Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 90 references

Blacklegged tick persistence reduces to the ratio Rd = rS/K exceeding 1, with a unique positive equilibrium when the ratio is above that threshold.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 05:37 UTC pith:4LZYWMJL

load-bearing objection Solid applied math paper: the reader's claimed concavity flaw in the uniqueness proof doesn't survive re-derivation, but the parameterization leans heavily on calibration and should be read as illustrative, not predictive.

arxiv 2607.13280 v1 pith:4LZYWMJL submitted 2026-07-14 math.DS

Modeling the Influence of Questing Behavior and Host Availability on Tick Population Dynamics

Carli Peterson , Erika Gallo , Christopher Kribs This is my paper
classification math.DS MSC 39A2839A3092D25
keywords Ixodes scapularisdifference equationsratio-dependent host attachmentquesting behaviordemographic reproductive numberbifurcation analysisstage-structured population modelLyme disease
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper builds a stage-structured, discrete-time model of the blacklegged tick in which host attachment is ratio-dependent: feeding success rises with host abundance relative to tick density and saturates when ticks crowd out host encounters. Its central claim is that the model has a unique positive equilibrium exactly when the demographic reproductive number Rd = rS/K exceeds 1, where r is adult fecundity, S is the product of the three environmental survival probabilities, and K is the tick-to-host ratio at half-maximal larval reproduction. At Rd = 1, a transcritical bifurcation exchanges stability between the extinction state and the positive equilibrium while a period-doubling bifurcation produces an unstable 2-cycle, so the natural two-year cohort alternation never stabilizes on its own. The paper parameterizes the model for the northeastern and southeastern United States and shows that questing behavior, the fraction of time spent above the leaf litter, monotonically increases equilibrium abundance, with southern ticks persisting at low questing heights because litter-dwelling lizards are abundant, while northern populations overtake southern ones once above-litter questing is common. A sympathetic reader would care because the same threshold organizes every version of the model, and because the ratio-dependent terms cap population growth, correcting the overestimates that constant-feeding models produce.

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is a threshold identity. For the full ratio-dependent system, a strictly positive equilibrium exists if and only if Rd = rS/K > 1, with S = sL sN sA/2; the same condition governs the simplified models with constant or universal feeding success. At the threshold the Jacobian's eigenvalues are +1 and -1 simultaneously, giving a transcritical exchange of stability between the extinction and positive equilibria and a period-doubling bifurcation that creates a 2-cycle. Numerically, that 2-cycle is always unstable, so the model settles to a stable equilibrium rather than sustained oscillations. The ratio-dependent attachment functions do not change the threshold but d

What carries the argument

The central object is the demographic reproductive number Rd = rS/K, with S = sL sN sA/2, together with the three ratio-dependent feeding functions Sj(t) = 1 - exp(-zj Sj / Tj), where Tj is the relevant tick density and Sj is the host-availability sum for stage j. These functions convert host-to-tick ratios into per-capita feeding probabilities; the larval update also includes the saturating reproduction term B(t) = (rA/2)/(A/(2H6)+K). The analysis reduces the three-stage system to the larval-adult subsystem and then to the scalar map A = f3(f2(f1(A))); its slope at zero equals Rd, so a positive fixed point exists exactly when that slope exceeds one. The bifurcation pair at Rd = 1 is read of

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise, and the least-supported part of the argument, is the Appendix B.4 assertion that the feeding-success maps f_i are increasing and concave on (0, infinity), used to guarantee at most one positive fixed point; the paper states this without proof, and although the assertion is true for each f_i, the proof as written does not establish it.

What would settle it

Numerically count the positive roots of A = f3(f2(f1(A))) using the paper's parameter tables; the theorem predicts exactly one root whenever Rd > 1, so finding two positive roots would refute the uniqueness claim. A cheaper check is to verify the numerical bifurcation at Rd = 1: if the positive equilibrium appears below Rd = 1 or fails to appear above it, the threshold claim is wrong.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Constant or universal feeding-success assumptions overestimate tick abundance; the ratio-dependent model's equilibrium densities saturate rather than rising linearly with Rd.
  • The Rd = 1 extinction threshold is robust to the feeding-success assumption, so the demographic reproductive value remains the primary determinant of persistence even with host-tick feedback.
  • Ratio-dependent attachment alone cannot stabilize the 2-cycle; the synchronous single-cohort oscillation remains unstable, so the model's long-term behavior is a fixed point.
  • Questing behavior c increases equilibrium abundance in both regions; at baseline parameters the model reproduces the observed lower southern densities while predicting that southern populations would exceed northern ones over most of the range c < 0.62.
  • Because infection dynamics operate on top of demography, questing behavior and ratio-dependent attachment are likely to shape tick infection prevalence and the density of infected ticks relevant to human Lyme disease risk.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The Appendix B.4 proof asserts, without showing the derivative, that each f_i is increasing and concave; the assertion is verifiable, for f2(x) = sN(1 - e^{-a/x})x the second derivative is -a^2 e^{-a/x}/x^3, strictly negative, but the paper leaves that verification to the reader.
  • Appendix B.3's written Jury criterion, '|tr(J)| < |det(J)| + 1 < 2', is misstated; the correct two-dimensional condition is |tr J| < 1 + det J < 2. The subsequent inequality in the text applies the correct form, so this appears to be a notation error rather than a failed proof.
  • A testable extension: the model treats c as independent of survival, but the discussion notes that above-litter questing likely raises desiccation risk; coupling c to the survival terms could turn the monotone c-response into a hump-shaped curve, especially in warm southern climates.
  • The model assumes no overlap between larval and nymphal questing; the discussion flags that southern populations show more overlap, which introduces inter-stage competition and, in standard stage-structured theory, can produce synchronous oscillations, so the fixed-point conclusion may be specific to the sequential timeline.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops a discrete-time, stage-structured model for Ixodes scapularis dynamics that couples tick life stages to six host groups through ratio-dependent host-attachment functions, and it parameterizes the model separately for northeastern and southeastern U.S. ecosystems. The main analytical claim is that the reduced LA subsystem has a unique positive fixed point if and only if Rd = rS/K > 1, where S = sLsNsA/2, and that this threshold is marked by a +1/-1 bifurcation pair producing a stable positive equilibrium and an unstable 2-cycle. The paper then compares this full model with baseline models having constant or universal feeding success, and uses numerical bifurcation analysis in Rd and the questing parameter c to argue that ratio dependence mainly saturates population size while questing behavior controls host encounter composition and regional abundance.

Significance. If the analytical results are correct, the paper gives a clean threshold condition for persistence in a biologically detailed tick-host model and shows that the qualitative dynamics are robust under three feeding-success formulations. The strengths are the transparent event-sequenced construction, the explicit and mostly self-contained appendices, the analytical treatment of the baseline and full systems, the detailed parameter tables and host-density data for two regions, and concrete comparative predictions about questing behavior and tick abundance. The main significance is as a framework for tick population modeling and for guiding future transmission models, rather than as an empirically validated prediction, since several parameters are calibrated rather than estimated independently.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Appendix B.4] The proof states without derivation that each fi is increasing and concave. This is true, but the calculation should be given: for f2(x)=sN x(1-e^{-a/x}), f2''(x)=-sN a^2 e^{-a/x}/x^3 < 0, with a=zNΣN; f3 is identical in form; f1 is the composition of the concave increasing Monod function B(A) and the concave increasing function h(B)=sL B(1-e^{-p/B}), and the composition is concave because h''(B)B'(A)^2 + h'(B)B''(A) < 0. Adding these one or two lines would make the central proof easier to verify.
  2. [Appendix B.3] The Jury criterion is typeset incorrectly as "tr |(J)| < det |(J)| + 1 < 2". It should be |tr(J)| < 1 + det(J) < 2. Also, when stating that the compound inequality holds, the authors should explicitly identify det(J) for the given Jacobian, namely det(J) = -[K/(A∞/2H6∞+K)](1+f(xL))(1+f(xN))(1+f(xA)), so the reader can see which factors are being bounded.
  3. [Section 4.1, Tables 3 and 4] In both parameter tables the recruitment labels are shifted after host group 3: "Λ3 Recruitment of shrews" is followed by a second "Λ3 Recruitment of squirrels", then "Λ4 Recruitment of lizards" and "Λ5 Recruitment of deer"; these should be Λ4, Λ5, and Λ6, respectively. The unit for ˆb6,A is also given as "nymphs/deer" in Table 3 and should be "adults/deer".
  4. [Section 4.1] The statement that K = 5 adult ticks/deer was "selected" so that Rd > 1 should be more explicit about the status of K. Since K is part of the bifurcation parameter Rd, this is a calibration choice rather than an independently estimated value. A brief sensitivity discussion, or at least a statement that the qualitative conclusions are unchanged for a range of K, would strengthen the interpretation of Figures 3 and 5.
  5. [Section 4.4 / Figure 5] The caption lists subfigures (e) and (f), but the figure contains only subfigures (a)-(d). Either the caption is incomplete or duplicate panels were removed; this should be fixed.
  6. [Appendix B.5] The notation SL2∞, SN2∞, SA2∞ is defined but not introduced in a table or before first use. A sentence explaining that the subscript 2 refers to the second-generation evaluation at the alternate phase of the 2-cycle would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the central threshold theorem is a derived mathematical result, and fitted parameters are explicitly inputs, not predictions.

