REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 51 references
Scalar baryons in neutron stars
T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read A baryon-number-carrying scalar produced inside neutron stars needs self-coupling $\lambda_4 \gtrsim 1000$ to allow two-solar-mass stars, excluding perturbative scalar baryons up to $\sim 1.5$ GeV.
desk verdict Clean, well-executed extension of dark-baryon neutron-star constraints to scalar condensates, but the central exclusion curves are conditional on an unevaluated n->phi equilibration rate. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing object is a zero-temperature complex scalar condensate in chemical equilibrium with neutrons, treated in the local-density (Thomas-Fermi) approximation. The equations $\mu_\phi^2 = m_\phi^2 + V_{\rm int}'(X)$, $n_\phi = 2\mu_\phi X$, $\varepsilon_\phi = (\mu_\phi^2 + m_\phi^2)X + V_{\rm int}(X)$, and $P_\phi = (\mu_\phi^2 - m_\phi^2)X - V_{\rm int}(X)$, with $\mu_\phi = \mu_B$, give the scalar's pressure and energy density as functions of the baryon chemical potential. These are added to a nuclear equation of state, and the combined equation of state is integrated through the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations using the enthalpy variable of Ref. [47] to produce mass-radius curves whose maximum mass must reach the observed $2\,M_\odot$. Monomial, polynomial, and attractive potentials are treated in turn; the attractive case is the homogeneous limit of the non-topological solitons known as Q-balls, and its $\varepsilon(P=0)>0$ behaviour is the hallmark of self-bound Q-matter.
What would settle it
Compute the in-medium $n\to\phi\,\bar{\nu}$ conversion rate from a specified coupling; if the resulting timescale exceeds the roughly $10^9$-year age of the observed neutron stars (rate below about $10^{-9}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$), chemical equilibrium is never reached and the $\lambda_4\gtrsim 1000$ exclusion curves for $m_\phi>m_n$ cease to apply. A positive test would be a neutron-star observation whose mass-radius curve requires the stiff $\lambda_4=1000$ equation of state predicted here.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim is that chemical equilibrium between neutrons and a complex scalar baryon $\phi$ with $B(\phi)=1$ sets in inside neutron stars once the baryon chemical potential $\mu_B$ reaches the scalar's effective production threshold: $\mu_B > m_\phi$ for repulsive self-interactions, or $\mu_B > \mu_0 < m_\phi$ when a negative $|\phi|^4$ term provides binding energy. The scalar then forms a homogeneous zero-temperature condensate described by $\mu_\phi^2 = m_\phi^2 + V_{\rm int}'(X)$ and $n_\phi = 2\mu_\phi X$, with the thermodynamic identity $\varepsilon_\phi + P_\phi = \mu_\phi n_\phi$. Because the scalar is bosonic, it contributes no Fermi pressure; without repulsive self-interactions it would condense into an almost pressureless state and drive the maximal neutron-star mass below one solar mass. Demanding $M_{\rm max} \ge 2\,M_\odot$ therefore leaves only non-perturbative repulsive couplings: $\lambda_4 \gtrsim 1000$ for a quartic $|\phi|^4$ interaction when $m_\phi < m_n$, and $\lambda_6/m_\phi^2 \gtrsim 10^6$ to $10^8\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-2}$ for a sextic $|\phi|^6$ interaction, depending on the nuclear equation of state. An attractive quartic term shifts production to $\mu_0 < m_\phi$, so even scalars heavier than the maximum core chemical potential are constrained in the fine-tuned region $\lambda_4^2 \simeq 4\lambda_6$.
Load-bearing premise
The entire exclusion picture assumes that neutrons and $\phi$ reach chemical equilibrium inside the star; if the $n\to\phi$ conversion rate is slower than the neutron star's lifetime, the condensate never forms and the bounds for $m_\phi>m_n$ disappear.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Perturbative scalar-baryon models with $B=1$ and $m_n < m_\phi < \mu_B^{\rm max}\sim 1.5$ GeV are excluded unless $\lambda_4 \gtrsim 1000$ (quartic) or $\lambda_6/m_\phi^2 \gtrsim 10^6$ GeV$^{-2}$ (sextic).
