Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 43 references

Thermodynamics and Statistical Equilibrium of Large-Scale Hydroelastic Wave Turbulence

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper reports the first experimental evidence that large-scale hydroelastic wave turbulence can settle into a statistical-equilibrium, Rayleigh-Jeans thermalized state while the small scales remain driven and dissipative.

desk verdict Solid first spatiotemporal evidence for large-scale Rayleigh-Jeans equilibrium in hydroelastic waves; main gap is ruling out direct low-frequency forcing leakage. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03353 v1 pith:4W2ZMNUA submitted 2025-06-03 physics.flu-dyn cond-mat.stat-mechnlin.CDphysics.ao-ph

Marlone Vernet , Eric Falcon This is my paper
classification physics.flu-dyncond-mat.stat-mechnlin.CDphysics.ao-ph
keywords hydroelasticwaveswaveturbulencestatisticalequilibriumRayleigh-Jeansspectrumequipartitioneffectivetemperatureenergyfluxtensional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first experimental evidence that the large scales of hydroelastic wave turbulence can sit in a thermalized, statistical-equilibrium state while the small scales remain driven and dissipative. The experiment forces random waves at small scales on a water surface covered by a stretched elastic sheet and observes the much larger scales in space and time. In that large-scale band the measured spectra follow the Rayleigh-Jeans equilibrium predictions, $S_\eta(k)\propto k^{-1}$ and $S_\eta(f)\propto f^{-1}$, over more than a decade, with zero net energy flux, Gaussian wave-amplitude statistics, and Boltzmann-like energy fluctuations. If the claim holds, the large scales of a driven turbulent wave system can be described by classical thermodynamics, with an effective temperature, an entropy, and a heat capacity, rather than by a cascade of energy through scales.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Rayleigh-Jeans equilibrium spectrum of weak wave turbulence, the wave analogue of the blackbody spectrum. Because hydroelastic waves interact through three-wave processes, wave action is not conserved and no inverse cascade carries flux toward large scales, so modes larger than the forcing scale are expected to equipartition, giving $E^{Eq}(k)=k_B\theta/(2\pi\rho)k$ and hence the measured $S_\eta(k)\propto k^{-1}$ and $S_\eta(f)\propto f^{-1}$. The experimental machinery that exposes this regime is a square tank with a silicone sheet, a solid ring that suppresses tank eigenmodes, random small-scale forcing from a circular wavemaker, space-time resolved Fourier transform profilometry, and an energy-flux estimate built from spectral dissipation. The dispersion relation $\omega^2=gk+(T/\rho)k^3+(B/\rho)k^5$ connects the spatial and frequency spectra, and the tension-dominated nature of the waves is verified by the collapse of $f/\sqrt{T}$ against $k^{3/2}$.

