pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.22641 · v4 · pith:4LV3R6ERnew · submitted 2025-11-27 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Non-Gaussianity in SMICA

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 18:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords SMICAcomponent separationbispectrumnon-GaussianityCMB polarizationforegroundsLiteBIRDprimordial non-Gaussianity
0
0 comments X

The pith

A modified SMICA recovers the foreground bispectrum and standard primordial non-Gaussianity constraints from multi-frequency polarization maps.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends the SMICA component separation technique to incorporate information from the bispectrum of foreground emissions. It pairs this with a binned estimator that computes bispectra directly from maps across multiple frequency channels for several components at once. When applied to simulations of the LiteBIRD experiment featuring polarized dust and synchrotron, the method retrieves the expected three-point correlations of those foregrounds. It also produces the usual limits on primordial non-Gaussianity parameters within one consistent framework that accounts for both two-point and three-point statistics. This matters for future CMB experiments because it addresses foreground contamination at the stage of map cleaning rather than after.

Core claim

The central claim is that extending SMICA to use bispectrum information from multiple frequency channels allows simultaneous estimation of component bispectra, recovering the correct 3-point correlator of foregrounds like polarized dust and synchrotron as well as standard constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity.

What carries the argument

The extended SMICA formalism with a multi-frequency binned bispectrum estimator that jointly fits power spectra and bispectra to separate components and estimate their non-Gaussian statistics.

If this is right

  • The bispectrum does not improve the precision of power spectrum estimation or spectral parameters.
  • The approach recovers the correct 3-point correlator of the foregrounds.
  • Standard constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity are obtained in a coherent multi-frequency and multi-component framework.
  • Data is combined in an optimal way accounting for both the power spectrum and the bispectrum of the various components.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This joint approach could minimize biases from uncertain foreground bispectra in measurements of primordial non-Gaussianity.
  • Similar methods might apply to other higher-order statistics or to real data from upcoming experiments.
  • It highlights the value of moving non-Gaussianity analysis upstream into the separation process for experiments sensitive to polarization.

Load-bearing premise

The 400 E and B polarization simulations based on the LiteBIRD experiment accurately capture the statistical properties of polarized dust and synchrotron emission without unmodeled systematics.

What would settle it

Observing a mismatch between the recovered and input bispectrum when the method is applied to simulations that include additional unmodeled foreground effects or when run on actual observational data.

read the original abstract

We develop a new formalism for the component separation method Spectral Matching Independent Component Analysis (SMICA) in order to include the information contained in the foregrounds beyond second-order statistics. We also develop a binned bispectrum estimator that works directly using maps of different frequency channels, capable of determining the bispectrum of multiple components at the same time, shifting the traditional approach to non-Gaussianity estimation from a cleaned map to the component separation step, for a better handling of foreground uncertainty. We test our method on 400 E and B polarization simulations based on the LiteBIRD experiment, containing the two main sources of contamination for CMB polarization experiments: polarized dust and synchrotron emission. We show that the bispectrum does not improve the precision of the power spectrum estimation or of the spectral parameters. However, we are capable of recovering the correct 3-point correlator of the foregrounds and standard constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity in a coherent multi-frequency and multi-component framework. The advantage of our approach is that it combines data in an optimal way accounting for the power spectrum and the bispectrum of the various components, which is not true for the standard approach.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the SMICA component separation formalism to incorporate bispectrum information in addition to power spectra, enabling joint modeling of Gaussian and non-Gaussian foreground properties. It introduces a binned multi-frequency bispectrum estimator that operates directly on maps from different frequency channels to recover the bispectra of multiple components simultaneously. The method is tested on 400 E and B polarization simulations based on the LiteBIRD experiment that include polarized dust and synchrotron emission as the primary contaminants. Results show that the bispectrum does not improve the precision of power spectrum or spectral parameter estimation, but the approach recovers the input 3-point correlator of the foregrounds and yields standard constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity within a coherent multi-frequency and multi-component framework.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work offers a principled way to propagate foreground non-Gaussianity uncertainties into component separation rather than treating them after map cleaning. This could strengthen robustness of primordial non-Gaussianity constraints from future CMB polarization missions by optimally combining power-spectrum and bispectrum information across components and frequencies. The simulation-based external validation provides a concrete check on the estimator.

major comments (2)
  1. [Simulation tests and results] The central claim of recovering the correct 3-point correlator of the foregrounds (abstract) rests on the 400 LiteBIRD E/B simulations faithfully embedding the non-Gaussian statistical properties of polarized dust and synchrotron. The manuscript should provide explicit quantitative recovery metrics (bias, variance, and covariance with power-spectrum parameters) and tests for unmodeled systematics such as spatial variation in frequency scaling or additional higher-order contaminants; without these, any mismatch would bias the bispectrum recovery while leaving the power-spectrum results unaffected, as already noted in the text.
  2. [Formalism and estimator development] The binned multi-frequency bispectrum estimator is presented as shifting non-Gaussianity estimation into the component-separation step. The manuscript should clarify the explicit embedding of this estimator into the extended SMICA likelihood (including how the bispectrum parameters enter the joint fit and how their covariance with spectral indices is handled), as this is load-bearing for the claim of a coherent multi-component framework.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by including at least one quantitative figure of merit for the bispectrum recovery (e.g., recovered amplitude with uncertainty) rather than the high-level statement that the correct correlator is recovered.
  2. Notation for the multi-frequency bispectrum bins and the component separation parameters should be made fully consistent between the formalism section and the simulation results to avoid reader confusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and positive assessment of the potential impact of our work. We address each major comment below and indicate the corresponding revisions to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Simulation tests and results] The central claim of recovering the correct 3-point correlator of the foregrounds (abstract) rests on the 400 LiteBIRD E/B simulations faithfully embedding the non-Gaussian statistical properties of polarized dust and synchrotron. The manuscript should provide explicit quantitative recovery metrics (bias, variance, and covariance with power-spectrum parameters) and tests for unmodeled systematics such as spatial variation in frequency scaling or additional higher-order contaminants; without these, any mismatch would bias the bispectrum recovery while leaving the power-spectrum results unaffected, as already noted in the text.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative recovery metrics improve the robustness of the presentation. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection with tables that report the measured bias and variance on the recovered foreground bispectrum amplitudes together with the relevant covariance blocks between these amplitudes and the power-spectrum and spectral-index parameters. Regarding unmodeled systematics, our simulations adopt the standard assumption of spatially constant frequency scaling. We have expanded the discussion to include a simple analytic estimate of the bias that would arise from spatial variations and have noted this as a limitation to be explored with more realistic simulations in future work. These additions directly address the concern while preserving the scope of the present study. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Formalism and estimator development] The binned multi-frequency bispectrum estimator is presented as shifting non-Gaussianity estimation into the component-separation step. The manuscript should clarify the explicit embedding of this estimator into the extended SMICA likelihood (including how the bispectrum parameters enter the joint fit and how their covariance with spectral indices is handled), as this is load-bearing for the claim of a coherent multi-component framework.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. We have revised the formalism section to include explicit equations that show how the binned multi-frequency bispectrum estimator is folded into the extended SMICA likelihood. The joint likelihood is now written as the sum of the usual power-spectrum term and a bispectrum term; the amplitudes of the component bispectra appear as additional free parameters. We have also inserted the relevant off-diagonal blocks of the Fisher matrix (or covariance matrix) that quantify the coupling between spectral indices and bispectrum amplitudes. These changes make the coherent multi-component, multi-frequency framework fully explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: new SMICA formalism and bispectrum estimator validated on independent simulations

full rationale

The paper introduces a new formalism extending SMICA beyond second-order statistics and develops a binned multi-frequency bispectrum estimator. These are then tested for recovery of foreground 3-point correlators and primordial NG constraints using 400 LiteBIRD E/B polarization simulations containing dust and synchrotron. The simulations serve as an external check rather than reducing any claim to a fitted parameter or self-referential definition by construction. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results appear in the provided derivation chain; the central results remain independently verifiable through the simulation tests.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review limits visibility into explicit free parameters or axioms; the approach assumes foregrounds possess measurable bispectrum properties separable in frequency space.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Foreground emissions (dust, synchrotron) have non-Gaussian statistics that can be jointly modeled with power spectra in a multi-frequency framework.
    Invoked when extending SMICA to include bispectrum information and when claiming coherent recovery of 3-point correlators.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5737 in / 1331 out tokens · 47545 ms · 2026-05-21T18:44:18.632535+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · 42 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Multi-Detector Multi-Component spectral matching and applications for CMB data analysis