- The region $m_\phi < m_n$ is independently eliminated by fast neutron-decay bounds once conversion is fast enough to equilibrate, so the new bounds bite in the window $m_n < m_\phi < \mu_B^{\rm max}$.
- A scalar-baryon explanation of the neutron-lifetime anomaly through $n\to\phi\bar{\nu}$ requires additional long-range repulsion beyond the quartic self-interaction to survive neutron-star constraints.
- Attractive $|\phi|^4+\lambda_6|\phi|^6$ potentials allow neutron-star constraints to reach scalar masses above $\mu_B^{\rm max}$ near $\lambda_4^2 \simeq 4\lambda_6$, where the condensate is Q-matter and contributes less than about 1% of the star's mass.
- For a $B=2$ scalar $\xi$ coupled to two neutrons, the same production logic applies with threshold $2\mu_B^{\rm max}\sim 3$ GeV.
Reading between the lines
- The equilibrium assumption is quoted but not derived; a first-principles computation of $n\to\phi$ conversion in dense matter is the single most decisive check, and the exclusion figures should be read as conditional on it.
- The same condensate framework implies radial density profiles and cooling signatures beyond mass-radius; those are not computed here and could be probed with independent neutron-star observations.
- Stronger empirical statements, such as a measured gravitational-wave tidal deformability, could turn the '$\lambda_4\gtrsim 1000$' requirement into a direct test of the scalar potential shape rather than just its overall scale.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper investigates the impact of a GeV-scale complex scalar field φ carrying baryon number B=1 on the equation of state (EoS) of neutron stars. Under the assumption of chemical equilibrium between the scalar and neutrons, the authors derive the condensate EoS for repulsive monomial self-interactions (λ_N|φ|^N), for polynomial potentials, and for attractive quartic-plus-sextic potentials. Solving the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations with three CompOSE nuclear EoS, they find that supporting a 2M_⊙ neutron star requires λ_4 ≳ 1000 for quartic interactions when m_φ ≲ m_n, and even larger effective couplings for sextic interactions. For attractive potentials, scalar production can occur for m_φ > μ_B^max, yielding constraints near the Q-matter threshold. The paper benchmarks its TOV integration against published CompOSE mass-radius curves and provides data tables as ancillary files.
Significance. If the chemical-equilibrium assumption holds, the paper delivers a clean, analytic, and falsifiable set of constraints on scalar baryons that complement nucleon-decay searches. The derivation of the condensate EoS is transparent, the TOV solver is benchmarked, and the dependence on three nuclear EoS gives an honest spread of results. The conclusion that perturbative scalar baryons are excluded up to ~1.5 GeV is striking and would be an important addition to the dark-baryon literature. However, the new constraints for m_φ > m_n — precisely the region not already excluded by nucleon decays — rest entirely on the unquantified assumption of fast n↔φ equilibration.
major comments (2)
- [Sec. IV, after Eq. (14) and before Eq. (15)] The central exclusion for m_φ > m_n in Figs. 2–5 assumes that the portal couplings nνφ* and peφ* are sufficiently efficient to keep φ in chemical equilibrium over the neutron-star lifetime, but no estimate of the rate is provided. For m_φ > m_n the vacuum decay is kinematically forbidden, so the in-medium rate is controlled by the unspecified portal coupling and by Pauli blocking/phase-space factors. If the rate is slower than the star's age, the φ condensate never forms and the EoS returns to the nuclear one, in which case the m_φ > m_n exclusion curves disappear. Since the m_φ < m_n region is independently excluded by nucleon-decay searches, the genuinely new constraints are exactly the ones at risk. Please quantify the minimum rate required for equilibration (e.g., relative to the inverse neutron-star age) and give a representative order-of-magnitude estimate for the portal coupling that would achieve it, or explicitly state how the exclusions should be interpreted if equilibration is not guaranteed.