full rationale

The paper's central analytical claim—Theorem Appendix B.1, that the full model has a unique positive fixed point iff Rd = rS/K > 1—is derived from the model equations themselves. The proof defines f1, f2, f3, composes them into G(A), and computes G'(0) = f3'(0)f2'(0)f1'(0) = (sA)(sN)(rsL/(2K)) = rS/K by the chain rule. This is a mathematical derivation, not a fit or a definitional restatement of Rd. The concavity assertions used in the uniqueness argument are correct for the stated functions, so the theorem is not circularly depending on an unproved ansatz. The selection of K = 5 adult ticks/deer is explicitly a parameter choice made so that the computed Rd>1 for the numerical simulations; it is not an attempt to derive the theorem from the fitted value, and the 'if and only if' statement holds for arbitrary parameter values. Likewise, the calibration constants zj are estimated from stated survival data and are model inputs, not quantities the paper claims to predict. The bifurcation pair at Rd=1 and the instability of the 2-cycle are established analytically for the simplified model and numerically for the full model; they are not encoded in the parameter fitting. Self-citations such as [24] supply empirical data and prior modeling context, but the central stability and existence results do not reduce to those citations. No step in the derivation chain exhibits the pattern of a fitted parameter being renamed as a prediction, an ansatz being imported solely through self-citation, or a uniqueness claim being forced by definition. Therefore the paper does not contain significant circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model's novel biology enters through ratio-dependent attachment and the questing parameter c, but K and zj are fitted to make the desired persistence threshold hold, and several southern host-preference values are arbitrarily scaled from northern data. The host dynamics are simple linear equations; the tick–host interaction includes no new entities beyond these fitted functional forms.

free parameters (7)
  • K (saturation constant for adult tick-to-host ratio) = 5 adult ticks/deer
    Selected after estimating r and S specifically so that Rd=rS/K>1; the persistence threshold depends on this chosen value.
  • zL, zN, zA (host-finding calibration constants, north) = 1.15, 1.26, 2.15
    Calibrated so that sjSj(t) reproduces assumed overall survival probabilities 0.1, 0.1, 0.3.
  • zL, zN, zA (host-finding calibration constants, south) = 1.25, 2.81, 2.23
    Same calibration procedure as north, using southern host communities.
  • Southern larval/nymphal preference reduction factor = 0.1 (10%)
    When body-burden data were unavailable, southern preferences were estimated by reducing northern burdens to 10%; this is ad hoc and directly affects the south parameterization.
  • μi (host mortality proportions) = Values in Tables 3–4
    Derived from fixed-point equations using assumed baseline host densities and recruitment rates, so they are calibrated to match chosen equilibria.
  • c (proportion of questing season above leaf litter) = North 0.18, South 0.02
    Taken from nymph field observations and assumed to apply to larvae; not fitted to model output but an unvalidated transfer.
  • Seasonal preference scaling factors = 10 (weeks), 2, 1.5, 1 (feeding durations)
    Ad hoc multiplicative factors used to convert field burden data into seasonal preferences (Appendix C).
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Host populations are assumed to be at their fixed points before analyzing tick dynamics.
    Section 3 states that each host equation converges to a fixed point and the remaining analysis considers host populations at those values.
  • domain assumption Nymphs feed in spring, larvae in summer, adults in fall with no overlap.
    Listed in Section 2.1 and used to construct the seven-event annual timeline.
  • domain assumption Larvae and nymphs feed on all host groups, adults only on host group 6.
    Assumption 2 in Section 2.1; this determines the structure of ΣL, ΣN, and ΣA.
  • domain assumption Questing behavior of adults does not vary north-to-south.
    Assumption in Section 2.2.2, cited to [27,18]; c is applied only to larvae and nymphs.
  • ad hoc to paper Host-finding success has the specific saturating form S_j = 1 − exp(−z_j Σ_j / density).
    This functional form is chosen rather than derived; it encodes ratio dependence but is not independently validated.
  • domain assumption Birds are excluded from the host community.
    Section 2.1 states avian hosts were excluded due to limited density estimates and assumed small contribution to tick demography.
  • domain assumption Host recruitment Λ_i is constant.
    Used in the host equations of Model (2.1); simplifies host dynamics to linear difference equations.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 202 in / 11240 out tokens · 142174 ms · 2026-08-02T05:37:43.901547+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Ixodes scapularis, the blacklegged tick, vectors several human pathogens, making understanding its population dynamics essential to assessing and predicting disease risk. Tick demography depends on a sequence of biological events, including reproduction, off-host survival, and successful host attachment for blood feeding, each of which is influenced by host community and questing behavior. In this paper, we developed a stage-structured nonlinear system of difference equations that incorporates this sequence of events through ratio-dependent host-attachment, allowing the model to retain biological detail while remaining assessable by classical discrete-time analysis techniques. The model was parameterized to represent general northeastern and southeastern ecosystems in the United States, where host community composition and questing behavior differ. Analytical and numerical bifurcation analysis shows that the system exhibits a $+1$/$-1$ bifurcation pair as the demographic reproductive number increases, which gives rise to a stable positive existence fixed point and an unstable 2-cycle. Ratio-dependent feeding success limits population sizes by restricting successful feeding. Questing behavior determines both the frequency and composition of host encounters, further influencing successful feeding. These results demonstrate that long-term tick population outcomes are governed by the balance between cohort advancement and host-attachment opportunities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.13280 by Carli Peterson, Christopher Kribs, Erika Gallo.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Three-dimensional bifurcation diagram for Model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Bifurcation diagrams for Model (2.1) of the larval and adult populations with respect to the demographic reproductive value Rd using the northern parameter set from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Fixed-point dynamics of the larval and adult popul [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Bifurcation diagrams for larval and adult populat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. J. Eisen, K. J. Kugeler, L. Eisen, C. B. Beard, C. D. Padd ock, Tick-borne zoonoses in the United States: persistent and emerging threats to hum an health, ILAR Jour- nal 58 (3) (2017) 319–335. doi:10.1016/j.pt.2017.12.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pt.2017.12.006 2017

