Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 38 references

Suppression of Intertwined Density Waves in La$_4$Ni$_{3-x}$Cu$_x$O$_{10+\delta}$

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Copper substitution suppresses intertwined density waves in a trilayer nickelate and partially decouples their spin and charge parts.

desk verdict A careful, useful Cu-substitution phase diagram for La4Ni3O10 with a plausible but not fully proven spin-charge decoupling claim; the Hall-based carrier-delocalization argument deserves scrutiny but does not sink the paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.08756 v2 pith:4A3FHMIR submitted 2025-07-11 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con

classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.supr-con PACS 75.30.Fv71.27.+a72.15.Gd
keywords nickelatesuperconductivitydensitywavespin-chargedecouplingchemicalsubstitutionHalleffecttrilayerRuddlesden-PoppercarrierdelocalizationLa4Ni3O10
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that substituting copper for nickel in the trilayer nickelate La4Ni3O10 suppresses its intertwined spin- and charge-density-wave order in a controlled, linear way. The density-wave transition temperature falls by about 13.8 K for every 1% of copper, and the resistive anomaly disappears above x≈0.15 while a magnetic susceptibility signature lingers until x≈0.3. The measured Hall carrier concentration rises by roughly two orders of magnitude more than oxygen nonstoichiometry can account for, implying that melting the density wave releases previously localized holes. No superconductivity appears for copper contents up to x=0.7, suggesting that suppressing the density waves alone is not enough to stabilize the superconducting state.

What carries the argument

The central object is the trilayer Ruddlesden-Popper nickelate La4Ni3-xCuxO10+δ, whose intertwined spin-density wave (SDW) and charge-density wave (CDW) can be tracked by kinks in resistivity and magnetic susceptibility. The paper uses the minimum in dρ/dT to define Tdw and the corresponding kink in χ(T) to follow the magnetic component, while Hall effect at 1.8 K gives the carrier density and thermogravimetric analysis gives oxygen stoichiometry. The key comparison is the linear suppression of Tdw versus x, its match with the pressure-suppression rate, and the divergence between transport and magnetic signatures at intermediate x, which is the evidence for spin-charge decoupling.

What would settle it

A neutron or muon measurement on La4Ni2.7Cu0.3O10+δ that finds no incommensurate magnetic order and no diffuse spin correlations would falsify the claim of surviving short-range spin correlations; alternatively, detecting a copper-oxide or nickel-oxide impurity phase that accounts for the susceptibility kink, or showing that the Hall carrier density changes strongly with oxygen annealing, would undermine the carrier-delocalization argument.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In La4Ni3-xCuxO10+δ, copper substitution acts as a chemical tuning knob for the intertwined density wave order of the parent compound. The authors find a linear suppression rate of Tdw ≈ -13.8 K per 1% Cu (R²=0.98), with resistive and magnetic signatures staying in agreement at low x. Above x≈0.15 the resistivity anomaly is no longer detectable, yet the magnetic susceptibility kink persists until x≈0.3, which the authors interpret as a partial decoupling of charge and spin components with short-range spin correlations surviving. Hall measurements at 1.8 K show a carrier concentration that rises linearly with x and then plateaus exactly where the magnetic anomaly vanishes, and thermogravimetric analysis shows that oxygen uptake contributes too little to explain the carrier increase. The absence of superconductivity across the whole series is contrasted with pressure experiments, pointing to the structural transition from monoclinic P21/a to tetragonal I4/mmm as an additional requirement.

