Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Weitzman's Rule for Pandora's Box with Correlations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.13534 v1 pith:4M6UWBMB submitted 2023-01-31 cs.DS

Weitzman's Rule for Pandora's Box with Correlations

classification cs.DS
keywords openingalgorithmboxescorrelatedcostgivenpandorarule
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Pandora's Box is a central problem in decision making under uncertainty that can model various real life scenarios. In this problem we are given $n$ boxes, each with a fixed opening cost, and an unknown value drawn from a known distribution, only revealed if we pay the opening cost. Our goal is to find a strategy for opening boxes to minimize the sum of the value selected and the opening cost paid. In this work we revisit Pandora's Box when the value distributions are correlated, first studied in Chawla et al. (arXiv:1911.01632). We show that the optimal algorithm for the independent case, given by Weitzman's rule, directly works for the correlated case. In fact, our algorithm results in significantly improved approximation guarantees compared to the previous work, while also being substantially simpler. We finally show how to implement the rule given only sample access to the correlated distribution of values. Specifically, we find that a number of samples that is polynomial in the number of boxes is sufficient for the algorithm to work.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. T-TAMER: Provably Taming Trade-offs in ML Serving

    cs.LG 2025-09 reject novelty 3.0

    T-TAMER claims recall is necessary and sufficient for provably optimal early-exit and cascade serving policies, but the main extensions are under-derived and partly reduce to known Gittins-index results.