  2. [2]

    R. J. Eisen, L. Eisen, The blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis : an increas- ing public health concern, Trends in Parasitology 34 (4) (20 18) 295–309. doi:10.1093/ilar/ilx005

    work page doi:10.1093/ilar/ilx005

  3. [3]

    K. J. Kugeler, A. Earley, P. S. Mead, A. F. Hinckley, Surve illance for Lyme disease after implementation of a revised case definition — U nited States, 2022, MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 73 (2024) 118–123. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7306a1

    work page doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7306a1 2022

  4. [4]

    D. Fish, R. C. Dowler, Host associations of ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) parasitizing medium-sized mammals in a Lyme disease endemic area of south ern New York, Jour- nal of Medical Entomology 26 (3) (1989) 200–209. doi:10.1093/jmedent/26.3.200. 28

    work page doi:10.1093/jmedent/26.3.200 1989

  5. [5]

    J. E. Keirans, H. J. Hutcheson, L. A. Durden, J. Klompen, Ixodes (Ixodes) scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae): redescription of all active stages, dis tribution, hosts, geographical variation, and medical and veterinary importance, Journal of Medical Entomology 33 (3) (1996) 297–318. doi:10.1093/jmedent/33.3.297

    work page doi:10.1093/jmedent/33.3.297 1996

  6. [6]

    T. J. Opalka, A two-year temporal and spatial investigat ion of questing ticks in Marquette County, Michigan, Master’s thesis, Northern Mic higan University (2011)

    2011

  7. [7]

    R. C. Falco, D. Fish, Horizontal movement of adult Ixodes dammini (Acari: Ixodi- dae) attracted to CO2-baited traps, Journal of Medical Ento mology 28 (5) (1991) 726–729. doi:10.1093/jmedent/28.5.726

    work page doi:10.1093/jmedent/28.5.726 1991

  8. [8]

    Oorebeek, R

    M. Oorebeek, R. Sharrad, S. Kleindorfer, What attracts l arval Ixodes hirsti (Acari: Ixodidae) to their host?, Parasitology Research 10 4 (3) (2009) 623–628. doi:10.1007/s00436-008-1238-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00436-008-1238-3 2009

  9. [9]

    Vassallo, C

    M. Vassallo, C. Perez-Eid, Comparative behavior of diffe rent life-cycle stages of Ixodes ricinus (Acari: Ixodidae) to human-produced stimuli, Journal of Me dical Entomology 39 (1) (2002) 234–236. doi:10.1603/0022-2585-39.1.234

    work page doi:10.1603/0022-2585-39.1.234 2002

  10. [10]

    H. S. Ginsberg, E. L. Rulison, J. L. Miller, G. Pang, I. M. Arsnoe, G. J. Hickling, N. H. Ogden, R. A. LeBrun, J. I. Tsao, Local abundan ce of Ixodes scapularis in forests: effects of environmental moisture, vegetation c haracteris- tics, and host abundance, Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases 11 ( 1) (2020) 101271. doi:10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.101271

    arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Ogden, M

    N. Ogden, M. Bigras-Poulin, C. O’callaghan, I. Barker, L. Lindsay, A. Maarouf, K. Smoyer-Tomic, D. Waltner-Toews, D. Charron, A dynamic po pulation model to investigate effects of climate on geographic range and sea sonality of the tick Ixodes scapularis , International Journal for Parasitology 35 (4) (2005) 375– 389. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.12.013

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.12.013 2005

  12. [12]

    Mount, D

    G. Mount, D. Haile, E. Daniels, Simulation of blacklegg ed tick (Acari: Ixodidae) population dynamics and transmission of Borrelia burgdorferi, Journal of Medical Entomology 34 (4) (1997) 461–484. doi:10.1093/jmedent/34.4.461

    work page doi:10.1093/jmedent/34.4.461 1997

  13. [13]

    Levin, D

    M. Levin, D. Fish, Density-dependent factors regulati ng feeding success of Ixodes scapularis larvae (Acari: Ixodidae), The Journal of Parasitology 81 (1 ) (1998) 36–

    1998

  14. [14]

    S. G. Vail, G. Smith, Density-dependent seasonal dynam ics of blacklegged tick (Acari: Ixodidae) nymphs, Journal of Medical Entomology 34 (3) (1997) 301–306. doi:10.1093/jmedent/34.3.301

    work page doi:10.1093/jmedent/34.3.301 1997

  15. [15]

    H. S. Ginsberg, M. Albert, L. Acevedo, M. C. Dyer, I. M. Ar snoe, J. I. Tsao, T. N. Mather, R. A. LeBrun, Environmental factors affecting s urvival of im- mature Ixodes scapularis and implications for geographical distribution of Lyme disease: the climate/behavior hypothesis, PLOS One 12 (1) ( 2017) e0168723. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0168723

