Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 36 references

On string theory on (deformed) $AdS_3\times \mathbb{T}^3$

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read At level k=1, the fermionic string on $AdS_3\times \mathcal{N}$ can be decoupled by setting the $\mathbb{Z}_2$-twisted marginal wall to zero, leaving a holographic dual described by the symmetric product $(\mathbb{R}\times…

desk verdict A competent, honest research note that makes the k=1 decoupling limit concrete with explicit winding-one operators, but its central current-algebra identification rests on an OPE it admits it does not derive. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.15929 v1 pith:4ULUP6L6 submitted 2025-07-21 hep-th

Soumangsu Chakraborty , Amit Giveon This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords AdS3/CFT2k=1stringtheorysymmetricproductorbifoldsingle-traceT-Tbardeformationwinding-onevertexoperatorslongstringsdeformedSCFTFZZduality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the fermionic string on $AdS_3\times \mathcal{N}$ at level $k=1$, and its single-trace $T\bar T$ deformation, has a precise holographic description: set the coefficient of the $\mathbb{Z}_2$-twisted marginal wall to zero, and the decoupled theory is the symmetric product $(\mathbb{R}\times \mathcal{N})^p/S_p$. In this limit, the paper identifies winding-one delta-function normalizable worldsheet operators that stand for the local boundary operators: the holomorphic current $\partial_x\phi$, the affine currents $K^a(x)$, the stress tensor $T(x)$, and the single-trace $T\bar T$ and $J\bar T$ operators. That identification matters because it explains how the large chiral algebra of the boundary seed $\mathbb{R}\times \mathcal{N}$ emerges from a bulk theory whose usual non-normalizable operators would seem to be missing. For the $(2,2)$ superstring on (deformed) $AdS_3\times \mathbb{T}^3$, the paper derives concrete momentum-space two-point functions (3.12) and (3.16) as predictions for the $T\bar T$-deformed $\mathbb{R}\times \mathbb{T}^3$ SCFT.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the winding-one vertex operator $\Phi^{w=1,j=1/2}_{h=1}(x,\bar x;z,\bar z)$, defined as the $s\to 0$ limit of delta-function normalizable operators $\Phi^{w=1,j=1/2+is}_{h=1+s^2}$. Its OPE with itself, $\Phi\Phi \sim \delta^2(x_1-x_2)\Phi$, is what forces the winding-one currents (2.8), the stress tensor (2.14), and the single-trace $T\bar T$ and $J\bar T$ operators (2.19), (2.22) to satisfy the standard boundary OPE algebras. FZZ duality, the standard duality between spectrally flowed vertex operators in the $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ WZW model, ties this winding-one sector to the usual winding-zero non-normalizable operators, and in the deformed theory the Fourier-transform step replaces the conformal weight $h$ by $h_{p^2}=h+\alpha'\lambda p^2/4$, producing the two-point functions (3.12) and (3.16).

What would settle it

A direct worldsheet computation of the OPE (2.11) would settle the central claim: if the right-hand side acquires extra singular or nonlocal terms, the winding-one currents will not obey the standard Kac-Moody and Virasoro algebras, and the identification with the $(\mathbb{R}\times \mathbb{T}^3)^p/S_p$ boundary fails. Equally, an independent field-theory computation of the momentum-space two-point functions (3.12) or (3.16) in $T\bar T$-deformed $\mathbb{R}\times \mathbb{T}^3$ that disagrees with the string-theory prediction would falsify the dictionary.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the new $k=1$ string theory is obtained from the usual $AdS_3\times \mathcal{N}$ string by setting the coefficient of the $\mathbb{Z}_2$-twisted marginal wall to zero, which is possible only at $k=1$ because the linear dilaton slope vanishes. The bulk side of the dictionary is then a decoupled theory of delta-function normalizable states with nonzero winding, with positive and negative radial momenta treated as independent. The paper constructs the winding-one representatives of the boundary chiral algebra $\partial_x\phi$, $K^a(x)$, $T(x)$, the single-trace $T\bar T$ operator, and the single-trace $J\bar T$ operator, and shows that $\bar\partial_x\partial_x\phi=0$, so $\partial_x\phi$ is holomorphic, and that the winding-one currents and stress tensor obey the standard boundary OPEs. Under single-trace $T\bar T$ deformation, the same reasoning yields closed-form predictions (3.12) and (3.16) for two-point functions in the $T\bar T$-deformed $\mathbb{R}\times \mathbb{T}^3$ seed, which the paper states are non-trivial predictions from string theory in the absence of an independent field-theory computation.

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction rests on the claim that the winding-one vertex operator's product with itself collapses to a delta function times itself, a step the paper takes from earlier work and FZZ duality while noting that a direct derivation is still missing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The non-normalizable operators of ordinary string theory on $AdS_3$ acquire local representatives in the winding-one delta-function normalizable sector at $k=1$, so the boundary local operator spectrum is accounted for in the decoupled theory.
  • $\partial_x\phi$ becomes exactly holomorphic in the decoupled $k=1$ limit, with $\bar\partial_x\partial_x\phi=0$, matching the free scalar in the $\mathbb{R}$ part of the seed.
  • The winding-one currents and stress tensor obey the standard OPE algebras, so the full chiral algebra of $(\mathbb{R}\times \mathcal{N})^p/S_p$ is visible from the bulk.
  • Equations (3.12) and (3.16) give concrete, testable two-point functions for the $T\bar T$-deformed $\mathbb{R}\times \mathbb{T}^3$ SCFT, normalized to the correct IR current level and central charge.
  • The same limiting procedure extends to general fermionic strings with $c_{\mathcal{N}}=9/2$ and to $T\bar T+J\bar T+T\bar J$ deformations, predicting symmetric products of deformed $\mathbb{R}\times \mathcal{N}$ seeds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if (3.16) agrees with the earlier JT-gravity and large-momentum results quoted in the paper, the winding-one sector could serve as a worldsheet derivation of $T\bar T$-deformed SCFT correlators beyond two points.
  • Editorial inference: the treatment of positive and negative radial momenta as independent suggests the $k=1$ boundary theory is not connected to standard $AdS_3/CFT_2$ by any marginal deformation, analogous to $\mathbb{R}^n$ versus $\mathbb{R}^n/\mathbb{Z}_2$, and higher-genus amplitudes may show new divergences in the strict decoupling limit.
  • Editorial inference: the same winding-one construction might be adapted to compute deformed three-point functions or the full chiral algebra, including the $SU(2)$ enhancement of the R-symmetries, which the paper leaves as an exercise.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper revisits the fermionic string on AdS3 × N at k = 1, with special attention to the (2,2) superstring on AdS3 × T3. It proposes that a decoupling limit of the standard string theory—keeping only delta-function normalizable winding-one continuous-representation states and treating positive and negative radial momenta as independent—is holographically dual to a symmetric product (R × N)^p/S_p, or to the T̄T-deformed version of that seed. The central construction assigns winding-one worldsheet representatives to the boundary chiral operators ∂xφ, affine currents K^a(x), the stress tensor T(x), and the single-trace T̄T and J̄T operators. The paper further computes deformed two-point functions (3.12) and (3.16) as string-theory predictions for T̄T-deformed R × N. A substantial part of the technical support is contained in Appendix A, which shows ∂̄x∂xφ = 0 in the k = 1 decoupled limit, and in Appendix B, which formalizes the FZZ duality used to relate winding-zero and winding-one presentations.

Significance. If the main identification is correct, the paper provides a concrete worldsheet dictionary for the k = 1 long-string decoupling limit and extends single-trace T̄T holography to explicit two-point functions. The explicit computation in Appendix A, the clean IR limits of (3.12) and (3.16), and the normalization matching the current level and central charge 6 are genuine assets. The paper is also honest about its limitations: footnote 8 concedes that the key OPE (2.11) lacks a direct derivation, and footnote 18 concedes that the Fourier-transform manipulations in Sections 3.3–3.4 ignore regularization. These admissions are helpful, but they also mark the two places where the logical chain is incomplete. The paper leans heavily on the authors' earlier work [1,2,16,29] for the setup and for the shape of the results; that is not itself a defect, but it means the incremental claims should be stated more crisply.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.4, eq. (2.11)] Equation (2.11) is the only input used to prove that the winding-one currents (2.8), the stress tensor (2.14), and the single-trace operators (2.19) and (2.22) obey the standard boundary OPE algebras. The claim that (2.11) “follows from [14] and FZZ duality” is not demonstrated, and footnote 8 explicitly concedes that a direct derivation is lacking. Since Φ^{w=1,j=1/2}_{h=1} is itself defined through the singular limit (2.9), the short-distance product of two such operators could in principle acquire contact terms or a coefficient different from the δ²(x1−x2) in (2.11). A direct derivation from SL(2,R) WZW correlators, or an explicit treatment of the limit in (2.9), is needed before the central identification with the boundary chiral algebra of (R×N)^p/S_p can be regarded as established.
  2. [§3.3–3.4, eqs. (3.12), (3.16) and footnote 18] The deformed two-point functions (3.12) and (3.16) are obtained by replacing h with h_{p²} = h + (α′/4)λ p² inside correlators after Fourier transformation (step 4 in §3.3 and step 5 in §3.4). Footnote 18 concedes that this step ignores regularization and renormalization issues in such Fourier transforms, citing [28] and [31]. This makes the two-point predictions conditional: the replacement should either be justified from the deformed worldsheet CFT, for example by computing directly in the null-gauged model reviewed in §3.1, or the results should be presented explicitly as conjectural extrapolations rather than as derived string-theory predictions. The IR limits check out—the Γ-ratio tends to 1 as p̄p → 0—but the functional form at finite p̄p depends on the unproven replacement.
  3. [§2.6, third and fifth bullets] The claimed enhancement of the R-symmetry currents from U(1) to SU(2), and of spacetime supersymmetry from (2,2) to (4,4), is one of the advertised ways in which the k = 1 winding-one operators reproduce the R × T³ seed, but the details are explicitly left “as an exercise to the reader.” Since this is a stated part of the holographic dictionary rather than a peripheral remark, the derivation should be supplied or the claim should be explicitly moved to future work in the main text.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.3 and Appendix A] The notation in (A.2) and (A.3) would benefit from a sentence clarifying that the limit s → 0 is taken after the correlation functions are defined, since the order of limits with the worldsheet z-integration in the vertex operators is not discussed.
  2. [§3.3, item 6] The instruction to “set h = 1 everywhere it appears” is potentially confusing because h also appears in the combination h_{p²} = 1 + (α′/4)λp̄p; the text should distinguish the undeformed value h from the on-shell function h_{p²} at each step.
  3. [§3.1, eq. (3.7)] Equation (3.7) is quoted from previous work; a one-sentence derivation or a pointer to the specific equations in [15] and [29] would improve readability for readers not working directly with those references.
  4. [Section 4, after eq. (4.1)] The statement that the large-momentum behavior (4.1) matches results in [31] and [16,30] would be easier to verify if the precise dictionary between the normalization in (3.12)/(3.16) and the renormalization scale μ used in (4.1) were stated explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the k=1 winding-one constructions and two-point predictions are derived from string-theory inputs, not fitted to the target; the main gap (OPE (2.11)) is an unproved input, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that winding-one delta-function normalizable worldsheet operators reproduce the chiral algebra of R×N and yield predictions for T\bar T-deformed R×N—is not circular: the operators in (2.8), (2.14), (2.19), and (2.22) are constructed from the vertex operator Φ^{w=1,j=1/2}_{h=1}, and their standard OPEs are then derived (or asserted) rather than assumed as the conclusion. The load-bearing OPE (2.11) is stated to 'follow from [14] and FZZ duality', with footnote 8 conceding 'Needless to say, it would be nice to have a direct derivation of (2.11).' This is a genuine derivation gap and a correctness risk, but it is not circularity: (2.11) is not equivalent to the current algebra (2.7) or the Virasoro OPE (2.13), and it is not fitted to those target results. Similarly, the two-point 'predictions' (3.12) and (3.16) are obtained by a stated calculational route—[15] two-point functions, the h→h_{p^2} replacement from the mass-shell trajectory (3.9), and the method of [16]—rather than by matching an external target answer; footnote 18 honestly flags the ignored regularization/renormalization issues in the Fourier-transform step. The paper does rely heavily on the authors' own prior work ([1,2,16,29]) for setup, notation, and technique, and the central framework is connected to the independent proposal [5] rather than to a self-citation chain. That self-reliance lowers the evidential weight of the 'predictions' but does not make any step reduce by construction to its own input; no equation is shown to be equivalent to the claimed result by definition. Consequently, no specific circular step can be exhibited, and the appropriate finding is no significant circularity, with a modest score reflecting the self-citation load and the unproved OPE input rather than actual circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The load-bearing inputs are (1) the [5] proposal that a k=1 AdS3 string theory restricted to continuous representations with |w| ≥ 1 is dual to a symmetric product with seed R × N; (2) the standard dictionary results of [14,15]; (3) the T̄T trajectory from the mass-shell condition; and (4) the asserted but underived OPE (2.11). The authors' contribution is the k=1 limiting procedure and the explicit operator constructions, which are computed rather than postulated. The only hand-set number is the overall 2pf normalization, fixed by IR physics. No new physical entities (particles, forces, dimensions) are introduced; the decoupled k=1 theory is a state-selection rule, not a new entity.