- [Sec. IVC, around Eq. (42)] The constraints for m_φ > μ_B^max in the fine-tuned region λ_4^2 ≃ 4λ_6 rely on the homogeneous Q-matter approximation, with the statement that 'a more careful treatment would keep the surface energy that was neglected here.' Because this is the only region that probes arbitrarily large scalar masses, the surface-energy correction could affect the EoS at low pressure and hence the maximum mass. Please estimate the magnitude of the surface-energy contribution (e.g., the surface tension of the Q-ball) and show that it does not shift the exclusion boundary, or qualify the constraint in this region.
minor comments (5)
- [Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 captions] The captions display 'Vint = λ_4 |ϕ 4' and 'λ_6/m_ϕ^2 |ϕ 6'; these should be '|ϕ|^4' and '|ϕ|^6' respectively, with the missing absolute-value bars and exponents.
- [Secs. IVA and IVC] The notation for the maximal baryon chemical potential is inconsistent: μ_B^max appears in Sec. IVA while μ_max^B is used in Sec. IVC; please unify.
- [Abstract and Sec. IVA] The abstract states that 'non-perturbatively large repulsive self-couplings are required,' but this statement applies primarily to m_φ ≲ m_n; for m_φ > m_n the required couplings are smaller and the μ_φ threshold is mass-dependent. Please specify the mass range in the abstract to avoid overgeneralization.
- [Sec. I and Conclusions] The paper cites only PSR J1614-2230 and PSR J0348+0432 as 2M_⊙ pulsars. More recent precision measurements (e.g., PSR J0740+6620) would strengthen the constraints; at minimum, a comment on the robustness of the 2M_⊙ threshold would be useful.
- [Sec. IVA, text before Eq. (28)] The analytic estimates 'λ_3 ∼200, λ_4 ∼4000, λ_6 ∼4×10^6' are a factor of a few above the numerical λ_4 threshold of 1000. Please state explicitly that these are order-of-magnitude estimates and not exact thresholds.
Circularity Check
No circularity: the scalar-baryon neutron-star constraints are obtained by solving the TOV equations with externally benchmarked nuclear EoS and an independently derived condensate formalism; the chemical-equilibration assumption is a stated premise, not a fitted input disguised as a prediction.
full rationale
The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and benchmarked against external inputs. The nuclear equations of state are taken from the CompOSE database (Refs. [29-32]), the scalar-condensate thermodynamic formulas are imported from the independent work of Suárez and Chavanis (Ref. [48]), and the observational benchmarks are the measured 2-solar-mass pulsars PSR J1614-2230 and PSR J0348+0432 (Refs. [15,16]). The central quantitative claims, such as 'the coupling constant lambda_4 needs to exceed 1000 to push the maximal allowed neutron-star mass above the observed 2M_sun' (Sec. IV A), are outputs of the TOV integration, not inputs: no parameter is fitted to reproduce the target mass, and the lambda thresholds are not equivalent by construction to any fitted quantity. The scalar EoS in Eqs. (22)-(26) follows from the stated Lagrangian and field equations, and the neutron-star EoS in Eqs. (28)-(29) follows from adding the scalar pressure and energy density to the nuclear ones under the explicitly stated chemical-equilibrium condition. That condition is the paper's main assumption: 'Not shown are the terms that connect phi and the nucleons, e.g. n nu phi* or p e phi*, which we assume to be sufficiently efficient to induce n->phi transitions over the lifetime of the neutron star and equilibrate baryons' (Sec. IV). This is a physical premise and a possible limitation if the conversion rates are too slow, but it is not circular: the assumption does not contain the conclusions about lambda_4 or the exclusion curves. The same holds for the analogous dark-fermion assumption in Sec. III. Self-citations appear in contextual or auxiliary roles (e.g., Refs. [1,3,10,24,51,54]), and the Q-ball-related discussion references the authors' earlier work [54], but the central scalar-baryon EoS and neutron-star constraints are re-derived in the text rather than reduced to those citations. No load-bearing self-citation chain, no fitted-input-called-prediction step, and no definitional equivalence between an input and a claimed output were found. The paper's limitations are explicitly acknowledged and are not instances of circular reasoning.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (4)
- m_phi (scalar baryon mass) =
scanned up to mu_max_B ~ 1.5 GeV
- lambda_4 (quartic self-coupling) =
threshold greater than ~1000 for m_phi below m_n (Fig. 2)
- lambda_6 (sextic self-coupling) =
effective lambda_6/m_phi^2 thresholds from ~2.6e6 to 1.0e8 GeV^-2 depending on EoS (Fig. 3)
- lambda_4, lambda_6 (attractive potential) =
lambda_4^2 < 4 lambda_6, with mu_0 much less than m_phi near equality (Fig. 5)
assumptions (5)
- domain assumption n to phi conversion is fast enough to keep mu_B = mu_phi throughout the neutron-star lifetime.
- domain assumption The condensate can be treated in the Thomas-Fermi local-density approximation with phi(t) = sqrt(X) exp(-i mu_phi t) and negligible gradients.
- domain assumption The APR, HS(DD2), and RG(SLy4) equations of state from CompOSE provide an adequate description of dense nuclear matter.
- domain assumption The homogeneous condensate energy density and pressure formulas from Suarez and Chavanis [48] are correct for the complex scalar field.
- domain assumption The scalar potential has a unique global minimum at phi = 0 in vacuum, requiring lambda_4^2 < 4 lambda_6 for the attractive model.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Scalar baryons in neutron stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4K4WAPBH
@misc{pith2026260810141,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Scalar baryons in neutron stars},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4K4WAPBH}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.10141}
}
read the original abstract
Neutron stars have baryon chemical potentials that can exceed the neutron mass, providing favorable conditions to convert neutrons to new particles carrying baryon number, even if those processes are kinematically forbidden in vacuum. We study the effect of GeV-scale scalars with baryon number on neutron stars' equation of state and show that non-perturbatively large repulsive self-couplings are required to support the observed two-solar-mass neutron stars. We also study potentials with attractive self-interactions, which can trigger scalar production even for masses above the chemical potential and resemble Coleman's Q-matter.
Figures
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Light particles with baryon and lepton numbers,
J. Heeck, “Light particles with baryon and lepton numbers,”Phys. Lett. B813(2021) 136043, [2009.01256]
arXiv 2021
-
[2]
Dark Matter interpretation of the neutron decay anomaly,
A. Strumia, “Dark Matter interpretation of the neutron decay anomaly,”JHEP02(2022) 067, [2112.09111]
arXiv 2022
-
[3]
Nucleon Decays into Light New Particles in Neutrino Detectors,
J. Heeck and I. M. Shoemaker, “Nucleon Decays into Light New Particles in Neutrino Detectors,”Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 111804, [2506.08090]
arXiv 2025
-
[4]
Nucleon Decay into a Dark Sector,
H. Davoudiasl, “Nucleon Decay into a Dark Sector,” Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 051802, [1409.4823]
arXiv 2015
-
[5]
Dark Matter Interpretation of the Neutron Decay Anomaly,
B. Fornal and B. Grinstein, “Dark Matter Interpretation of the Neutron Decay Anomaly,”Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 191801, [1801.01124]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 124, 219901 (2020)]. [6]Super-KamiokandeCollaboration, K. Abeet al., “Search for Nucleon Decay vian→¯νπ 0 andp→¯νπ + in Super-Kamiokande,”Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 121802, [1305.4391]
arXiv 2018
-
[7]
On the possibility to observe neutron dark decay in nuclei
M. Pf¨ utzner and K. Riisager, “Examining the possibility to observe neutron dark decay in nuclei,” Phys. Rev. C97(2018) 042501, [1803.01334]
work page Pith review arXiv 2018
-
[8]
How Long Does the Hydrogen Atom Live?,
D. McKeen and M. Pospelov, “How Long Does the Hydrogen Atom Live?,”Universe9no. 11, (2023) 473, [2003.02270]
arXiv 2023
-
[9]
B. Fornal, “Neutron Dark Decay,”Universe9no. 10, (2023) 449, [2306.11349]
arXiv 2023
Show all 51 references
-
[10]
Inclusive Nucleon Decay Searches as a Frontier of Baryon Number Violation,
J. Heeck and V. Takhistov, “Inclusive Nucleon Decay Searches as a Frontier of Baryon Number Violation,” Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 015005, [1910.07647]. [11]SNO+Collaboration, A. Allegaet al., “Improved search for invisible modes of nucleon decay in water with the SNO+detector,”Phy...