What would settle it

Measure the large-scale spectrum while reducing the forcing amplitude until wave-wave interactions are negligible: if the $k^{-1}$ and $f^{-1}$ shapes persist with amplitudes set by the forcing level rather than by the effective temperature, the apparent equilibrium is a forced tail. Alternatively, a direct measurement of the nonlinear energy transfer in the band below the forcing scale, for example from third-order correlations, showing a nonzero net flux would contradict the zero-flux thermalization claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that hydroelastic waves on a silicone sheet forced randomly at 50 to 100 Hz thermalize at scales larger than the forcing scale: the wave field's spatial and temporal power spectra agree with the Rayleigh-Jeans equilibrium spectra $S_\eta^{Eq}(k)=k_B\theta/(2\pi T)k^{-1}$ and $S_\eta^{Eq}(f)=k_B\theta/(3\pi T)f^{-1}$ over more than a decade of scales, down to the first tank eigenmode. The measured energy flux in this band is zero, large-scale dissipation is below 5%, and the integrated spectrum gives an effective temperature $\theta\simeq 8\times10^{15}$ K, with the entropy derivative and heat capacity matching equipartition among $N_f\simeq 5600$ Fourier modes. The authors frame this as the coexistence of equilibrium large scales with nonequilibrium small-scale dynamics, made visible by suppressing tank eigenmodes with a solid ring and by resolving the wave field in both space and time.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the small circular wavemaker forcing at 50 to 100 Hz does not directly inject energy into scales larger than the forcing scale, so the observed $k^{-1}$ and $f^{-1}$ spectra and the zero net flux reflect genuine nonlinear thermalization rather than a low-frequency tail of the forcing or residual tank eigenmodes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Above the forcing scale, wave-turbulence spectra should be expected to have an equilibrium, Rayleigh-Jeans form rather than a cascade form, at least in systems without an inverse cascade.
  • Forcing strength acts as a temperature knob: the effective temperature grows with the wave-amplitude variance, $\theta\sim\sigma_\eta^2$, so the equilibrium band can be tuned experimentally.
  • Thermodynamic response functions, including entropy and a per-mode heat capacity equal to $k_B$, become measurable quantities for a turbulent wave field.
  • The coexistence of equilibrium large scales and nonequilibrium small scales sets up a system in which tools of equilibrium and nonequilibrium statistical mechanics, such as fluctuation relations, can be tested experimentally.
  • For ice-covered oceans, where swells can act as small-scale forcing, large-scale flexural-gravity waves may be described by an effective temperature rather than by cascade scaling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the three-wave thermalization mechanism is generic, then any wave-turbulence system without an inverse cascade should exhibit a measurable Rayleigh-Jeans band above the forcing scale; applying the same space-time method to gravity-capillary or pure flexural waves would test that universality.
  • The inferred temperature rests on the integrated spectral amplitude, so an independent check would be to force with two well-separated small-scale bands and test whether the two effective temperatures add like equilibrium heat baths.
  • A per-mode heat capacity equal to $k_B$ suggests the equilibrium band is an ideal classical wave gas; lowering the forcing cutoff could drive it toward condensation-like effects, analogous to classical wave condensation in optics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experiment on hydroelastic wave turbulence in a square tank covered by a thin elastic sheet, forced randomly at small scales (50–100 Hz) by a circular wavemaker. The authors measure the wave amplitude in space (Fourier transform profilometry) and time (laser Doppler velocimetry) and observe that, at scales larger than the forcing scale, the spatial spectrum scales as k^-1 and the frequency spectrum scales as f^-1/T, in agreement with the predicted Rayleigh–Jeans equilibrium spectra of hydroelastic tensional waves. They also report a Gaussian amplitude distribution, zero net energy flux in the equilibrium band, an effective temperature of order 10^15 K, and entropy and heat-capacity estimates that follow the equipartition prediction C_v = N_f k_B/2. The central claim is the first experimental evidence of statistical equilibrium of the large scales of hydroelastic wave turbulence, with the wave field behaving like a thermalized collection of Fourier modes over more than a decade.

Significance. If the interpretation is correct, the paper would provide a clear experimental realization of large-scale statistical equilibrium in a wave-turbulence system that is resolved in both space and time, extending earlier single-point observations in capillary and flexural wave turbulence. The dispersion-relation collapse across tension values in Fig. 2 and the f^-1/T rescaling in Fig. 4 are visually compelling, and the zero-flux measurement is a relevant control. The quantitative thermodynamics (effective temperature, entropy, heat capacity) is a natural extension, though its evidential weight is weaker because it relies on the same spectral assumption used to extract the temperature. The main risk is that the equilibrium attribution depends on the absence of direct low-frequency forcing from the wavemaker, a point that is asserted but not directly measured in the manuscript.

