Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 minor 1 cited by

Quantum theory of a three-photon Kerr parametric oscillator

T0 review · 2 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-05-21 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A three-photon-driven Kerr oscillator produces a threefold degenerate ground state of squeezed superpositions that can encode a phase-flip-protected qutrit.

desk verdict The paper derives exact and approximate ground states for a three-photon pumped Kerr oscillator with tunable squeezing in a threefold manifold, but the phase-flip qutrit protection rests on an ideal model that ignores loss and higher nonlinearities. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.21036 v1 pith:4DUZMXJV submitted 2026-05-20 quant-ph

Alessandro Bruno , Patrick P. Potts , Alexander Grimm , Matteo Brunelli This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords Kerrparametricoscillatorthree-photondrivesqueezedcatstatesqutritencodingphase-flipprotectionspectraldegeneracysqueezing
checked against Cost.FunctionalEquationFoundation.DimensionForcing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper derives exact analytical solutions at points of spectral degeneracy and approximate solutions in quasi-degenerate regimes for the ground state of a nonlinear Kerr oscillator under three-photon driving. In both cases the resulting manifold consists of superpositions of three macroscopically distinct states that contain squeezing whose strength and sign depend parametrically on the detuning. This squeezing can be enhanced, suppressed, or reversed by changing the detuning, producing a squeezing-to-anti-squeezing transition that is absent from ordinary three-component cat states. The controlled states are shown to be robust enough to serve as a logical qutrit encoding protected from phase-flip errors, with explicit expressions for leakage out of the manifold. A reader would care because the construction supplies an analytically tractable route to stabilized multi-level quantum information in a single nonlinear mode.

What carries the argument

The three-photon pump term added to the single-mode Kerr Hamiltonian, which enforces the exact or quasi-degenerate threefold ground-state manifold and the associated parametric squeezing.

What would settle it

Spectroscopic measurement of the oscillator energy levels at the predicted degeneracy points that shows either lifted degeneracy or squeezing amplitudes that fail to follow the calculated detuning dependence.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the three-photon Kerr parametric oscillator the exact solution at spectral degeneracy and the approximate solution at quasi-degeneracy both yield a threefold ground-state manifold whose members are quantum superpositions of three macroscopically distinct states. These states differ from conventional three-component Schrödinger cat states because they incorporate squeezing whose amplitude and sign are set by the detuning parameter. Changing the detuning therefore enhances, suppresses, or reverses the squeezing, driving a squeezing-to-anti-squeezing transition. The resulting states can be generated and stabilized, remain robust against small perturbations, and admit an analytic bound on the

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes an ideal single-mode Kerr oscillator containing only a pure three-photon pump term and no loss channels or higher-order nonlinearities that would lift the degeneracy or alter the ground-state manifold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Squeezing strength and sign become tunable knobs for the logical states by simple adjustment of detuning.
  • The manifold supplies a Kerr-cat qutrit encoding that is protected against phase-flip errors.
  • Leakage out of the ground-state manifold can be bounded analytically as a function of drive strength and detuning.
  • The superpositions remain stable against small perturbations that preserve the three-photon resonance condition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same three-photon resonance condition could be engineered in other platforms that realize strong Kerr nonlinearity, such as superconducting circuits or trapped ions.
  • The squeezing-to-anti-squeezing transition offers a diagnostic for the validity of the rotating-wave approximation used to derive the effective Hamiltonian.
  • Encoding higher-dimensional logical spaces with similar multi-photon drives may follow by replacing the three-photon term with an n-photon drive.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops the quantum theory of a three-photon Kerr parametric oscillator, deriving both exact analytical solutions at points of spectral degeneracy and approximate solutions in quasi-degenerate regimes. The threefold (quasi)degenerate ground-state manifold is shown to consist of squeezed superpositions of three macroscopically distinct states that differ from conventional three-component cat states; varying the detuning induces a squeezing-to-anti-squeezing transition, and the construction is proposed for encoding a Kerr-cat qutrit with protection against phase-flip errors, including analytical quantification of leakage to excited states.

Significance. If the analytical derivations hold and the claimed phase-flip protection is robust, the work would offer a useful analytical framework for realizing protected qutrits in driven nonlinear oscillators, extending Kerr-cat qubit ideas with explicit control over squeezing via detuning. The provision of both exact and approximate closed-form expressions for the manifold is a clear strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Derivation of exact spectral degeneracy] The central claim of exact threefold degeneracy (and resulting phase-flip protection) is derived for the ideal Hamiltonian H = Δ a†a + χ (a†a)^2 + (g/3)(a^3 + a†^3) without loss or higher-order terms. Any single-photon loss or χ_5 term would lift the degeneracy by an amount proportional to the perturbation strength, reducing the gap that protects the encoded qutrit; the manuscript should include a perturbative estimate of this splitting and its effect on leakage.
  2. [Approximate solutions and transition analysis] The quasi-degenerate approximation and the squeezing-to-anti-squeezing transition are load-bearing for the qutrit encoding proposal, yet the validity range of the perturbation (e.g., relative to the pump amplitude g and detuning) is not explicitly bounded against the neglected counter-rotating or loss terms.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Ground-state manifold description] Clarify the definition and parametric dependence of the squeezing parameter in the exact versus approximate manifolds to avoid ambiguity when comparing to standard cat states.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the presentation of our results on the three-photon Kerr parametric oscillator and the proposed Kerr-cat qutrit encoding.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim of exact threefold degeneracy (and resulting phase-flip protection) is derived for the ideal Hamiltonian H = Δ a†a + χ (a†a)^2 + (g/3)(a^3 + a†^3) without loss or higher-order terms. Any single-photon loss or χ_5 term would lift the degeneracy by an amount proportional to the perturbation strength, reducing the gap that protects the encoded qutrit; the manuscript should include a perturbative estimate of this splitting and its effect on leakage.

    Authors: We agree that perturbations such as single-photon loss and higher-order terms like χ_5 can lift the exact degeneracy and affect the protection. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection providing a first-order perturbative estimate of the splitting induced by a small loss rate κ and a χ_5 term. The splitting scales linearly with the perturbation strength, and the leakage out of the ground-state manifold is shown to be of order (perturbation strength / gap)^2. This analysis confirms that the phase-flip protection remains effective provided the perturbations remain small compared with the gap set by g, consistent with the regime already discussed in the original text. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The quasi-degenerate approximation and the squeezing-to-anti-squeezing transition are load-bearing for the qutrit encoding proposal, yet the validity range of the perturbation (e.g., relative to the pump amplitude g and detuning) is not explicitly bounded against the neglected counter-rotating or loss terms.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the need for explicit bounds. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph that states the conditions of validity: the quasi-degenerate approximation holds for |Δ| ≪ g with an error bounded by |Δ|/g, while the rotating-wave approximation underlying the Hamiltonian requires g/ω ≪ 1 to suppress counter-rotating terms. We also note that small loss rates κ ≪ g do not qualitatively alter the squeezing-to-anti-squeezing transition. These bounds are now stated explicitly with reference to the parameter regimes used in the figures. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Derivation from ideal Hamiltonian is self-contained with no circular reductions

full rationale

The paper starts from the explicit Hamiltonian of the three-photon driven Kerr oscillator and derives exact eigenstates at points of spectral degeneracy as well as approximate solutions in quasi-degenerate regimes. These steps consist of direct analytical diagonalization or perturbation methods applied to the given model, producing the threefold manifold and its squeezing properties as mathematical consequences rather than tautological redefinitions or fitted renamings. No load-bearing self-citations, parameter fits renamed as predictions, or ansatzes smuggled via prior work are present; the ideal-model assumptions (absence of loss and higher-order terms) are stated upfront and the results are falsifiable within that framework. The squeezing-to-anti-squeezing transition follows parametrically from varying detuning in the same equations.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on the standard framework of open quantum systems or circuit QED for parametric oscillators. No new entities invented; free parameters are the physical detuning and drive strengths typical in such models.

free parameters (2)
  • detuning parameter
    The detuning between oscillator and pump is varied to control squeezing, likely a tunable parameter in the model.
  • pump amplitude
    Strength of the three-photon pump is a key parameter in the Hamiltonian.
assumptions (2)
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanical treatment of bosonic modes with Kerr nonlinearity and parametric drive.
    The model is built on the usual Hamiltonian for nonlinear oscillators in quantum optics.
  • domain assumption Existence of exact spectral degeneracy at specific parameter values.
    The exact solution arises at an exact spectral degeneracy as stated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum theory of a three-photon Kerr parametric oscillator." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4DUZMXJV

