Magnetic and phonon-induced effects on the non-Markovian dynamics of a single solid-state defect

Ariel Norambuena; Daniel Castillo; Diego Tancara; Vicente Chomal\'i-Castro

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 57 references

Magnetic and phonon-induced effects on the non-Markovian dynamics of a single solid-state defect

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Phonons can make a silicon-vacancy center in diamond non-Markovian, with single-mode memory scaling set by coupling and phonon number and structured-bath memory confined to temperatures below about 1.5 K.

desk verdict A useful qualitative map of phonon-induced memory effects in SiV- centers, but the quantitative structured-bath claims need an unspecified width parameter and fitted constants before they can be called predictions. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.09825 v1 pith:4N7J4PYK submitted 2024-11-14 quant-ph

Ariel Norambuena , Diego Tancara , Vicente Chomalí-Castro , Daniel Castillo This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-ph

keywords silicon-vacancycenternon-MarkoviandynamicstracedistanceBLPmeasureelectron-phononinteractionstructuredphononbathquantumRabimodeldiamonddefect

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the electron-phonon interaction alone can turn a negatively charged silicon-vacancy (SiV$^-$) center in diamond into a non-Markovian open quantum system, meaning information lost to lattice vibrations can flow back into the defect. For a single resonant phonon mode at the defect's energy gap, the trace distance to the steady state oscillates, and the dynamical non-Markovianity grows linearly with the phonon coupling and as the square root of the phonon occupation number. For a structured phonon bath with a Lorentzian resonance at the same frequency, the BLP (information-backflow) measure is nonzero only below about 1.5 K and follows a $\tanh$ law in inverse temperature. The paper identifies longitudinal and transverse magnetic fields, phonon coupling strength, Fock states, and temperature as the knobs that switch these memory effects on and off. The value of establishing this is concrete: it gives a specific solid-state platform where phonon-induced memory effects can be sought, controlled, and possibly exploited.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on three objects. First, an effective quantum Rabi model in the two-level subspaces selected by a longitudinal magnetic field, whose rotating-wave version gives closed equations for the trace distance and the scaling law. Second, the trace-distance measure $D(t)=\frac{1}{2}\|\rho_s(t)-\rho_{SS}\|$ and its integral $N_D$ over revivals, together with the BLP measure for the four-level and transverse-field cases. Third, for the structured bath, the phenomenological spectral density $J(\omega)=J_0\frac{\omega^3}{(\omega/\Delta)^2+1}\frac{\Gamma/2}{(\omega-\Delta)^2+(\Gamma/2)^2}$ with $J_0=4.55\Delta$, inserted into a time-local master equation whose rates depend on temperature through the Bose-Einstein occupation; localized phonon modes near 50 GHz computed for a diamond phononic crystal with circular holes motivate the resonance peak in $J(\omega)$.

What would settle it

Measure the BLP information-backflow of a single SiV$^-$ center in a phononic crystal with a localized mode near 50 GHz as a function of temperature; the model predicts nonzero non-Markovianity only below about 1.5 K, following $N_{\mathrm{BLP}}\approx a\tanh(b/T)+c$. Observing memory effects above 1.5 K, or none at base temperature, would refute the structured-bath claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery the authors argue for is that a single resonant phonon mode and a structured phonon environment both produce genuine memory effects in the dynamics of a SiV$^-$ center in diamond. In the longitudinal-field case the reduced dynamics becomes an effective Rabi model, and the resonant condition $\omega_{\mathrm{ph}}=\Delta\approx 2\pi\times 50$ GHz makes the trace distance $D(t)$ oscillate rather than decay monotonically; the resulting non-Markovianity follows $N_D \propto |g|\sqrt{n+1}$, and in the many-phonon mean-field regime $N_D \propto \sqrt{\langle c^{\dagger} c\rangle}$. When a transverse magnetic field is included, the system becomes four-level and the BLP measure shows a rich pattern in the $(B_x,B_z)$ plane, including a ring feature near $\sqrt{B_x^2+B_z^2}\approx 100$ T that is traced to a polaritonic resonance of the full defect-phonon Hamiltonian. For a structured bath modeled by a Lorentzian spectral density centered at $\Delta$, the BLP non-Markovianity is nonzero only below about 1.5 K and is well fitted by $N_{\mathrm{BLP}}\approx a\tanh(b/T)+c$.

