Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 67 references

Features of stimulated luminescence of solid nitrogen

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Tetranitrogen ions tied to nitrogen ice's infrared glow

desk verdict New 810 nm band and correlated TSL/TSEE/NsL are solid; the N4+ attribution is a reasonable but unproven hypothesis. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.05861 v1 pith:46I7GRVH submitted 2025-01-10 physics.chem-ph

M.A. Bludov , I.V. Khyzhniy , S.A. Uyutnov , G.B. Gumenchuk , E.V. Savchenko This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-ph
keywords solidnitrogengamma-seriestetranitrogencationN4+thermallystimulatedluminescencenonstationaryexoelectronemissionneutralizationreactionsnear-infraredspectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper investigates the origin of a long-unidentified near-infrared emission in solid nitrogen: the gamma-series, three closely spaced bands at 794, 802, and 810 nm. The authors show that the bands appear at the same wavelengths in spontaneous and stimulated luminescence, that the 810 nm band is detected in stimulated luminescence for the first time, and that the glow curves of all three bands track each other and the yield of thermally stimulated exoelectron emission. They interpret this correlation as evidence that the gamma-series is produced by a neutralization reaction rather than by electron attachment to nitrogen atoms. The key new observation is that in the 5 to 20 K range the nonstationary luminescence of the gamma-line follows that of the 0-4 band of the $a'^1\Sigma_u^- \to X^1\Sigma_g^+$ transition, which previous work assigned as a fingerprint of the tetranitrogen cation N$_4^+$. This leads the authors to propose that the gamma-series arises from neutralization of N$_4^+$ via the 'cage effect,' in which the electron capture produces an excited neutral N$_4$ that radiates instead of dissociating, while noting that the measured vibrational spacing of the series does not match current calculations for the most likely N$_4$ structure.

What carries the argument

The central object is the gamma-series, a group of three near-infrared emission bands (794, 802, and 810 nm) with a regular spacing of roughly 125 cm$^{-1}$. The mechanism that carries the argument is the 'cage effect' scenario for neutralization: N$_4^+$ captures a thermally released electron to form a highly excited N$_4^{**}$; instead of dissociating as it does in the 'cage exit' channel, the excited tetranitrogen is held together by a dissociation barrier (calculated at about 6.5 kcal/mol for the $1^1B_{3u}$ state of the $D_{2h}$ isomer) and relaxes radiatively, emitting the near-infrared photon and leaving neutral N$_4$. The experimental tool that links the gamma-series to this mechanism is correlated nonstationary luminescence, which records the emission from selected bands while the sample is slowly heated under an electron beam; the low-temperature match between the gamma-line curve and the N$_4^+$ fingerprint curve is the load-bearing observation.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be to measure the isotopic shift of the gamma-series in a solid grown from $^{15}$N$_2$: a genuine N-N vibrational progression with a spacing near 125 cm$^{-1}$ should shift by the expected reduced-mass factor, whereas a series of unrelated electronic transitions would not; failure to observe the predicted shift would disprove the assignment of the three bands to a single nitrogen-containing emitter such as N$_4$ produced by cage-effect neutralization.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the three near-infrared bands of the gamma-series in solid nitrogen share a common origin in the neutralization of the tetranitrogen cation N$_4^+$, most plausibly through the 'cage effect' channel in which electron capture forms an excited neutral N$_4$ that relaxes radiatively. Evidence offered includes the coincident positions of the three bands in cathodoluminescence and thermally stimulated luminescence, the mutual correlation of their glow curves with exoelectron emission, the absence of correlation with the emission of excited N($^2D$) atoms (which rules out the older N$^-$ anion model), and the low-temperature correlation of gamma-line nonstationary luminescence with the N$_4^+$ fingerprint emission. The authors state that the identification is not definitive because the observed 125 cm$^{-1}$ spacing between the bands is far smaller than the 469 cm$^{-1}$ harmonic frequency calculated for the N$_4$($D_{2h}$) isomer, leaving the question open.

Load-bearing premise

The whole argument rests on the assumption that low-temperature nonstationary luminescence at the 0-4 band of the $a'^1\Sigma_u^- \to X^1\Sigma_g^+$ transition is an unambiguous marker of dissociative recombination of N$_4^+$; if that assignment is wrong or is contaminated by another process, the proposed connection between the gamma-series and N$_4^+$ loses its evidential support.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The newly detected 810 nm band becomes part of the gamma-series, so any future model of the emitter must explain all three bands and their regular 125 cm$^{-1}$ spacing, not just the main line.
  • The anti-correlation between the alpha-group (N($^2D$) emission) and the gamma-series weakens the long-standing N$^-$ anion hypothesis and reinforces the neutralization channel for these bands.
  • If the gamma-series is tied to N$_4^+$ neutralization, then the yield of these bands should depend on the concentration of trapped electrons and N$_4^+$ centers, linking radiation dose and storage conditions to the near-infrared emission.
  • The close energy match (1.56 eV observed vs 1.55 eV predicted) keeps open the possibility that the gamma-series is the radiative decay of a neutral tetranitrogen compound, but the frequency mismatch (125 vs 469 cm$^{-1}$) means the specific isomer is not established.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the cage-effect assignment is correct, the gamma-series is the first spectroscopic signature of neutral N$_4$ formed by neutralization in the bulk solid, which would make solid nitrogen a test bed for studying high-energy-density nitrogen species at cryogenic temperatures.
  • The paper's correlation strategy could be extended to pump-probe experiments that deliberately populate or depopulate electron traps, which would sharpen the 5-20 K correlation and distinguish the N$_4^+$ neutralization channel from atomic diffusion channels that dominate above 20 K.
  • A search for the gamma-series in nitrogen-rich astrophysical ice analogs under electron irradiation could reveal whether this neutralization channel contributes to unidentified infrared emissions from cold interstellar and outer-solar-system ices.
  • The 125 cm$^{-1}$ spacing matching the calculated frequency of the open-chain N$_4^+$ cation rather than neutral N$_4$ hints that the emitting state might be ionic or charge-transfer in nature; testing this requires high-resolution lifetime measurements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports near-infrared cathodoluminescence (CL), thermally stimulated luminescence (TSL), thermally stimulated exoelectron emission (TSEE), and non-stationary luminescence (NsL) measurements on electron-irradiated solid nitrogen. It identifies a gamma-group in the NIR TSL spectra composed of bands at 794, 802, and 810 nm, with the 810 nm band in stimulated luminescence reported for the first time. The authors show that the TSL glow curves of the three bands correlate with one another and with the TSEE yield, suggesting a common origin connected with electron-neutralization reactions. The main interpretive claim is that the low-temperature (5-20 K) NsL curve of the gamma-line correlates with the NsL curve of the 0-4 band of the a'^1Sigma_u^- -> X^1Sigma_g^+ transition of N2, which is called a fingerprint of N4+ dissociative recombination from previous work [35]; this correlation is interpreted as evidence for a possible connection between the gamma-line and N4+ neutralization via a cage-effect scenario. The authors explicitly hedge the assignment and acknowledge an unresolved discrepancy between the measured vibrational spacing (125 cm^-1) and the calculated value for N4(D2h) (469 cm^-1).

Significance. If the N4+ connection holds, the paper would provide a rare experimental signature of tetranitrogen cation neutralization in bulk solid nitrogen, relevant to radiation physics and to the broader question of polynitrogen species. The experimental strengths are the correlated TSL/TSEE measurements, the first detection of the 810 nm stimulated band, and the explicit test against the alternative N^- attachment model via the alpha/gamma intensity comparison. The paper is also commendably cautious in framing the N4+ scenario as 'possible' rather than definitive. However, the central evidence is correlational and relies on an inherited definition of the N4+ fingerprint, and several quantitative details (spectral sensitivity correction, error bars, and a quantitative correlation measure) are absent. The significance is therefore conditional on strengthening the mechanistic support.

major comments (4)
  1. [Results and discussion, Fig. 6] The central interpretive step is the correlation in Fig. 6 between the gamma-line NsL and the 0-4 band of a'^1Sigma_u^- -> X^1Sigma_g^+, which is called the 'fingerprint' of N4+ [35]. However, both signals are electron-stimulated: the NsL technique releases trapped electrons by heating, and those electrons can drive neutralization of any cation. Two emissions will therefore track a common electron-detrapping rate even if they arise from different cations. The manuscript lists several other routes to the a' state, such as N(2D)+N(2D) recombination and N3+ dissociative recombination, but it does not quantify their contributions in the 5-20 K range, nor does it provide a control measurement. To support the N4+ assignment, please provide a quantitative correlation statistic over the stated range, uncertainty estimates, and an explicit argument that the low-temperature a'-X emission is dominated by N4+ recombination rather than by another cation or by neutral-pair emission.
  2. [Results and discussion, N4(D2h) discussion] The proposed cage-effect scenario, reaction (6), requires that the gamma-series be the radiative transition of neutral N4. The measured line energy (1.56 eV) is close to the predicted 11B3u -> 1Ag transition energy (1.55 eV), but the experimental harmonic frequency (125 cm^-1) is roughly a factor of four below the calculated value for N4(D2h) (469 cm^-1) and instead matches the ionic N4+ Cs form (123 cm^-1). The authors acknowledge this discrepancy, yet the conclusion that the gamma-series 'indicates a probable connection' with N4+ neutralization via the cage effect is stronger than the current evidence. This internal inconsistency should either be resolved with calculations for the open-chain N4 isomer or with a discussion of matrix effects, or the identification of the emitting species should be presented as strictly tentative.
  3. [Experimental and Results and discussion, Figs. 2 and 3] The statement in Experimental that the spectra were not corrected for spectral sensitivity directly affects the quantitative intensity comparisons used to argue against the N^- attachment model. The ratios I(alpha)/I(gamma) = 4.1 and 3.5 at 1.5 and 0.5 keV, and 3.2 and 3.5 for thin and thick films, compare emission near 523 nm with emission near 794 nm, where the instrumental response can differ substantially. Without a correction or at least a characterization of the wavelength-dependent response, these ratios are not quantitative evidence. Please provide corrected spectra or state explicitly how the conclusions would be affected by the unknown spectral response.
  4. [Figs. 4-6] No error bars, wavelength calibration accuracy, or number of replicate runs are reported for the TSL, TSEE, and NsL curves. The claims that the three gamma-series components correlate (Fig. 5) and that the low-temperature NsL curves have coincident maxima (Fig. 6) are therefore based on visual inspection alone. A simple quantitative measure, such as peak temperatures with uncertainties and a correlation coefficient computed over the stated temperature range, would make the central correlation testable and would allow the reader to assess the strength of the N4+ connection.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Experimental] The term 'subthreshold energy' is used in the Abstract and Introduction without definition; specify from the first mention that this means below the knock-on defect threshold of about 1.5 keV for solid N2.
  2. [Fig. 1] The horizontal axis in Fig. 1 runs from 100 to 800 nm, while the text says the spectrum extends up to 900 nm; make the axis and the text consistent.
  3. [References] Reference [23] appears to combine a journal citation (R. Tian and J. Michl, Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 86, 113 (1988)) with a NIST URL; separate the bibliographic entry from the online data resource.
  4. [References] References [34] and [54] are the same source (C. Ning and Y. Lu, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 51, 021502 (2022)) and should be consolidated.
  5. [Terminology throughout] The terms 'fingerprint', 'marker', and '0-4 band of the a'-X transition' are used interchangeably for the same diagnostic; define the terminology once at first use.
  6. [Results and discussion, final paragraphs] In the final discussion of the measured frequency, please clarify the factor-of-five comparison: 125 cm^-1 is essentially equal to the calculated N4+ Cs frequency (123 cm^-1) but approximately five times the characteristic van der Waals frequency; the presentation should distinguish these two references explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the new TSL/NsL measurements are direct data, and the only self-cited element is the prior N4+ 'fingerprint' assignment, which is load-bearing but hedged and not a derivation-level reduction.

