Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Generative AI in the Software Engineering Domain: Tensions of Occupational Identity and Patterns of Identity Protection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.03571 v1 pith:4GYELGWK submitted 2024-10-04 cs.HC cs.SE

classification cs.HCcs.SE
keywords domainidentityoccupationalengineerssense-makingsoftwareworkersengineering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The adoption of generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) in organizational settings calls into question workers' roles, and relatedly, the implications for their long-term skill development and domain expertise. In our qualitative study in the software engineering domain, we build on the theoretical lenses of occupational identity and self-determination theory to understand how and why software engineers make sense of GAI for their work. We find that engineers' sense-making is contingent on domain expertise, as juniors and seniors felt their needs for competence, autonomy, and relatedness to be differently impacted by GAI. We shed light on the importance of the individual's role in preserving tacit domain knowledge as engineers engaged in sense-making that protected their occupational identity. We illustrate how organizations play an active role in shaping workers' sense-making process and propose design guidelines on how organizations and system designers can facilitate the impact of technological change on workers' occupational identity.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools