Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Where, What, Whether: Multi-modal Learning Meets Pedestrian Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.10880 v1 pith:46FWEL4D submitted 2020-12-20 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords pedestriandetectionocclusionscaletextbftextitcaltechcitypersons
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Pedestrian detection benefits greatly from deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs). However, it is inherently hard for CNNs to handle situations in the presence of occlusion and scale variation. In this paper, we propose W$^3$Net, which attempts to address above challenges by decomposing the pedestrian detection task into \textbf{\textit{W}}here, \textbf{\textit{W}}hat and \textbf{\textit{W}}hether problem directing against pedestrian localization, scale prediction and classification correspondingly. Specifically, for a pedestrian instance, we formulate its feature by three steps. i) We generate a bird view map, which is naturally free from occlusion issues, and scan all points on it to look for suitable locations for each pedestrian instance. ii) Instead of utilizing pre-fixed anchors, we model the interdependency between depth and scale aiming at generating depth-guided scales at different locations for better matching instances of different sizes. iii) We learn a latent vector shared by both visual and corpus space, by which false positives with similar vertical structure but lacking human partial features would be filtered out. We achieve state-of-the-art results on widely used datasets (Citypersons and Caltech). In particular. when evaluating on heavy occlusion subset, our results reduce MR$^{-2}$ from 49.3$\%$ to 18.7$\%$ on Citypersons, and from 45.18$\%$ to 28.33$\%$ on Caltech.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools