Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Quantitative Evaluation of Alternative Translations in a Corpus of Highly Dissimilar Finnish Paraphrases

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.02477 v1 pith:4H7DSTCE submitted 2021-05-06 cs.CL

Li-Hsin Chang , Sampo Pyysalo , Jenna Kanerva , Filip Ginter This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CL
keywords corpustranslationalternativeautomaticdifferencesevaluationfinnishhighly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we present a quantitative evaluation of differences between alternative translations in a large recently released Finnish paraphrase corpus focusing in particular on non-trivial variation in translation. We combine a series of automatic steps detecting systematic variation with manual analysis to reveal regularities and identify categories of translation differences. We find the paraphrase corpus to contain highly non-trivial translation variants difficult to recognize through automatic approaches.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools