J-holomorphic curves and Dirac-harmonic maps

M. J. D. Hamilton

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 29 references

J-holomorphic curves and Dirac-harmonic maps

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A J-holomorphic curve in a Kähler manifold, paired with any spinor from four explicit kernel spaces, satisfies the Dirac-harmonic map equations.

desk verdict A clean, honest extension of Sun's uncoupled construction to the canonical Spin^c structure; the central claim checks out, but the novelty is incremental. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.02275 v2 pith:4EWC47V4 submitted 2019-08-06 math.DG math-phmath.MPmath.SG

M. J. D. Hamilton This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.DGmath-phmath.MPmath.SG MSC 53C2732Q6532Q15

keywords Dirac-harmonicmapJ-holomorphiccurveKählermanifoldSpin^cstructureRiemannsurfacemodulispacetopologicalstringtheoryCauchy–Riemannoperator

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that in a Kähler target, a J-holomorphic curve can always be enriched by spinors into a Dirac-harmonic map, provided the spinor lies in one of four kernel spaces built from the twisted Dolbeault operators. Because every J-holomorphic curve is harmonic, its tension field vanishes; the key additional fact is that the curvature term $R(f,\psi)$ also vanishes for these spinors, so the coupled Euler–Lagrange equations reduce to the Dirac equation, which holds by construction. The result turns the tangent bundle of the moduli space of regular J-holomorphic curves into a space of Dirac-harmonic maps, and it connects this construction to the A-model of topological string theory.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the decomposition of the Dirac operator along the map, $D_f = D'_f + D''_f$, on the canonical Spin$^c$ spinor bundle $S^c = \mathbb{C} \oplus K^{-1}$ of the Riemann surface twisted by $f^*T^{1,0}M$ and $f^*T^{0,1}M$. On a Riemann surface the Dirac operator is $\sqrt{2}(\bar\partial + \bar\partial^*)$; after twisting, $D'_f$ and $D''_f$ are the corresponding Dolbeault–Dirac operators on the two holomorphic spinor bundles. For a J-holomorphic curve, $D'_f$ coincides with the linearized Cauchy–Riemann operator, so its kernel is the direct sum of the deformation and obstruction spaces, $\mathrm{Def}_J(f)\oplus \mathrm{Obs}_J(f)$. The argument then hinges on Proposition 6.4, which states that the curvature term $R(f,\psi)$ vanishes for any spinor in the four subbundles listed in (6.1), so that the harmonicity of $f$ alone satisfies the first field equation.

What would settle it

Compute $R(f,\psi)$ explicitly for a concrete case, such as a holomorphic sphere in $\mathbb{CP}^2$ with Fubini–Study metric and a spinor $\psi\in \ker\bar\partial'_f$, and check whether the right-hand side of $g(R(f,\psi),f^*X)=\frac12\langle\psi, R^f(X,\psi)\rangle$ is identically zero; any nonzero value for a spinor in the listed kernels disproves Proposition 6.4 and Theorem 1.2. A simpler algebraic test would be to identify a Kähler manifold, a J-holomorphic curve, and a smooth section of one of the four subbundles in (6.1) for which the inner product $\langle \psi_t, D_{f_t}\psi_t\rangle$ changes when $f$ is varied.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.2: if $(M,J,g,\omega)$ is Kähler and $f:\Sigma\to M$ is J-holomorphic, then any section $\psi$ of the twisted spinor bundle lying in one of the four spaces $\ker \bar\partial'_f \oplus \ker \bar\partial''_f$, $\ker \bar\partial'^*_f \oplus \ker \bar\partial''^*_f$, $\ker \bar\partial'_f \oplus \ker \bar\partial''^*_f$, or $\ker \bar\partial''_f \oplus \ker \bar\partial'^*_f$ makes the pair $(f,\psi)$ a solution of the Dirac-harmonic system $\tau(f)=R(f,\psi)$, $D_f\psi=0$. The proof combines three facts: $f$ is harmonic, so $\tau(f)=0$; Proposition 6.4 gives $R(f,\psi)=0$ for these spinors; and the four spaces are exactly the kernels of the two twisted Dolbeault–Dirac operators $D'_f$ and $D''_f$, so $D_f\psi=0$ automatically. Consequently, for a regular curve, every tangent vector of the moduli space of J-holomorphic curves is a Dirac-harmonic map.