@misc{pith2026260521036,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum theory of a three-photon Kerr parametric oscillator},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4DUZMXJV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.21036}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the quantum properties of a nonlinear Kerr oscillator driven by a three-photon pump. We derive both exact and approximate analytical expressions for the ground state of this interacting model. The exact solution arises at an exact spectral degeneracy, while the approximate solution describes regimes of quasi-degeneracy of the energy spectrum. In both cases, the threefold (quasi)degenerate ground-state manifold consists of quantum superpositions of three macroscopically distinct states. These states differ qualitatively from conventional three-component Schr\"odinger's cat states due to the presence of squeezing with a distinctive parametric dependence. By varying the detuning between the oscillator and the three-photon pump, we show that the squeezing can be enhanced, suppressed, or even reversed, leading to a squeezing-to-anti-squeezing transition. We analyze the generation and stabilization of these superposition states, their robustness against perturbations and analytically quantify the leakage to excited states. Our analysis elucidates how the three-photon Kerr parametric oscillator can be used to encode a Kerr-cat qutrit protected against phase-flip errors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21036 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Phase diagram of the three-photon Kerr parametric oscillator (3KPO), obtained from the meta-potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (c) and (d) display the energy spectrum as a function of detuning, showing that a large negative detuning also leads to triple degeneracy of the spectrum. We notice that, for neg￾ative detuning, the spectrum in the limit of vanishing pump is no longer decreasingly ordered with respect to n (some of the E (G=0) n≥1 become positive). This can lead to extra degeneracies for the choice of specific integer values of the … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a)-(c) Wigner function of the ground states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Magnitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Squeezing parameter Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The vacuum manifold of the 3KPO hosts a qutrit. At the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Fidelity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Steady-state Wigner function of the 3KPO subject to photon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. State initialization and evolution under single-photon loss. (a) Populations of the three-legged squeezed cat states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. (a)-(b) Exact wavefunctions Eqs. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum and Classical Potts Criticality in Driven-Dissipative Bosonic Lattices

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Nonequilibrium steady states of cubically driven dissipative Bose-Hubbard lattices realize classical 2D and quantum 1D three-state Potts criticality according to the presence of three-photon losses.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 84 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    2NhnwtqRY92B2ID2IXunQpoAHtg=

    The projection of that state on thexyplane would be the mixed state(|C 0⟩⟨C0|+|C 1⟩⟨C1|)/2. D. Comparison with numerics We now benchmark the expressions of the three-legged squeezed cat states Eqs. (23)-(25) obtained within our ap- proximate treatment against the actual ground state of the 3KPO Hamiltonian Eq. (1). Results for three representative cases w...

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    NO6fhRBrpGo0zFMBucy64S9veE0=

    This is a second- order differential equation (with non-constant coefficients) and therefore admits two independent solutions, each corre- sponding to a pure state. Which linear combination of the two is selected depends upon the choice of the boundary terms. The two independent solutions,φ A(x)andφ B(x), have the following elegant expressions φA(x) =N A ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Bartolo, F

    N. Bartolo, F. Minganti, W. Casteels, and C. Ciuti, Phys. Rev. A94, 033841 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Minganti, N

    F. Minganti, N. Bartolo, J. Lolli, W. Casteels, and C. Ciuti, Sci- entific Reports6, 26987 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Roberts and A

    D. Roberts and A. A. Clerk, Phys. Rev. X10, 021022 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Grigoriou and C

    E. Grigoriou and C. Navarrete-Benlloch, (2023), arXiv:2303.12894

    work page arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Casteels, F

    W. Casteels, F. Storme, A. Le Boit´e, and C. Ciuti, Phys. Rev. A 93, 033824 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Minganti, A

    F. Minganti, A. Biella, N. Bartolo, and C. Ciuti, Phys. Rev. A 98, 042118 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 84 references
  1. [9]

    X. H. H. Zhang and H. U. Baranger, Phys. Rev. A103, 033711 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    Minganti, V

    F. Minganti, V . Savona, and A. Biella, Quantum7, 1170 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    Soriente, T

    M. Soriente, T. L. Heugel, K. Omiya, R. Chitra, and O. Zilber- berg, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023100 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Ameye, A

    O. Ameye, A. Eichler, and O. Zilberberg, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033204 (2025)

    2025

  5. [13]

    Wielinga and G

    B. Wielinga and G. J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. A48, 2494 (1993)

    1993

  6. [14]

    Wustmann and V

    W. Wustmann and V . Shumeiko, Low Temperature Physics45, 848 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    Dykman,Fluctuating Nonlinear Oscillators: From Nanomechanics to Quantum Superconducting Circuits(Oxford University Press, 2012)

    M. Dykman,Fluctuating Nonlinear Oscillators: From Nanomechanics to Quantum Superconducting Circuits(Oxford University Press, 2012)

    2012

  8. [16]

    Eichler and O

    A. Eichler and O. Zilberberg,Classical and Quantum Paramet- ric Phenomena(Oxford University Press, 2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    S. Puri, S. Boutin, and A. Blais, npj Quantum Information3, 18 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    Goto, Sci

    H. Goto, Sci. Rep.6, 21686 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    P. T. Cochrane, G. J. Milburn, and W. J. Munro, Physical Re- view A59, 2631 (1999)

    1999

  12. [20]

    Mirrahimi, Z

    M. Mirrahimi, Z. Leghtas, V . V . Albert, S. Touzard, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. Jiang, and M. H. Devoret, New Journal of Physics16, 045014 (2014)

    2014

  13. [22]

    Touzard, A

    S. Touzard, A. Grimm, Z. Leghtas, S. Mundhada, P. Rein- hold, C. Axline, M. Reagor, K. Chou, J. Blumoff, K. Sliwa, S. Shankar, L. Frunzio, R. Schoelkopf, M. Mirrahimi, and M. Devoret, Physical Review X8, 021005 (2018)

    2018

  14. [23]

    Lescanne, M

    R. Lescanne, M. Villiers, T. Peronnin, A. Sarlette, M. Delbecq, B. Huard, T. Kontos, M. Mirrahimi, and Z. Leghtas, Nat. Phys. 16, 509 (2020)

    2020

  15. [24]

    Grimm, N

    A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, S. , S. O. Mundhada, S. Touzard, M. Mirrahimi, S. M. Girvin, S. Shankar, and M. H. Devoret, Nature584, 205 (2020)

    2020

  16. [25]

    N. E. Frattini, R. G. Corti ˜nas, J. Venkatraman, X. Xiao, Q. Su, C. U. Lei, B. J. Chapman, V . R. Joshi, S. M. Girvin, R. J. 19 Schoelkopf, S. , and M. H. Devoret, Phys. Rev. X14, 031040 (2024)

    2024

  17. [26]

    A. Hajr, B. Qing, K. Wang, G. Koolstra, Z. Pedramrazi, Z. Kang, L. Chen, L. B. Nguyen, C. J¨unger, N. Goss, I. Huang, B. Bhandari, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, J. Dressel, A. N. Jordan, D. I. Santiago, and I. Siddiqi, Physical Review X14, 041049 (2024)

    2024

  18. [27]

    B. Qing, A. Hajr, K. Wang, G. Koolstra, L. B. Nguyen, J. Hines, I. Huang, B. Bhandari, Z. Padramrazi, L. Chen, Z. Kang, C. J ¨unger, N. Goss, N. Jain, H. Kim, K.-H. Lee, A. Hashim, N. E. Frattini, J. Dressel, A. N. Jordan, D. I. Santiago, and I. Siddiqi, Benchmarking Single-Qu...

    2024

  19. [28]

    A. Z. Ding, B. L. Brock, A. Eickbusch, A. Koottandavida, N. E. Frattini, R. G. Corti ˜nas, V . R. Joshi, S. J. de Graaf, B. J. Chap- man, S. Ganjam, L. Frunzio, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. De- voret, Nature Communications16, 5279 (2025)

    2025

  20. [29]

    Adinolfi, D

    F. Adinolfi, D. Z. Haxell, A. Bruno, L. Michaud, V . H. Kam- rul, P. Pandey, and A. Grimm, Enhancing Kerr-Cat Qubit Co- herence with Controlled Dissipation (2025), arXiv:2511.01027 [quant-ph] version: 1

