Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Effective Large Language Model Adaptation for Improved Grounding and Citation Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.09533 v3 pith:4MZXWA32 submitted 2023-11-16 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords llmsresponsescitationsgroundingadaptationframeworklanguageaccurate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable advancements in natural language understanding and generation. However, one major issue towards their widespread deployment in the real world is that they can generate "hallucinated" answers that are not factual. Towards this end, this paper focuses on improving LLMs by grounding their responses in retrieved passages and by providing citations. We propose a new framework, AGREE, Adaptation for GRounding EnhancEment, that improves the grounding from a holistic perspective. Our framework tunes LLMs to selfground the claims in their responses and provide accurate citations to retrieved documents. This tuning on top of the pre-trained LLMs requires well-grounded responses (with citations) for paired queries, for which we introduce a method that can automatically construct such data from unlabeled queries. The selfgrounding capability of tuned LLMs further grants them a test-time adaptation (TTA) capability that can actively retrieve passages to support the claims that have not been grounded, which iteratively improves the responses of LLMs. Across five datasets and two LLMs, our results show that the proposed tuningbased AGREE framework generates superior grounded responses with more accurate citations compared to prompting-based approaches and post-hoc citing-based approaches

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Lessons from Training Grounded LLMs with Verifiable Rewards

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A two-stage GRPO reward scheme improves citation-grounded answering and refusal in RAG models, with reasoning models benefiting more than instruction-tuned ones.

  2. ChartLens: Fine-grained Visual Attribution in Charts

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ChartLens uses segmentation and set-of-marks prompting to attribute chart-based answers to specific visual elements, and the authors release a new benchmark for evaluating such attribution.

  3. LCDS: A Logic-Controlled Discharge Summary Generation System Supporting Source Attribution and Expert Review

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A logic-controlled pipeline with source mapping and sentence-level attribution generates discharge summaries that score higher than a GPT-4o chain-of-thought baseline in this study.

Pith tools