Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 28 references

Rack-integrated quantum dot-based source of single and entangled photons at telecom C-band

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that a record-setting telecom C-band quantum dot source can be packed into a transportable, remotely controlled rack without losing its single-photon and entanglement performance.

desk verdict Solid rack-integration engineering with a real deployed-fiber run; but the entanglement and coincidence headlines come from the companion paper, and the >50% transmission is asserted, not shown. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.21454 v1 pith:4MYRB4RU submitted 2026-07-23 quant-ph cond-mat.otherphysics.optics

Michal Vyvlecka , Raphael Joos , Benjamin Breiholz , Emma Marmasse , Anna Friederike Köhler , Ponraj Vijayan , Tobias Huber-Loyola , Sven Höfling
show 3 more authors
Michael Jetter Simone Luca Portalupi Peter Michler
This is my paper
classification quant-phcond-mat.otherphysics.optics
keywords quantumdotstelecomC-bandentangledphotonpairssingle-photonsourcekeydistributiondeployedfibertransportablesetupssemiconductorlightsources
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper demonstrates a practical, rack-based unit that houses a semiconductor quantum dot emitting at telecom C-band, along with its excitation laser, filtering optics, and fiber-coupling stages, so that single photons and polarization-entangled photon pairs come out of standard single-mode fibers. The authors aim to show that quantum dot sources – previously confined to stable laboratory tables – can be transported, run remotely, and connected to existing fiber infrastructure, while retaining state-of-the-art performance: fiber-coupled entangled-photon coincidence rates of 201±13 kcps, entanglement fidelity up to 0.964, and single-photon purity with g2(0) as low as 0.009. They also report above 50% collection-plus-setup transmission for both exciton and biexciton photons, and demonstrate the source's field potential by sending single photons through a 35.8-km deployed metropolitan fiber loop with g2(0)=0.036 after transmission. If correct, this removes a major practical obstacle to deploying deterministic quantum light sources in real quantum communication networks.

What carries the argument

The enabling mechanism is a three-floor optical design inside the rack: an excitation floor that combines white-light stabilization, above-band cw laser, and a tunable pulsed Er-doped fiber laser for quasi- to fully resonant excitation; a cryostat floor with a non-polarizing 99:1 beam splitter and a 4 K closed-cycle cryostat; and a collection floor built from polarization-independent volume Bragg gratings, angle-tunable etalons, low-group-delay-dispersion mirrors, and motorized QWP-HWP-QWP wave plates. The wave-plate chains perform both polarization compensation and quantum state tomography, and the polarization-insensitive filtering chain is what allows the entangled two-photon state to sur

What would settle it

Measure the two-photon density matrix and entanglement fidelity directly with the source fully mounted in the rack (rather than citing the table-top value from the companion paper). If the measured fidelity drops significantly below 0.964, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a compact, transportable, remotely operable rack can host a 4 K quantum dot source and deliver its photons to single-mode fibers without sacrificing the source's benchmark performance. Using a telecom InAs/GaAs quantum dot with a metamorphic buffer and planar cavity, the authors achieve fiber-coupled single-photon count rates up to 1.3 Mcps (single-photon mode) and, for the entangled-pair source, a coincidence rate of 201±13 kcps with entanglement fidelity 0.964 and g2(0) values of 0.009–0.015. The rack preserves more than 50% end-to-end transmission for both exciton and biexciton photons, and maintains single-photon purity after a 35.8-km deployed fiber transmissio

Load-bearing premise

The claim that rack integration does not impair the source relies on the assumption that the beam splitters, gratings, etalons, and mirrors inside the rack introduce no polarization-dependent loss or phase shifts that the motorized wave plates cannot compensate, so that the entanglement fidelity measured on the table top (0.964) is preserved in the rack.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Quantum dot sources can be deployed outside specialized laboratories, since the rack contains all required infrastructure and only needs a standard power outlet.
  • Existing telecom fiber networks can be directly interfaced: the source outputs into single-mode fibers and the authors demonstrated single-photon transmission over a 35.8-km deployed metropolitan loop.
  • The high coincidence rate (201 kcps) and fidelity (0.964) establish that transportable sources need not trade off performance for mobility.
  • The simulated BBM92 secure key rate exceeding previous quantum-dot entanglement QKD results suggests that rack-based QD sources are viable for long-distance entanglement-based key distribution.
  • Remote control of all active elements means field deployments can be operated and recalibrated from a central location, reducing the operational burden of quantum networks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the rack's polarization-compensation chain fully corrects the fiber and optics-induced transformations in real installations, then the same packaging could be extended to other polarization-encoded quantum protocols, not just BBM92.
  • The reported >65% transmission after detector correction suggests that with further integration – e.g., replacing free-space filtering with on-chip or all-fiber filters – end-to-end efficiencies could approach the cryostat-collection limit, making quantum-dot sources competitive with parametric down-conversion in brightness.
  • A direct next test would be to run the entangled-pair source itself through a deployed fiber loop with quantum state tomography at the far end; the paper demonstrates single-photon transmission but only simulates the entangled QKD rate.
  • The fact that the 0.964 fidelity is taken from the companion table-top study, while the rack measurements focus on count rates and purity, means the rack's full entanglement preservation is an extrapolation until in-rack tomography is reported.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes a compact, transportable, rack-mounted setup for operating a telecom C-band InAs/GaAs quantum dot as a source of single photons and polarization-entangled photon pairs. The system integrates a closed-cycle cryostat, pulsed laser excitation, spectral filtering via volume Bragg gratings and etalons, polarization control, and fiber coupling in a wheeled rack, with remote control of all active elements. The authors report single-photon operation under LA-phonon-assisted excitation (g(2)(0)=0.031–0.056, count rate 1.3 Mcps), generation of entangled photon pairs under resonant two-photon excitation with an entanglement fidelity of 0.964 and coincidence rate of 201±13 kcps (values attributed to Ref. [15]), transmission of single photons through a 35.8 km deployed fiber link, and a simulated BBM92 secure key rate of 4.2 cps at 175 km. The central claims are that the rack preserves source performance and that the optical path transmission is above 50% (abstract) or exceeds 65% (conclusion).