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0168723 2017

  16. [16]

    Arsnoe, J

    I. Arsnoe, J. I. Tsao, G. J. Hickling, Nymphal Ixodes scapularis questing behavior explains geographic variation in Lyme borreliosi s risk in the east- ern United States, Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases 10 (3) (201 9) 553–563. doi:10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.01.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.01.001 2019

  17. [17]

    R. S. Ostfeld, F. Keesing, Biodiversity and disease ris k: the case of Lyme disease, Conservation biology 14 (3) (2000) 722 –728. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99014.x. 29

    arXiv 2000

  18. [18]

    H. S. Ginsberg, G. J. Hickling, R. L. Burke, N. H. Ogden, L . Beati, R. A. Le- Brun, I. M. Arsnoe, R. Gerhold, S. Han, K. Jackson, et al., Why Lyme disease is common in the northern US, but rare in the south: The roles o f host choice, host-seeking behavior, and tick density, PLoS Biology 19 (1 ) (2021) e3001066. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001066

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001066 2021

  19. [19]

    A. G. Gatewood, K. A. Liebman, G. Vourc’h, J. Bunikis, S. A. Hamer, R. Cortinas, F. Melton, P. Cislo, U. Kitron, J. Tsao, et al., Climate and ti ck seasonality are predictors of Borrelia burgdorferi genotype distribution, Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75 (8) (2009) 2476–2483. doi:10.1128/AEM.02633-08

    work page doi:10.1128/aem.02633-08 2009

  20. [20]

    Ogden, A

    N. Ogden, A. Maarouf, I. Barker, M. Bigras-Poulin, L. Li ndsay, M. Morshed, C. O’callaghan, F. Ramay, D. Waltner-Toews, D. Charron, Cli mate change and the potential for range expansion of the Lyme disease vector Ixodes scapu- laris in Canada, International Journal for Parasitology 36 (1) (2 006) 63–70. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.08.016

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.08.016 2005

  21. [21]

    Carrera-Pineyro, H

    D. Carrera-Pineyro, H. Hanes, A. Litzler, A. McCormack , J. Velazquez-Molina, A. Mubayi, K. Ríos-Soto, C. Kribs, Cost analysis of vaccinat ion in tick-mouse transmission of Lyme disease, Journal of Theoretical Biolo gy 494 (2020) 110245. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110245

    arXiv 2020

  22. [22]

    T. C. Porco, A mathematical model of the ecology of Lyme d isease, Mathe- matical Medicine and Biology: A Journal of the IMA 16 (3) (199 9) 261–296. doi:10.1093/imammb/16.3.261

    work page doi:10.1093/imammb/16.3.261

  23. [23]

    A. R. Giardina, K. A. Schmidt, E. M. Schauber, R. S. Ostfe ld, Modeling the role of songbirds and rodents in the ecology of Lyme disease, Canadi an Journal of Zoology 78 (12) (2000) 2184–2197. doi:10.1139/z00-162

    work page doi:10.1139/z00-162 2000

  24. [24]

    Peterson, E

    C. Peterson, E. Gallo, M. Allen, C. Kribs, Host contribu tions to Borrelia burgdorferi infection prevalence in Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) nymphs, JME, in press (2026)

    2026

  25. [25]

    Eisen, Seasonal activity patterns of Ixodes scapularis and Ixodes pacificus in the United States, Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases 16 (1) (2 025) 102433

    L. Eisen, Seasonal activity patterns of Ixodes scapularis and Ixodes pacificus in the United States, Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases 16 (1) (2 025) 102433. doi:10.1016/j.ttbdis.2024.102433

    arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Division of Vector-Borne Diseases

    National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious D iseases (U.S.). Division of Vector-Borne Diseases. Bacterial Dise ases Branch., Surveillance for Ixodes scapularis and pathogens found in this tick species in the united states , Tech. rep., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Nov . 2022). URL https://www.cdc.gov/ticks/resources/TickSurveillan...

    2022

  27. [27]

    Tietjen, M

    M. Tietjen, M. D. Esteve-Gasent, A. Y. Li, R. F. Medina, A compar- ative evaluation of northern and southern Ixodes scapularis questing height and hiding behaviour in the USA, Parasitology 147 (13) (2020 ) 1569–1576. doi:10.1017/S003118202000147X

    work page doi:10.1017/s003118202000147x 2020

  28. [28]

    L. R. Lindsay, I. K. Barker, G. A. Surgeoner, S. A. Mcewen , T. J. Gillespie, E. M. Addison, Survival and development of the different life stag es of Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) held within four habitats on Long Point, O ntario, Canada, Journal of Medical Entomology 35 (3) (1998) 189–199. doi:10.1093/jmedent/35.3.189

    work page doi:10.1093/jmedent/35.3.189 1998

  29. [29]

    B. Leal, E. Zamora, A. Fuentes, D. B. Thomas, R. K. Dearth , Questing by tick larvae (Acari: Ixodidae): a review of the influences tha t affect off-host sur- vival, Annals of the Entomological Society of America 113 (6 ) (2020) 425–438. doi:10.1093/aesa/saaa013. 30

    work page doi:10.1093/aesa/saaa013 2020

  30. [30]

    R. J. Eisen, L. Eisen, N. H. Ogden, C. B. Beard, Linkages o f weather and climate with Ixodes scapularis and Ixodes pacificus (Acari: Ixodidae), enzootic transmission of Borrelia burgdorferi , and Lyme disease in North America, Journal of Medical Entomology 53 (2) (2016) 250–261. doi:10.1093/jme/tjv199

    work page doi:10.1093/jme/tjv199 2016

  31. [31]

    J. M. Cushing, Z. Yicang, The net reproductive value and stability in ma- trix population models, Natural Resource Modeling 8 (4) (19 94) 297–333. doi:10.1111/j.1939-7445.1994.tb00188.x

    arXiv 1939

  32. [32]

    Cushing, J

    J. Cushing, J. Li, On Ebenman’s model for the dynamics of a population with competing juveniles and adults, Bulletin of Mathematical B iology 51 (6) (1989) 687–713. doi:10.1016/S0092-8240(89)80058-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0092-8240(89)80058-8 1989

  33. [33]

    Cushing, Nonlinear semelparous Leslie models, Math ematical Biosciences and Engineering 3 (1) (2006) 17

    J. Cushing, Nonlinear semelparous Leslie models, Math ematical Biosciences and Engineering 3 (1) (2006) 17. doi:10.3934/mbe.2006.3.17

    work page doi:10.3934/mbe.2006.3.17 2006

  34. [34]

    J. M. Cushing, Three stage semelparous Leslie models, J ournal of Mathematical Biology 59 (1) (2009) 75–104. doi:10.1007/s00285-008-0208-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s00285-008-0208-9 2009

  35. [35]

    T. J. Daniels, R. C. Falco, D. Fish, Estimating populati on size and drag sampling efficiency for the blacklegged tick (Acari: Ixo- didae), Journal of Medical Entomology 37 (3) (2000) 357–363 . doi:10.1603/0022-2585(2000)037[0357:EPSADS]2.0.CO;2

    work page doi:10.1603/0022-2585(2000)037 2000

  36. [36]

    J. L. Brunner, S. L. LaDeau, M. Killilea, E. Valentine, M . Schierer, R. S. Os- tfeld, Off-host survival of blacklegged ticks in eastern Nor th America: A mul- tistage, multiyear, multisite study, Ecological Monograp hs 93 (3) (2023) e1572. doi:10.1002/ecm.1572

    work page doi:10.1002/ecm.1572 2023

  37. [37]

    Ostfeld, K

    R. Ostfeld, K. Oggenfuss, Long term monitoring of the dynamics of rodents, ticks and Ly me disease risk Dataset (2023). doi:10.25390/caryinstitute.23611374.v1. URL https://doi.org/10.25390/caryinstitute.23611374.v1

    work page doi:10.25390/caryinstitute.23611374.v1 2023

  38. [38]

    A. S. Baker, K. A. Persinger, P. U. Olafson, A. O. Mulenga , T. L. Johnson, Feeding and reproductive parameters of adult female Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) and Amblyomma americanum parasitizing white-tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus ), Journal of Medical Entomology 61 (1) (2024) 245–249. doi:10.1093/jme/tjad144

    work page doi:10.1093/jme/tjad144 2024

  39. [39]

    Piesman, A

    J. Piesman, A. Spielman, P. Etkind, T. K. Ruebush, D. D. J uranek, Role of deer in the epizootiology of Babesia microti in Massachusetts, USA, Journal of Medical Entomology 15 (5-6) (1979) 537–540. doi:10.1093/jmedent/15.5-6.537

    work page doi:10.1093/jmedent/15.5-6.537 1979

  40. [40]

    D. P. Snyder, Tamias striatus, Mammalian Species 168 (1982) 1–8

    1982

  41. [41]

    A. J. Main, A. B. Carey, M. G. Carey, R. H. Goodwin, Immatu re Ixodes dammini (Acari: Ixodidae) on small animals in Connecticut, USA, Jou rnal of Medical Ento- mology 19 (6) (1982) 655–664. doi:10.1093/jmedent/19.6.655

    work page doi:10.1093/jmedent/19.6.655 1982

  42. [42]

    D. W. Morris, Proximate and ultimate controls on life-h istory variation: The evo- lution of litter size in white-footed mice ( Peromyscus leucopus ), Evolution 40 (1) (1986) 169–181. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb05728.x

    arXiv 1986

  43. [43]

    Mehlhop, J

    P. Mehlhop, J. F. Lynch, Population characteristics of Peromyscus leucopus intro- duced to islands inhabited by Microtus pennsylvanicus, Oikos 31 (1) (1978) 17–26. doi:10.2307/3543379

    work page doi:10.2307/3543379 1978

  44. [44]

    Chitty, W

    D. Chitty, W. H. Burt, W. Dowdeswell, R. Fisher, E. Ford, Territorial behavior and populations of some small mammals in southern Michigan, Journal of Animal Ecology 10 (1) (1941) 146. 31

    1941

  45. [45]

    D. G. Innes, J. F. Bendell, B. J. Naylor, B. A. Smith, High densities of the masked shrew, Sorex cinereus, in jack pine plantations in northern Ontario, American Mid - land Naturalist 124 (2) (1990) 330–341. doi:10.2307/2426182

    work page doi:10.2307/2426182 1990

  46. [46]

    J. O. J. Whitaker, W. J. J. Hamilton, Mammals of the Easte rn United States, 3rd Edition, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1998

    1998

  47. [47]

    J. F. Merritt, Clethrionomys gapperi , Mammalian Species (1981) 1– 9doi:10.2307/3503900

    work page doi:10.2307/3503900 1981

  48. [48]

    D. G. Innes, The life-history tactics of the voles, Clethrionomys gapperi and Microtus pennsylvanicus, at two elevations, Canadian Journal of Zoology 62 (2) (1984 ) 445–

    1984

  49. [49]

    J. N. Layne, The os genitale of the red squirrel, Tamiasciurus, Journal of Mammalogy 33 (4) (1952) 457–459

    1952

  50. [50]

    F. S. Barkalow Jr, R. B. Hamilton, R. F. Soots Jr, The vita l statistics of an un- exploited gray squirrel population, The Journal of Wildlif e Management 34 (1970) 489–500. doi:10.2307/3798852

    work page doi:10.2307/3798852 1970

  51. [51]

    G. A. Kemp, L. B. Keith, Dynamics and regulation of red sq uirrel ( Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) populations, Ecology 51 (5) (1970) 763–779. doi:10.2307/1933969

    work page doi:10.2307/1933969 1970

  52. [52]

    B. J. Howes, S. C. Lougheed, Cosewic assessment and update status report on the five-line d skink ( Eume Tech. rep., Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife i n Canada, Ottawa, ON, Carolinian population - Endangered; Great Lakes/St. La wrence population - Special Concern (2007). URL https://wildlife-species.canada.ca/species-risk-reg istry/virtual_s...

    2007

  53. [53]

    C. N. L. Seburn, Population ecology of the five-lined ski nk, Eumeces fasciatus , at Point Pelee National Park, Canada, M.Sc. thesis, Universit y of Windsor, Ontario, Canada (1990)

    1990

  54. [54]

    D. W. Tinkle, R. E. Ballinger, Sceloporus undulatus : a study of the in- traspecific comparative demography of a lizard, Ecology 53 ( 4) (1972) 570–584. doi:10.2307/1934772

    work page doi:10.2307/1934772 1972

  55. [55]

    L. J. Verme, D. E. Ullrey, Physiology and nutrition, in: L. K. Halls (Ed.), White- tailed Deer: Ecology and Management, Stackpole Books, Harr isburg, Pennsylvania, 1984, pp. 91–118, 870 pp

    1984

  56. [56]

    D. W. Lay, Ecology of the opossum in eastern Texas, Journ al of Mammalogy 23 (2) (1942) 147–159. doi:10.2307/1375067

    work page doi:10.2307/1375067 1942

  57. [57]

    Johnson, J

    T. Johnson, J. Bjork, D. Neitzel, F. Dorr, E. Schiffman, R . Eisen, Habitat suitabil- ity model for the distribution of Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) in Minnesota, Journal of Medical Entomology 53 (3) (2016) 598–606. doi:10.1093/jme/tjw008

    work page doi:10.1093/jme/tjw008 2016

  58. [58]

    LoGiudice, R

    K. LoGiudice, R. S. Ostfeld, K. A. Schmidt, F. Keesing, T he ecology of infec- tious disease: effects of host diversity and community compo sition on Lyme dis- ease risk, Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences 1 00 (2) (2003) 567–571. doi:10.1073/pnas.0233733100

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.0233733100 2003

  59. [59]

    S. R. Larson, Ecology of Ixodes scapularis and tick-borne diseases in Wisconsin, Master’s thesis, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madiso n, WI (2017)

    2017

  60. [60]

    Foster, K

    E. Foster, K. M. Holcomb, R. J. Eisen, Density of host-se eking Ixodes scapularis nymphs by region, state, and county in the contiguous United States generated through national tick surveillance, Ticks and Tick-borne D iseases 15 (3) (2024) 102316. doi:10.1016/j.ttbdis.2024.102316. 32

    arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    S. A. Hamer, J. I. Tsao, E. D. Walker, G. J. Hickling, Inva sion of the Lyme disease vector Ixodes scapularis: implications for Borrelia burgdorferi endemicity, Ecohealth 7 (2010) 47–63. doi:10.1007/s10393-010-0287-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s10393-010-0287-0 2010

  62. [62]

    S. A. Hamer, T. L. Goldberg, U. D. Kitron, J. D. Brawn, T. K . Anderson, S. R. Loss, E. D. Walker, G. L. Hamer, Wild birds and urban ecology of tick s and tick-borne pathogens, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2005–2010, Emerging In fectious Diseases 18 (10) (2012) 1589. doi:10.3201/eid1810.120511

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  63. [63]