Load-bearing premise

The structured-bath predictions stand on a hand-picked spectral density with a never-specified width, so a different real phonon spectrum would shift or erase the 1.5 K threshold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A resonant single phonon mode at the SiV$^-$ energy gap turns on oscillations in the trace distance, so the non-Markovian response is switched by detuning: resonant $\omega_{\mathrm{ph}}=\omega_s$ gives memory, off-resonant gives Markovian decay.
The dynamical non-Markovianity grows as $|g|\sqrt{n+1}$, so stronger defect-phonon coupling and higher initial phonon Fock number make the memory effect larger, while higher temperature suppresses it.
With a large coherent phonon amplitude the measure scales as $\sqrt{\langle c^{\dagger} c\rangle}$, which extends the Fock-state result and is testable in a mean-field drive.
For a structured phonon bath with a localized mode at $\Delta$, information backflow exists only below roughly 1.5 K, narrowing the experimental window for observing phonon-induced memory.
Adding a transverse magnetic field changes the four-level spectrum and produces a non-Markovianity map with resonance features, including a ring near $\sqrt{B_x^2+B_z^2}\approx 100$ T.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper, the 1.5 K threshold should be sensitive to the width $\Gamma$ of the spectral density, so tuning the phononic crystal geometry to shift or broaden the localized mode would move the threshold; this is a direct testable consequence of the model's structure.
Beyond the paper, inhomogeneous strain broadening across a SiV ensemble would likely wash out the backflow signal, meaning the cleanest experimental test would use a single defect rather than an ensemble.
Beyond the paper, the $\tanh(b/T)$ temperature law is generic for a Lorentzian resonance with thermal occupation, so the same functional form should appear in other color-center-phonon systems, and deviations from it would signal a different spectral shape.
Beyond the paper, the ring feature near 100 T suggests an avoided crossing between the phonon mode and defect polaritons, which could be probed directly by spectroscopy at that magnetic field strength.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a solid extension of the authors' earlier work (Refs. 28, 48) that gives concrete, physically sensible conditions for phonon-induced non-Markovianity in SiV- centers: resonance at the ~50 GHz gap, low temperature, and magnetic-field-tunable features. The single-mode analysis is the strongest part—the effective Rabi mapping for longitudinal fields is clean, and the approximate trace-distance formula (Eq. 18) is a genuine derivation, not just a fit, even though it overshoots the numerics by ~35%. The Bx–Bz BLP map with the ~100 T ring is new and the connection to polaritonic resonances is a nice insight.

The soft spots are concentrated in the structured-bath section. The phenomenological J(ω) in Eq. (32) has a width Γ that is never specified; changing it will change the memory time and amplitude of the rates, so the 1.5 K threshold in Fig. 6 is not a robust prediction as stated. The FEM modes in Fig. 5 are only motivational—there is no projection of those strain profiles onto J1(ω) and J2(ω), so the link between the geometry and the spectral density is missing. Also, both central scaling laws (ND = a|α(0)| and NBLP = a tanh(b/T)+c) have fitted coefficients; the tanh form is physically motivated, but the negative c in Fig. 6 is odd for a measure that should vanish, and it highlights that this is an empirical curve, not a parameter-free derivation. The BLP optimization is also restricted to product initial states, so the reported values are lower bounds, though that is a minor caveat for a four-level system.

None of this kills the central claim—phonons can induce memory effects in this platform and the conditions for doing so are plausible. But the paper would be much stronger if the authors specified Γ, showed how the FEM modes map onto the spectral density, or at minimum discussed the sensitivity of the 1.5 K threshold to Γ and the fit. Code or data release would also help; the 36-hour BLP computation is described in detail but not reproducible from the text alone.

This deserves a serious referee—it is a legitimate extension with a real analytical component and a clear experimental target. I would send it to review, but with the expectation of major revision on the structured-bath section. I wouldn't cite it for the quantitative thresholds until Γ and the fit are sorted; I would cite it for the qualitative map.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies non-Markovian dynamics of a negatively charged silicon-vacancy center coupled to phonons. It models a single-mode environment via a Rabi model, derives an approximate analytical expression for the dynamical non-Markovianity measure ND (Eq. (18)), and numerically studies dependence on longitudinal/transverse magnetic fields, Fock-state number, and temperature. It then treats a structured phonon bath with a phenomenological Lorentzian spectral density (Eq. (32)), supported by a finite-element calculation of localized modes in a diamond phononic crystal, and computes the Breuer-Laine-Piilo measure NBLP as a function of temperature (Fig. 6), finding non-Markovianity only below about 1.5 K.

Significance. If the structured-bath predictions were quantitatively grounded, the paper would be significant: it identifies concrete physical conditions (resonant phonon mode, low temperature, magnetic-field tuning) for observing phonon-induced memory effects in a practical color-center platform, and it connects an FEM phonon-mode calculation to an open-system master equation. The single-mode analysis contains a useful approximate analytical formula, and the BLP optimization over initial states in Fig. 4 is computationally demanding and clearly described. The main limitation is that the structured-bath central quantitative claim depends on an unspecified width Γ in the spectral density and on a fitted temperature law, so the reported 1.5 K threshold is not yet a robust prediction.

major comments (3)

[IV.A, Eq. (32), Fig. 6] The structured-bath calculation is not reproducible as stated: the Lorentzian width Γ in Eq. (32) is never given a numerical value, while the time-dependent rates in Eqs. (B12)-(B19), and hence NBLP(T), depend directly on Γ. The FEM modes in Fig. 5 are presented as motivation, but no projection of those modes onto J1(ω) and J2(ω) (Eqs. (28)-(29)) is performed, so the line shape and amplitude are not tied to the phononic-crystal geometry; the only stated constraint Σ|g|² ≈ (1−10)Δ² fixes an integrated intensity, not the spectral shape. The manuscript should specify Γ, derive or justify the line shape from the computed modes or experimental data, and show how the 1.5 K threshold varies with Γ.
[Fig. 6 and surrounding text in IV.B] The temperature law NBLP = a tanh(b/T) + c is presented as the main structured-bath result, but a, b, and c are fitted, and the best-fit value c = −0.734 ± 0.017 is negative—unphysical for a nonnegative measure that should vanish in the Markovian high-temperature limit. In addition, the stated theoretical motivation has a factor-of-two error: [2N(ω,T)+1] = coth(ℏω/2kBT), so an inverse-rate argument yields tanh(ℏω/2kBT), not tanh(ℏω/kBT). The authors should report the zero-temperature and high-temperature limits of the data, justify the offset, and avoid calling the fitted curve a parameter-free prediction.
[III.A.1, Eq. (18), and Fig. 3] The analytical expression for ND is approximate, and the paper's own check gives ND ≈ 0.98 versus the numerical 1.32, a discrepancy of roughly 25%. Because Eq. (18) is used to infer the central scaling ND ∝ sqrt(n+1)|g|/[2N(Δ)+1], the manuscript should state clearly that the scaling is approximate and test it directly against full numerics rather than through the approximate formula. In the mean-field case, Fig. 3 fits ND = a|α(0)| with a = 0.7898; the scaling exponent is a genuine prediction, but the prefactor a(T) is fitted, so the text should not imply a parameter-free derivation.

minor comments (7)

[III.A.1] The sentence stating that N(Δ) = [exp(Δ/kBT) − 1]⁻¹ decreases with increasing temperature is incorrect; N(Δ) increases with T. The intended conclusion that higher temperature suppresses non-Markovianity still follows because Γ0 grows with N(Δ).
[Fig. 2] The main text sets the initial Fock state to n = 1, while the caption of Fig. 2(b) states n = 0; please reconcile this inconsistency.
[IV.B and Conclusions] The Conclusions state that non-Markovianity exists below 1 K, whereas Section IV.B and Fig. 6 report a threshold near 1.5 K; these numbers should be made consistent.
[III.B] The sentence 'All these scenarios are described by the initial condition presented in Eq. .' has a missing equation number or reference.
[Conclusions] The word 'suing' should be 'using'.
[Fig. 3 inset] The inset showing a(T) has no axis labels or quantitative description; please add them so the temperature dependence of the slope can be assessed.
[Fig. 6] The reported mean square error of 1.4×10⁻³ does not state units or the number of fitted points; a residual plot would be more informative.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the single-mode derivation is self-contained and analytical, and the structured-bath results are explicitly phenomenological simulations with fitted summarizing curves, not predictions equivalent to their inputs.

full rationale

No circular step was found. The single-mode analysis starts from a fixed SiV Hamiltonian and a group-theoretically derived electron-phonon interaction cited to prior work (Ref. [25]); the trace-distance solution in Eq. (17) and the non-Markovianity formula in Eq. (18) are derived from the Lindblad equations in Appendix C and then checked against an independent numerical simulation (ND approx 0.98 versus 1.32, as stated in the text). The mean-field result ND = a|alpha(0)| in Fig. 3 is a linear fit of a proportionality constant, while the sqrt(n) scaling itself comes from the small-coupling limit of Eq. (18); the paper does not present the fitted coefficient as a first-principles prediction. For the structured phonon bath, J(omega) in Eq. (32) is explicitly labeled "phenomenological," with its normalization fixed by a stated Huang-Rhys integral, and the curve NBLP = a tanh(b/T) + c in Fig. 6 is labeled a "fit model" with reported parameters and mean-square error. The agreement between that fit and the numerical BLP data is therefore a curve fit, not a derivation, and it is not used to derive the central claim. The unspecified width Gamma in Eq. (32) is a genuine reproducibility and model-dependence issue that could change the quantitative 1.5 K threshold, but it is an underdetermined input, not a circular reduction. The self-citations to Refs. [25, 28, 48] supply prior interaction models and a previously used spectral-density form; they are not uniqueness theorems and do not already contain the paper's target non-Markovianity results, so the derivation chain retains independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central quantitative claims rely on a phenomenological spectral density (with hand-picked amplitude and unstated width), a restricted initial-state optimization for the BLP measure, and two empirical fits (one for the mean-field scaling, one for the temperature law). These are the main things the reader pays for upstream rather than deriving from first principles.

free parameters (4)

J0 (spectral density amplitude) = 4.55Δ
Chosen by hand in Section IV.A to give a moderate Huang-Rhys factor (1-10)Δ^2; it sets the overall strength of the defect-phonon coupling in the structured-bath simulations and directly affects the BLP values and temperature threshold.
Γ (Lorentzian width in Eq. (32))
The width of the resonant peak in the spectral density is never given in the text; it controls the bath memory time and the magnitude of non-Markovianity, so the numerics are not fully reproducible without guessing it.
a (mean-field scaling constant) = 0.7898 (95% CI 0.7683-0.8112)
Fitted to numerical data in Fig. 3 for ND = a|α(0)|; the linear scaling is predicted, but the constant is empirical.
a, b, c (temperature fit) = a=2.386, b=0.475, c=-0.734
Fitted parameters in NBLP = a tanh(b/T) + c in Fig. 6; the tanh form is motivated by the expected inverse dependence on damping, but these constants are not derived.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Weak-coupling (Born) approximation: the electron-phonon interaction is weak enough that the second-order time-local master equation (30) is valid.
Appendix B derives Eq. (30) from Eq. (B1) assuming weak coupling; however, the structured-bath parameters yield Huang-Rhys factors of 1-10, which may not be in the weak-coupling regime. This is load-bearing for all structured-bath results.
ad hoc to paper The spectral density J(ω) of Eq. (32) (Lorentzian peak plus ω^3 acoustic tail) faithfully represents the structured phonon environment of a SiV- center.
Introduced in Section IV.A as a phenomenological model; it is not derived from the finite-element phonon modes of Fig. 5, and the parameters J0 and Γ are chosen by hand. The temperature and Bx-Bz results depend on this choice.
domain assumption The BLP measure can be evaluated by maximizing only over product pure initial states of the form ρ(0)=ρ_orb⊗ρ_spin (Eq. (24)).
Section III.B restricts the optimization to eight angles; the true BLP measure is a maximum over all initial state pairs. The paper does not prove the maximum lies in this subset, so the reported NBLP is a lower bound.
domain assumption For longitudinal fields the dynamics reduces to a two-level effective Rabi model in H1/H2, and the rotating-wave approximation applies for |g| ≪ ωs.
Section III.A uses this to derive Eq. (18) and the Fock-state scaling; the RWA is justified in the stated regime, but the analytical ND formula is approximate (paper reports 0.98 vs numerical 1.32).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Magnetic and phonon-induced effects on the non-Markovian dynamics of a single solid-state defect." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4N7J4PYK

