Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The Hole Argument

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.09982 v1 pith:4HR3F2XE submitted 2020-09-21 physics.hist-ph gr-qc

Oliver Pooley This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.hist-phgr-qc
keywords argumentholecarefulitselfpossiblepresentationresponsesreview
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper reviews the hole argument as an argument against spacetime substantivalism. After a careful presentation of the argument itself I review possible responses.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the perturbed Friedmann equations in Newtonian Gauge

    gr-qc 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The authors derive the Friedmann equations and their first-order perturbations from Newtonian mechanics and thermodynamics, and show the perturbed equations coincide with general relativity at linear order.

Pith tools