Load-bearing premise

The argument collapses if the curvature term $R(f,\psi)$ fails to vanish for the four families of twisted spinors, and that vanishing is proved by a short computation that partly defers to a reference; if the vanishing were false, the pairs would solve the Dirac equation but not the full coupled system.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every regular J-holomorphic curve $f$ has a natural family of Dirac-harmonic partners: all spinors in the four kernel spaces listed in Theorem 1.2.
The moduli space $\mathcal{M}(A,J)$ of J-holomorphic curves in a fixed homology class $A$ is, when regular, a smooth manifold of real dimension $2n(1-g_\Sigma)+2c_1(A)$, and its entire tangent bundle consists of Dirac-harmonic maps.
For a Calabi–Yau target and a regular rational curve, the deformation space has complex dimension $n$, giving an $n$-complex-dimensional family of Dirac-harmonic maps over the curve.
The same construction works for twisted Spin$^c$-structures $S^c\otimes L$, and for $L=K^{1/2}$ it recovers the spinor bundle of a spin structure; indices shift to $n(1-g_\Sigma+c_1(L))\pm c_1(A)$.
In the A-model of topological string theory, the kernel $\ker \bar\partial'_f$ is the space of $\chi$-zero modes, so the Dirac-harmonic pairs produced here are exactly the objects that localize the path integral to the moduli space.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The theorem suggests a converse that the paper does not state: on a regular curve, the full space of Dirac-harmonic maps with $f$ held fixed may be precisely the union of the four kernel spaces; checking this would require showing that any spinor solving $D_f\psi=0$ and satisfying $R(f,\psi)=0$ lies in one of them.
The same mechanism should generalize to orbifold or degenerate curves, where the moduli space has a virtual fundamental class; if the curvature vanishing persists, virtual tangent vectors would also be Dirac-harmonic, linking the paper's result to Gromov–Witten theory with fermions.
A direct extension to almost Kähler targets with a Hermitian connection with torsion would fail at $\tau(f)=0$, as the paper itself notes in Remark 6.3; the Dirac-harmonic pair equation would need the curvature term to compensate the torsion, which could be explored in examples.
Because the spinors in the four spaces solve $D_f\psi=0$ by construction, the resulting Dirac-harmonic maps are 'uncoupled' in the literature's terminology; one could test whether non-uncoupled solutions also exist near these curves, which would strengthen or bound the universality of the construction.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper does what it says: for a J-holomorphic curve from a Riemann surface to a Kähler manifold, it exhibits four vector spaces of spinors that pair with the map to give Dirac-harmonic pairs. The main mechanism is not new—it appears in the proof of Sun's Theorem 1.1 (ref [25]), and the author says so in Remarks 1.4 and 7.5. What is new is the canonical Spin^c packaging, the extension to twisted line bundles, and the observation that when the moduli space is smooth, its tangent bundle consists of Dirac-harmonic maps. That last point is nice and follows immediately once you identify the tangent space with ker ∂bar'_f.

The paper is honest and well organized. Proposition 1.1 decomposes the twisted Dirac operator into two Dolbeault–Dirac operators; Proposition 6.2 is the standard fact that J-holomorphic curves are harmonic; Proposition 6.4 is the curvature vanishing that makes the construction work. I checked the logic of Theorem 1.2, and the four spaces in (1.2) match the four subbundles in (6.1). The index computations are standard HRR. The stress-test note confirms this, and my own reading agrees.

The soft spot is Proposition 6.4. The proof is two paragraphs, with the main case delegated to [25] and the Spin^c adaptation sketched. That is not fatal—the vanishing survives direct checking, using the variation formula and the orthogonality of Weyl factors and target types—but a referee should ask for a bit more detail there. The A-model section (Section 5) is explicitly heuristic; it does not affect the main theorem, but it is not a rigorous contribution. The paper also does not overclaim: the four spaces are not kernels of the full Dirac operator but of the individual Dolbeault operators, and the author is clear about that.

Who is this for? Specialists in Dirac-harmonic maps, and symplectic geometers who want the Spin^c version of the uncoupled construction. It will not change the field, but it is a legitimate extension and a well-written one. I would send it to a referee, with a request to expand the proof of Proposition 6.4. If I were working on Dirac-harmonic maps, I would cite it.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper considers Dirac-harmonic maps from a closed Riemann surface Σ with its canonical Spin^c structure to a Kähler manifold (M,J,g,ω). The twisted Dirac operator D_f along a map f is decomposed into two Dolbeault-type operators D_f' and D_f'' corresponding to the decomposition f^*T_CM = f^*T^{1,0}M ⊕ f^*T^{0,1}M (Proposition 1.1). When f is J-holomorphic, D_f' is the linearization of the Cauchy–Riemann operator and its kernel is the direct sum of the deformation and obstruction spaces. The main theorem (Theorem 1.2) asserts that if ψ lies in any of the four spaces formed by kernels of ∂bar'_f, ∂bar''_f and their adjoints, then (f,ψ) solves the Dirac-harmonic system. A corollary states that under a regularity assumption the tangent bundle of the moduli space of J-holomorphic curves consists of Dirac-harmonic maps. The paper also sketches a relation to the A-model and extends the construction to twisted Spin^c structures.

Significance. The construction is explicit and, if correct, gives a large supply of Dirac-harmonic maps from J-holomorphic curves, with the tangent space of the moduli space providing a natural family. The paper is largely self-contained and the main line of proof is transparent: Proposition 6.2 gives τ(f)=0, Proposition 6.4 gives R(f,ψ)=0 on the relevant subbundles, and Proposition 1.1 identifies the kernel of D_f with the listed spaces. The index computations are standard and check out. The only substantive weakness is that the proof of Proposition 6.4 is too compressed and, as written, invokes a variational formula whose hypothesis is not met; the statement is nevertheless true and the gap is repairable. No free parameters or fitting are involved, and the four candidate spinor spaces are defined independently of the conclusion.

major comments (1)

[Section 6, Proposition 6.4] The proof of Proposition 6.4 invokes equation (2.4) to identify the t-derivative of ∫⟨ψ_t,D_{f_t}ψ_t⟩ with 2∫g(R(f,ψ),f^*X). However, equation (2.4) was derived in Section 2 (and Appendix B) under the assumption D_fψ=0, which is not made in Proposition 6.4 and is false for a general section of the subbundles in (6.1). For example, a generic smooth section of Sc+⊗(T^{1,0}_fM⊕T^{0,1}_fM) is not D_f-harmonic. Thus the displayed equality is not justified as written. The proposition itself is correct: for each of the four subbundles, the inner product ⟨ψ_t,D_{f_t}ψ_t⟩ vanishes pointwise for all t, and the terms in the full variation formula that involve D_fψ vanish by orthogonality of Sc+ with Sc− and of T^{1,0}M with T^{0,1}M; alternatively one can check directly that ⟨ψ,R^f(X,ψ)⟩=0 termwise. Since Theorem 1.2 rests on Proposition 6.4, the proof should be rewritten to give this argument explicitly.

minor comments (5)

[Theorem 1.2 / eq. (1.2)] The four vector spaces in (1.2) are not literally subspaces of Γ(Sc⊗f^*T_CM) as written; one has to use the canonical isomorphisms Γ(f^*T^{1,0}M)≅Γ(Sc+⊗f^*T^{1,0}M), Ω^{0,1}(f^*T^{1,0}M)≅Γ(Sc-⊗f^*T^{1,0}M), and the analogous identifications for T^{0,1}M. Please state these embeddings explicitly, also in Corollary 7.2 and (7.1).
[Section 2 / Appendix B] Related to the major comment: equation (2.4) should explicitly recall that it assumes D_fψ=0, or the proof of Proposition 6.4 should quote the general variation formula from Appendix B instead of the specialized formula (2.4).
[Section 5, Definition 5.1] In the definition of the B-model bundle, ∆_B = ∆_+(-) ⊕ ∆_-(-), the summand ∆_-(-) also appears in the A-model; a one-sentence explanation of the distinct roles of the two twists would prevent confusion.
[Corollary 4.2(4)] The two summands in the description of ker D_f'' are written as duals of H^1 and H^0 of K_Σ⊗f^*T^{1,0}M; for readability, add a parenthetical that Serre duality is applied to f^*T^{0,1}M ≅ (f^*T^{1,0}M)^*.
[Remark 6.5] The description of the first two subbundles as '(∓i)-eigenspaces of dvol_h' relies on the sign convention in equation (3.2); it would help to write the eigenvalues explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: Theorem 1.2 checks D_f ψ = 0 by construction, and the curvature vanishing in Proposition 6.4 is an independent algebraic calculation delegated to an external source.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, Theorem 1.2, is not circular. For a J-holomorphic curve f, the tension field vanishes by standard Kähler geometry (Proposition 6.2), and the spinor condition D_f ψ = 0 holds by definition of the four direct-sum spaces in (1.2), since the twisted Dirac operator decomposes as D_f = D_f' + D_f'' into twisted Dolbeault–Dirac operators and the kernel of each D_f' and D_f'' is the direct sum of the kernel of the Dolbeault operator and the kernel of its adjoint. The only nontrivial input is the curvature term R(f,ψ) = 0 for spinors in the four subbundles of (6.1), proved in Proposition 6.4. That vanishing is an algebraic orthogonality/chirality calculation, and the proof is delegated to [25], which is an external paper by L. Sun, not a self-citation. The alternative argument in the proof of Proposition 6.4 also derives the vanishing from the variation formula, and the claim itself is checked directly from the definition of R(f,ψ) in Appendix B. No fitted parameters are introduced, no quantity is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing assumption is justified only by the author's own prior work. The dependence on [25] for the curvature computation is external support, not circularity. The correct finding is therefore no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters and no new entities. The proof uses standard spin geometry, complex geometry, and index theory; the least explicit input is the vanishing of the curvature term in Prop 6.4, adapted from [25].

assumptions (6)

standard math Canonical Spin^c structure on a Riemann surface has Sc+=C, Sc-=K^{-1} and Dirac operator sqrt(2)(∂bar+∂bar^*).
Section 3, Lemma 3.1, cited to [18]; this fixes the spinor bundles and Dirac operator used throughout.
standard math On a Kähler manifold with Levi-Civita connection, every J-holomorphic curve is harmonic and has tau(f)=0.
Proposition 6.2, citing [12] and [23]; this supplies the first Euler-Lagrange equation for the constructed pairs.
domain assumption For spinors in the four subbundles of (6.1), the curvature term R(f,psi) vanishes.
Proposition 6.4; the proof is sketched and delegated to [25], making this the most fragile external input.
standard math Hirzebruch-Riemann-Roch index formulas for the twisted Dolbeault operators hold as stated.
Used in Prop 1.1 and Cor 7.2 to compute indices and the moduli dimension.
domain assumption Regular pairs (f,J) have smooth local moduli with tangent space ker ∂bar'_f.
Remark 4.4 and Corollary 1.3, from [22,23,26]; this is assumed for the moduli-tangent statement.
standard math Serre duality identifies coker ∂bar with H^1 and dual spaces as used in Cor 4.2.
Section 4, Corollary 4.2(4); used to express kernels of the adjoint Dolbeault operators.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of J-holomorphic curves and Dirac-harmonic maps." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4EWC47V4

@misc{pith2026190802275,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: J-holomorphic curves and Dirac-harmonic maps},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4EWC47V4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.02275}
}

read the original abstract

Dirac-harmonic maps are critical points of a fermionic action functional, generalizing the Dirichlet energy for harmonic maps. We consider the case where the source manifold is a closed Riemann surface with the canonical Spin^c-structure determined by the complex structure and the target space is a Kaehler manifold. If the underlying map f is a J-holomorphic curve, we determine a space of spinors on the Riemann surface which form Dirac-harmonic maps together with f. For suitable complex structures on the target manifold the tangent bundle to the moduli space of J-holomorphic curves consists of Dirac-harmonic maps. We also discuss the relation to the A-model of topological string theory.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

[25]

Sun, A note on the uncoupled Dirac-harmonic maps from K¨ ahler spi n manifolds to K¨ ahler manifolds, Manuscripta Math

L. Sun, A note on the uncoupled Dirac-harmonic maps from K¨ ahler spi n manifolds to K¨ ahler manifolds, Manuscripta Math. 155 (2018), no. 1-2, 197–208

work page 2018
[1]

Alvarez-Gaum´ e, D

L. Alvarez-Gaum´ e, D. Z. Freedman, The background ﬁeld method and the ultraviolet structure of the supersymmetric nonlinear σ -model, Annals Phys. 134 (1981) 85–109

work page 1981
[2]

Ammann, N

B. Ammann, N. Ginoux, Dirac-harmonic maps from index theory, Calc. V ar. Partial Differential Equations 47 (2013), no. 3-4, 739–762

work page 2013
[3]

Ammann, N

B. Ammann, N. Ginoux, Some examples of Dirac-harmonic maps , Lett. Math. Phys. 109 (2019), no. 5, 1205–1218

work page 2019
[4]

M. F. Atiyah, Riemann surfaces and spin structures , Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) 4 (1971) 47–62

work page 1971
[5]

Berline, E

N. Berline, E. Getzler, M. V ergne, Heat kernels and Dirac operators . Corrected reprint of the 1992 original. Grundlehren Text Editions. Springer-V erlag, Berlin, 2004. x+363 pp

work page 1992
[6]

Branding, Dirac-harmonic maps with torsion , Commun

V . Branding, Dirac-harmonic maps with torsion , Commun. Contemp. Math. 18 (2016), no. 4, 1550064, 19 pp. J-HOLOMORPHIC CURVES AND DIRAC-HARMONIC MAPS 21

work page 2016
[7]

C. G. Callan, Jr., D. Friedan, E. J. Martinec, M. J. Perry, Strings in background ﬁelds , Nucl. Phys. B262 (1985) 593–609

work page 1985

Show all 29 references

[8]

Q. Chen, J. Jost, J. Li, G. Wang, Regularity theorems and energy identities for Dirac-harmonic maps, Math. Z. 251 (2005), no. 1, 61–84

2005
[9]

Q. Chen, J. Jost, J. Li, G. Wang, Dirac-harmonic maps, Math. Z. 254 (2006), no. 2, 409–432

2006
[10]

Q. Chen, J. Jost, L. Sun, M. Zhu, Dirac-harmonic maps between Riemann surfaces , Asian J. Math. 23 (2019), no. 1, 107–125

2019
[11]

Q. Chen, J. Jost, G. Wang, Liouville theorems for Dirac-harmonic maps , J. Math. Phys. 48 (2007), no. 11, 113517, 13 pp

2007
[12]

Eells, Jr., J

J. Eells, Jr., J. H. Sampson, Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds , Amer. J. Math. 86 (1964) 109–160

1964
[13]

Friedrich, Dirac operators in Riemannian geometry

T. Friedrich, Dirac operators in Riemannian geometry . Graduate Studies in Mathematics, 25. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2000. xvi+ 195

2000
[14]

Ginoux, The Dirac spectrum

N. Ginoux, The Dirac spectrum. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1976. Springer-V erlag, Berlin,

1976
[15]

Groeger, Holomorphic supercurves and supersymmetric sigma models , J

J. Groeger, Holomorphic supercurves and supersymmetric sigma models , J. Math. Phys. 52 (2011), no. 12, 123505, 21 pp

2011
[16]

Groeger, Compactness for holomorphic supercurves, Geom

J. Groeger, Compactness for holomorphic supercurves, Geom. Dedicata 170 (2014), 347–384

2014
[17]

Groeger, Transversality for holomorphic supercurves , Math

J. Groeger, Transversality for holomorphic supercurves , Math. Phys. Anal. Geom. 17 (2014), no. 3-4, 341–367

2014
[18]

Hitchin, Harmonic spinors, Advances in Math

N. Hitchin, Harmonic spinors, Advances in Math. 14 (1974), 1–55

1974
[19]

J. Jost, E. Keßler, J. Tolksdorf, R. Wu, M. Zhu, Regularity of solutions of the nonlinear sigma model with gravitino, Comm. Math. Phys. 358 (2018), no. 1, 171–197

2018
[20]

J. Jost, X. Mo, M. Zhu, Some explicit constructions of Dirac-harmonic maps, J. Geom. Phys. 59 (2009), no. 11, 1512–1527

2009
[21]

H. B. Lawson, Jr., M.-L. Michelsohn, Spin geometry , Princeton Mathematical Series, 38. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1989. xii+427 p p. ISBN: 0-691-08542-0

1989
[22]

McDuff, D

D. McDuff, D. Salamon, J-holomorphic curves and quantum cohomology . University Lecture Series 6. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1994. vii i+207 pp

1994
[23]

McDuff, D

D. McDuff, D. Salamon, J-holomorphic curves and symplectic topology . Second edition. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, 52. American Mathematical Soci- ety, Providence, RI, 2012. xiv+726 pp

2012
[24]

Mo, Some rigidity results for Dirac-harmonic maps, Publ

X. Mo, Some rigidity results for Dirac-harmonic maps, Publ. Math. Debrecen 77 (2010), no. 3- 4, 427–442

2010
[26]

M. F. Tehrani, K. Fukaya, Gromov-Witten theory via Kuranishi structures . in: Virtual funda- mental cycles in symplectic topology, 111–252, Math. Surve ys Monogr. 237, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2019

2019
[27]

Witten, Topological sigma models, Comm

E. Witten, Topological sigma models, Comm. Math. Phys. 118 (1988), no. 3, 411–449

1988
[28]

Witten, Mirror manifolds and topological ﬁeld theory

E. Witten, Mirror manifolds and topological ﬁeld theory . Essays on mirror manifolds, 120–158, Int. Press, Hong Kong, 1992

1992
[29]

Yang, A structure theorem of Dirac-harmonic maps between spheres , Calc

L. Yang, A structure theorem of Dirac-harmonic maps between spheres , Calc. V ar. Partial Dif- ferential Equations 35 (2009), no. 4, 409–420. FACHBEREICH MATHEMATIK , U NIVERSIT ¨AT STUTTGART , P FAFFENWALDRING 57, 70569 STUTTGART , G ERMANY E-mail address: mark.hamilton@math.lmu.de

2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [25]

Sun, A note on the uncoupled Dirac-harmonic maps from K¨ ahler spi n manifolds to K¨ ahler manifolds, Manuscripta Math

L. Sun, A note on the uncoupled Dirac-harmonic maps from K¨ ahler spi n manifolds to K¨ ahler manifolds, Manuscripta Math. 155 (2018), no. 1-2, 197–208

work page 2018

[2] [1]

Alvarez-Gaum´ e, D

L. Alvarez-Gaum´ e, D. Z. Freedman, The background ﬁeld method and the ultraviolet structure of the supersymmetric nonlinear σ -model, Annals Phys. 134 (1981) 85–109

work page 1981

[3] [2]

Ammann, N

B. Ammann, N. Ginoux, Dirac-harmonic maps from index theory, Calc. V ar. Partial Differential Equations 47 (2013), no. 3-4, 739–762

work page 2013

[4] [3]

Ammann, N

B. Ammann, N. Ginoux, Some examples of Dirac-harmonic maps , Lett. Math. Phys. 109 (2019), no. 5, 1205–1218

work page 2019

[5] [4]

M. F. Atiyah, Riemann surfaces and spin structures , Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) 4 (1971) 47–62

work page 1971

[6] [5]

Berline, E

N. Berline, E. Getzler, M. V ergne, Heat kernels and Dirac operators . Corrected reprint of the 1992 original. Grundlehren Text Editions. Springer-V erlag, Berlin, 2004. x+363 pp

work page 1992

[7] [6]

Branding, Dirac-harmonic maps with torsion , Commun

V . Branding, Dirac-harmonic maps with torsion , Commun. Contemp. Math. 18 (2016), no. 4, 1550064, 19 pp. J-HOLOMORPHIC CURVES AND DIRAC-HARMONIC MAPS 21

work page 2016

[8] [7]

C. G. Callan, Jr., D. Friedan, E. J. Martinec, M. J. Perry, Strings in background ﬁelds , Nucl. Phys. B262 (1985) 593–609

work page 1985