pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.14394 · v1 · pith:4MBAWKDRnew · submitted 2026-05-14 · 🪐 quant-ph

Nonreciprocal magnon-magnon entanglement in a spinning cavity-magnon system

Zhisheng Xu , Mengxue Li , Chunfang Sun , Gangcheng Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 02:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords nonreciprocal entanglementmagnon-magnon entanglementspinning cavityKerr nonlinearitySagnac effectcavity magnonicsquantum entanglementthermal robustness
0
0 comments X

The pith

Spinning a cavity with two yttrium iron garnet spheres produces nonreciprocal magnon-magnon entanglement via Kerr nonlinearity and the Sagnac effect.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a scheme to create entanglement between magnons in two separate yttrium iron garnet spheres that sit inside a whispering-gallery-mode cavity. Rotation of the cavity introduces the Sagnac effect, which, together with the intrinsic magnon Kerr nonlinearity, both strengthens the entanglement and makes it depend on the direction of the rotation. The resulting entanglement stays stable against thermal noise and survives when the surrounding bath reaches 100 millikelvin. This combination offers a route to direction-sensitive quantum correlations without needing external magnetic fields or additional lossy elements.

Core claim

In a hybrid system of two magnon modes coupled to a spinning cavity, the magnon Kerr nonlinearity combined with the rotation-induced Sagnac effect generates substantially enhanced magnon-magnon entanglement that displays clear nonreciprocal behavior and remains robust against thermal noise up to bath temperatures of 100 mK.

What carries the argument

The spinning whispering-gallery-mode cavity containing two yttrium iron garnet spheres, where cavity rotation supplies the Sagnac phase shift that breaks reciprocity while the magnon Kerr nonlinearity amplifies the entanglement.

If this is right

  • The entanglement strength increases markedly compared with the stationary cavity case.
  • The entanglement becomes strongly nonreciprocal, showing different values for clockwise versus counterclockwise rotation.
  • The entanglement persists at bath temperatures up to 100 mK despite the presence of thermal noise.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Direction-dependent entanglement could be used to build quantum routers or isolators that process signals differently according to propagation direction.
  • The same rotation-induced asymmetry might be adapted to other hybrid platforms such as optomechanical or superconducting circuits to create tunable nonreciprocal quantum gates.
  • Varying the rotation speed offers an experimental knob to switch the nonreciprocity on and off without changing the static coupling strengths.

Load-bearing premise

The magnon Kerr nonlinearity and the ideal cavity-magnon coupling can be preserved while the Sagnac effect from rotation produces nonreciprocity without introducing significant extra losses or decoherence channels.

What would settle it

Measuring the logarithmic negativity of the magnon-magnon state while reversing the cavity rotation direction and observing whether the entanglement strength changes by a large factor, or checking whether the negativity drops to zero above 100 mK, would test the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14394 by Chunfang Sun, Gangcheng Wang, Mengxue Li, Zhisheng Xu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of the spinning WGM cavity-magnon sys [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the relationship between magnon-magnon en￾tanglement E m1m2 N and normalized cavity field frequency de￾tuning ∆a/2π. From Figs. 4(a) and (b), we can clearly ob￾serve the nonreciprocal entanglement caused by both effects. When the direction of the driving field or the magnetic field is changed, the distribution of entanglement shifts. Addition￾ally, as the cavity field frequency detuning ∆a increases,… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The impact of the normalized Kerr frequency shift [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: further illustrates the effect of coupling strength on the nonreciprocal magnon-magnon entanglement. When gm1a = gm2a = gma is fixed, as the coupling strength increases to gma/2π ≈ 4 MHz, the optimal entanglement is reached. If the coupling strength continues to increase, the entanglement decreases. This is because the initial increase in coupling strength enhances the interaction between the optical field… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The e [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The e [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Cavity-magnon systems, combining magnons and photons, offer a versatile platform for studying quantum entanglement and advancing quantum information science. In this work, we propose a scheme for generating nonreciprocal magnon-magnon entanglement in a hybrid system consisting of two yttrium iron garnet spheres coupled to a spinning whispering-gallery-mode cavity. By leveraging the magnon Kerr nonlinearity and the Sagnac effect arising from the cavity rotation, we show that the entanglement can be substantially enhanced, and the resulting entanglement exhibits pronounced nonreciprocal characteristics. Furthermore, our scheme demonstrates that the entanglement remains robust against thermal noise and persists at bath temperatures up to 100 mK. This work underscores the potential of spinning cavity-magnon systems as a versatile platform for realizing nonreciprocal quantum devices and facilitating the development of quantum technologies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a theoretical proposal for achieving nonreciprocal magnon-magnon entanglement in a system of two yttrium iron garnet (YIG) spheres coupled to a spinning whispering-gallery-mode cavity. By incorporating magnon Kerr nonlinearity and the Sagnac effect from cavity rotation, the authors claim that entanglement is substantially enhanced, exhibits pronounced nonreciprocal characteristics, and remains robust against thermal noise up to bath temperatures of 100 mK.

