REVIEW 3 cited by
Which features of quantum physics are not fundamentally quantum but are due to indeterminism?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
What is fundamentally quantum? We argue that most of the features, problems, and paradoxes -- such as the measurement problem, the Wigner's friend paradox and its proposed solutions, single particle nonlocality, and no-cloning -- allegedly attributed to quantum physics have a classical analogue if one is to interpret classical physics as fundamentally indeterministic. What really characterizes non-classical effects are incompatible physical quantities, which, in quantum quantum theory are associated to the fundamental constant $\hbar$.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Classical and quantum mechanics across representations: an operational reading of the Wigner Weyl correspondence
The robust classical–quantum boundary across Wigner–Weyl representations is noncommutative star-multiplication, not negativity or the choice of phase-space versus Hilbert-space language.
-
A Classical Analogue of Entanglement for a Kicked Top
Classical mutual information between phase-space subsystems of a kicked top grows at about half the Lyapunov exponent in chaotic regions and slowly in regular regions, mirroring known signatures of bipartite entanglement.
-
Is there any Trinity of Gravity, to start with?
The teleparallel equivalents of general relativity are reformulations with unobservable extra structures, so there is no geometric trinity of gravity.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.