Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 47 references

Material-Driven Optimization of Transmon Qubits for Scalable and Efficient Quantum Architectures

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A design loop that couples transmon layout to material-loss simulation aims to make superconducting qubits more reliable and scalable.

desk verdict The abstract is a standard transmon-simulation workflow with no quantitative results, and the full text is corrupted, so there is nothing here to referee as submitted. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.05339 v1 pith:4VLRWXIS submitted 2025-08-07 quant-ph physics.optics

Jonnalagadda Gayatri , S.Saravana Veni This is my paper
classification quant-phphysics.optics
keywords transmonqubitssuperconductingparticipationratiomaterial-losssimulationanharmonicitycoherencetimequantumchipdesigneigenmodeanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that a design loop combining transmon circuit layout with material-aware electromagnetic simulation can identify qubit designs with lower material-induced energy loss, and that this is a workable path toward scalable superconducting quantum processors. The authors construct 4- and 8-qubit transmon layouts, extract eigenfrequencies and anharmonicities, compute participation ratios, and then model a 2D cross-section of a single qubit with different superconductors and substrates. If the framework is right, material and geometry choices can be screened in simulation before fabrication, which would shorten development cycles and support fault-tolerant architectures.

What carries the argument

The participation ratio $p_i = \langle E_i\rangle/\langle E_{\text{total}}\rangle$, the fraction of electromagnetic energy stored in each lossy region, is the central object: it converts a field simulation into a material-loss estimate and lets different superconductors and substrates be compared quantitatively. The supporting mechanism is the 2D cross-sectional model of a single qubit, which allows the material stack to be changed and the resulting energy loss and electromagnetic properties to be recomputed, together with anharmonicity extracted from the eigenfrequencies to ensure qubit operation.

What would settle it

Fabricate a batch of transmon devices spanning the simulated material and geometry combinations and measure $T_1$ and $T_2$. If measured coherence does not rank inversely with the simulated participation ratios, or if predicted low-loss materials do not outperform predicted high-loss ones, the framework's predictive core is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that an integrated framework—layout generation in a circuit-design tool, eigenmode analysis with an electromagnetic solver, participation-ratio extraction, and a two-dimensional cross-sectional material-loss model—determines how material choice affects transmon performance. Applying it to 4- and 8-qubit transmon layouts, the authors analyze the top five energy eigenstates per qubit and track anharmonicity and participation ratios across design passes. Material changes alter the field distribution and energy loss, so the participation ratio acts as the quantitative link between materials and coherence. The paper's conclusion is that this simulation-based screening offers a wo

Load-bearing premise

The simulations—especially the 2D cross-sectional material model and the participation-ratio eigenmode analysis—capture the dominant loss mechanisms that determine coherence in real fabricated transmon qubits.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Engineers can compare candidate materials and geometries in simulation before committing to fabrication, reducing trial-and-error development.
  • Participation ratios provide a quantitative ranking of which material regions dominate loss for a given layout, guiding targeted materials improvements.
  • The pipeline can be extended to larger qubit arrays, revealing how layout-dependent material sensitivity changes with chip scale.
  • Material loss data can be linked to predicted coherence times, giving device physicists a metric to check against measured $T_1$ and $T_2$.
  • The same workflow could be adapted to other superconducting qubit geometries, not just transmon layouts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 2D cross-section approximation is trustworthy, a natural extension is a full 3D chip-level simulation to capture package losses and crosstalk that 2D misses.
  • The framework implies material selection and circuit geometry should be co-optimized rather than chosen independently, since participation ratios depend on both.
  • A direct test would be to fabricate the simulated 'best' and 'worst' designs and see whether measured coherence tracks the participation-ratio ranking; the paper does not yet report such measurements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes an integrated simulation workflow for transmon qubit optimization. It reports creating 4- and 8-qubit layouts in Qiskit Metal, analyzing eigenfrequencies and anharmonicity for each qubit, computing participation ratios for the top five energy eigenstates using Ansys HFSS, and constructing a 2D cross-section in COMSOL to compare candidate materials. The abstract concludes that this framework 'offers a workable way to create reliable superconducting qubit systems.' The full text provided is heavily corrupted (mojibake), so the technical details, equations, tables, and figures cannot be verified.

Significance. If the workflow were validated, it could serve as a useful pre-fabrication screening tool for material and geometry selection in transmon design. The paper's strength is its explicit integration of three standard simulation tools (Qiskit Metal, HFSS, COMSOL) and its focus on multi-qubit layouts. However, as submitted, the abstract contains no quantitative results, error bars, or comparisons with experiment or published benchmarks, and the body text is unreadable. No code or data are provided. The central claim of a "workable way to create reliable superconducting qubit systems" is therefore not currently supported.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract, final sentence] The central claim that the framework "offers a workable way to create reliable superconducting qubit systems" is unsupported by any quantitative evidence in the abstract. No predicted coherence times, quality factors, participation-ratio values, or comparisons with experimental data are reported. For a simulation methodology, this load-bearing claim requires at least one benchmark against measured transmon coherence (e.g., T1/T2 of a known device) or the claim must be reframed as a design-exploration workflow rather than a route to reliable qubits.
  2. [Full text (passim)] The body text is corrupted and cannot be parsed: equations, tables, figures, and section contents are illegible. This prevents verification of mesh parameters, material loss tangents, eigenmode extraction, participation-ratio formulas, and convergence criteria. A manuscript whose technical content cannot be read cannot be accepted; the authors must resubmit a readable version before further technical review is possible.
  3. [Abstract / COMSOL-HFSS setup] The 2D COMSOL cross-section model is a potential source of systematic error: 2D models omit 3D field distributions, package modes, and radiation losses. The HFSS participation-ratio results are also sensitive to assumed loss tangents and mesh convergence. The paper should provide a convergence study and compare simulated loss contributions to measured coherence for a known device; otherwise the material ranking cannot be distinguished from simulation artifacts.
  4. [Abstract / design iteration] The design iteration over "several design passes" is described only qualitatively. No uncertainty quantification, sensitivity analysis, or error bars are given for the material parameters or the resulting participation ratios. Without these, the robustness of the proposed optimization cannot be assessed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Full text header] The full text displays the arXiv identifier "arXiv:2508.05335v3 [astro-ph.GA] 8 Jun 2026", which is inconsistent with the manuscript's stated identifier and subject class (quant-ph). This should be corrected.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase "top five energy eigenstates" is undefined. Please specify the selection criterion and whether these are the five lowest states or some other subset.
  3. [References] The bibliography is largely garbled and incomplete. Full, readable references are needed for all cited tools, methods, and benchmark experiments.
  4. [Abstract] The phrase "connections between individual qubits" is vague. Please clarify whether inter-qubit coupling strengths are simulated and how they are incorporated into the design analysis.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the simulation chain is self-contained; absent experimental validation is a correctness risk, not a definitional reduction.

full rationale

The paper's claimed chain is Qiskit Metal layout generation -> HFSS eigenmode simulation (eigenfrequencies, anharmonicity, participation ratios) -> COMSOL 2D cross-section loss analysis with assigned material parameters. Each output is computed from independent inputs (geometry and material properties) via standard electromagnetic simulation; no output quantity is defined in terms of the quantity it is used to predict, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The abstract's design-iteration language could in principle hide tuning of design parameters, but the manuscript contains no quoted equation or fitted value that would make a reported result equal to its own input by construction. The paper also invokes no load-bearing self-citation or uniqueness theorem from the authors. The lack of experimental or literature validation of the simulated coherence times is a substantive external-validity limitation and a correctness risk, but it does not make the derivation circular. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited under the paper's own equations or citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new free parameters or invented entities in the abstract. It relies on standard domain assumptions about simulation models predicting qubit performance. The absence of quantitative validation makes these assumptions load-bearing but unverified.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Participation ratio and eigenmode analysis in HFSS quantitatively indicate qubit coherence.
    The abstract states they compute participation ratios and eigenfrequencies to inform qubit performance, but no validation is provided that these simulation outputs correlate with measured coherence.
  • domain assumption Material parameters (superconducting gap, loss tangent, dielectric constant) input into COMSOL represent the actual fabricated device materials.
    Material choices are evaluated in a 2D cross-section, but the abstract does not state that these parameters are taken from reliable measurements or that the model accounts for interface losses and two-level systems.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Material-Driven Optimization of Transmon Qubits for Scalable and Efficient Quantum Architectures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4VLRWXIS