free parameters (1)
  • Overall normalization of the deformed 2pf = set so IR limit gives unit current level (3.12) and central charge 6 (3.16)
    Section 3.3, normalization comment after (3.12), and section 3.4, normalization step before (3.15): the prefactor is chosen by hand to reproduce the undeformed IR behavior. This is a physical boundary condition, not a fit to new data.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The k=1 decoupled theory is obtained by setting the Z2-twisted wall coefficient μ to zero, taking ϕ → ∞, and treating positive and negative radial momenta as independent
    Section 2.2: 'The only case in which this procedure is potentially sensible is k=1... setting μ=0 one recovers translational invariance in the ϕ direction.' Used again in section 3.3 item 5 and appendix C. This defines the theory under study; the paper argues it is disconnected from the μ≠0 theory.
  • domain assumption The delta-function OPE (2.11) of the winding-one vertex operator holds
    Section 2.4: Φ^{w=1,j=1/2}_{h=1}(x1,x̄1)Φ^{w=1,j=1/2}_{h=1}(x2,x̄2) ~ δ²(x1-x2)Φ^{w=1,j=1/2}_{h=1}(x2,x̄2). Stated to follow from [14] and FZZ duality, with no direct derivation given. Load-bearing for the OPE algebra of the winding-one currents.
  • domain assumption The T̄T trajectory h_{p²} = h + (α'/4)(λ/w)p² holds for fixed j = 1/2 + is and can be inserted into worldsheet correlation functions
    Section 3.1 eq. (3.9), obtained from the mass-shell condition (3.7) following [29] (self-cited) and [15]. Sections 3.3-3.4 replace h by h_{p²} inside correlators; footnote 18 admits the Fourier-transform regularization and renormalization issues are ignored.
  • standard math Standard AdS3/CFT2 correlation-function results from [15] (2pf of Φ^w) and [14] (2pf of ψ̄, stress-tensor vertex)
    Used throughout sections 2.4-2.5 and 3.3-3.4 as inputs. These are established, externally authored results treated as benchmarks rather than re-derived here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On string theory on (deformed) $AdS_3\times \mathbb{T}^3$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4ULUP6L6

@misc{pith2026250715929,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On string theory on (deformed) $AdS_3\times \mathbbT^3$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4ULUP6L6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.15929}
}
abstract

We revisit the fermionic string theory on $AdS_3\times \mathcal{N}$ with $k=1$, and its single-trace $T\bar T$ deformation, with a focus on the $(2,2)$ superstring on (deformed) $AdS_3\times \mathbb{T}^3$. In a certain limit, it is dual to the symmetric product of the ($T\bar T$-deformed) SCFT$_2$ on $\mathbb{R}\times \mathbb{T}^3$. We present the winding-one delta-function normalizable worldsheet operators which, in the $k=1$ decoupling limit, correspond to those of $\mathbb{R}\times \mathbb{T}^3$ in spacetime. We then demonstrate how their properties in string theory reproduce those of $\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{T}^3$, or more generally, of a ($T\bar{T}$-deformed) $\mathbb{R}\times\mathcal{N}$ seed of the boundary theory.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [14]

    Kutasov and N

    D. Kutasov and N. Seiberg, More comments on string theory on AdS(3) , JHEP 04 (1999) 008 [ hep-th/9903219]

    arXiv 1999

  2. [28]

    Giveon, N

    A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki and D. Kutasov, A solvable irrelevant deformation of AdS3/CFT2, JHEP 12 (2017) 155 [ 1707.05800]

    arXiv 2017

  3. [31]

    W. Cui, H. Shu, W. Song and J. Wang, Correlation functions in the TsT /T T correspondence, JHEP 04 (2024) 017 [ 2304.04684]

    arXiv 2024

  4. [1]

    Balthazar, A

    B. Balthazar, A. Giveon, D. Kutasov and E. J. Martinec, Asymptotically free AdS3/CFT2, JHEP 01 (2022) 008 [ 2109.00065]

    arXiv 2022

  5. [2]

    Effective $AdS_3/CFT_2$

    S. Chakraborty, A. Giveon and D. Kutasov, Effective AdS3/CFT2, JHEP 03 (2025) 030 [2501.09119]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  6. [3]

    Eberhardt, A perturbative CFT dual for pure NS–NS AdS 3 strings, J

    L. Eberhardt, A perturbative CFT dual for pure NS–NS AdS 3 strings, J. Phys. A 55 (2022) 064001 [ 2110.07535]

    arXiv 2022

  7. [4]

    Giveon, D

    A. Giveon, D. Kutasov, E. Rabinovici and A. Sever, Phases of quantum gravity in AdS(3) and linear dilaton backgrounds , Nucl. Phys. B 719 (2005) 3 [ hep-th/0503121]

    arXiv 2005

  8. [5]

    Eberhardt and M

    L. Eberhardt and M. R. Gaberdiel, A localising AdS3 sigma model, 2505.09226

    arXiv

Show all 36 references
  1. [6]

    Giribet, C

    G. Giribet, C. Hull, M. Kleban, M. Porrati and E. Rabinovici, Superstrings on AdS 3 at k = 1, JHEP 08 (2018) 204 [ 1803.04420]

    2018 arXiv

  2. [7]

    M. R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar, Tensionless string spectra on AdS 3, JHEP 05 (2018) 085 [ 1803.04423]

    2018 arXiv

  3. [8]

    M. R. Gaberdiel and V. Sriprachyakul, Tensionless strings on AdS3 × S3 × S3 × S1, 2411.16848. – 24 –

    arXiv

  4. [9]

    Giribet, String theory on AdS 3 × M7 in the tensionless limit , Int

    G. Giribet, String theory on AdS 3 × M7 in the tensionless limit , Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 29 (2020) 2030005 [ 2003.02868]

    2020 arXiv

  5. [10]

    Giveon, D

    A. Giveon, D. Kutasov and N. Seiberg, Comments on string theory on AdS(3) , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 733 [ hep-th/9806194]

    1998 arXiv

  6. [11]

    Seiberg and E

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, The D1 / D5 system and singular CFT , JHEP 04 (1999) 017 [hep-th/9903224]

    1999 arXiv

  7. [12]

    Argurio, A

    R. Argurio, A. Giveon and A. Shomer, Superstrings on AdS(3) and symmetric products, JHEP 12 (2000) 003 [ hep-th/0009242]

    2000 arXiv

  8. [13]