2020 arXiv
-
[13]
Neutron stars exclude light dark baryons,
D. McKeen, A. E. Nelson, S. Reddy, and D. Zhou, “Neutron stars exclude light dark baryons,”Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 061802, [1802.08244]
2018 arXiv
-
[14]
Testing dark decays of baryons in neutron stars,
G. Baym, D. H. Beck, P. Geltenbort, and J. Shelton, “Testing dark decays of baryons in neutron stars,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 061801, [1802.08282]
2018 arXiv
-
[15]
Shapiro Delay Measurement of A Two Solar Mass Neutron Star,
P. Demorest, T. Pennucci, S. Ransom, M. Roberts, and J. Hessels, “Shapiro Delay Measurement of A Two Solar Mass Neutron Star,”Nature467(2010) 1081–1083, [1010.5788]
2010 arXiv
-
[16]
A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary,
J. Antoniadiset al., “A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary,”Science340(2013) 6131, [1304.6875]
2013 arXiv
-
[17]
Dark decay of the neutron,
J. M. Cline and J. M. Cornell, “Dark decay of the neutron,”JHEP07(2018) 081, [1803.04961]
2018 arXiv
-
[18]
Neutron Star Stability in Light of the Neutron Decay Anomaly,
B. Grinstein, C. Kouvaris, and N. G. Nielsen, “Neutron Star Stability in Light of the Neutron Decay Anomaly,” Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 091601, [1811.06546]
2019 arXiv
-
[19]
Cosmological and astrophysical probes of dark baryons,
D. McKeen, M. Pospelov, and N. Raj, “Cosmological and astrophysical probes of dark baryons,”Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 115002, [2012.09865]
2021 arXiv
-
[20]
Neutron to Dark Matter Decay in Neutron Stars,
T. F. Motta, P. A. M. Guichon, and A. W. Thomas, “Neutron to Dark Matter Decay in Neutron Stars,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A33no. 31, (2018) 1844020, [1806.00903]
2018 arXiv
-
[21]
Probing Dark Sectors with Neutron Stars,
S. Gardner and M. Zakeri, “Probing Dark Sectors with Neutron Stars,”Universe10no. 2, (2024) 67, [2311.13649]
2024 arXiv
-
[22]
Colloquium: The neutron lifetime,
F. E. Wietfeldt and G. L. Greene, “Colloquium: The neutron lifetime,”Rev. Mod. Phys.83no. 4, (2011) 1173–1192
2011
-
[23]
A Puzzle Lies at the 8 Heart of the Atom,
G. L. Greene and P. Geltenbort, “A Puzzle Lies at the 8 Heart of the Atom,”Sci. Am.314(2016) 36
2016
-
[24]
Neutron decay into a dark sector via leptoquarks,
S. Khatibi, “Neutron decay into a dark sector via leptoquarks,”Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 055029, [2305.01727]
2023 arXiv
-
[25]
Exploring the Distribution and Impact of Bosonic Dark Matter in Neutron Stars,
D. R. Karkevandi, M. Shahrbaf, S. Shakeri, and S. Typel, “Exploring the Distribution and Impact of Bosonic Dark Matter in Neutron Stars,”Particles7 no. 1, (2024) 201–213, [2402.18696]
2024 arXiv
-
[26]
Searching for New Physics in an Ultradense Environment: A Review on Dark Matter Admixed Neutron Stars,
F. Grippa, G. Lambiase, and T. K. Poddar, “Searching for New Physics in an Ultradense Environment: A Review on Dark Matter Admixed Neutron Stars,” Universe11no. 3, (2025) 74, [2412.09381]
2025
-
[27]
Static solutions of Einstein’s field equations for spheres of fluid,
R. C. Tolman, “Static solutions of Einstein’s field equations for spheres of fluid,”Phys. Rev.55(1939) 364–373
1939
-
[28]
On massive neutron cores,
J. R. Oppenheimer and G. M. Volkoff, “On massive neutron cores,”Phys. Rev.55(1939) 374–381
1939
-
[29]