major comments (4)
  1. [Experimental setup; Equilibrium power spectra (Fig. 4 inset)] The attribution of the band f_L < f < f_p to nonlinear thermalization rests on the assumption that the shaker/wavemaker does not directly inject energy into those scales. The manuscript reports neither the accelerometer spectrum below f_p nor the coherence between the drive signal and the large-scale wave field, and it does not provide an off-resonance control (for example, shifting the forcing band while leaving the low-frequency mechanical response unchanged). Since f_L lies at the lower edge of the fitted decade, even a weak low-frequency mechanical tail or a residual tank eigenmode could produce the reported k^-1 and f^-1 spectra without implying thermalization. Please provide a quantitative transfer-function-style test or an explicit bound on direct low-frequency forcing.
  2. [Equilibrium power spectra (Figs. 3 and 4)] The central quantitative claim is the k^-1 and f^-1/T scaling over more than a decade, but no fitting procedure, fit ranges, slope values, or confidence intervals are reported. Please give the fitted slopes with uncertainties and demonstrate insensitivity to the endpoints f_L and f_p; otherwise the 'over more than a decade' statement is difficult to evaluate.
  3. [Effective temperature; Entropy and heat capacity (Eq. (5), Fig. 5)] The effective temperature theta is obtained by integrating the measured spectrum under the assumed f^-1 form of Eq. (4), and the subsequent verification that theta scales as sigma_eta^2 follows from Parseval's theorem applied to the same spectrum. This is therefore an internal consistency check rather than an independent prediction. Likewise, the entropy derivative and heat capacity are computed by injecting the Rayleigh-Jeans spectrum, so the agreement in Fig. 6 is a consistency test of the equilibrium ansatz rather than a new thermodynamic statement. Please reframe these sections accordingly and avoid presenting them as independent verifications.
  4. [Equilibrium power spectra (Fig. 4 inset)] The zero net energy flux is a load-bearing observable, but the inset reports it without error bars and with only a brief reference to a dissipation-based method in the Supplemental Material. Given that this measurement distinguishes equilibrium from directly driven random fields, please include uncertainties and a concise description of the dissipation model used to infer the flux.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Dispersion relation (spectrum definition)] The symbol L is used first for the tank side (600 mm) and later as 'the ring diameter' in the definition of S_eta(k,omega); please define the ring diameter explicitly and distinguish it from the tank dimension.
  2. [Equilibrium power spectra; Fig. 4 caption] The phrase 'first axisymmetrical eigenmode' should be 'axisymmetric', and the value f_L = 1.4 Hz should be identified as the eigenmode of the tank, of the ring, or of the sheet-covered system, since this is the lower bound of the fitted decade.
  3. [Theoretical predictions (Eq. (2))] In the sentence on bending waves, the notation '1/ℓ_tb ~ 300 m^-1' is inconsistent with the definition 'ℓ_tb = 2π sqrt(B/T)'; please clarify whether the quoted value is 1/ℓ_tb or a typographical error.
  4. [Experimental setup] The sentence 'Note that the sheet at rest is flat everywhere except close to the solid ring where all the curvature is confined' suggests the sheet is not perfectly flat in the measurement region near the ring; please state whether the reported data exclude that curved region.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Spectral equilibrium slopes are independent predictions; only the θ-vs-σ² check reduces to Eq. (5) by Parseval, so circularity is minor and local.

  1. self definitional [Effective temperature section, Eq. (5) and Fig. 5 (including inset)]
    "One can also estimate the effective temperature by directly computing the wave-amplitude variance σ_η^2 = ⟨η^2⟩_t, which is equal, according to Parseval’s theorem, to the area I under the frequency spectrum, and thus to σ_η^2 ∼ θ/T, using Eq. (5)."

    The effective temperature θ is obtained by integrating the measured spectrum: I = ∫ S_η(f) df = (k_B θ / 3πT) ln[min(f_p)/f_L] (Eq. 5). The paper then states that σ_η^2 equals the same area I by Parseval’s theorem, hence σ_η^2 ∼ θ/T. Since both quantities are computed from the same measured S_η(f), this scaling is an algebraic consequence of Eq. (5) and the identity σ_η^2 = I; it cannot independently confirm the thermodynamic relation. It remains useful only as a data-consistency check.

full rationale

The central claim—large-scale statistical equilibrium—rests on the measured spatial and frequency spectra matching the Rayleigh-Jeans predictions of Eq. (3) (S_η(k) ∼ k^{-1}) and Eq. (4) (S_η(f) ∼ f^{-1}) over more than a decade, together with zero net energy flux and Gaussian statistics. These comparisons are parameter-free in their power-law slopes and are not circular: the data could have disagreed. The effective temperature is a prefactor that is estimated from the spectrum via Eq. (5), and the observed 1/T dependence of the integrated spectral area is a genuine scaling test. The second estimation of θ from σ_η^2 is, however, identical by Parseval’s theorem to the area used in Eq. (5), so the reported θ ∼ σ_η^2 scaling is a definitional consistency check rather than an independent prediction. Similarly, the entropy derivative and heat-capacity results are derived by inserting the already-assumed Rayleigh-Jeans spectrum into the entropy definition; they are mathematical consequences of the observed spectrum, not independent thermodynamic evidence. The self-citations to earlier work by the same group (three-wave interactions, flux measurement) provide experimental context and methods and are not load-bearing in a way that forces the present conclusions. The absence of a direct measurement of low-frequency forcing leakage is a robustness concern for the equilibrium attribution, but it is not a circularity of the derivation. Overall, the core spectral-equilibrium evidence is self-contained; the circularity is confined to a secondary thermodynamic consistency check.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities are introduced. The central spectral claim rests on weak-turbulence theory, specifically the Rayleigh-Jeans form of Eq. (1), the three-wave no-inverse-cascade argument, and the dispersion relation Eq. (2). The tension T is inferred from dispersion fits and theta from the measured spectrum, so the thermodynamic scalings are mostly internal consistency checks rather than independent predictions.

free parameters (2)
  • Applied tension T = 1.0 to 7.0 N/m, inferred per run by polynomial fit to Eq. (2)
    T is controlled by the water-column pressure but is not known independently; it is obtained by fitting the measured dispersion relation. Equations (3) and (4) and the rescaled spectra depend on T.
  • Effective temperature theta = About 8x10^15 K, estimated from the spectral integral Eq. (5) and from the wave-amplitude variance
    theta sets the amplitude of the Rayleigh-Jeans spectra. It is not fixed a priori; it is estimated from the same spectra whose equilibrium form is the central claim. The later theta ~ sigma_eta^2 scaling and heat capacity are internal consistency checks.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Rayleigh-Jeans equilibrium spectrum E_Eq(k) = k_B theta/(2 pi rho) k for 2D wave turbulence
    Taken from weak turbulence theory [7,9] and the supplemental material; it is the theoretical template against which the measured spectra are compared.
  • domain assumption Hydroelastic wave dispersion relation omega^2 = gk + (T/rho) k^3 + (B/rho) k^5, deep-water regime, sheet inertia neglected
    Combines the Foeppl-von Karman equations with Bernoulli's theorem; used to convert spatial spectra to frequency spectra and to infer T. Appears as Eq. (2).
  • domain assumption Hydroelastic tensional waves undergo three-wave resonant interactions, so wave action is not conserved and no inverse cascade populates large scales
    Cited to [23,34-36]; this is the theoretical reason large scales should thermalize. If four-wave interactions or an inverse cascade dominated, the Rayleigh-Jeans prediction would not apply.
  • domain assumption Entropy functional S = k_B integral log[n(k)] dk (L/2 pi)^2 from the H-theorem, with n(omega) linked to the measured temporal spectrum
    Used to compute partial S / partial theta and the heat capacity; taken from wave turbulence theory [7]. The form of S presupposes a local wave-action description.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermodynamics and Statistical Equilibrium of Large-Scale Hydroelastic Wave Turbulence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4W2ZMNUA

@misc{pith2026250603353,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermodynamics and Statistical Equilibrium of Large-Scale Hydroelastic Wave Turbulence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4W2ZMNUA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03353}
}
read the original abstract

Understanding how statistical equilibrium can occur in out-of-equilibrium systems is of paramount interest, as it would enable the use of statistical mechanics tools to these systems. Here, we report the first experimental evidence of statistical equilibrium of the large scales of hydroelastic turbulent waves driven by small-scale random forcing. The wave field statistics at scales larger than the forcing scale, resolved in space and time, align well with the predictions of Rayleigh-Jeans equilibrium spectra over more than a decade. We measure zero net energy flux in this regime, as expected. We also determine the effective temperature, entropy, and heat capacity of this nonequilibrium system, demonstrating that classical thermodynamic concepts apply to describe large scales in statistical equilibrium of turbulent systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.03353 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Scheme of the experimental set-up. Top-left: typical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Power spectral density of the wave amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. for different T at fixed forcing amplitude. They are roughly found to decrease as the inverse of the ap￾plied tension, 1/T, as predicted by the right-hand side of Eq. (5) shown by the dashed line in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Falcon and N

    E. Falcon and N. Mordant, Experiments in gravity- capillary wave turbulence, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech.54, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Alexakis and L

    A. Alexakis and L. Biferale, Cascades and transitions in turbulent flows, Phys. Rep.767, 1 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    T. D. Lee, On some statistical properties of hydrodynam- ical and magneto-hydrodynamical fields, Quart. Appl. Math.10, 69 (1952); E. Hopf, Statistical hydromechan- ics and functional calculus, J. Rational Mech. Anal.1, 87 (1952); G. K. Batchelor and I. Proudman, The large-scale structure of homogenous turbulence, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A248, 369 (1956); P...

    work page 1952

  4. [4]

    Frisch, S

    U. Frisch, S. Kurien, R. Pandit, W. Pauls, S. S. Ray, A. Wirth, and J.-Z. Zhu, Hyperviscosity, Galerkin trun- cation, and bottlenecks in turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 144501 (2008); V. Dallas, S. Fauve, and A. Alex- akis, Statistical equilibria of large scales in dissipative hydrodynamic turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 204501 (2015); A. Alexakis and ...

