Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Pitfalls in Machine Learning Research: Reexamining the Development Cycle

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.02832 v2 pith:4WBVULTF submitted 2020-11-04 cs.LG stat.MEstat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.MEstat.ML
keywords learningmachinedatapitfallsattentiondesigndevelopmentdrawing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning has the potential to fuel further advances in data science, but it is greatly hindered by an ad hoc design process, poor data hygiene, and a lack of statistical rigor in model evaluation. Recently, these issues have begun to attract more attention as they have caused public and embarrassing issues in research and development. Drawing from our experience as machine learning researchers, we follow the machine learning process from algorithm design to data collection to model evaluation, drawing attention to common pitfalls and providing practical recommendations for improvements. At each step, case studies are introduced to highlight how these pitfalls occur in practice, and where things could be improved.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools