Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 67 references

A foundation-model approach to pediatric headache classification from rs-fMRI

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Pre-trained fMRI encoder classifies pediatric headache with AUROC 0.82 vs 0.67 for connectivity models; fine-tuning only hurt.

desk verdict A useful proof-of-concept undermined by a misreported method and invalid confidence intervals; worth reviewing but not yet citable as evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07287 v1 pith:4W5PHQML submitted 2026-08-07 cs.LG

Guilherme S. Imai Aldeia , Clara Moon , Julie Shulman , Navil Sethna , Allison Smith , Alyssa Lebel , William G. La Cava , Scott Holmes This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.LG
keywords pediatricheadacheresting-statefMRIfoundationmodelNeuroSTORMfunctionalconnectivitymachinelearningchronicmigrainetransfer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that a pre-trained fMRI foundation model can classify pediatric headache from resting-state brain scans without hand-built connectivity features. Using NeuroSTORM, a Mamba-based encoder pre-trained on over 28 million fMRI frames, with the model frozen and an L1-regularized logistic regression on its 288-dimensional embeddings, the authors report an AUROC of 0.82 and an AUPRC of 0.93 for headache versus healthy controls, compared to AUROC 0.67 for functional-connectivity matrix models. Chronic migraine was the separable subtype (AUROC 0.67 in the multiclass setting), while other headache types were not reliably distinguished. Notably, the abstract credits fine-tuning, but the paper's own Appendix A.3 reports that fine-tuning decreased performance to AUROC 0.74, so the headline results come from the frozen encoder. If the results hold, they suggest pre-trained neuroimaging models are a practical starting point for small clinical datasets where site-specific data cannot support training high-capacity models from scratch.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is NeuroSTORM, a four-stage Mamba (state-space) encoder for 4D fMRI pre-trained on more than 28 million fMRI frames and then used as a frozen feature extractor; global pooling of its output gives a 288-dimensional embedding per scan, which feeds an L1-regularized logistic regression. The comparison pipeline uses standard fMRI preprocessing, a 48-region cortical atlas to form pairwise correlation matrices, and the same shallow classifiers on those connectivity features. The mechanism that carries the argument is transfer: a simple linear head performs well on the pre-trained embeddings, which the paper attributes to the foundation model capturing resting-state dynamics that generalize to the headache task.

What would settle it

Run the identical binary pipeline with participant-level resampling, for example leave-one-subject-out (excluding both visits of the held-out participant) or a cluster bootstrap that resamples the 110 participants; if NeuroSTORM's AUROC 95% confidence interval then contains 0.67, the claimed advantage over functional connectivity is not established.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the embeddings of a pre-trained fMRI foundation model transfer to a pediatric headache classification task better than the standard functional-connectivity representation. In the authors' leave-one-out evaluation on 189 scans from 110 participants, L1-logistic regression on NeuroSTORM embeddings distinguishes any headache from healthy controls with AUROC 0.82 and AUPRC 0.93; the same classifier family trained on 1,128 functional-connectivity features reaches AUROC 0.67. Multiclass discrimination (healthy, chronic migraine, non-chronic headache) yields macro-AUROC 0.69, driven mostly by chronic migraine versus healthy controls. The paper therefore positions the foundation-model embedding as the effective feature representation under limited-data conditions, and it reports that task-specific fine-tuning of the encoder did not help.

Load-bearing premise

The reported margin assumes the 189 scans can be treated as independent draws, but 79 of the 110 participants supply two visits each, so subject-level variability is not captured by the paper's seed-based confidence intervals.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the result is correct, pre-trained fMRI encoders can act as off-the-shelf feature extractors for small clinical cohorts, sidestepping functional-connectivity feature engineering and high-dimensional overfitting.
  • Chronic migraine appears to carry a separable rs-fMRI signature in this cohort, while non-chronic headache subtypes (post-viral headache, NDPH, post-traumatic headache) are not cleanly separable at this sample size.
  • The paper's fine-tuning results imply that task-specific adaptation of a foundation model on small pediatric data is not yet beneficial; larger pediatric-specific pretraining or fine-tuning data would be needed to move subtype performance.
  • The demographic-only model's AUROC of 0.61 bounds what can be attributed to age and sex, so the embedding model's additional margin suggests added predictive value from brain activity, assuming the evaluation is valid.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Since the reported confidence intervals come from reseeding the solver 100 times, not from resampling participants, a participant-level resampling (cluster bootstrap or leave-one-subject-out) would likely widen the intervals substantially because 79 of 110 participants contribute two correlated visits; the 0.82-versus-0.67 gap may lose statistical significance.
  • A label-permutation test, or a control analysis that matches motion and acquisition wave, would clarify whether the embeddings encode headache biology or scan-level nuisances that happen to separate the groups.
  • A testable extension is to train only on first-visit scans and predict second-visit labels for the 79 returning participants; stable within-individual predictions would strengthen the clinical interpretation that the embeddings track an enduring headache-related state.
  • The discrepancy between the abstract's fine-tuning attribution and the paper's own Appendix A.3 should be corrected in revision; the frozen-embedding pipeline is what the data actually support.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a machine-learning study classifying pediatric headache from resting-state fMRI. The authors compare two representations: functional-connectivity matrices (1,128 features from 48 cortical ROIs) and 288-dimensional embeddings extracted from the pre-trained NeuroSTORM foundation model. Using 189 scans from 110 participants (79 with two visits), they evaluate binary headache-versus-healthy classification with participant-level leave-one-out cross-validation, repeated 100 times with different random seeds. They report AUROC 0.82 (95% CI 0.82–0.82) and AUPRC 0.93 for the NeuroSTORM embedding with L1-logistic regression, versus AUROC 0.67 for FC-based L1-logistic regression. They also report a three-class subtype model (healthy, chronic migraine, non-chronic headache) with macro-AUROC 0.69. The abstract describes the model as fine-tuned, but the main experiments use frozen embeddings; Appendix A.3 describes exploratory fine-tuning that underperformed the frozen-embedding model. The paper concludes that pre-trained fMRI embeddings transfer to pediatric headache classification without explicit FC features.

Significance. If the result holds, the demonstration that a pre-trained fMRI foundation model, applied as a frozen encoder, outperforms conventional FC-based classifiers in a small pediatric sample is a useful proof-of-concept with practical implications for limited-data clinical ML. The study has clear strengths: it uses an external pre-trained model (avoiding circularity), excludes all visits of a held-out participant from training (correct participant-level LOO), benchmarks against a demographic model, and reports stratified performance by sex. The code is released. However, the primary statistical evidence is undermined by the seed-only 'bootstrap' confidence intervals, which do not reflect participant-level sampling variability; the central claim of superiority over FC models is therefore not yet statistically quantified. The abstract's fine-tuning statement is also inaccurate.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; Appendix A.3] The abstract states that NeuroSTORM was 'fine-tuned' for the headache-classification tasks, but the main results in Table 2 and the pipeline in Figure 1 use the frozen pre-trained encoder with L1-logistic regression on 288-dimensional embeddings. Appendix A.3 reports that the exploratory fine-tuning experiment achieved AUROC 0.74 ± 0.04, below the frozen-embedding result of 0.82. The abstract and main text should be corrected so that the primary method is described as frozen-embedding feature extraction with a linear head, and fine-tuning as a separate exploratory result.
  2. [Section 3 (LOO bootstrap), Table 2] The 95% confidence intervals in Table 2 are derived by repeating leave-one-out cross-validation 100 times with different random seeds, as described in Section 3. This captures only solver and initialization stochasticity, not participant-level sampling variability, and it ignores that 79 of 110 participants contribute two correlated visits. The intervals (e.g., AUROC 0.82 [0.82, 0.82] and 0.67 [0.67, 0.67]) are therefore not valid confidence intervals for generalization performance. A participant-level bootstrap or permutation test should be provided to support the claim that NeuroSTORM outperforms FC-based models; without it, the headline 0.82 versus 0.67 gap is statistically unquantified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 2, Figure 4 caption] Replace 'bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals' with 'variation over 100 random seeds' unless a participant-level bootstrap is implemented, because the current procedure does not resample participants.
  2. [Section 6 (Limitations), Section 5 (Discussion)] There are typos: 'compreensive' should be 'comprehensive' and 'an compreensive' should be 'a comprehensive' in Section 6; 'hedaches' should be 'headaches' in Section 5.
  3. [Figure 1 caption] The Figure 1 caption contains a stray phrase, 'Xiang Li, Cheng Wang, Yu Jiang et al. structuralfunctional', that appears to be a leftover artifact; remove or clarify it.
  4. [Section 3.1] The statement that the IRB 'waived the requirement for informed consent' is unusual for a pediatric study; clarify whether this was a waiver of written documentation, whether parental permission and child assent were obtained, and how these processes were approved.
  5. [Section 3.3] The demographic model bins age as '18 months–3 years' and '3–5 years', but the cohort is aged 8–22; specify that such low-age bins are empty or choose bins that match the actual age range.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the central AUROC comparison is an external frozen-model evaluation, and the only self-citations are contextual.

full rationale

The central claim does not reduce to its own inputs. NeuroSTORM is an external pretrained model (Wang et al., 2026); the paper encodes locally collected rs-fMRI scans with frozen weights, trains an L1-regularized logistic regression under leave-one-out cross-validation that excludes all visits of the held-out participant, and compares against FC-matrix classifiers trained in the same pipeline. The AUROC 0.82 vs 0.67 is an out-of-sample comparison on a separate cohort, not a quantity defined by the fit. No equation or definition makes headache status a function of NeuroSTORM's embedding by construction, nor is any fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The only self-citations (Holmes et al. 2022, 2023) appear in Related Work and Discussion as contextual prior work; the headline result does not depend on them. The abstract's statement that NeuroSTORM was 'fine-tuned' is contradicted by Appendix A.3, which reports that fine-tuning underperformed (AUROC 0.74 +/- 0.04) and that the reported 0.82 result comes from a linear classifier on frozen embeddings; this is a reporting inconsistency, not circularity. The narrow confidence intervals in Table 2 reflect only seed-to-seed solver variation because the leave-one-out procedure was repeated 100 times without resampling participants; this is a statistical-validity limitation that the Limitations section does not acknowledge, but it does not make the point estimate circular. Therefore no circular step is established.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on standard neuroimaging assumptions and an unjustified statistical treatment of repeated measures. No new free parameters or invented entities are introduced for the main result; the classifier uses library defaults.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The CONN default preprocessing pipeline yields valid representations of neural activity for both FC and embedding inputs.
    Section 3 uses CONN defaults without validating against alternative pipelines.
  • domain assumption NeuroSTORM's pre-trained embeddings transfer to pediatric headache classification despite being trained mostly on adult and psychiatric cohorts.
    The paper relies on the frozen encoder without verifying distributional alignment for pediatric headache patients (Section 3.3, Discussion).
  • domain assumption Clinical diagnoses of headache subtypes are sufficiently reliable, especially for the 'non-chronic headache' group.
    The paper acknowledges non-chronic subtypes have less well-defined criteria (Section 4), so label noise is a real risk.
  • domain assumption The two scans from the same individual can be treated as independent observations in the evaluation metrics.
    LOO excludes all visits of the test participant from training, but the two test predictions from one participant are correlated; the paper does not model this in its confidence intervals.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A foundation-model approach to pediatric headache classification from rs-fMRI." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4W5PHQML

@misc{pith2026260807287,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A foundation-model approach to pediatric headache classification from rs-fMRI},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4W5PHQML}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07287}
}
read the original abstract

Headache is the most common neurological disorder in children and substantially affects quality of life. We investigated whether resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) can support pediatric headache classification using machine learning. We encoded rs-fMRI data using NeuroSTORM, a recent foundation model, and fine-tuned it to distinguish healthy controls from children with headache and subsequently classify headache subtypes. We compared NeuroSTORM with a standard neuroscience approach using functional-connectivity (FC) matrices derived from brain activity as predictors. Using 189 rs-fMRI scans from 110 individuals collected across two visits (prevalence of any headache: 74%), NeuroSTORM achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.82-0.82) and an area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.93-0.94) for discriminating headache from non-headache. In contrast, models trained on FC matrices showed lower performance (AUROC, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.67-0.67]; AUPRC, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.85-0.85]). In multiclass classification of healthy controls, chronic migraine, and non-chronic headaches (e.g., post-viral headache, new daily persistent headache, post-traumatic headache), NeuroSTORM achieved a macro-AUROC of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.68-0.69). Results suggest that the approach can distinguish chronic migraine but has difficulty differentiating other headache subtypes from chronic migraine. Overall, under limited-data conditions, NeuroSTORM appears to capture latent rs-fMRI representations that transfer to headache-related tasks without relying on FC features. These findings provide proof of concept for fMRI-based prediction of pediatric headache and highlight potential future utility for subtype identification and individualized treatment strategies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07287 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Experimental pipeline. The data are preprocessed to generate two distinct repre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustrative example of the data used in the experiments. The first three images [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Clinical and demographic measurements by cohort. (A) Age distribution across [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Precision-Recall and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) and Precision-Recall (PR) Curves for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Architecture of the NeuroSTORM encoder backbone. A preprocessed 4D fMRI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Understanding global feature contributions with additive importance measures , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  2. [2]

    On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space , author=

    LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space , author=. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin philosophical magazine and journal of science , volume=. 1901 , publisher=

    1901

  3. [3]

    1985 , publisher=

    Learning internal representations by error propagation , author=. 1985 , publisher=

    1985

  4. [4]

    2013 , publisher=

    Auto-encoding variational bayes , author=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  5. [5]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03426 , year=

    Umap: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03426 , year=

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    2020 , eprint=

    VAE-LIME: Deep Generative Model Based Approach for Local Data-Driven Model Interpretability Applied to the Ironmaking Industry , author=. 2020 , eprint=

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Developmental cognitive neuroscience , volume=

    The adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) study: imaging acquisition across 21 sites , author=. Developmental cognitive neuroscience , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  8. [8]

    2017 , publisher=

    Classification and regression trees , author=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    NeuroImage , volume=

    The human connectome project: a retrospective , author=. NeuroImage , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  2. [10]

    The Impact of Regularization on High-dimensional Logistic Regression , url =

    Salehi, Fariborz and Abbasi, Ehsan and Hassibi, Babak , booktitle =. The Impact of Regularization on High-dimensional Logistic Regression , url =

  3. [11]

    NeuroImage , volume=

    Variational autoencoder: An unsupervised model for encoding and decoding fMRI activity in visual cortex , author=. NeuroImage , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  4. [12]

    NeuroImage , volume=

    Representation learning of resting state fMRI with variational autoencoder , author=. NeuroImage , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  5. [13]

    NeuroImage , volume=

    State-space model with deep learning for functional dynamics estimation in resting-state fMRI , author=. NeuroImage , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  6. [14]

    Neuroimage , volume=

    The connectivity domain: Analyzing resting state fMRI data using feature-based data-driven and model-based methods , author=. Neuroimage , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  7. [15]

    Life , volume=

    Pediatric headache in primary care and emergency departments: consensus with RAND/UCLA method , author=. Life , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  8. [16]

    Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care , volume=

    Pediatric headache: an overview , author=. Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  9. [17]

    Neuroimage , volume=

    Machine learning classifiers and fMRI: a tutorial overview , author=. Neuroimage , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  10. [18]

    Magnetic resonance imaging , volume=

    Machine learning in resting-state fMRI analysis , author=. Magnetic resonance imaging , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  11. [19]

    Journal of neural engineering , volume=

    Modeling and augmenting of fMRI data using deep recurrent variational auto-encoder , author=. Journal of neural engineering , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  12. [20]

    Nature , volume=

    What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI , author=. Nature , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  13. [21]

    NeuroImage , volume=

    Learning and comparing functional connectomes across subjects , author=. NeuroImage , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  14. [22]

    Current pain and headache reports , volume=

    Chronic daily headache in children and adolescents , author=. Current pain and headache reports , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

    2012

  15. [23]

    Cuvellier, J-C and Cuisset, J-M and Vall. Les c. Archives de p. 2008 , publisher=

    2008

  16. [24]

    Neurology , volume=

    Frequent headaches in the preadolescent pediatric population: a population-based study , author=. Neurology , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

    2010

  17. [25]

    Smith and Jennifer Crotty , title =

    Callie Pawlowski and Cierra Buckman and Dmitry Tumin and Aimee W. Smith and Jennifer Crotty , title =. Clinical Pediatrics , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  18. [26]

    DiSabella , abstract =

    Raquel Langdon and Marc T. DiSabella , abstract =. Pediatric Headache: An Overview , journal =. 2017 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cppeds.2017.01.002 , url =

    2017 doi

  19. [27]

    The Feature Representation Ability of Variational AutoEncoder , year=

    Dong, Chenxi and Xue, Tengfei and Wang, Cong , booktitle=. The Feature Representation Ability of Variational AutoEncoder , year=

  20. [28]

    1987 , note =

    Principal component analysis , journal =. 1987 , note =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-7439(87)80084-9 , url =

    1987 doi

  21. [29]

    Shared Visual Representations in Human & Machine Intelligence , year=

    Redundancy and dependency in brain activities , author=. Shared Visual Representations in Human & Machine Intelligence , year=

  22. [30]

    International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos , volume =

    DE VICO FALLANI, FABRIZIO and TOPPI, JLENIA and DI LANZO, CLAUDIA and VECCHIATO, GIOVANNI and ASTOLFI, LAURA and BORGHINI, GIANLUCA and MATTIA, DONATELLA and CINCOTTI, FEBO and BABILONI, FABIO , title =. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos , volume =. 2012 , doi =

    2012

  23. [31]

    2014 , eprint=

    Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives , author=. 2014 , eprint=

    2014

  24. [32]

    Holmes and Minh Nguyen and Mert R

    Tong He and Ru Kong and Avram J. Holmes and Minh Nguyen and Mert R. Sabuncu and Simon B. Eickhoff and Danilo Bzdok and Jiashi Feng and B.T. Thomas Yeo , keywords =. Deep neural networks and kernel regression achieve comparable accuracies for functional connectivity prediction ...

    2020

  25. [33]

    Beyond functional connectivity: deep learning applied to resting-state fMRI time series in the prediction of 58 human traits in the HCP , elocation-id =

    Vieira, Bruno Hebling and Sch. Beyond functional connectivity: deep learning applied to resting-state fMRI time series in the prediction of 58 human traits in the HCP , elocation-id =. 2024 , doi =. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2024/03/12/2024.03.07.583858.full.pdf , ...

    2024

  26. [34]

    NeuroImage , volume=

    Disentangling time series between brain tissues improves fMRI data quality using a time-dependent deep neural network , author=. NeuroImage , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  27. [35]

    A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions , url =

    Lundberg, Scott M and Lee, Su-In , booktitle =. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions , url =

  28. [36]

    Neurology , author =

    Prediction of. Neurology , author =. 2024 , note =. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000205109 , abstract =

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    The Journal of Headache and Pain , author =

    Assessment of gray and white matter structural alterations in migraineurs without aura , volume =. The Journal of Headache and Pain , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1186/s10194-017-0783-5 , abstract =

    2017 doi

  30. [38]

    The Journal of Headache and Pain , author =

    Mapping brain functional networks topological characteristics in new daily persistent headache: a magnetoencephalography study , volume =. The Journal of Headache and Pain , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1186/s10194-023-01695-x , abstract =

    2023 doi

  31. [39]

    Scientific Reports , author =

    Data valuation for medical imaging using. Scientific Reports , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-87762-2 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  32. [40]

    Frontiers in Pain Research , author =

    Integrated. Frontiers in Pain Research , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.3389/fpain.2022.859881 , abstract =

    2022

  33. [41]

    Frontiers in Pain Research , author =

    The value of brain. Frontiers in Pain Research , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.3389/fpain.2022.1012831 , abstract =

    2023

  34. [42]

    Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain , author =

    Identifying and predicting headache trajectories among those with acute post‐traumatic headache , volume =. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1111/head.14955 , abstract =

    2025 doi

  35. [43]

    Frontiers in Neurology , author =

    Disentangling the neurological basis of chronic ocular pain using clinical, self-report, and brain imaging data: use of. Frontiers in Neurology , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1265082 , abstract =

    2023

  36. [44]

    Cephalalgia , author =

    Structural gray matter abnormalities in migraine relate to headache lateralization, but not aura , volume =. Cephalalgia , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1177/0333102414532378 , abstract =

    2015 doi

  37. [45]

    Journal of Pain Research , author =

    Alterations in. Journal of Pain Research , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.2147/JPR.S327945 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  38. [46]

    Alzheimer's Research & Therapy , author =

    Data analysis with. Alzheimer's Research & Therapy , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1186/s13195-021-00879-4 , abstract =

    2021 doi

  39. [47]

    and Qiu, Anqi and Hirschtick, Randy and Kim, Byung-Hoon and Han, Hongbin and Li, Xiang and Yuan, Yixuan , year =

    Wang, Cheng and Jiang, Yu and Peng, Zhihao and Li, Chenxin and Bang, Chang-Bae and Zhao, Lin and Fu, Wanyi and Lv, Jinglei and Sepulcre, Jorge and Yang, Carl and He, Lifang and Liu, Tianming and Kong, Xue-Jun and Li, Quanzheng and Barron, Daniel S. and Qiu, Anqi and Hirschtick...

    doi

  40. [48]

    Gu, Albert and Dao, Tri , month = may, year =. Mamba:. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2312.00752 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  41. [49]

    Liu, Ze and Lin, Yutong and Cao, Yue and Hu, Han and Wei, Yixuan and Zhang, Zheng and Lin, Stephen and Guo, Baining , month = aug, year =. Swin. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2103.14030 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  42. [50]

    , month = dec, year =

    Wei, Yuxiang and Zhang, Yanteng and Xiao, Xi and Qian, Chengxuan and Wang, Tianyang and Calhoun, Vince D. , month = dec, year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.21760 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  43. [51]

    Cephalalgia , author =

    Migraine classification using magnetic resonance imaging resting-state functional connectivity data , volume =. Cephalalgia , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1177/0333102416652091 , abstract =

    2017 doi

  44. [52]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2307.05916 , abstract =

    Kim, Peter Yongho and Kwon, Junbeom and Joo, Sunghwan and Bae, Sangyoon and Lee, Donggyu and Jung, Yoonho and Yoo, Shinjae and Cha, Jiook and Moon, Taesup , month = oct, year =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2307.05916 , abstract =

    doi arXiv

  45. [53]

    2021 , publisher=

    PyTorch library for CAM methods , author=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  46. [54]

    and Cogswell, Michael and Das, Abhishek and Vedantam, Ramakrishna and Parikh, Devi and Batra, Dhruv , year=

    Selvaraju, Ramprasaath R. and Cogswell, Michael and Das, Abhishek and Vedantam, Ramakrishna and Parikh, Devi and Batra, Dhruv , year=. Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization , volume=. International Journal of Computer Vision , publish...

    doi

  47. [55]

    Conn: A Functional Connectivity Toolbox for Correlated and Anticorrelated Brain Networks , volume =

    Whitfield-Gabrieli, Susan and Nieto-Castanon, Alfonso , year =. Conn: A Functional Connectivity Toolbox for Correlated and Anticorrelated Brain Networks , volume =. Brain Connectivity , publisher =. doi:10.1089/brain.2012.0073 , number =

    2012

  48. [56]

    and Baker, Chris I

    Poldrack, Russell A. and Baker, Chris I. and Durnez, Joke and Gorgolewski, Krzysztof J. and Matthews, Paul M. and Munafò, Marcus R. and Nichols, Thomas E. and Poline, Jean-Baptiste and Vul, Edward and Yarkoni, Tal , year =. Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reprodu...

    doi

  49. [57]

    and Ioannidis, John P

    Button, Katherine S. and Ioannidis, John P. A. and Mokrysz, Claire and Nosek, Brian A. and Flint, Jonathan and Robinson, Emma S. J. and Munafò, Marcus R. , year =. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , volume =. Nature Reviews Neuros...

    doi

  50. [58]

    and Montez, David F

    Marek, Scott and Tervo-Clemmens, Brenden and Calabro, Finnegan J. and Montez, David F. and Kay, Benjamin P. and Hatoum, Alexander S. and Donohue, Meghan Rose and Foran, William and Miller, Ryland L. and Hendrickson, Timothy J. and Malone, Stephen M. and Kandala, Sridhar and Fe...

  51. [59]

    and Owen, Adrian M

    Brett, Matthew and Johnsrude, Ingrid S. and Owen, Adrian M. , month = mar, year =. The problem of functional localization in the human brain , volume =. Nature Reviews Neuroscience , publisher =. doi:10.1038/nrn756 , abstract =

    doi

  52. [60]

    Validation of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) in patients with chronic migraine , volume =

    Rendas-Baum, Regina and Yang, Min and Varon, Sepideh F and Bloudek, Lisa M and DeGryse, Ronald E and Kosinski, Mark , year =. Validation of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) in patients with chronic migraine , volume =. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes , publisher =. doi:10....

    doi

  53. [61]

    Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology , volume =

    Youssef, Paul E and Mack, Kenneth J , title =. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14338 , url =. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/dmcn.14338 , abstract =

    doi

  54. [62]

    and Ugurbil, K

    Van Essen, D.C. and Ugurbil, K. and Auerbach, E. and Barch, D. and Behrens, T.E.J. and Bucholz, R. and Chang, A. and Chen, L. and Corbetta, M. and Curtiss, S.W. and Della Penna, S. and Feinberg, D. and Glasser, M.F. and Harel, N. and Heath, A.C. and Larson-Prior, L. and Marcus...

  55. [63]

    UK Biobank: An Open Access Resource for Identifying the Causes of a Wide Range of Complex Diseases of Middle and Old Age , volume =

    Sudlow, Cathie and Gallacher, John and Allen, Naomi and Beral, Valerie and Burton, Paul and Danesh, John and Downey, Paul and Elliott, Paul and Green, Jane and Landray, Martin and Liu, Bette and Matthews, Paul and Ong, Giok and Pell, Jill and Silman, Alan and Young, Alan and S...

  56. [64]

    and Cannonier, Tariq and Conley, May I

    Casey, B.J. and Cannonier, Tariq and Conley, May I. and Cohen, Alexandra O. and Barch, Deanna M. and Heitzeg, Mary M. and Soules, Mary E. and Teslovich, Theresa and Dellarco, Danielle V. and Garavan, Hugh and Orr, Catherine A. and Wager, Tor D. and Banich, Marie T. and Speer, ...

  57. [65]

    , year =

    Blume, Heidi K. , year =. Pediatric Headache: A Review , volume =. Pediatrics In Review , publisher =. doi:10.1542/pir.33.12.562 , number =

    doi

  58. [66]

    Functional connectivity of the anterior cingulate cortex with pain-related regions in children with post-traumatic headache , volume =

    Ofoghi, Zahra and Rohr, Christiane S and Dewey, Deborah and Bray, Signe and Yeates, Keith Owen and Noel, Melanie and Barlow, Karen M , year =. Functional connectivity of the anterior cingulate cortex with pain-related regions in children with post-traumatic headache , volume =...

    doi

  59. [67]

    2018 , doi =

    The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition , journal =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.