@misc{pith2026250805339,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Material-Driven Optimization of Transmon Qubits for Scalable and Efficient Quantum Architectures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4VLRWXIS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.05339}
}
read the original abstract

One of the most crucial steps in creating practical quantum computers is designing scalable and efficient superconducting qubits. Coherence times, connections between individual qubits, and reduction of environmental noise are critical factors in the success of these qubits. Because they can be lithographically fabricated and are less sensitive to charge noise, superconducting qubits, especially those based on the Transmon architecture, have emerged as top contenders for scalable platforms. In this work, we use a combination of design iteration, material analysis, and simulation to tackle the superconducting qubit optimization challenge. We created transmon-based layouts for 4 qubits and 8 qubits using Qiskit Metal and conducted an individual analysis for each qubit. We investigated anharmonicity and extracted eigenfrequencies, computing participation ratios across several design passes, and identifying the top five energy eigenstates using Ansys HFSS. We then created a 2D cross section of a single qubit design in COMSOL Multiphysics to evaluate how different materials affect performance. This enables us to assign various superconducting materials and substrates and investigate their effects on energy loss and electromagnetic properties. Qubit coherence and overall device quality are significantly influenced by the materials chosen. This integrated framework of material based simulation and circuit design offers a workable way to create reliable superconducting qubit systems and supports continued attempts to create scalable, fault-tolerant quantum computing.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [10]

    Towards practical quantum computers: Transmon qubit with a lifetime approaching 0.5 milliseconds , Wang, Chenlu et al., npj Quantum Information, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 3, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41534-021-00513-2

    work page 2022

  2. [11]

    8, 2012, pp

    Demonstration of two-qubit algorithms with a superconducting quantum processor , Lucero, Erik et al., Nature Physics, vol. 8, 2012, pp. 719--723. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2385

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys2385 2012

  3. [12]

    10, 2020, pp

    Demonstrating two-qubit gates at the quantum speed limit using superconducting qubits , Kjaergaard, Morten et al., Physical Review X, vol. 10, 2020, pp. 021058. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.10.021058

    doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.021058 2020

  4. [13]

    85, 2012, pp

    Coherent control of two Jaynes--Cummings cavities , Majumdar, Arka et al., Physical Review A, vol. 85, 2012, pp. 033802. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.85.033802

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.85.033802 2012

  5. [14]

    R., Physical Review Letters, vol

    de Haas--van Alphen effect in superconductors , Norman, M. R., Physical Review Letters, vol. 72, 1994, pp. 2077. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.2077

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.72.2077 1994

  6. [15]

    Fast universal quantum gates on microwave photons with all-resonance operations in circuit QED , Su, Qi-Ping et al., Scientific Reports, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 3898, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03898

    work page doi:10.1038/srep03898 2014

  7. [16]

    Entanglement of superconducting qubits via microwave photons in a cavity , Majer, Johannes et al., Nature, vol. 449, pp. 443--447, 2007. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06184

    doi:10.1038/nature06184 2007

  8. [17]

    A blueprint for demonstrating quantum supremacy with superconducting qubits , Boixo, Sergio et al., Nature Physics, vol. 14, pp. 595--600, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0124-x

    doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0124-x 2018

Show all 47 references
  1. [18]

    Simulating complex quantum systems with a superconducting quantum processor , Arute, Frank et al., Nature, vol. 569, pp. 505--510, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1040-7

    2019 doi

  2. [19]

    Quantum simulation of spin models on an arbitrary lattice with trapped ions , Kim, Kihwan et al., Nature, vol. 465, pp. 590--593, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09071

    2010 doi

  3. [20]

    Coherence in a superconducting quantum bit , Nakamura, Yasunobu et al., Nature, vol. 398, pp. 786--788, 1999. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/19718

    1999 doi

  4. [21]

    M., and Osborne, K., arXiv preprint cond-mat/0402415, 2004

    Superconducting Qubits and the Physics of Josephson Junctions , Martinis, J. M., and Osborne, K., arXiv preprint cond-mat/0402415, 2004. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0402415

    2004 arXiv

  5. [22]

    M., Gambetta, J., et al., Physical Review A, vol

    Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box , Koch, J., Yu, T. M., Gambetta, J., et al., Physical Review A, vol. 76, no. 4, p. 042319, 2007. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042319

    2007 doi

  6. [23]

    New material platform for superconducting transmon qubits with coherence times exceeding 0.3 milliseconds , Place, A. P. M., Rodgers, L. V. H., Mundada, P., et al., Nature Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22030-5

    2021 doi

  7. [24]

    SQuADDS: A validated design database and simulation workflow for superconducting qubit design , Shanto, S., Kuo, A., Miyamoto, C., et al., Quantum, vol. 8, p. 1465, Sep. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-09-09-1465

    2024 doi

  8. [25]

    E., Ma, R., and Chew, W

    An introduction to the transmon qubit for electromagnetic engineers , Roth, T. E., Ma, R., and Chew, W. C., arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.11352, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.11352

    2021 arXiv

  9. [26]

    Y., arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.02263, 2025

    Analysis of a 3D Integrated Superconducting Quantum Chip Structure , Saslow, J., and Wong, H. Y., arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.02263, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.02263

    2025

  10. [27]

    [Online]

    Titanium Nitride Film on Sapphire Substrate with Low Dielectric Loss for Superconducting Qubits , Deng, H., Song, Z., Gao, R., et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.03528, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.03528

    2022 arXiv

  11. [28]

    B., Vissers, M

    Improved superconducting qubit coherence using titanium nitride , Chang, J. B., Vissers, M. R., Córcoles, A. D., et al., Applied Physics Letters, vol. 103, no. 1, Jul. 2013. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4813269

    2013 doi

  12. [29]

    A., Banchi, L., et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, vol

    First design of a superconducting qubit for the QUB-IT experiment , Labranca, D., Corti, H. A., Banchi, L., et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, vol. 1046, p. 167716, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2022.167716

    2023

  13. [30]

    Towards practical quantum computers: Transmon qubit with a lifetime approaching 0.5 milliseconds , Wang, C., Li, X., Xu, H., et al., npj Quantum Information, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 3, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-021-00522-x

    2022 doi

  14. [31]

    [Online]

    Quantum transduction of optical photons from a superconducting qubit , Mirhosseini, M., Sipahigil, A., Kalaee, M., and Painter, O., arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.04838, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.04838

    2004 arXiv

  15. [32]

    C., Strickland, W

    Tunable capacitor for superconducting qubits using an InAs/InGaAs heterostructure , Materise, N., Dartiailh, M. C., Strickland, W. M., et al., Quantum Science and Technology, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 045014, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ace33f

    2023 doi

  16. [33]

    M., and Osborne, K., Physical Review Applied, vol

    Superconducting Qubits and the Physics of Josephson Junctions , Martinis, J. M., and Osborne, K., Physical Review Applied, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 054026, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.054026

    2020 doi

  17. [34]

    A., Kupriyanov, M

    The current-phase relation in Josephson junctions , Golubov, A. A., Kupriyanov, M. Y., and Il'ichev, E., Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 411–469, 2004. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.76.411

    2004 doi

  18. [35]

    A fast tunable 3D-transmon architecture for superconducting qubit-based hybrid devices , Majumder, S., Bera, T., Suresh, R., and Singh, V., Journal of Low Temperature Physics, vol. 207, no. 3, pp. 210–219, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-022-02781-7

    2022 doi

  19. [36]

    Direct manipulation of a superconducting spin qubit strongly coupled to a transmon qubit , Pita-Vidal, M., Bargerbos, A., Žitko, R., et al., Nature Physics, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1110–1115, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-023-01798-x

    2023 doi

  20. [37]

    S., Cruz, D., and André, P., Scientific Reports, vol

    Native multi-qubit gates in transmon qubits via synchronous driving , Pratapsi, S. S., Cruz, D., and André, P., Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 26042, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-26899-5

    2024 doi

  21. [38]

    D., Guthrie, A., Mäkinen, I

    Electromagnetic simulation and microwave circuit approach of heat transport in superconducting qubits , Satrya, C. D., Guthrie, A., Mäkinen, I. K., and Pekola, J. P., Journal of Physics Communications, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 015005, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.108...

    2023 doi

  22. [39]

    P., Yan, Z., et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16748, 2024

    Fast unconditional reset and leakage reduction in fixed-frequency transmon qubits , Chen, L., Fors, S. P., Yan, Z., et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.16748, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.16748

    2024 arXiv

  23. [40]

    Characterization of process-related interfacial dielectric loss in aluminum-on-silicon by resonator microwave measurements, materials analysis, and imaging , Chayanun, L., Biznárová, J., Zeng, L., et al., APL Quantum, vol. 1, no. 2, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/1...

    2024 doi

  24. [41]

    S., Register, L

    Engineering Si-Qubit MOSFETs: A Phase-Field Modeling Approach Integrating Quantum-Electrostatics at Cryogenic Temperatures , Pandey, N., Basu, D., Chauhan, Y. S., Register, L. F., and Banerjee, S. K., arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.04339, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.or...

    2024 arXiv

  25. [42]

    Raschi and A

    L. Raschi and A. Gnudi, ``Simulation framework for hole spin qubits,'' in Proc. Annu. Meeting Ital. Electron. Soc., pp. 85--93, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65958-2_11

    2024 doi

  26. [43]

    Programmable superconducting processor with native three-qubit gates , Roy, T., Hazra, S., Kundu, S., et al., Physical Review Applied, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 014072, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.014072

    2020 doi

  27. [44]

    Multimode superconducting circuits for realizing strongly coupled multiqubit processor units , Roy, T., Chand, M., Bhattacharjee, A., et al., Physical Review A, vol. 98, no. 5, p. 052318, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.052318

    2018 doi

  28. [45]

    Merged-element transmon , Zhao, R., Park, S., Zhao, T., et al., Physical Review Applied, vol. 14, no. 6, p. 064006, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.064006

    2020 doi

  29. [46]

    High kinetic inductance NbN nanowire superinductors , Niepce, D., Burnett, J., and Bylander, J., Physical Review Applied, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 044014, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.044014

    2019 doi

  30. [47]

    J., Bengtsson, A., Scigliuzzo, M., et al., npj Quantum Information, vol

    Decoherence benchmarking of superconducting qubits , Burnett, J. J., Bengtsson, A., Scigliuzzo, M., et al., npj Quantum Information, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 54, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-019-0168-5

    2019 doi

  31. [48]

    J., Latorre, M

    Geometric scaling of two-level-system loss in superconducting resonators , Niepce, D., Burnett, J. J., Latorre, M. G., and Bylander, J., Superconductor Science and Technology, vol. 33, no. 2, p. 025013, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ab5e7d

    2020 doi

  32. [49]

    Improved success probability with greater circuit depth for the quantum approximate optimization algorithm , Bengtsson, A., Vikstål, P., Warren, C., et al., Physical Review Applied, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 034010, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.034010

    2020 doi

  33. [50]

    J., Kudra, M., et al., Science Advances, vol

    Stability of superconducting resonators: Motional narrowing and the role of Landau-Zener driving of two-level defects , Niepce, D., Burnett, J. J., Kudra, M., et al., Science Advances, vol. 7, no. 39, p. eabh0462, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abh0462

    2021 doi

  34. [51]

    Implementation of pairwise longitudinal coupling in a three-qubit superconducting circuit , Roy, T., Kundu, S., Chand, M., et al., Physical Review Applied, vol. 7, no. 5, p. 054025, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.7.054025

    2017 doi

  35. [52]

    [Online]

    A programmable three-qubit superconducting processor with all-to-all connectivity , Roy, T., Hazra, S., Kundu, S., et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.00668, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.00668

    2018 arXiv

  36. [53]

    V., Bhattacharjee, A., et al., Applied Physics Letters, vol

    Engineering cross resonance interaction in multi-modal quantum circuits , Hazra, S., Salunkhe, K. V., Bhattacharjee, A., et al., Applied Physics Letters, vol. 116, no. 15, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0005583

    2020 doi

  37. [54]

    Entangling transmons with low-frequency protected superconducting qubits , Maiani, A., Kjaergaard, M., and Schrade, C., PRX Quantum, vol. 3, no. 3, p. 030329, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.030329

    2022 doi

  38. [55]

    Double-transmon coupler: Fast two-qubit gate with no residual coupling for highly detuned superconducting qubits , Goto, H., Physical Review Applied, vol. 18, no. 3, p. 034038, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.034038

    2022 doi

  39. [56]

    Suppression of crosstalk in superconducting qubits using dynamical decoupling , Tripathi, V., Chen, H., Khezri, M., et al., Physical Review Applied, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 024068, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.024068

    2022 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.