Del Grosso and C. W. Mader, Speed of sound in pure water, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 52, 1442 (1972)

    1972

  66. [74]

    A. Ba, A. Kovalenko, C. Arist´ egui, O. Mondain-Monval, and T. Brunet, Soft porous silicone rubbers with ultra- low sound speeds in acoustic metamaterials, Sci. Rep. 7, 1 (2017)

    2017

  67. [75]

    Mazrouei-Sebdani, H

    Z. Mazrouei-Sebdani, H. Begum, S. Schoenwald, K. V. Horoshenkov, and W. J. Malfait, A review on sil- ica aerogel-based materials for acoustic applications, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 562, 120770 (2021)

    2021

  68. [76]

    Moretti, F

    E. Moretti, F. Merli, E. Cuce, and C. Buratti, Thermal and acoustic properties of aerogels: preliminary investi- gation of the influence of granule size, Energy Procedia 111, 472 (2017)

    2017

  69. [77]

    A. J. Zuckerwar and G. S. K. Wong, Handbook of the speed of sound in real gases (Academic Press, London, England, UK, 2002)

    2002

  70. [78]

    E. G. Williams, Fourier Acoustics Sound Radiation & Nearfield Acoustical Holography (Elsevier, San Diego, 1999)

    1999

  71. [79]

    Li and C

    J. Li and C. T. Chan, Double-negative acoustic meta- material, Phys. Rev. E 70, 055602 (2004)

    2004

  72. [80]

    Z. G. Nicolaou and A. E. Motter, Mechanical metama- terials with negative compressibility transitions, Nat. Mater. 11, 608 (2012)

    2012

  73. [81]

    Farhat, P.-Y

    M. Farhat, P.-Y. Chen, and H. Ba˘ gcı, Localized acoustic surface modes, Appl. Phys. A 122, 377 (2016)

    2016

  74. [82]

    K. Y. Bliokh and F. Nori, Transverse spin and sur- face waves in acoustic metamaterials, Physical Review B 020301, 1 (2019)

    2019

  75. [83]

    Ambati, N

    M. Ambati, N. Fang, C. Sun, and X. Zhang, Surface resonant states and superlensing in acoustic metamate- rials, Phys. Rev. B 75, 195447 (2007)

    2007

  76. [84]

    C. M. Park, J. J. Park, S. H. Lee, Y. M. Seo, C. K. Kim, and S. H. Lee, Amplification of acoustic evanescent waves using metamaterial slabs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 194301 (2011)

    2011

  77. [85]

    Cselyuszka, M

    N. Cselyuszka, M. Seˇ cujski, and V. Crnojevi´ c Bengin, Compressibility-near-zero acoustic metamaterial, Phys. Lett. A 378, 1153 (2014)

    2014

  78. [86]

    Fok and X

    L. Fok and X. Zhang, Negative acoustic index metama- terial, Phys. Rev. B 83, 214304 (2011)

    2011

  79. [87]

    S. H. Lee, C. M. Park, Y. M. Seo, Z. G. Wang, and C. K. Kim, Acoustic metamaterial with negative den- sity, Phys. Lett. A 373, 4464 (2009)

    2009

  80. [88]

    H. H. Huang, C. T. Sun, and G. L. Huang, On the neg- ative effective mass density in acoustic metamaterials, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 47, 610 (2009)

    2009

  81. [89]

    S. H. Lee and O. B. Wright, Origin of negative density and modulus in acoustic metamaterials, Phys. Rev. B 93, 024302 (2016)

    2016

  82. [90]

    Fan, W.-w

    L. Fan, W.-w. Yu, S.-y. Zhang, H. Zhang, and J. Ding, Zak phases and band properties in acoustic metamate- rials with negative modulus or negative density, Phys. Rev. B 94, 174307 (2016)

    2016

  83. [91]

    P. L. Marston, Axial radiation force of a Bessel beam on a sphere and direction reversal of the force, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 3518 (2006)

    2006

  84. [92]

    Zhang and P

    L. Zhang and P. L. Marston, Geometrical interpretation of negative radiation forces of acoustical Bessel beams on spheres, Phys. Rev. E 84, 035601 (2011)

    2011

  85. [93]

    S. Xu, C. Qiu, and Z. Liu, Transversally stable acous- tic pulling force produced by two crossed plane waves, Europhys. Lett. 99, 44003 (2012)

    2012

  86. [94]

    C. E. M. D´ emor´ e, P. M. Dahl, Z. Yang, P. Glynne-Jones, A. Melzer, S. Cochran, M. P. MacDonald, and G. C. Spalding, Acoustic tractor beam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 174302 (2014)

    2014

  87. [95]

    F. G. Mitri, Acoustical pulling force on rigid spheroids in single Bessel vortex tractor beams, Europhys. Lett. 112, 34002 (2015)

    2015

  88. [96]

    F. G. Mitri, Dynamic acoustic tractor beams, J. Appl. Phys. 117, 10.1063/1.4914064 (2015)

    2015 doi

  89. [97]

    Y. Meng, X. Li, Z. Liang, J. Ng, and J. Li, Acoustic pulling with a single incident plane wave, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 014089 (2020)

    2020

  90. [98]

    Wang, R.-Y

    N. Wang, R.-Y. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Robust acoustic pulling using chiral surface waves, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 024034 (2021)

    2021

  91. [99]

    L. P. Gor’kov, On the forces acting on a small particle in an acoustical field in an ideal fluid, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 6, 773 (1962)

    1962

  92. [100]

    P. J. Westervelt, The Theory of Steady Forces Caused by Sound Waves, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 23, 312 (1951)

    1951

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.