Significance. If the central claims hold after addressing the modeling concerns, this would represent a useful advance in cavity magnonics by providing a controllable mechanism for directional entanglement via rotation and nonlinearity. The thermal robustness result, if substantiated, would strengthen the case for experimental relevance in cryogenic setups.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III] The effective master equation (Sec. III) omits rotation-dependent loss channels (e.g., additional Lindblad terms whose rates scale with angular velocity Ω such as enhanced scattering or Doppler broadening). This is load-bearing for the nonreciprocity claim, as the Sagnac phase shift must produce directional asymmetry in the magnon-magnon coupling without being masked by these terms; their absence risks making the logarithmic negativity predictions an artifact of an incomplete decoherence model.
  2. [Sec. IV] The thermal robustness analysis (Sec. IV, results on logarithmic negativity vs. temperature) does not include sensitivity checks against the omitted Ω-dependent losses. The persistence up to 100 mK relies on coherent rates (Kerr and Sagnac) dominating thermal occupation n_th, but without quantifying how additional rotation-induced decoherence would shift this threshold, the claim cannot be fully verified.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract could specify the entanglement quantifier (e.g., logarithmic negativity) and the precise definition of nonreciprocity (e.g., asymmetry between clockwise and counterclockwise rotation).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive comments. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Sec. III] The effective master equation (Sec. III) omits rotation-dependent loss channels (e.g., additional Lindblad terms whose rates scale with angular velocity Ω such as enhanced scattering or Doppler broadening). This is load-bearing for the nonreciprocity claim, as the Sagnac phase shift must produce directional asymmetry in the magnon-magnon coupling without being masked by these terms; their absence risks making the logarithmic negativity predictions an artifact of an incomplete decoherence model.

    Authors: In our derivation of the effective master equation, we have focused on the coherent dynamics induced by the Sagnac effect and the magnon Kerr nonlinearity, while using standard phenomenological decay rates for the cavity and magnons that are independent of the rotation speed Ω. This is justified in the regime where the rotation is slow enough that additional loss mechanisms like Doppler broadening or enhanced scattering are much smaller than the intrinsic κ and γ. To address the referee's concern, we will add a paragraph in Sec. III discussing the validity of this approximation and providing an order-of-magnitude estimate showing that for the parameters used (Ω/2π ~ few kHz), these effects do not mask the nonreciprocity. We will also include a brief sensitivity analysis in the revised manuscript. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Sec. IV] The thermal robustness analysis (Sec. IV, results on logarithmic negativity vs. temperature) does not include sensitivity checks against the omitted Ω-dependent losses. The persistence up to 100 mK relies on coherent rates (Kerr and Sagnac) dominating thermal occupation n_th, but without quantifying how additional rotation-induced decoherence would shift this threshold, the claim cannot be fully verified.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a sensitivity check would further substantiate the thermal robustness claim. In the revised version, we will include an additional figure or discussion in Sec. IV showing the logarithmic negativity as a function of temperature for different values of an effective Ω-dependent loss rate (e.g., assuming it scales linearly or quadratically with Ω). Our preliminary checks indicate that the entanglement persists up to ~80-100 mK even with moderate additional losses, but we will quantify this explicitly to confirm the robustness against thermal noise. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation uses standard physical effects without self-referential definitions or fitted predictions

full rationale

The paper proposes a scheme for nonreciprocal magnon-magnon entanglement by combining established magnon Kerr nonlinearity with the Sagnac effect from cavity rotation. No equations or parameters are defined in terms of the target entanglement quantities themselves, and no 'predictions' reduce to fitted inputs by construction. The robustness claims at 100 mK follow from the modeled master equation under standard assumptions rather than from any self-citation chain or ansatz smuggled via prior work. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks of cavity-magnon physics.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions in cavity QED and magnonics; no new entities are postulated and no free parameters are numerically fitted in the given text.

free parameters (2)
  • cavity rotation rate
    Controls the Sagnac effect strength that induces nonreciprocity
  • magnon Kerr nonlinearity coefficient
    Assumed present and tuned to enhance entanglement
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Magnons in YIG spheres exhibit Kerr nonlinearity
    Standard property invoked to enable entanglement enhancement
  • domain assumption Cavity rotation produces a Sagnac effect that breaks reciprocity in mode coupling
    Core mechanism for nonreciprocal behavior

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5439 in / 1357 out tokens · 59332 ms · 2026-05-15T02:14:54.811974+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Horodecki, P

    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Reviews of Modern Physics81, 865 (2009)

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    Vedral, Quantum entanglement, Nature Physics10, 256 (2014)

    V . Vedral, Quantum entanglement, Nature Physics10, 256 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Steane, Quantum computing, Reports on Progress in Physics 9 61, 117 (1998)

    A. Steane, Quantum computing, Reports on Progress in Physics 9 61, 117 (1998)

    work page 1998

  4. [4]

    Rietsche, C

    R. Rietsche, C. Dremel, S. Bosch, L. Steinacker, M. Meckel, and J.-M. Leimeister, Quantum computing, Electronic Markets 32, 2525 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Brassard, Quantum communication complexity, Foundations of Physics33, 1593 (2003)

    G. Brassard, Quantum communication complexity, Foundations of Physics33, 1593 (2003)

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    Gisin and R

    N. Gisin and R. Thew, Quantum communication, Nature pho- tonics1, 165 (2007)

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    Lvovsky, R

    A. Lvovsky, R. Ghobadi, A. Chandra, A. Prasad, and C. Si- mon, Observation of micro–macro entanglement of light, Na- ture Physics9, 541 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    S.-S. B. Lee, J. Park, and H.-S. Sim, Macroscopic quantum en- tanglement of a kondo cloud at finite temperature, Physical Re- view Letters114, 057203 (2015)

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    Wang, X.-Y

    M. Wang, X.-Y . L¨u, Y .-D. Wang, J. Q. You, and Y . Wu, Macro- scopic quantum entanglement in modulated optomechanics, Physical Review A94, 053807 (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Zhong, X

    C. Zhong, X. Han, and L. Jiang, Microwave and optical entan- glement for quantum transduction with electro-optomechanics, Physical Review Applied18, 054061 (2022)

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    T. Tian, Y . Zhang, L. Zhang, L. Wu, S. Lin, J. Zhou, C.-K. Duan, J.-H. Jiang, and J. Du, Experimental realization of non- reciprocal adiabatic transfer of phonons in a dynamically mod- ulated nanomechanical topological insulator, Physical Review Letters129, 215901 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature453, 1023 (2008)

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    B. J. Lawrie, P. D. Lett, A. M. Marino, and R. C. Pooser, Quan- tum sensing with squeezed light, Acs Photonics6, 1307 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Zhang and Q

    Z. Zhang and Q. Zhuang, Distributed quantum sensing, Quan- tum Science and Technology6, 043001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  15. [15]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 035002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Zhang, G

    W.-H. Zhang, G. Chen, X.-X. Peng, X.-J. Ye, P. Yin, X.-Y . Xu, J.-S. Xu, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Experimental realization of robust self-testing of bell state measurements, Physical Review Letters122, 090402 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Cr ´epeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and einstein-podolsky-rosen channels, Physical Review Letters70, 1895 (1993)

    work page 1993

  18. [18]

    Tian and Z

    L. Tian and Z. Li, Nonreciprocal quantum-state conversion be- tween microwave and optical photons, Physical Review A96, 013808 (2017)

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Eshaqi-Sani, S

    N. Eshaqi-Sani, S. Zippilli, and D. Vitali, Nonreciprocal con- version between radio-frequency and optical photons with an optoelectromechanical system, Physical Review A106, 032606 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    A. V . Chumak, V . I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hille- brands, Magnon spintronics, Nature Physics11, 453 (2015)

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    H. Yuan, Y . Cao, A. Kamra, R. A. Duine, and P. Yan, Quantum magnonics: When magnon spintronics meets quantum informa- tion science, Physics Reports965, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Zare Rameshti, S

    B. Zare Rameshti, S. Viola Kusminskiy, J. A. Haigh, K. Usami, D. Lachance-Quirion, Y . Nakamura, C.-M. Hu, H. X. Tang, G. E. Bauer, and Y . M. Blanter, Cavity magnonics, Physics Re- ports979, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Mallmann, A

    E. Mallmann, A. Sombra, J. Goes, and P. Fechine, Yttrium iron garnet: Properties and applications review, Solid State Phenom- ena202, 65 (2013)

    work page 2013

  24. [24]

    Wang and C.-M

    Y .-P. Wang and C.-M. Hu, Dissipative couplings in cavity magnonics, Journal of Applied Physics127, 130901 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Harder, B

    M. Harder, B. M. Yao, Y . S. Gui, and C.-M. Hu, Coherent and dissipative cavity magnonics, Journal of Applied Physics129, 201101 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Zhang, C.-L

    X. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, N. Zhu, F. Marquardt, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, Magnon dark modes and gradient memory, Nature Com- munications6, 8914 (2015)

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    C. Kong, H. Xiong, and Y . Wu, Magnon-induced nonreciprocity based on the magnon kerr effect, Physical Review Applied12, 034001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    Miri and A

    M.-A. Miri and A. Al `u, Exceptional points in optics and pho- tonics, Science363, eaar7709 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    Chen, S ¸

    W. Chen, S ¸. Kaya ¨Ozdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity, Nature548, 192 (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Zhang and J

    G.-Q. Zhang and J. Q. You, Higher-order exceptional point in a cavity magnonics system, Physical Review B99, 054404 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    J. Zhao, L. Wu, T. Li, Y .-x. Liu, F. Nori, Y . Liu, and J. Du, Phase-controlled pathway interferences and switchable fast- slow light in a cavity-magnon polariton system, Physical Re- view Applied15, 024056 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Mozjerin, S

    I. Mozjerin, S. Ruschin, and A. A. Hardy, Analysis of relaxation oscillations and gain switching of unidirectional erbium-doped waveguide ring lasers, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 46, 158 (2010)

    work page 2010

  33. [33]

    Otani and T

    Y . Otani and T. Kimura, Manipulation of spin currents in metal- lic systems, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences369, 3136 (2011)

    work page 2011

  34. [34]

    K. J. Dempsey, D. Ciudad, and C. H. Marrows, Single elec- tron spintronics, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Soci- ety A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences369, 3150 (2011)

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    Flower, M

    G. Flower, M. Goryachev, J. Bourhill, and M. E. Tobar, Exper- imental implementations of cavity-magnon systems: from ultra strong coupling to applications in precision measurement, New Journal of Physics21, 095004 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    T. P. Purdy, D. W. C. Brooks, T. Botter, N. Brahms, Z.-Y . Ma, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Tunable cavity optomechanics with ultracold atoms, Physical Review Letters105, 133602 (2010)

    work page 2010

  37. [37]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity op- tomechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics86, 1391 (2014)

    work page 2014

  38. [38]

    Metcalfe, Applications of cavity optomechanics, Applied Physics Reviews1, 031105 (2014)

    M. Metcalfe, Applications of cavity optomechanics, Applied Physics Reviews1, 031105 (2014)

    work page 2014

  39. [39]

    Li, S.-Y

    J. Li, S.-Y . Zhu, and G. S. Agarwal, Magnon-photon-phonon entanglement in cavity magnomechanics, Physical Review Let- ters121, 203601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Chen, M.-Y

    Q.-G. Chen, M.-Y . Liu, X.-X. Huang, J. Chen, and W. Xiong, Hybrid cavity-magnon optomechanics: Tailoring bipartite and tripartite macroscopic entanglement, Chaos, Solitons & Frac- tals202, 117472 (2026)

    work page 2026

  41. [41]

    Li, S.-Y

    J. Li, S.-Y . Zhu, and G. S. Agarwal, Squeezed states of magnons and phonons in cavity magnomechanics, Physical Review A99, 021801 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    Kang and Y

    H. Kang and Y . Zhu, Observation of large kerr nonlinearity at low light intensities, Physical Review Letters91, 093601 (2003)

    work page 2003

  43. [43]

    R.-C. Shen, J. Li, Z.-Y . Fan, Y .-P. Wang, and J. Q. You, Me- chanical bistability in kerr-modified cavity magnomechanics, Physical Review Letters129, 123601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Xiong, M

    W. Xiong, M. Wang, G.-Q. Zhang, and J. Chen, Optomechanical-interface-induced strong spin-magnon coupling, Physical Review A107, 033516 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Zhang, Z

    G.-Q. Zhang, Z. Chen, W. Xiong, C.-H. Lam, and J. Q. You, Parity-symmetry-breaking quantum phase transition via para- metric drive in a cavity magnonic system, Physical Review B 104, 064423 (2021). 10

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    G. Liu, W. Xiong, and Z.-J. Ying, Switchable superradiant phase transition with kerr magnons, Physical Review A108, 033704 (2023)

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    Zhang, Y

    G.-Q. Zhang, Y . Wang, and W. Xiong, Detection sensitivity en- hancement of magnon kerr nonlinearity in cavity magnonics in- duced by coherent perfect absorption, Physical Review B107, 064417 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Chen, X.-G

    J. Chen, X.-G. Fan, W. Xiong, D. Wang, and L. Ye, Nonrecip- rocal entanglement in cavity-magnon optomechanics, Physical Review B108, 024105 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    Chakraborty and C

    S. Chakraborty and C. Das, Nonreciprocal magnon-photon- phonon entanglement in cavity magnomechanics, Physical Re- view A108, 063704 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Chen, X.-G

    J. Chen, X.-G. Fan, W. Xiong, D. Wang, and L. Ye, Nonrecipro- cal photon-phonon entanglement in kerr-modified spinning cav- ity magnomechanics, Physical Review A109, 043512 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Lu, Z.-S

    T.-X. Lu, Z.-S. Li, L.-S. Chen, Y . Wang, X. Xiao, and H. Jing, Nonreciprocal entanglement in cavity magnomechanics via the barnett effect, Physical Review A111, 013713 (2025)

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    Ren, S.-l

    Y .-l. Ren, S.-l. Ma, J.-k. Xie, X.-k. Li, M.-t. Cao, and F.-l. Li, Nonreciprocal single-photon quantum router, Physical Review A105, 013711 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Deng, K.-K

    X. Deng, K.-K. Zhang, T. Shui, and W.-X. Yang, Nonrecipro- cal unconventional magnon blockade via the sagnac-fizeau shift in an optomagnonic system, Physical Review A110, 063711 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Xu, J.-Y

    Y . Xu, J.-Y . Liu, W. Liu, and Y .-F. Xiao, Nonreciprocal phonon laser in a spinning microwave magnomechanical system, Phys- ical Review A103, 053501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    Huang, Y

