Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Modular functors from conformal blocks of rational vertex operator algebras

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For a strongly rational vertex operator algebra, the sheaves of coinvariants form a modular functor, equipping the module category with modular fusion structure and a 3D TQFT extension.

desk verdict First proof that conformal blocks of any strongly rational VOA form a modular functor; the one sign inconsistency in Lemma 4.4.2 is a typo, but the gluing proof should be written out more fully. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.05845 v2 pith:4HTISTDN submitted 2025-07-08 math.QA math-phmath.AGmath.ATmath.MP

Chiara Damiolini , Lukas Woike This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.QAmath-phmath.AGmath.ATmath.MP MSC 17B6981T4018M2014H10
keywords modularfunctorconformalblocksvertexoperatoralgebracoinvariantssewingtheoremfusioncategoryfactorizationhomologyprojectiveflatconnection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

For a strongly rational vertex operator algebra $V$, the paper claims that the spaces of conformal blocks—the sheaves of coinvariants over moduli of marked curves—form a modular functor, meaning they satisfy the gluing and vacuum-insertion compatibilities expected of the state spaces of a two-dimensional conformal field theory. This establishes a topological property that was previously expected but unproved in this generality. If correct, the category of admissible $V$-modules inherits, entirely from curve topology, a ribbon Grothendieck–Verdier structure and then a modular fusion category structure, and the resulting modular functor extends to a once-extended three-dimensional topological field theory equivalent to the Reshetikhin–Turaev functor. The proof turns on a sign-sensitive sewing calculation, so the truth of the claim hinges on that compatibility.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the sheaf of coinvariants $\mathcal{V}_g(X_1,\dots,X_n)$ on the moduli stack $\widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n}$ of stable $n$-marked genus $g$ curves with non-zero tangent vectors, viewed as a twisted D-module through the action of the Atiyah algebra $\frac{c}{2}\mathcal{A}_\Lambda(-\widetilde{\Delta}_{g,n})$, where $c$ is the central charge and $\Lambda$ the Hodge line bundle. The proof of the modular functor axioms runs through two explicit isomorphisms of twisted D-modules: the propagation-of-vacua isomorphism $\xi^*_{n+1}\mathcal{V}_g(X_1,\dots,X_n)\cong \mathcal{V}_g(X_1,\dots,X_n,V)$ and the sewing isomorphism $\mathrm{Sp}\,\mathcal{V}_g(X_1,\dots,X_n)\cong \bigoplus_{S\text{ simple}}\mathcal{V}_{g-1}(S',S,X_1,\dots,X_n)$. The sewing map is produced from the series $I_S(q)=\sum_{d} I_{S,d}q^d$ pairing a simple module $S$ with its contragredient $S'$; rationality is what makes the coevaluation a finite sum and lets the Sewing Theorem supply the isomorphism, leaving the connection compatibility of Lemma 4.4.2 as the delicate check.