full rationale

The paper's chain is: (i) the three γ-group TSL bands correlate with each other and with TSEE, indicating a neutralization-related common origin; (ii) the γ-line NsL curve correlates with the NsL at the a'1Σu- → X1Σg+ 0-4 band in the 5-20 K range; (iii) invoking the authors' prior assignment [35] that this a'-X band is a 'fingerprint' of N4+ dissociative recombination, the paper suggests a possible connection of the γ-band with N4+ neutralization via the cage-effect scenario. Steps (i) and (ii) are newly measured, direct experimental observations; no parameter is fitted to the conclusion, and no prediction is generated from an equation that already contains the answer. The only same-author, load-bearing input is the identification of the a'-X emission as an N4+ marker from [35]. That is a prior experimental result reported in a separate publication, not a redefinition of the γ-band in terms of the marker, and it is externally falsifiable. The paper also explicitly hedges the conclusion with 'possible connection' and points out that the measured harmonic frequency (125 cm-1) is far from the N4(D2h) calculated value (469 cm-1), leaving the origin of the γ-group as an open question. The independent theoretical energy comparison (1.56 eV measured vs 1.55 eV predicted, [38]) provides some support, while the admitted frequency mismatch weakens it. The alternative explanation that both NsL curves track the same electron-detrapping rate rather than a shared N4+ precursor is a correctness risk, not a circularity. One missing-support note: the text cites '(supporting information)' on p. 10 without the SI being present, but this does not affect circularity. Score 2 reflects the minor self-citation in the interpretive marker; the central experimental content is self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities are proposed and no parameters are fitted to the data. The load-bearing assumptions are experimental identification criteria, particularly the N4+ fingerprint from prior work.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The 0-4 band of the a'1Sigma_u- to X1Sigma_g+ transition in NsL is a fingerprint of N4+ dissociative recombination.
    Invoked in Results to interpret the correlation in Fig. 6; the fingerprint was established in the authors' previous paper [35] and is not independently re-derived here.
  • domain assumption Solid nitrogen has high electron mobility in the alpha-phase, so TSEE reflects processes in the bulk of the film, not only at the surface.
    Used in Experimental to justify TSEE as a bulk probe; based on Ref [41].
  • domain assumption Electron beam energies below 1.5 keV do not create defects via knock-on collisions.
    The subthreshold irradiation condition is used to ensure the measured effects are due to electronic excitation, not displacement damage.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Features of stimulated luminescence of solid nitrogen." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/46I7GRVH

@misc{pith2026250105861,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Features of stimulated luminescence of solid nitrogen},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/46I7GRVH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.05861}
}
abstract

Recent results on the study of spontaneous and stimulated luminescence of solid nitrogen in the near-infrared NIR range are presented. Irradiation was performed with an electron beam of subthreshold energy in the dc mode. Three series of experiments were performed: (i) measurement of cathodoluminescence CL at different electron energies on samples of different thicknesses, (ii) measurements of thermally stimulated luminescence TSL in combination with thermally stimulated exoelectron emission TSEE from pre-irradiated samples and (iii) recording of non-stationary luminescence curves NsL at selected wavelengths during gradual heating of samples under an electron beam. Three emission bands were recorded in the NIR TSL spectra of solid N$_2$: 794, 802, and 810 nm which form the $\gamma$-group. The band at 810 nm in stimulated luminescence was detected for the first time. The positions of all three spectral features coincide in the spectra of spontaneous and stimulated luminescence, as evidenced by a comparison of the CL spectrum recorded at 5 K with the TSL spectrum recorded at the TSL maximum at 16 K. The glow curves measured for these 3 bands were found to correlate with each other and with the TSEE yield. This finding indicates common origin of these bands and their connection with the neutralization reaction. The correlation of the $\gamma$-band NsL in the range of low temperatures (5-20 K) with the NsL measured at the 0-4 band of the $a'^1\Sigma_u^- \rightarrow X^1\Sigma_g^+$ transition, which is the ''fingerprint'' of the tetranitrogen cation N$_4^+$, points to possible connection of the $\gamma$-band with the neutralization of N$_4^+$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.05861 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. CL spectra of solid nitrogen in the visible and NIR ranges recorded upon irradiation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. CL spectra of solid nitrogen recorded for samples of 30 nm (red curve online) and 200 μm upon excitation with 0.5 keV electron beam at 5 K. A comparison of the CL spectra obtained under different conditions as it is shown above indicates that there is no complete correlation in the behavior of the α and γ bands, which could be expected in the case of the formation of the γ-line emitting centers via electron attachme… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Comparison of the γ-series in the CL spectrum recorded at 5 K with the TSL (red curve online) spectrum recorded at the TSL maximum at 16 K [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: TSL at the wavelengths of the components of th [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Nonstationary luminescence curves measured at the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [35]

    Savchenko, I.V

    E.V. Savchenko, I.V. Khyzhniy, S.A. Uyutnov, A.P. Barabashov, G.B. Gumenchuk, M.K. Beyer, A.N. Ponomaryov, and V.E. Bondybey, J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 2475 (2015) http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp5087575

    work page doi:10.1021/jp5087575 2015

  2. [1]

    Clark, R

    N. Clark, R. Carlson, W. Grundy, K. Noll, Observed Ices in the Solar System, in: M.S. Gudipati, J. Castillo-Rogez (Eds.), The Science of Solar System Ices; Astrophysics and Space Science Library: Springer, New York (2012) Vol. 356, pp 3-46

    work page 2012

  3. [2]

    Hudson and M.H

    R.L. Hudson and M.H. Moore, Astrophys. J. 568, 1095 (2002)

    work page 2002

  4. [3]

    Jamieson and R.I

    C.S. Jamieson and R.I. Kaiser, Chem. Phys. Lett. 440, 98 (2007)

    work page 2007

  5. [4]

    Palumbo, G.A

    M.E. Palumbo, G.A. Baratta, D. Fulvio, M. Garozzo, O. Gomis, G. Leto, F. Spinella and G. Strazzulla, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 101, 012002 (2008), doi:10.1088/1742-6596/101/1/012002

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/101/1/012002 2008

  6. [5]

    Wu, C.Y.R

    Y-J. Wu, C.Y.R. Wu, S-L. Chou, M-Y.Lin, H-C. Lu, J-I. Lo, B-M. Cheng, Astrophys. J. 746, 175 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [6]

    Boduch, A

    Ph. Boduch, A. Domaracka, D. Fulvio, T. Langlinay, X.Y. Lv, M.E. Palumbo, H. Rothard and G. Strazzulla, Astronomy & Astrophysics A, 544, A30 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [7]

    Y.J. Wu, H.F. Chen, S.J. Chuang, T.P. Huang, Astrophys. J., 768 (1), 83 (2013)

    work page 2013

Show all 67 references
  1. [8]

    de Barros, E.F

    A L.F. de Barros, E.F. da Silveira, A. Bergantini, H. Rothard, and P. Boduch, Astrophys. J. 810, 156 (2015)

    2015

  2. [9]

    Materese, D.P

    C.K. Materese, D.P. Cruikshank, S.A. Sandford, H. Imanaka, and M. Nuevo, Astrophys. J. 812 150 (2015), doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/812/2/150

    2015 doi

  3. [10]

    Rice, Edwin A

    Thomas S. Rice, Edwin A. Bergin, Jes K. Jørgensen, and S. F. Wampfler, Astrophys. J., 866, 156 (2018) DOI 10.3847/1538-4357/aadfdb

    2018 doi

  4. [11]

    Salama, E

    F. Salama, E. Sciamma-O'Brien, C. Contreras, S. Bejaoui, Recent Progress in Laboratory Astrophysics Achieved with NASA Ames’ COSmIC Facility, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union, S332, 364, (2018)

    2018

  5. [12]

    Amarsi, N

    A.M. Amarsi, N. Grevesse, J. Grumer, M. Asplund, P.S. Barklem and R. Collet, Astronomy & Astrophysics 636, A120 (2020)

    2020

  6. [13]

    Nguyen, Coord

    M.T. Nguyen, Coord. Chem. Rev. 244, 93 (2003)

    2003

  7. [14]

    Brinck, M

    T. Brinck, M. Bittererová, and H. Östmark, Electronic structure calculations as a tool in the quest for experimental verification of N4, in Energetic Materials, Part 1: Decomposition, Crystal and Molecular Properties, P.A. Politzer and J.S. Murray (Editors) Theoretical and Com...

    2003

  8. [15]

    Samartzis and A.M

    P.C. Samartzis and A.M. Wodtke, Inter. Rev. Phys. Chem., 25, 527 (2006), DOI:10.1080/01442350600879319

    2006 doi

  9. [16]

    Zarko, Combustion, Explos

    V.E. Zarko, Combustion, Explos. Shock Waves, 46, 121 (2010)

    2010

  10. [17]

    Adeniyi, Phys

    Yansun Yao, Adebayo O. Adeniyi, Phys. Stat. Solidi b, 258, 2000588 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.202000588

    2021 doi

  11. [18]

    Savchenko, I

    E. Savchenko, I. Khyzhniy, V. Bondybey, Low Temp. Phys. 45, 975 (2019)

    2019

  12. [19]

    E.M. Hörl, J. Molec. Spectrosc., 3, 425 (1959)

    1959

  13. [20]

    Peyron, E.M

    M. Peyron, E.M. Hörl, H.W. Brown, H.P. Broida, J. Chem. Phys. 30, 1304–1310 (1959), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1730176

    1959 doi

  14. [21]

    Shoen and H.P

    L.J. Shoen and H.P. Broida, J. Chem. Phys., 32 1184 (1960)

    1960

  15. [22]

    Boltnev, I.B

    R.E. Boltnev, I.B. Bykhalo, I.N. Krushinskaya, A.A. Pelmenev, V.V. Khmelenko, D.M. Lee, I.V. Khyzhniy, S.A. Uyutnov, E.V. Savchenko, A.N. Ponomaryov, G.B. Gumenchuk and V.E. Bondybey, Low Temp. Phys., 39, 580 (2013)

    2013

  16. [23]

    Tian and J

    R. Tian and J. Michl, Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc, 86, 113 (1988). https://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/ASD/lines1.pl?holdings=1&spectra=N_I

    1988

  17. [24]

    Peyron and H.P

    M. Peyron and H.P. Broida, J. Chem. Phys. 30, 1304 (1959). 13

    1959

  18. [25]

    Khmelenko, I

    V.V. Khmelenko, I. N. Krushinskaya, R. E. Boltnev and D. M. Lee, J. of Physics: Conference Series, 400, 012030 (2012)

    2012

  19. [26]

    Khmelenko, A.A

    V.V. Khmelenko, A.A. Pelmenev, I.N. Krushinskaya, I.B. Bykhalo, R.E. Boltnev and D.M. Lee, J. Low Temp.Phys., 171, 302 (2013)

    2013

  20. [27]

    Khmelenko, I.N

    V.V. Khmelenko, I.N. Krushinskaya, R.E. Boltnev, I.B. Bykhalo, A.A. Pelmenev and D.M. Lee, Low Temp. Phys., , 38, 871 (2012)

    2012

  21. [28]

    Boltnev, I.B

    R.E. Boltnev, I.B. Bykhalo, I.N. Krushinskaya, A.A. Pelmenev, V.V. Khmelenko, S. Mao, A. Meraki, S. Wilde, P.T. McColgan and D.M. Lee, J. Phys. Chem. A, 119, 2438 (2015)

    2015

  22. [29]

    Boltnev, I.B

    R.E. Boltnev, I.B. Bykhalo, I.N. Krushinskaya, A.A. Pelmenev, S. Mao, A. Meraki, P.T. McColgan, D.M. Lee and V.V. Khmelenko, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 18, 16013 (2016)