Significance. If fully supported, the work would be a valuable engineering milestone: it would show that high-performance telecom C-band QD sources can be operated in a transportable, remotely controllable unit and interfaced with deployed fiber infrastructure. The strengths are the detailed description of the rack optomechanics, the demonstration of remote-controllable filtering and polarization compensation, the preserved single-photon purity after 35.8 km transmission, and a simulation-based SKR estimate that uses independently measured source parameters rather than fitting to the target quantity. However, the two most prominent quantitative claims — preservation of entanglement inside the rack and >50%/65% optical transmission — are not backed by experiments presented in this manuscript. The paper would be much stronger if it reported in-rack quantum state tomography and a direct transmission measurement with uncertainties.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III B / Fig. 3 d,e] The entanglement fidelity 0.964 and the reconstructed density matrix in Fig. 3(d,e) are presented as the demonstration of entangled-photon emission, but they are explicitly attributed to Ref. [15], not to a measurement performed with the source inside the rack. The rack's collection path (Sec. II C) includes a 99:1 non-polarising beam splitter, four volume Bragg gratings, two angle-tunable etalons and low-GDD mirrors; each can in principle introduce polarization-dependent loss or phase that would degrade the two-photon density matrix. Since the abstract claims this rack is a source of entangled photons, please either report QST (with fidelity and coincidence rate) measured on the rack-integrated unit, or explicitly state that Fig. 3(d,e) was obtained in the rack. Without this, the central 'entanglement preserved in transportable rack' claim is unsupported.
  2. [Abstract / Conclusion] The transmission claim is inconsistent and unsupported. The abstract states 'above 50% transmission for both exciton and biexciton photons,' while the conclusion states the efficiency 'exceeds 65% after correcting for the detector efficiency.' No protocol, plot, or uncertainty is provided for either number in the main text or figures. Please present the actual end-to-end transmission measurement (e.g., power at the fiber output versus power at the cryostat input, separately for X and XX, with error bars and a definition of what 'transmission' includes) and reconcile the 50% and 65% values.
  3. [Sec. III B] The headline 'record coincidence rate for entangled photon emission in the telecom C-band' (abstract) is based on 201±13 kcps from Ref. [15]; the manuscript does not report a coincidence rate measured with QD-TPE inside the rack. The paper's contribution is the rack integration, so the relevant claim is whether this rate is preserved in the rack. Please provide the in-rack fiber-coupled coincidence rate and entanglement fidelity, or state explicitly that the quoted values were not re-measured after integration. If they were re-measured, the comparison to Ref. [15] should be shown.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 4 caption / Sec. III C] The main text states the deployed fiber loop has 'overall transmission loss of 18 dB,' while the Fig. 4 caption gives 'propagation loss of 14.4 dB.' Clarify whether connector and splice losses are included in the 18 dB figure.
  2. [Abstract / Sec. IV] The abstract states 'above 50% transmission' and the conclusion says 'exceeds 65% after correcting for the detector efficiency.' This numerical discrepancy should be resolved and the measurement basis given.
  3. [Sec. II A / Sec. III B] The text uses both 'white-light illumination' and 'two-colour illumination' to describe the charge-stabilisation light. Specify whether these refer to the same source or to two different mechanisms.
  4. [Sec. III A / III B] The phrases 'active for 60.9% of the time' and 'optically active for 81% of the time' are used without defining the active-time metric. Please state how blinking/active fraction was measured.
  5. [General] The paper cites 'Supplementary Information' for several results (white-light intensity optimisation, blinking, coherent-state preparation), but no supplementary material appears in the arXiv submission. Please ensure the supplementary file is included.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the central rack-integration claim is supported by new hardware and measurements, and the SKR is a forward calculation from independent inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The central claim—that a telecom C-band QD source can be operated inside a rack-based transportable unit with >50% transmission—rests on the new setup described in Sec. II and on in-rack measurements for QD-LA (e.g., 1.3 Mcps fiber-coupled count rate and g2(0)=0.056±0.007). The record coincidence rate, fidelity, and count rates for QD-TPE are attributed to Ref [15], a separate publication by overlapping authors. This is self-citation, but it is used as an externally reported benchmark, not as a fitted parameter or as a derivation from which the current rack claim is deduced. The BBM92 SKR calculation uses measured time-resolved density matrices and coincidence rates as inputs and applies a standard protocol formula; the predicted SKR is not equal to its inputs by construction. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or redefinition is invoked. The main concerns are evidential rather than circular: the entanglement fidelity is not explicitly re-measured after installation in the rack, and the >50% transmission figure is not directly shown. These would be verification gaps, not circularity, and therefore do not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated; the paper introduces an engineered assembly of existing components. The free parameters listed are experimental tuning choices and a simulation optimization, not fundamental constants. The axioms are standard domain assumptions in QD-based quantum communication experiments.

free parameters (2)
  • Coincidence time window in SKR simulation = optimized per distance; values not reported
    The secure key rate is maximized by optimizing the coincidence time window for each communication distance (Sec. III C: 'the coincidence time window was optimised to maximise the SKR'). The optimized values are not reported.
  • White-light illumination intensity (two-colour) = not given
    In Sec. III B, the white-light intensity 'was optimised to minimise emitter blinking and thereby maximise the detected photon count rate'; no value or independent metric is given.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Detector-efficiency and tomography-efficiency corrections accurately convert measured counts to fiber-coupled source rates (Sec. III B: 'After correcting for efficiencies of detection and the quantum tomography setup...').
    The reported count rates and derived efficiencies assume the correction factors are accurate and non-drifting during the measurement.
  • domain assumption The BBM92 secure-key-rate formula from Schimpf et al. [26] is valid for the measured time-resolved density matrices and for the assumed detectors (efficiency 0.8) and fiber loss 0.21 dB/km; the optimization of coincidence windows is compliant with the security proof (Sec. III C).
    The entire SKR prediction rests on this external security analysis and on the chosen channel parameters.
  • domain assumption The deployed fiber link preserves single-photon purity; no decoherence or background contribution beyond what is measured in g(2)(0)=0.036±0.006 (Sec. III C).
    The field-test conclusion treats the measured g2 after transmission as evidence that the fiber link did not degrade the source's single-photon character.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rack-integrated quantum dot-based source of single and entangled photons at telecom C-band." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4MYRB4RU