What would settle it

Recompute the compatibility (11) for a second tangent direction in the deformation, or directly for the affine VOA of $\mathfrak{sl}_2$ at level 1, checking whether the isomorphism $\mathcal{V}(X_\bullet)^{(n)}_C \to \bigoplus_S \mathcal{V}(X_\bullet,S,S')_{\widetilde{C}_{D^{(n)}}}$ is compatible with the action of $q\partial_q$ with weight $+w_S$ or $-w_S$; the wrong sign invalidates the gluing axiom and the modular functor claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Theorem 4.2.2: for every strongly rational vertex operator algebra $V$, the assignment of sheaves of coinvariants $\mathcal{V}_g(X_1,\dots,X_n)$ to marked curves defines a modular functor $(\mathrm{Surf}_{c/2},\mathcal{V})$ in the operadic sense. In concrete terms, the collection of vector bundles over the moduli stacks $\widetilde{\mathcal{M}}_{g,n}$, equipped with their projectively flat connections with logarithmic singularities, satisfies the two topological compatibility laws: forgetting a marked point (propagation of vacua, with the vacuum module $V$ inserted) and contracting an edge (sewing/gluing, with the coevaluation $\Delta=\bigoplus_S S\boxtimes S'$ inserted). The paper then derives that the category $\mathcal{C}_V$ of admissible modules becomes a ribbon Grothendieck–Verdier category and, after a rigidity argument, a modular fusion category, and that the modular functor is canonically equivalent to the Reshetikhin–Turaev functor of that category, giving a once-extended three-dimensional topological field theory.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the sewing isomorphism between coinvariants of a nodal curve and the direct sum of coinvariants of its normalization preserves the projective flat connection, a property the paper checks only along one tangent direction with an internal sign inconsistency.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • $\mathcal{C}_V$ becomes a ribbon Grothendieck–Verdier category with tensor product $M\otimes_V N=\bigoplus_S \mathcal{V}_0(M,N,S')\otimes S$ (Corollary 5.1.1).
  • By a rigidity criterion, $\mathcal{C}_V$ becomes a modular fusion category whose structure is directly read off from conformal blocks (Theorem 5.3.1).
  • $\mathcal{V}$ is canonically equivalent to the Reshetikhin–Turaev modular functor of $\mathcal{C}_V$, so it extends to a once-extended 3D topological field theory (Theorem 5.5.1).
  • The correlator classification for modular fusion categories applies verbatim: every special symmetric Frobenius algebra in $\mathcal{C}_V$ produces gluing-compatible flat sections of the conformal-block bundles (Corollary 5.5.3).
  • The mapping class group representations from conformal blocks coincide with the standard quantum-group representations, yielding semisimplicity and the Verlinde diagonalization statement (Corollary 5.5.2).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A reader could take the sign-sensitive sewing check as the place to attack the non-rational version: if the same compatibility is verified with the mode transition algebra in place of the coevaluation $\Delta$, the genus-zero $E_2$-algebra question of Section 5.6 would follow.
  • For a concrete rational example, the sign in Lemma 4.4.2 can be settled by a direct computation on the affine VOA at level one, where the projective connection is the classical Knizhnik–Zamolodchikov connection; this would either confirm the modular functor claim or isolate the failure.
  • The paper leaves open whether its topologically defined tensor product agrees with the analytically defined one; comparing the associators on the four-punctured sphere would close that gap and would also identify the appropriate comparison for the correlator construction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves that for a strongly rational vertex operator algebra V, the sheaves of coinvariants (equivalently, conformal blocks) over the moduli stacks \tilde M_{g,n} define a modular functor in the operadic sense of Brochier--Woike. The main result, Theorem 4.2.2, states that (Surf_{c/2}, V) is a modular functor, meaning the assignment of twisted D-modules satisfies propagation-of-vacua and gluing compatibilities. The authors then derive substantial consequences: the category C_V of admissible V-modules inherits a ribbon Grothendieck--Verdier structure and, via recent rigidity and skein-theoretic results, becomes a modular fusion category. Combining this with the classification of modular functors by factorization homology, they obtain an equivalence with the Reshetikhin--Turaev modular functor, an extension to a once-extended 3D TFT, and applicability of the Fuchs--Runkel--Schweigert construction of correlators.

