Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

UBL: an R package for Utility-based Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1604.08079 v2 pith:4NZZC6V2 submitted 2016-04-27 cs.MS cs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.MScs.LGstat.ML
keywords packageclassificationdomainmethodspredictiveproblemsregressiontasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This document describes the R package UBL that allows the use of several methods for handling utility-based learning problems. Classification and regression problems that assume non-uniform costs and/or benefits pose serious challenges to predictive analytic tasks. In the context of meteorology, finance, medicine, ecology, among many other, specific domain information concerning the preference bias of the users must be taken into account to enhance the models predictive performance. To deal with this problem, a large number of techniques was proposed by the research community for both classification and regression tasks. The main goal of UBL package is to facilitate the utility-based predictive analytic task by providing a set of methods to deal with this type of problems in the R environment. It is a versatile tool that provides mechanisms to handle both regression and classification (binary and multiclass) tasks. Moreover, UBL package allows the user to specify his domain preferences, but it also provides some automatic methods that try to infer those preference bias from the domain, considering some common known settings.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Instance Hardness-Based Relevance for Imbalanced Regression

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An instance-hardness relevance function that labels examples by prediction difficulty improves oversampling for imbalanced regression, with modest empirical gains.

  2. Imbalanced Regression Pipeline Recommendation

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Meta-IR trains meta-classifiers on 218 datasets to recommend a regression model and a resampling strategy from dataset meta-features, with a chained variant that slightly improves F1-scoreR but not SERA.

  3. Resampling strategies for imbalanced regression: a survey and empirical analysis

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Across 30 imbalanced regression datasets, resampling strategies improve most models, with GN, RO, and WERCS most often best, and no universally dominant strategy.

Pith tools