@misc{pith2026241109825,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Magnetic and phonon-induced effects on the non-Markovian dynamics of a single solid-state defect},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4N7J4PYK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.09825}
}

read the original abstract

The electron-phonon interaction is one of the most fundamental mechanisms in condensed matter physics. Phonons can induce memory effects in solid-state platforms when localized electronic states interact with lattice vibrations in non-unitary dynamical maps. In this work, we demonstrate how single-mode and structured phonon environments can give rise to non-Markovian dynamics of an individual negatively charged silicon-vacancy center in diamond. Using trace distance as a quantifier via numerical simulations and theoretical calculations, we identify the physical conditions for emerging and understanding non-Markovian behavior in diverse scenarios. Most importantly, we investigate the influence of magnetic fields (longitudinal and transverse), phonon couplings, Fock states, and temperature to understand how these factors influence memory effects in this solid-state device.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.09825 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. (a) Dynamical behavior of the trace distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Dynamical non-Markovianity as a function of the initial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (4 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Pattern of the degree of non-Markovianity obtained from the BLP measure ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Numerical calculation of localized phonon modes of frequencies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Degree of non-Markovianity as a function of temperature for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Pattern of the degree of non-Markovianity obtained from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

[1]

As discussed previously, the maximum achievable non-Markovianity is reached for the resonant case ωph = ωs = ∆

Non-Markovianity generated by Fock states Let us suppose that the initial state is given by |Ψ(0)⟩ = |g, n⟩, where |g⟩ is the SiV − ground state and |n⟩ is the phonon Fock state. As discussed previously, the maximum achievable non-Markovianity is reached for the resonant case ωph = ωs = ∆ . In the weak-coupling regime |g| ≪ωs and |g| ≫ΓSiV, γph (which is ...

work page
[2]

In this regime, we can treat the mechanical mode as a classical field with amplitude α(t) = ⟨c(t)⟩

Non-Markovianity in the regime ⟨c†c⟩ ≫1 Let us consider the regime n = ⟨c†c⟩ ≫ 1, where we have a large mean number of phonons. In this regime, we can treat the mechanical mode as a classical field with amplitude α(t) = ⟨c(t)⟩. Based on our previous theoretical analysis, one expects a scaling ND ∝ ⟨c†c⟩1/2 when the mean number of phonons increases. To tes...

work page
[3]

required to write each initial state ρj(0) (j = 1, 2). The problem of estimating the BLP measure, NBLP, is translated into the following constrained nonlinear optimization problem min x L(x), x = (x1, x2) L(x) = − Z ˙D>0 D(ρ1(t, x1), ρ2(t, x2))dt, subject to xlb ≤ x ≤ xub, (25) where the physical constraint over the angles of the Bloch parametrization is ...

work page
[4]

Breuer, E-M

H-P. Breuer, E-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini, Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 021002 (2016)

work page 2016
[5]

H-B. Chen, N. Lambert, Y-C. Cheng, Y-N. Chen, and F. Nori, Using non-Markovian measures to evaluate quantum master equations for photosynthesis, Sci. Rep. 5, 12753 (2015)

work page 2015
[6]

Chiarugi, M

D. Chiarugi, M. Falaschi, D. Hermith, C. Olarte, and L. Torella, Modelling non-Markovian dynamics in biochemical reactions, BMC Syst. Biol. 9 S8 (2015)

work page 2015
[7]

A. W. Chin, S. F. Huelga, M. B. Plenio, Quantum Metrology in Non-Markovian Environments, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 233601 (2012)

work page 2012
[8]

Bylicka, D

B. Bylicka, D. Chruscinski and S. Maniscalco, Non- Markovianity and reservoir memory of quantum channels: a quantum information theory perspective, Sc. Rep. 4, 5720 (2014)

work page 2014

Show all 57 references

[9]

Mirkin, P

N. Mirkin, P. Poggi, and D. Wisniacki, Entangling protocols due to non-Markovian dynamics, Phys. Rev. A 99, 020301(R) (2019)

2019
[10]

D. M. Reich, N. Katz, and C. P. Koch, Exploiting Non- Markovianity for Quantum Control, Sc. Rep. 5, 12430 (2015)

2015
[11]

S. F. Huelga, A. Rivas, and M. B. Plenio, Non-Markovianity- Assisted Steady State Entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 160402 (2012)

2012
[12]

Breuer, E-M

H-P. Breuer, E-M. Laine, and J. Piilo, Measure for the Degree of Non-Markovian Behavior of Quantum Processes in Open Sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 210401 (2009)

2009
[14]

S. Luo, S. Fu, and H. Song, Quantifying non-Markovianity via correlations, Phys. Rev. A 86, 044101 (2012)

2012
[15]

Rivas, S

A. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Entanglement and Non-Markovianity of Quantum Evolutions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 050403 (2010)

2010
[16]

Rivas, S

A. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum non- Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 094001 (2014)

2014
[17]

Naydenov and F

B. Naydenov and F. Jelezco, Single Color Centers in Diamond as Single-Photon Sources and Quantum Sensors, (Springer, 15, 303-318 2014.)