Significance. If the technical gaps in the gluing compatibility are closed, this result settles a long-standing expectation of Ben-Zvi and Frenkel and provides a purely algebro-geometric construction of the modular fusion category attached to a rational VOA, independent of the Huang--Lepowsky analytic tensor product. The paper is well organized, and its main proof relies on independent external results, so I see no circularity: the propagation-of-vacua, sewing, and gluing theorems from [17, 19, 4, 20] do not presuppose the modular functor conclusion. The consequences for TFT and correlators are substantial and clearly explained. The main deficit is that the proof of the gluing compatibility in Section 4.4 is too terse and contains a concrete sign error; these issues are local and repairable, but they need to be addressed before the central claim is fully established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.4, Lemma 4.4.2] The displayed compatibility (11) states (q∂q)∘I_S^(n) = I_S^(n)∘q∂q − w_S·I_S^(n), but the final line of the proof concludes with '+ w_S·I_S^(n)'. This is a direct contradiction. Recomputing from the preceding line gives −w_S, since the terms −(d+w_S) and +d combine to −w_S. Thus the final sign is almost certainly a typo, but as printed the proof of the gluing isomorphism being compatible with the projective connection is invalid. This is load-bearing because Eq. (11) is exactly the condition used in Proposition 4.4.1 to promote the sewing isomorphism to an isomorphism of twisted D-modules. The sign must be corrected and the statement and proof made consistent.
  2. [Section 4.4, Proposition 4.4.1] The proof of Proposition 4.4.1 is only sketched. Lemma 4.4.2 checks compatibility with the single tangent direction q∂q on an infinitesimal neighbourhood D^(n), and the proposition is then said to 'naturally follow' from Lemma 4.4.2 and an adaptation of [4]. However, a modular Q-algebra requires isomorphisms of twisted D-modules, i.e. compatibility with the full action of the Atiyah algebra c/2 A_Λ(−Δ). The paper does not explain why the single Euler vector field q∂q, together with pullbacks of vector fields from the base, suffices to generate the relevant tangent/Atiyah sheaf in a way compatible with the sewing isomorphism, nor does it give a precise theorem from [4] or [20] with matching hypotheses. This is a load-bearing step in the proof of Theorem 4.2.2 and should be either proved in detail or replaced by a precise quotation of a theorem that verifies all required compatibilities.
  3. [Section 4.1 and proof of Theorem 4.2.2] The paper never constructs the extension Surf_{c/2} as a modular operad. Section 4.1 says that the authors will 'not explain the details of this extension' and instead describes only features of algebras over it, while the proof of Theorem 4.2.2 asserts that Surf_{c/2} qualifies as an extension in the sense of Definition 3.4.2 by appealing to Remark 3.4.1 and Proposition 4.3.1. Definition 3.4.2 requires specific properties—connected homotopy fibre, a section over genus zero, and an insertion-of-vacua property. The authors should either verify these properties explicitly or cite the exact statements in [9] or [20] where Surf_{c/2} is constructed and shown to satisfy them. As written, this is an unsupported step in the statement of the main theorem.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.3, Proposition 4.3.1] The proof assumes a family of smooth curves and says the extension to the nodal case is straightforward. A short explanation of why the logarithmic singularities do not interfere with the argument would improve the exposition.
  2. [Section 4.4, Lemma 4.4.2] The notation I_S(q), I_S^(n), and I^(n) is introduced quickly. In particular, the distinction between the infinite series and its truncation should be stated explicitly when the series is first defined, to avoid ambiguity in the subsequent computation.
  3. [Section 5.3, proof of Theorem 5.3.1] The statement that 'the quantum trace gives us an isomorphism Sk_{C_V}(S^3) ≅ k' is used without a reference. Please provide a citation for this fact in the modular fusion category setting.
  4. [General] The commutative diagram in the proof of Proposition 4.3.1 is garbled in the arXiv rendering; please ensure the typeset diagram is legible in the final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper's central theorem verifies additional compatibility conditions for already-constructed sheaves of coinvariants, using prior external results rather than presupposing the modular-functor conclusion.

full rationale

Theorem 4.2.2 does not derive coinvariants from modular functors; it starts with the vector bundles and projective connections constructed in [17,19] and checks two additional compatibilities. Propagation of vacua (Proposition 4.3.1) is proved by a direct Virasoro-action computation using the standard fact that Vir_+ acts trivially on the vacuum. Gluing (Proposition 4.4.1) invokes the Sewing Theorem from [19] to construct the isomorphism and then proves its compatibility with the projective connection. Although [19] is prior work by one of the present authors, it is a published theorem whose assumptions do not include the modular-functor conclusion, so it is independent support. The Section 5 consequences rely on general classification results from [9], [60], and skein-theoretic results from [56]; these are self-citations by the second author but they are broader theorems about modular functors and modular categories, not restatements of the present theorem. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no input is defined in terms of the output, and no uniqueness claim is imported in a way that reduces the argument to its own assumption. The sign inconsistency in Lemma 4.4.2 is a mathematical-correctness concern: the final displayed line contradicts Eq. (11), though the preceding computation yields the minus sign of Eq. (11). That is an internal proof issue, not a circularity. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained against the cited prior theorems, so the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The core construction assumes V is a strongly rational VOA; all other axioms are standard external theorems in VOA theory, moduli of curves, and category theory. No free parameters are fitted. No new entities are introduced.

assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption V is strongly rational (N-graded, CFT-type, C2-cofinite, rational, self-contragredient).
    Section 2: this is the standing hypothesis. It implies CV is semisimple and the coinvariant sheaves are vector bundles of finite rank.
  • domain assumption Coinvariants V_g(X_1,...,X_n) form a projectively flat vector bundle over M~_{g,n} with logarithmic singularities.
    Section 2.2, citing [17, 19].
  • domain assumption Propagation of Vacua: forgetting a marked point is compatible with inserting the vacuum module V.
    Section 4.3, citing [19, Theorem 4.3.1].
  • domain assumption Sewing Theorem of DGT provides the gluing isomorphism for coinvariants at the level of sheaves.
    Section 4.4, Lemma 4.4.2, citing [19, Theorem 8.5.1].
  • domain assumption The arguments of [4, Sections 7.6-7.8] and [20, Section 16] adapt to twisted D-modules and the Atiyah algebra action.
    Proposition 4.4.1: gluing compatibility is asserted to follow from these references.
  • domain assumption Classification of modular functors by factorization homology [9, Theorem 6.8].
    Used in Theorem 5.5.1 and Corollary 5.2.1.
  • domain assumption Rigidity of r-categories [22, Corollary 1.3] and skein module computations [40, 56].
    Used in Theorem 5.3.1 to prove rigidity and non-degeneracy of the braiding.
  • standard math Riemann-Hilbert correspondence between twisted D-modules with flat connection and topological local systems.
    Remark 3.3.2(c) translates between the algebro-geometric and topological pictures.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modular functors from conformal blocks of rational vertex operator algebras." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4HTISTDN

@misc{pith2026250705845,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modular functors from conformal blocks of rational vertex operator algebras},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4HTISTDN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.05845}
}
abstract

For a vertex operator algebra $V$, one may naturally define spaces of conformal blocks following a construction of Frenkel-Ben-Zvi generalized by Damiolini-Gibney-Tarasca. If $V$ is strongly rational, these spaces of conformal blocks form vector bundles over a suitable moduli space of algebraic curves. In this article, we establish, under the same assumptions, the widely expected topological result that the spaces of conformal blocks produce a modular functor, i.e. a modular algebra over an extension of the surface operad. This entails that the category $\mathcal{C}_V$ of admissible $V$-modules inherits from the topology of genus zero surfaces a ribbon Grothendieck-Verdier structure that leads even to the structure of a modular fusion category whose structure comes directly from the spaces of conformal blocks of $V$. As a direct consequence, we prove that the modular functor from conformal blocks extends to a three-dimensional topological field theory and comes with a description in terms of factorization homology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.05845 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of Surf and of Π1(Mf). 3.3. Modular algebras over modular operads. Given a modular operad O—such as Surf—we can define algebras over it with values in any symmetric monoidal bicategory S. The case relevant for this article is S = Rexf , the symmetric monoidal bicategory of finite categories [21] over C. The objects of Rexf are linear abelian categories with finite-dimensional morphism spaces, finitely m… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Maps in Graphs inducing the associator in CV . In other words, the fact that V is a modular functor means that V comes equipped with natural isomorphisms between the space of coinvariants associated to a marked curve (C, P•, τ•) and the space of coinvariants associated to all possible degenerations of (C, P•, τ•). Given a P 1 marked by 4 distinct points (with non-zero tangent data), we can [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Construction of Correlators in Finite Rigid Logarithmic Conformal Field Theory

    math.QA 2025-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    For any non-semisimple modular category, special symmetric Frobenius algebras now give all consistent open-closed correlators, with a holographic description and a Batalin-Vilkovisky structure on local operators.

  2. Reflection Equivariance and the Heisenberg Picture for Spaces of Conformal Blocks

    math.QA 2025-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Orientation reversal of surfaces corresponds algebraically to the modified trace, and reflection equivariant modular functors are exactly those whose circle category is modular and whose conformal blocks are the uniqu...