    J. Delabrouille, J.-F. Cardoso, and G. Patanchon,Multidetector multicomponent spectral matching and applications for cosmic microwave background data analysis, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, arXiv:astro-ph/0211504

  2. [2]

    Component separation with flexible models. Application to the separation of astrophysical emissions

    J.-F. Cardoso, M. Martin, J. Delabrouille, M. Betoule and G. Patanchon,Component separation with flexible models. Application to the separation of astrophysical emissions, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, arXiv:0803.1814

  3. [3]

    Leloup, J

    C. Leloup, J. Errard and R. Stompor,Nonparametric maximum likelihood component separation for CMB polarization data, Physical Review D, arXiv:2308.03412

  4. [4]

    Morshed, A

    M. Morshed, A. Rizzieri, C. Leloup, J. Errard, Josquin and R. Stompor,Pixel domain implementation of the minimally informed CMB map foreground cleaning method, Physical Review D, arXiv:2405.18365

  5. [5]

    Rizzieri, C

    A. Rizzieri, C. Leloup, J. Errard and D. Poletti,Cleaning Galactic foregrounds with spatially varying spectral dependence from CMB observations withfgbuster, arXiv:2510.08534

  6. [6]

    Carones, M

    A. Carones, M. Migliaccio, G. Puglisi, C. Baccigalupi, D. Marinucci, N. Vittorio and D. Poletti, Multiclustering needlet ILC for CMB B-mode component separation, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, arXiv:2212.04456 – 30 –

  7. [7]

    Vacher, A

    L. Vacher, A. Carones, J. Aumont, J. Chluba, N. Krachmalnicoff, C. Ranucci, M. Remazeilles, A. Rizzieri,How bad could it be? Modelling the 3D complexity of the polarised dust signal using moment expansion, Astronomy & Astrophysics, arXiv:2411.11649

  8. [8]

    Marinucci and G

    D. Marinucci and G. Peccati,Random Fields on the Sphere Representation, Limit Theorems and Cosmological Applications, Cambridge University Press (2011), https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511751677

  9. [9]

    Isotropic Gaussian random fields on the sphere: Regularity, fast simulation and stochastic partial differential equations

    A. Lang and C. Schwab,Isotropic Gaussian random fields on the sphere: Regularity, fast simulation and stochastic partial differential equations, Annals of Applied Probability, arXiv:1305.1170

  10. [10]

    D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev, V . K. Khersonskii,Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum, World Scientific Publishing Company, 1988,https://doi.org/10.1142/0270

  11. [11]

    O. H. E. Philcox,Searching for Inflationary Physics with the CMB Trispectrum: 1. Primordial Theory &Optimal Estimators, Physical Review D , arXiv:2502.04434

  12. [12]

    Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck

    Planck Collaboration,Planck2018 results: VI. Cosmological parameters, Astronomy & Astrophysics, arXiv:1807.06205

  13. [13]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Planck Collaboration,Planck2018 results: I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck, Astronomy & Astrophysics, arXiv:1807.06209

  14. [14]

    Planck Collaboration,Planck2013 results. XXIV . Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity, Astronomy & Astrophysics, arXiv:1303.5084

  15. [15]

    Planck 2015 results. XVII. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity

    Planck Collaboration,Planck2015 results: XVII. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity, Astronomy & Astrophysics, arXiv:1502.01592

  16. [16]

    Planck Collaboration,Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity, Astronomy & Astrophysics, arXiv:1905.05697

  17. [17]

    G. Jung, M. Citran, B. van Tent, L. Dumilly and N. Aghanim,Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity from Planck PR4 data, Astronomy & Astrophysics, arXiv:2504.00884

  18. [18]

    LiteBIRD collaboration,LiteBIRD Science Goals and Forecasts: Improved full-sky reconstruction of the gravitational lensing potential through the combination of Planck and LiteBIRD data, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, arXiv:2507.22618