2014
[18]

Beveratos, S

A. Beveratos, S. Khn, R. Brouri, T. Gacoin, J-P. Poizat, and P. Grangier, Room temperature stable single-photon source, Eur. Phys. J. D. 18, 191 (2002)

2002
[19]

C. Wang, C. Kurtsiefer, H. Weinfurter, and B. Burchard, Single photon emission from SiV centres in diamond produced by ion implantation, Journal of Physics B 39, 37 (2005)

2005
[20]

Sipahigil, K

A. Sipahigil, K. D. Jahnke, L. J. Rogers, T. Teraji, J. Isoya, A. S. Zibrov, F. Jelezko, and M. D. Lukin, Indistinguishable Photons from Separated Silicon-Vacancy Centers in Diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 113602 (2014)

2014
[21]

C-C. Fu, H-Y . Lee, K. Chen, T-S. Lim, H-Y . Wu, P-K. Lin, P- K. Wei, P-H. Tsao, H-C. Chang, and W. Fann, Characterization and application of single fluorescent nanodiamonds as cellular 14 biomarkers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.104, 727-732 (2007)

2007
[22]

G. D. Fuchs, G. Burkard, P. V . Klimov, and D. D. Awschalon, A quantum memory intrinsic to single nitrogenvacancy centres in diamond, Nature Physics 7, 789-793 (2011)

2011
[23]

J. R. Maze, P. L. Stanwix, J. S. Hodges, S. Hong, J. M. Taylor, P. Cappellaro, L. Jiang, M. V . Gurudev Dutt, E. Togan, A. S. Zi- brov, A. Yacoby, R. L. Walsworth, and M. D. Lukin, Nanoscale magnetic sensing with an individual electronic spin in diamond, Nature 455, 644-647 (2008)

2008
[24]

J. M. Higbie, J. D. Perreault, V . M. Acosta, C. Belthangady, P. Lebel, M. H. Kim, K. Nguyen, V . Demas, V . Bajaj, and C. Santori, Multiphoton-Excited Fluorescence of Silicon-Vacancy Color Centers in Diamond, Phys. Rev. Applied 7, 054010 (2017)

2017
[25]

A. Ajoy, U. Bissbort, M. D. Lukin, R. L. Walsworth, and P. Cap- pellaro, Atomic-Scale Nuclear Spin Imaging Using Quantum- Assisted Sensors in Diamond, Phys. Rev. X. 5, 011001 (2015)

2015
[26]

P. Rabl, M. V . Cappellaro, G. Dutt, L. Jiang, J. R. Maze, and M. D. Lukin, Strong magnetic coupling between an electronic spin qubit and a mechanical resonator, Phys. Rev. B79, 041302 (2009)

2009
[27]

K. V . Kepesidis, S. D. Bennett, S. Portolan, M. D. Lukin, and P. Rabl, Phonon cooling and lasing with nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Phys. Rev. B 88, 064105 (2013)

2013
[28]

K. V . Kepesidis, M-A. Lemonde, A. Norambuena, J. R. Maze, and P. Rabl, Cooling phonons with phonons: Acoustic reser- voir engineering with silicon-vacancy centers in diamond, Phys. Rev. B 94, 214115 (2016)

2016
[29]

Lemonde, S

M-A. Lemonde, S. Meesala, A. Sipahigil, M. J. A. Schuetz, M. D. Lukin, M. Loncar, and P. Rabl, Phonon Networks with Silicon-Vacancy Centers in Diamond Waveguides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 213603 (2018)

2018
[30]

J. F. Haase, P. J. Vetter, T. Unden, A. Smirne, J. Rosskpf, B. Naydenov, A. Stacey, F. Jelezco, M. B. Plenio, and S. F. Huelga, Controllable Non-Markovianity for a Spin Qubit in Diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 060401 (2018)

