REVIEW 1 cited by
"Why Should I Trust Interactive Learners?" Explaining Interactive Queries of Classifiers to Users
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Although interactive learning puts the user into the loop, the learner remains mostly a black box for the user. Understanding the reasons behind queries and predictions is important when assessing how the learner works and, in turn, trust. Consequently, we propose the novel framework of explanatory interactive learning: in each step, the learner explains its interactive query to the user, and she queries of any active classifier for visualizing explanations of the corresponding predictions. We demonstrate that this can boost the predictive and explanatory powers of and the trust into the learned model, using text (e.g. SVMs) and image classification (e.g. neural networks) experiments as well as a user study.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Human-in-the-Loop User Feedback Affects Perceived Accuracy and Trust, but Task Subjectivity Matters
Interactive feedback was associated with a more negative perceived-accuracy trend in an objective face-detection task, but no such bias appeared in two subjective text-classification studies.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.