@misc{pith2026260721454,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rack-integrated quantum dot-based source of single and entangled photons at telecom C-band},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4MYRB4RU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.21454}
}
abstract

For quantum light sources in everyday telecommunication networks, quantum science needs to be fully transformed into quantum technology. The first necessary step to move outside a well-controlled lab environment requires the use of quantum light sources operating in the technologically relevant telecom O- and C-band. This can be provided using epitaxial quantum dots as deterministic sources of quantum light. Particularly intriguing is that emitters operating at telecom wavelengths are rapidly catching up with their short wavelength counterparts in terms of performances. Here, we make a decisive step forward in the development of quantum communication networks: a state-of-the-art source of quantum light, a semiconductor quantum dot (QD), with record coincidence rate for entangled photon emission in the telecom C-band, is operated inside an optimized rack-based setup. This setup includes a tunable pulsed laser for the QD excitation (from quasi- to fully resonant excitation), all optics for the excitation filtering, and QD signal coupling into single-mode fibers. Overall, the setup allows for above $50\%$ transmission for both exciton and biexciton photons. These results show that quantum dots-based telecom light sources can now be transported and integrated into existing fiber infrastructures, an important step to demonstrate the feasibility of the upcoming quantum internet.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21454 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Image and sketch of the transportable source. In the blue block a picture of the overall setup with description of each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. a) Spectrum of one selected quantum dot under LA-phonon assisted excitation. As the laser is fully suppressed by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. a) Spectrum of one selected quantum dot under TPE excitation. As the laser is fully suppressed by the spectral filtering, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. a) Deployed metropolitan optical fiber link in Stuttgart, Germany, connecting the research laboratory of the Institut [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [15]

    R. Joos, M. Helal, M. Vyvleˇ cka, L. Engel, A. Javali, B. Breiholz, P. Vijayan, J. Michl, M. Jetter, S. H¨ ofling, T. Huber-Loyola, G. Peniakov, S. L. Portalupi, and P. Michler, Telecom c-band source of triggered polarization-entangled photon pairs combining high co- incidence rates, fidelities and single-photon purity, Ad- vanced Quantum Technologies9, 1...

    work page doi:10.1002/qute.70317 2026

  2. [1]

    Wehner, D

    S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Quantum in- ternet: A vision for the road ahead, Science362, 10.1126/science.aam9288 (2018)

    doi:10.1126/science.aam9288 2018

  3. [2]

    Michler and S

    P. Michler and S. L. Portalupi,Semiconductor Quantum Light Sources(De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston, 2024)

    2024

  4. [3]

    B¨ ockler, S

    C. B¨ ockler, S. Reitzenstein, C. Kistner, R. Debusmann, A. L¨ offler, T. Kida, S. H¨ ofling, A. Forchel, L. Grenouillet, J. Claudon, and J. M. G´ erard, Electrically driven high-q quantum dot-micropillar cavities, Applied Physics Let- ters92, 091107 (2008)

    2008

  5. [4]

    Sartison, S

    M. Sartison, S. Seyfferle, S. Kolatschek, S. Hepp, M. Jet- ter, P. Michler, and S. L. Portalupi, Single-photon light- emitting diodes based on preselected quantum dots using a deterministic lithography technique, Applied Physics Letters114, 222101 (2019). 8

    2019

  6. [5]