2018
[31]

Norambuena, J

A. Norambuena, J. R. Maze, P. Rabl, and R. Coto, Quantifying phonon-induced non-Markovianity in color centers in diamond, Phys. Rev. A 101, 022110 (2020)

2020
[32]

Meesala, Y-I

S. Meesala, Y-I. Sohn, B. Pingault, L. Shao, H. A. Atikian, J. Holzgrafe, M. Gndoan, C. Stavrakas, A. Sipahigil, C. Chia, R. Evans, M. J. Burek, M. Zhang, L. Wu, J. L. Pacheco, J. Abra- ham, E. Bielejec, M. D. Lukin, M. Atatre, and M. Lonar, Strain engineering of the silicon-v...

2018
[33]

Hepp, Electronic Structure of the Silicon Vacancy Color Center in Diamond, PhD thesis, Saarlandes University, (2014)

C. Hepp, Electronic Structure of the Silicon Vacancy Color Center in Diamond, PhD thesis, Saarlandes University, (2014)

2014
[34]

C. Hepp, T. M ¨uller, V . Waselowski, J. N. Becker, B. Pingault, H. Sternschulte, D. Steinm ¨uller-Nethl, A. Gali, J. R. Maze, M. Atat¨ure, and C. Becher, Electronic Structure of the Silicon Va- cancy Color Center in Diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 036405 (2014)

2014
[35]

Hanks, W

M. Hanks, W. J. Munro, and K. Nemoto, Optical manipulation of the negative silicon-vacancy center in diamond, Phys. Rev. A 102, 022616 (2020)

2020
[36]

M. W. Day, K. M. Bates, C. L. Smallwood, R. C. Owen, T. Schrder, E. Bielejec, R. Ulbricht, and S. T. Cundiff, Coher- ent Interactions between Silicon-Vacancy Centers in Diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 203603 (2022)

2022
[37]

Chen, Y-F

J-Q. Chen, Y-F. Qiao, X-L. Dong, X-L. Hei, and P-B. Li, Dissipation-assisted preparation of steady spin-squeezed states of SiV centers, Phys. Rev. A 103, 013709 (2021)

2021
[38]

Bersuker, The Jahn-Teller Effect (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2006)

I. Bersuker, The Jahn-Teller Effect (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2006)

2006
[39]

M ¨akel and M

H. M ¨akel and M. M ¨ott¨onen, Effects of the rotating-wave and secular approximations on non-Markovianity, Phys. Rev. A 88, 052111 (2013)

2013
[40]

P-B. Li, X-X. Li, F. Nori, Band-gap-engineered spin-phonon, and spin-spin interactions with defect centers in diamond cou- pled to phononic crystals, arXiv:1901.04650

1901 arXiv
[41]

J-L. Tang, G. Alvarado Barrios, E. Solano, and F. Albarr ´an- Arriagada, Tunable Non-Markovianity for Bosonic Quantum Memristors, Entropy 25, 756 (2023)

2023
[42]

Q. Xie, H. Zhong, M. T. Batchelor, and C. Lee, The quantum Rabi model: solution and dynamics,Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50 113001 (2017)

2017
[43]

Laine, J

E-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and H-P. Breuer, Measure for the non- Markovianity of quantum processes, Phys. Rev. A 81, 062115 (2010)

2010
[44]

L. Yu, S. Zhu, Q. Liang, G. Chen, and S. Jia, Analytical solu- tions for the Rabi model, Phys. Rev. A 86, 015803 (2012)

2012
[45]

H. J. Mamin, C. T. Rettner, M. H. Sherwood, L. Gao, and D. Rugar, High field-gradient dysprosium tips for magnetic reso- nance force microscopy, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 013102 (2012)

2012
[47]

L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Theory of Elasticity , (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1986.)