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Gorce and E

    J.-B. Gorce and E. Falcon, Statistical equilibrium of large scales in three-dimensional hydrodynamic turbu- lence, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 054501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Gorce and E

    J.-B. Gorce and E. Falcon, Freely decaying Saffman tur- bulence experimentally generated by magnetic stirrers, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 264001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    V. E. Zakharov, V. Lvov, and G. Falkovich,Kolmogorov- Zakharov Spectra of Turbulence: Wave Turbulence (Springer, Cham, 2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    Nazarenko,Wave Turbulence(Springer, Berlin, 2011)

    S. Nazarenko,Wave Turbulence(Springer, Berlin, 2011)

    2011

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Balkovsky, G

    E. Balkovsky, G. Falkovich, V. Lebedev, and I. Ya Shapiro, Large-scale properties of wave turbulence, Phys. Rev. E52, 4537 (1995)

    1995

  2. [10]

    Michel, F

    G. Michel, F. P´ etr´ elis, and S. Fauve, Observation of ther- mal equilibrium in capillary wave turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 144502 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    Miquel, A

    B. Miquel, A. Naert, and S. Auma ˆ ıtre, Low-frequency spectra of bending wave turbulence, Phys. Rev. E103, L061001 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    C. Sun, S. Jia, C. Barsi, S. Rica, A. Picozzi, and J. W. Fleischer, Observation of the kinetic condensation of classical waves, Nature Phys.8, 470 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    Baudin, A

    K. Baudin, A. Fusaro, K. Krupa, J. Garnier, S. Rica, G. Millot, and A. Picozzi, Classical Rayleigh-Jeans con- densation of light waves: observation and thermody- namic characterization, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 244101 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    L. F. Cugliandolo, J. Kurchan, and L. Peliti, Energy flow, partial equilibration, and effective temperatures in sys- tems with slow dynamics, Phys. Rev. E55, 3898 (1997)

    1997

  7. [15]

    Fodor, C

    ´E. Fodor, C. Nardini, M. E. Cates, J. Tailleur, P. Visco, and F. van Wijland, How Far from Equilibrium Is Active Matter?, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 038103 (2016); B. Sorkin, H. Diamant, G. Ariel, and T. Markovich, Second Law of Thermodynamics without Einstein Relation, Phys. Rev. ...

    2016

  8. [16]

    D. P. Ruelle, Hydrodynamic turbulence as a problem in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA)109, 20344 (2012); S. D. Murugan, D. Kumar, S. Bhattacharjee, and S. S. Ray, Many-Body Chaos in Thermalized Fluids Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 124501 (2021)

    2012

  9. [17]

    Picozzi, J

    A. Picozzi, J. Garnier, T. Hansson, P. Suret, S. Randoux, G. Millot, D. N. Christodoulides, Optical wave turbu- lence: Towards a unified nonequilibrium thermodynamic formulation of statistical nonlinear optics, Phys. Reports 542, 1 (2014)

    2014

  10. [18]

    Y. Zhu, G. Krstulovic, and S. Nazarenko, Turbulence and far-from-equilibrium equation of state of Bogoliubov waves in Bose-Einstein condensates, arXiv.2408.15163

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    E. I. P˘ ar˘ au, C. T ¸ ugulan, O. Trichtchenko, and A. Al- berello, Flexural-Gravity Waves Under Ice Plates and Related Flows, inNonlinear Dispersive Waves, edited by D. Henry (Birkh¨ auser, Cham, 2024), pp. 173-200. J. W. Davys, R. J. Hosking, and A. D. Sneyd, Waves 6 due to...

    1985

  12. [20]

    R. M. S. M. Schulkes, R. J. Hosking, and A. D. Sneyd, Waves due to a steadily moving source on a floating ice plate. Part 2, J. Fluid Mech.180, 297 (1987)

    1987

  13. [21]

    Yang and L

    Y. Yang and L. Huang, Waves and structural strain induced by a uniform current flow underneath a semi- infinite floating solar coverage, Phys. Rev. Fluids9, 094804 (2024); C. M. Wang, E. Watanabe, and T. Ut- sunomiya,Very Large Floating Structures(Taylor and Francis, New York, 2008)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Deike, J

    L. Deike, J. -C. Bacri, and E. Falcon, Nonlinear waves on the surface of a fluid covered by an elastic sheet, J. Fluid Mech.733, 394 (2013)

    2013

  15. [23]

    Deike, M

    L. Deike, M. Berhanu, and E. Falcon, Experimental ob- servation of hydroelastic three-wave interactions, Phys. Rev. Fluids2, 064803 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    Montiel, F