CompOSE: CompStar Online Supernovae Equations of State
CompOSE Core Team, “CompOSE: CompStar Online Supernovae Equations of State.” https://compose.obspm.fr. Accessed: 2026-06-17
2026
-
[30]
CompOSE CompStar online supernova equations of state harmonising the concert of nuclear physics and astrophysics compose.obspm.fr,
S. Typel, M. Oertel, and T. Kl¨ ahn, “CompOSE CompStar online supernova equations of state harmonising the concert of nuclear physics and astrophysics compose.obspm.fr,”Phys. Part. Nucl.46 no. 4, (2015) 633–664, [1307.5715]
2015 arXiv
-
[31]
Equations of state for supernovae and compact stars,
M. Oertel, M. Hempel, T. Kl¨ ahn, and S. Typel, “Equations of state for supernovae and compact stars,” Rev. Mod. Phys.89no. 1, (2017) 015007, [1610.03361]. [32]CompOSE Core T eamCollaboration, S. Typelet al., “CompOSE Reference Manual,”Eur. Phys. J. A58 no. 11, (2022) 221, [22...
2017 arXiv
-
[33]
One- and two-argument equation of state parametrizations with continuous sound speed for neutron star simulations,
G. Servignat, P. J. Davis, J. Novak, M. Oertel, and J. A. Pons, “One- and two-argument equation of state parametrizations with continuous sound speed for neutron star simulations,”Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 103022, [2311.02653]
2024 arXiv
-
[34]
Numerical relativity simulations of the neutron star merger GW190425: microphysics and mass ratio effects,
A. Camilletti, L. Chiesa, G. Ricigliano, A. Perego, L. C. Lippold, S. Padamata, S. Bernuzzi, D. Radice, D. Logoteta, and F. M. Guercilena, “Numerical relativity simulations of the neutron star merger GW190425: microphysics and mass ratio effects,”Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.516...
2022 arXiv
-
[35]
The equation of state of nucleon matter and neutron star structure,
A. Akmal, V. R. Pandharipande, and D. G. Ravenhall, “The equation of state of nucleon matter and neutron star structure,”Phys. Rev. C58(1998) 1804–1828, [nucl-th/9804027]
1998 arXiv
-
[36]
Inference of neutron-star properties with unified crust-core equations of state for parameter estimation,
P. J. Davis, H. D. Thi, A. F. Fantina, F. Gulminelli, M. Oertel, and L. Suleiman, “Inference of neutron-star properties with unified crust-core equations of state for parameter estimation,”Astron. Astrophys.687(2024) A44, [2406.14906]
2024 arXiv
-
[37]
Haensel, A
P. Haensel, A. Y. Potekhin, and D. G. Yakovlev, Neutron stars 1: Equation of state and structure, vol. 326. Springer, New York, USA, 2007
2007
-
[38]
Crust (unified) tool for equation-of-state reconstruction (CUTER) v2,
P. J. Davis, H. Dinh Thi, A. F. Fantina, F. Gulminelli, M. Oertel, and L. Suleiman, “Crust (unified) tool for equation-of-state reconstruction (CUTER) v2,”Eur. Phys. J. A61no. 5, (2025) 120, [2506.08658]
2025 arXiv
-
[39]
Statistical Model for a Complete Supernova Equation of State,
M. Hempel and J. Schaffner-Bielich, “Statistical Model for a Complete Supernova Equation of State,”Nucl. Phys. A837(2010) 210–254, [0911.4073]
2010 arXiv
-
[40]
Composition and thermodynamics of nuclear matter with light clusters,
S. Typel, G. Ropke, T. Klahn, D. Blaschke, and H. H. Wolter, “Composition and thermodynamics of nuclear matter with light clusters,”Phys. Rev. C81(2010) 015803, [0908.2344]
2010 arXiv
-
[41]
Nuclear Properties For Astrophysical And Radioactive-Ion-Beam Applications,