1986
[49]

Wilson-Rae and A

I. Wilson-Rae and A. Imamo ˘glu, Quantum dot cavity-QED in the presence of strong electron-phonon interactions, Phys. Rev. B 65, 235311 (2002)

2002
[50]

Norambuena, S

A. Norambuena, S. A. Reyes, J. Mej ´ıa-Lop´ez, A. Gali, and J. R. Maze, Microscopic modeling of the effect of phonons on the optical properties of solid-state emitters, Phys. Rev. B 94, 134305 (2016)

2016
[51]

J Gonzlez, D

F. J Gonzlez, D. Tancara, H. T. Dinani, R. Coto, and A. No- rambuena, Engineering non-Markovianity from defect-phonon interactions, New J. Phys. 25 043004 (2023)

2023
[52]

J. R. Maze, A. Gali, E. Togan, Y . Chu, A. Trifonov, E. Kaxiras, and M. D. Lukin, Properties of nitrogen-vacancy centers in dia- mond: the group theoretic approach , New. J. Phys. 13, 025025 (2011)

2011
[53]

Tinkham, Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics(Mc-Graw Hill, 2003.)

F. Tinkham, Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics(Mc-Graw Hill, 2003.)

2003
[54]

Breuer and F

H. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002)

2002
[55]

J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori. QuTiP: An open- source Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Computer Physics Communications 183, 17601772 (2012)

2012
[56]

J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Com- puter Physics Communications 184, 12341240 (2013)

2013
[57]

Togo and I

A. Togo and I. Tanaka, First principles phonon calculations in materials science, Scripta Materialia, 108, 15 (2015)

2015
[58]

M. C. Kuzyk and H. Wang, Scaling Phononic Quantum Net- works of Solid-State Spins with Closed Mechanical Subsys- tems, Phys. Rev. X 8, 041027 (2018)

2018
[59]

J. Li, Y-T. Chen, Computational Partial Differential Equations Using MATLAB, (CRC Press 2019)

2019
[60]

Das, An Introduction to Finite Element Analysis Using Mat- lab Tools, (Springer Nature Switzerland 2023)

S. Das, An Introduction to Finite Element Analysis Using Mat- lab Tools, (Springer Nature Switzerland 2023)

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

As discussed previously, the maximum achievable non-Markovianity is reached for the resonant case ωph = ωs = ∆

Non-Markovianity generated by Fock states Let us suppose that the initial state is given by |Ψ(0)⟩ = |g, n⟩, where |g⟩ is the SiV − ground state and |n⟩ is the phonon Fock state. As discussed previously, the maximum achievable non-Markovianity is reached for the resonant case ωph = ωs = ∆ . In the weak-coupling regime |g| ≪ωs and |g| ≫ΓSiV, γph (which is ...

work page

[2] [2]

In this regime, we can treat the mechanical mode as a classical field with amplitude α(t) = ⟨c(t)⟩

Non-Markovianity in the regime ⟨c†c⟩ ≫1 Let us consider the regime n = ⟨c†c⟩ ≫ 1, where we have a large mean number of phonons. In this regime, we can treat the mechanical mode as a classical field with amplitude α(t) = ⟨c(t)⟩. Based on our previous theoretical analysis, one expects a scaling ND ∝ ⟨c†c⟩1/2 when the mean number of phonons increases. To tes...

work page

[3] [3]

required to write each initial state ρj(0) (j = 1, 2). The problem of estimating the BLP measure, NBLP, is translated into the following constrained nonlinear optimization problem min x L(x), x = (x1, x2) L(x) = − Z ˙D>0 D(ρ1(t, x1), ρ2(t, x2))dt, subject to xlb ≤ x ≤ xub, (25) where the physical constraint over the angles of the Bloch parametrization is ...

work page

[4] [4]

Breuer, E-M

H-P. Breuer, E-M. Laine, J. Piilo, and B. Vacchini, Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 021002 (2016)

work page 2016

[5] [5]

H-B. Chen, N. Lambert, Y-C. Cheng, Y-N. Chen, and F. Nori, Using non-Markovian measures to evaluate quantum master equations for photosynthesis, Sci. Rep. 5, 12753 (2015)

work page 2015

[6] [6]

Chiarugi, M

D. Chiarugi, M. Falaschi, D. Hermith, C. Olarte, and L. Torella, Modelling non-Markovian dynamics in biochemical reactions, BMC Syst. Biol. 9 S8 (2015)

work page 2015

[7] [7]

A. W. Chin, S. F. Huelga, M. B. Plenio, Quantum Metrology in Non-Markovian Environments, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 233601 (2012)

work page 2012

[8] [8]

Bylicka, D

B. Bylicka, D. Chruscinski and S. Maniscalco, Non- Markovianity and reservoir memory of quantum channels: a quantum information theory perspective, Sc. Rep. 4, 5720 (2014)

work page 2014