    Shooter, Z.-H

    G. Shooter, Z.-H. Xiang, J. R. A. M¨ uller, J. Skiba- Szymanska, J. Huwer, J. Griffiths, T. Mitchell, M. Ander- son, T. M¨ uller, A. B. Krysa, R. M. Stevenson, J. Heffer- nan, D. A. Ritchie, and A. J. Shields, 1ghz clocked distri- bution of electrically generated entangled photon pairs, Optics Express28, 36838 (2020)

    2020

  7. [6]

    Ding, Y.-P

    X. Ding, Y.-P. Guo, M.-C. Xu, R.-Z. Liu, G.-Y. Zou, J.- Y. Zhao, Z.-X. Ge, Q.-H. Zhang, H.-L. Liu, L.-J. Wang, M.-C. Chen, H. Wang, Y.-M. He, Y.-H. Huo, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, High-efficiency single-photon source above the loss-tolerant threshold for efficient linear opti- cal quantum computing, Nature Photonics19, 387–391 (2025)

    2025

  8. [7]

    Schlehahn, S

    A. Schlehahn, S. Fischbach, R. Schmidt, A. Kaganskiy, A. Strittmatter, S. Rodt, T. Heindel, and S. Reitzen- stein, A stand-alone fiber-coupled single-photon source, Scientific Reports8, 1 (2018)

    2018

Show all 28 references
  1. [8]

    Carmesin, F

    C. Carmesin, F. Olbrich, T. Mehrtens, M. Florian, S. Michael, S. Schreier, C. Nawrath, M. Paul, J. H¨ oschele, B. Gerken, J. Kettler, S. L. Portalupi, M. Jetter, P. Mich- ler, A. Rosenauer, and F. Jahnke, Structural and opti- cal properties of inas/(in)gaas/gaas quantum dots w...

    2018 doi

  2. [9]

    Nawrath, R

    C. Nawrath, R. Joos, S. Kolatschek, S. Bauer, P. Pruy, F. Hornung, J. Fischer, J. Huang, P. Vijayan, R. Sit- tig, M. Jetter, S. L. Portalupi, and P. Michler, Bright source of purcell-enhanced, triggered, single photons in the telecom c-band, Advanced Quantum Technologies6, 230...

    2023

  3. [10]

    Y. G. Zena, M. Langer, A. Rahimi, A. Dhurjati, P. Ruchka, S. Jakovljevic, M. Pal, F. H. P. Fitzek, H. Giessen, J. Czarske, R. Bassoli, and C. Hopfmann, Compact system development of efficient quantum- entangled photon sources towards deployable and indus- trial devices (2026)

    2026

  4. [11]

    H. S. Nguyen, G. Sallen, C. Voisin, P. Roussignol, C. Diederichs, and G. Cassabois, Optically gated reso- nant emission of single quantum dots, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 057401 (2012)

    2012

  5. [12]

    Michler, ed.,Quantum Dots for Quantum Information Technologies(Springer International Publishing, 2017)

    P. Michler, ed.,Quantum Dots for Quantum Information Technologies(Springer International Publishing, 2017)

    2017

  6. [13]

    Reindl, K

    M. Reindl, K. D. J¨ ons, D. Huber, C. Schimpf, Y. Huo, V. Zwiller, A. Rastelli, and R. Trotta, Phonon-assisted two-photon interference from remote quantum emitters, Nano Letters17, 4090–4095 (2017)

    2017

  7. [14]

    Sittig, C

    R. Sittig, C. Nawrath, S. Kolatschek, S. Bauer, R. Sch- aber, J. Huang, P. Vijayan, P. Pruy, S. L. Portalupi, M. Jetter, and P. Michler, Thin-film ingaas metamorphic buffer for telecom c-band inas quantum dots and opti- cal resonators on gaas platform, Nanophotonics11, 1109 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    S. E. Thomas, M. Billard, N. Coste, S. C. Wein, Priya, H. Ollivier, O. Krebs, L. Taza ¨ ırt, A. Harouri, A. Lemaitre, I. Sagnes, C. Anton, L. Lanco, N. Somaschi, J. C. Loredo, and P. Senellart, Bright polarized single- photon source based on a linear dipole, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1...

    2021

  9. [17]

    Cosacchi, F

    M. Cosacchi, F. Ungar, M. Cygorek, A. Vagov, and V. M. Axt, Emission-frequency separated high quality single- photon sources enabled by phonons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 017403 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    Vyvlecka, L

    M. Vyvlecka, L. Jehle, C. Nawrath, F. Giorgino, M. Bozzio, R. Sittig, M. Jetter, S. L. Portalupi, P. Mich- ler, and P. Walther, Robust excitation of C-band quan- tum dots for quantum communication, Applied Physics Letters123, 174001 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Jehle, L

    L. Jehle, L. M. Hansen, P. I. Sund, T. W. Sandø, R. Joos, M. Jetter, S. L. Portalupi, M. Bozzio, P. Michler, and P. Walther, Asymmetric two-photon response of an in- coherently driven quantum emitter, Nature Communica- tions 10.1038/s41467-026-72706-z (2026)

    2026 doi

  12. [20]

    M¨ uller, S

    M. M¨ uller, S. Bounouar, K. D. J¨ ons, M. Gl¨ assl, and P. Michler, On-demand generation of indistinguishable polarization-entangled photon pairs, Nat. Photonics8, 224 (2014)

    2014

  13. [21]

    Hanschke, K

    L. Hanschke, K. A. Fischer, S. Appel, D. Lukin, J. Wierzbowski, S. Sun, R. Trivedi, J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, J. J. Fin- ley, and K. M¨ uller, Quantum dot single-photon sources with ultra-low multi-photon probability, npj Quantum Inf.4, 10.1038/s41534-018-0092-0 (2018)

    2018 doi

  14. [22]

    Bozzio, M

    M. Bozzio, M. Vyvlecka, M. Cosacchi, C. Nawrath, T. Seidelmann, J. C. Loredo, S. L. Portalupi, V. M. Axt, P. Michler, and P. Walther, Enhancing quantum cryp- tography with quantum dot single-photon sources, npj Quantum Inf.8, 104 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Strobel, S

    T. Strobel, S. Kazmaier, T. Bauer, M. Sch¨ afer, A. Choud- hary, N. Lal Sharma, R. Joos, C. Nawrath, J. H. We- ber, W. Nie,et al., High-fidelity distribution of trig- gered polarization-entangled telecom photons via a 36 km intra-city fiber network, Optica Quantum2, 274 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    F. Xu, X. Ma, Q. Zhang, H.-K. Lo, and J.-W. Pan, Se- cure quantum key distribution with realistic devices, Rev. Mod. Phys.92, 025002 (2020)

    2020

  17. [25]

    C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, and N. D. Mermin, Quan- tum cryptography without bell’s theorem, Physical Re- view Letters68, 557–559 (1992)

    1992

  18. [26]

    Schimpf, M

    C. Schimpf, M. Reindl, D. Huber, B. Lehner, S. F. Covre Da Silva, S. Manna, M. Vyvlecka, P. Walther, and A. Rastelli, Quantum cryptography with highly entan- gled photons from semiconductor quantum dots, Science Advances7, 10.1126/sciadv.abe8905 (2021)

    2021 doi

  19. [27]

    Basso Basset and R

    F. Basso Basset and R. Trotta, Quantum dots for entanglement-based quantum key distribution, Applied Physics Reviews13, 10.1063/5.0293657 (2026)

    2026 doi

  20. [28]

    R. Joos, S. Bauer, C. Rupp, S. Kolatschek, W. Fis- cher, C. Nawrath, P. Vijayan, R. Sittig, M. Jetter, S. L. Portalupi, and P. Michler, Coherently and Incoherently Pumped Telecom C-Band Single-Photon Source with High Brightness and Indistinguishability, Nano Letters 24, 8626 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.