P. Moller, J. R. Nix, and K. L. Kratz, “Nuclear Properties For Astrophysical And Radioactive-Ion-Beam Applications,”Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tabl.66(1997) 131–343, [nucl-th/9601043]
1997 arXiv
-
[42]
New Equations of State in Simulations of Core-Collapse Supernovae,
M. Hempel, T. Fischer, J. Schaffner-Bielich, and M. Liebend¨ orfer, “New Equations of State in Simulations of Core-Collapse Supernovae,”Astrophys. J.748(2012) 70, [1108.0848]
2012 arXiv
-
[43]
Core-collapse supernova equations of state based on neutron star observations,
A. W. Steiner, M. Hempel, and T. Fischer, “Core-collapse supernova equations of state based on neutron star observations,”Astrophys. J.774(2013) 17, [1207.2184]
2013 arXiv
-
[44]
Symmetry Energy I: Semi-Infinite Matter,
P. Danielewicz and J. Lee, “Symmetry Energy I: Semi-Infinite Matter,”Nucl. Phys. A818(2009) 36–96, [0807.3743]
2009 arXiv
-
[45]
Unified treatment of subsaturation stellar matter at zero and finite temperature,
F. Gulminelli and A. R. Raduta, “Unified treatment of subsaturation stellar matter at zero and finite temperature,”Phys. Rev. C92(2015) 055803, [1504.04493]
2015 arXiv
-
[46]
A Skyrme parametrization from subnuclear to neutron star densities. 2. Nuclei far from stablities,
E. Chabanat, P. Bonche, P. Haensel, J. Meyer, and R. Schaeffer, “A Skyrme parametrization from subnuclear to neutron star densities. 2. Nuclei far from stablities,”Nucl. Phys. A635(1998) 231–256. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.A 643, 441–441 (1998)]
1998
-
[47]
Phase transitions and the mass radius curves of relativistic stars,
L. Lindblom, “Phase transitions and the mass radius curves of relativistic stars,”Phys. Rev. D58(1998) 024008, [gr-qc/9802072]
1998 arXiv
-
[48]
Cosmological evolution of a complex scalar field with repulsive or attractive self-interaction,
A. Su´ arez and P.-H. Chavanis, “Cosmological evolution of a complex scalar field with repulsive or attractive self-interaction,”Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 063515, [1608.08624]
2017 arXiv
-
[49]
Boson Stars: Gravitational Equilibria of Selfinteracting Scalar Fields,
M. Colpi, S. L. Shapiro, and I. Wasserman, “Boson Stars: Gravitational Equilibria of Selfinteracting Scalar Fields,”Phys. Rev. Lett.57(1986) 2485–2488
1986
-
[50]
Bose-Einstein Condensate general relativistic stars,
P.-H. Chavanis and T. Harko, “Bose-Einstein Condensate general relativistic stars,”Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 064011, [1108.3986]
2012 arXiv
-
[51]
Q-balls in polynomial potentials,
J. Heeck and M. Sokhashvili, “Q-balls in polynomial potentials,”Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 016006, [2211.00021]
2023 arXiv
-
[52]
Nontopological solitons,
T. D. Lee and Y. Pang, “Nontopological solitons,” Phys. Rept.221(1992) 251–350
1992
-
[53]
Q-balls,
S. R. Coleman, “Q-balls,”Nucl. Phys. B262no. 2, (1985) 263. [Addendum: Nucl.Phys.B 269, 744 (1986)]
1985
-
[54]
Understanding Q-Balls Beyond the Thin-Wall Limit,
J. Heeck, A. Rajaraman, R. Riley, and C. B. Verhaaren, “Understanding Q-Balls Beyond the Thin-Wall Limit,” Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 045008, [2009.08462]
2021 arXiv
-
[55]
Dark-matter induced neutron-antineutron oscillations,
T. Brugeat and C. Smith, “Dark-matter induced neutron-antineutron oscillations,”JHEP01(2025) 132, [2412.06434]
2025 arXiv
Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.