  3. How are pseudo-$q$-traces related to (co)ends?

    math.QA 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The pseudo-q-trace construction is shown to be the same, through the sewing-factorization theorem, as the categorical end over the module category, proving conjectures of Gainutdinov-Runkel and Arike-Nagatomo.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [4]

    Bakalov and A

    B. Bakalov and A. Kirillov, Jr. Lectures on tensor categories and modular functors , volume 21 of University Lecture Series . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2001

    work page 2001

  2. [9]

    Brochier and L

    A. Brochier and L. Woike. A classification of modular func tors via factorization homology, 2023. arXiv:2212.11259

    arXiv 2023

  3. [20]

    Deshpande and S

    T. Deshpande and S. Mukhopadhyay. Crossed modular cate gories and the Verlinde formula for twisted conformal blocks. Camb. J. Math. , 11(1):159–297, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [1]

    Allen, S

    R. Allen, S. Lentner, C. Schweigert, and S. Wood. Duality structures for module categories of vertex operator algebras and the Feigin Fuchs boson. Selecta Math. New Ser. , 31(36), 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [2]

    J. E. Andersen and K. Ueno. Construction of the Witten-Re shetikhin-Turaev TQFT from conformal field theory. Invent. Math., 201(2):519–559, 2015

    work page 2015

  6. [3]

    Ayala and J

    D. Ayala and J. Francis. Factorization homology of topol ogical manifolds. J. Topol., 8(4):1045–1084, 2015

    work page 2015

  7. [5]

    Beilinson and V

    A. Beilinson and V. Drinfeld. Chiral algebras , volume 51 of American Mathematical Society Collo- quium Publications . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004

    work page 2004

  8. [6]

    Beilinson, B

    A. Beilinson, B. Feigin, and B. Mazur. Notes on conformal field theory. 1991. A vailable at https://www.math.stonybrook.edu/ kirillov/manuscripts/bfmn.pdf

    work page 1991

Show all 77 references
  1. [7]

    Ben-Zvi, A

    D. Ben-Zvi, A. Brochier, and D. Jordan. Integrating quan tum groups over surfaces. J. Topol. , 11(4):874–917, 2018

    2018

  2. [8]

    Boyarchenko and V

    M. Boyarchenko and V. Drinfeld. A duality formalism in th e spirit of Grothendieck and Verdier. Quantum Topol., 4(4):447–489, 2013

    2013

  3. [10]

    G. Codogni. Vertex algebras and Teichmüller modular fo rms, 2020. arXiv:1901.03079

    2020 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Costello

    K. Costello. The A-infinity operad and the moduli space o f curves, 2004. arXiv:0402015

    2004

  5. [12]

    Costello and O

    K. Costello and O. Gwilliam. Factorization Algebras in Quantum Field Theory , volume 31 of New Mathematical Monographs . Cambridge University Press, 2016

    2016

  6. [13]

    Damiolini and A

    C. Damiolini and A. Gibney. On global generation of vect or bundles on the moduli space of curves from representations of vertex operator algebras. Algebr. Geom. , 10(3):298–326, 2023

    2023

  7. [14]

    Damiolini, A

    C. Damiolini, A. Gibney, and D. Krashen. Conformal bloc ks on smoothings via mode transition algebras. Comm. Math. Phys. , 406:131, 2025

    2025

  8. [15]

    Damiolini, A

    C. Damiolini, A. Gibney, and D. Krashen. Factorization presentations. In Higher dimensional alge- braic geometry—a volume in honor of V. V. Shokurov , volume 489 of London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. , pages 163–191. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2025

    2025

  9. [16]

    Damiolini, A

    C. Damiolini, A. Gibney, and D. Krashen. Morita equival ences for Zhu’s algebra, 2025. arXiv:2403.11855

    2025 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Damiolini, A

    C. Damiolini, A. Gibney, and N. Tarasca. Conformal bloc ks from vertex algebras and their connec- tions on Mg,n. Geom. Topol., 25(5):2235–2286, 2021

    2021

  11. [18]

    Damiolini, A

    C. Damiolini, A. Gibney, and N. Tarasca. Vertex algebra s of CohFT-type. In Facets of algebraic geometry. Vol. I , volume 472 of London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. , pages 164–189. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2022

    2022

  12. [19]

    Damiolini, A

    C. Damiolini, A. Gibney, and N. Tarasca. On factorizati on and vector bundles of conformal blocks from vertex algebras. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) , 57(1):241–292, 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    Etingof and V

    P. Etingof and V. Ostrik. Finite tensor categories. Mosc. Math. J. , 4(3):627–654, 782–783, 2004

    2004

  14. [22]

    Etingof and D

    P. Etingof and D. Penneys. Rigidity of non-negligible o bjects of moderate growth in braided cate- gories, 2024. arXiv:2412.17681

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Farb and D

    B. Farb and D. Margalit. A primer on mapping class groups , volume 49 of Princeton Mathematical Series. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2012

    2012

  16. [24]

    Fjelstad, J

    J. Fjelstad, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert. TFT construction of RCFT correlators. V. Proof of modular invariance and factorisation. Theory Appl. Categ. , 16:No. 16, 342–433, 2006. MODULAR FUNCTORS FROM CONFORMAL BLOCKS OF VOAS 29

    2006

  17. [25]

    Fjelstad, J

    J. Fjelstad, J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert. Uni queness of open/closed rational CFT with given algebra of open states. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. , 12(6):1283–1375, 2008

    2008

  18. [26]

    Frenkel and D

    E. Frenkel and D. Ben-Zvi. Vertex algebras and algebraic curves , volume 88 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, second ed ition, 2004

    2004

  19. [27]

    I. B. Frenkel, Y.-Z. Huang, and J. Lepowsky. On axiomati c approaches to vertex operator algebras and modules. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , 104(494):viii+64, 1993

    1993

  20. [28]

    Fuchs, T

    J. Fuchs, T. Gannon, G. Schaumann, and C. Schweigert. Th e logarithmic Cardy case: boundary states and annuli. Nuclear Phys. B , 930:287–327, 2018

    2018

  21. [29]

    Fuchs, I

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert. TFT constructio n of RCFT correlators. I. Partition functions. Nuclear Phys. B , 646(3):353–497, 2002

    2002

  22. [30]

    Fuchs, I

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert. TFT constructio n of RCFT correlators. II. Unoriented world sheets. Nuclear Phys. B , 678(3):511–637, 2004

    2004

  23. [31]

    Fuchs, I

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert. TFT constructio n of RCFT correlators. III. Simple currents. Nuclear Phys. B , 694(3):277–353, 2004

    2004

  24. [32]

    Fuchs, I

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert. TFT constructio n of RCFT correlators. IV. Structure con- stants and correlation functions. Nuclear Phys. B , 715(3):539–638, 2005

    2005

  25. [33]

    Fuchs, I

    J. Fuchs, I. Runkel, and C. Schweigert. Twenty five years of two-dimensional rational conformal field theory. J. Math. Phys. , 51(1):015210, 19, 2010

    2010

  26. [34]

    Fuchs, G

    J. Fuchs, G. Schaumann, and C. Schweigert. Eilenberg-W atts calculus for finite categories and a bimodule Radford S4 theorem. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 373(1):1–40, 2020

    2020

  27. [35]

    Fuchs and C

    J. Fuchs and C. Schweigert. Consistent systems of corre lators in non-semisimple conformal field theory. Adv. Math. , 307:598–639, 2017

    2017

  28. [36]

    Fuchs and C

    J. Fuchs and C. Stigner. On Frobenius algebras in rigid m onoidal categories. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. Sect. C Theme Issues , 33(2):175–191, 2008

    2008

  29. [37]

    Getzler and M

    E. Getzler and M. M. Kapranov. Cyclic operads and cyclic homology. In Geometry, topology, & physics, volume IV of Conf. Proc. Lecture Notes Geom. Topology , pages 167–201. Int. Press, Cam- bridge, MA, 1995

    1995

  30. [38]

    Getzler and M

    E. Getzler and M. M. Kapranov. Modular operads. Compositio Math. , 110(1):65–126, 1998

    1998

  31. [39]