    2025

  21. [30]

    S. Puri, L. St-Jean, J. A. Gross, A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, P. S. Iyer, A. Krishna, S. Touzard, L. Jiang, A. Blais, S. T. Flammia, and S. M. Girvin, Science Advances6, eaay5901 (2020)

    2020

  22. [31]

    A. S. Darmawan, B. J. Brown, A. L. Grimsmo, D. K. Tuckett, and S. Puri, PRX Quantum2, 030345 (2021)

    2021

  23. [32]

    Chono, T

    H. Chono, T. Kanao, and H. Goto, Physical Review Research4, 043054 (2022), arXiv:2204.03347 [cond-mat, physics:physics, physics:quant-ph]

    2022

  24. [33]

    Gravina, F

    L. Gravina, F. Minganti, and V . Savona, PRX Quantum4, 020337 (2023)

    2023

  25. [34]

    Rousseau, D

    R. Rousseau, D. Ruiz, E. Albertinale, P. d’Avezac, D. Banys, U. Blandin, N. Bourdaud, G. Campanaro, G. Cardoso, N. Cot- tet, C. Cullip, S. Del ´eglise, L. Devanz, A. Devulder, A. Es- sig, P. F ´evrier, A. Gicquel, ´Elie Gouzien, A. Gras, J. Guil- laud, E. G¨um¨us ¸, M. Hall´en...

    2025 doi

  26. [35]

    Putterman, J

    H. Putterman, J. Iverson, Q. Xu, L. Jiang, O. Painter, F. G. Brand˜ao, and K. Noh, Physical Review Letters128, 110502 (2022)

    2022

  27. [36]

    D. Ruiz, R. Gautier, J. Guillaud, and M. Mirrahimi, Phys. Rev. A107, 042407 (2023)

    2023

  28. [37]

    Masuda, S

    S. Masuda, S. Kamimura, T. Yamamoto, T. Aoki, and A. Tomonaga, npj Quantum Information11, 26 (2025)

    2025

  29. [38]

    Q. Su, R. G. Corti ˜nas, J. Venkatraman, and S. Puri, Phys. Rev. A112, 042202 (2025)

    2025

  30. [39]

    Benhayoune-Khadraoui, C

    O. Benhayoune-Khadraoui, C. Lled ´o, and A. Blais, (2025), arXiv:2507.06160

    2025

  31. [40]

    Marquet, A

    A. Marquet, A. Essig, J. Cohen, N. Cottet, A. Murani, E. Al- bertinale, S. Dupouy, A. Bienfait, T. Peronnin, S. Jezouin, R. Lescanne, and B. Huard, Physical Review X14, 021019 (2024)

    2024

  32. [41]

    Guillaud and M

    J. Guillaud and M. Mirrahimi, Physical Review X9, 041053 (2019)

    2019

  33. [42]

    Guillaud and M

    J. Guillaud and M. Mirrahimi, Physical Review A103, 042413 (2021)

    2021

  34. [43]

    Chamberland, K

    C. Chamberland, K. Noh, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, E. T. Camp- bell, C. T. Hann, J. Iverson, H. Putterman, T. C. Bohdanowicz, S. T. Flammia, A. Keller, G. Refael, J. Preskill, L. Jiang, A. H. Safavi-Naeini, O. Painter, and F. G. Brand˜ao, PRX Quantum3, 010329 (2022)

    2022

  35. [44]

    Gautier, A

    R. Gautier, A. Sarlette, and M. Mirrahimi, PRX Quantum3, 020339 (2022)

    2022

  36. [45]

    Q. Xu, J. K. Iverson, F. G. S. L. Brand˜ao, and L. Jiang, Physical Review Research4, 013082 (2022)

    2022

  37. [46]

    Venkatraman, R

    J. Venkatraman, R. G. Corti ˜nas, N. E. Frattini, X. Xiao, and M. H. Devoret, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences121, e2311241121 (2024), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2311241121

    2024 doi

  38. [47]

    Putterman, K

    H. Putterman, K. Noh, C. T. Hann, G. S. MacCabe, S. Aghaeimeibodi, R. N. Patel, M. Lee, W. M. Jones, H. Moradinejad, R. Rodriguez, N. Mahuli, J. Rose, J. C. Owens, H. Levine, E. Rosenfeld, P. Reinhold, L. Moncelsi, J. A. Alcid, N. Alidoust, P. Arrangoiz-Arriola, J. Barnett, P....