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation relies on the susceptibility kink being a true spin-density-wave signature and on the low-temperature Hall count measuring carriers freed by density-wave melting rather than impurity or band-structure effects.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The density-wave order in La4Ni3O10 can be tuned continuously by chemical substitution, providing a route to study the phase diagram without high pressure.
  • At x between 0.15 and 0.3, a regime exists with no detectable charge-order resistive anomaly but a persistent magnetic signature, indicating a window of partially decoupled spin and charge degrees of freedom.
  • The jump in mobile carrier concentration upon density-wave suppression can be much larger than nominal doping, so transport experiments should account for delocalized carriers.
  • Because no superconductivity appears despite full density-wave suppression, the monoclinic-to-tetragonal structural transition likely plays an essential role in stabilizing the superconducting state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the surviving susceptibility kink indeed reflects short-range spin correlations, neutron and muon experiments on x≈0.2–0.3 samples should find broad, inelastic magnetic scattering rather than a sharp magnetic Bragg peak.
  • The coincidence between the carrier-density plateau and the disappearance of the magnetic anomaly suggests that the Hall concentration at 1.8 K could serve as a bulk thermodynamic-like probe of density-wave melting in related nickelates.
  • The linear suppression rate of about -13.8 K per 1% Cu is close to the pressure rate of about -13 K/GPa; if the mechanism is lattice compression, applying pressure to a lightly Cu-substituted sample might mimic higher pressure and possibly reach superconductivity at lower pressures.
  • A testable extension would be to measure the optical conductivity or Seebeck coefficient across x to independently confirm the delocalization of carriers and identify whether the released holes form a coherent metallic state.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a systematic Cu-substitution study of polycrystalline La4Ni3-xCuxO10+δ (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.7) using resistivity, magnetic susceptibility, Hall effect, TGA, and TEM. The density-wave transition temperature Tdw decreases approximately linearly with Cu content at a rate of about -13.8 K per 1% Cu (R² = 0.98), and the resistive anomaly is nearly suppressed by x ≈ 0.15-0.20, while a magnetic susceptibility anomaly persists until x ≈ 0.3. The Hall carrier concentration at 1.8 K increases with x and plateaus near x ≈ 0.3, coinciding with the full suppression of the magnetic anomaly. No superconductivity is observed across the series. The authors interpret these observations as evidence for partial spin-charge decoupling of the density wave and for carrier delocalization caused by density-wave suppression.