    P. Godfard. Semisimplicity of conformal blocks, 2025. arXiv:2507.06318

    2025 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Gunningham, D

    S. Gunningham, D. Jordan, and P. Safronov. The finitenes s conjecture for skein modules. Invent. Math., 232(1):301–363, 2023

    2023

  33. [41]

    Geometric construction of mod ular functors from conformal field theory

    A. Henriques. Letter on “Geometric construction of mod ular functors from conformal field theory” and “Construction of the Reshetikhin–Turaev TQFT from conf ormal field theory” by Jørgen An- dersen and Kenji Ueno, 2025. http://andreghenriques.com/ PDF/AndersenUeno.pdf

    2025

  34. [42]

    Y.-Z. Huang. A theory of tensor products for module cate gories for a vertex operator algebra. IV. J. Pure Appl. Algebra , 100(1-3):173–216, 1995

    1995

  35. [43]

    Y.-Z. Huang. Vertex operator algebras, the Verlinde co njecture, and modular tensor categories. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA , 102(15):5352–5356, 2005

    2005

  36. [44]

    Y.-Z. Huang. Rigidity and modularity of vertex tensor c ategories. Commun. Contemp. Math. , 10:871–911, 2008

    2008

  37. [45]

    Y.-Z. Huang. Vertex operator algebras and the Verlinde Conjecture. Comm. Contemp. Math. , 10(1):103–154, 2008

    2008

  38. [46]

    Huang and J

    Y.-Z. Huang and J. Lepowsky. A theory of tensor products for module categories for a vertex oper- ator algebra. I. Number 883, pages 148–203. 1994. Geometric aspects of infinite integrable systems (Japanese) (Kyoto, 1993)

    1994

  39. [47]

    Huang and J

    Y.-Z. Huang and J. Lepowsky. A theory of tensor products for module categories for a vertex operator algebra. I, II. Selecta Math. (N.S.) , 1(4):699–756, 757–786, 1995

    1995

  40. [48]

    Huang and J

    Y.-Z. Huang and J. Lepowsky. A theory of tensor products for module categories for a vertex operator algebra. III. J. Pure Appl. Algebra , 100(1-3):141–171, 1995

    1995

  41. [49]

    Huang, J

    Y.-Z. Huang, J. Lepowsky, and L. Zhang. Logarithmic ten sor category theory, I- VIII. arXiv:1012.4193, arXiv:1012.4196, arXiv:1012.419 7, arXiv:1012.4198, arXiv:1012.4199, arXiv:1012.4202, arXiv:1110.1929, arXiv:1110.1931

    1929 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Kapustin and N

    A. Kapustin and N. Saulina. Surface operators in 3d topo logical field theory and 2d rational con- formal field theory. In Mathematical foundations of quantum field theory and pertur bative string 30 CHIARA DAMIOLINI AND LUKAS WOIKE theory, volume 83 of Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. ,...

    2011

  43. [51]

    Lepowsky and H

    J. Lepowsky and H. Li. Introduction to vertex operator algebras and their represe ntations, volume 227 of Progress in Mathematics . Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2004

    2004

  44. [52]

    J. Lurie. Higher algebra. A vailable at https://www.ma th.ias.edu/˜lurie/papers/HA.pdf

  45. [53]

    Lyubashenko

    V. Lyubashenko. Modular transformations for tensor ca tegories. J. Pure Appl. Algebra , 98(3):279– 327, 1995

    1995

  46. [54]

    Lyubashenko

    V. Lyubashenko. Ribbon abelian categories as modular c ategories. J. Knot Theory Ramifications , 5(3):311–403, 1996

    1996

  47. [55]

    V. V. Lyubashenko. Invariants of 3-manifolds and proje ctive representations of mapping class groups via quantum groups at roots of unity. Comm. Math. Phys. , 172(3):467–516, 1995

    1995

  48. [56]

    Müller and L

    L. Müller and L. Woike. Admissible skein modules and ans ular functors: A comparison. arXiv:2409.17047 [math.QA], 2024

    2024 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Moore and N

    G. Moore and N. Seiberg. Classical and quantum conforma l field theory. Comm. Math. Phys. , 123(2):177–254, 1989

    1989

  50. [58]

