No-cloning and superluminal signaling

S.J. van Enk

No-cloning and superluminal signaling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv quant-ph/9803030 v1 pith:4NQXUWYQ submitted 1998-03-13 quant-ph

S.J. van Enk This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-ph

keywords no-cloningsignalingsuperluminalargumentconclusiongivenincorrectleading

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments

read the original abstract

The argument given by M.D. Westmoreland and B. Schumacher in quant-ph/9801014 leading to the purported conclusion that superluminal signaling violates the no-cloning theorem is shown to be incorrect.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Generalized rules for coherence transfer from local to global scale
quant-ph 2019-08 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

A generalization of two-photon interferometry shows local detection probabilities are phase-independent for path-entangled photons, a known effect repackaged as a new principle of 'mutual intolerance'.

Pith tools