Significance. If substantiated, the paper provides a useful ambient-pressure chemical tuning route for the intertwined density waves in trilayer nickelates, and its phase diagram offers empirical constraints on the competition between density-wave order and superconductivity in pressurized La4Ni3O10. The systematic series, the cross-correlated transport and magnetization determinations of Tdw, the quantitative linear suppression slope, and the explicit reporting of secondary-phase formation at high x are valuable strengths. The central observations are direct measurements, and no model fitting or derived parameters are used to define the main phase-diagram result.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results, Fig. 2c and Discussion ("One potential explanation")] The quantitative claim that Cu substitution releases roughly 10^22 cm^-3 mobile carriers, two orders of magnitude beyond what oxygen nonstoichiometry can supply, rests on the single-band Hall expression n = 1/(eR_H) evaluated only at 1.8 K. In a multiband metal with a reconstructed Fermi surface, R_H is set by the balance of electron and hole pockets and their mobilities, not simply by carrier density, and Cu-induced disorder (which visibly broadens the resistive transition in Fig. 1) can change mobilities independently. The paper reports neither R_H(T) nor R_H(B), and no two-band or mobility analysis is performed, so the specific mechanism of carrier delocalization is not uniquely supported by the data. I recommend providing field- and temperature-dependent Hall measurements, assessing multiband/mobility effects, and propagating uncertainties in δ before drawing the delocalization conclusion.
  2. [Results, Fig. 3 and Discussion ("A notable divergence")] The partial spin-charge decoupling conclusion rests on the absence of a resistive anomaly at x > 0.15 and the persistence of a "subtle kink" in χ(T). Because the resistive anomaly broadens with Cu content (Fig. 1), its apparent disappearance could be a detection-threshold or background-subtraction effect rather than a genuine decoupling. In addition, the χ anomaly is weak, and no statistical significance, peak-fitting criterion, or alternative background model is presented for the derivative features. Without a direct probe of charge order (e.g., diffraction or local structural measurements), the assignment of the resistive anomaly to the charge component and the susceptibility anomaly to the spin component remains an assumption. The authors should either temper the abstract-level claim of spin-charge decoupling or provide a more quantitative analysis of the anomaly detection limits.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Fig. 4 caption] The threshold for the disappearance of the resistive anomaly is stated as x > 0.15 in the abstract and Results, but the Fig. 4 caption says the resistive transition "vanishes near x ≈ 0.20." Please standardize this value.
  2. [Methods, first paragraph] The formula "La4Ni3-xCuxO10-δ" is inconsistent with the "+δ" notation used elsewhere in the paper; this should be corrected.
  3. [Results, Fig. 2d] TGA is described as shown only for x = 0 (Fig. S2), yet Fig. 2d plots δ as a function of x for the full series. Please clarify how the oxygen non-stoichiometry was determined for the Cu-substituted samples and include error bars.
  4. [Results, Fig. 2c] The linear fit to the Hall carrier concentration for 0 ≤ x ≤ 0.36 is mentioned but the fit parameters and error bars are not given; please include them in the figure or caption.
  5. [References and Supplemental Material] Reference 33 lists a composition La4Ni2.25Cu0.75O10+δ while the text primarily discusses x = 0.7; please align the notation consistently.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper reports direct measurements and empirical trends; no prediction is defined in terms of its own inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central results are experimental observations: T_dw is read off from minima in dρ/dT and dχ/dT for each composition, the linear suppression slope (-13.8 K per 1% Cu) is a least-squares fit to those independently extracted transition temperatures, and the carrier concentration is obtained from Hall measurements at a single temperature. None of these quantities is defined through another claimed output. The comparison between the measured Hall carrier increase (~10^22 cm^-3) and the estimated oxygen-stoichiometry contribution (~10^20 cm^-3) is an interpretive argument, not a circular derivation: the oxygen content comes from TGA and the Hall number comes from transport, and neither is fitted to the other. The conclusion that density-wave suppression delocalizes carriers is an analogy-supported interpretation of the measured trends, and the paper itself acknowledges uncertainty about whether doping or disorder drives the suppression. References to prior work are used to motivate or contextualize the measurements, not to supply the derivation of the paper's quantitative claims. The absence of a model, fitting parameter, or self-citation chain that is reused as evidence means there is no step where an output reduces to an input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard experimental interpretations: that the resistivity and susceptibility anomalies mark a common density wave transition, that TGA-determined oxygen content is accurate for the series, and that a single-temperature Hall measurement represents mobile carrier density. No new physical entities or axioms beyond these domain assumptions are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Linear suppression slope of Tdw vs Cu content = -13.8 K per 1% Cu
    Obtained from a linear regression to the Tdw versus x data across the series; it quantifies the observed suppression but is not an independently predicted constant.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The minima in dρ/dT and dχ/dT mark a common SDW/CDW transition in all Cu-substituted samples.
    Used to extract Tdw in Figs. 1-4; if the anomalies have different origins, the phase diagram and decoupling conclusion change.
  • domain assumption The oxygen content δ determined by TGA for the series is accurate and all samples are phase-pure for x<0.7.
    Oxygen stoichiometry is used to argue that Cu substitution's effect on carrier concentration exceeds oxygen doping; phase purity is needed to ensure anomalies are intrinsic.
  • domain assumption Hall carrier density measured at 1.8 K over -3 to +3 T represents the mobile carrier concentration in the low-temperature normal state for all x.
    This is the basis for the carrier delocalization claim; a single-temperature measurement may miss multiband or temperature-dependent effects.
  • domain assumption The analogy to cuprates (e.g., stripe order and pseudogap carrier release) transfers to trilayer nickelates.
    Used in the Discussion to interpret the carrier density jump as delocalization from density wave suppression.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Suppression of Intertwined Density Waves in La$_4$Ni$_{3-x}$Cu$_x$O$_{10+\delta}$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4A3FHMIR

@misc{pith2026250708756,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Suppression of Intertwined Density Waves in La$_4$Ni$_3-x$Cu$_x$O$_10+\delta$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4A3FHMIR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.08756}
}
abstract