    S. R. Loss, B. H. Noden, G. L. Hamer, S. A. Hamer, A quantit ative synthesis of the role of birds in carrying ticks and tick-borne pathogens in N orth America, Oecologia 182 (4) (2016) 947–959. doi:10.1007/s00442-016-3731-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00442-016-3731-1 2016

  64. [64]

    Narasimhan, B

    S. Narasimhan, B. Cibichakravarthy, M.-J. Wu, M. M. Hol ter, C. A. Walsh, J. A. Goodrich, Laboratory management of mammalian hosts fo r Ixodes scapularis- host-pathogen interaction studies, Comparative Medicine 74 (4) (2024) 235–245. doi:10.30802/AALAS-CM-24-036

    work page doi:10.30802/aalas-cm-24-036 2024

  65. [65]

    A. B. Nuss, M. G. Mathew, M. Gulia-Nuss, Rearing ixodes s capularis, the black- legged tick: feeding immature stages on mice, Journal of Vis ualized Experiments: JoVE (2017) 55286Issue 123. doi:10.3791/55286

    work page doi:10.3791/55286 2017

  66. [66]

    C. A. Buckner, D. J. Shure, The response of Peromyscus to forest opening size in the southern Appalachian Mountains, Journal of Mammalogy 6 6 (2) (1985) 299–307. doi:10.2307/1381242

    work page doi:10.2307/1381242 1985

  67. [67]

    T. L. Scarlett, Acorn production and winter reproducti on in white-footed mice ( Per- omyscus leucopus ) in a southern piedmont forest, Southeastern Naturalist 3 ( 3) (2004) 483–494. doi:10.1656/1528-7092(2004)003[0483:APAWRI]2.0.CO;2

    work page doi:10.1656/1528-7092(2004)003 2004

  68. [68]

    J. C. Howell, Populations and home ranges of small mamma ls on an overgrown field, Journal of Mammalogy 35 (2) (1954) 177–186. doi:10.2307/1376031

    work page doi:10.2307/1376031 1954

  69. [69]

    McCarley, Fluctuations and structure of Peromyscus gossypinus popu- lations in eastern Texas, Journal of Mammalogy 35 (4) (1954) 526–532

    W. McCarley, Fluctuations and structure of Peromyscus gossypinus popu- lations in eastern Texas, Journal of Mammalogy 35 (4) (1954) 526–532. doi:10.2307/1375577

    work page doi:10.2307/1375577 1954

  70. [70]

    K. E. Mabry, E. A. Dreelin, G. W. Barrett, Influence of lan d- scape elements on population densities and habitat use of th ree small-mammal species, Journal of Mammalogy 84 (1) (2003) 20 –25. doi:10.1644/1545-1542(2003)084<0020:IOLEOP>2.0.CO;2

    work page doi:10.1644/1545-1542(2003)084 2003

  71. [71]

    J. O. Wolff, Population fluctuations of mast-eating rode nts are correlated with production of acorns, Journal of Mammalogy 77 (3) (1996 ) 850–856. doi:doi.org/10.2307/1382690

    work page doi:10.2307/1382690 1996

  72. [72]

    T. W. French, Natural history of the southeastern shrew , Sorex longirostris Bach- man, American Midland Naturalist 104 (1) (1980) 13–31. doi:10.2307/2424954

    work page doi:10.2307/2424954 1980

  73. [73]

    J. T. Kitchings, D. J. Levy, Habitat patterns in a small m ammal community, Journal of Mammalogy 62 (4) (1981) 814–820. doi:10.2307/1380604

    work page doi:10.2307/1380604 1981

  74. [74]

    D. A. Adams, J. S. Hammond, Changes in forest vegetation , bird, and small mammal populations at Mount Mitchell, North Carolina–1959/62 and 1985, Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 107 (1) (1991) 3–12

    1959

  75. [75]

    E. Williams, A comparison of eastern gray squirrel ( Sciurus carolinensis ) nesting behavior among habitats differing in anthropogenic disturb ance, Master’s thesis, Georgia Southern University (2011). 33

    2011

  76. [76]

    R. T. Stevens, Evaluation of three indices for estimati ng red squirrel Tamiasciurus hudsonicus relative abundance, Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Sci ence 74 (1999) 83–85

    1999

  77. [77]

    H. S. Fitch, Life History and Ecology of the Five-lined S kink, Eumeces fasciatus , Vol. 8, University of Kansas Publications of the Museum of Na tural History, 1954

    1954

  78. [78]

    W. S. Parker, Demography of the fence lizard, Sceloporus undulatus , in northern Mississippi, Copeia 1994 (1) (1994) 136–152. doi:10.2307/1446680

    work page doi:10.2307/1446680 1994

  79. [79]

    G. R. Brooks, Population ecology of the ground skink, Lygosoma laterale (Say), Ecological Monographs 37 (2) (1967) 72–87. doi:10.2307/2937336

    work page doi:10.2307/2937336 1967

  80. [80]

    J. A. Akin, Fourier series estimation of ground skink po pulation density, Copeia 1998 (2) (1998) 519–522. doi:10.2307/1447455

    work page doi:10.2307/1447455 1998

Showing first 80 references.