    F. Montiel, F. Bonnefoy, P. Ferrant, L. G. Bennetts, V. A. Squire, and P. Marsault, Hydroelastic response of floating elastic disks to regular waves. Part 1: Wave tank experiments, J. Fluid Mech.723, 604 (2013)

    2013

  17. [25]

    M. H. Meylan, L. G. Bennetts, C. Cavaliere, A. Alberello, and A.Toffoli, Experimental and theoretical models of wave-induced flexure of a sea ice floe, Phys. Fluids27, 041704 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    Ono-dit-Biot, M

    J.-C. Ono-dit-Biot, M. Trejo, E. Loukiantcheko, M. Lauch, E. Rapha¨ el, K. Dalnoki-Veress, and T. Salez, Hydroelastic wake on a thin elastic sheet floating on wa- ter, Phys. Rev. Fluids4, 014808 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Domino, M

    L. Domino, M. Fermigier, and A. Eddi, Artificial reso- nant crystals for hydroelastic waves, Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 063701 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Domino, M

    L. Domino, M. Fermigier, E. Fort, and A. Eddi, Dispersion-free control of hydroelastic waves down to sub-wavelength scale, EPL12114001 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL] for further details on spectrum definitions, derivation of Eq. (1), movie of random hydroelastic waves, further analyses (container geometry effect, energy flux measurement, temporal fluc- tuations of the wave energy, effective temperature sc...

  22. [30]

    P. M. Morse and K. U. Ingard,Theoretical Acoustics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1986)

    1986

  23. [31]

    Michel, Three-wave interactions among surface grav- ity waves in a cylindrical container, Phys

    G. Michel, Three-wave interactions among surface grav- ity waves in a cylindrical container, Phys. Rev. Fluids 4, 012801 (2019); A. Cazaubiel, S. Mawet, A. Darras, G. Grosjean, J.J.W.A. van Loon, S. Dorbolo, and E. Falcon, Wave turbulence on the surface of a fluid in a high-gr...

    2019

  24. [32]

    Deike, M

    L. Deike, M. Berhanu, and E. Falcon, Decay of capillary wave turbulence, Phys. Rev. E85, 066311 (2012)

    2012

  25. [33]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Theory of Elasticity (2nd Ed., Pergamon Press, London, 1970)

    1970

  26. [34]

    A. V. Marchenko and V. I. Shrira, Theory of two- dimensional nonlinear waves in liquid covered by ice, Fluid Dyn.26, 580 (1991)

    1991

  27. [35]

    A. V. Marchenko and N. R. Sibgatullin, Evolution of wave packets in three-wave interaction in a heavy liquid under an ice covering, Fluid Dyn.22, 872 (1987)

    1987

  28. [36]

    M. W. Pierce, Y. Liu, and D. K. P. Yue, Sum- frequency triad interactions among surface waves prop- agating through an ice sheet, J. Fluid Mech.980, A45 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    Delory, D

    A. Delory, D. A. Kiefer, M. Lanoy, A. Eddi, C. Prada, and F. Lemoult, Viscoelastic dynamics of a soft strip sub- ject to a large deformation, Soft Matter20, 1983 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    P. J. Cobelli, A. Maurel, V. Pagneux, and P. Petitjeans, Global measurement of water waves by Fourier transform profilometry, Exp. Fluids,46, 1037 (2009)

    2009

  31. [39]

    Deike, M

    L. Deike, M. Berhanu, and E. Falcon, Energy flux mea- surement from the dissipated energy in capillary wave turbulence, Phys. Rev. E89, 023003 (2014)

    2014

  32. [40]

    Y. V. Lvov, A. He, and G. V. Kolmakov, Formation of the bi-directional energy cascade in low-frequency damped wave-turbulent systems, EPL112, 24004 (2015)

    2015

  33. [41]

    Alexakis, S

    A. Alexakis, S. Chibbaro, and G. Michel, Fluctuation re- lations at large scales in three-dimensional hydrodynamic turbulence, Europhysics Letters144, 43001 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Bouchet and A

    F. Bouchet and A. Venaille, Statistical mechanics of two- dimensional and geophysical flows, Physics Reports515, 227 (2012), and references therein

    2012

  35. [43]

    Connaughton, C

    C. Connaughton, C. Josserand, A. Picozzi, Y. Pomeau, and S. Rica, Condensation of classical nonlinear waves, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 263901 (2005); G. Krstulovic and M. Brachet, Dispersive Bottleneck Delaying Thermaliza- tion of Turbulent Bose-Einstein Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett...

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.