Superconductivity in La$_{4}$Ni$_{3}$O$_{10}$ has been reported to emerge upon suppression of intertwined spin and charge density wave (SDW/CDW) order, suggesting a possible connection to the pairing mechanism. Here we report a systematic investigation of La$_{4}$Ni$_{3-x}$Cu$_{x}$O$_{10+\delta}$ ($0 \leq x \leq 0.7$), focusing on the evolution of the SDW/CDW order as a function of chemical substitution. Temperature-dependent resistivity, magnetic susceptibility, and Hall effect measurements reveal a linear suppression of density wave transition temperature $T{\text{dw}}$ and a concurrent enhancement of hole concentration with increasing Cu content. At higher substitution levels ($x > 0.15$), the transition-induced anomaly in the resistivity becomes undetectable while a magnetic signature persists, indicating a partial decoupling of spin and charge components and the possible survival of short-range spin correlations. The absence of superconductivity across the substitution series highlights the importance of additional factors in stabilizing the superconducting state in pressurized La$_{4}$Ni$_{3}$O$_{10}$.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Sun et al., Signatures of superconductivity near 80 K in a nickelate under high pressure, Nature 621, 493 (2023)

    H. Sun et al., Signatures of superconductivity near 80 K in a nickelate under high pressure, Nature 621, 493 (2023)

  2. [2]

    Zhang et al., Superconductivity in Trilayer Nickelate La 4 Ni 3 O 10 under Pressure, Phys

    M. Zhang et al., Superconductivity in Trilayer Nickelate La 4 Ni 3 O 10 under Pressure, Phys. Rev. X 15, 021005 (2025)

  3. [3]

    Wang et al., Pressure-Induced Superconductivity In Polycrystalline La 3 Ni 2 O 7 − δ, Phys

    G. Wang et al., Pressure-Induced Superconductivity In Polycrystalline La 3 Ni 2 O 7 − δ, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011040 (2024)

  4. [4]

    Zhang et al., High-temperature superconductivity with zero resistance and strange-metal behaviour in La3Ni2O7−δ, Nat

    Y. Zhang et al., High-temperature superconductivity with zero resistance and strange-metal behaviour in La3Ni2O7−δ, Nat. Phys. 20, 1269 (2024)

  5. [5]

    Hou et al., Emergence of High -Temperature Superconducting Phase in Pressurized La3Ni2O7 Crystals, Chin

    J. Hou et al., Emergence of High -Temperature Superconducting Phase in Pressurized La3Ni2O7 Crystals, Chin. Phys. Lett 40, (2023)

  6. [6]

    H. Sakakibara et al., Theoretical analysis on the possibility of superconductivity in the trilayer Ruddlesden-Popper nickelate La 4 Ni 3 O 10 under pressure and its experimental examination: Comparison with La 3 Ni 2 O 7, Phys. Rev. B 109, 144511 (2024)

  7. [7]

    Zhang, C

    M. Zhang, C. Pei, Q. Wang, Y. Zhao, C. Li, W. Cao, S. Zhu, J. Wu, and Y. Qi, Effects of pressure and doping on Ruddlesden-Popper phases Lan+1NinO3n+1, Journal of Materials Science & Technology 185, 147 (2024)

  8. [8]

    Investigations of key issues on the reproducibility of high-Tc superconductivity emerging from compressed La3Ni2O7

    Y. Zhou et al., Investigations of Key Issues on the Reproducibility of High -Tc Superconductivity Emerging from Compressed La3Ni2O7, arXiv:2311.12361

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    Q. Li, Y. -J. Zhang, Z. -N. Xiang, Y. Zhang, X. Zhu, and H. -H. Wen, Signature of Superconductivity in Pressurized La4Ni3O10, Chin. Phys. Lett 41, (2023)

  2. [10]

    Zhu et al., Superconductivity in pressurized trilayer La4Ni3O10−δ single crystals, Nature 631, 531 (2024)

    Y. Zhu et al., Superconductivity in pressurized trilayer La4Ni3O10−δ single crystals, Nature 631, 531 (2024)

  3. [11]

    Li et al., Structural transition, electric transport, and electronic structures in the compressed trilayer nickelate La4Ni3O10, Sci

    J. Li et al., Structural transition, electric transport, and electronic structures in the compressed trilayer nickelate La4Ni3O10, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 67, 117403 (2024)

  4. [12]

