REVIEW 2 cited by
Intel RealSense Stereoscopic Depth Cameras
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We present a comprehensive overview of the stereoscopic Intel RealSense RGBD imaging systems. We discuss these systems' mode-of-operation, functional behavior and include models of their expected performance, shortcomings, and limitations. We provide information about the systems' optical characteristics, their correlation algorithms, and how these properties can affect different applications, including 3D reconstruction and gesture recognition. Our discussion covers the Intel RealSense R200 and the Intel RealSense D400 (formally RS400).
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Interaction Analysis by Humans and AI: A Comparative Perspective
The paper evaluates LLM-based annotation of Finnish children's interactions, but its headline claim that mixed reality fosters richer interaction is contradicted by its own conclusion and data.
-
Adaptation of Task Goal States from Prior Knowledge
The paper defines task goal states as variations (subsets of value domains) and shows how to build them from a single demonstration and plan to satisfy them.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.