    2025

  39. [48]

    A. C. C. d. Albornoz, R. G. Corti˜nas, M. Sch¨afer, N. E. Frattini, B. Allen, D. G. A. Cabral, P. E. Videla, P. Khazaei, E. Geva, V . S. Batista, and M. H. Devoret, (2024), arXiv:2409.13113

    2024 arXiv

  40. [49]

    D. Ruiz, J. Guillaud, A. Leverrier, M. Mirrahimi, and C. Vuillot, Nature Communications16, 1040 (2025)

    2025

  41. [50]

    R ´eglade, A

    U. R ´eglade, A. Bocquet, R. Gautier, J. Cohen, A. Marquet, E. Albertinale, N. Pankratova, M. Hall ´en, F. Rautschke, L.-A. Sellem, P. Rouchon, A. Sarlette, M. Mirrahimi, P. Campagne- Ibarcq, R. Lescanne, S. Jezouin, and Z. Leghtas, Nature629, 778 (2024)

    2024

  42. [51]

    Kanao, S

    T. Kanao, S. Masuda, S. Kawabata, and H. Goto, Phys. Rev. Appl.18, 014019 (2022)

    2022

  43. [52]

    A. M. Eriksson, T. S´epulcre, M. Kervinen, T. Hillmann, M. Ku- dra, S. Dupouy, Y . Lu, M. Khanahmadi, J. Yang, C. Castillo- Moreno, P. Delsing, and S. Gasparinetti, Nature Communica- tions15, 2512 (2024)

    2024

  44. [53]

    Svensson, A

    I.-M. Svensson, A. Bengtsson, P. Krantz, J. Bylander, V . Shumeiko, and P. Delsing, Phys. Rev. B96, 174503 (2017)

    2017

  45. [54]

    C. W. S. Chang, C. Sab ´ın, P. Forn-D´ıaz, F. Quijandr´ıa, A. M. Vadiraj, I. Nsanzineza, G. Johansson, and C. M. Wilson, Phys. Rev. X10, 011011 (2020)

    2020

  46. [55]

    S. Kwon, D. Hoshi, T. Nagase, D. Sugiyama, H. Mukai, K. Takemura, R. Kojima, Y . Zhou, S. Watabe, F. Yoshihara, and J.-S. Tsai, Realisation of Protected Cat Qutrit via Engineered Quantum Tunnelling (2026), arXiv:2601.17675 [quant-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  47. [56]

    Zhang, J

    Y . Zhang, J. Gosner, S. M. Girvin, J. Ankerhold, and M. I. Dyk- man, Phys. Rev. A96, 052124 (2017)

    2017

  48. [57]

    Zhang and M

    Y . Zhang and M. I. Dykman, Phys. Rev. E100, 052148 (2019)

    2019

  49. [58]

    L ¨orch, Y

    N. L ¨orch, Y . Zhang, C. Bruder, and M. I. Dykman, Phys. Rev. 20 Res.1, 023023 (2019)

    2019

  50. [59]

    Gosner, B

    J. Gosner, B. Kubala, and J. Ankerhold, Phys. Rev. B101, 054501 (2020)

    2020

  51. [60]

    Arndt and F

    L. Arndt and F. Hassler, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 187701 (2022)

    2022

  52. [61]

    Arndt and F

    L. Arndt and F. Hassler, Phys. Rev. B106, 014513 (2022)

    2022

  53. [62]

    Lang and A

    B. Lang and A. D. Armour, New Journal of Physics23, 033021 (2021)

    2021

  54. [63]

    M. A. P. Reynoso, E. M. Signor, J. Khalouf-Rivera, A. D. Ribeiro, F. P ´erez-Bernal, and L. F. Santos, Phys. Rev. A112, 032415 (2025)

    2025

  55. [64]

    S. Kwon, S. Watabe, and J.-S. Tsai, npj Quantum Information 8, 40 (2022)

    2022

  56. [65]

    S. Puri, A. Grimm, P. Campagne-Ibarcq, A. Eickbusch, K. Noh, G. Roberts, L. Jiang, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, and S. M. Girvin, Phys. Rev. X9, 041009 (2019)