    Nagata, H

    H. Nagata, H. Sakurai, Y. Ueki, K. Yamane, R. Matsumoto, K. Terashima, K. Hirose, H. Ohta, M. Kato, and Y. Takano, Pressure-Induced Superconductivity in La4 Ni3 O10+ δ ( δ = 0.04 and −0.01), J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 93, 095003 (2024)

  5. [13]

    E. K. Ko et al., Signatures of ambient pressure superconductivity in thin film La3Ni2O7, Nature 638, 935 (2025)

  6. [14]

    Zhou et al., Ambient -pressure superconductivity onset above 40 K in (La,Pr)3Ni2O7 films, Nature 640, 641 (2025)

    G. Zhou et al., Ambient -pressure superconductivity onset above 40 K in (La,Pr)3Ni2O7 films, Nature 640, 641 (2025)

  7. [15]

    Liu et al

    Y. Liu et al. , Superconductivity and normal -state transport in compressively strained La₂PrNi₂O₇ thin films, arXiv:2501.08022 (2025)

  8. [16]

    Zhang et al., Intertwined density waves in a metallic nickelate, Nat Commun 11, 6003 (2020)

    J. Zhang et al., Intertwined density waves in a metallic nickelate, Nat Commun 11, 6003 (2020)

  9. [17]

    Li et al., Direct Visualization of an Incommensurate Unidirectional Charge Density Wave in La4Ni3O10, arXiv:2501.18885

    M. Li et al., Direct Visualization of an Incommensurate Unidirectional Charge Density Wave in La4Ni3O10, arXiv:2501.18885

  10. [18]

    Hücker, M

    M. Hücker, M. V. Zimmermann, G. D. Gu, Z. J. Xu, J. S. Wen, G. Xu, H. J. Kang, A. Zheludev, and J. M. Tranquada, Stripe order in superconducting La 2 − x Ba x CuO 4 ( 0 . 095 ⩽ x ⩽ 0 . 155 ), Phys. Rev. B 83, 104506 (2011)

  11. [19]

    J. M. Tranquada, B. J. Sternlieb, J. D. Axe, Y. Nakamura, and S. Uchida, Evidence for stripe correlations of spins and holes in copper oxide superconductors, Nature 375, 561 (1995)

  12. [20]

    J. M. Tranquada, J. D. Axe, N. Ichikawa, A. R. Moodenbaugh, Y. Nakamura, and S. Uchida, Coexistence of, and Competition between, Superconductivity and Charge -Stripe Order in La 1 . 6 − x Nd 0.4 Sr x CuO 4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 338 (1997)

  13. [21]

    J. M. Tranquada et al., Evidence for unusual superconducting correlations coexisting with stripe order in La 1.875 Ba 0.125 CuO 4, Phys. Rev. B 78, 174529 (2008)

  14. [22]

    O. O. Bernal, D. E. MacLaughlin, G. D. Morris, P. -C. Ho, L. Shu, C. Tan, J. Zhang, Z. Ding, K. Huang, and V. V. Poltavets, Charge -stripe order, antiferromagnetism, and spin dynamics in the cuprate-analog nickelate La 4 Ni 3 O 8, Phys. Rev. B 100, 125142 (2019)

  15. [23]

    Klingeler, B

    R. Klingeler, B. Büchner, S. -W. Cheong, and M. Hücker, Weak ferromagnetic spin and charge stripe order in La 5 ∕ 3 Sr 1 ∕ 3 Ni O 4, Phys. Rev. B 72, 104424 (2005)

  16. [24]

    Osada, C

    M. Osada, C. Terakura, A. Kikkawa, M. Nakajima, H. -Y. Chen, Y. Nomura, Y. Tokura, and A. Tsukazaki, Strain -tuning for superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 thin films, Commun Phys 8, 1 (2025)

  17. [25]

    Zeng et al., Superconductivity in infinite-layer nickelate La1−x Cax NiO2 thin films, Sci

    S. Zeng et al., Superconductivity in infinite-layer nickelate La1−x Cax NiO2 thin films, Sci. Adv. 8, eabl9927 (2022)

  18. [26]

    Ding et al., Cuprate-like Electronic Structures in Infinite -Layer Nickelates with Substantial Hole Dopings, arXiv:2403.07448

    X. Ding et al., Cuprate-like Electronic Structures in Infinite -Layer Nickelates with Substantial Hole Dopings, arXiv:2403.07448

  19. [27]

    Osada, B

    M. Osada, B. Y. Wang, B. H. Goodge, S. P. Harvey, K. Lee, D. Li, L. F. Kourkoutis, and H. Y. Hwang, Nickelate Superconductivity without Rare‐Earth Magnetism: (La,Sr)NiO 2, Advanced Materials 33, 2104083 (2021)

  20. [28]

    W. Sun, Z. Wang, B. Hao, S. Yan, H. Sun, Z. Gu, Y. Deng, and Y. Nie, In Situ Preparation of Superconducting Infinite‐Layer Nickelate Thin Films with Atomically Flat Surface, Advanced Materials 36, 2401342 (2024)

  21. [29]

    D. Li, K. Lee, B. Y. Wang, M. Osada, S. Crossley, H. R. Lee, Y. Cui, Y. Hikita, and H. Y. Hwang, Superconductivity in an infinite-layer nickelate, Nature 572, 624 (2019)

  22. [30]

    Osada, B

    M. Osada, B. Y. Wang, K. Lee, D. Li, and H. Y. Hwang, Phase diagram of infinite layer praseodymium nickelate Pr 1 − x Sr x NiO 2 thin films, Phys. Rev. Materials 4, 121801 (2020)

  23. [31]

    F. Li, S. Wang, C. Ma, X. Wang, C. Liu, C. Fan, L. Han, S. Wang, X. Tao, and J. Zhang, Flux Growth of Trilayer La4 Ni3 O10 Single Crystals at Ambient Pressure, Crystal Growth & Design 24, 347 (2024)

  24. [32]

    Periyasamy, L

    M. Periyasamy, L. Patra, Ø. S. Fjellvåg, P. Ravindran, M. H. Sørby, S. Kumar, A. O. Sjåstad, and H. Fjellvåg, Electron Doping of the Layered Nickelate La4Ni3O10 by Aluminum Substitution: A Combined Experimental and DFT Study, arXiv:2006.12854

  25. [33]

    Supplemental Material at … for Hall effect measurements, Thermogravimetric analysis of La4Ni3O10+δ, La4Ni3-xCuxO10+δ x-ray diffraction data, Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive x-ray spectra for La4Ni2.25Cu0.75O10+δ

  26. [34]

    Khasanov et al., Identical Suppression of Spin and Charge Density Wave Transitions in La4Ni3O10 by Pressure, arXiv:2503.04400

    R. Khasanov et al., Identical Suppression of Spin and Charge Density Wave Transitions in La4Ni3O10 by Pressure, arXiv:2503.04400

  27. [35]

    W. J. Padilla, Y. S. Lee, M. Dumm, G. Blumberg, S. Ono, K. Segawa, S. Komiya, Y. Ando, and D. N. Basov, Constant effective mass across the phase diagram of high - T c cuprates, Phys. Rev. B 72, 060511 (2005)

  28. [36]

    Badoux et al., Change of carrier density at the pseudogap critical point of a cuprate superconductor, Nature 531, 210 (2016)

    S. Badoux et al., Change of carrier density at the pseudogap critical point of a cuprate superconductor, Nature 531, 210 (2016)

  29. [37]

    Morosan, H

    E. Morosan, H. W. Zandbergen, B. S. Dennis, J. W. G. Bos, Y. Onose, T. Klimczuk, A. P. Ramirez, N. P. Ong, and R. J. Cava, Superconductivity in CuxTiSe2, Nature Phys 2, 544 (2006)

  30. [38]

    J. M. Tranquada, J. D. Axe, N. Ichikawa, Y. Nakamura, S. Uchida, and B. Nachumi, Neutron-scattering study of stripe-phase order of holes and spins in La 1.48 Nd 0.4 Sr 0.12 CuO 4, Phys. Rev. B 54, 7489 (1996). Figure 1 . Temperature dependent resistivity of La 4Ni3-xCuxO10+δ f...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.