    2016

  23. [30]

    Savchenko, I.V

    E.V. Savchenko, I.V. Khyzhniy, S.A. Uyutnov, M.A. Bludov, Low Temp. Phys. 50, 89 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1063/10.0023897

    2024 doi

  24. [31]

    Mitiyasu Miyasita, Katsuhiko Higuchi, Masahiko Higuchi, Journal of Modern Physics, 2, 1161 (2011) doi:10.4236/jmp.2011.210144

    2011

  25. [32]

    Cowan, C.F

    R.D. Cowan, C.F. Fischer, J.E. Hansen and V. Kempter, J. Phys. B 30, 1457 (1997)

    1997

  26. [33]

    Andersen, Atomic negative ions: structure, dynamics and collisions, Physics Reports 394, 157 (2004)

    T. Andersen, Atomic negative ions: structure, dynamics and collisions, Physics Reports 394, 157 (2004)

    2004

  27. [36]

    Bondybey, M

    V.E. Bondybey, M. Räsänen, A. Lammers, Annu. Rep. Sect. C 95, 331 (1999)

    1999

  28. [37]

    Apkarian, N

    V.A. Apkarian, N. Schwentner, Chem. Rev., 99, 1481 (1999)

    1999

  29. [38]

    Bittererová, H

    M. Bittererová, H. Östmark, and T. Brinck, Chem. Phys. Lett. 347, 220 (2001)

    2001

  30. [39]

    Allodi, R.A

    M.A. Allodi, R.A. Baragiola, G.A. Baratta, M.A. Barucci, G.A. Blake, J.R. Brucato, C. Contreras, S.H. Cuylle, Ph. Boduch, D. Fulvio, M.S. Gudipati, S. Ioppolo, Z. Kaňuchová, A. Lignell, H. Linnartz, M.E. Palumbo, U. Raut, H. Rothard, F. Salama, E.V. Savchenko, E. Sciamma-O'Bri...

    2013

  31. [40]

    Khyzhniy, E

    I. Khyzhniy, E. Savchenko, S. Uyutnov, G. Gumenchuk, A. Ponomaryov, V. Bondybey, Radiation Measurements, 45, 353 (2010), DOI:10.1016/j.radmeas.2009.11.020

    2010 doi

  32. [41]

    Storchak, D.G

    V.G. Storchak, D.G. Eshchenko, J.H. Brewer, S.P. Cottrell, S.F.J. Cox, E. Karlsson, R.W. Wappling, J. Low Temp. Phys. 122, 527 (2001)

    2001

  33. [42]

    Savchenko, I.V

    E.V. Savchenko, I.V. Khyzhniy, S.A. Uyutnov, A.N. Ponomaryov, G.B. Gumenchuk, V.E. Bondybey, Procedia Physics, 76, 111 (2015), DOI:10.1016/j.phpro.2015.10.021

    2015 doi

  34. [43]

    Savchenko, I.V

    E.V. Savchenko, I.V. Khyzhniy, S.A. Uyutnov, M.A. Bludov, A.P. Barabashov, G.B. Gumenchuk and V.E. Bondybey, J. Luminescence, 191, 73, (2017) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2016.12.055

    2017 doi

  35. [44]

    Oehler, D

    O. Oehler, D. A. Smith, and K. Dressler, J. Chem. Phys. 66, 2097 (1977)

    1977

  36. [45]

    Status Solidi (c) 12, 49-54 (2015), DOI: 10.1002/pssc.201400166

    Elena Savchenko, Ivan Khyzhniy, Sergey Uyutnov, Andrey Barabashov, Galina Gumenchuk, Alexey Ponomaryov and Vladimir Bondybey, Phys. Status Solidi (c) 12, 49-54 (2015), DOI: 10.1002/pssc.201400166. 14

    2015 doi

  37. [46]

    Savchenko, I

    E. Savchenko, I. Khyzhniy, S. Uyutnov, M. Bludov, A. Barabashov, G. Gumenchuk and V. Bondybey, J. Low Temp. Phys., 187, 62 (2017), DOI: 10.1007/s10909-016- 1706-6

