Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Shape-Faithful Graph Drawings

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.14095 v1 pith:4TXC3TML submitted 2022-08-30 cs.DS

Shape-Faithful Graph Drawings

classification cs.DS
keywords drawingsshape-faithfulgraphalgorithmsmetricsproximityshape-basedexperiments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Shape-based metrics measure how faithfully a drawing D represents the structure of a graph G, using the proximity graph S of D. While some limited graph classes admit proximity drawings (i.e., optimally shape-faithful drawings, where S = G), algorithms for shape-faithful drawings of general graphs have not been investigated. In this paper, we present the first study for shape-faithful drawings of general graphs. First, we conduct extensive comparison experiments for popular graph layouts using the shape-based metrics, and examine the properties of highly shape-faithful drawings. Then, we present ShFR and ShSM, algorithms for shape-faithful drawings based on force-directed and stress-based algorithms, by introducing new proximity forces/stress. Experiments show that ShFR and ShSM obtain significant improvement over FR (Fruchterman-Reingold) and SM (Stress Majorization), on average 12% and 35% respectively, on shape-based metrics.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.