  19. [19]

    CMB foregrounds - A brief review

    C. Dickinson,CMB foregrounds - A brief review, arXiv:1606.03606

  20. [20]

    G. Jung, B. Racine and B. van Tent,The bispectra of galactic CMB foregrounds and their impact on primordial non-Gaussianity estimation, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, arXiv:1810.01727

  21. [21]

    Coulton and D

    W. Coulton and D. N. Spergel,The bispectrum of polarized galactic foregrounds, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, arXiv:1901.04515

  22. [22]

    C. J. Hill,Foreground biases on primordial non-Gaussianity measurements from the CMB temperature bispectrum: Implications forPlanckand beyond, Physical Review D, arXiv:1807.07324

  23. [23]

    Abril-Cabezas, C

    I. Abril-Cabezas, C. Hervías-Caimapo, S. von Hausegger, B. D. Sherwin and D. Alonso,Impact of Galactic dust non-Gaussianity on searches for B-modes from inflation, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, arXiv:2309.09978

  24. [24]

    Abril-Cabezas, F

    I. Abril-Cabezas, F. J. Qu, B. D. Sherwin, A. van Engelen, N. MacCrann, C. Hervías-Caimapo, O. Darwish, C. J. Hill, M. S. Madhavacheril and N. Sehgal,Impact of Galactic non-gaussian foregrounds on CMB lensing measurements, Physical Review D, arXiv:2505.03737

  25. [25]

    Doohan, M

    M. Doohan, M. Millea, S. Raghunathan, F. Ge, L. Knox, K. Prabhu, C. L. Reichardt and W. L. K. WuQuantifying Bias due to non-gaussian Foregrounds in an Optimal Reconstruction of CMB Lensing and Temperature Power Spectra, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, arXiv:2502.20801 – 31 –

  26. [26]

    Weakly Non-Linear Gaussian Fluctuations and the Edgeworth Expansion

    R. Juszkiewicz, D. H. Weinberg, P. Amsterfamski, M. Chodorowski and F. Bouchet,Weakly Non-Linear Gaussian Fluctuations and the Edgeworth Expansion, The Astrophysical Journal, arXiv:astro-ph/9308012

  27. [27]

    Amendola,non-gaussian likelihood function and COBE data, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society,https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/283.3.983

    L. Amendola,non-gaussian likelihood function and COBE data, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society,https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/283.3.983

  28. [28]

    Parameter information from nonlinear cosmological fields

    A. Taylor and P. Watts,Parameter information from non-linear cosmological fields, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, arXiv:astro-ph/0010014

  29. [29]

    An Estimator for statistical anisotropy from the CMB bispectrum

    N. Bartolo, E. Dimastrogiovanni,M. Liguori, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto,An estimator for statistical anisotropy from the CMB bispectrum, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, arXiv:1107.4304

  30. [30]

    Hall and A

    A. Hall and A. Taylor,non-gaussian likelihood of weak lensing power spectra, Physical Review D, arXiv:2202.04095

  31. [31]

    How to make maps from CMB data without losing information

    M. Tegmark,How to Make Maps from Cosmic Microwave Background Data without Losing Information, The Astrophysical Journal, arXiv:astro-ph/9611130

  32. [32]

    Detecting Bispectral Acoustic Oscillations from Inflation Using a New Flexible Estimator

    M. Bucher, B. van Tent and C. S. Carvalho,Detecting bispectral acoustic oscillations from inflation using a new flexible estimator: Detecting bispectral acoustic oscillations from inflation using a new flexible estimator, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, arXiv:0911.1642

  33. [33]

    The binned bispectrum estimator: template-based and non-parametric CMB non-Gaussianity searches

    M. Bucher, B. Racine and B. van Tent,The binned bispectrum estimator: template-based and non-parametric CMB non-Gaussianity searches, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, arXiv:1509.08107

  34. [34]

    J. R. Fergusson, M. Liguori and E. P. S. Shellard,General CMB and Primordial Bispectrum Estimation I: Mode Expansion, Map-Making and Measures of f NL, Physical Review D, arXiv:0912.5516

  35. [35]

    J. R. Fergusson, M. Liguori and E. P. S. Shellard,The CMB bispectrum, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, arXiv:1006.1642

  36. [36]

    J. R. Fergusson,Efficient optimal non-gaussian CMB estimators with polarization, Physical Review D, arXiv:1403.7949

  37. [37]

    Borrill, S

    The Pan-Experiment Galactic Science Group, J. Borrill, S. E. Clark, J. Delabrouille, A. V . Frolov, S. Ghosh, B. S. Hensley, M. D. Hicks, N. Krachmalnicoff, K. Lau, M. M. Norton, C. Pryke, G. Puglisi, M. Remazeilles, E. Russier, B. Thorne, J. Yao, and A. ZoncaFull-sky Models of Galactic Microwave Emission and Polarization at Subarcminute Scales for the Py...

  38. [38]

    Zonca, B

    A. Zonca, B. Thorne, N. Krachmalnicoffand J. Borrill,The Python Sky Model 3 software, Journal of Open Source Software, arXiv:2108.01444

  39. [39]

    The Python Sky Model: software for simulating the Galactic microwave sky

    B. Thorne, J. Dunkley, D. Alonso, and S. Næss,The Python Sky Model: software for simulating the Galactic microwave sky, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, arXiv:1608.02841

  40. [40]

    The Three--Point Correlation Function of the Cosmic Microwave Background in Inflationary Models

    A. Gangui, F. Lucchin, S. Matarrese, and S. Mollerach,The Three point correlation function of the cosmic microwave background in inflationary models, The Astrophysics Journal, arXiv:astro-ph/9312033

  41. [41]

    Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models

    J. Maldacena,non-gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models, Journal of High Energy Physics, arXiv:astro-ph/0210603

  42. [42]

    Non-Gaussianities in two-field inflation

    F. Vernizzi and D. Wands,Non-Gaussianities in two-field inflation, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, arXiv:astro-ph/0603799

  43. [43]

    G. I. Rigopoulos, E. P. S. Shellard and B. van Tent,Quantitative bispectra from multifield inflation, Physical Review D, arXiv:astro-ph/0511041

  44. [44]

    C. T. Byrnes and K. Y . Choi,Review of Local Non-Gaussianity from Multifield Inflation, Advances in Astronomy,arXiv:1002.3110 – 32 –

  45. [45]

    Non-Gaussianity in two-field inflation beyond the slow-roll approximation

    G. Jung and B. van Tent,Non-Gaussianity in two-field inflation beyond the slow-roll approximation, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, arXiv:1611.09233

  46. [46]

    The next non-Gaussianity frontier: what can a measurement with $\sigma(f_{\rm NL}) \lesssim 1$ tell us about multifield inflation?

    R. de Putter, J. Gleyzes and O. Doré,Next non-Gaussianity frontier: What can a measurement with σ(f NL)tell us about multifield inflation?, Physical Review D, arXiv:1612.05248

  47. [47]

    D.-G. Wang, G. L. Pimentel, and A. Achúcarro,Bootstrapping multi-field inflation: non-Gaussianities from light scalars revisited, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, arXiv:2212.14035

  48. [48]

    Thorne, L

    B. Thorne, L. Knox and K. Prabhu,A generative model of galactic dust emission using variational autoencoders, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, arXiv:2101.11181

  49. [49]

    Parente,Modeling Dust in Galaxy Evolution Simulations, arXiv:2504.10585

    M. Parente,Modeling Dust in Galaxy Evolution Simulations, arXiv:2504.10585

  50. [50]

    Simulating polarized Galactic synchrotron emission at all frequencies, the Hammurabi code

    A. Waelkens, T. Jaffe, M. Reinecke, F.S. Kitaura and T. A. Enßlin,Simulating polarized Galactic synchrotron emission at all frequencies: The Hammurabi code, Astronomy & Astrophysics, arXiv:0807.2262

  51. [51]

    Simulations of Galactic polarized synchrotron emission for Epoch of Reionization observations

    M. Spinelli, G. Bernardi and M. G. Santos,Simulations of Galactic polarized synchrotron emission for Epoch of Reionization observations, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, arXiv:1802.03060

  52. [52]

    K. Diao, Z. Li, R. D. P. Grumitt and Y . Mao,synax: A Differentiable and GPU-accelerated Synchrotron Simulation Package, The Astrophysical Journal, arXiv:2410.01136