    Aharony, A

    O. Aharony, A. Giveon and D. Kutasov, LSZ in LST , Nucl. Phys. B 691 (2004) 3 [hep-th/0404016]

    2004 arXiv

  9. [15]

    J. M. Maldacena and H. Ooguri, Strings in AdS(3) and the SL(2,R) WZW model. Part

  10. [16]

    Correlation functions , Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 106006 [ hep-th/0111180]

    2002 arXiv

  11. [17]

    Giveon, 2pf in single-trace T T holography, JHEP 10 (2023) 112 [ 2309.15629]

    A. Giveon, 2pf in single-trace T T holography, JHEP 10 (2023) 112 [ 2309.15629]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [18]

    Giveon and M

    A. Giveon and M. Rocek, Supersymmetric string vacua on AdS3 × N , JHEP 04 (1999) 019 [hep-th/9904024]

    1999 arXiv

  13. [19]

    Berenstein and R

    D. Berenstein and R. G. Leigh, Space-time supersymmetry in AdS(3) backgrounds , Phys. Lett. B 458 (1999) 297 [ hep-th/9904040]

    1999 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Giveon and A

    A. Giveon and A. Pakman, More on superstrings in AdS(3) x N , JHEP 03 (2003) 056 [hep-th/0302217]

    2003 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Elitzur, O

    S. Elitzur, O. Feinerman, A. Giveon and D. Tsabar, String theory on AdS3 × S3 × S3 × S1, Phys. Lett. B 449 (1999) 180 [ hep-th/9811245]

    1999 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Giveon, N

    A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki and D. Kutasov, T T and LST , JHEP 07 (2017) 122 [1701.05576]

    2017 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Jiang, A pedagogical review on solvable irrelevant deformations of 2D quantum field theory, Commun

    Y. Jiang, A pedagogical review on solvable irrelevant deformations of 2D quantum field theory, Commun. Theor. Phys. 73 (2021) 057201 [ 1904.13376]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Apolo, S

    L. Apolo, S. Detournay and W. Song, TsT, T ¯T and black strings , JHEP 06 (2020) 109 [1911.12359]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Chakraborty, A

    S. Chakraborty, A. Giveon and D. Kutasov, T ¯T , J ¯T , T ¯J and String Theory , J. Phys. A 52 (2019) 384003 [ 1905.00051]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [26]

    Apolo and W

    L. Apolo and W. Song, TsT, black holes, and T T + JT + T J, JHEP 04 (2022) 177 [2111.02243]

    2022 arXiv

  21. [27]

    Giveon and D

    A. Giveon and D. Vainshtein, To B or not to be in single-trace T ¯T holography, Nucl. Phys. B 1015 (2025) 116905 [ 2408.03022]. – 25 –

    2025 arXiv

  22. [29]

    Asrat, A

    M. Asrat, A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki and D. Kutasov, Holography Beyond AdS, Nucl. Phys. B 932 (2018) 241 [ 1711.02690]

    2018 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Giveon, Comments on T ¯T , J ¯T and String Theory , 1903.06883

    A. Giveon, Comments on T ¯T , J ¯T and String Theory , 1903.06883

    1903 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Aharony and N

    O. Aharony and N. Barel, Correlation functions in T T-deformed Conformal Field Theories, JHEP 08 (2023) 035 [ 2304.14091]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Chakraborty, A

    S. Chakraborty, A. Giveon and A. Hashimoto, Thermal partition function of J3J 3 deformed AdS3, JHEP 07 (2024) 141 [ 2403.03979]

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Chakraborty, A

    S. Chakraborty, A. Giveon and A. Hashimoto, On string theory on deformed BTZ and TT, JHEP 04 (2024) 134 [ 2402.05776]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Iguri and N

    S. Iguri and N. Kovensky, On spectrally flowed local vertex operators in AdS 3, SciPost Phys. 13 (2022) 115 [ 2208.00978]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Giveon and D

    A. Giveon and D. Kutasov, Notes on AdS(3) , Nucl. Phys. B 621 (2002) 303 [hep-th/0106004]. – 26 –

    2002 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.