    2017 doi

  38. [47]

    McColgan, A

    P.T. McColgan, A. Meraki, R.E. Boltnev, D.M. Lee, and V.V. Khmelenko, J. Phys. Chem. A 121, 9045 (2017)

    2017

  39. [48]

    Bass and H.P

    A.M. Bass and H.P. Broida, Eds., Formation and trapping of free radicals, Academic Press, New York, 1960

    1960

  40. [49]

    Hammoutène, J

    M.Hochaf, H.Ndome, and D. Hammoutène, J. Chem. Phys., 132, 104310 (2010)

    2010

  41. [50]

    Zhaunerchyk, W

    V. Zhaunerchyk, W. D. Geppert, E. Vigren, M. Hamberg, M. Danielsson, m. Larsson, R. D. Thomas, M. Kaminska, F. Österdahl, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 014305 (2007)

    2007

  42. [51]

    Adams,P.K

    A. Adams,P.K. Hansma, Phys.Rev. B 22 4258 (1980)

    1980

  43. [52]

    Elena Savchenko, Ivan Khyzhniy, Sergey Uyutnov, Mikhail Bludov, Galina Gumenchuk and Vladimir Bondybey, Physica Status Solidi B, 253, 2115 (2016) DOI: 10.1002/pssb.201600406

    2016 doi

  44. [53]

    Jia, E.A

    H.-P. Jia, E.A. Quadrelli, Chem. Soc. Rev., 43, 547 (2014)

    2014

  45. [54]

    C. Ning, Y. Lu, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 51, 021502 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0080243

    2022 doi

  46. [55]

    Loveland, P.G

    R.J. Loveland, P.G. Le Comber, W.E. Spear, Phys. Rev. B, 6, 3121 (1972)

    1972

  47. [56]

    Randenlya, X

    L.K. Randenlya, X. K. Zeng, R.S. Smith, M.A. Smith, J. Phys. Chem., 93, 8031 (1989)

    1989

  48. [57]

    Pedrys, D.J

    R. Pedrys, D.J. Oostra,A. Haring, A.E. de Vries, J. Schou, Radiat. Eff. Defects Solids, 109, 239 (1989)

    1989

  49. [58]

    Johnson, J

    R.E. Johnson, J. Schou, Mat.-Fys. Medd.-K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk., 43, 403 (1993)

    1993

  50. [59]

    Elesin, N.N

    V.F. Elesin, N.N. Degtyarenko, K.S. Pazhitnykh, N.V. Matveev,. Russ. Phys. J., 52, 1224 (2009)

    2009

  51. [60]

    Rennie and P

    E. Rennie and P. Mayer, J. Chem. Phys., 120, 10561 (2004)

    2004

  52. [61]

    Knight, K.D

    L.B. Knight, K.D. Johannessen, D.C. Cobranchi, E.A. Earl, D. /Feller, E.R. Davidson, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 885 (1987)

    1987

  53. [62]

    Thompson, M.E

    W.E. Thompson, M.E. Jacox, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 3856 (1990)

    1990

  54. [63]

    Yu-Jong Wu (private communication)

  55. [64]

    Delannoy, B

    D.D. Delannoy, B. Tribollet, F. Valadier, A. Erbeia, J. Chem. Phys. 68, 2252 (1978)

    1978

  56. [65]

    Adrian, Phys

    F.J. Adrian, Phys. Rev., 127, 837 (1962)

    1962

  57. [66]

    Leibin, D.S

    I.V. Leibin, D.S. Bezrukov, and A.A. Buchachenko, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 26, 958 (2024)

    2024

  58. [67]

    Lofthus, P.H

    A. Lofthus, P.H. Krupenie, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 6, 113 (1977)

    1977

  59. [68]

    Brocklehurst and G.C

    B. Brocklehurst and G.C. Pimentel, J. Chem. Phys. 36, 2040 (1962); doi:10.1063/1.1732825

    1962 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.