    2019

  57. [66]

    Zhang and M

    Y . Zhang and M. I. Dykman, Phys. Rev. A95, 053841 (2017)

    2017

  58. [67]

    Ch ´avez-Carlos, T

    J. Ch ´avez-Carlos, T. L. M. Lezama, R. G. Corti ˜nas, J. Venka- traman, M. H. Devoret, V . S. Batista, F. P´erez-Bernal, and L. F. Santos, npj Quantum Information9, 76 (2023)

    2023

  59. [68]

    Marthaler and M

    M. Marthaler and M. I. Dykman, Phys. Rev. A76, 010102 (2007)

    2007

  60. [69]

    X. Xiao, J. Venkatraman, R. G. Corti ˜nas, S. Chowdhury, and M. H. Devoret, Phys. Rev. Appl.24, 044021 (2025)

    2025

  61. [70]

    Eltschka, M

    C. Eltschka, M. Huber, S. Morelli, and J. Siewert, Quantum5, 485 (2021)

    2021

  62. [71]

    G. T. Landi, M. J. Kewming, M. T. Mitchison, and P. P. Potts, PRX Quantum5, 020201 (2024)

    2024

  63. [72]

    Kraus, H

    B. Kraus, H. P. B ¨uchler, S. Diehl, A. Kantian, A. Micheli, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. A78, 042307 (2008)

    2008

  64. [73]

    P. D. Drummond and D. F. Walls, Journal of Physics A: Math- ematical and General13, 725 (1980)

    1980

  65. [74]

    Y . Wang, Z. Hu, B. C. Sanders, and S. Kais, Front. Phys.8, 589504 (2020)

    2020

  66. [75]

    Champion, Z

    E. Champion, Z. Wang, R. W. Parker, and M. S. Blok, Phys. Rev. X15, 021096 (2025)

    2025

  67. [76]

    E. T. Campbell, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 230501 (2014)

    2014

  68. [77]

    Leghtas, S

    Z. Leghtas, S. Touzard, I. M. Pop, A. Kou, B. Vlastakis, A. Pe- trenko, K. M. Sliwa, A. Narla, S. Shankar, M. J. Hatridge, M. Reagor, L. Frunzio, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. Mirrahimi, and M. H. Devoret, Science347, 853 (2015)

    2015

  69. [78]

    Touzard, A

    S. Touzard, A. Grimm, Z. Leghtas, S. O. Mundhada, P. Rein- hold, C. Axline, M. Reagor, K. Chou, J. Blumoff, K. M. Sliwa, S. Shankar, L. Frunzio, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. Mirrahimi, and M. H. Devoret, Phys. Rev. X8, 021005 (2018)

    2018

  70. [79]

    A. C. C. de Albornoz, R. G. Corti˜nas, M. Sch¨afer, N. E. Frattini, B. Allen, D. G. Cabral, P. E. Videla, P. Khazaei, E. Geva, V . S. Batista, and M. H. Devoret, PRX Quantum7, 020309 (2026)

    2026

  71. [80]

    D. G. A. Cabral, P. Khazaei, B. C. Allen, P. E. Videla, M. Sch ¨afer, R. G. Corti ˜nas, A. C. Carrillo de Albornoz, J. Ch´avez-Carlos, L. F. Santos, E. Geva, and V . S. Batista, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters15, 12042 (2024)

    2024

  72. [81]

    R. S. Berry, J. Chem. Phys.32, 933 (1960)

    1960

  73. [82]

    Raynaud, L

    C. Raynaud, L. Maron, J.-P. Daudey, and F. Jolibois, ChemPhysChem7, 407 (2006)

    2006

  74. [83]

    Brunelli, O

    M. Brunelli, O. Houhou, D. W. Moore, A. Nunnenkamp, M. Pa- ternostro, and A. Ferraro, Phys. Rev. A98, 063801 (2018)

    2018

  75. [84]

    Brunelli and O

    M. Brunelli and O. Houhou, Phys. Rev. A100, 013831 (2019)

    2019

  76. [85]

    K. B. Mo/ller, T. G. Jo/rgensen, and J. P. Dahl, Phys. Rev. A54, 5378 (1996)

    1996

Pith tools

Reviewed May 21, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.