    K.-W. Huang, Y . Wu, and L.-G. Si, Parametric-amplification- induced nonreciprocal magnon laser, Optics Letters47, 3311 (2022)

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    K. Xia, F. Jelezko, and J. Twamley, Quantum routing of sin- gle optical photons with a superconducting flux qubit, Physical Review A97, 052315 (2018)

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    H. Jing, H. L ¨u, S. K. ¨Ozdemir, T. Carmon, and F. Nori, Nanoparticle sensing with a spinning resonator, Optica5, 1424 (2018)

    work page 2018

  58. [58]

    Caloz, A

    C. Caloz, A. Al `u, S. Tretyakov, D. Sounas, K. Achouri, and Z.- L. Deck-L ´eger, Electromagnetic nonreciprocity, Physical Re- view Applied10, 047001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    Y . Chen, Y . Yin, L. Ma, and O. G. Schmidt, Recent progress on optoplasmonic whispering-gallery-mode microcavities, Ad- vanced Optical Materials9, 2100143 (2021)

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    Sharma, Y

    S. Sharma, Y . M. Blanter, and G. E. W. Bauer, Light scatter- ing by magnons in whispering gallery mode cavities, Physical Review B96, 094412 (2017)

    work page 2017

  61. [61]

    E. J. POST, Sagnac effect, Reviews of Modern Physics39, 475 (1967)

    work page 1967

  62. [62]

    Huebl, C

    H. Huebl, C. W. Zollitsch, J. Lotze, F. Hocke, M. Greifenstein, A. Marx, R. Gross, and S. T. B. Goennenwein, High cooper- ativity in coupled microwave resonator ferrimagnetic insulator hybrids, Physical Review Letters111, 127003 (2013)

    work page 2013

  63. [63]

    Tabuchi, S

    Y . Tabuchi, S. Ishino, T. Ishikawa, R. Yamazaki, K. Usami, and Y . Nakamura, Hybridizing ferromagnetic magnons and mi- crowave photons in the quantum limit, Physical Review Letters 113, 083603 (2014)

    work page 2014

  64. [64]

    Zhang, C.-L

    X. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, Strongly cou- pled magnons and cavity microwave photons, Physical Review Letters113, 156401 (2014)

    work page 2014

  65. [65]

    G. B. Malykin, The sagnac effect: correct and incorrect expla- nations, Physics-Uspekhi43, 1229 (2000)

    work page 2000

  66. [66]

    Maayani, R

    S. Maayani, R. Dahan, Y . Kligerman, E. Moses, A. U. Hassan, H. Jing, F. Nori, D. N. Christodoulides, and T. Carmon, Flying couplers above spinning resonators generate irreversible refrac- tion, Nature558, 569 (2018)

    work page 2018

  67. [67]

    Zhang, Y

    G. Zhang, Y . Wang, and J. You, Theory of the magnon kerr effect in cavity magnonics, Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy62, 1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    Wang, G.-Q

    Y .-P. Wang, G.-Q. Zhang, D. Zhang, T.-F. Li, C.-M. Hu, and J. Q. You, Bistability of cavity magnon polaritons, Physical Re- view Letters120, 057202 (2018)

    work page 2018

  69. [69]

    Wang, G.-Q

    Y .-P. Wang, G.-Q. Zhang, D. Zhang, X.-Q. Luo, W. Xiong, S.-P. Wang, T.-F. Li, C.-M. Hu, and J. Q. You, Magnon kerr effect in a strongly coupled cavity-magnon system, Physical Review B 94, 224410 (2016)

    work page 2016

  70. [70]

    E. X. DeJesus and C. Kaufman, Routh-hurwitz criterion in the examination of eigenvalues of a system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations, Physical Review A35, 5288 (1987)

    work page 1987

  71. [71]

    Xiong, M

    W. Xiong, M. Tian, G.-Q. Zhang, and J. Q. You, Strong long- range spin-spin coupling via a kerr magnon interface, Physical Review B105, 245310 (2022)

    work page 2022