  53. [53]

    Primordial non-gaussianities in single field inflation

    D. Seery and J. E. Lidsey,Primordial non-Gaussianities in single-field inflation, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, arXiv:astro-ph/0503692

  54. [54]

    Observational Signatures and Non-Gaussianities of General Single Field Inflation

    X. Chen, M.-X. Huang, S. Kachru and G. Shiu,Observational signatures and non-Gaussianities of general single-field inflation, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, arXiv:hep-th/0605045

  55. [55]

    Large non-Gaussianities in the Effective Field Theory Approach to Single-Field Inflation: the Bispectrum

    N. Bartolo, M. Fasiello, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto,Large non-Gaussianities in the effective field theory approach to single-field inflation: the bispectrum, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, arXiv:1004.0893

  56. [56]

    Limits on non-Gaussianities from WMAP data

    P. Creminelli, A. Nicolis, L. Senatore, M. Tegmark, and M. Zaldarriaga,Limits on non-Gaussianities from WMAP data, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, arXiv:astro-ph/0509029

  57. [57]

    Non-Gaussianities in Single Field Inflation and their Optimal Limits from the WMAP 5-year Data

    L. Senatore, K. M. Smith, and M. Zaldarriaga,Non-Gaussianities in Single Field Inflation and their Optimal Limits from the WMAP 5-year Data, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, arXiv:0905.3746

  58. [58]

    W. Sohn, J. R. Fergusson, James R. and E. P. S. Shellard,High-resolution CMB bispectrum estimator with flexible modal bases, Physical Review D, arXiv:2305.14646

  59. [59]

    Acoustic Signatures in the Primary Microwave Background Bispectrum

    E. Komatsu and D. N. Spergel,Acoustic signatures in the primary microwave background bispectrum, Physical Review D, arXiv:astro-ph/0005036

  60. [60]

    Measuring primordial non-Gaussianity in the cosmic microwave background

    E. Komatsu, D.N. Spergel and B.D. Wandelt,Measuring Primordial Non-Gaussianity in the Cosmic Microwave Background, The Astrophysical Journal, arXiv:astro-ph/0305189

  61. [61]

    A. P. S. Yadav, E. Komatsu and B. D. Wandelt,Fast Estimator of Primordial Non-Gaussianity from Temperature and Polarization Anisotropies in the Cosmic Microwave Background, The Astrophysical Journal, arXiv:astro-ph/0701921

  62. [62]

    A. P. S. Yadav, E. Komatsu, B. D. Wandelt, M. Liguori, F. K. Hansen and S. Matarrese,Fast Estimator of Primordial Non-Gaussianity from Temperature and Polarization Anisotropies in the Cosmic Microwave Background. II. Partial Sky Coverage and Inhomogeneous Noise, The Astrophysical Journal, arXiv:0711.4933

  63. [63]

    Euclid Collaboration,Euclid Definition Study Report, ESA/SRE(2011)12, arXiv:1110.3193

  64. [64]

    SPHEREx Collaboration,SPHEREx: NASA’s near-infrared spectrophotometric all-sky survey, Proceedings SPIE, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2020: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, arXiv:2404.11017 – 33 –

  65. [65]

    Rubin Observatory Collaboration,Rubin Observatory Plans for an Early Science Program, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11110648

  66. [66]

    Simons Observatory Collaboration ,The Simons Observatory: science goals and forecasts, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, arXiv:1808.07445

  67. [67]

    2019, Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1298, 10.21105/joss.01298

    A. Zonca, L. P. Singer, D. Lenz, M. Reinecke, C. Rosset, E. Hivon and K. M. GórskiHealpy: equal area pixelization and spherical harmonics transforms for data on the sphere in Python, Journal of Open Source Software, DOI:10.21105/joss.01298

  68. [68]

    K. M. Gorski, E. Hivon, A. J. Banday, B. D. Wandelt, F. K. Hansen, M. Reinecke, M. and M. Bartelmann,HEALPix: A Framework for High-Resolution Discretization and Fast Analysis of Data Distributed on the Sphere, The Astrophysical Journal, arXiv:astro-ph/0409513 – 34 –