REVIEW 2 cited by
Validating Mechanistic Interpretations: An Axiomatic Approach
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Mechanistic interpretability aims to reverse engineer the computation performed by a neural network in terms of its internal components. Although there is a growing body of research on mechanistic interpretation of neural networks, the notion of a mechanistic interpretation itself is often ad-hoc. Inspired by the notion of abstract interpretation from the program analysis literature that aims to develop approximate semantics for programs, we give a set of axioms that formally characterize a mechanistic interpretation as a description that approximately captures the semantics of the neural network under analysis in a compositional manner. We demonstrate the applicability of these axioms for validating mechanistic interpretations on an existing, well-known interpretability study as well as on a new case study involving a Transformer-based model trained to solve the well-known 2-SAT problem.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
LAWFUL: Law-Aligned Witness for Faithful Use of Latents
LAWFUL defines coverage-aware physical-consistency scores and circuit tests, reporting that a MoCap-to-Radar transformer's 9-component temporal circuit carries Doppler-law consistency via attention patterns.
-
Toy Combinatorial Interpretability Models Reveal Lottery Tickets in Early Feature Space
In a combinatorial toy setting, winning lottery tickets preserve families of compatible feature locations in early feature space that balance proximity to final codes with low interference, rather than specific weight...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.