    Moore and N

    G. Moore and N. Seiberg. Lectures on RCFT. In Physics, geometry, and topology (Banff, AB, 1989) , volume 238 of NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. B: Phys. , pages 263–361. Plenum, New York, 1990

    1989

  51. [59]

    Moriwaki

    Y. Moriwaki. Vertex operator algebra and parenthesize d braid operad, 2024. arXiv:2209.10443

    2024 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Müller and L

    L. Müller and L. Woike. Cyclic framed little disks algeb ras, Grothendieck-Verdier duality and han- dlebody group representations. Q. J. Math. , 74(1):163–245, 2023

    2023

  53. [61]

    Müller and L

    L. Müller and L. Woike. Classification of consistent sys tems of handlebody group representations. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , (6):4767–4803, 2024

    2024

  54. [62]

    Müller and L

    L. Müller and L. Woike. The distinguished invertible ob ject as ribbon dualizing object in the Drinfeld center. Selecta Math. (N.S.) , 30(5):Paper No. 98, 27, 2024

    2024

  55. [63]

    Müller and L

    L. Müller and L. Woike. Categorified open topological fie ld theories. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 153(6):2381–2396, 2025

    2025

  56. [64]

    Nagatomo and A

    K. Nagatomo and A. Tsuchiya. Conformal field theories as sociated to regular chiral vertex operator algebras. I. Theories over the projective line. Duke Math. J. , 128(3):393–471, 2005

    2005

  57. [65]

    Reshetikhin and V

    N. Reshetikhin and V. G. Turaev. Invariants of 3-manifo lds via link polynomials and quantum groups. Invent. Math., 103(3):547–597, 1991

    1991

  58. [66]

    N. Y. Reshetikhin and V. G. Turaev. Ribbon graphs and the ir invariants derived from quantum groups. Comm. Math. Phys. , 127(1):1–26, 1990

    1990

  59. [67]

    Salvatore and N

    P. Salvatore and N. Wahl. Framed discs operads and Batal in-Vilkovisky algebras. Q. J. Math. , 54(2):213–231, 2003

    2003

  60. [68]

    C. J. Schommer-Pries. The classification of two-dimensional extended topologica l field theories . PhD thesis, Berkeley, 2009

    2009

  61. [69]

    G. Segal. Two-dimensional conformal field theories and modular functors. In IXth International Congress on Mathematical Physics (Swansea, 1988) , pages 22–37. Hilger, Bristol, 1989

    1988

  62. [70]

    Tillmann

    U. Tillmann. S -structures for k-linear categories and the definition of a modular functor. J. London Math. Soc. (2) , 58(1):208–228, 1998

    1998

  63. [71]

    Tsuchimoto

    Y. Tsuchimoto. On the coordinate-free description of t he conformal blocks. J. Math. Kyoto Univ. , 33(1):29–49, 1993

    1993

  64. [72]

    V. G. Turaev. Quantum invariants of knots and 3-manifolds , volume 18 of De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics. Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, revised edition, 2010

    2010

  65. [73]

    Verlinde

    E. Verlinde. Fusion rules and modular transformations in 2d conformal field theory. Nuclear Phys. B, 300(3):360–376, 1988

    1988

  66. [74]

    K. Walker. TQFTs. Notes available at http://canyon23.net/math/tc.pdf

  67. [75]

    E. Witten. Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial . Comm. Math. Phys. , 121(3):351–399, 1989

    1989

  68. [76]

    L. Woike. The cyclic and modular microcosm principle in quantum topology, 2024. arXiv:2408.02644 Accepted for publication in Canad. J. Math

    2024 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Y. Zhu. Global vertex operators on Riemann surfaces. Comm. Math. Phys. , 165(3):485–531, 1994. C. Damiolini, Department of Mathematics, University of Texa s at Austin, Austin TX, USA chiara.damiolini@austin.utexas.edu MODULAR FUNCTORS FROM CONFORMAL BLOCKS OF VOAS 31 L. Woike,...

    1994

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.