Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Intel RealSense Stereoscopic Depth Cameras

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1705.05548 v2 pith:4BXZ7DTW submitted 2017-05-16 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords intelrealsensesystemsstereoscopicaffectalgorithmsapplicationsbehavior
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a comprehensive overview of the stereoscopic Intel RealSense RGBD imaging systems. We discuss these systems' mode-of-operation, functional behavior and include models of their expected performance, shortcomings, and limitations. We provide information about the systems' optical characteristics, their correlation algorithms, and how these properties can affect different applications, including 3D reconstruction and gesture recognition. Our discussion covers the Intel RealSense R200 and the Intel RealSense D400 (formally RS400).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Interaction Analysis by Humans and AI: A Comparative Perspective

    cs.HC 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper evaluates LLM-based annotation of Finnish children's interactions, but its headline claim that mixed reality fosters richer interaction is contradicted by its own conclusion and data.

Pith tools